Peer review reports
From: Informed consent and registry-based research - the case of the Danish circumcision registry
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Feb 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 Apr 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Allan J. Jacobs |
4 May 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Darby |
30 Jun 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Ploug |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
30 Jun 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Oct 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Allan J. Jacobs |
16 Oct 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Darby |
2 Feb 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jonathan Ives |
10 Apr 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Ploug |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 Apr 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Jul 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Ploug |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
29 Jul 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
7 Sep 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
15 Sep 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12910-017-0212-y |