Peer review reports
From: Developing automated methods for disease subtyping in UK Biobank: an exemplar study on stroke
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Feb 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
30 Apr 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
4 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
8 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
9 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
17 May 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Kristiina Rannikmäe |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 May 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
18 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
21 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
24 May 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Kristiina Rannikmäe |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 May 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
31 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
5 Jun 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
7 Jun 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Publishing | ||
8 Jun 2021 | Editorially accepted | |
15 Jun 2021 | Article published | 10.1186/s12911-021-01556-0 |