Peer review reports
From: Exploring variation in the use of feedback from national clinical audits: a realist investigation
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Feb 2020 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 Feb 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Alvarado |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Feb 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
16 Mar 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael G. Pearson |
28 May 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
30 Jun 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Alvarado |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
30 Jun 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 Jul 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael G. Pearson |
21 Jul 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
7 Aug 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Alvarado |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
7 Aug 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
17 Aug 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Sep 2020 | Article published | 10.1186/s12913-020-05661-0 |