Table 1 Relative genus abundance associations with future HAZ estimated using multivariable between-within twin regression models for genera with a significant difference in degree centrality between cases and controls
Malawi | Bangladesh | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus | Abundance differencea | Coefficient (90 % CI) | p value | Adjusted p value | Abundance differencea | Coefficient (90 % CI) | p value | Adjusted p value |
Acidaminococcus | 0.40 | −0.080 (−0.124, −0.037) | <0.01 | 0.02 | 0.30 | −0.191 (−0.253, −0.129) | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Acinetobacter b | 0.00 | −0.032 (−0.159, 0.094) | 0.68 | 0.89 | ||||
Anaerococcus b | 0.01 | −0.182 (−0.915, 0.551) | 0.68 | 0.89 | ||||
Bacteroides | 4.51 | 0.000 (−0.001, 0.001) | 0.67 | 0.89 | 0.29 | −0.001 (−0.002, 0.001) | 0.63 | 0.89 |
Blautia | 2.51 | −0.001 (−0.003, 0.002) | 0.64 | 0.89 | 5.00 | 0.001 (0.000, 0.001) | 0.07 | 0.45 |
Brachyspira | 1.03 | 0.003 (−0.002, 0.007) | 0.32 | 0.89 | ||||
Chlamydiaceae_uncl | 0.37 | −0.012 (−0.054, 0.030) | 0.65 | 0.89 | ||||
Coprococcus | 0.35 | −0.006 (−0.061, 0.049) | 0.87 | 0.92 | 4.33 | −0.003 (−0.010, 0.003) | 0.38 | 0.89 |
Geobacillus b | 0.01 | 0.266 (−0.154, 0.685) | 0.30 | 0.89 | ||||
Haemophilus | 0.76 | 0.001 (−0.009, 0.010) | 0.92 | 0.92 | ||||
Lactococcus b | 0.04 | −0.002 (−0.007, 0.004) | 0.59 | 0.89 | ||||
Micrococcus b | 0.46 | −0.107 (−2.183, 0.169) | 0.16 | 0.94 | ||||
Neisseriaceae_uncl | 0.22 | −0.027 (−0.103,0.048) | 0.56 | 0.89 | 0.01 | 0.001 (−0.001, 0.004) | 0.46 | 0.64 |
Proteus b | 0.00 | −0.002 (−0.037, 0.033) | 0.94 | 0.94 | ||||
Sarcina b | 5.00 | 0.000 (0.000, 0.001) | 0.54 | 0.89 | ||||