Table 4 Outcomes in the feasibility progression criteria (evaluating either stop or continue with modification) (n = 7 as one person dropped out due to back problems at Week 6).
Criteria | Result (n/%) | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
Adverse events | ||
Number of incidents of autonomic hyperreflexia | 0 | Continue |
Number of incidents of acute cardiac events | 0 | Continue |
Participant acceptability | ||
Number of participants who rated experience during and after training higher than 3 (on a 1–7–point Likert scale with one being most acceptable) | 1 | Continue |
Participant preference for training | ||
Number of participants preferring continuous training to interval training | 1 | Continue |
Shoulder pain | ||
Number of participants with WUSPI PC score > 45 after the intervention | 0 | Continue |
Intensity | ||
Proportion of participants who reached 90% peak watts | ||
FES leg cycle | 43% | Continue with modification |
SkiErg | 14% | Continue with modification |
Attendance | ||
Proportion of fulfilled training minutes (total per person = 805 min) | 82% | Continue |