Abstract
Dicyemids are the most common and characteristic endosymbionts found in the renal sac of benthic cephalopods. In this chapter, we introduce biology and diversity of dicyemids of European typical cephalopods, Octopus vulgaris and Sepia officinalis. The diphasic life cycle of dicyemids consists of vermiform stages formed asexually and an infusoriform stage developed sexually. Their morphology varies depending on the development stage. Recent molecular studies suggested that dicyemids belong to lophotrochozoans. In Europe, 16 dicyemid species were described from 17 cephalopod species.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
The renal organs of cephalopods are the renal complex (renal and pancreatic appendages) and the branchial heart complex (branchial heart and pericardial appendage). Prior to release, urine is collected in a renal sac, the fluid-filled coelom of which is a unique environment providing living space for a diversity of endosymbionts (Hochberg 1982; Furuya et al. 2004b). There are phylogenetically distant parasitic organisms, trematodes, dicyemids, and chromidinids, in the kidney of cephalopods (Nouvel 1945; Hochberg and Short 1983; Hochberg 1990; Furuya et al. 2004a). Dicyemids (Phylum Dicyemida) are the commonest and most characteristic endosymbionts that are found in the renal sac of benthic cephalopod molluscs. The body length of dicyemid species ranges from 0.1 to 10 mm. Typically, two or three dicyemid species are found in individuals of each cephalopod species and most are host specific (Furuya 1999). Currently, about 140 dicyemid species have been recorded from cephalopod hosts distributed in a variety of geographical localities: the Okhotsk Sea, Japan Sea, western and eastern North Pacific Ocean, waters around New Zealand, North Indian Ocean, Mediterranean, western North and eastern Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Antarctic Ocean (Catalano 2013; Castellanos-Martinez et al. 2016; Furuya 1999; Furuya and Tsuneki 2003; Hochberg 1990; McConnaughey 1951; Nouvel 1947; Short 1991). The dicyemids are heavily infecting the renal organs in their host cephalopods (Fig. 11.1). However, this is somewhat surprising; no damage has ever been observed in the tissues. This means that dicyemids are not pathogens to their cephalopod hosts. There must be interaction between dicyemids and their host renal organs; it is possible that dicyemids are beneficial for their hosts.
In this chapter, we introduce biology of dicyemids and dicyemid species of European typical cephalopods, O. vulgaris and S. officinalis.
2 Life Cycle
The diphasic life cycle of dicyemids, with a characteristic asexual phase, likely evolved as an adaptation to parasitism (Fig. 11.2), presumably to enable them to adapt to the cephalopod renal organs. The life cycle of dicyemids consists of two phases of different body organizations (Fig. 11.2). The first phase is the vermiform stages, in which the dicyemid exists as a vermiform embryo formed asexually, and as a final form, the nematogen, or rhombogen. The second phase is the infusoriform embryo that develops from a fertilized egg. The shift from an asexual mode to a sexual mode of reproduction may be caused by a high population density in the cephalopod kidney (Lapan and Morowitz 1975). Vermiform stages are restricted to the renal sac of cephalopods, whereas the infusoriform embryos escape from the host into the sea to search for a new host. However, it is not clear how infusoriform larvae develop into vermiform stages in the new host.
3 General Morphology
Vermiform stages, vermiform embryos, nematogens, and rhombogens are similar in shape (Fig. 11.2). The body surface of dicyemids has numerous cilia and the folded structure, which is considered to contribute to absorb nutrients more efficiently from urine (Bresciani and Fenchel 1965; Ridley 1968; Furuya et al. 1997). The number of peripheral cells is species specific and constant. At the anterior region, 4–10 peripheral cells form the calotte, of which cilia are shorter and denser than in more posterior peripheral cells (Fig. 11.2). The calotte shape varies, depending on the species, and adapts to attach to the various regions of renal tissues in the host kidneys (Furuya et al. 2003a) (Figs. 11.3 and 11.4). There is a central cylindrical cell called the axial cell, which extends to 100 mm in length in the largest dicyemid.
Regarding the number of somatic cells, the dicyemid is a multicellular animal that is composed of the fewest in number of cells in metazoans except for aberrant myxozoans. This organization does not correspond to metazoan two-layered construction of endoderm and ectoderm, and dicyemids have neither body cavities nor differentiated organs.
Infusoriform embryos are ovoid and have both anteroposterior axis and dorsoventral axis. Embryos mostly consist of 37 or 39 cells (Short 1971; Furuya 1999), which are more differentiated than those of vermiform stages (Matsubara and Dudley 1976; Furuya et al. 2004b). Internally, there are four large cells called urn cells, each containing a germinal cell that probably gives rise to the next generation (Fig. 11.2). At the anterior region of embryo, there is a pair of unique cell called the apical cell (Fig. 11.5), each containing a refringent body composed of magnesium inositol hexaphosphate (Lapan 1975a). The external cells are mostly ciliated. Infusoriform embryos swim while spinning the body.
The bodies of vermiform stages might be simplified as a reflection of their specialization in their parasitic habitat composed of renal tubules (Nouvel 1947). By contrast, infusoriform embryos seem to represent the true level of organization due to free-swimming organisms (Furuya et al. 1997). However, the body organization of infusoriform embryos cannot be regarded as achieving the grade of tissue level.
4 Relationship with Cephalopods
Dicyemids are usually found to be heavily infecting the renal organs in their host cephalopods (Fig. 11.1). No damage has ever been observed in the infected renal tissue, so dicyemids apparently do no harm to their cephalopod hosts. Lapan (1975b) has even suggested that dicyemids facilitate host excretion of ammonia by contributing to acidification of the urine. In addition to the normal muscular contraction of the renal appendages, the ciliary activity of dicyemids present in the kidneys maintains a constant flow of urine, and as a result dicyemids assist in removal of urine. Thus, dicyemids are symbiotic, rather than parasitic, in their relationship with cephalopods.
The majority of the dicyemid species studied were found to be host specific (Furuya 1999). Typically, two or more species of dicyemids are present in each host species or each host individual. There is a certain relationship between the calotte configuration of vermiform stages and the co-occurrence pattern in hosts (Fig. 11.6). Vermiform individuals live specifically within the renal sac. Their anterior region, termed a “calotte”, is critical in adapting to their habitats in the renal sac. They insert the distinct anterior region into renal tubules or crypts of the renal appendages of the host (Ridley 1968; Furuya et al. 1997) or attach to surfaces of the renal appendages with a flat anterior region (Furuya et al. 2003a; Furuya 2005, 2006) (Fig. 11.3).
5 Systematic Position
Van Beneden (1876) regarded the dicyemids as intermediate in the body plan between Protozoa and Metazoa, and thus gave them the name Mesozoa. This phylum included other several microscopical enigmatic organisms, Trichoplax, Haplozoon, Neresheimeria, Salinella, and orthonectids, which were not assignable to any of phyla. Most of these organisms were subsequently belonged to the other phyla (Hyman 1940). Only dicyemids and orthonectids were often united into a single phylum Mesozoa. Later, Hochberg (1990) and Kozloff (1990) treated them independently as a separate phylum, Dicyemida and Orthonectida, in each review. However, they were still treated as the Mesozoa in the many zoological textbooks, because of their unclear relationships among animals. Several zoologists regard the simple organization of dicyemids to be the result of specialization for parasitism (Nouvel 1947; Stunkard 1954; Ginetsinskaya 1988). However, Hyman (1956), Lapan and Morowitz (1975), and Ohama et al. (1984) concurred that dicyemids are primitive multicellular organisms. Since dicyemids have several protozoan-like features, an affinity to the protozoans has been pointed out (Czaker 2006; Noto and Endoh 2004). Current analyses of molecular sequences have revealed that, rather than truly primitive animals that deserve the name “mesozoan”, they probably belong to the lophotrochozoans (Katayama et al. 1995; Kobayashi et al. 1999; Aruga et al. 2007; Suzuki et al. 2010; Mikhailov et al. 2016; Lu et al. 2017). Despite their extremely reduced body plan, dicyemids still appear to exhibit some degree of cell differentiation (Ogino et al. 2011). In this reason, the name Mesozoa is not suited for their phylogenetic place; the Dicyemida, which is the first name of dicyemids by Khrone (1839), has been used as the phylum name of dicyemids in 1999 (Furuya 1999).
6 Diversity of Dicyemids in Europe
Cephalopods are commercially important in European countries. Many species of cephalopods have been examined for parasites in European waters. Sixteen species of dicyemids were described from 17 species of cephalopods, so far (Table 11.1). From one to four dicyemid species have been recorded in a single species of cephalopods. Most dicyemid species are host specific. However, 18 dicyemid species are known to have a relatively wide host range (Furuya 1999). In European dicyemids, for instance, Dicyema macrocephalum van Beneden (1876) appears to infect five cephalopod species belonging to three genera. The other species with a wide host range have been described mostly without using characters of the infusoriform embryos, so it will be necessary to examine the cellular composition of the infusoriform embryos of these other species to confirm their occurrence in more than one species.
O. vulgaris, the common octopus, is the commercially most important species in the European cephalopods. Therefore, this species has been well studied for the parasite. Four species of dicyemids, Conocyema polymorpha, Dicyema paradoxum, Dicyema typus, and Dicyemennea lameerei, have been described from O. vulgaris in the Mediterranean Sea, the English Channel, and the Eastern North Atlantic Ocean (Table 11.1). Typically, two or three species of dicyemids are present in each host species or each host individual, all four species were never simultaneously present in a single-host individual (Furuya et al. 2003b). Dicyema and Dicyemennea are common, and the largest number of species is placed in these genera. Several other genera are monotypic or contain only a small number of species. C. polymorpha is the unusual dicyemid, which is irregular in shape and lacking external cilia (Fig. 11.7). It has relatively small-sized species with 12 peripheral cells. The vermiform larvae are cuneiform and have distinct calottes, which consist of only single tier of four propolar cells. In this species, four parapolar cells are located in the posterior part of propolar cells instead of metapolar cells (Fig. 11.5).
S. officinalis is also commercial species in Europe countries; it is a common inhabitant of the English Channel and Mediterranean Sea. Four species of dicyemids are also recorded from this host cephalopod, namely, Dicyemennea gracile, Pseudicyema truncatum, Dicyema whitmani, and Microcyema vespa (Table 11.1). M. vespa is unusual in that the body forms a syncytium and the calotte is irregular (Fig. 11.7). In M. vespa, the calotte region can only be recognized in the larval stage (Fig. 11.5) (Furuya et al. 2001). P. truncatum is the most common species observed with the highest prevalence, nearly 80%. In contrast, D. whitmani is a very rare species that has been found in only one cuttlefish host individual collected off Naples, Italy (Furuya and Hochberg 1998).
The dicyemid fauna in the coastal areas of the United States and Japan has been well studied (Furuya 2016), as well as in European waters. The cephalopod fauna in European waters is similar to the Japanese waters, not to the United States, because no cuttlefish (Sepia) lives in the coastal areas of the United States. From the ecological viewpoint, O. vulgaris and S. officinalis are comparable to the Japanese species, Octopus sinensis and Sepia esculenta, respectively. O. sinensis has been regarded as the same species as O. vulgaris (Gleadall 2016). S. esculenta is a common cuttlefish in Japanese waters. However, Conocyema and Microcyema species have never been found in these host species and the other Japanese cephalopods. The presence of various genera may be characteristic of the dicyemid fauna in Europe.
7 Concluding Remarks
What I always consider first is when they met cephalopods and where dicyemids come from. The earliest dicyemids must be harmful as well as many other parasites. However, it seems that dicyemids took a new way of life call the “symbiosis”. Now dicyemids do no harm to their host cephalopods, rather may give benefits. In this sense, dicyemids are considered to be one of the most advanced parasites.
References
Aruga J, Odaka YS, Kamiya A, Furuya H (2007) Dicyema Pax6 and Zic: tool-kit genes in a highly simplified bilaterian. BMC Evol Biol 7:201
Bresciani J, Fenchel T (1965) Studies on dicyemid Mesozoa. I. The fine structure of the adult (nematogen and rhombogen stage). Vidensk Med Dansk Naturh For 124:367–408
Castellanos-Martinez S, Aguirre-Macedo ML, Furuya H (2016) Two new species of dicyemid mesozoans (Dicyemida: Dicyemidae) from Octopus maya Voss and Solis-Ramirez (Octopodidae) off Yucatan, Mexico. Syst Parasitol 93:551–564
Catalano SR (2013) First descriptions of dicyemid mesozoans (Dicyemida: Dicyemidae) from Australian octopus (Octopodidae) and cuttlefish (Sepiidae) species, including a new record of Dicyemennea in Australian waters. Folia Parasitol 60:306–320
Czaker R (2006) Serotonin immunoreactivity in a highly enigmatic metazoan phylum, the pre-nervous Dicyemida. Cell Tiss Res 326:843–850
Dhikra S, Florent I, Dellinger M, Justine JL, Romdhane MS, Grellier P, Furuya H (2016) Redescription of Dicyemennea eledones (Wagener, 1857) (Phylum Dicyemida) from Eledone cirrhosa (Lamark, 1789) (Mollusca: Cephalopoda: Octopoda). Syst Parasitol 93:905–915
Furuya H (1999) Fourteen new species of dicyemid mesozoans from six Japanese cephalopods, with comments on host specificity. Species Diver 4:257–319
Furuya H (2005) Three new species of Dicyema (Phylum Dicyemida) from Amphioctopus kagoshimensis (Mollusca: Cephalopoda: Octopodidae). Species Diver 10:231–247
Furuya H (2006) Three new species of dicyemid mesozoans (Phylum Dicyemida) from Amphioctopus fangsiao (Mollusca: Cephalopoda), with comments on the occurrence patterns of dicyemids. Zool Sci 23:105–119
Furuya H (2016) Diversity and morphological adaptation of dicyemids in Japan. Springer, Anim Diver Gener, pp 401–417
Furuya H, Hochberg FG (1998) Three new species of Dicyema (Phylum Dicyemida) from cephalopods in the Western Mediterranean. Vie et Milieu 49:117–128
Furuya H, Tsuneki K (2003) Biology of Dicyemid Mesozoan. Zool Sci 20:519–532
Furuya H, Tsuneki K, Koshida Y (1997) Fine structure of a dicyemid mesozoan, Dicyema acuticephalum, with special reference to cell junctions. J Morphol 231:297–305
Furuya H, Hochberg FG, Tsuneki K (2001) Developmental patterns and cell lineages of vermiform embryos in dicyemid mesozoans. Biol Bull 201:405–416
Furuya H, Hochberg FG, Tsuneki K (2003a) Calotte morphology in the phylum Dicyemida: niche separation and convergence. J Zool 259:361–373
Furuya H, Hochberg FG, Tsuneki K (2003b) Reproductive traits of dicyemids. Mar Biol 142:693–706
Furuya H, Hochberg FG, Tsuneki K (2004a) Cell number and cellular composition in infusoriform larvae of Dicyemid Mesozoans (Phylum Dicyemida). Zool Sci 21:877–889
Furuya H, Ota M, Kimura R, Tsuneki K (2004b) The renal organs of cephalopods: a habitat for dicyemids and chromidinids. J Morphol 262:629–643
Ginetsinskaya TA (1988) Trematodes, their life cycles, biology and evolution. (Translation of the original Russian edition, 1968) Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
Gleadall IG (2016) Octopus sinensis d’Orbigny, 1841 (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae): valid species name for the commercially valuable East Asian common octopus. Species Diver 21:31–42
Hartmann M (1906) “Untersuchungen ueber den Generationswechsel der Diyemedin” Mem Acad Roy Belgique Serie 2, 17
Hochberg FG (1982) The “kidneys” of cephalopods: a unique habitat for parasites. Malacologia 23:121–134
Hochberg FG, Short RB (1983) Dicyemennea discocephala sp. n. (Mesozoa Dicyemidae) in a finned octopod from the Antarctic. J Parasitol 69:963–966
Hochberg FG (1990) Diseases caused by protistans and mesozoans. In: Kinne O (ed) Diseases of marine animals, vol III. Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Hamburg, pp 47–202
Hyman LH (1940) The invertebrates. Protozoa through Ctenophora, vol I. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 233–247
Hyman LH (1956) The invertebrates. Smaller coelomate groups, vol V. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 713–715
Katayama T, Wada H, Furuya H, Sato N, Yamamoto M (1995) Phylogenetic position of the dicyemid Mesozoa inferred from 18S rDNA sequences. Biol Bull 189:81–90
Kobayashi M, Furuya H, Holland WH (1999) Dicyemids are higher animals. Nature 401:762
Kozloff EN (1990) Phyla Placozoa, Dicyemida, and Orthonectida. In: Invertebrates. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, pp 210–220
Lapan EA (1975a) Studies on the chemistry of the octopus renal system and an observation on the symbiotic relationship of the dicyemid Mesozoa. Comp Biochem Physiol 52:651–657
Lapan EA (1975b) Inositol polyphosphate deposits in the dense bodies of mesozoan dispersal larvae. Exp Cell Res 83:143–151
Lapan EA, Morowitz HJ (1975) The dicyemid Mesozoa as an integrated system for morphogenetic studies. 1. Description, isolation and maintenance. J Exp Zool 193:147–160
Lu T-M, Kanda M, Satoh N, Furuya H (2017) The phylogenetic position of dicyemid mesozoans offers insights into spiralian evolution. Zool Letters 3:6
Matsubara JA, Dudley PL (1976) Fine structural studies of the dicyemid mesozoan, Dicyemennea californica McConnaughey, II. The young vermiform stage and the infusoriform larva. J Parasitol 62:390–409
McConnaughey BH (1951) The life cycle of the dicyemid Mesozoa. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Ángeles 55:295–336
Mikhailov KV, Slyusarev GS, Nikitin MA, Logacheva MD, Penin AA, Aleoshin VV (2016) The genome of Intoshia linei affirms orthonectids as highly simplified spiralians. Curr Biol 26:1–7
Noto T, Endoh H (2004) A “chimera” theory on the origin of dicyemid mesozoans: evolution driven by frequent lateral gene transfer from host to parasite. Biosystem 73:73–83
Nouvel H (1944) Les Dicyémides des Sepiolidae des côtes françaises. Bull Inst Océanogr Monaco 869:1–12
Nouvel H (1945) Les Dicyémides de quelque Céphalopodes côtes françaises avec indication de la presence de Chromidinides. Bull Inst Océanog Monaco 887:1–8
Nouvel H (1947) Les Dicyémides. 1re partie: systématique, générations, vermiformes, infusorigène et sexualité. Arch Biol, Paris 58:59–220
Nouvel H (1961) Un Dicyémide nouveau, Pleodicyema delamarei n. g., n. sp., parasite du Céphalopode Bathypolypus sponsalis, remarques sur la validité des genres Dicyemodeca Wheeler, Pseudicyema Nouvel et Microcyema v. Bened. Vie Milieu 12:565–574
Ogino K, Tsuneki K, Furuya H (2011) Distinction of cell types in Dicyema japonicum (Phylum Dicyemida) by expression patterns of 16 genes. J Parasitol 97: 596–601
Ohama T, Kumazaki T, Hori T, Osawa S (1984) Evolution of multicellular animals as deduced from 5Sribosomal RNA sequences: a possible early emergence of the Mesozoa. Nucleic Acids Res 12:5101–5108
Ridley RK (1968) Electron microscopic studies on dicyemid mesozoa. I. Vermiform stages. J Parasitol 54:975–998
Short RB (1971) Three new species of Dicyema (Mesozoa: Dicyemidae) from New Zealand. Antarc Res Ser (Biology of the Antarctic Seas 4) 17:231–249
Short RB (1991) Marine Flora and Fauna of the Eastern United States, Dicyemida. NOAA Tech Rep NMFS 100
Stunkard HW (1954) The life history and systematic relations of the Mesozoa. Q Rev Biol 29:230–244
Suzuki GT, Ogino K, Tsuneki K, Furuya H (2010) Phylogenetic analysis of dicyemid mesozoans (Phylum Dicyemida) from innexin amino acid sequences: dicyemids are not related to Platyhelminthes. J Parasitol 96:614–625
van Beneden É (1876) Recherches sur les Dicyémides, survivants actuels d’un embranchement des Mésozoaires. Bull Acad Roy Belg 42:3–111
van Beneden É (1882) Contribution à l’histoire des Dicyémides. Arch Biol Paris 3:195–228
von Kölliker A (1849) Über Dicyema paradoxum, den Schmarotzer der Venenanhänge der Cephalopoden. Ber König Zootom Anst Würzburg 2:53–58
Wagener GR (1857) Über Dicyema Kölliker. Arch Patholo Anat Physiol 1857:354–364
Whitmann CO (1883) A contribution to the embryology, life history, and classification of the dicyemids. Mitt Zoolo Station Neapel 4:1–89
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Furuya, H., Souidenne, D. (2019). Dicyemids. In: Gestal, C., Pascual, S., Guerra, Á., Fiorito, G., Vieites, J. (eds) Handbook of Pathogens and Diseases in Cephalopods. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11330-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11330-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11329-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11330-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)