Abstract
Modeling languages determine the concepts that can be used to describe an extract from perceived reality and how these concepts can be put into mutual relationship. Modeling languages thus provide the vocabulary and the grammar needed to represent real-life situations in models. They will subsequently be considered in a structured way.
Chapter PDF
References
Curtis, B., Kellner, M. I., & Over, J. (1992). Process modeling. Communications of the ACM, 35, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/130994.130998.
Kunze, M., Luebbe, A., Weidlich, M., & Weske, M. (2011). Towards understanding process modeling – The case of the BPM academic initiative. In International workshop on business process modeling notation (pp. 44–58). Berlin: Springer.
Recker, J., Safrudin, N., & Rosemann, M. (2012). How novices design business processes. Information Systems, 37, 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2011.07.001.
Herrmann, T., & Loser, K. (1999). Vagueness in models of socio-technical systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18, 313–323.
Nüttgens, M., & Rump, F. (2002). Syntax und Semantik Ereignisgesteuerter Prozessketten (EPK). In Promise (pp. 64–77).
Dumas, M., & ter Hofstede, A. (2001). UML activity diagrams as a workflow specification language. In UML 2001 – The unified modeling language modeling languages, concepts, and tools (pp. 76–90). Berlin: Springer.
White, S., & Miers, D. (2008). BPMN modeling and reference guide: Understanding and using BPMN. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 3, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0963-8687(94)90004-3.
Fleischmann, A. (2010). What is S-BPM? In S-BPM ONE – Setting the stage for subject-oriented business process management (Vol. 85, pp. 85–106). Heidelberg: Springer.
Soderstrom, E., Andersson, B., Johannesson, P., et al. (2002). Towards a framework for comparing process modelling languages. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE) (Vol. 2348, pp. 600–611). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47961-9_41.
Oppl, S. (2018). Which concepts do inexperienced modelers use to model work? – An exploratory study. In Proceedings of MKWI 2018.
Soffer, P., Kaner, M., & Wand, Y. (2012). Towards understanding the process of process modeling: Theoretical and empirical considerations. In Business process management workshops (pp. 357–369). Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fleischmann, A., Oppl, S., Schmidt, W., Stary, C. (2020). Modeling Languages. In: Contextual Process Digitalization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38300-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38300-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38299-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38300-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)