Abstract
Predicting earthquakes is a long-desired goal. The main challenge is to identify precursory signals that reliably predict the impending earthquake. Since hydrological and hydrogeochemical properties and processes can be very sensitive to minute strains, the hope is that measurements from hydrological systems might record precursory rock deformation that would otherwise be undetectable. Of the many hundreds of studies, we review a subset to illustrate how signals can be challenging to interpret and highlight questions raised by observations—examples come from China, Japan, Taiwan, India, the USA, Russia, France, Italy and Iceland. All are retrospective studies. Some signals seem to have no other explanation than being precursory, however, rarely is enough data available to undertake a thorough analysis. Some hydrological precursors might be recording deformation events that are slower than traditional earthquakes (and hence usually harder to detect). Long times series of data are critical for both identifying putative precursors and assessing their origin and reliability.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
13.1 Introduction
Earthquake prediction is an enduring goal. The key challenge is to recognize precursory signals that would foretell the occurrence of earthquakes and hence allow a warning to be issued. For this reason, the search for precursors to earthquakes has a long history. Despite early optimism (Scholtz et al. 1973), we are not yet able to predict earthquakes—a successful prediction being defined here as some combination of time, location and magnitude within some stated and useful limits.
There are, however, mechanical reasons for anticipating precursors. Laboratory studies of rock deformation show that beyond the elastic limit, shearing of consolidated rock creates microcracks that open and hence increase the rock volume (e.g., Brace et al. 1966). At still higher deviatoric stresses, microcracks merge and localize to form a shear zone, leading to eventual large-scale rupture (e.g., Lockner and Beeler 2002). There are several ways in which the mechanical changes leading up to rupture can be manifest in hydrological measurements. First, the increase in surface area produced by microcracks can release gases trapped in pores (e.g., radon) or change the ionic concentration and hence electrical conductivity of groundwater. Such possible changes provide the motivation for seeking and interpreting changes in gas concentration, hydrogeochemistry, or electrical conductivity. Second, microcracks can change hydrogeologic properties such as permeability as well as pore pressure. Such changes, in turn, can cause a redistribution of fluids and fluid pressure and hence may be detected from changes in water level in wells or changes in spring and stream discharge.
As reviewed in previous chapters, hydrogeologic systems can greatly magnify minute tectonic and seismic strains, as recorded by changes in pore pressure and water level in wells. For example, the change in pore pressure p under undrained conditions is given by (see also Eq. 3.25)
where \(K_{u}\) is the undrained bulk modulus and B is Skempton’s coefficient. A volumetric strain \(\varepsilon_{kk}\) as small as 10−8 can be expected to produce (detectable) water changes of 2 cm for reasonable choices of B = 1 and \(K_{u}\) = 20 GPa (Wang 2000). It is in part because of the potential sensitivity of hydrogeological systems that much of the search for precursors has focused on hydrological measurements. In addition, hydrological measurements can be made with relative ease (compared with electromagnetic and seismic surveys) and can be recorded continuously.
The hydrogeochemical basis for searching for precursors is similar. The gas composition of springs, for example, can respond to (small) tidal strains (e.g., Sugisaki 1981), hence any preseismic strain might be amplified in hydrogeochemical changes. Radon concentration changes are among the most commonly reported and discussed hydrogeochemical precursors (e.g., King 1980; Wakita et al. 1988; Virk and Singh 1993; Richon et al. 2003; Oh and Kim 2015; Fu et al. 2017; Papachristodoulou et al. 2020) and geochemical recorder of small strains (e.g., Trique et al. 1999; Kawabata et al. 2020)—this is not unreasonable given that radon accumulates over time in micropores, and can be released by small structural changes in rocks and pore connectivity. Small strains may also permit mixing between reservoirs by breaching barriers, or may expose fresh mineral surfaces which in turn permit water–rock interaction (e.g., Thomas 1988). In a manner similar to hydrological recovery after co-seismic hydrological changes (stream flow, water level in wells), water geochemistry also exhibits a postseismic recovery if disturbed by the earthquake (e.g., Claesson et al. 2007).
The elastic properties of rocks, and hence the velocities of seismic waves, are highly sensitive to the opening and closing of microcracks and to the changes in their degree of saturation (e.g., O’Connell and Budiansky 1974). Laboratory measurements confirm that precursory changes in wave speed occur for the full spectrum of fault failure, from slow events to normal earthquakes (Scuderi et al. 2016). Seismologists have carried out various experiments to test the microcrack hypothesis and produced a series of controversial results over the past 50 years. The first published works of such tests were carried out by Kondratenko and Nersesov (1962) for earthquakes in the Tadjikistan region and by Semenov (1969) for earthquakes near Garm, both in the former Soviet Union. These reports were initially met with skepticism by seismologists in Japan and the United States (Bolt and Wang 1975). Nevertheless, the work was sufficiently suggestive to motivate other seismologists to set out independent experiments to examine the claims. The first U.S. experiments along these lines, using quite small earthquakes in the Adirondacks in New York, also detected reductions in the Vp/Vs ratio in three cases (Aggarwal et al. 1973). After the 1971 San Fernando earthquake (magnitude 6.5), Whitcomb et al. (1973) concluded that there had been a precursory decrease in the Vp/Vs ratio lasting about 30 months and a subsequent return to normal, which was followed quickly by the earthquake. On the other hand, McEvilly and Johnson (1974) used travel times between quarry blasts in central California along the San Andreas fault, with known position and origin time, and the University of California seismic network; their study indicated that the recorded fluctuations in travel times for the years 1961–1973 could be accounted for simply by reading errors and changes of shot location in the quarry. They concluded that there were no detectable premonitory travel-time changes prior to 17 earthquakes in the region with magnitudes between 4.5 and 5.4. Later work in the region (Robinson et al. 1974) showed, however, that positive P residuals were detectable before the 1972 M5.1 Bear Valley earthquake (magnitude 5.1). Wang (1974) interpreted these conflicting observations in terms of laboratory evidence that seismic velocities in stressed rocks are significantly affected by the relative orientation between seismic waves and microcracks; thus the conflicting observations in different field experiments may be partly explained by different relationships between the seismic ray path and the free surface in the source region, which controls the direction of stress-induced crustal microcracks. Niu et al. (2008) conducted an active source cross-well experiment at the San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth (SAFOD) drill site and studied the shear wave travel time along a fixed pathway for three small earthquakes (M ≤ 3) over a period of 2 months. They show excursions in the travel time before two of these earthquakes, but no excursion before the third. In summary, there is a physical basis for expecting precursors, precursors are seen in the lab, yet earthquake prediction outside the lab remains elusive.
13.2 What is a Precursor?
We begin by defining a “precursor” as a change in a measured quantity that occurs prior to an earthquake that does not originate from any process other than those that lead to the earthquake. Reported hydrological examples include changes in water pressure, streamflow, and water geochemistry and turbidity.
A useful precursor is one that also predicts the time, location and size of the forthcoming earthquake. To our knowledge, no paper has claimed to make these three predictions based on reported hydrological anomalies, noting that the peer review process may be slow compared to the warning time offered by precursory signals.
13.3 Identifying Precursors
Definitive and consistent evidence for hydrological and hydrogeochemical precursors has remained elusive to the extent that there is no consensus on the significance and origin of reported precursors. Earthquake prediction is not currently operational. Difficulties include that, until recently, most reported changes were not corrected for the fluctuations in temperature, barometric pressure, earth tides, and other environmental factors, so that some changes taken to be earthquake-related may in fact be “noise'’ (e.g., Hartmann and Levy 2005). One common feature of reports is that changes are recorded at some sites but not at other nearby sites (e.g., Biagi et al. 2000). Moreover, instrument failures and personnel/program changes often do not allow persistent and consistent monitoring over long periods of time (King et al. 1994)—a necessary condition for obtaining reliable precursory data. Distinguishing a precursor from a response to a previous earthquake creates additional and unavoidable ambiguity.
Roeloffs (1988) lists the ideal, and arguably necessary, criteria and complementary data for establishing that some signal is in fact precursory. We reproduce (sometimes paraphrased or modified slightly) her list below and then comment of some of these criteria. As noted by Roeloffs (1988), poor documentation is the major impediment to using and interpreting water level data.
-
(1)
Depth of well
-
(2)
Rainfall over at least one year
-
(3)
Record of barometric pressure recorded at least once every three hours
-
(4)
Information about pumping and injection at wells in the vicinity
-
(5)
The entire observation record should be presented
-
(6)
Measurement technique (e.g., pressure transducer, float)
-
(7)
Sampling interval; this should be short enough to reliably distinguish between anomalies before and after the earthquake (Sugisaki 1978)
-
(8)
Response to earth tides
-
(9)
Co-seismic and post seismic response to the earthquake
-
(10)
Earthquake magnitude, azimuth, distance, depth and focal mechanism
-
(11)
Time, location and magnitude of any foreshocks
-
(12)
Raw water level data (unprocessed)
-
(13)
Description of other wells in the area that did not document the anomaly.
Roeloffs (1988) also points out that site geology, in particular the proximity to fault zones, and whether the aquifer is confined, are useful for interpreting any signals. For gas or hydrogeochemical anomalies, multiple measurements of ions and gases are helpful in identifying the origin and reliability of the anomaly (Sugisaki and Sugiura 1985).
The importance of removing signals that arise from tides and barometric pressure variations is highlighted in Fig. 13.1 in which raw water level records are compared with records in which the effects of tides and barometric pressure changes are removed. The coseismic water level response becomes much clearer. In addition, two pre-seismic anomalous changes become apparent (discussed in more detail later).
Notwithstanding these difficulties, progress has been made in the past decade. For example, intensive and continued observations of various kinds of precursory hydrological and hydrogeochemical changes have been made in Japan during the past half century (Wakita 1996), providing a long time series of observations. Records are now routinely corrected to remove the noise introduced by fluctuations in temperature, barometric pressure, earth tides, and other factors (Igarashi and Wakita 1995). Tools are readily available to remove the effects of earth tides and barometric pressure variations (e.g., BAYTAP-G). The importance of these corrections should be clear from all the raw records presented in this chapter. Other signal processing techniques can be helpful. For example, high- and low-pass filtering has been applied to the time series of raw hydrogeochemical data in Kamchatka, Russia, to remove long- and short-period changes unrelated to earthquake processes (Kingsley et al. 2001).
Effort has also been made to address the statistical significance of possible precursors. Statistical, rather than deterministic, procedures have been introduced (Maeda and Yoshida 1990) to assess the conditional probability of future seismic events. Multi-component, hydrochemistry analysis was applied to groundwater samples in Iceland before and after a major earthquake to enhance the possibility of detecting possible precursors (Claesson et al. 2004). Highlighting the importance of long time series, Claesson et al. (2007) extended the time series of geochemical measurements after this and subsequent earthquakes and found that the statistical significance of previously identified anomalies could not be verified.
13.4 Examples
There are hundreds of reports of possible earthquake precursors. Here we review and discuss only selected studies to (1) illustrate the range of types of measurements that have been made, (2) highlight the challenges with identifying precursors, and (3) identify some of the key questions raised by reported precursor identifications. In all but one of the examples that we discuss, the hydrological changes are identified retrospectively as being premonitory to the earthquake.
Reviews of reported hydrologic precursors include Roeloffs (1988) and Hartmann and Levy (2005). Hydrogeochemical precursor reviews include Hauksson (1981), Thomas (1988), Toutain and Baubron (1999), Woith (2015), and Martinelli and Dadomo (2018).
13.4.1 China: Haicheng, 1975 and Tangshan, 1976
The most celebrated and first (indeed only, as far as we know) prediction of a large earthquake was the 1975 magnitude 7.3 Haicheng earthquake in China. Based in part on hundreds of hydrological anomalies, a prediction of an imminent earthquake was made. Evacuations and preparations in Haicheng, with a population of about 1 million, contributed in part to the modest number of casualties, just over 2000. The prediction correctly identified the location, though not the precise time, of the event, and the magnitude was underestimated (Wang et al. 2006).
One and a half years later, the 1976 M 7.8 Tangshan earthquake occurred without the issuance of a prediction. Figure 13.2 shows the distribution of anomalies and time histories of radon concentration, groundwater level, land level and electrical resistivity in the region around Tangshan before and after the earthquake (Ma et al. 1990). The fact that no prediction was issued, despite the abundance of potentially precursory anomalies, highlights the difficulty in making predictions. Casualties from this earthquake exceeded 240,000.
13.4.2 Kobe, Japan, 1995
Following the 1995 M 7.2 Kobe earthquake several papers reported precursory changes in the concentrations of radon, chlorine, and sulfate ions in groundwater (e.g., Tsunogai and Wakita 1995; Igarashi et al. 1995) and in groundwater level (King et al. 1995). The hydrogeochemical changes could be identified by analyzing bottled spring water (Tsunogai and Wakita 1995). Figure 13.3 shows a gradual increase in chloride concentration that begins 7 months before the earthquake. The initiation of these changes coincides with a “drastic” increase in strain measured 5 km away from the well (Tsunogai and Wakita 1995). This coincidence supports a broader tectonic origin of the pre-earthquake changes. However, whether the deformation responsible for hydrogeochemical changes and strain is connected to the later Kobe earthquake is difficult to evaluate. Given the length of the proposed precursory signal, a longer time series of measurements would be useful for establishing the uniqueness of the recorded changes.
13.4.3 Nankaido, Japan, 1946
A few days prior to the 1946 M 8.3 Nankaido earthquake in Japan, water levels in some wells reportedly fell by more than 1 m and some wells went dry (Sato 1982). Linde and Sacks (2002) show that the pre-seismic deformation (observations reviewed in Roeloffs 2006) can be explained by aseismic slip along the subduction interface. This area is now intensively monitored with 1200 continuous GPS stations. This data (Ozawa et al. 2002) along with leveling and tide-gauge data document other aseismic slip events (importantly, not followed by large earthquakes) in the region. Multiple and large aseismic events highlight the caution that a correlation of strain and hydrologic changes does not necessarily reflect deformation leading directly to a major earthquake, but possibly document events that may remain purely aseismic.
The 1946 event was preceded by the 1944 M 8.2 Tonankai event, creating some ambiguity about whether the reported changes are responses or premonitory. Measured hydrological changes can lag behind tectonic strains (e.g., Ben-Zion et al. 1990) because of the time required for pore pressure diffusion.
13.4.4 Oxygen Isotope Precursors to the 2016 Tottori Earthquake, Japan
The magnitude 6.6 Tottori earthquake, Japan, occurred on October 21, 2016. It was a shallow strike-slip earthquake. Onda et al. (2018), following the analysis done after the Kobe earthquake (Sect. 13.4.2), analyzed commercially bottled water extracted from a 240 m deep aquifer. The well is only ~5 km from the fault that ruptured. Water isotopes show annual modulation. When this signal is removed (Fig. 13.4), Onda et al. (2018) identify an anomaly in oxygen isotopes prior to the earthquake that is not seen in hydrogen isotopes. Oxygen isotope changes not accompanied by changes in hydrogen isotopes are most easily explained by increasing water–rock interaction. Here this would be the release of water that experienced more extensive reaction with rocks than the bulk of the water in the sampled aquifer. Onda et al. (2018) performed rock crushing experiments to quantify the expected changes in water isotopes, and inferred a plausible 10−7 volumetric strain, though there is no geodetic data documenting that such strains did in fact occur. Missing in this analysis are complementary data of water pressure and temperature—if fluids are being released from precursory volumetric strains, pore pressure and temperature may increase (though in Chap. 9 we showed that the velocity required to affect solute composition is lower than that requires to change pore pressure and still lower than that required to change temperature). This study highlights the value of an archive of data from regular water sampling.
13.4.5 Kettleman Hills, California, 1985
Three days before the 1985 M 6.1 Kettleman Hill, California earthquake, Roeloffs and Quilty (1997) found a gradual, anomalous rise in water level of about 3 cm in 2 of 4 wells in the nearby Parkfield area. These changes are shown in Fig. 13.1. Barometric pressure changes and rainfall cannot explain these changes. One of these two wells exhibited several similar changes that were not followed by earthquakes. In the second, however, the documented increase was unique during the 5 year monitoring period. Figure 13.1 shows that the sign of these possible precursory changes is opposite to the coseismic change implying that they are not caused by accelerating pre-seismic slip.
This observation was included in the IASPEI Preliminary List of Significant Precursors (Wyss and Booth 1997). Nevertheless, important questions remain. What caused the anomalies? Why are they not recorded everywhere?
13.4.6 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999
Abundant monitoring data in Taiwan provided a host of opportunities to look for precursors to the September 21, 2009 magnitude 7.7 Chi-Chi earthquake. Chen et al. (2015) report anomalous decreases in water level across the Choshuichi alluvial fan for approximately 100–200 days prior to the earthquake (Fig. 13.5). Using the network of monitoring wells, they show that this pattern is widespread and is at least qualitatively consistent with geodetic measurements of strain. It is not immediately clear that the anomalies are unique given that the time series is limited to only a few times longer than the duration of the anomaly. The time leading up to the earthquake was also marked by a late onset of the rainy season which would have contributed to lower water levels, though the magnitude of the changes seems too large to be due solely to a reduction in recharge.
Another reported possible precursor to the Chi-Chi earthquake is a change in the spectral characteristics of water level fluctuations in some wells in the month preceding the earthquake compared with those 2 and 3 months before the earthquake (Gau et al. 2007). This is not a compelling comparison as the amount and character of precipitation also changed (Fig. 13.5). As discussed in Sect. 9.3 and Roeloffs (1988), the full range of relevant environmental factors must be considered. Given the long-term memory and variability of hydrogeological systems, time series analysis should be undertaken for more than three months to assess the reliability of the analysis techniques in isolating seasonal effects, long term trends, and irregular variations. A longer analysis could also identify the uniqueness of the reported precursory change—an essential attribute of any precursor.
King and Chia (2018) report a large and rapid increase in streamflow 4 days before the earthquake. A nearby well showed an anomalous rise two days before the earthquake and a 4 cm drop three hours before the earthquake. They attribute these changes to pre-earthquake shallow slow slip events that created fractures enabling fluid migration. The authors do not report any independent geodetic data that confirm the inferred slow slip. The explanation does make a testable (in principle) prediction that there should be permeability changes.
Song et al. (2006) analyzed the composition of water at hot and artesian springs in Taiwan. Large, reversible anomalies in Cl– or SO42– were identified over a few year period. At the hot springs, a couple anomalies precede earthquakes; however, anomalies do not exist before all earthquakes, and there is no correlation between the intensity of the shaking and the occurrence of precursory anomalies. Moreover, some anomalies are not followed by earthquakes. The artesian springs document postseismic changes, but these do not occur for all earthquakes and the occurrence of a response does not seem to be correlated with the intensity of shaking. Despite these severe limitations, Song et al. (2006) nevertheless claim that these springs are possibly ideal sites for recording precursors.
Some of the reported hydrologic “precursors” to the Chi-Chi earthquake are interesting as cautionary tales. One example of a “precursor” was claimed shortly after the earthquake. The earthquake occurred at 1:47 a.m., 21 September, local time. 59 of the 157 monitoring wells that showed stepwise changes in groundwater level reported times of these change between the hour of 11 p.m., 20 September 20, and 1 a.m., 21 September. In other words, these records showed stepwise changes in groundwater level about 1 to 3 h before the earthquake. If true and repeated for other earthquakes, these would be ideal precursors. Careful examination and verification of the clock of the recording instruments in the field and inspection of the information management process (Chia et al. 2000), however, necessitated a readjustment of the time-axis of the entire groundwater-level records. After corrections were made, all the “precursors” turned out to be co-seismic responses. A second example of misidentified precursors is illustrated in Fig. 13.6. The stepwise changes in groundwater level in four wells two weeks before the Chi-Chi earthquake could be mistaken as “precursory”. These changes, however, turn out to be a result of readjustment of the recording instruments (Y. Chia, personal communication). Both examples highlight the importance of (1) using a common time-base for the hydrologic and seismic records, and (2) documenting all instrumental changes as part of the hydrologic records.
13.4.7 Kamchatka
Long term hydrogeochemical records are available in Kamchatka, an area with many large earthquakes. Biagi et al. (2006) illustrate a clear postseismic response in a spring following a M 7.1 earthquake about 100 km away—Fig. 13.7 shows this response. Biagi et al. (2006) also show that following this earthquake the spectral characteristics of the hydrogeochemical variations change, with an increase in short period variability. Biagi et al. (2006), expanding on Biagi et al. (2000), further claim that variations in other components, in particular H2 and CO2, are precursory—their amplitude fluctuations decrease after the earthquake. We offer an alternative explanation for these changes and instead propose that they too are postseismic changes—the earthquake-created changes in hydraulic connectivity that lead to the changes shown in Fig. 13.7 are also responsible for the character changes in H2 and CO2.
With a long record of hydrogeochemical monitoring and many earthquakes, Kamchatka offers an opportunity to test approaches to identifying precursors. Kingsley et al. (2001) identified as precursory, any signals that exceed 3 standard deviations of the mean and that are seen at the same time (within 7 days) in at least 2 measurements. With this criterion, they identify 8 precursors (anomalies within 158 days of the earthquake) and 3 failures (anomalies not followed by earthquakes) for a time period with 5 large (magnitudes between 6.9 and 7.3) earthquakes. With a more restrictive criterion that anomalies are confined to ion data alone, Biagi et al. (2001) identify 3 anomalies, all of which are followed by earthquakes (the three closest large earthquakes to the wells). Examining their data (Fig. 2 in Biagi et al. 2001), however, shows that there are correlated anomalies slightly smaller than 3 standard deviations that are not followed by earthquakes. Moreover, as the 5 large earthquakes occurred within less than a 5 year period, and correlated anomalies (greater than 3 sigma) occur every year or so, we thus expect that roughly half of identified precursory anomalies would fall within the 158 day time window simply by chance. Once again, we are left with several questions: what caused these anomalies? why are some wells (apparently) more sensitive? What is the statistical significance of the anomalies?
13.4.8 Pyrenees, France, 1996
Toutain et al. (1997) analyzed the composition of bottled and dated spring water, as done following the 1995 Kobe earthquake (Tsunogai and Wakita 1996), to document the pre- and postseismic response of groundwater to a M 5.2 earthquake in the French Pyrenees. The spring is located 29 km from the epicenter. As shown in Fig. 13.8, about 5 days before the earthquake, the chloride concentration increased by about 40%, an increase much larger than the standard deviation of pre-seismic values (at least over the 200 days analyzed). The high chloride values persisted for about another 5 days and then returned to “normal”. Poitrasson et al. (1999) documented a lead anomaly in the same waters, also shown in Fig. 13.8. The lead anomaly has a shorter duration and is more than 10 times background values. The lead isotope changes suggest an anthropogenic source.
Toutain et al. (1997) propose that a small amount of chloride-rich water was injected into the aquifer feeding the springs—measured changes reflect mixing of previously isolated waters. The lead anomaly is not consistent with the possible sources for the chloride anomaly (Poitrasson et al. 1999), implying a third source of water. It is not clear why the start and end of the documented changes are so abrupt because dispersion should lead to more gradual changes, especially during the post-seismic period.
13.4.9 Reservoir Induced Seismicity, Koyna, India
Chadha et al. (2003) report on an experiment to search for precursors to the reservoir-induced earthquakes near the Koyna and Warna reservoirs, India. The project involved drilling 19 wells for monitoring purposes. In addition to coseismic water level changes, Chadha et al. (2003) identify small, centimeter-scale, changes in water levels over periods of days to many days before earthquakes with magnitudes between 4.3 and 5.2 and within distances of 24 km.
Figure 13.9 shows an example of two of the premonitory changes, including the raw data and barometric pressure. The coseimic signal and possible precursory anomalies are dwarfed by the response to tides and barometric pressure. After removing effects of tides and barometric pressure changes, a coseismic and postseismic response become clear. This study does not address the uniqueness of the proposed precursor anomalies. Inspection of Fig. 13.9 and other figures in this paper shows that similar anomalies occur and are not followed by earthquakes. Other questions remain about these purported precursors: Why don’t all wells record the same anomalies? Why is the time duration of the anomalies different from earthquake-to-earthquake?
Complementary hydrogeochemical and water level measurements have now been made at 15 wells for >12 years, beginning in 2005 (Reddy et al. 2017). No precursory signals are seen before earthquakes with magnitude <5. There are long term trends in water chemistry along with annual variations in water level—with no clear or repeatable patterns of changes before or after earthquakes.
13.4.10 Calistoga Geyser, California
As discussed in Chap. 11, geyers can be especially sensitive to small earthquake-generated strains. Silver and Vallette-Silver (1992) analyzed 18 years of eruptions at the Old Faithful, Calistoga, California geyser. During this period, they documented three clear responses to regional earthquakes, as manifested in changes in the interval between eruption (IBE, the most common measure, as discussed in Chap. 11, of geyser response) or the distribution of IBE. Two earthquakes caused an increase in IBE. The third caused a change in the mode of eruption, from a single IBE to multiple IBEs. These three earthquakes are consistent with a magnitude-distance threshold similar to other hydrological responses (Fig. 14.4).
Silver and Vallette-Silver (1992) also propose that there are precursory changes in IBE that begin days before these three regional earthquakes. The data in this paper, however, clearly show many features similar to the proposed precursory changes that were not followed by earthquakes. We believe that the statistical analysis in this paper significantly underestimates the number of times the IBE changes character, by perhaps 1–2 orders of magnitude, over the monitored period.
13.4.11 Iceland, 2012–2013
Four to six months before a magnitude 5.6 earthquake in Iceland, there were hydrogen isotope and major ion changes (Fig. 13.10) in a 100 m deep artesian well (Skelton et al. 2014). Continued monitoring documented large hydrogeochemical responses to the earthquake (Fig. 9.2; Skelton et al. 2019). There are several abrupt changes in oxygen isotopes over the several year period with data (Fig. 13.10b), which suggests that permeable paths switch over time (Fig. 9.10). No water pressure data are available to quantify permeability changes. Statistical tests of the hydrogen isotope and Na concentration data show that excursions prior to the earthquake are not random, leading Skelton et al. (2014) to conclude that the changes are probable precursors. They, however, “make no claim of being able to predict earthquakes” and instead highlight that groundwater chemistry is a “promising target for future earthquake prediction studies”.
Iceland hosts abundant seismic and volcanic activity. Magma movement in the subsurface and volcanic eruptions create earthquakes, deform the crust and hence can change permeability, and discharge gases and aqueous fluids. In fact, eruption precursors at volcanoes are widespread and play a role in forecasting volcanic eruptions (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2017). An alternative interpretation of the hydrogeochemical data is thus that both the geochemical changes and the earthquakes are responses to magma movement (Ingebritsen and Manga 2014).
13.4.12 Central Italy Seismic Sequence, 2016
Several magnitude 6 earthquakes occurred in the central Apennines, Italy in 2016. A few months before the seismic swarm, there were anomalous changes in trace element concentrations, specifically As, V and Fe, in springs (Fig. 13.11). There were also large hydrogeochemical and water level responses to the earthquakes (and no unambiguous water level precursors). Barberio et al. (2017) attribute the geochemical changes to an influx of deep hydrothermal fluids or fluids mobilized from deep organic-rich units and hence that the changes are recording permeability changes. Those same permeability changes could redistribute pore pressure and hence promote seismicity. These inferences would certainly benefit from co-located pore pressure measurements at depth along with a longer time series to decipher annual variations and long-term trends. Since the earthquakes are between 57 and 96 km away from the springs, the inferred connections must reflect regional changes in strain.
Water pressure and electrical conductivity are also monitored at high frequency (50 Hz) in boreholes around the deep underground Gran Sasso laboratory in central Italy. Five days, and perhaps as long as 40 days, before the 24 August 2016 magnitude 6 Amatrice event, De Luca et al. (2018) document significant changes in the kurtosis and skewness of pressure fluctuations. They also document large pressure changes after the earthquake. They attribute precursory changes to microfracturing that leads to high frequency pressure changes and upflow of gases. If De Luca et al. (2018) have indeed documented a precursor, their results suggest that very high frequency sampling might be needed to identify the precursory signals.
13.4.13 Precursory Changes in Spring Temperature
In Chap. 8 we discussed the co- and post-seismic changes in temperature of a well on the Izu Penisula, Japan (Mogi et al. 1989). At this well, rapid increases in temperature of 1–2 °C typically accompany regional earthquakes. Following earthquakes, temperature decreases approximately linearly. Also of note is a correlation of temperature changes with tides and barometric pressure, with magnitudes up to 0.5 °C. Mogi et al. (1989) attributed these trends to be the result of unblocking, followed by gradual resealing, of fractures.
For a small number of earthquakes, as many as 5, there are abnormal changes in temperature, defined as changes that are not coseismic, do not follow the linear trend of decreasing temperature, and do not appear to be related to tides or weather. Mogi et al. (1989) referred to such abnormal changes as precursory. The changes occur between 3 days and 10 months before regional earthquakes. In one case, the precursory changes are coincident with a regional earthquake swarm.
As with other claimed precursors, there is no obvious predictive feature—the abnormal signals differ in form, timing, and do not always occur. Figs. 7 and 9 in Mogi et al. (1989) also show abnormal changes not followed by earthquakes.
One possible explanation for the abnormal changes is that they are in fact responses to tectonic events—the “precursory” response coincident with a regional earthquake swarm being an example. There is a wide range of earthquake phenomena, particularly in subduction zone settings, in which slip does not only generate regular earthquakes (Beroza and Ide 2011). These events differ in the duration of the slip event, which can range from seconds for very-low frequency earthquakes (e.g., Ito et al. 2005), to hours for slow earthquakes (e.g., Linde et al. 1996) to days for slow-slip events (e.g., Hirose and Obara 2005) to many months for silent earthquakes (e.g., Dragert et al. 2001; Ozawa et al. 2002; Kostoglodov et al. 2003). Such events are common in Japan and other subduction zones (Ide et al. 2007), but also occur along strike-slip faults such as the San Andreas in California (e.g., Linde et al. 1996) and at volcanoes (e.g., Segall et al. 2006).
If the “precursory” changes reported by Mogi et al. (1989) are in fact responses to slower slip events than regular earthquakes, it suggests the changes are more sensitive to the magnitude of strain rather than dynamic strains. At the same time, this also implies that “precursors” are not useful for forecasting as not all slow earthquakes are followed by regular (and damaging) earthquakes.
13.5 Outlook
There are several restrospective reports of hydrological changes preceding earthquakes that appear to have no other obvious explanation. In few cases, however, do criteria meet those needed for critical evaluation—those listed in Sect. 13.2 and Roeloffs (1988). To identify these changes as precursory in a useful way also requires a criterion for distinguishing them from non-precursors before the actual earthquake occurs. Given the lack of success in using hydrological and hydrogeochemical anomalies to predict earthquakes (including all three desired features: size, location and date) it is not surprising that earthquake prediction is not the focus of modern seismology. Some readers may be surprised by our skepticism about some reported precursors and our critical assessment of the observations and data analysis. However, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof (if not at least attention to, and documentation of, details); the ability to predict earthquakes certainly qualifies as an “extraordinary claim”.
Hydrological precursors to earthquakes, if they exist, can be thought of as being a subset of a broad range of transient phenomena that includes silent and slow earthquakes, transient creep, episodic tremor and slip, and seismic swarms. Such transient phenomena occur more often and provide more measurement opportunities. Consequently, their study may prove insightful about earthquake initiation and the types and origins of possible hydrological phenomena that can be mistaken as precursors to normal earthquakes.
Multiparametric monitoring is particularly important both for identifying spurious anomalies and understanding the origin of hydrological changes. Combined deformation and water level measurements have proven useful to understand the spatio-temporal relationship between transient hydrological changes and deformation (e.g., Ben-Zion et al. 1990) and to support the identification of hydrological precursors (Roeloffs and Quilty 1997). Long-term and multi-parameter monitoring requires investment and patience, but both are probably required to assess whether there are precursors and to establish the statistical significance of signals. Woith (2015) reviewed more than 100 studies that report radon precursors and found a negative correlation between the number of anomalies and the length of the time series analyzed. Woith (2015) concluded that tectonic anomalies probably exist but may be indistinguishable from non-tectonic anomalies. Advances in machine learning may help tease out signals that are otherwise challenging to recognize (e.g., Rouet-Leduc et al. 2017; Asim et al. 2018).
The now widespread use of ambient noise to monitor temporal changes in seismic velocity is opening up new opportunities for documenting changes in elastic properties, including responses to earthquakes (e.g., Brenguier et al. 2008; Nakata and Snieder 2011; Gassenmeier et al. 2016; Nimiya et al. 2017), creep (e.g., Hillers et al. 2019), healing of faults (e.g., Pei et al. 2019), and long term trends that may be recording an evolving stress state (e.g., Ikeda and Tsuji 2018; Taira et al. 2018). Connecting such monitoring to hydrological and hydrogeochemical data may prove especially useful for interpreting anomalies and identifying reliable precursory signals.
Although we may still be far from achieving a complete understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the various earthquake-related anomalies that are reported in the literature, there remain significant monitoring efforts. A negative result, such as the absence of clear precursory signals at the multiparametric and densely monitored Parkfield, California site (Bakun et al. 2005), may frustrate the effort to predict earthquakes, but provides important and useful constraints on models of rupture initiation and other tectonic processes that lead up to earthquakes. There still remains a physical basis for expecting precursory signals, and lab experiments confirm that that expectation holds in the lab.
References
Aggarwal YP, Sykes LR, Armbruster J, Sbar ML (1973) Premonitory changes in seismic velocities and prediction of earthquakes. Nature 241:101–104
Asim KM, Idris A, Iqbal T, Martinez-Alvarez F (2018) Seismic indicators based earthquake predictor system using Genetic Programming and AdaBoost classification. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 111:1–7
Bakun WH, Aagard B, Dost B et al (2005) Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2005 Parkfield earthquake. Nature 437:969–974
Barberio MD, Barbieri M, Billi A et al (2017) Hydrogeochemical changes before and during the 2016 Amatrice-Norcia seismic sequence (central Italy). Sci Rep 7(1):1–12
Ben-Zion Y, Henyey TL, Leary PC, Lund SP (1990) Observations and implications of water level and creepmeter anomalies in the Mojave segment of the San Andreas fault. Bull Seism Soc Am 80:1661–1676
Beroza GC, Ide S (2011) Slow earthquakes and nonvolcanic tremor. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 39:271–296
Biagi PF, Picolo R, Ermini A et al (2001) Hydrogeochemical precursors of strin earthquakes in Kamchatka: further analysis. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 1:9–14
Biagi PF, Castellana L, Minafra A et al (2006) Groundwater chemical anomalies connected with the Kamchatka earthquake (M=7.1) on March 1992. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:853–859
Biagi PF, Ermini A, Kingsley SP et al (2000) Groundwater ion content precursors of strong earthquakes in Kamchatka (Russia). PAGEOPH 157:302–320
Bolt BA, Wang CY (1975) The present status of earthquake prediction. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 5:125–151
Brace WF, Paulding J, Scholz C (1966) Dilatancy in the fracture of crystalline rocks. J Geophys Res 71:3939–3953
Brenguier F, Shapiro NM, Campillo M et al (2008) Towards forecasting volcanic eruptions using seismic noise. Nat Geosci 1(2):126–130
Chadha RK, Pandey AP, Kuempel HJ (2003) Search for earthquake precursors in well water levels in a localized seismically active area of reservoir triggered earthquakes in India. Geophys Res Lett 30:1416. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016694
Chen CH, Tang CC, Cheng KC et al (2015) Groundwater–strain coupling before the 1999 Mw 7.6 Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake. J Hydrol 524:378–384
Chia Y, Wang YS, Wu HP et al (2000) Changes of ground water level in response to the Chi-Chi earthquake. International workshop on annual commemoration of Chi-Chi earthquake. National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, pp 317–328
Claesson L, Skelton A, Graham C et al (2004) Hydrogeochemical changes before and after a major earthquake. Geology 32:641–644
Claesson L, Skelton A, Graham C, Morth M (2007) The timescale and mechanisms of fault sealing and water-rock interaction after an earthquake. Geofluids 7:427–440
De Luca G, Di Carlo G, Tallini M (2018) A record of changes in the Gran Sasso groundwater before, during and after the 2016 Amatrice earthquake, central Italy. Sci Rep 8(1):1–16
Dragert H, Wang K, James TS (2001) A silent slip event on the deeper Cascadia subduction interface. Science 292:1525–1528
Fu CC, Yang TF, Tsai MC et al (2017) Exploring the relationship between soil degassing and seismic activity by continuous radon monitoring in the Longitudinal Valley of eastern Taiwan. Chem Geol 469:163–175
Gassenmeier M, Sens-Schönfelder C, Eulenfeld T et al (2016) Field observations of seismic velocity changes caused by shaking-induced damage and healing due to mesoscopic nonlinearity. Geophys J Int 204(3):1490–1502
Gau HS, Chin T-C, Chen J-S, Liu, C.-W, (2007) Time series decomposition of groundwater level changes in wells due to the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan: a possible hydrological precursor to earthquakes. Hydrol Proc 21:510–524
Hartmann J, Levy JK (2005) Hydrogeological and gasgeochemical earthquake precursors—a review for application. Nat. Hazards 34:279–304
Hauksson E (1981) Radon content of groundwater as an earthquake precursor: evaluation of worldwide data and physical basis. J Geophys Res 86:9397–9410
Hillers G, Campillo M, Brenguier F et al (2019) Seismic velocity change patterns along the San Jacinto Fault Zone following the 2010 M 7.2 El Mayor‐Cucapah and M 5.4 Collins Valley earthquakes. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 124(7):7171–7192
Hirose H, Obara K (2005) Repeating short- and long-term slow slip events with deep tremor activity, around the Bungo channel region, southwest Japan. Earth Planets Space 57:961–972
Ide S, Beroza GC, Shelly DR, Uchide T (2007) A scaling law for slow earthquakes. Nature 447:76–79
Igarashi G, Wakita H (1995) Geochemical and hydrological observations for earthquake prediction in Japan. J Phys Earth 43:585–596
Igarashi G, Saeki S, Takahata N et al (1995) Groundwater radon anomaly before the Kobe earthquake in Japan. Science 269:60–61
Ikeda T, Tsuji T (2018) Temporal change in seismic velocity associated with an offshore MW 5.9 Off-Mie earthquake in the Nankai subduction zone from ambient noise cross-correlation. Prog Earth Planet Sci 5(1):1–12
Ingebritsen SE, Manga M (2014) Earthquakes: hydrogeochemical precursors. Nat Geosci 7(10):697–698
Ito Y, Obara K, Shiomi K, Sekine S, Hirose H (2005) Slow earthquakes coincident with episodic tremors and slow slip events. Science 296:503–506
Kawabata K, Sato T, Takahashi HA et al (2020) Changes in groundwater radon concentrations caused by the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake. J Hydrol 584:124712
King C-Y (1980) Episodic radon changes in subsurface soil gas along active faults and possible relation to earthquakes. J Geophys Res 85:3065–3078
King C-Y, Chia Y (2018) Anomalous streamflow and groundwater-level changes before the 1999 M7. 6 Chi–Chi earthquake in Taiwan: possible mechanisms. Pure Appl Geophys 175(7):2435–2444
King C-Y, Basler D, Presser TS et al (1994) In search of earthquake-related hydrologic and chemical changes along the Hayward fault. Appl Geochem 9:83–91
King C-Y, Koizumi N, Kitigawa Y (1995) Hydrogeochemical anomalies and the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Science 269:38–39
Kingsley SP, Biagi PF, Ermini A et al (2001) Hydrogeochemical precursors of strong earthquakes: a realistic possibility in Kamchatka. Phys Chem Earth 26:769–774
Kondratenko AM, Nersesov IL (1962) Some results of the study of change in the velocity of longitudinal waves and relation between the velocities of longitudinal and transverse waves in a focal zone. Trudy Insr Fiziol Zemli Acad Nauk USSR 25:130–150
Kostoglodov V, Singh SK, Santiago JA et al (2003) A large silent earthquake in the Guerrero seismic gap. Mexico. Geophys Res Lett 30:1807. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017219
Linde AT, Sacks IS (2002) Slow earthquakes and great earthquakes along the Nankai trough. Earth Planet. Sci Lett 203:265–275
Linde AT, Gladwin MT, Johnston MSJ, Gwyther RL, Bilham RG (1996) A slow earthquake sequence on the San Andreas fault. Nature 383:65–67
Lockner DA, Beeler NM (2002) Rock failure and earthquakes. In: Lee WHK et al (eds) International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology. Academic, San Diego, pp 505–537
Ma Z, Fu Z, Zhang Y et al (1990) Earthquake prediction: nine major earthquakes in China (1966–1976). Seismological Press, Beijing, p 332
Maeda K, Yoshida A (1990) A probabilistic estimation of the appearance times of multiple precursory phenomena. J Phys Earth 38:431–444
Martinelli G, Dadomo A (2018) Geochemical and fluid-related precursors of earthquakes: previous and ongoing research trends. In: Pre-earthquake processes: a multidisciplinary approach to earthquake prediction studies. Geophys Monogr Ser 234:219–228
McEvilly TV, Johnson LR (1974) Stability of P and S velocities from central California quarry blasts. Bull Seism Soc Am 64:343–353
Mogi K, Mochizuki H, Kurokawa Y (1989) Temperature changes in an artesian spring at Usami in the Izu Peninsula (Japan) and their relation to earthquakes. Tectonophysics 159:95–108
Nakata N, Snieder R (2011) Near-surface weakening in Japan after the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 38(17):L17302. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048800
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2017) Volcanic eruptions and their repose, unrest, precursors, and timing. National Academies Press, Washington DC
Nimiya H, Ikeda T, Tsuji T (2017) Spatial and temporal seismic velocity changes on Kyushu Island during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake. Sci Adv 3(11):e1700813
Niu F, Silver PG, Daley TM et al (2008) Preseismic velocity changes observed from active source monitoring at the Parkfield SAFOD drill site. Nature 454(7201):204–208
O’Connell RJ, Budiansky B (1974) Seismic velocities in dry and saturated cracked solids. J Geophys Res 79:5412–5426
Oh YH, Kim G (2015) A radon-thoron isotope pair as a reliable earthquake precursor. Sci Rep 5:13084
Onda S, Sano Y, Takahata N et al (2018) Groundwater oxygen isotope anomaly before the M6. 6 Tottori earthquake in Southwest Japan. Sci Rep 8(1):1–7
Ozawa S, Murakami M, Kaidzu M et al (2002) Detection and monitoring of ongoing aseismic slip in the Tokai region, central Japan. Sci 298:1009–1012
Papachristodoulou C, Stamoulis K, Ioannides K (2020) Temporal variation of soil gas radon associated with seismic activity: a case study in NW Greece. Pure Appl Geophys 177(2):821–836
Pei S, Niu F, Ben-Zion Y et al (2019) Seismic velocity reduction and accelerated recovery due to earthquakes on the Longmenshan fault. Nature Geosci 12(5):387–392
Poitrasson F, Dundaas SH, Toutain J-P, Munoz M, Rigo A (1999) Earth-related elemental and isotopic lead anomaly in a springwater. Earth Planet Sci Lett 169:269–276
Reddy DV, Kumar D, Rao NP (2017) Long-term hydrochemical earthquake precursor studies at the Koyna-Warna reservoir site in western India. J Geol Soc India 90(6):720–727
Richon P, Sabroux JC, Halbwachs M et al. (2003) Radon anomaly in the soil of Taal volcano, the Philippines: a likely precursor of the M 7.1 Mindoro earthquake (1994). Geophys Res Lett 30(9):1481. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL016902
Robinson R, Wesson RL, Ellsworth WL (1974) Variation of P-wave velocity before the Bear Valley, California earthquake of 24 February, 1972. Science 184:12811283
Roeloffs EA (1988) Hydrologic precursors to earthquakes: a review. PAGEOPH 126:177–209
Roeloffs EA (2006) Evidence for aseismic deformation-rate changes prior to earthquakes. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 34:591–627
Roeloffs E, Quilty E (1997) Water level and strain changes preceding and following the August 4, 1985 Kettleman Hills, California, earthquake. PAGEOPH 149:21–60
Rouet-Leduc B, Hulbert C, Lubbers N et al (2017) Machine learning predicts laboratory earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett 44(18):9276–9282
Sato H (1982) On the changes in the sea level at Tosashimuzu before the Nankaido earthquake of 1946. J Seismo Soc Japan 35:623–626
Scholtz C, Sykes LR, Aggarwal YP (1973) Earthquake prediction: a physical basis. Science 181:803–810
Scuderi MM, Marone C, Tinti E, Di Stefano G, Collettini C (2016) Precursory changes in seismic velocity for the spectrum of earthquake failure modes. Nat Geosci 9(9):695–700
Segall P, Desmarais EK, Shelly D et al (2006) Earthquakes triggered by silent slip events on Kilauea volcano. Hawaii. Nature 442:71–74
Semenov AN (1969) Variations in the travel-time of transverse and longitudinal waves before violent earthquakes. Izv Acad Sci USSR Phys Solid Earth 4 (English Trans.):245–248
Skelton A, Andrén M, Kristmannsdóttir H et al (2014) Changes in groundwater chemistry before two consecutive earthquakes in Iceland. Nat Geosci 7(10):752–756
Skelton A, Liljedahl-Claesson L, Wästeby N et al (2019) Hydrochemical changes before and after earthquakes based on long-term measurements of multiple parameters at two sites in Northern Iceland—a review. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 124(3):2702–2720
Silver PG, Vallette-Silver NJ (1992) Detection of hydrothermal precursors to large northern California earthquakes. Science 257:1363–1368
Song SR, Wu WY, Chen YL et al (2006) Hydrogeochemical anomalies in the springs of the Chiayi Area in west-central Taiwan as possible precursors to earthquakes. PAGEOPH 163:675–691
Sugisaki R (1978) Changing He/Ar and N2/Ar ratios of fault air may be earthquake precursors. Nature 275:209–211
Sugisaki R (1981) Deep-seated gas emission induced by the earth tide: a basic observation for geochemical earthquake prediction. Science 212:1264–1266
Sugisaki R, Sugiura T (1985) Geochemical indicator of tectonic stress resulting in an earthquake, central Japan, 1984. Science 229:1261–1262
Taira TA, Nayak A, Brenguier F, Manga M (2018) Monitoring reservoir response to earthquakes and fluid extraction, Salton Sea geothermal field. California. Science Advances 4(1):e1701536
Thomas D (1988) Geochemical Precursors to Seismic Activity. PAGEOPH 126:241–266
Toutain JP, Munoz M, Poitrasson F, Lienard AC (1997) Springwater chloride ion anomaly prior to a ML=5.2 Pyrenean earthquake. Earth Planet Sci Lett 149:113–119
Toutain JP, Baubron J (1999) Gas geochemistry and seismotectonics: a review. Tectonophysics 304:1–27
Trique N, Rochon P, Perrier F, Avouac JP, Sabroux JC (1999) Radon emanation and electric potential variations associated with transient deformation near reservoir lakes. Nature 399:137–141
Tsunogai U, Wakita H (1995) Precursory chemical changes in groundwater: Kobe earthquake, Japan. Science 269:61–63
Virk HS, Singh B (1993) Radon anomalies in soil-gas and groundwater as earthquake precursor phenomena. Tectonophysics 227:215–224
Wakita H (1996) Geochemical challenge to earthquake prediction. Proc Nat Acad Sci 93:3781–3786
Wakita H, Nakamura Y, Sano Y (1988) Short-Term and Intermediate-Term Geochemical Precursors. PAGEOPH 126:78–89
Wang HF (2000) Theory of linear poroelasticity. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 287pp
Wang C-Y (1974) Earthquake prediction and oriented microcracks in rocks. Nature 251:405–408
Wang K, Chen Q-F, Sun S, Wong A (2006) Predicting the 1975 Haicheng earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am 96:757–795
Whitcomb JH, Garmany JUD, Anderson DL (1973) Earthquake prediction: variation of seismic velocities before the San Fernando earthquake. Science 180:632–635
Woith H (2015) Radon earthquake precursor: a short review. Eur Phys J Spec Top 224(4):611–627
Wyss M, Booth DC (1997) The IASPEI procedure for the evaluation of earthquake precursors. Geophys J Int 131:423–424
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wang, CY., Manga, M. (2021). Hydrologic Precursors. In: Water and Earthquakes. Lecture Notes in Earth System Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64308-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64308-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64307-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64308-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)