Abstract
Financial reporting obligations for financial institutions, including insurance companies, have increased in recent years and insurers needs to stay up-to-date on the latest revisions of International Financial Reporting Standards and data reporting requirements and to comply with it. Many of these reporting obligations on listed and large non-listed insurers will benefit the insurance industry in the long term but it is challenging and costly task for insurance companies. The complexity of organizing high-quality data, transparent and structured reporting processes for different purposes (e.g., financial and regulatory reporting, CSR reporting, and many other types of reporting at local level) with internal and external stakeholders within a specified time frame, have become a strategic initiative, value-based investment, and opportunity for growth of insurance companies. To meet the various reporting requirements while overcoming reporting challenges, insurance companies need to ensure effective data governance and oversight in their reporting processes, which require considerable staff resources, and expertise in a wide variety of area, including appropriate IT architecture setup. In this chapter, we will analyze financial reporting obligations for insurance companies and evolution of the international accounting standards for the insurance industry. Moreover, we will discuss some practical issues facing insurers to comply with different regulatory, financial, and business reporting requirements to fulfill their reporting obligations.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Financial reporting
- International accounting standards
- IFRS 17 insurance contracts
- IASB
- Compliance
- Data quality
1 Introduction
The global financial crisis of 2007–2008 and subsequent world recession affected large numbers of financial institutions by slowing down their business activities and decreasing their earnings. Although banks were at the center of the financial crisis, for many individual insurers, direct exposure of the crisis has revealed inefficient and ineffective business processes, which were misaligned with a company’s activities and strategic direction (e.g., risk management, rationality in making financial decisions, investment, pricing, reserving or business grow) and inadequate minimum level of capital.Footnote 1
The crisis in financial markets was also indicative of market and government failures, unsatisfactory supervisory practice of the financial sector as a whole at both national and international level. In addition, the crisis has exposed shortcomings in financial regulation that left considerable discretion to the Member States by the primary directives that governed the area.Footnote 2 The economic downturn revealed that the solvency regime for the insurance sector is not sufficiently risk sensitive, i.e., it does not contain an incentive to improve risk management and it is necessary to establish more effective financial reporting framework.
Numerous changes in the regulatory frameworks, policy measures, standards tools and practice have been brought forward for both the insurance and banking sectors to build a more resilient financial system.Footnote 3 For insurance sector, this includes Directive 2009/138/EC (Solvency II)Footnote 4 which is analogous to Basel II’s capital adequacy requirements for banks, Insurance distribution DirectiveFootnote 5 and International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 17 Insurance Contracts.
The global financial crisis helped with re-assessing the value of corporate reporting and modernizing and optimizing reporting processes. Corporate reporting has become very sophisticated in the last years and in most insurance undertakings is carried out in a very professional manner.Footnote 6
Despite substantial evidence of capital-market benefits from corporate disclosures, the multiplicity of different reporting and disclosure requirements poses great functional and technical challenge for an insurance companies who needs to adapt their businesses to new regulations and to maintain ongoing compliance.Footnote 7 Most of the directives and regulations dealing with financial services are supplemented by various regulatory technical standards, implementing standards and guidance from EU and national regulators and insurance companies are expected to be compliant with all the applicable laws and regulations.
Producing and submitting structured financial and regulatory reports and other type of reports by collecting and combining data from multiple sources, for internal or external stakeholders, is a challenging and time-consuming task. For many financial institutions, including insurance companies, reporting obligations and disclosure is a mandatory obligation and exists only as a subsidiary function within different departments. Many insurance companies struggled how to organize skilled professional team responsible for regulatory compliance with a line of sight over reporting strategy, execution and an understanding of the full regulatory environment.
Additional problem represent how to deliver accurate and timely reports to regulators and the market and to ensure data security, data privacy, and data compliance. Some reporting requirements imposed by different supervisors are additionally costly, inconsistent, and duplicative, and the similar information needs to be delivered to different regulators in different ways and through different technology platforms.Footnote 8
There are significant unrecognized costs associated with errors, duplication of data and inefficient or incorrectly reporting processes that accrues for a variety of reasons (for example, data compiled for a specific purpose was reused for another report, with different underlying requirements and constraints). Some information demands are often excessive or unnecessary (sometimes, data are collected and not used) which leads to inefficiency. There are many open questions about relevance of the information contained in different mandatory reports and usefulness of reporting information for users.Footnote 9
This chapter aims to analyze the evolution of the international financial reporting standards and accounting requirements for insurance contracts. The development of an international standard for the accounting of insurance contracts, which reflects the complexity of the underlying insurance and reinsurance business, was a long and challenging process. Significant diversity in insurance contracts accounting practices has raised several issues regarding a successful implementation of new international standard for insurance contracts by insurers and its contribution to financial stability.
2 The Evolution of the International Financial Reporting Standards
The globalization of financial market and rapid growth of the trade in goods and services that goes beyond national borders, have triggered the need for a free movement of capital, goods, services and access to information included in the financial statements of companies that operate in several countries.Footnote 10 However, there were legal and accounting standard difficulties to achieve corporate disclosure, due to interest group resistance and the variety in national laws of the Member States.Footnote 11
Companies engaged in foreign trade (multinational, international, transnational and global companies) needed to comply with the different accounting frameworks and standards applicable in countries in which they operate. Information from financial statements of these companies created confusion and had limited value to users in other countries if they were not familiar with the accounting standards underlying these statements.
Many national interest groups in various countries realized that the growth in global trade is possible to achieve with international accounting harmonization system and uniform EU company law, which involves harmonization of company financial reporting.Footnote 12 A number of international organizations engaged in process of development of accounting standard such as: United Nations, the OECD, the European Economic Community (EEC), Accounting Standards Committee (independent professional accounting body—IASC)Footnote 13 and the International Federation of Accountants. The aim was to develop understandable and enforceable accounting standard, which will serve equity investors, lenders, creditors, and others in globalized capital markets.
However, the harmonization of financial statements by developing standards that could serve as a model on which national standard setters could base their own standards was a long-term process. The first steps towards harmonizing accounting standards were to align accounting standards in Europe.Footnote 14
The harmonization of accounting standard started with the adoption of the Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 on the annual accounts of certain types of companies and Seventh Council Directive 83/349/EEC of 13 June 1983.Footnote 15 Those two directives had a significant impact on company reporting in the Member States and they have remained largely unchanged until 2013.
The Fourth Council Directive’s first draft was published in 1971, amended drafts were issued in 1974 and adopted in 1978.Footnote 16 Member States were supposed to implement the Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC until 1980 but they have failed to do so. The Directive was transposed with considerable delay in some countries. For example, the Fourth Council Directive was transposed into German law in 1985,Footnote 17 Spain and Portugal in 1989, Austria in 1990,Footnote 18 Italy in 1991 and Sweden in 1995, etc.
To ensure agreement between Member States on a numerous issue, existing due to the different legal accounting rules and policy approaches, the Directive allowed Members States with a lot of flexibility on how to individually implement it. Moreover, certain flexibility were left to companies to prepare their financial statements to meet the needs of users. Thus, the Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC served more as recommendation, which provides guidance on how the provisions of the Directive should be used than an agreed standard.
Despite the fact that Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC was first stage of the harmonization process of accounting standards and it improved the comparability of annual financial statements of companies throughout Europe, there were some practical problems of its implementation.Footnote 19
There are a number of very significant accounting issues on which the Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC is silent. For example, the Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC does not include provisions about translation of foreign currency transactions, accounting for the effects of changing prices on financial statements or problem of deferred-tax accounting.Footnote 20
A few years later, The Council took additional steps towards a harmonized European accounting system with the adoption of two Directives dealing specifically with annual accounts and consolidated accounts specific to banksFootnote 21 and insurance undertakings.Footnote 22
The International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) has undertaken even bigger task to produce accounting standards that would be implemented worldwide.Footnote 23 During the period between 1973–1987, the IASC generated most of the International Accounting Standards (IAS).Footnote 24
The IAS (which were all prefixed with “IAS”—e.g., IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Period, IAS 14 Segment Reporting, IAS 21The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates, IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting) represent an attempt to find “middle ground” between national accounting regulations, where the financial reporting standards are already highly developed, as opposed to an effort on international standardization in financial reporting. The level of harmony of financial reporting within and between countries depends on the degree of compliance with the IAS. IAS standards were increasingly used as a model by national accounting standards setters but they were not implemented by a significant number of large companies.Footnote 25
Some commentators questioned the scope and authority of IAS Standards.Footnote 26 IASC was established in 1973 as a part-time, voluntary organization, run by the professional accounting bodies from nine countries. The IASC was not a government body and the IAS Standards could not be imposed as a set of accounting rules that could be part of a standard international listing agreement and applied by all national regulators.Footnote 27
The Restructuring structure of the IASC started in 2001. IASC handed over its functions to the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The newly formed IASB took over the standards of the IASC and decided to name new accounting standards issued by the IASB as International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
In June 2002, the European Union has endorsed the International Accounting Standards (IAS/IFRS) for all EU companies (including many of the largest insurance companies in Europe) that are listed on European exchanges through the adoption of the Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002.Footnote 28 From 2005 all companies were required to prepare and publish their consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS.Footnote 29 The Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 authorizes EU Member States to extend the IFRS requirement to the consolidated financial statements of non-listed companies.Footnote 30
Since 2011, the European Commission has taken steps with the goal of imposing obligations on listed and large non-listed entities to disclose certain non-financial information about sustainable development and environmental policy in the annual reports.Footnote 31
The result was a new law on accounting, the Directive 2013/34/EU of 26 June 2013Footnote 32 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, which also applies on credit institutions and insurance companies.Footnote 33 Directive 2013/34/EU combines and updates the requirements of the 4th and 7th Council Directives and refers both to the individual financial statements and consolidated financial statements.Footnote 34
The main focus of Directive 2013/34/EU is to harmonize accounting and simplify reporting and disclosure requirements which will lead to reducing administrative burdens and the lower costs of financial reporting for small- and medium-sized enterprises ((SMEs) and micro-enterprises. However, the reduction of the administrative burden for SMEs has not been fully achieved due to the different transposition of the Directive 2013/34/EU in some Member States, and the fact that there are no middle-sized entity categories in some countries.Footnote 35
Directive 2014/95/EU amended Directive 2013/34/EU and represents first step in the field of mandatory sustainability reporting. This directive requires large companies (exceeding 500 employees) to include annual non-financial statements on sustainability and diversity, either as a part of their management report or as a separate document from 2017 onwards.Footnote 36
3 Evolution of Accounting Rules and Financial Statements for Insurance Companies
The lack of quality and consistency in insurance reporting and accounting practices has resulted in weak usefulness of financial statement information for investors, creditors and analysts to evaluate a company’s financial position and performance. Compared with the banking sector, the insurance sector in the EU was not known for its transparency in financial reporting that reflects economic reality towards supervisory authorities and stakeholders. Moreover, insurance sector has not followed financial reforms that was developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in banking (Basel reforms).Footnote 37
An internationally accepted accounting standard for the measurement of insurance contracts did not exist until 2004.Footnote 38 The absence of international standards for insurance industry, both in accounting and in solvency, has resulted to the fragmentation of the existing insurance accounting practices, which are often inconsistent with accounting practices of other industries. Significant diversity in insurance contracts accounting practices was also the result of different accounting standards and different types of insurance products in each jurisdiction.Footnote 39
The IASB (formerly IASC) has been working on a new international standard for insurance contracts based on fair value for many years to reduce the differences among the accounting principles used in insurance industry and improve comparability and understanding of the income statement of companies issuing insurance contract across entities, jurisdictions, and capital markets.Footnote 40
The development of an international standard for the accounting of insurance contracts has raised several conceptual and practical issues regarding its application. Some issues are general and affect all financial institutions and some specific to the insurance sector.
Insurance is a unique financial service and preparation of financial statements of insurance business requires the application of actuarial science to determine results, and then to integrate those results with accounting rules.Footnote 41 The preparation and production of high quality financial statements of insurance business can be very complicated; whether the insurance business is long-term such as life insurance or health and long-term care insurance; or short insurance business duration with a long term such as workers’ compensation insurance.Footnote 42
Insurance is interdisciplinary topic and interacts with various fields of law, accounting, marketing, economics and finance.Footnote 43 It can be defined from legal aspect (contract of law,) risk management and risk transfer tool, social or commercial device providing financial compensation and for accounting , insurance is an intangible product of insurance business.Footnote 44 Definition of insurance contracts are relevant regarding insurance accounting standards for insurance contracts and determines whether a contract is within the scope of IFRS or another standard.
Another debate concerns the question of fair value accounting for insurance contracts in financial reporting. Insurance contracts are not tradable financial instruments (unless considering their tradeable stock or debt in the secondary market) and market values cannot be objectively presumed. Insurance accounting measurement models involves using judgment, estimation and clear and precise rules for fair value for insurance.Footnote 45
The IASC/IASB and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) have been dealing with the challenges in auditing fair value measurements on assets and liabilities arising from insurance contracts for a number of years.Footnote 46 IASC/IASB and FASB have promulgated a number of conceptual frameworks for Financial Reporting and fair value measurement Standards requiring fair value accounting for selected (largely financial) assets and liabilities.Footnote 47 There is still ongoing discussions among professionals with respect to the application of fair value accounting of Insurance Contracts but it is difficult to reach complete consensus about this topic.
There are many other challenges involved in adopting and implementing international standards for insurance contracts which involves, how to ensure effective accounting rules, how to increase reporting transparency and give users a better understanding of the sources and trends of earnings or excessive implementation costs. Another important challenge is how to ensure that the long-term nature of insurers’ business is captured in annual reporting.
The development of the new international accounting standards for insurance contracts is part to a European Union’s initiative to converge their financial reporting standard to International Financial Reporting Standards.Footnote 48 There was no accounting standard for insurance contracts before the establishment of the European Union (EU) in 1992, and IFRS for insurance contracts relied on local GAAP.Footnote 49
In 1997, the IASB initiated a two-phase project called “Insurance Contracts” and set up a steering committee to carry out the initial work on new accounting requirements for insurance contracts.Footnote 50 This project was split in two-phase, mainly because of complexity to develop a full standard by the time of EU’s 2005 year-end deadline for the mandatory adoption of IFRS. About the same time, the EU started work on Solvency II, a framework directive aimed at enhancing policyholder protection; improve (international) competitiveness of EU insurers and streamlining and strengthening solvency requirements across the EU in an effort to create a single market for insurance.Footnote 51
In December 1999, the IASC Steering committee published an Issues Paper on Insurance and in June 2001 developed first Draft Statement of Principles—Insurance contract (DSOP) which was based on its work and the 138 comment letters to the issue paper.Footnote 52 The DSOP was never approved because of many issues raised by actuaries, insurance companies but it created a foundation for further work. In October 2001, the IASC Steering committee published last DSOP and in July 2003, the IASB Published Exposure Draft ED 5—Insurance Contracts.Footnote 53
The IASB’s insurance accounting project, phase 1, was completed in March 2004 when IFRS 4 was released an interim standard. IFRS 4 provides only limited improvements to accounting practices for insurance contracts until comprehensive accounting standard (IFRS 17) could be finalized. IFRS 4 permits an entity to continue of existing accounting practices (paragraph 25) and requires to disclose information that identifies and explains the amount, timing and cash flow assumptions from insurance contract (paragraph 15). Thus, many IFRS jurisdictions where IFRS is used for general purpose financial reporting do not also use IFRS 4 for regulatory purposes because of the absence of a consistent accounting framework for all insurance contracts in IFRS 4. They instead specify supervisory methods for the determination of insurance contract liabilities. For example, in the European context, solvency assessment is not based on IFRS but on balance sheets using the Solvency II framework.Footnote 54
On 18 May 2017, IASB published IFRS 17 “Insurance Contracts” which replaces interim standard, IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts. The IFRS 17 Standard will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. Subsequently, after a period of consultation, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 4Footnote 55 which allows an insurance entity to use the overlay approachFootnote 56 and temporary exemption from applying IFRS 9 Financial Instruments to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. This means that insurers will still be able to apply IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 at the same time, thus reducing implementation costs and possibly accounting mismatches.
4 Financial Stability and the Insurance Sector
Financial reporting transformation and development of an international standard for the accounting of insurance contracts started much later than in banking sector.Footnote 57 There were several reasons for a late start: global insurance market is characterized by differences between developed and developing countries; thus, insurance business model is less globalized than other areas in finance (e.g., capital markets or investments).Footnote 58 There were also limited research of the insurer’s business model and its interactions with financial and other financial intermediaries.Footnote 59
As mentioned, the financial crisis of 2008 and the subsequent recession had negative effects on economy, including decreased of business activities of global and regional financial and insurance companies. Some insurers experienced substantial capital deterioration, some of them required government support (e.g., the case of American International Group—AIG) or some insurers needed to seek changes to accounting rules to provide capital relief.Footnote 60
For insurers, financial crisis and economic recession simultaneously influenced the decrease in the value of assets and an increase in the value of liabilities because it had strong negative impact on all insurers’ business activities (underwriting, investments and risk transfer).Footnote 61 The financial crisis has exposed multiple failures in the financial system and their implications for financial system stability. A number of tighter regulations of the financial sector have been issued to prevent future financial crise, including set of changes to accounting practice (US GAAP and IFRS).Footnote 62
One of the key issues in the post-crisis environment was a restoring public confidence through the structural changes in the insurance industry. Some of legislator’s objective were: to strengthen the oversight of insurance companies that are considered important for systemic financial stability in the global financial system; and to develop a credible and coherent accounting standards and prudential capital standard for internationally active insurance groups (IAIGs).
Traditionally, banks have been connected with concept financial stability (i.e., the absence of systemic risk) because of their maturity transformation and their leading role in the transmission of monetary policy, the payment system and the reallocation of savings to investments.Footnote 63 The contribution to systemic risk by insurers has been regarded less significant than in banks.
Insurance industry is going through a period of transformation driven by a number of factors, such as changes in the insurance sector environment, new disruptive technologies, regulatory activities. Insurers are expanding their activities beyond their core business which leads to a closer integration between insurance and banking undertakings.Footnote 64 This is especially the case in the OTC derivatives markets, bancassurance or unit-linked or index-linked products.Footnote 65 For this reason, the role of insurance companies in financial market and relevance of the insurance sector for the overall stability of the financial sector has gained importance over the years.Footnote 66
Discussions about remedial measures to address financial stability risks and vulnerabilities in the insurance sector started after the financial crisis and failure of AIG’s CDS (credit default swaps) business in 2008, decline in equity markets that began in 2000 and subsequent low interest rate environment.Footnote 67 Moreover, strong interconnections between the insurance industry and the rest of the financial system, non-traditional or non-insurance activities of insurance companies (including their activities in credit risk transfers) has become increasingly relevant for maintaining a stable financial system. It is necessery to understand interaction between insurance companies with financial markets, banks and other financial intermediaries and the fluctuations in the business cycle to determine potential risk transfer from one sector to another.
Banks and insurance companies are both financial institutions but very different in terms of business models, funding structure, financial products, different nature of underlying risks which is the result of many factors such as demographics, the structure of liabilities, the scale of operations, regulation, accounting practices and distribution channels.Footnote 68 There have been attemps to push towards convergence between banking and insurance setor, including integration insurance regulation with the regulation of banking and investment business at EU level.Footnote 69 However, this regulatory approach is not sufficiently taking account dfferences between banks and insurers.
Bearing in mind contrasting business models and balance sheet structures of banks and insurers, different roles of capital, leverage, and risk absorption, it is clear that the banking model of capital cannot be applied to insurance. The case is the same with the accounting regime.
The primary goal of IFRS 17 insurance contract is transparency, accountability and efficiency to financial markets which at same time promotes the long-term financial stability of the global economy. Insurers can be consider systematicly important because of the economic role of the insurance sector.Footnote 70
It is hard to assess the extent to which insurers can be originators or transmitters of systemic risk in the financial system.Footnote 71 However, IFRS 17 will contribute to financial stability by providing more granular contractual data about insurers’s current and future profitability.
5 Conclusion
Financial institutions and insurance companies are facing with a regulatory environment that changes rapidly, complex and expensive reporting requirements and numerous regulatory disclosures obligations. Many of these reporting requirements are not only limited to the financial performance of a company, but also include a relevant non-financial information statement on company’s impact on social and environmental matters. International Financial Reporting Standards and high quality of financial statement information have two main objectives. First, to bring high transparency, accountability and efficiency to financial markets through the international standards and second, transparency in financial reporting and accountability derived from accounting standard represent a significant factor for achieving financial stability and underpin the trust that investors creditors and other interest groups place. IFRS 17 insurance contract represents first harmonized accounting model for insurance contracts. This new accounting requirements for insurance contracts was created to provide more transparent information about the effect and revenue of insurance contracts on financial statements for stakeholders, investors, analysts, and consumers. IFRS 17 insurance contract is complex regulation, which will require insurers to take a different approach to measuring and reporting insurance and reinsurance assets and liabilities for insurance contracts. Complying with this regulation will raise many practical implementation issues, including significant operational costs for most companies. Another challenging task will be the organization of IFRS 17 compliance reporting structures, assigning roles and reporting responsibilities between different departments in a company. Smaller insurers, whose resources are limited, will need to consider outsourcing compliance processes to fulfill their reporting obligations.
Notes
- 1.
Schich (2010a), p. 15.
- 2.
- 3.
Marano (2017), pp. 5–29.
- 4.
Directive 2009/138/EC of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance, Official Journal of the European Union, L 335/1.
- 5.
Directive (EU) 2016/97 of 20 January 2016 on insurance distribution, Official Journal of the European Union.
- 6.
Reporting to supervisory authorities help regulators in terms of monitoring the regulatory capital, safety, and soundness of the legal entity. Public disclosure by insurance companies: leads to more competition and offers a unique opportunity for self-assessment of the situation on the ground, including through data collection and analysis for legislative and policy review. Corporate reporting is very flexible to adapt to changing environment and new risks (e.g., technological, demographic, climate and political changes, cyber risks).
- 7.
For a selective literature review about reporting obligation and disclosure by insurance companies, see representative bibliography as follows: Bloomer (2005), pp. 101-107; Pucci (2012), pp. 115–138; De Mey (2009), pp. 228–241; Höring and Gründl (2011), pp. 380–413, Jovković (2018), pp. 110–126; Chiaramonte, et al. (2020), p. 5530.
- 8.
Nagari et al. (2017).
- 9.
Cascino et al. (2021).
- 10.
Held et al. (2000), pp. 14–28.
- 11.
- 12.
There were groups who were mainly interested in regulations that imposes stricter reporting, auditing, and accounting requirements for international companies with the goal to exercise greater control over their business activities.
- 13.
The IASC was replaced by the International Accounting Standards Board in 2001.
- 14.
Van Hulle (2002), pp. 357–365.
- 15.
The Fourth Company Law Directive (78/660/EEC) establishes the content of financial information that should be made available to the public by limited liability companies and the content of annual accounts (balance sheet, profit and loss account and the notes to the accounts), the publication and auditing requirements of the annual accounts depending on the size of the company; Diggle and Nobes (1994), pp. 319–333.
- 16.
Botez and Pravat (2009), pp. 791–795.
- 17.
German legislature transposed The Fourth Directive by the Accounting Directives Law (Bilanzrichtliniengesetz, BGBl (1985 I), p. 2355) and applied its rules to the capital companies and all traders, including subsidiaries of companies registered in other Member States.
- 18.
Alexander and Eberhartinger (2009), pp. 571–594.
- 19.
Walton (2015), pp. 135–151.
- 20.
The IASC was formed in 1973 through an agreement made by the leading accounting bodies of ten countries: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Mexico, The Netherlands, the U.K., Ireland, and the U.S. The IASC decided to restructure in April 2001 and became the International Accounting Standards Board ((IASB) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) replaced the IAS; Camfferman and Zeff (2007), p. 21; Zeff (2011), pp. 807–837.
- 21.
Council Directive 86/635 of 8 December 1986 Annual Accounts and Consolidated Accounts of Banks and Other Financial Institutions, 1986 O.J. (L 372) 1, 1.
- 22.
Council Directive 91/674 of 19 December 1991 Annual Accounts and Consolidated Accounts of Insurance Undertakings, 1991 O.J. (L 374) 7, 7.
- 23.
- 24.
Knežević et al. (2013), p. 64.
- 25.
Walton (2003), pp. 59–65.
- 26.
- 27.
Flower and Ebbers (2002), p. 239.
- 28.
Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards, Official Journal L 243, 11/09/2002 p. 0001-0004.
- 29.
Some types of listed company did not need to comply with IFRS until 01.01. 2007. Individual Member States had option to decide about this delayed implementation. Temporary exceptions are made for companies with a listing outside the EU who were using internationally accepted standards.
- 30.
Article 5 of the Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002.
- 31.
European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Single Market Act—Twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence—“Working together to create new growth”, Brussels, 13 April 2011, COM(2011) 206 final; European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility, adopted on 25 October 2011.
- 32.
Directive 2013/34/EU of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC, Official Journal of the European Union, L 182/19.
- 33.
- 34.
Directive 2013/34/EU contains definition of Public Interest Entities (PIEs) and includes all insurance undertakings in the EU, regardless of whether they are listed or not and regardless of whether they are life, non-life, insurance or reinsurance undertakings; Hýblová and Kolčavová (2017), pp. 1349–1357; Strampelli (2018), pp. 541–579.
- 35.
Hýblová (2019), pp. 604–621.
- 36.
Directive 2014/95/EU of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups, Official Journal of the European Union L 330/1.
- 37.
- 38.
Insurance contracts have been excluded from the scope of the accounting standard for financial instruments in the United States, FAS 133, as it was a common opinion that financial market is not ready to determine fair values for insurance contracts; Dickinson (2003a), p. 151; Nguyen and Molinari (2013), p. 384.
- 39.
Foroughi et al. (2012), p. 570.
- 40.
Dickinson (2003a), pp. 151–175.
- 41.
Insurance Europe (2019), p. 3.
- 42.
- 43.
- 44.
Stanić and Glavaš (2013), p. 654.
- 45.
- 46.
Alexander et al. (2012), p. 84.
- 47.
The Financial Instruments Joint Working Group of standard setters (JWG) proposed in its “Draft Standard and Basis for Conclusions Financial Instruments and Similar Items” a hierarchy of methods for determining fair value of financial instruments. Since many insurance contracts are included within its definition of financial instruments, this hierarchy presumably would apply to insurance liabilities.
- 48.
- 49.
- 50.
Dickinson (2003b), pp. 151–176.
- 51.
Directive 2009/138/EC of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II), Official Journal of the European Union L 335/1; Marano (2017), pp. 5–29.
- 52.
Altenburger (2006), p. 323.
- 53.
Dickinson (2003a), pp. 151–175.
- 54.
Engeländer and Kölschbach (2006), p. 512.
- 55.
The amendments in Applying IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments” with IFRS 4 “Insurance Contracts” on 12 September 2016 and Extension of the Temporary Exemption from Applying IFRS 9 on 25 June 2020.
- 56.
The overlay approach mitigates some of the effects from the volatility caused by misalignment of the implementation of IFRS 9 and IFRS 4. It allows an insurance entity to exclude from profit or loss certain effects of IFRS 9 and regrouped these amounts to other comprehensive income (OCI) for certain financial assets.
- 57.
The case is the same with the Basel Committee on Banking Regulations and Supervisory Practices (BCBS) which was founded in 1974. The first set of principles for sharing supervisory responsibility for banks’ foreign branches, subsidiaries, and joint ventures between host and parent (or home) supervisory authorities (“Concordat”) was issued in 1975. The BCBS developed over several years. The Basel Accords (Basel I in 1988, Basel II in 2004, Basel III in 2010) and BCBS report on Basel III implementation in October 2012. Similarly, insurance regulators developed the First Council Directive 79/267/EEC of 5 March 1979, Directive 2002/83/EC (Solvency I) was adopted in 2002 and Solvency II in 2009; Basel Committee on Banking Supervision 2012; Loguinova (2019), p. 19; Zweifel (2014), pp. 135–157.
- 58.
Olasehinde-Williams and Balcilar (2020).
- 59.
Trichet (2005), pp. 65–71.
- 60.
In the aftermath of financial crisis, American Insurance Group (AIG) faced liquidity problems. AIG achieved positive financial results in the underwriting business. Due to AIG excessive exposures to subprime mortgages that resulted from credit default swaps business of its financial products division and its negative investment results, the company declared a loss of $13 billion in August 2008. The government had to bail out the AIG by providing credit line of $85 billion in return for 79.9% share in AIG, factually nationalizing the company, and later by providing additional $37.8 billion. The other example is the case of Swiss Re. Swiss Re reinsurer losses came from a unit that was involved in writing credit default swaps, providing credit protection and capital market trading outweighed the profits from (well performing) core business to be had at the consolidated level of the group; Baluch et al. (2011), pp. 126–163; Hunt (2011), p. 1667; Schich (2010b), p. 45.
- 61.
Society of Actuaries (2017), p. 5.
- 62.
Bender (2005), p. 13.
- 63.
- 64.
Pavić Kramarić et al. (2019), pp. 163–178.
- 65.
- 66.
Central bank of the Republic of Austria defines financial stability as a financial system being “capable of ensuring the efficient allocation of financial resources and fulfilling its key macroeconomic functions even if financial imbalances and shocks occur.” https://www.oenb.at/en/financial-market/financial-stability.html.
- 67.
McDonald and Paulson (2015), pp. 81–106.
- 68.
Beltratti and Corvino (2008), pp. 363-388.
- 69.
Noussia and Siri (2019), p. 28.
- 70.
Dickinson (1998), p. 519.
- 71.
Baranoff (2011), p. 21.
References
Albrecher H, Bauer D, Embrechts P, Filipović D, Koch-Medina P, Korn R, Loisel S, Pelsser A, Schiller F, Schmeiser H, Wagner J (2018) Asset-liability management for long-term insurance business. Eur Actuarial J 8:9–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-018-0167-5
Alexander D, Eberhartinger E (2009) The true and fair view in the European Union. Eur Account Rev 18(3):571–594 Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1331387
Alexander D, Bonaci C, Mustata R (2012) Fair value measurement in financial reporting. Proc Econ Financ 3:84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00124-4
Altenburger OA (2006) IFRS 4 insurance contracts — verbesserte Versicherungsrechnungslegung?. ZVersWiss 95:323–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353452
Araceli M, McGeachin A, Barth M, Barker R, Wagenhoffer A, Joos P (2019) Fair value accounting: the eternal debate – AinE EAA Symposium, May 2018. Account Eur 16(3):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2019.1664754
Baluch F, Mutenga S, Parsons C. (2011) Insurance, systemic risk and the financial crisis. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Iss Pract 36(1):126–163. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2010.40
Baranoff EG, Haefeli D, Liedtke PM (2011) Insurers as systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs)? Activities-based methodology, systemic risk, Basel III, Financial Stability and Regulation 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1772089 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1772089
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2012) Progress report on Basel III implementation. http://www.g20ys.org/upload/auto/829497400add53d124cefbe8b3f3820290340e02.pdf
Beltratti A, Corvino G (2008) Why are insurance companies different? The limits of convergence among financial institutions. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Iss Pract 33(3):363–388. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2008.13
Bender C (2005) Umsatzerfassung nach US-GAAP und IFRS Konzeption, Problembereiche, Lösungsansätze Gabler Edition Wissenschaft
Bloomer J (2005) Developments in international financial reporting standards and other financial reporting issues. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Iss Pract 30(1):101–107. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510002
Botez D, Pravat I (2009) Study concerning the differences between the Fourth directive and accounting standards from Romania. Ann Faculty Econ 3(1):791–795
Buxbaum RM, Hirsch A, Klaus J, Hopt KJ, Hertig G (1991) European business law: legal and economic analyses on integration and harmonization. De Gruyter
Camfferman K, Zeff AS (2007) Financial Reporting and global capital markets: a history of the international accounting standards committee. Oxford University Press, pp 1973–2000
Cascino S, Clatworthy M, Osma GB, Gassen J, Shahed I (2021) The usefulness of financial accounting information: evidence from the field. Account Rev 96(1):117–146. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-1030
Center for Excellence in Accounting & Security Analysis (2008) Principles for the application of fair value accounting. https://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/mygsb/faculty/research/pubfiles/3029/FairValue.pdf
Chiaramonte L (2018) The implications of Basel III liquidity regulatory reform. In: Bank liquidity and the global financial crisis. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94400-5_7
Chiaramonte L, Dreassi A, Paltrinieri A, Pisera S (2020) Sustainability practices and stability in the insurance industry. Sustainability 12(14):5530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145530
Craig P (2015) The financial crisis, the European Union institutional order, and constitutional responsibility, maastricht treaty, democracy deficit, lisbon treaty. Indiana J Glob Legal Stud 22(2):243–267. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls/vol22/iss2/2
Danjou P, Walton P (2012) The legitimacy of the IASB. Account Eur 9(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2012.664396
De Mey J (2009) Reporting on the financial performance of life insurers. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Iss Pract 34(2):228–241. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2009.6
Dickinson G (1998) The economic role of the insurance sector in the risk transfer - capital market nexus. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Iss Pract 23(89):519–529. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.1998.45
Dickinson G (2003a) The search for an international accounting standard for insurance: report to the accountancy task force of the Geneva Association. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Iss Pract 28(2):151–176. www.jstor.org/stable/41952682. Accessed 27 Apr 2021
Dickinson G (2003b) The search for an international accounting standard for insurance: report to the accountancy task force of the Geneva association. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Iss Pract 28(2):151–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0440.00215
Diggle G, Nobes C (1994) European rule-making in accounting: the seventh directive as a case study. Account Bus Res 24(96):319–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1994.9729490
Engeländer S, Kölschbach JA (2006) Reliable fair value for insurance contracts. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues and Practice 31(3):512–527. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510093
Flower J, Ebbers G (2002) The IASB: its origins and structure. In: Global financial reporting. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10538-7_11
Foroughi K, Barnard RC, Bennett RW, Clay DK, Conway EL, Corfield SR, Coughlan AJ, Harrison JS, Hibbett GJ, Kendix IV, Lanari-Boisclair MC, Brien DO, Straker JSK (2012) Insurance accounting: a new era? Br Actuarial J 17(3):562–649. Accessed 27 April 2021. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23356789
Gatzert N, Wesker HA (2012) Comparative assessment of Basel II/III and Solvency II. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Iss Pract 37(3):539–570. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2012.3
Held D., McGrew A., Goldblatt D., Perraton J (2000) Global transformations: politics, economics and culture. In: Pierson C, Tormey S (eds) Politics at the edge. Political Studies Association Yearbook Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. pp 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333981689_2
Hollman KW et al (1991) The structure and disciplinary boundaries of insurance: a citational analysis of JRI Articles. J Risk Insur 58(4): 714–721. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/253082. Accessed 24 Apr 2021
Höring D, Gründl H (2011) Investigating risk disclosure practices in the European insurance industry. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 36(3):380–413. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2011.13
Hunt JP (2011) Credit ratings in insurance regulation: the missing piece of financial reform. Washington Lee Law Rev 68(4):1667–1697. https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol68/iss4/3
Hýblová E (2019) The current problems of harmonization of accounting for small and medium-sized enterprises. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 32(1):604–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1561317
Hýblová E, Kolčavová A (2017) The consequences of “Options” in the Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Financial Statements. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 65(4):1349–1357. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765041349
Insurance Europe (2019) Why insurance is unique And offers unique benefits for consumers. https://insuranceeurope.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/Why%20insurance%20is%20unique_0.pdf
Jovković BČ (2018) Karakteristike finansijskih izveštaja osiguravajućih kompanija i njihova revizija. Bus Econ 12(1):110–126. https://doi.org/10.5937/poseko13-16143
Knežević G, Stanišić N, Mizdraković V (2013) Analiza finansijskih izvještaja. Univerzitet, Singidunum
Kozarevic S, Kozarevic E, Porretta P, Santoboni F (2018) Implementation of Basel and solvency risk assessment standards in banks and insurance companies of South-Eastern Europe Countries. Risk Assessment:225–246. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70605
LaDou J (2011) The European influence on workers’ compensation reform in the United States. Environ Health 10:103. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-10-103
Loguinova K (2019) A critical legal study of the ideology behind Solvency II, Economic and financial law & policy – shifting insights & values. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26357-7
Marano P (2017) Sources and tools of the insurance regulation in the European Union. In: Marano P, Siri M (eds) Insurance regulation in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61216-4_2
Marius D (2014) The New EU Accounting Directive – A Comparison of Reporting Requirements (1 May 2014). Annals of “Constantin Brâncuşi” University of Târgu-Jiu, 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2775921
McDonald R, Paulson A (2015) AIG in Hindsight. J Econ Persp 29(2):81–106. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.2.81
Mohd A, Mohd A, Mohd A (2019) Barriers in adoption of IFRS in developed and developing economies: TIFS framework. Int J Recent Technol Eng 8(4):506–512. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D7105.118419
Nagari F, Muriithi A, Marshall R (2017) Data management in the new world of insurance fiancial and actuarial, Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/cn/Documents/financial-services/deloitte-cn-fs-data-management-in-new-world-of-insurance-finance-and-actuarial-en-171207.pdf
Nguyen T, Molinari P (2013) Accounting for “insurance contracts” according to IASB exposure draft—is the information useful? Geneva Pap Risk Insur 28(2):376–398. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2012.11
Nobes C (1998) Towards a general model of the reasons for international differences in financial reporting, Abacus 34(2):162–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.00028
Noussia K, Siri M (2019) The legal regime and the relevant standard, distribution of insurance-based investment products the EU regulation and the liabilities: the EU regulation and the liabilities. Springer, pp 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11668-2
O’Shea M (2013) Comparison of the Regulatory Approach in Insurance and Banking in the Context of Solvency II, European actuarial consultative group. https://actuary.eu/documents/SII%20vs%20Basel%20II_Dec_12_final.pdf
Olasehinde-Williams G, Balcilar M (2020) Examining the effect of globalization on insurance activities in large emerging market economies. Res Int Bus Financ 53(C):101228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101228
Ortiz E (2005) GAAP choice by European companies. Eur Bus Rev 17(1):36–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340510576258
Pacter P (2005) What exactly is convergence? Int J Account Audit Perform Eval 2(1–2):67–83. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2005.006893
Pakšiová R (2018) The comparison of requirements for a disclosure of non-financial information according to legal regulations in Slovakia and EU directives, Fourth international scientific conference ERAZ 2018 pp 736–745. https://doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2018.736
Pascal P (2020) Banks, Maturity Transformation, and Monetary Policy, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2020-07. https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2020-07
Pavić Kramarić T, Miletić, M, Kožul Blaževski R (2019) Financial stability of insurance companies in selected CEE countries. Bus Syst Res J 10(2):163–178. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2019-025
Pelger C, Spieß N (2017) On the IASB’s construction of legitimacy – the case of the agenda consultation project. Account Bus Res 47(1):64–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1198684
Pucci S (2012) Insurance financial statements, Bancassurance in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, pp 115–138
PWC (2017) IFRS adoption by country https://www.pwc.ru/ru/ifrs/ifrs-17-hub-int/pwc-ifrs-by-country-2016.pdf
Rambure D, Nacamuli A (2008) The role of payment systems in the economy. In: Payment systems. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227217_5
Reifner U, Clerc-Renaud S, Knobloch RA M, Flach L (2011) Financial Supervision in the EU A consumer perspective Institut für Finanzdienstleistungen e.V Hamburg https://www.beuc.eu/publications/2011-00396-01-e.pdf
Richardson AJ, Eberlein B (2011) Legitimating transnational standard-setting: the case of the international accounting standards board. J Bus Ethics 98(2):217–245. www.jstor.org/stable/41475812. Accessed 27 Apr 2021
Rockas I, Siafarika A (2019) The notion of insurance-based investment products, distribution of insurance-based investment products the EU regulation and the liabilities: the EU regulation and the liabilities, pp 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11668-2
Rohrbach W (2018) Značaj istorije osiguranja. Tokovi osiguranja 3:7–26. http://tokoviosiguranja.edu.rs/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/18-03_1.pdf
Samuels JM, Piper A (1985) International accounting: a survey croom helm series on international accounting and finance. St. Martin’s Press
Schich S (2010a) The role of insurance in the recent financial crisis. Insur Mark Comp Anal Actuarial Comput 1(1):45–53. https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/2819/IMC_2010_1_Schich.pdf
Schich S (2010b) Insurance companies and the financial crisis. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends. https://www.oecd.org/pensions/insurance/44260382.pdf
Society of Actuaries (2017) Reviewing Systemic Risk within the Insurance Industry. https://www.soa.org/globalassets/assets/files/research/projects/reviewing-systemic-risk.pdf
Stanić L, Glavaš J (2013) Uloga i značenje menadžmenta u osiguranju, Ekonomski vjesnik: Review of Contemporary Entrepreneurship, Business, and Economic Issues 16(2):637–653
Strampelli G (2018) The EU issuers’ accounting disclosure regime and investors’ information needs: the essential role of narrative reporting. Eur Bus Organ Law Rev 19:541–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-018-0112-8
Tomic K (2017) Bankoosiguranje na tržištu osiguranja zemalja Europske Unije, XVIII Conference Proportionality and Legal Certainty in Insurance Law, Palic ISBN 978-86-920975-0-8. 199-215.
Trichet JC (2005) Financial stability and the insurance sector. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Iss Pract 30(1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510021
Van Hulle VK (2002) International convergence of accounting standards: a comment on Jeffrey. Duke J Comp Int Law 12:357–196. Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/djcil/vol12/iss2/8
Walton P (2003) International Accounting Standards: The New Regime, International accounting and reporting issues 2001 review, United Nation Geneva https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/iteteb14_en.pdf
Walton P ( 2013) Fair value and accounting, handbook of key global financial markets, institutions, and infrastructure. In: Caprio G, Arner DW, Beck T, Calomiris CW, Neal L, Veron N (eds) Academic Press, pp 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397873-8.00251-6
Walton P (2015) IFRS in Europe – an observer’s perspective of the next 10 years. Account Eur 12(2):135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2015.1095306
Zeff S (2011) The evolution of the IASC into the IASB, and the challenges it faces. Account Rev 87(3):807–837. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10246
Zweifel P (2014) Solvency regulation of insurers: a regulatory failure? J Insur Iss 37(2):135–157. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/43151297. Accessed 28 Apr 2021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tomic, K. (2022). Financial Reporting in Insurance and International Financial Reporting Standards. In: Marano, P., Noussia, K. (eds) The Governance of Insurance Undertakings . AIDA Europe Research Series on Insurance Law and Regulation, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85817-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85817-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85816-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85817-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)