Abstract
This chapter outlines the portfolio of simulation campaigns that have been carried out to thoroughly study the effects of platooning in the traffic system. The approach outlined in Chap. 7 is utilised to quantify typical platoon trajectories and manoeuvres in highway settings as well as in urban intersection scenarios. The addressed studies do not yield a single result, but instead depend on many parameters (such as platoon spacing/gap policy, surrounding traffic density and speed and many more) and are investigated in terms of the results’ sensitivities on these parameters. This approach allows one to draw meaningful conclusions despite the inherent uncertainty and spread of the influencing parameters. By using representative conditions, the resulting KPI distributions are evaluated and interpreted. Considering real traffic parameters, such as density, truck share, distances, speed and their empirical distributions and restrictions on the assumed “degree of connectivity” of trucks, maximum platoon length, an estimation of the real achievable traffic efficiency and the potential for improvement relative to the current status can be calculated.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Platooning
- Traffic micro-simulation
- Analytical traffic models
- Effectiveness assessment
- Scenario management
1 Intersection Scenarios
In this section, selected intersection scenarios are discussed to exemplify the application of some of the methods described in Chap. 7.
1.1 Green Time Extension
Green time extension is a strategy for the platoon to cross the intersection without being split by the traffic light phasing. Conceptually, the intersection’s infrastructure receives information about the incoming platoon and extends the corresponding green phase within predefined limits. This reduces the lost time of the platoon, because the red phase is potentially avoided, as well as the platoon splitting. There is an additional advantage, namely the overall energy saving, because stopping a truck is more energetically expensive than stopping a car. Nevertheless, there is a negative effect for the traffic flow for some of the other streets in the intersection because their corresponding green time is reduced. Micro-simulation models and scenario variations allow to quantify this conflict numerically.
Micro-simulation Model
In order to quantify all these effects, it is necessary to develop a detailed micro-simulation model, as introduced in Sect. 7.1.3, containing the intersection geometry, traffic signs and traffic lights.
In order for the results to be representative, it is also necessary to quantify the initial and boundary conditions in the form of inflows, traffic composition or routing decisions. This can be achieved using the methods described in Sect. 7.1.1.
Systematic Scenario Simulations
Once a validated model is available, it can be used for systematic scenario simulations as described in Sect. 7.1.4. A high number of variants are generated by varying initial conditions, signal plans and control-specific parameters, such as the maximal green time extension. The specific intersection to be modelled is also subject to variation. These variants are then simulated, and the resulting key performance indicators are evaluated (as described in Sect. 7.1.5). As part of the evaluation, the benefits for platoons in terms of reduced lost time as well as the negative effects on other streets can then be analysed.
1.2 Coordinated Drive-Away
A further intersection scenario is the coordinated drive-away when the traffic light is initially red and turns to green during the scenario. The coordinated drive-away has been assessed as a strategy to minimise the accumulated reaction time. Trajectory optimisation methods can be used to calculate the optimal trajectories of the platooning trucks that comply with the given restrictions, such as minimal distance and acceleration limits (see Chap. 8). This assumes that the signal plan is known to the platoon, that is, it is known how many seconds are left until the green phase starts. In the resulting scenario catalogue, several parameters are varied, such as acceleration limits, initial spacing between the vehicles and others.
In this scenario, the focus lies on the evaluation of the minimised lost time in comparison with the lost times that result from the human driving behaviour, specifically the reaction times. It is thus necessary to quantify reaction times at intersections by using naturalistic driving studies, as outlined in Sect. 7.1.2.
1.3 Optimisation of Speeds and Distances Inside the Platoon
Another intersection scenario consists of the optimisation of the speeds and distances inside the platoon by making use of phase plan information. That is, the platoon can drive faster or with less distance between its vehicles in order to reach the green phase, assuming a fixed signal plan.
This strategy reduces the lost time of the platoon, since the red phase can be avoided. The traffic flow is also improved, making a better use of the fixed signal plan. Since platoon stopping or splitting is avoided, the strategy also generates advantages from an energetic point of view.
Assumptions
This scenario assumes that accurate information on the signal plan is known to the platoon, in order to be able to optimise the trajectories accordingly. This information could be sent to the platoon by means of I2V communication.
Systematic Scenario Simulations
In the scenario catalogue, the initial platoon positions and distances are systematically varied, as well as signal plans, vehicle lengths, vehicle characteristics such as acceleration ranges, and control parameters such as speed limits or minimal distances between the vehicles. Another aspect which is subject to variation is the minimal distance to the traffic light at which the trajectories optimisation can begin. It is important to vary this factor, since this is equivalent in evaluating the strategy with different communication ranges, and it allows to quantify the efficacy of different communication ranges in the context of this strategy.
2 Application of Analytic Approaches: Highway Throughput Based on Platooning Headway
This section proposes an example for a scenario in which analytic approaches can be taken. The influence of reduced platooning headway on traffic efficiency is assessed in two stages. First, a theoretical upper limit for the compression of the traffic under simplified assumptions is determined. Second, relevant parameters are sampled from broad ranges, and stochastic results are generated. These can be evaluated either in a very general way or specifically and a posteriori for a set of parameters whose values are unknown at the time of writing but will gradually become available as technology advances.
2.1 Analytical Models for the Traffic Throughput
The theoretical upper limit can be calculated based on mixed platooning (i.e. between all vehicle types) and full penetration with platooning capability. There is a functional relation between speed v, platooning distance \(h_{\text {p}}\) and traffic throughput \(\phi _0\),
where \(L_{\text {veh}}\) is the mean length of the vehicles. By using such analytical relation, it is possible to assess the theoretical upper bound on traffic efficiency that we can achieve with a penetration rate of 100% and mixed platooning. Both assumptions are not realistic in the foreseeable future, so the results explicitly serve as a theoretical upper limit. Figure 9.1 shows the theoretical traffic flow that can be achieved for three levels of truck share.
Using real-world data allows to use realistic truck shares in the traffic, as well as vehicle length distributions by vehicle type. It is then possible to calculate yet more realistic upper limits if arbitrary platooning vehicles penetrations are allowed. The following relation can be formulated:
where
-
\(\rho \) is the density (vehicles/km).
-
\(L_{\text {truck}}\) is the length of the trucks.
-
\(L_{\text {car}}\) is the length of the cars.
-
\(\alpha \) is the proportion of trucks.
-
\(\beta \) is the proportion of platooning trucks over the total number of trucks.
-
\(h_{\text {p}}\) is the distance between the platooning vehicles.
-
h is the distance between the non-platooning vehicles.
The resulting traffic flow is then defined as \(\phi = \rho v\).
2.2 Stochastic Variations
By using an analytical model as above, it is possible to generate a large number of scene variants that include systematic variations of platooning share, traffic composition and vehicle lengths based on real-world data, as well as normal and platooning distances. It is possible to generate scenarios where all of the vehicles or only the trucks can be part of a platoon.
3 Theoretical Lower Limits on Intra-platoon Distance
A further example of the application of the methods of Chap. 7 is the study of the minimal intra-platoon distances for collision avoidance. In this scenario, non-platoon traffic participants are not considered. A stable moving platoon is assumed (constant, suitable speed, stable driving condition of all vehicles). More specifically, in this scenario there is a leading truck and a follower truck.
The leading truck brakes, and the reason of braking (obstacle, other vehicle, etc.) is not of interest here. This is communicated to the follower vehicle in the form of V2V messages. After a given communication delay, the follower truck starts to brake in order to try to avoid the collision. Safe braking distance considerations are illustrated in Fig. 9.2.
3.1 Scenario Definition
Several use cases can be defined, depending on the braking profile of the leading truck:
-
Normal braking.
-
Full braking.
-
Emergency braking.
Following the methodology proposed in Chap. 7, the basic scenarios for the analysis have to be defined. A basic scenario for any of these subcases comprises a combination of:
-
Street geometry, curvature profile.
-
Initial speed.
-
Initial positions.
-
Vehicle characteristics, including braking limits and mass.
-
Friction between street and tyre.
3.2 Evaluation of KPIs
The evaluation parameters that we use to evaluate the results (see Sect. 7.1.5) are the collision probability. In order to be able to quantify these probabilities, several simulations of the scenes are carried out varying the time delay with which the follower truck begins the braking manoeuvre (relative to the leading truck), as well as the braking profile of the follower truck (including acceleration limits and the braking duration). In each of the simulations, a crash can occur. The collision probability is thus the ratio between collisions observed and number simulations for each base scene.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kuhn, A., Carmona, J., Thonhofer, E., Hildenbrandt, D. (2022). Scenario-Based Simulation Studies on Platooning Effects in Traffic. In: Schirrer, A., Gratzer, A.L., Thormann, S., Jakubek, S., Neubauer, M., Schildorfer, W. (eds) Energy-Efficient and Semi-automated Truck Platooning. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88682-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88682-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88681-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88682-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)