Abstract
Forest management can be improved by the mechanistic understanding that tree-ring stable isotopes provide. Key management tools include genetic selection, competing vegetation control, thinning, and fertilization. These tools frequently change environmental conditions and physiological processes, such as photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, water uptake, and nitrogen cycling, which may leave isotopic signatures in tree-rings, providing detailed responses to management over decadal time periods. While data sets remain small, some trends have emerged from previous forest management studies using stable isotopes. Genotype selection sometimes shows isotopic evidence of maladaptation, especially in the presence of climate change. Competition control and thinning have different isotopic reactions depending on the dryness of the site; they generally obtain different responses depending on whether competition is primarily for aboveground (light) or belowground (water and nutrient) resources. Fertilization responses recorded in tree rings appear to be driven by initial increases in photosynthesis, and later by increases in leaf area index. Tree-ring isotopic applications can provide key insights to a much broader range of silvicultural objectives than included here, and we encourage their application in large-scale silvicultural experiments to reduce uncertainties and explain mechanisms of response. In future work, we suggest that management studies wishing to utilize tree-ring stable isotopic analysis include key ancillary measurements, especially leaf nitrogen concentrations, leaf-area index, xylem water sources, and canopy temperature, to help support interpretation of the isotopic data.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Forest management activities are designed to alter stand and tree growth, composition, structure, and/or other ecosystem properties (Smith et al. 1997). Management activities such as thinning, prescribed burning, herbicide application, or fertilization change resource availability within forests, altering tree growth (Fox et al. 2007; Johnson and Curtis 2001; Jurgensen et al. 1997; Neary et al. 1999). However, because these activities often change the availability of multiple resources—including moisture, nutrients, and light (e.g. Jurgensen et al. 1997; Neary et al. 1999)—the physiological or ecological mechanisms responsible for changes in tree growth can be unclear. The forestry research community has long been interested in understanding how management activities affect both resource availability and tree physiology. Their wish has been for more mechanistic prescriptions to meet objectives including the optimization of forest productivity (e.g., Campoe et al. 2013; Forrester et al. 2013; Gauthier and Jacobs 2009; Gspaltl et al. 2013), adaptation to climate change (e.g. Chmura et al. 2011; Lindner et al. 2014; Martin-Benito et al. 2011), and the production and maintenance of ecosystem services (Deal et al. 2012; Ford et al. 2011; Luyssaert et al. 2018).
Stable isotopes are an important tool to understand the response to trees, stands and ecosystems to management because they integrate and trace physical and physiological processes over time and space (Dawson et al. 2002; West et al. 2006; Sulzman 2008; Werner et al. 2012). Forestry researchers were early adopters of some stable isotope techniques (e.g., Heilman et al. 1982; Högberg et al. 1993; Nambiar and Bowen 1986). The use of these techniques has expanded rapidly in the last decade to encompass a variety of management practices in ecosystems from the African savanna to giant sequoia forests in California (e.g., Cramer et al. 2010; York et al. 2010). However, although stable isotopes can be powerful analytical tools, the application and interpretation of stable isotope methods can be complex because numerous abiotic and biotic processes alter the relative abundance of individual isotopes (Dawson et al. 2002; Sulzman 2008; Werner et al. 2012; West et al. 2006).
In this chapter, we describe isotopic consequences of management effects and discuss their mechanistic interpretation. We first present, in chronological order, several of the traditional management tools used in even-aged stands from planting to harvest, largely because much of the isotopic literature examining forest management occurred in such stands. This organization is intended to clarify, not to suggest that forest managers are limited to these tools and applications. In fact, these management tools can be used to foster a broad range of ecosystem services, which isotopic data can help inform. We provide both illustrative examples and, in the cases of nutrient additions (fertilization) and thinning, meta-analyses. We present the results of a new meta-analysis here, but we also summarize an earlier meta-analysis (Sohn et al. 2016) of thinning effects on drought responses of tree growth.
We focus here on carbon isotope discrimination (∆13C, Chap. 9) and oxygen isotopic ratios (δ18O, Chap. 10), with brief mention of nitrogen isotope ratios (δ15 N, Chap. 12). We neglect hydrogen isotope ratios (δ2H) because they are often so correlated with δ18O and because hydrogen exchanges so readily with atmospheric water vapor that the samples must undergo complex preparation (Chap. 11). The method is therefore not prevalent in forest management applications. Intense work is going on with δ2H preparation techniques and it seems likely that they will become more feasible in the near future.
2 Choice of Species and Genotype
One of the most powerful tools of forest management is the ability to select the species and genotypes comprising the stand. Foresters can plant favored trees, cull unwanted species or phenotypes, or create conditions that are favorable for particular trees. Tree species differ substantially in ∆13C, which is correlated with intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE, Chap. 17) defined as the ratio of net photosynthetic rate to stomatal conductance (A/gs). Numerous studies have evaluated interspecific differences in ∆13C in order to evaluate traits such as drought tolerance and water-use efficiency (e.g., Bonhomme et al. 2008; Jansen et al. 2013; Voltas et al. 2006). Broadly, in interspecific studies, deciduous trees show more positive ∆13C and lower iWUE (intrinsic water-use efficiency) than co-occurring needle-leaved evergreens, which themselves have more positive ∆13C and lower iWUE than scale-leaved evergreens (Marshall and Zhang 1994). Long-lived leaves tend to have greater leaf mass per area (g/m2) (Wright et al. 2004), which is associated with lower mesophyll conductance (Flexas et al. 2014; Niinemets et al. 2009). This relationship is thought (Hultine and Marshall 2000) to be the primary reason why a negative correlation between leaf ∆13C and leaf mass per area has been frequently observed (Araus et al. 1997; Hanba et al. 1999; Hultine and Marshall 2000; Körner et al. 1991; Takahashi and Miyajima 2008; Talhelm et al. 2011). In any case, if a forest is likely to deplete the soil water supply during the growing season, then efficient use of that water generally enhances forest growth (Zhang et al. 1995; Zhang and Marshall 1995) and possibly survival (Timofeeva et al. 2017).
Species differences in water access have also been detected in δ18O of xylem water or wood. These differences in water source may be caused by differences in vertical root distribution, where water deeper in the soil tends to be more depleted in heavy isotopes (18O, 2H) than water found near the soil surface (Hartl-Meier et al. 2015; see Chap. 18). This isotopic difference within the soil profile has been used to understand how species partition water resources (Flanagan et al. 1992) and how water-use patterns change seasonally (Dawson 1998; Meinzer et al. 1999). When species are mixed, the root systems may be deployed at different depths, leading to differences in vertical water-uptake. The resulting niche partitioning may give rise to overcompensation, the tendency of a species mixture to be more productive than monospecific stands of either species alone (Pretzsch et al. 2013). However, species mixtures may also lead to growth reductions and mortality for some of the species (Granda et al. 2014). For example, shallow-rooted spruce trees were more negatively influenced by drought than more deeply rooted beech trees in a mixed stand (Brinkmann et al. 2018). Alternatively, differences in tissue or leaf water δ18O may also reflect differences in transpiration timing or rate (Chap. 10). In either case, δ18O differences provide an index of water sources and water use (Marshall and Monserud 2006). When combined with δ13C, δ18O in cellulose may allow one to distinguish whether water-use efficiency has been modified by changes in photosynthesis or transpiration (Scheidegger et al. 2000; see Chap. 16). However, using δ18O to draw insight into leaf gas exchange requires knowledge or assumptions about the δ18O of xylem water (Gessler et al. 2018; Roden and Siegwolf 2012; Chap. 18).
Seedling planting also offers the opportunity to control genetic composition (e.g., species, genotype, and clone) and initial stand structure. In intensive forestry, “tree improvement” is almost always focused on increased timber yield through rapid growth, wood quality, or increased pest resistance. Careless matching of genotype to environment can be deleterious, causing frost damage when coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) was moved inland (Rehfeldt 1977), or suboptimal growth when cold-tolerant lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta; McLane et al. 2011) or Douglas-fir (Leites et al. 2012) were moved to warmer climates. Planting can also be used to assist the migration of warm climate genotypes toward areas that were once too cold for them, but are no longer (Savolainen et al. 2004). Isotopic data have been used as a screening criterion to describe the populations within a species, often from young trees planted in common gardens (Gornall and Guy 2007; Guerra et al. 2016; Monclus et al. 2006). This approach has also identified provenance differences in rooting depth using δ8O (Voltas et al. 2015). Although these studies have mostly focused on ecological questions related to species adaptations to a particular climate, the observed correlation of ∆13C with height growth or biomass production has also been used to justify genotype selections (Marguerit et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 1995; Zhang and Marshall 1994, 1995). In addition, quantitative trait loci have been applied in native populations to determine whether WUE can be increased without decreasing productivity (Brendel et al. 2002, 2008; Marguerit et al. 2014). In a recent paper, Isaac-Renton et al. (2014) provided a compelling assessment of the climate-change consequences of climate maladaptation in lodgepole pine (Fig. 23.1). The northern populations were defined as “leading edge” because the species is presumably moving northward. These northern populations lacked some of the drought adaptations found in the southern “trailing edge” populations, which may reduce their ability to deal with future droughts. Lodgepole pine has been well studied in this respect, but these same questions can and should be asked about other species as well.
3 Control of Competing Vegetation
Managers often prepare sites for planting or improve growing conditions for young trees by removing competing vegetation with herbicides or mechanical treatments. These treatments increase the availability of light, water, and nutrients and improve tree growth. Because competition control increases the availability of several important resources simultaneously, stable isotopes can be useful for identifying the primary mechanism creating the growth response, particularly when complemented by supporting observations.
Competition control often increases ∆13C by releasing water to the trees, which would increase stomatal conductance. For instance, Ares and colleagues (2007) observed that five years of herbicide treatments reduced canopy cover of competing vegetation from 95 to 7% among newly established Douglas-fir saplings on the western slope of the Coast Range in the northwestern United States. For the Douglas-fir, competition control increased tree growth, foliar N concentrations, and soil moisture availability. In analysis of tree ring ∆13C of the Douglas-fir trees, earlywood ∆13C was unaffected by the herbicide treatments, but the latewood was higher in ∆13C, which led Ares et al. (2008) to conclude that increased soil moisture availability in the late summer was the primary driver of increased tree growth. Likewise, in young ponderosa pine seedlings, reduced competition reduced water stress and increased ∆13C (Pinto et al. 2011, 2012). Similarly, removal of understory shrubs from stands of Pinus densiflora in western Japan increased foliar ∆13C and both stomatal conductance and foliar N. Increased foliar ∆13C suggests that the observed increases in growth were caused primarily by increased water availability (Kume et al. 2003).
In contrast, competition control sometimes improves light or nutrient status, which increases photosynthesis, decreasing ∆13C. For instance, mechanical and herbicide treatments to control grass growing beneath 10-year old white spruce (Picea glauca) trees in boreal Canada also increased tree growth, foliar N, and soil moisture, but reduced foliar ∆13C (Matsushima et al. 2012). This reduction in foliar ∆13C, which was correlated with foliar N concentration and coupled with a concomitant increase in foliar δ15 N, led the authors to conclude that the increase in N availability was the primary mechanism by which competition control increased growth in their study. Similarly, competition control decreased red pine (Pinus resinosa) tree ring Δ13C in the north-central United States (Powers et al. 2010). Clearly, the physiological effects of competition control depend on which resources are released and the ability of trees to utilize these resources to acquire C.
4 Thinning
Managers thin forests primarily to increase growth of the remaining trees or to create stands that are more resilient to climate stress, insects, disease, and wildfire. Like the removal of competing vegetation, decreasing tree density within a stand reduces competition for resources that limit tree productivity. Thinning can increase the availability of water, nutrients, and light; trees respond physiologically to an increase in each of those resources with changes in the isotopic signatures recorded in tree rings.
We assessed the ∆13C response across all years and all studies in a meta-analysis (Fig. 23.2) and found that the direction of the discrimination change depended on the mean annual precipitation at the site. While we note that this analysis contains data from only a relative handful of studies, we presume that this reflects differences in physiological responses to thinning. At low precipitation sites, discrimination increases due to the water released to the remaining trees when the thinned trees are removed. The released water increases conductance more than it does photosynthesis, increasing ∆13C relative to the control. In contrast, at sites with high precipitation, ∆13C decreases after thinning, presumably due to improvements in the light or nitrogen status of the remaining trees, either of which would tend to increase rates of net photosynthesis. The water released by thinning sites must have less influence on ∆13C than the light and nutrient increases on these high-precipitation sites. These responses are unlikely to be species-specific responses as nearly all species respond to water stress by decreasing ∆13C (Granda et al. 2014; Grossiord et al. 2014).
Under dry conditions, thinning can mitigate drought stress and tree ring stable isotopes have helped illuminate the physiological mechanisms of drought resistance (Sohn et al. 2012, 2014, 2016). In an earlier meta-analysis of thinning effects on drought response, tree ring isotopic data revealed that in conifers, heavy thinning influenced ∆13C in a drought year more strongly than in the other years (Sohn et al. 2016). The heavy thinning treatments also changed δ18O more strongly in the drought year. However, thinning influenced the isotopic data both before and after the drought year as well. An analysis of ring-width data in the same paper showed clearer patterns, in part because it included broadleaf species. For the broadleaves, thinning appeared to increase soil moisture available to the trees during drought, allowing them to resist changes in growth during the drought year. Voelker et al. (2019) also found that stand basal area influenced drought sensitivity; stands at lower basal areas demonstrated decreasing trends in A/gs, and greater resilience to droughts. However, they found stands with high basal area had increasing trends in A/gs over the same period of time, which they attributed to greater water limitations and lower drought resilience. Kruse et al. (2012) also noted that stand density influenced the degree of stomatal control over A/gs.
In more mesic environments, thinning can increase exposure of the remaining canopy to both greater light and higher vapor pressure deficits, as well as increase nutrient availability (Fig. 23.2). For example, Pinus pinaster, Pinus radiata and Pinus resinosa all decreased ∆13C after thinning, presumably from an increase in A relative to gs from greater light exposure and/or greater leaf nitrogen content (Warren et al. 2001; Powers et al. 2010). However, for Pinus nigra, Pinus halepensis, and Pseudotusga menziesii growing in mesic environments, tree ring ∆13C did not change significantly with thinning while growth increased, implying that both A and gs increased in response to increased canopy light exposure and water resources.
Responses of trees to thinning are not always intuitive. Ruzicka et al. (2017) used ∆13C and ring widths to examine stand responses to thinning in three Douglas-fir sites that varied along a moisture gradient. Similar to what was reported above for mesic sites, trees in the thinned stands grew more at the wet and intermediate sites, but had no significant change in iWUE relative to the unthinned control trees. However, at the driest site, trees in the thinned stand did not produce larger growth increments, and increased in iWUE, which implies that water was not the main limiting factor. Instead, they speculated that gs decreased from greater exposure to the surrounding atmosphere and increased evaporative demand.
Forest thinning is usually applied at long intervals, with a decade or more to recover between operations. Therefore, the physiological responses to thinning should exhibit a regular temporal pattern in the subsequent years. As noted above, when water resources are limiting growth, density reduction should result in greater water availability to the remaining trees. An initial increase in water resources should increase stomatal conductance if leaf area, sapwood area and root area do not immediately adjust. As a result, iWUE would be expected to decrease and discrimination would be expected to increase in water-limited site. As shown by the red and pink points in Fig. 23.3, the expected increase did occur, but only on the driest sites and only in the first and second years after thinning. This may be due to increases in water availability leading to increased growth (McDowell et al. 2003, 2006; Giuggiola et al. 2016; Di Matteo et al. 2010). However, these stands varied in the duration of the response (Fig. 23.3). For example in eastern Oregon, McDowell et al. (2003) examined the change in cellulose δ13C in a stand of 250-year old ponderosa pine trees (Pinus ponderosa) where thinning selectively left the largest trees with wide spacing, removing 60–80% of the basal area. ∆13C increased a year after the thinning treatment and remained higher for at least 12 years when they collected cores, whereas growth differences were not noted until 4 years after the treatment. Predawn water potentials of the foliage were significantly less negative in the thinned trees compared to neighboring control stands, indicating that soil water availability was still higher in the thinned stands 12 years after the treatment. In another ponderosa pine stand located in Arizona, McDowell et al. (2006) noted that after a four-year lag, ∆13C values increased for approximately 12 years of a density reduction experiment (shown in Fig. 23.3 as Sohn et al. 2014, who re-analyzed the McDowell et al. 2006 data). In this study, the basal area increment (BAI) produced in a given year was related to this change in ∆13C, with higher levels of thinning producing a greater increase in ∆13C and greater increases in BAI. However, after 12 years, ∆13C returned to pretreatment levels even though stand densities of the treatments were maintained. They found that the whole tree leaf area to sapwood area had adjusted such that trees in the low basal area stands had significantly more leaf area per unit sapwood area, and suspected that increases in tree leaf area returned to a homeostatic balance of A/gs at pretreatment levels. Giuggiola et al. (2016) found similar results in a xeric Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) thinning experiment they followed for over 40 years. At least in xeric locations, thinning does appear to increase water to the remaining trees initially, increasing stomatal conductance of the existing foliage. However, after a decade or so, the trees at xeric sites adjusted their leaf area and root area and returned to homeostasis in A/gs.
Our meta-analysis of δ18O responses to thinning was based on few studies, but we again found different responses depending on the precipitation amount at the site (Fig. 23.4). The change was positive on the wetter sites and negative on the one drier site. Increases in cellulose δ18O indicate that the environment around the trees changed in some way, perhaps with decreased relative humidity, increased leaf temperatures, and/or shallower root water uptake for the thinned trees (Brooks and Mitchell 2011; Martin-Benito et al. 2011; Moreno‐Gutiérrez et al. 2011). These studies with increased δ18O assumed that source water between control and thinned plots did not change, so speculated that the increases in δ18O from thinning were from increased leaf temperatures from increased solar irradiance, and decreased relative humidity around the foliage from increased boundary layer conductance in the open stands (Jarvis and McNaughton 1986). Canopy coupling to the ambient air is generally high for conifers (Jarvis and McNaughton 1986), which would minimize the change in boundary layer with thinning, but thinning in Brooks and Mitchell (2011) removed 2/3 of the basal area, changing the remaining trees from being in dense closed canopies to having completely exposed canopies (Martin et al. 1999). This dramatic shift in canopy density could be enough change in leaf temperature and relative humidity to cause the modest change in δ18O. However, the assumption of constant water sources between treatments may not be accurate as water uptake may shift within the soil profile. An upward shift in root water uptake in thinned stands might favor more enriched source water (Brinkmann et al. 2018). The downward shift after thinning on the drier site is difficult to explain, but the authors speculated a decrease in the isotopic value of source water in the thinned stands (Sohn et al. 2014). Higher transpiration rates in the thinned stands would lead to use of deeper, isotopically more depleted water sources (Chap. 18). This shift in water uptake might be consistent with the hypothesis presented earlier for these same stands, that the root:shoot balance is modified such that the roots can reach deeper depleted water. In future studies, measurements of xylem source water and leaf temperature between treatments would greatly assist in the process of choosing among these potential explanations.
One additional complication to interpreting tree ring stable isotopes in trees is that stress may increase their reliance on stored carbohydrates (Helle and Schleser 2004). As a result, slow-growing stressed trees appear to have less isotopic variance over time compared to neighboring trees in stands that have been thinned (McDowell et al. 2006; Sohn et al. 2014). Both δ13C and δ18O showed much lower variance between years in control stands and in pretreatment values as compared to after the density reduction (McDowell et al. 2006; Sohn et al. 2014). This difference in isotopic variance for both δ13C and δ18O could be caused by a greater reliance on stored carbohydrates in the slow-growing control trees, which would mute the isotopic response to perturbation in any particular year.
5 Fertilization and Nutrition
Nutrient fertilization is typically applied to forest stands after a pre-commercial or commercial thinning or after stand differentiation has occurred in order to accelerate tree growth and shorten the rotation (Miller 1981). As with thinning, the date of fertilization provides an obvious reference point for analysis of its effects, and tree ring studies can compare pre- and post-treatment responses. As noted above, the response of ∆13C to fertilization depends on the mechanism of response. If fertilization increases the nitrogen concentration within foliage, photosynthesis would be expected to increase (Brix 1971, 1981). Since water resources are not directly altered by fertilization, stomatal conductance could be expected to remain similar to pre-fertilization rates. Thus, increases in foliar N concentration are expected to decrease ∆13C and increase iWUE.
In the meta-analysis of ∆13C, we found a short-term response that generally supported this scenario (Fig. 23.5). Discrimination decreased in years 1 and 2, however the significant effect disappeared thereafter. However, the responses among individual studies were rather different (Fig. 23.6). For example, Brooks and Mitchell (2011) found reduced discrimination, yielding the negative values in Fig. 23.6, for at least four years after fertilization in a nutrient-limited coastal Douglas-fir stand. These decreases in discrimination were correlated with increases in measured leaf nitrogen levels (Mitchell et al. 1996). Similarly, Brooks and Coulombe (2009) found a decrease in ∆13C for four years after fertilization in another nutrient-limited Douglas-fir stand in the Cascade Mountains, and speculated a similar increase in foliage nitrogen. Increasing foliar nitrogen is a common short-term response in these fertilization studies and as with studies of competition control and thinning, the increase in foliar N can help support interpretation of ∆13C and δ18O observations. For this reason, we suggest that measurement of foliar N should be incorporated in future stable isotope studies of leaf gas exchange.
In the longer term, fertilization can also cause increases in foliage leaf area, which may dilute the foliar nitrogen (Balster and Marshall 2000; Binkley and Reid 1985). If leaf area increases without an increase in foliar N levels, then foliar gas-exchange rates and ∆13C may not change. Photosynthetic rates may even decrease due to canopy shading, in which case ∆13C might increase. Note that this would offset the decrease that follows the fertilization immediately after the application. In the Brooks and Mitchell (2011) study, the decrease in ∆13C was observed even in the 10th and 11th years after fertilization. Likewise, the growth increase lasted many more years and both stands were documented to have increased in leaf area. It is plausible that longer-term decreases in ∆13C in response to fertilization could be a consequence of increased leaf area or height growth, either of which might lead to stomatal closure (McDowell et al. 2002, 2011). In contrast to Brooks and Mitchell (2011), Balster et al. (2009) found no significant shifts in ∆13C from fertilization in Douglas-fir at 24 sites located in the interior northwest USA, although growth responses lasted for 8 years after treatment. However, leaf area index was increased (Balster and Marshall, 2000), providing a likely increase in canopy photosynthesis without a change in the gas-exchange setpoint reflected in ∆13C.
Antecedent site fertility influences the longevity of the ∆13C response to fertilization. Cornejo-Oviedo et al. (2017) found an increase in iWUE in both late and earlywood one year after fertilization in a productive coastal stand, in contrast to the 3–4 year increase in more nutrient limited stands mentioned above. Site moisture availability also has an influence. Liles et al. (2019) found no changes in iWUE in their most productive, wettest ponderosa pine site, but found increases in iWUE from fertilization at their drier sites.
Changes in δ18O in response to fertilization might be expected if fertilization influenced transpiration, the canopy microclimate (mostly relative humidity) or the source water accessed by the trees (Chaps. 10, 16, and 18). Some fertilization studies have reported strong changes to δ18O, while others have reported no significant changes. Brooks and Coulombe (2009) found a 2% increase in latewood δ18O with fertilization that lasted nearly a decade with the highest level of fertilization, but no change relative to controls for earlywood. They speculated that the δ18O increase in latewood was caused by the combination of high leaf-area index and late-summer drought in the dry Mediterranean summers of the Pacific Northwestern USA.
Although δ18O data showed significant treatment effects to the fertilization in a range of studies (Fig. 23.7), the effects were in different directions and they occurred at different times. Interpretation is limited by the small number of studies and the many possible sources of variation (Roden and Siegwolf 2012). Especially important are understanding which δ18O differences are caused by changes in canopy conditions and exposure following thinning and fertilization, as well as source-water variation (Sarris et al. 2013). Source water could be tested by measuring the isotopic composition of xylem water (Marshall et al. 2020; Volkmann et al. 2016; White et al. 1985). We strongly recommend these measurements to minimize the uncertainties in these studies.
Nitrogen fertilization can also influence the δ15 N of tree rings (Elhani et al. 2005; Peñuelas and Estiarte 1996; Poulson et al. 1995), particularly when the applied nitrogen has a different isotopic composition than native nitrogen in the soil, or when the fertilizer material tends to volatilize, leading to strong kinetic fractionation and a δ15 N increase in the remaining nitrogen. This occurred in a study in which urea was applied to Douglas-fir forests in the northwestern US (Balster et al. 2009). In this study, the urea was converted to NH4+, which is quickly transformed to NH3 and released to the atmosphere. Although the fertilizer could not be detected through increases in wood N concentrations, the δ15 N was significantly enriched in fertilized trees. Tree ring δ15 N analyses are difficult because the nitrogen concentrations in wood are so low compared to leaves or roots (Chap. 12). Further, interpretation of tree ring δ15 N data should recognize that the labeled nitrogen can be translocated across the rings over time (Balster et al. 2009; Hart and Classen 2003; Sheppard and Thompson 2000), unlike the isotopic labels embedded in the C, H, and O in cell walls.
Experimental long-term annual fertilization is sometimes applied in forests. In such cases, changes in δ15 N of plant tissues can be stark (Högberg and Johannisson 1993; Marshall and Linder 2013). Although they do not simulate standard management practice, these studies provide clear insights into mechanism of response. These clear differences are attributed to a combination of decreased N retention by mycorrhizal fungi and increased leaching of depleted nitrate, both of which tend to enrich 15 N in leaves and tree rings (Högberg et al. 2014).
6 Modeling of Management Effects
Although stable isotopes are often used for assessment of treatment responses, the milieu of environmental, ecological, and physiological changes can be complex and difficult to interpret. These complexities can be addressed via models of tree ecophysiology and forest growth (see Chap. 26). This is especially important because forest management decisions are often driven by expectations about future growth. Wei et al. (2014) used ∆13C data to parameterize a physiological growth model in an attempt to explain how large increases in tree growth were obtained from replicated fertilization and herbicide treatments. The model, 3-PG, includes an empirical parameter that describes the influence of nutrition on photosynthate allocation. Wei et al. (2014) set that parameter to its maximum in the treatments that combined fertilizer and herbicide, then empirically fitted the parameter to the other treatments. This was possible because all of the major fluxes of carbon and water were measured, as was the ∆13C of photosynthate. With so many parameters constrained by measurements, the allocation parameter could be fitted with more confidence.
The 3-PG model has also recently been modified to predict tree-ring δ18O (Ulrich et al. 2019). The model was applied to ponderosa pine trees growing over 107 years in a riparian and an upslope area. Key parameters in the δ18O model remained difficult to measure or verify, in particular the Péclet effect, which describes the back-diffusion of enriched water against the xylem flow into the leaf (Chap. 10). However, the model provided a validated estimate of the gas-exchange predictions based on their isotopic consequences. Such constraints would increase the confidence of model predictions as it is used, for example, to predict responses to changed climates, genotypes, or novel management regimes.
These models might be usefully combined with the meta-analyses presented above. In particular, it would be worthwhile to vary precipitation amount or soil depth to create differences in water availability and then thin or fertilize the modeled stand. If such an exercise could recreate the pattern observed in Fig. 23.2, it would increase our confidence in interpreting it as an effect of water availability. Likewise, if the site-specificity of the fertilization response in Fig. 23.6 could be recreated by site-specific parameterization of the models, this would help to explain the differences in direction and timing of the fertilization response.
7 Conclusions
Stable isotope analysis of tree rings is a powerful tool for exploring the long-term and complex physiological responses to forest management. The thinning response differs between wet and dry sites, where the trees reduce their water-use efficiency on dry sites and increase it on wet. These patterns are consistent with the release of water limitations on dry sites and of light and nutrient limitations on wet sites. Carbon isotope discrimination data revealed that fertilization has two dominant effects: a short-term increase in foliar nitrogen, and a longer-term increase in leaf area. We have noted the timing and site-specificity of the isotopic changes after thinning and fertilization, which indicate that physiological responses to these management actions can last for decades, but the responses vary in direction and timing among studies. We encourage the development and parameterization of models to test the mechanisms proposed here and to improve predictions about management responses at a given site. Stable isotope tree-ring studies on management actions could reduce uncertainties and explain mechanisms of response, especially with increased auxiliary measurements of leaf nitrogen, leaf area, and xylem and soil water isotopes.
References
Araus JL, Amaro T, Zuhair Y, Nachit MM (1997) Effect of leaf structure and water status on carbon isotope discrimination in field-grown durum wheat. Plant, Cell Environ 20(12):1484–1494. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-43.x
Ares A, Harrington CA, Terry TA, Kraft JM (2008) Vegetation control effects on untreated wood, crude cellulose and holocellulose δ13C of early and latewood in 3 to 5-year-old rings of Douglas-fir. Trees 22(5):603–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0227-6
Ares A, Terry T, Harrington C, Devine W, Peter D, Bailey J (2007) Biomass removal, soil compaction, and vegetation control effects on five-year growth of Douglas-fir in coastal Washington. For Sci 53(5):600–610. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/53.5.600
Balster NJ, Marshall JD (2000) Decreased needle longevity of fertilized Douglas-fir and grand fir in the northern Rockies. Tree Physiol 20(17):1191–1197
Balster NJ, Marshall JD, Clayton M (2009) Coupling tree-ring δ13C and δ15N to test the effect of fertilization on mature Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. Glauca) stands across the Interior northwest, USA. Tree Phys 29(12):1491–1501
Binkley D, Reid P (1985) Long-term increase of nitrogen availability from fertilization of Douglas-fir. Can J For Res 15(4):723–724. https://doi.org/10.1139/x85-117
Bonhomme L, Barbaroux C, Monclus R, Morabito D, Berthelot A, Villar M, Dreyer E, Brignolas F (2008) Genetic variation in productivity, leaf traits and carbon isotope discrimination in hybrid poplars cultivated on contrasting sites. Ann For Sci 65(5):503–503. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2008024
Brendel O, Pot D, Plomion C, Rozenberg P, Guehl J-M (2002) Genetic parameters and QTL analysis of δ13C and ring width in maritime pine. Plant, Cell Environ 25(8):945–953. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00872.x
Brendel O, Le Thiec D, Scotti-Saintagne C, Bodénès C, Kremer A, Guehl J-M (2008) Quantitative trait loci controlling water use efficiency and related traits in Quercus robur L. Tree Genet Genomes 4(2):263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-007-0107-z
Brinkmann N, Seeger S, Weiler M, Buchmann N, Eugster W, Kahmen A (2018) Employing stable isotopes to determine the residence times of soil water and the temporal origin of water taken up by Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies in a temperate forest. New Phytol 219(4):1300–1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15255
Brix H (1971) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on photosynthesis and respiration in Douglas-Fir. For Sci 17(4):407–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/17.4.407
Brix H (1981) Effects of nitrogen fertilizer source and application rates on foliar nitrogen concentration, photosynthesis, and growth of Douglas-fir. Can J For Res 11(4):775–780. https://doi.org/10.1139/x81-111
Brooks JR, Coulombe R (2009) Physiological responses to fertilization recorded in tree rings: isotopic lessons from a long-term fertilization trial. Ecol Appl 19(4):1044–1060. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0310.1
Brooks JR, Mitchell AK (2011) Interpreting tree responses to thinning and fertilization using tree-ring stable isotopes. New Phytol 190(3):770–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03627.x
Campoe OC, Stape JL, Albaugh TJ, Lee Allen H, Fox TR, Rubilar R, Binkley D (2013) Fertilization and irrigation effects on tree level aboveground net primary production, light interception and light use efficiency in a loblolly pine plantation. For Ecol Manage 288:43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.05.026
Chmura DJ, Anderson PD, Howe GT, Harrington CA, Halofsky JE, Peterson DL, Shaw DC, Brad St. Clair J (2011) Forest responses to climate change in the northwestern United States: ecophysiological foundations for adaptive management. For Ecol Manag 261(7):1121–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.040
Cornejo-Oviedo EH, Voelker SL, Mainwaring DB, Maguire DA, Meinzer FC, Brooks JR (2017) Basal area growth, carbon isotope discrimination, and intrinsic water use efficiency after fertilization of Douglas-fir in the Oregon coast range. For Ecol Manage 389:285–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.005
Cramer MD, Cauter AV, Bond WJ (2010) Growth of N2-fixing African savanna Acacia species is constrained by below-ground competition with grass. J Ecol 98(1):156–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01594.x
Dawson TE (1998) Fog in the California redwood forest: ecosystem inputs and use by plants. Oecologia 117(4):476–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050683
Dawson TE, Mambelli S, Plamboeck AH, Templer PH, Tu KP (2002) Stable isotopes in plant ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33(1):507–559. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.020602.095451
Deal RL, Cochran B, LaRocco G (2012) Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management. For Policy Econ 17:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.007
Elhani S, Guehl J-M, Nys C, Picard J-F, Dupouey J-L (2005) Impact of fertilization on tree-ring 15N and 13C in beech stands: a retrospective analysis. Tree Physiol 25(11):1437–1446. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.11.1437
Flanagan LB, Ehleringer JR, Marshall JD (1992) Differential uptake of summer precipitation among co-occurring trees and shrubs in a pinyon-juniper woodland. Plant, Cell Environ 15(7):831–836
Flexas J, Carriquí M, Coopman RE, Gago J, Galmés J, Martorell S, Morales F, Diaz-Espejo A (2014) Stomatal and mesophyll conductances to CO2 in different plant groups: underrated factors for predicting leaf photosynthesis responses to climate change? Plant Sci 226:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.06.011
Ford CR, Laseter SH, Swank WT, Vose JM (2011) Can forest management be used to sustain water-based ecosystem services in the face of climate change? Ecol Appl 21(6):2049–2067. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-2246.1
Forrester DI, Collopy JJ, Beadle CL, Baker TG (2013) Effect of thinning, pruning and nitrogen fertiliser application on light interception and light-use efficiency in a young Eucalyptus nitens plantation. For Ecol Manage 288:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.024
Fox TR, Jokela EJ, Allen HL (2007) The development of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. J For 105(7):337–347. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/105.7.337
Gauthier M-M, Jacobs DF (2009) Short-term physiological responses of black Walnut (Juglans nigra L.) to plantation thinning. For Sci 55(3):221–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/55.3.221
Gessler A, Cailleret M, Joseph J, Schönbeck L, Schaub M, Lehmann M, Treydte K, Rigling A, Timofeeva G, Saurer M (2018) Drought induced tree mortality—a tree-ring isotope based conceptual model to assess mechanisms and predispositions. New Phytol 219(2):485–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15154
Giuggiola A, Ogée J, Rigling A, Gessler A, Bugmann H, Treydte K (2016) Improvement of water and light availability after thinning at a xeric site: which matters more? A dual isotope approach. New Phytol 210(1):108–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13748
Gornall JL, Guy RD (2007) Geographic variation in ecophysiological traits of black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa). This article is one of a selection of papers published in the special issue on poplar research in Canada. Can J Bot 85(12):1202–1213. https://doi.org/10.1139/B07-079
Granda E, Rossatto DR, Camarero JJ, Voltas J, Valladares F (2014) Growth and carbon isotopes of Mediterranean trees reveal contrasting responses to increased carbon dioxide and drought. Oecologia 174(1):307–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2742-4
Grossiord C, Granier A, Ratcliffe S, Bouriaud O, Bruelheide H, Chećko E, Forrester DI, Dawud SM, Finér L, Pollastrini M, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Valladares F, Bonal D, Gessler A (2014) Tree diversity does not always improve resistance of forest ecosystems to drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(41):14812–14815. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411970111
Gspaltl M, Bauerle W, Binkley D, Sterba H (2013) Leaf area and light use efficiency patterns of Norway spruce under different thinning regimes and age classes. For Ecol Manage 288:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.044
Guerra FP, Richards JH, Fiehn O, Famula R, Stanton BJ, Shuren R, Sykes R, Davis MF, Neale DB (2016) Analysis of the genetic variation in growth, ecophysiology, and chemical and metabolomic composition of wood of Populus trichocarpa provenances. Tree Genet Genomes 12(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-015-0965-8
Hanba YT, Miyazawa S-I, Terashima I (1999) The influence of leaf thickness on the CO2 transfer conductance and leaf stable carbon isotope ratio for some evergreen tree species in Japanese warm-temperate forests. Funct Ecol 13(5):632–639. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00364.x
Hart SC, Classen AT (2003) Potential for assessing long-term dynamics in soil nitrogen availability from variations in δ 15N of tree rings. Isot Environ Health Stud 39(1):15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1025601031000102206
Hartl-Meier C, Zang C, Büntgen U, Esper J, Rothe A, Göttlein A, Dirnböck T, Treydte K (2015) Uniform climate sensitivity in tree-ring stable isotopes across species and sites in a mid-latitude temperate forest. Tree Physiol 35(1):4–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpu096
Heilman PE, Dao TH, Cheng HH, Webster SR, Christensen L (1982) Comparison of fall and spring applications of 15N-labeled urea to Douglas-Fir: II. Fertilizer nitrogen recovery in trees and soil after 2 years. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46(6):1300–1304. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600060035x
Helle G, Schleser GH (2004) Beyond CO2-fixation by Rubisco—an interpretation of 13C/12C variations in tree rings from novel intra-seasonal studies on broad-leaf trees. Plant, Cell Environ 27(3):367–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0016-8025.2003.01159.x
Högberg P, Johannisson C (1993) 15N Abundance of forests is correlated with losses of nitrogen. Plant Soil 157(1):147–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038758
Högberg P, Johannisson C, Hällgren J-E (1993) Studies of 13C in the foliage reveal interactions between nutrients and water in forest fertilization experiments. Plant Soil 152(2):207–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029090
Högberg P, Johannisson C, Högberg MN (2014) Is the high 15N natural abundance of trees in N-loaded forests caused by an internal ecosystem N isotope redistribution or a change in the ecosystem N isotope mass balance? Biogeochem 117(2):351–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9873-x
Hultine KR, Marshall JD (2000) Altitude trends in conifer leaf morphology and stable carbon isotope composition. Oecologia 123(1):32–40
Isaac-Renton MG, Roberts DR, Hamann A, Spiecker H (2014) Douglas-fir plantations in Europe: a retrospective test of assisted migration to address climate change. Glob Change Biol 20(8):2607–2617. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12604
Jansen K, Sohrt J, Kohnle U, Ensminger I, Gessler A (2013) Tree ring isotopic composition, radial increment and height growth reveal provenance-specific reactions of Douglas-fir towards environmental parameters. Trees 27(1):37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-012-0765-9
Jarvis PG, McNaughton KG (1986) Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. In: MacFadyen A, Ford ED (eds) Advances in ecological research, vol 15. Academic Press, pp 1–49 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60119-1
Johnson DW, Curtis PS (2001) Effects of forest management on soil C and N storage: meta analysis. For Ecol Manage 140(2):227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00282-6
Jurgensen MF, Harvey AE, Graham RT, Page-Dumroese DS, Tonn JR, Larsen MJ, Jain TB (1997) Impacts of timber harvesting on soil organic matter, nitrogen, productivity, and health of inland Northwest forests. For Sci 43(2):234–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/43.2.234
Körner Ch, Farquhar GD, Wong SC (1991) Carbon isotope discrimination by plants follows latitudinal and altitudinal trends. Oecologia 88(1):30–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328400
Krause K, Cherubini P, Bugmann H, Schleppi P (2012) Growth enhancement of Picea abies trees under long-term, low-dose N addition is due to morphological more than to physiological changes. Tree Physiol 32(12):1471–1481. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tps109
Kruse J, Hopmans P, Rennenberg H, Adams M (2012) Modern tools to tackle traditional concerns: evaluation of site productivity and Pinus radiata management via δ13C- and δ18O-analysis of tree-rings. For Ecol Manage 285:227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.011
Kume A, Satomura T, Tsuboi N, Chiwa M, Hanba YT, Nakane K, Horikoshi T, Sakugawa H (2003) Effects of understory vegetation on the ecophysiological characteristics of an overstory pine, Pinus densiflora. For Ecol Manag 176(1):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00282-7
Leavitt SW, Long A (1986) Stable-carbon isotope variability in tree foliage and wood. Ecol 67(4):1002–1010. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939823
Leites LP, Robinson AP, Rehfeldt GE, Marshall JD, Crookston NL (2012) Height-growth response to climatic changes differs among populations of Douglas-fir: a novel analysis of historic data. Ecol Appl 22(1):154–165
Liles GC, Maxwell TM, Silva LCR, Zhang J, Horwath WR (2019) Two decades of experimental manipulation reveal potential for enhanced biomass accumulation and water use efficiency in ponderosa pine plantations across climate gradients. J Geophy Res Biogeosci 124:2321–2334, 9(1982), 121. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005183
Lindner M, Fitzgerald JB, Zimmermann NE, Reyer C, Delzon S, van der Maaten E, Schelhaas M-J, Lasch P, Eggers J, van der Maaten-Theunissen M, Suckow F, Psomas A, Poulter B, Hanewinkel M (2014) Climate change and European forests: what do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management? J Environ Manage 146:69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.030
Luyssaert S, Marie G, Valade A, Chen Y-Y, Njakou Djomo S, Ryder J, Otto J, Naudts K, Lansø AS, Ghattas J, McGrath MJ (2018) Trade-offs in using European forests to meet climate objectives. Nature 562(7726):259–262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0577-1
Marguerit E, Bouffier L, Chancerel E, Costa P, Lagane F, Guehl J-M, Plomion C, Brendel O (2014) The genetics of water-use efficiency and its relation to growth in maritime pine. J Exp Bot 65(17):4757–4768. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru226
Marshall JD, Cuntz M, Beyer M, Dubbert M, Kuehnhammer K (2020) Borehole equilibration: testing a new method to monitor the isotopic composition of tree xylem water in situ. Front Plant Sci 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00358
Marshall JD, Linder S (2013) Mineral nutrition and elevated [CO2] interact to modify δ13C, an index of gas exchange, in Norway spruce. Tree Phys 33(11):1132–1144
Marshall JD, Monserud RA (2006) Co-occurring species differ in tree-ring δ18O trends. Tree Physiol 26(8):1055–1066
Marshall JD, Zhang J (1994) Carbon isotope discrimination and water-use efficiency in native plants of the north-central Rockies. Ecol 75(7):1887–1895. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941593
Martin TA, Hinckley TM, Meinzer FC, Sprugel DG (1999) Boundary layer conductance, leaf temperature and transpiration of Abies amabilis branches. Tree Physiol 19(7):435–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/19.7.435
Martin-Benito D, Kint V, del Río M, Muys B, Cañellas I (2011) Growth responses of West-Mediterranean Pinus nigra to climate change are modulated by competition and productivity: past trends and future perspectives. For Ecol Manage 262(6):1030–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.038
Matsushima M, Choi W-J, Chang SX (2012) White spruce foliar δ13C and δ15N indicate changed soil N availability by understory removal and N fertilization in a 13-year-old boreal plantation. Plant Soil 361(1):375–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1254-z
Matteo G, Angelis P, Brugnoli E, Cherubini P, Scarascia-Mugnozza G (2010) Tree-ring Δ13C reveals the impact of past forest management on water-use efficiency in a Mediterranean oak coppice in Tuscany (Italy). Ann For Sci 67(5):510–510. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010012
McDowell N, Barnard H, Bond B, Hinckley T, Hubbard R, Ishii H, Köstner B, Magnani F, Marshall J, Meinzer F (2002) The relationship between tree height and leaf area: sapwood area ratio. Oecologia 132(1):12–20
McDowell N, Brooks JR, Fitzgerald SA, Bond BJ (2003) Carbon isotope discrimination and growth response of old Pinus ponderosa trees to stand density reductions. Plant, Cell Environ 26(4):631–644
McDowell NG, Adams HD, Bailey JD, Hess M, Kolb TE (2006) Homeostatic maintenance of ponderosa pine gas exchange in response to stand density changes. Ecol Appl 16(3):1164–1182. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1164:HMOPPG]2.0.CO;2
McDowell NG, Bond BJ, Dickman LT, Ryan MG, Whitehead D (2011) Relationships between tree height and carbon isotope discrimination. In: Frederick C Meinzer, B Lachenbruch, TE Dawson (eds) Size- and age-related changes in tree structure and function. Springer Netherlands, pp 255–286 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1242-3_10
McLane SC, LeMay VM, Aitken SN (2011) Modeling lodgepole pine radial growth relative to climate and genetics using universal growth-trend response functions. Ecol Appl 21(3):776–788. JSTOR
Meinzer FC, Andrade JL, Goldstein G, Holbrook NM, Cavelier J, Wright SJ (1999) Partitioning of soil water among canopy trees in a seasonally dry tropical forest. Oecologia 121(3):293–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050931
Miller HG (1981) Forest fertilization: some guiding concepts. For 54(2):157–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/54.2.157
Mitchell AK, Barclay HJ, Brix H, Pollard DFW, Benton R, deJong R (1996) Biomass and nutrient element dynamics in Douglas-fir: effects of thinning and nitrogen fertilization over 18 years. Can J For Res 26(3):376–388. https://doi.org/10.1139/x26-042
Monclus R, Dreyer E, Villar M, Delmotte FM, Delay D, Petit J-M, Barbaroux C, Thiec DL, Bréchet C, Brignolas F (2006) Impact of drought on productivity and water use efficiency in 29 genotypes of Populus deltoides × Populus nigra. New Phytol 169(4):765–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01630.x
Moreno-Gutiérrez C, Barberá GG, Nicolás E, Luis MD, Castillo VM, Martínez-Fernández F, Querejeta JI (2011) Leaf δ18O of remaining trees is affected by thinning intensity in a semiarid pine forest. Plant, Cell Environ 34(6):1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02300.x
Nambiar EK, Bowen GD (1986) Uptake, distribution and retranslocation of nitrogen by Pinus radiata from 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to podzolized sandy soil. For Ecol Manage 15(4):269–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(86)90164-7
Navarro-Cerrillo RM, Sánchez-Salguero R, Rodriguez C, Duque Lazo J, Moreno-Rojas JM, Palacios-Rodriguez G, Camarero JJ (2019) Is thinning an alternative when trees could die in response to drought? The case of planted Pinus nigra and P. Sylvestris stands in southern Spain. For Ecol Manage 433:313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.11.006
Neary DG, Klopatek CC, DeBano LF, Ffolliott PF (1999) Fire effects on belowground sustainability: a review and synthesis. For Ecol Manage 122(1):51–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00032-8
Niinemets Ü, Díaz-Espejo A, Flexas J, Galmés J, Warren CR (2009) Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field. J Exp Bot 60(8):2249–2270. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp036
Peñuelas J, Estiarte M (1996) Trends in plant carbon concentration and plant demand for N throughout this century. Oecologia 109(1):69–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050059
Pinto JR, Marshall JD, Dumroese RK, Davis AS, Cobos DR (2011) Establishment and growth of container seedlings for reforestation: a function of stocktype and edaphic conditions. For Ecol Manage 261(11):1876–1884
Pinto JR, Marshall JD, Dumroese RK, Davis AS, Cobos DR (2012) Photosynthetic response, carbon isotopic composition, survival, and growth of three stock types under water stress enhanced by vegetative competition. Can J For Res 42(2):333–344
Poulson SR, Chamberlain CP, Friedland AJ (1995) Nitrogen isotope variation of tree rings as a potential indicator of environmental change. Chem Geol 125(3):307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(95)00097-6
Powers MD, Pregitzer KS, Palik BJ, Webster CR (2010) Wood δ13C, δ18O and radial growth responses of residual red pine to variable retention harvesting. Tree Physiol 30(3):326–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpp119
Pretzsch H, Schütze G, Uhl E (2013) Resistance of European tree species to drought stress in mixed versus pure forests: evidence of stress release by inter-specific facilitation. Plant Biol 15(3):483–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00670.x
Rehfeldt GE (1977) Growth and cold hardiness of intervarietal hybrids of douglas-fir. Theor Appl Genet 50(1):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00273790
Roden J, Siegwolf R (2012) Is the dual-isotope conceptual model fully operational? Tree Physiol 32(10):1179–1182
Ruzicka KJ, Puettmann KJ, Brooks JR (2017) Cross-scale interactions affect tree growth and intrinsic water use efficiency and highlight the importance of spatial context in managing forests under global change. J Ecol 105(5):1425–1436. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12749
Sarris D, Siegwolf R, Körner C (2013) Inter- and intra-annual stable carbon and oxygen isotope signals in response to drought in Mediterranean pines. Agric For Meteorol 168:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.08.007
Savolainen O, Bokma F, Garcı́a-Gil R, Komulainen P, Repo T (2004) Genetic variation in cessation of growth and frost hardiness and consequences for adaptation of Pinus sylvestris to climatic changes. For Ecol Manag 197(1):79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.006
Scheidegger Y, Saurer M, Bahn M, Siegwolf R (2000) Linking stable oxygen and carbon isotopes with stomatal conductance and photosynthetic capacity: a conceptual model. Oecologia 125(3):350–357. https://doi.org/10.2307/4222781
Sheppard P, Thompson TL (2000) Effect of extraction pretreatment on radial variation of nitrogen concentration in tree rings. J Environ Qual 29(6):2037–2042
Smith DM, Larson BC, Kelty MJ, Ashton PMS (1997) The practice of silviculture: applied forest ecology. 9th edn. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19980608088
Sohn JA, Brooks JR, Bauhus J, Kohler M, Kolb TE, McDowell NG (2014) Unthinned slow-growing ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) trees contain muted isotopic signals in tree rings as compared to thinned trees. Trees 28(4):1035–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-014-1016-z
Sohn JA, Kohler M, Gessler A, Bauhus J (2012) Interactions of thinning and stem height on the drought response of radial stem growth and isotopic composition of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Tree Physiol 32(10):1199–1213. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tps077
Sohn JA, Saha S, Bauhus J (2016) Potential of forest thinning to mitigate drought stress: a meta-analysis. For Ecol Manage 380:261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.046
Sulzman EW (2008) Stable isotope chemistry and measurement: a primer. In stable isotopes in ecology and environmental science. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp 1–21 https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470691854.ch1
Takahashi K, Miyajima Y (2008) Relationships between leaf life span, leaf mass per area, and leaf nitrogen cause different altitudinal changes in leaf δ13C between deciduous and evergreen species. Bot 86(11):1233–1241. https://doi.org/10.1139/B08-093
Talhelm AF, Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ (2011) No evidence that chronic nitrogen additions increase photosynthesis in mature sugar maple forests. Ecol Appl 21(7):2413–2424. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-2076.1
Timofeeva G, Treydte K, Bugmann H, Rigling A, Schaub M, Siegwolf R, Saurer M (2017) Long-term effects of drought on tree-ring growth and carbon isotope variability in Scots pine in a dry environment. Tree Physiol 37(8):1028–1041. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx041
Ulrich DEM, Still C, Brooks JR, Kim Y, Meinzer FC (2019) Investigating old-growth ponderosa pine physiology using tree-rings, δ13C, δ18O, and a process-based model. Ecol 100(6):e02656. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2656
Voelker SL, Merschel AG, Meinzer FC, Ulrich DEM, Spies TA, Still CJ (2019) Fire deficits have increased drought sensitivity in dry conifer forests: fire frequency and tree-ring carbon isotope evidence from central Oregon. Glob Change Biol 25(4):1247–1262. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14543
Volkmann THM, Kühnhammer K, Herbstritt B, Gessler A, Weiler M (2016) A method for in situ monitoring of the isotope composition of tree xylem water using laser spectroscopy. Plant, Cell Environ 39(9):2055–2063. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12725
Voltas J, Lucabaugh D, Chambel MR, Ferrio JP (2015) Intraspecific variation in the use of water sources by the circum-Mediterranean conifer Pinus halepensis. New Phytol 208(4):1031–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13569
Voltas J, Serrano L, Hernández M, Pemán J (2006) Carbon isotope discrimination, gas exchange and stem growth of four Euramerican hybrid poplars under different watering regimes. New for 31(3):435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-0879-7
Walia A, Guy RD, White B (2010) Carbon isotope discrimination in western hemlock and its relationship to mineral nutrition and growth. Tree Physiol 30(6):728–740. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpq020
Warren CR, McGrath JF, Adams MA (2001) Water availability and carbon isotope discrimination in conifers. Oecologia 127(4):476–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000609
Wei L, Marshall JD, Zhang J, Zhou H, Powers RF (2014) 3-PG simulations of young ponderosa pine plantations under varied management intensity: why do they grow so differently? For Ecol Manage 313:69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.035
Werner C, Schnyder H, Cuntz M, Keitel C, Zeeman MJ, Dawson TE, Badeck F-W, Brugnoli E, Ghashghaie J, Grams TEE, Kayler ZE, Lakatos M, Lee X, Máguas C, Ogée J, Rascher KG, Siegwolf RTW, Unger S, Welker J, Gessler A (2012) Progress and challenges in using stable isotopes to trace plant carbon and water relations across scales. Biogeosciences 9(8):3083–3111. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3083-2012
West JB, Bowen GJ, Cerling TE, Ehleringer JR (2006) Stable isotopes as one of nature’s ecological recorders. Trends Ecol Evol 21(7):408–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.04.002
White JWC, Cook ER, Lawrence JR, and Wallace SB (1985) The DH ratios of sap in trees: implications for water sources and tree ring DH ratios. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 49(1), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(85)90207-8
Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428(6985):821–827. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02403
York RA, Fuchs D, Battles JJ, Stephens SL (2010) Radial growth responses to gap creation in large, old Sequoiadendron giganteum. Appl Veg Sci 13(4):498–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01089.x
Zhang J, Marshall JD (1994) Population differences in water-use efficiency of well-watered and water-stressed western larch seedlings. Can J For Res 24(1):92–99
Zhang J, Marshall JD, Jaquish BC (1995) Genetic differentiation in carbon isotope discrimination and gas exchange in Pseudotsuga menziesii. A common-garden experiment. Oecologia 101(1):132
Zhang JW, Marshall, JD (1995) Variation in carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthetic gas exchange among populations of Pseudotsuga menziesii and Pinus ponderosa in different environments. Funct Ecol 402–412
Acknowledgements
This chapter has been subjected to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency review and has been approved for publication. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. JDM was supported by the K.A. Wallenberg Foundation (#2015.0047).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 © The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marshall, J.D., Brooks, J.R., Talhelm, A.F. (2022). Forest Management and Tree-Ring Isotopes. In: Siegwolf, R.T.W., Brooks, J.R., Roden, J., Saurer, M. (eds) Stable Isotopes in Tree Rings. Tree Physiology, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92698-4_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92698-4_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92697-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92698-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)