Abstract
Anthropogenic activities such as industrialization, land use change and intensification of agriculture strongly contribute to changes in the concentrations of atmospheric trace gases. Carbon dioxide (CO2), oxidized N compounds (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2) and ozone (O3) have particularly significant impacts on plant physiology. CO2, the substrate for plant photosynthesis, is in the focus of interest as the ambiguous effect of its increasing concentration is controversially discussed. Is its increase beneficial for plants or are plants non-responsive? NOx, a product of combustion and lightning, can have either fertilizing or toxic effects depending on the concentration and form. This is also the case for reduced forms of nitrogen (NHy), which are mostly emitted from agricultural and industrial activities. In combination CO2 and N compounds can have a fertilizing effect. SO2 and ground-level O3 are mostly phytotoxic, depending on their concentrations, daily and seasonal exposure dynamics, and tree health condition. Elevated concentrations of both substances arise from industrial combustion processes and car emissions. All of the above-mentioned gaseous compounds affect plant metabolism in their specific ways and to different degrees. This impacts the isotope fractionation leaving specific fingerprints in the C, O, (H) and N isotope ratios of organic matter. In this chapter we will show how the impact of increasing CO2 and air pollutants are reflected in the isotopic ratios of tree rings. Increasing CO2 shows a considerable variation in responses of δ13C and to a minor degree in δ18O. Ozone and SO2 exposure cause an overall increase of the δ13C values in tree rings and a slight decrease in δ18O, mimicking an increase in net photosynthesis (AN) and to a minor degree in stomatal conductance (gs). However, directly measured AN and gs values show the opposite, which does not always correspond with the isotope derived gas exchange data. NO2 concentration as it is found near highly frequented freeways or industrial plants causes an increase of δ13C while δ18O decreases. This indicates an increase in both AN and gs, which corresponds well with directly measured gas exchange data. Thus the air quality situation must be taken in consideration for the interpretation of isotope values in tree rings.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Stable C and O isotope ratios are indicative for changes at the leaf level CO2 and H2O exchange (Chap. 9; Farquhar et al. 1989; Chap. 10; Farquhar and Lloyd 1993). Via assimilates, the specific isotope signals are stored in tree rings making them an ideal recorder for information on past environmental changes. The goal of this chapter is to highlight the impact of changes in atmospheric CO2 and air pollutants on stable isotope ratios in tree rings. Herein, we describe the pathways by which gaseous compounds are incorporated into plants with an emphasis on uptake via leaves through stomata. Impacts on tree physiology and potential phytotoxicity are discussed with respect to effects on isotopic fractionation that can lead to detectable isotopic variation in tree-rings. Overall, this chapter provides a broad review of the literature that demonstrates the effect of CO2 and pollutants on tree-ring isotopes and how these influences need to be considered for the interpretation of stable isotopes in tree rings.
1.1 Reactive Pollutants and Trees
Reactive gaseous compounds, such as O3, SO2 and NOx, which are mainly products of high temperature combustion processes (e.g., ore smelters, oil refineries, chemical industrial plants, coal-fired power plants, and combustion driven mobility) were identified early on as the most relevant phytotoxic air pollutants (Ashmore 2005; Wellburn 1990; Martin and Sutherland 1990; Frank et al. 1979, Choi and Lee 2012). Over recent decades, SO2 emissions have been substantially reduced through air quality regulations in most Western countries. Such a decrease for airborne N compounds is observed since the mid 1980s, with the introduction of catalyzers for car exhausts (Geng et al. 2014; Etzold et al. 2020). While a fraction of the N- and S-compounds are deposited on the soil surface and absorbed by microorganisms and roots (their ambiguous effects are described below), the gaseous forms are taken up via stomata through diffusional processes and directly metabolized. Before stomatal uptake, a portion of the reactive pollutant species are deposited on branch, leaf and soil surfaces (Fig. 24.1), which makes the quantification of leaf uptake rather difficult. Where possible, isotopic tracer studies (15N, 34S) in the field (Ammann et al. 1999, Saurer et al. 2004) and in the laboratory (Chaparro-Suarez et al. 2011; Vallano and Sparks 2013) can lead to more realistic flux estimates including eddy covariance measurements. A broad overview about the impact of air pollutants on physiological responses as reflected in stable isotopes is given in Savard (2010).
In the 1970’s and later, increasing concentrations of air pollutants were causing significant losses in agricultural crop yields and were regionally identified as causing significant forest decline (McLaughlin 1985; Heck et al. 1988; Slovik et al. 1996; Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996; Muzika et al. (2004); Ashmore 2005; Matyssek et al. 2010, 2012). Climatic variation in combination with air pollutants can exacerbate the impact of stress modulating canopy-integrated leaf gas exchange, and thus tree growth. Indeed, one of the most toxic pollutants besides SO2 (Darral 1989; Lee et al. 2017) is O3 (Cailleret et al. 2018; Jolivet et al. 2016). Whereas SO2 pollution is not as globally distributed as tropospheric O3, and is mainly a regional problem near the vicinity of smelters and coal driven energy production, ozone has greater areal coverage as well as more spatial and temporal variation (Lefohn et al. 2018; Mills et al. 2018; Tarasick et al. 2019). In particular, photochemical reactions producing O3 are enhanced during warm and sunny days when nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds are present (Royal Society 2008). Weather situations favoring ozone formation are often associated with dry and warm conditions that lead to low stomatal conductance (gs) or stomatal closure, which reduces uptake and hence toxic dose effects. Thus, less injury will occur when stomata are closed even if O3 or SO2 concentrations are high. In contrast, conditions characterized by high air pollution concentrations and high gs occur when the air is humid leading to higher uptake, which will exacerbate the effects of these pollutants (Jolivet et al. 2016). These include sluggish stomata and lower gs. Sluggish stomata become unresponsive to sudden changes in environmental cues that affect stomatal aperture, such as light or humidity or even pollution levels. Generally, plants respond to the exposure of air pollutants and CO2 with changes in gs, net photosynthesis (AN), and biochemical processes (e.g., Savard et al. 2020a), which reflect how O3 and SO2 can directly damage cells via oxidation of lipids in the plasma membrane (Jolivet et al. 2016; Duan et al. 2019) and impairment of other plant biochemical processes (decrease in Rubisco and potential increase in PEP carboxylase. Ainsworth et al. 2012).
While O3 and SO2 are predominantly phytotoxic, N compounds can be either beneficial or detrimental (Etzold et al. 2020), depending on their concentration and form. The ultimate impact of N can be dependent on its availability in the ecosystem. In N-limited forests, N deposition modifies the soil biogeochemical dynamics and can increase tree growth (Högberg 2007; Thomas et al. 2015), whereas in high N- systems, additional N-deposition can lead to soil acidification, and excessive foliar and root N, which can foster tree mortality (Aber et al. 1989; Vitousek et al. 1997; Galloway et al. 2004). The combined increase in CO2 and N-deposition can often enhance C uptake and can result in an enhanced tree and forest growth (Norby 1998; Gruber and Galloway 2008; Etzold et al. 2020). However, where stem growth was either reduced or unchanged, access to nutrients was found to be restricted or the air contained other pollutants that were potentially phytotoxic (Giguère-Croteau et al. 2019; Savard et al. 2020a).
Air pollutants generally cause direct damages on the cell wall structure and impair biochemical processes (Jolivet et al. 2016), while CO2 and N-compounds can be beneficial through various pathways, from the roots to the mesophyll (Fowler et al. 1998; 2001) (Fig. 24.1).
1.2 General Effects of Changes in the Atmosphere on Stable C, O and N Isotope Ratios
As shown in Chapters 9, 10 and 19 any environmental impact that alters the source isotopic signals or the foliar gas exchange of CO2 and H2O will result in specific changes of the stable C and O isotope ratios (δ13C and δ18O values) in plant organic matter. An increase in CO2 concentration enhances photosynthesis and can cause a reduction in gs. However, exposure to pollutants such as O3 and SO2 also induces stomatal closure, but in contrast is often accompanied by a concomitant decrease in net photosynthesis (AN) (Matyssek et al. 1997; Linzon 1972; Ziegler 1972; Parry and Gutteridge 1984; Martin et al. 1988; Wedler et al. 1995). Exposure to NOx sometimes leads to an increase in both AN and gs (Gessler et al. 2000; Siegwolf et al. 2001). Changes in AN and gs alter the ratio of internal (leaf intercellular) [CO2] (ci) to external [CO2] (ca), i.e., ci/ca. When AN increases without a change in gs, ci/ca decreases. Since 12CO2 is preferably assimilated relative to 13CO2 the partial pressure of 12CO2 decreases to a larger proportion than 13CO2 augmenting the ratio of 13CO2 / 12CO2 in the favor of 13C. As a consequence the uptake of 13CO2 rises, resulting in an increase of the δ13C values. Under conditions where there is an increase in gs at a constant AN, or a decrease in AN at a constant gs, the ci/ca will increase, leading to a decrease in δ13C values (Farquhar et al. 1989; Chap. 9). Chapter 10 describes the formation of δ18O values in plant organic matter, which is given by the δ18O ratio of source water (water before it enters the leaves, see Chaps. 10 and 18) and subsequently by the δ18O of leaf water, which is modified by the variability of gs and water vapor in the air. The role of gs is reflected in an inverse proportional relationship to δ18O values (an increase in gs results in a decrease in δ18O and vice versa, Barbour et al. 2004; see also Chap. 10). As the 18O/16O ratio is independent of AN, the combination of δ13C and δ18O from the same sample allows for the distinction of whether δ13C changes are a result of changes in AN or gs (Scheidegger et al. 2000). Here the application of the C and O dual isotope approach can be very useful for data interpretation (Chap. 16) and facilitates a more detailed analysis of the physiological plant responses to variable impacts of air pollutants, assuming that only intrinsic reactions (i.e., non-responsive to air pollutants) control the foliar isotopic signals. The specific isotopic ratio, formed in the leaves and imprinted on assimilates, are then transferred to stems (tree rings) and roots forming organic material (see Chap. 13).
Next we discuss the specific impact of gaseous N compounds taken up via stomata. Chapter 12 (δ15N values) and 23 (fertilization effects) provide a general discussion about N-absorption via roots and leaves. Various quantities for stomatal uptake of N compounds are provided in literature, i.e. values up to 30% of the total plant N uptake (Amman et al. 1999). In most cases, the N isotopic (δ15N) signature of the gaseous forms is reflected in the foliar organic matter (amino acids) and the N isotopic fractionation is low. However, the δ15N values of soil N compounds can depart largely from what is assimilated by the roots (see Chap. 12). An overview on the various N-fractionations during N incorporation in leaves is given in Tcherkez (2011) and Craine et al. (2015).
As the nitrogen content in tree rings is low and varies (on average 0.04–0.12%), the isotopic analysis of δ15N values in wood is quite challenging (Savard et al. 2020b). Where possible, the analysis should be done on single rings. In cases with very little material, samples can be pooled. Another challenge is the mobility of N compounds across several rings (Tomlinson et al. 2014). Yet numerous studies have made use of the δ15N values in tree rings and of the atmospheric sources to calculate the N incorporation of specific anthropogenic sources that have an isotopic signature distinct from natural δ15N values (Elhani et al. 2003; Amman et al. 1999; Saurer et al. 2004, Guerrieri et al. 2009, see below).
2 Sampling, Sample Preparation, Isotope Analysis and Flux Determination of Gaseous Pollutants
2.1 Sample Processing
In the following, we refer to Chaps. 4, 5 and 12 with regard to sampling and sample preparation. For the analysis of δ15N values in tree rings, whole wood is collected and milled the same way as for the 13C and 18O analyses. However, procedures for sample preparation to determine the 15N/14N ratio in wood are still under debate, in particular, the question of whether the mobile fraction of N compounds in tree rings should be removed. While some authors recommend removal to prevent false trends, other studies have shown no effect on the N concentration and δ15N values (Doucet et al. 2011; Tomlinson et al. 2014; Guerrieri et al. 2017; Chap. 12 for more details). Once the samples are ready for analysis, they are combusted in an elemental analyzer (analogous to the determination of δ13C), which is linked via an open split interface with a sector isotope ratio mass spectrometer to determine the C or N isotope ratios. A recent evaluation of the methodology for preparing spruce tree-ring δ15N series for the purpose of conducting environmental research used a total of 16 trees from two sites exposed to different types and levels of anthropogenic N emissions (Savard et al. 2020b). This study suggested that short-term δ15N changes (<7 years) are difficult to relate to long term environmental impacts, but that middle to long-term trends do. The authors also suggest that pooling tree rings of several trees from a site can provide reliable results provided that the sub-samples are of equal weight, but that the ideal method is to calculate the arithmetic mean of δ15N series from a minimum of three individual trees.
For δ18O determination samples are thermally decomposed in a helium stream under exclusion of oxygen (pyrolysis). The resulting CO is analyzed in the mass spectrometer (Farquhar et al. 1997; Woodley et al. 2012, Weigt et al. 2015).
2.2 Foliar Flux Quantification of Pollutants
Flux quantification of gaseous pollutants from the atmosphere into the leaf intercellular spaces follows the same principle as for CO2 and H2O gas exchange (Gessler et al. 2000; Siegwolf et al. 2001, Teklemariam and Sparks 2004). The pollutant fluxes are calculated by mutliplying gs with the gaseous pollutant concentration difference between the ambient ([O3a]) and intercellular ([O3i]) for the respective gas molecule. The latter is mostly assumed to be zero (Gessler et al. 2000, 2002; Laisk et al. 1989) or where available, values from the literature are used (Yamulki et al. 1996; Thoene et al. 1996; Rennenberg and Geßler 1999). The stomatal conductance is either determined using gas exchange systems or derived from sap flux measurements (Köstner et al. 1996; Zweifel et al. 2007) or meteorological approaches (eddy covariance or energy balance, Wehr et al. 2017). A direct approach to determine gaseous pollutant uptake uses gas exchange chambers, where the pollutant concentration before and after the chamber is measured and the difference is multiplied with the gas flux though the chamber system (Neubert et al. 1993; Teklemariam and Sparks 2004; Grulke et al. 2005, 2007; Chaparro-Suarez et al. 2011). This approach is mostly applied in laboratory experiments or when leaves or twigs can be enclosed in cuvettes. In addition, the use of enriched labeled gases, e.g., 15NH3, 15NO2 or 34SO2 is an elegant and reliable method as the assimilated substance can be traced and quantified within the plants (Nussbaum et al. 1993; Segschneider et al. 1995; Vallano and Sparks 2007). In close vicinity of emission sources, the isotopic values of the pollutants are often different from the natural background values, e.g., heavily frequented roads (Amman et al. 1999; Saurer et al. 2004; Guerrieri et al. 2009) or industry plants (Guerrieri et al. 2009; Savard 2010; Savard et al. 2017) vs. clean air regions.
All these methods have their pros and cons. The most prominent disadvantage is that the accurate quantification of the pollutant fluxes is very challenging, since O3 or NOx as well as NHy react with the surfaces of the leaf environment (i.e., the canopy, adjacent branches and leaf surfaces) and the instrument itself (walls of the tubing and measuring equipment resulting in a gas phase destruction), which can lead to an over-estimation of the real fluxes into the leaves.
3 Specific Impacts of Gaseous Compounds on Isotopic Ratios in Tree Rings
3.1 Increasing Atmospheric CO2 Concentration
As atmospheric CO2 is the primary C-source for terrestrial plants, its variations in concentration and δ13C values impact the isotopic ratios in organic matter via CO2 and H2O gas exchange. Since the initial stages of industrialization around 1850 the CO2 concentration has increased from ~ 270 µmol/mol to 415 µmol/mol by 2020 (Belmecheri and Lavergne 2020). This 145 µmol/mol increase in ca can have strong impacts on various aspects of plant physiology and lead to higher ci as CO2 diffuses through stomata and into leaves. During much of the last 20,000 years, long time periods have corresponded to increasing CO2 (ca). For plant carbon uptake, these increases in ca caused increases in the difference of ca−ci as a consequence of an enhanced CO2 fixation into sugars within the leaf by photosynthesis, but this also caused ci to increase in absolute concentrations. Following Fick’s Law, the increasing difference of ca−ci is directly proportional to the stimulation of AN, assuming gs stays constant (Farquhar et al. 1989):
The same relationship can be re-written as:
The term ci/ca in Eq. (24.2) is particularly important to understanding how CO2 may affect tree-ring carbon isotope signatures because Farquhar et al. (1989) further showed that carbon isotope discrimination (Δ13C, see Chaps. 9 and 17 for details) can be described by:
where a is the fractionation from diffusion through the stomata (4.4‰) and b is the fractionation by carboxylation by Rubisco (~27‰).
Equations 24.1–24.3 summarize the simplest version of a much more complex relationship provided by Farquhar et al. (1989) and these have been employed a large number of studies of terrestrial, marine and atmospheric carbon isotope signatures. However, reconsiderations of this approach have increasingly advocated modifying Eq. 24.3 as:
where f is the fractionation factor during photorespiration (‰) and Γ* is the CO2 compensation point in the absence of CO2 (Seibt et al. 2008; Keeling et al. 2017; Schubert and Jahren 2018; Lavergne et al. 2019).
The goal of this section is not to delve too deeply into the plant physiology and isotopic theory, and applications to Earth systems modeling, which many other papers have addressed within the past 10 years. Moreover, variation in mesophyll conductance is known to have a substantial effect on Δ13C values, but it will not be discussed in this chapter due to the great variation among species and a lack of consensus on the magnitude with which changing atmospheric CO2 can affect this aspect of leaf gas exchange. Rather, this section serves to set the stage for understanding what CO2-induced trends we should expect to observe in tree-ring Δ13C signatures, which is a function of ci/ca and f and Γ*, which in turn are directly related to intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE; see Chap. 17). Whether CO2 may affect Δ13C values is a long-running and important question to dendrochronologists, plant physiologists, paleoecologists, and a broad array of scientists that use atmospheric δ13C or Δ13C as a tracer of past global-scale changes to climate and vegetation patterns. Therefore, relevant information for interpreting tree-ring isotope patterns has arisen in diverse fields of scientific inquiry that we will briefly summarize here.
The least intrusive and most realistic way to expose vegetation to elevated CO2 (eCO2) is to use chamberless exposure systems, also known as FACE systems (Free Air CO2 Exposure). FACE studies undertaken in forests are logistically difficult and operationally expensive, so only a handful of these experiments have been undertaken or are still operating (Bader et al. 2013; Norby et al. 2016). Overall, these and other eCO2 experiments have generally confirmed an expected fertilizing effect on AN; whereas the expected reductions in gs have often been absent or smaller than expected on mature trees (Körner et al. 2005; Bader et al. 2013; Keel et al. 2007, Streit et al. 2014; Klein et al. 2016; Gimeno et al. 2020; Jiang et al. 2020; Walker et al. 2020). In forest settings, gs responses to eCO2 tend to be a function of various other biological, physical and ecological factors mediating tree- or canopy-level whereas potted plants in the lab or in controlled environments show a strong responsiveness to changes in CO2 (Jarvis and McNaughton 1986; Buckley et al. 2017; Sperry et al. 2019). Hence, if trees growing in natural environments respond similarly to what has been documented experimentally, with historical increases in AN and little to no change in gs (sensu Wieser et al. 2018), then we should expect that trees and forests should become more water-use efficient. Indeed, most tree-ring carbon isotope studies that focus on this issue have documented this shift in water-use efficiency. Most of these hundreds of studies have been recently digitized and summarized by Adams et al. (2020), confirming in a massive meta-analysis what has been demonstrated by a previous and somewhat smaller meta-analysis (Leonardi et al. 2012). Such increases in WUE can, but do not stringently demand, changes in Δ13C or ci/ca. Saurer et al. (2004) first noted how tree-ring carbon isotope records spanning 1861–1990 documented no change or moderate decreases in Δ13C or ci/ca despite substantial gains in iWUE. Since then, research interests have focused on whether CO2 modifies Δ13C or ci/ca, because such knowledge could provide for more accurate determination of the magnitude with which Δ13C has responded to climate or other environmental variability from isotope signals in tree-rings and other plant and paleoecological or geological records.
As CO2 increases it is often assumed that Δ13C or the ci/ca ratio remains constant. However, numerous studies show considerable variations in the isotopic responses (Fig. 24.2), which is either species specific or due to habitat properties or changes in the environment. Variations in isotopic response patterns as described by Saurer et al (2004) can even occur within the same tree during its life span (Wieser et al. 2018). To assess the potential impact of ca on leaf gas exchange, a review of theory and modeling combined with estimates of past ca and stomatal measurements over geological times concluded that plants maintain a constant ci/ca (Franks et al. 2013). Yet, tree-ring Δ13C records tended to indicate that Δ13C changed in response to increasing ca, suggesting a correction to ci/ca or some other combination of factors not explicitly considered by previous tree-ring isotopes studies (i.e., f, Γ*, or mesophyll conductance) may be needed to accurately separate this effect from that of climate variability on tree-ring Δ13C values. However, before a set of mechanisms can be identified, it is first important to identify the magnitude of change. Based on tree-ring Δ13C data from four trees, Feng and Epstein (1995) first proposed a correction to Δ13C of 0.02‰/ppm CO2. Soon after Kurschner (1996) proposed a rate of 0.0073‰/ppm CO2 from a single eCO2 experiment. Using an 1171-year record from a single species and region, Treydte et al. (2009) concluded that a shift of 0.012‰/ppm CO2 best fit their data. An over two-fold range of responses among these individual studies clearly demonstrated that a synthesis effort was necessary to determine an overall response, and whether or not a large empirical assessment to determine whether ci/ca responds to ca as indicated by tree-ring Δ13C or with the contention of Franks et al. (2013) that ci/ca does not respond to ca. To do so, Δ13C responses to CO2 from many paleo and eCO2 studies and including all FACE studies that had been conducted in forests up to that time (Voelker et al. 2016; hereafter V16). The three earlier individual studies reporting changes in Δ13C/ppm CO2 describe linear rates of change whereas the V16 data set and analyses predicted that ci/ca should increase with ca but at a non-linear or diminishing rate as:
In turn, Eq. (24.5), can be translated to a non-linear change in Δ13C per unit CO2 as:
The negative exponential relationship given in Eq. (24.6) is plotted in Fig. 24.2 and clearly expands ca values far lower and higher than all tree-ring studies. This relationship likely represented the most robust empirical assessment at that time. However, the intervening five years have provided a number of other relevant studies that can shed additional light on whether Eq. (24.6) is supported or refuted by independent analyses, and how trends in tree-ring Δ13C studies should be viewed in light of this body of work. As an example, Lavergne et al. (2019) analyzed > 100 tree-ring Δ13C studies constrained to the period 1950–2014. They found little detectable effect of ca, converted pressure units on Δ13C after accounting for immense changes in climate and elevation among studies sites and over time. Ostensibly, this agrees qualitatively with the theory reviewed by Franks et al. (2013). However, the data set investigated by Lavergne et al. (2019) co-varied with a period of recent rapid climate change at many sites and spanned a relatively small gradient in ca compared to some other studies, which would make it less likely to detect a response of Δ13C to ca.
The Δ13C / ppm CO2 response rate of the two paleo studies of conifer leaves or wood (Hare et al. 2018) and speleothems (Breeker 2017) both overlapped with that predicted by Eq. (24.6), which provided evidence of a consistent Δ13C / ppm CO2 response rate prior to industrialization despite different data types and analytical approaches. Thereafter, Schubert and Jahren (2018) assessed Δ13C / ppm CO2 across ca of ca. 100 to 3000 ppm for Arabidopsis thaliana, grown in chambers. The model of change in Δ13C per ppm CO2 resulting from this meta-analysis was given as:
where Γ* was set to 40 ppm (Schubert and Jahren 2018).
When we re-applied this model to the sparse data compilation of woody plant responses to CO2 provided in Schubert and Jahren (2018) (i.e., excluding the data of herbaceous plants grown in growth chambers), the response was nearly parallel to Eq. (24.5) but shifted substantially higher (Fig. 24.2, dark green line). Notably, the model described about 11% of the variation in Δ13C / ppm CO2 whereas an empirical fit to the same data explained 11% of the variation and had a muted response at lower CO2 concentrations. The value of f = 38.6‰ was found to maximize explained variation between the model and data. The value of 38.6 ‰ is substantially higher than the range of 9.1 to 22.0 ‰ that has been reported previously (Schubert andJahren 2018). These results suggest that their woody plant data set was not large enough for robust parameter estimation. To remedy this problem, we plotted Eq. (24.7) fitted to the much larger V16 data set (Fig. 24.2, thin brown line), which yielded a value of f = 19.4‰, which is at the high end of the previously reported range, but much more reasonable compared to f = 38.6‰. Overall, this analysis provides powerful independent confirmation of the shape and magnitude of the Δ13C response to CO2 despite two very different analytical approaches. More specifically, V16 attributed CO2-induced changes to Δ13C entirely to shifts in ci/ca, whereas Shubert and Jahren (2018) attributed the same changes entirely to fractionation associated with photorespiration. It is certainly possible that some combination of these two primary mechanisms, other morphological and biochemical contributing factors, as well as ecological and evolutionary feedbacks operating on long timescales, determine the overall Δ13C response to CO2 over long time periods.
The measured record of 13CO2 in the atmosphere provides yet another means for understanding how terrestrial Δ13C of the vegetation has been influenced by rising CO2. When global models of ocean and terrestrial productivity and carbon cycling are constrained to match 13CO2 records, the results required that Δ13C increase over the industrial period (Keeling et al. 2017). Although the positive value of this response rate of Δ13C / ppm CO2 obtained by Keeling et al. (2017) is in broad agreement with many other studies (as noted in Fig. 24.2), it was substantially higher compared to most tree-ring Δ13C responses and meta-analyses for that same range in atmospheric CO2. The apparent difference in the Δ13C / ppm CO2 response rate between the ones reported by Keeling et al. (2017) and that plotted by using Eqs. (24.6) or (24.7) as applied to the V16 data set has most likely multiple, non-exclusive causes as detailed below. The difference may reflect (1) the difference between using woody plant Δ13C responses largely from temperate species as compared to global vegetation responses where C4 grasses and other vegetation types play a significant role (2) the lack of a temperature response of Γ* being incorporated in the analyses of Eqs. (24.6) and (24.7) applied to the V16 data set, and (3) deficiencies in the global modeling approach of Keeling et al. (2017). With respect to point (1), reconciliation of the difference would require that C4 plants and tropical forests, the vegetation types most conspicuously lacking from paleo and tree-ring Δ13C data sets, be characterized by stronger responses of Δ13C to rising CO2 concentrations. The Δ values of C4 plants are lower and far less sensitive to changes in CO2 compared to C3 plants, so the source of increased Δ13C responses to CO2 would need an origin in tropical forests. This makes intuitive sense since C3 net photosynthesis includes more dynamic responses to CO2 at higher average temperatures characterizing tropical forests. Tropical rainforests would also have fewer and less severe moisture constraints, allowing greater sensitivity to CO2 compared to many temperate forests. With respect to point (2), the incorporation of a temperature response of Γ* was not attempted because surface air temperatures are poorly constrained for paleo data collections spanning the Holocene and Last Glacial period. V16 did attempt to provide modern locations with similar climate conditions compared to the paleo data collections. The implicit assumption therein is that differences in temperature and Γ* would add noise to the data set but be unbiased. That analysis also eliminated the Δ13C difference between paleo and CO2-enrichment studies at the approximate breakpoint between the two types of data sets at ca. 350 ppm that could have owed to differences in species composition, climates and the temperature dependence of Γ*. With respect to point (3), the findings of the simulation modeling by Keeling et al. (2017) spanned the years 1765–2014 and concluded that Δ13C of terrestrial vegetation must have changed significantly, and attributed this change to a steady increase in Δ13C of 0.014‰ / ppm CO2. Although this change was attributed to the effects of atmospheric CO2, this period encompassed increasingly widespread disturbance to forests at a global scale, which certainly decreased vegetation height and competition for soil water, which would have contributed to progressive reductions in globally integrated terrestrial Δ13C over this time period. Hence, other potential sources of bias outside of direct CO2-effects on leaf gas exchange influenced 13CO2 records and could have been mistakenly been attributed to impacts of rising atmospheric CO2 on vegetation Δ13C by Keeling et al. (2017). Overall, the reconciliation of results provided here indicates that the Δ13C response to CO2 in woody plants will generally be expected to follow either Eqs. (24.5) or (24.6) when parameterized with values of Γ* = 40 ppm and f = 19.4‰, but that the overall Δ13C response to CO2 of global vegetation may be somewhat greater in magnitude according to the findings of Keeling et al. (2017), unless this attribution to CO2 was biased by not including the effects of progressively greater disturbance on forest leaf gas exchange.
A number of readers of this text may be wondering what, in practice, should be done about expected increases in Δ13C in response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. This topic is difficult to address because there is no one correct answer. An important aspect in assessing apparent Δ13C / ppm CO2 trends at any given site or across sites is that there can be tremendous variation among individual tree-ring studies, as represented by the numerous narrow black lines displayed in Fig. 24.2. This site-to-site variability results from many interacting factors such as climate change, climate oscillations, tree development (i.e., increased tree height or stature), competition, pollution and other stressors that are superimposed on top of the relatively small effects of CO2. Indeed, Leonardi et al. (2012) summarized a large number of tree-ring Δ13C studies and found a huge shift in responses between the periods 1860 and 1990 that included negative overall responses of Δ13C / ppm CO2 during the 1952–1990 period (Fig. 24.2). Such a negative Δ13C response to CO2 is probably not realistic based on first principles. At sites with low productivity there may be little to no response of Δ13C to CO2 (Marchand et al. 2020) whereas in other regions, negative Δ13C trends have been associated with increased stomatal closure associated with warming- or competition-induced drought stress (Peñuelas et al. 2011; Saurer et al. 2014; Lévesque et al. 2014; Frank et al. 2015; Voelker et al. 2019). Indeed, some studies have utilized approaches that have determined differences from the expected trend in Δ13C / ppm CO2 across a range of sites (Liu et al. 2018; Szejner et al. 2018; Voelker et al. 2019). The approach of these three papers was to remove the expected CO2 responses with an aim of better isolating the impacts of changing climate or competition on ecophysiology. This approach may prove particularly useful for isolating spatio-temporal impacts of climate and climate change and other factors such as pollution that affect tree-ring carbon isotope signatures if future efforts adjust for the temperature dependence of Γ* and the partial pressures of CO2 that differ with elevation (sensu Lavergne et al. 2019).
δ18O: In experiments with potted young trees, increases in CO2 resulted in a distinct reduction of gs. However, in some FACE experiments in temperate mixed forest little (Keel et al. 2007) or no stomatal response to changes in CO2 was found (Bader et al. 2010, 2013; Klein et al. 2016). Even after 9 years of FACE treatment trees growing at the timberline at 2180 m above sea level (Stillberg, Davos, Switzerland) showed no stomatal response to increased CO2 for either species, Larix decidua and Pinus mugo. Accordingly, the effect of eCO2 was not reflected in δ18O values of organic matter, although gs of the same plants was highly responsive to changes in VPD, which was clearly reflected in δ18O (Streit et al. 2014). As noted above, site-specific biological, physical and ecological factors cause tree- or canopy-level effects to be diminished compared to leaf-level responses to CO2. So far, δ18O data of trees and tree rings from FACE experiments are rare. Before we derive CO2 responses via stomata reflected in δ18O values from tree rings we must keep in mind that the oxygen isotope composition is modulated by a number of other factors, such as origin of precipitation water (Dansgaard 1953, 1964, Chap. 18), seasonality (Daansgard 1964; Rozanski et al. 1993) air humidity and δ18O of water vapor (Dongmann et al. 1974; Roden et al. 2005; Lehmann et al. 2018) soil properties and soil depth (Sprenger et al. 2018; Brooks et al. 2010). Voelker and Meinzer (2017) summarize further that post photosynthetic fractionation processes alter the δ18O values in wood during the transfer of assimilates in the phloem: an oxygen exchange occurs with 18O-depleted xylem water, modifying the δ18O of the assimilates (Roden and Ehleringer 1999; Barbour et al. 2004) especially during the synthesis of cellulose (Sternberg 2009, Gessler et al. 2014, Chap. 10). The variability of these processes can add signal noise, masking stomatal signals imprinted on the δ18O of tree rings to a degree that the stomatal signal is no longer detectable. This is especially the case if the modification of the oxygen isotope ratio by gs is small (e.g. at high air humidity; Roden et al. 2005), resulting in an unfavorable signal to “noise” ratio. Nevertheless, we cannot conclude that changes in CO2 have no effect on δ18O, as other studies for other species have found different responses (Battipaglia et al. 2013).
Albeit the reduced responsiveness of gs to CO2 in the field, using both, C and O isotope values widens the scope of interpretation; even more so if the δ18O of the source water and water vapor are known. The latter can also be estimated with specific models (Barbour et al. 2001). The application of various statistical tools or the dual isotope approach as described in Chap. 16 is valuable to evaluate the impact of long-term CO2 dynamics on plant physiology, especially for the evaluation of the long-term intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE, see Chap. 17). Including tree-ring width and anatomical parameters (cell wall thickness, wood density, etc. see Sidorova et al. 2019) will help to identify, which factors impact tree growth and to what degree besides increasing [CO2]. Such an enhanced data set is instrumental to correctly evaluate the carbon gain water loss relationship (see Chaps. 16 and 17).
To summarize: the wide variety in isotopic patterns in response to CO2 changes reflects the dynamic variability of species-specific responses to elevated CO2. This includes (a) stimulation of AN under high CO2 levels (e.g., Herrick and Thomas 2001; Bader et al. 2010; Klein et al. 2016), (b) down regulation of photosynthesis (Sage et al. 1989; Grams et al. 2007), (c) reduction in stomatal conductance (Gunderson et al. 2002), or (d) little (Keel et al. 2007; Bader et al. 2010) to no stomatal response to changes in CO2 (Bader et al. 2013; Streit et al. 2014; Klein et al. 2016). These short-term responses on the leaf level leave their isotopic fingerprints in the assimilates, which are cumulated and integrated over the growth period and recorded in the biomass of tree ring (Chap. 14).
3.2 Ozone (O3)
Ozone in the troposphere is considered to be one of the most phytotoxic air pollutants, impacting plant and ecosystem functions (Ashmore 2005; Ainsworth et al. 2012). A good description of its formation, propagation and fate is given in the report of the Royal Society (2008). The main process of O3 removal from the troposphere is the dry deposition on land surfaces, with an important role for vegetation such as forest ecosystems by O3 uptake through stomata (Cieslik 2004). Non-stomatal removal of O3 occurs at soil and plant surfaces (e.g. cuticle deposition) and degradation reactions with soil or plant emitted NOx or biogenic VOCs (Lenhart et al. 2019; Fowler et al. 1998, 2001). These removal mechanisms complicate the quantification of the O3 uptake via stomata; nevertheless, significant estimates of non-stomatal O3 fluxes were reported (20–80%, Cieslik 2009; 26–44%, Rannik et al. 2012), depending on the type of vegetation cover and its surface characteristics. Albeit these uncertainties, flux estimates based on the combination of stomatal conductance and ozone concentration still yield important results (Karlsson et al. 2004, 2007; Grünhage et al. 2004) for the ozone dose effective on plant physiology. More sophisticated models aim at linking stomatal O3 uptake to growth decline for a more mechanistic ozone risk assessment to forests (Matyssek et al. 2008, Anav et al. 2016, Feng et al. 2018, for crop plants, Hu et al. 2015, Xu et al. 2018).
3.2.1 Damages Caused by Ozone
Once O3 has been taken up by the plants via the stomata it may cause numerous visible leaf injuries such as chlorosis and necroses, accelerated senescence and pre-mature leaf shedding (Günthardt-Goerg and Vollenweider 2007). Even before these symptoms become visible, a number of responses at the cellular and molecular level have already occurred. Upon uptake, O3 rapidly reacts with wet surfaces in the intercellular cavity, producing a suite of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that challenge a plant’s detoxification mechanisms. Quite similar to defense reactions against pathogens and programmed cell death (for details see Kangasjarvi et al. 2005, Sandermann et al. 1998), the plant amplifies internal ROS production that cause the above-mentioned leaf symptoms in what is known as the hypersensitive response reaction. In the long run and often before visible symptoms develop, or even without them, stomatal functioning and Rubisco activity are affected by chronic O3 stress. The stomatal response is not the same among species and O3 concentrations. While short-term exposure to high concentrations typically result in a direct closing response of stomata, long-term exposure to moderately enhanced O3 levels is also reported to reduce gs (Hoshika et al. 2014, 2015; Wittig et al. 2007), and related to declining rates of CO2 fixation by lower Rubisco protein amount and activity (Karnosky et al. 2005; Wittig et al. 2009; Dizengremel 2001). Other reports, however, describe impaired stomatal functioning by elevated O3, causing delayed responses of stomata to environmental changes. This so called “stomatal sluggishness” increases response times of opening and closing movements, which can lead to increased water loss by transpiration under high VPD, respectively (Paoletti and Grulke 2010; Paoletti et al. (2020). At the whole tree level, elevated O3 affects allocation processes of photoassimilates. In mature trees, long-term exposure to twice ambient O3 concentrations significantly reduced allocation to stems (Ritter et al. 2011), which is well in line with the often-found reduction of stem growth in natural environments with high O3 exposure (Karnosky et al. 2005). Below ground, O3 impaired source-sink relations are believed to reduce belowground C allocation (reviewed by Andersen 2003, Andersen et al. 2010), typically resulting in lower root/shoot biomass ratios. However, a larger number of studies report on unchanged root/shoot biomass ratios (Agathokleous et al. 2016) and few experiments on field grown trees under long-term O3 exposure even found fine root growth to be stimulated (Nikolova et al 2010; Pregitzer et al. 2008).
3.2.2 Consequences for Isotopic Fractionations
Since O3 impairs stomatal regulation, photosynthesis and its biochemical processes, these impacts will be seen in the carbon and oxygen isotopic fractionations and thus in the variation of the 13C/12C and 18O/16O isotope ratios of different plant compartments. Species respond differently to elevated O3 depending on O3 uptake, mesophyll exposure, detoxification capacity, and plant age (Fuhrer and Booker 2003; Matyssek and Sandermann 2003).
In a 2-year phytotron study on juvenile Fagus sylvatica trees exposed to elevated O3, a parallel increase of δ13C and δ18O was observed (Grams et al. 2007; Grams and Matyssek 2010), indicating a concurrent reduction of ci as a response to stomatal closure. Likewise for mature trees of the same species, O3 caused reductions in gs and related increases in δ18O (Kitao et al. 2009; Gessler et al. 2009) as well as for different herbaceous plants (Jäggi and Fuhrer 2007). In accordance with reductions of gs, the phytotron study found AN to be reduced as often observed under elevated O3 (Ainsworth et al. 2012) and not increased as one might have expected from higher δ13C values. Moreover, the increase in δ13C under O3 compared to control trees was stronger than expected from measured ci and corresponding calculations using the Farquhar model (Kozovits et al. 2005; Grams et al. 2007). This apparent mismatch between gas-exchange measurements and carbon isotope discrimination was also reported by Saurer et al (1991) for grain (Triticum aestivum), Patterson and Rundel (1993) for Pinus jeffreyi and by Elsik et al. (1993) for two Pinus species. Later studies found PEPC (Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase) to be increased in amount and activity under O3 exposure, resulting in increased δ13C values for both leaves and stems (Saurer et al. 1995; Doubnerová and Ryslavá 2011). Regardless of the higher PEPC activity, AN was reduced and gs showed little response compared to control plants. The increased δ13C values were explained by the fact that C-fixation through PEPC does not discriminate as much against 13C compared to 12C resulting in an13C enrichment in the assimilates (Vogel 1993). Various detoxification mechanisms further the 13C enrichment along with an enhanced PEPC activity that are generally stimulated under stress (Doubnerová and Ryslavá 2011). An increase in δ13C under O3 exposure, which would suggest an enhanced or constant AN at reduced gs is not in line with our understanding of 13C fractionation coherence according the fractionation model for C3 plants of Farquhar et al. (1989; 1982). Based on direct CO2 and H2O gas-exchange measurements, we expect more negative δ13C values as AN is reduced while gs stays constant or is reduced to a minor degree (Grams et al. 2007). This example demonstrates once the assumptions of the well-accepted fractionation model are violated, the conclusions drawn from isotope measurements can lead to physiologically implausible results. As the ratio of Rubisco to PEPC activity decreases significantly under elevated O3 (up to 20-fold, Dizengremel et al. 2009), the fractionation model must be adjusted, e.g., by increasing the parameter “b” representing the fractionation of all carboxylation processes as suggested by Saurer et al. (1995). Therefore, the consultation of the history of human impact in the past for the respective forests is of great value for the data interpretation.
3.3 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)
Ambient SO2 concentrations increased considerably since the advent of industrialization and became an increasing problem across Asia, Europe and North America, particularly before the mid-1980s. This pollutant may have had a stronger impact on the isotope ratios in plants and tree rings than previously recognized. Sakata and Suzuki (2000) described a significant δ13C increase in Japanese fir trees that underwent diseases and insect pests when being weakened by SO2. Savard et al. (2004) reported an unprecedented δ13C positive shift by up to 4‰ for spruce tree rings induced by SO2 emissions from a large smelter in Canada. Wagner and Wagner (2006) and Boettger et al. (2014) described major increases in the long-term trend in pine and fir tree-ring δ13C series between 1945 and 1990 and a subsequent decrease after 1990 reflecting the trends of SO2 concentration in German sites. In their study of English oak trees exposed to SO2, Rinne et al. (2010) document a 2.5‰ δ13C rise with insignificant changes in the δ18O series. Many other examples of SO2 effects in natural settings around the world could be cited, with the singular common impacts of rising tree-ring δ13C values during the time of exposure.
A possible explanation for this general δ13C increase is a secondary fractionation resulting from SO2 phytotoxicity, which causes a decline in various physiological activities. Closure of stomata is generally induced by foliar SO2 uptake, and acidification of solution often invoked to explain this closure. Recently, molecular biological research suggests instead that guard cell mortality cause stomatal closure (Ooi et al. 2019). However, plant response mechanisms are intricate as they depend on the SO2 concentration (and presence of other co-pollutants), duration of exposure and the availability of water (e.g., Maier-Maercker and Koch 1995; Lee et al. 2017). Under acute controlled exposures (25 mg SO2/m3), the foliar system of trees becomes photo inhibited and exhibits decreasing A, gs and ci (Duan et al. 2019). Overall, authors from diverse research fields ascribe the related tree-ring δ13C increase and growth reactions to various combinations of changes in gs, AN, starch production and priority of C allocation (e.g., Darral 1989; Meng et al. 1995; Kolb and Matyssek 2001; Grams et al. 2007).
In the Canadian example cited above, a reduction of gs was not the only response caused by exposure because a concomitant δ2H decrease in tree-ring nitrated cellulose was significant, and stem growth did not notably change (Savard et al. 2005). Considering intrinsic factors only, decreases in δ2H and δ18O generally reflect stomatal opening (Dongmann et al. 1974; Farquhar and Lloyd 1993; Sensula and Wilczynski 2017). When considering extrinsic factors, this case of severe exposure of trees to emissions may have acidified the upper soil layers, damaging fine surface roots and shifting water uptake to large, deeper roots, where source water δ2H (δ18O) values are lower (Chap. 18). In the German examples, the combined physiological responses to high SO2 pollution are expressed by the long-term positive δ13C series with no significant to moderate δ18O changes (Wagner and Wagner 2006; Boettger et al. 2014), and no effects on δ2H values (Boettger et al. 2014). This case reflects increased respiration rates that expel higher proportions of 12C and generate tissues with higher δ13C signals, without modifying the δ18O values. Otherwise, foliar gas-exchange responses inferred from increasing δ13C with moderately decreasing δ18O trends a priori should reflect increases in AN and gs. However, this scenario is in contrast with directly measured CO2 and H2O gas-exchange values under controlled SO2 exposure, as Atkinson and Winner (1987), Kropff et al. (1990), Wedler et al. (1995) and Randewig et al. (2012) report a reduction in AN and gs, which should result in an overall decrease in δ13C values. The observed reduction of AN better fits with the general observation that ring growth does not increase with the isotopic changes. Hence, aside from the possible extrinsic factors proposed above, the SO2 induced enzymatic detoxification and reduced carboxylation rate represent other mechanisms that could explain strong increases in 13C uptake (Randewig et al. 2012), in some cases outweighing the prediction of the widely accepted C-isotope fractionation model by Farquhar et al. (1989, 1982).
As shown for ozone exposure, the impact of SO2 detoxification and its effect on δ13C values are not considered by the C-isotope fractionation model for C3 plants. Moreover, foliar response models do not take into account the extrinsic effects on tree-ring δ18O (δ2H) changes. Thus, the common data interpretation assuming that a δ13C increase with none to moderate δ18O (δ2H) changes would be caused by an increased AN is not correct and does not correspond to real physiological responses to SO2. Accordingly, paleoclimate reconstruction, the evaluation of the water-use efficiency (Chap. 17), or the use of the dual C and O isotope gas-exchange model (Chap. 16) could all be erroneous if based on tree-ring series impacted by airborne acidifying emissions. Therefore, the effects of these emissions must be considered for the evaluation of tree ring isotope chronologies originating from regions and periods with large SO2 emissions.
3.4 Gaseous Reactive Nitrogen (Nr) Compounds: NO, NO2, NHX
As observed for ozone and SO2, the emissions of biologically reactive N compounds (Nr) have greatly increased (NOx from combustion and NHy from agricultural fertilization) since the beginning of the industrialization. The distribution of Nr occurs via large-scale atmospheric transport and is deposited into terrestrial ecosystems. Although N deposition is identified as the most important growth driver in managed European forests (Etzold et al. 2020), the current often excessive N input can reduce forest growth (Waldner et al. 2014).
Vegetation demand for N is mostly met by root uptake of nitrate (NO3), ammonium (NH4+) and dissolved organic N-compounds from the pedosphere (Chap. 12). However, the direct uptake of gaseous Nr (NO, NO2, NHy) via stomata can be substantial and several studies report quantities obtained in this manner total between 10 and 37% of plant-N demand (Amman et al. 1999; Harrison et al. 2000; Millard and Grelet 2010; Vallano and Sparks 2013; Chap. 12).
3.4.1 Factors Impacting Nr-uptake by Leaves
The main factors influencing the assimilation of N by the foliar system are: (i) the species of trees, (ii) the proximity to anthropogenic emissions, (iii) the plant and canopy structure, and (iv) the type of Nr. (i) Chaparro-Suarez et al. (2011) reported a species dependent variability for NO2 uptake, which is directly correlated with gs confirming the regulation of stomatal uptake. Accordingly, they report Betula pendula had the highest gs and highest NO2 uptake, in contrast to Pinus sylvestris, where both values were the lowest. In all cases, they found no NO2 compensation point (meaning that plants do not produce NO2), or cuticular N transfer, which agrees with other studies (Teklemariam and Sparks (2004); Gessler et al. (2000). (ii) Savard et al. (2009) and Guerrieri et al. (2010) studied trees exposed to emissions in the vicinity of industrial complexes and reported tree-ring series carrying δ15N values apparently reflecting airborne industrial NO2. For trees growing in the vicinity of highways, similar δ15N values were found in the tree rings as in the atmosphere (Amman et al. 1999; Saurer et al. 2004; Doucet et al. 2012). These authors found an increase in the δ15N values of the NO2 by 5‰ to 8‰ relative to the δ15N of the background values. It is assumed that the exhaust treatment by car catalyzers results in an enrichment of the 15NO2 due to the stronger bounding of the heavier15N . Thus, the lighter 14NO2 reacts more readily on the catalyzer resulting in N2 and O2. (iii) Stand and canopy structure impact N-deposition considerably (Bettinger et al. 2017) as the N-compounds react with the surfaces of leaves, branches and stems, reducing their concentrations in air. Baldocchi and Wilson (2001) indicate a decreasing importance of surface deposition with decreasing foliage density, as indicated by reduced deposition velocities. (iv) For each of the different biological Nr molecules, different flux rates are found due to the different solubility of the respective molecules in an aqueous milieu. NH3 shows a much higher water solubility than NO2 and NO (Felix et al. 2017; Castro et al. 2005), and NO is less soluble than NO2 by an order of magnitude (Neubert et al. 1993). Accordingly, this solubility hierarchy is reflected in the flux rates for all three molecules (Teklemariam and Sparks 2004, Gessler et al. 2000). Likewise, mesophyll resistance (rm) is another critical parameter in the chain of incorporation for gaseous compounds, and is considerably higher for NO than for NO2 (Van der Eerden et al. 1998), and higher for NO2 than for NH3 (Teklemariam and Sparks 2004; Castro et al. 2005; Gessler et al. 2000). In contrast to NO2 and NH3, most authors found stomatal NO fluxes negligibly small with little or no impact on plant physiology and in plant organic matter (Neubert et al. 1993). As NH3 is highly water soluble and rapidly converted to NH4+ in the aqueous milieu of the mesophyll cells, rm for this gas is low and it is assimilated via the glutamine synthetase / glutamate synthase cycle (Sparks 2009; Castro et al. 2005; Pearson and Soares 1998). In contrast, the assimilation of NO2 is somewhat more complex. Once this gas enters the intercellular cavity it is rapidly dissolved in the aqueous phase of the apoplast via disproportionation to nitrite and nitrate. NO2 scavenging by ascorbate represents an alternative parallel pathway. The resulting nitrite and nitrate from both pathways are metabolized via nitrite and nitrate reductase for the ferredoxin dependent reduction of NO2– to NH4+ and the glutamine synthetase driven production of amino acids (Ramge et al. 1993). A good overview is given by Sparks (2009).
3.4.2 Physiological Effects Caused by Gaseous N-compounds
The atmospheric δ15N values of Nr in the vicinity of emission sources are often distinctly different than those from regions without Nr-pollution (background values, either enriched or depleted in 15N). This allows the quantification of the direct uptake of Nr-gases via stomata and their incorporation into organic matter, as these products are transferred via phloem to branches, stems (tree rings) and roots. Since the δ15N variations are detectable in tree rings (although N is at lower concentrations than in leaves), the historical development of anthropogenic N emissions can be inferred retrospectively (Amman et al. 1999; Saurer et al. 2004; Choi et al. 2005; Guerrieri et al. 2009; Savard et al. 2009; Savard 2010; Sun et al. 2010; Mathias and Thomas 2018).
Assimilation and incorporation of Nr impact numerous metabolic processes (see above) reflected in AN and gs (e.g., Gessler et al. 2000; Siegwolf et al. 2001). However, few studies have investigated the impact of assimilating anthropogenic N on the C and O isotope fractionation in plant organic matter. In 1988, Martin et al. reported increasing δ13C values in leaves and wood of young trees, which were exposed to increased SO2 + O3 and SO2 + O3 + NO2 concentrations for a four-week period. They argued that the δ13C increase was a result of stomatal limitation. But they did not examine the plant responses for each pollutant separately, thus it was not possible to clearly assign the impact of each pollutant on specific plant mechanisms due to the combined application of all three pollutants. As shown by Saurer et al. (1995), the increase in δ13C values for O3 exposed plants was primarily caused by an increased PEPC activity.
In a comprehensive case study, Siegwolf et al. (2001) analyzed the impact of chronic NO2 exposure on the C and O isotope ratios and CO2 and H2O gas exchange. Populus euramericana vars Dorskamp cuttings were grown in climate-controlled growth chambers under limiting and surplus soil-N regimes. One chamber was supplied with filtered air and in the other an average NO2 concentration of 100 nmol/mol was maintained for 12 h per day for three months (details in Siegwolf et al. 2001). Irrespective of the soil-N regime, NO2 exposure caused δ13C to increase in leaf organic matter relative to plants grown in clean air as reported in other studies, (Bukata and Kyser 2007, Vallano and Sparks 2013) whereas the δ18O values were reduced (Siegwolf et al. 2001; Fig. 24.3). Leaf uptake of Nr compounds allows for a direct and rapid N availability in plant metabolism and has a fertilizing effect. Since Nr uptake via leaves stimulates AN and leads to higher gs, this affects the C and O isotope fractionation (see Chaps. 9, 10 and 19). For both, limiting and surplus soil-N regimes, NO2 exposure caused an increase in δ13C and reduction in δ18O values indicating higher AN and gs values, respectively, which is confirmed by CO2 and H2O gas-exchange measurements. In the absence of NO2, the effect of soil-N surplus relative to soil-N limitation results in a decrease of δ13C and δ18O values, suggesting that AN might be reduced or constant whereas gs is considerably increased. Yet, an increase of the soil-N supply results in an increase of AN and gs, while gs rises over-proportionally relative to AN (Sage and Pearcy 1987; Dinh et al. 2017). The CO2 and H2O gas exchange measurements confirm an increase in gs, while AN is increased as well but not to the degree that δ13C would increase. However, care must be taken when generalizing this response to changes in soil N-supply. Chapter 23 describes different responses, mostly for coniferous species (see Figs. 23.5 and 23.6). A meta-analysis showed an opposite trend in response to soil-N fertilization (decrease in ∆13C, increase in δ13C) after the first few years. The impact of N-deposition can cause divergent isotopic response patterns, depending on the nutrient status, water supply, canopy traits and structure, species composition etc., which needs to be considered for the data interpretation.
It is noteworthy how the isotopic response patterns in deciduous trees differ between the cases of “soil N-changes only”, “NO2 exposure only”, or “soil N change and NO2 exposure” (Fig. 24.3). These isotopic patterns (Fig. 24.3) as a result of NO2 exposure were also found in air pollution studies using tree-ring samples. Saurer and Siegwolf (2007) and Guerrieri et al. (2009) analyzed tree rings from Picea abies growing along a highly frequented freeway in Switzerland and found δ13C and δ18O patterns invoked by NO2 exposure. However this pattern as shown in Fig. 24.3 might change with the occurrence of other more dominant impacts such as drought. In the same study of Guerrieri et al. (2009), the impact of NO2 emissions from an oil refinery in Southern Italy were analyzed for changes in δ15 N (as an indicator), δ13C and δ18O values from tree rings. Drought events at this Mediterranean site occur frequently, in contrast to the sites along the Swiss freeway where water supply is not limiting. Thus the trees near the oil refinery responded primarily to drought stress by reducing gs to minimize water loss. Consequently, the protection against drought is more relevant for plant survival therefore the drought response outweighs the influence of NO2, which was also reflected in the increased iWUE (Guerrieri et al. 2010). For trees, which are not subject to other dominant stressors (drought, high concentrations of pollutants, flooding or abrupt changes in the vegetation), this isotopic pattern as shown in Fig. 24.3 was seen in most NO2-controlled studies, and its application can serve for diagnostic or monitoring purposes.
Regarding NH3 or NO we have not found any literature that described the impact of NH3 or NO on the isotopic fractionation in trees, which does not mean that we can exclude any isotopic effect. Based on gas-exchange data we assume the following isotopic response as a result of NH3 exposure: Fangmeier et al. (1994) and Krupa (2003) report an increase in AN and gs with increasing NH3 concentration. They hypothesized that gs was indirectly impacted because an increase in NH3 enhanced the carbon demand for building skeleton C compounds. This in turn generated an increase of AN, reducing ci, leading to an increase in gs. Based on this mechanistic chain, we premise that ∂E/∂A (E is transpiration and A assimilation) is a constant (Cowan and Farqugar 1977). Therefore, we assume a decrease in δ18O (increase of gs, Chap. 10), while δ13C stays constant, as a consequence of the proportional increase in AN. However, this hypothesis must be verified experimentally. With regard to the small NO flux and its low aqueous solubility, we assume that its physiological impact is negligible at ambient concentrations.
3.4.3 Impact of Anthropogenic Nr on Root N Assimilation and Tree-Ring δ15N Series
The reader interested in the airborne Nr transformations in soils can find a relevant discussion in Chap. 12. A final point regarding the assimilation of anthropogenic N compounds as depicted by tree-ring series grown under natural conditions is that soil biogeochemical conditions can play a key role in the way coniferous trees respond to anthropogenic N deposition, especially in forests where soil is N limited. Indeed, depending on the N status of the forest and on soil conditions (pH, action exchange capacity, base cation saturation ratio, etc.), direct or ectomycorrhizal (EcM) root uptake may take place. The direct assimilation may not fractionate N isotopes prior to biological reactions within trees, but it is well known that EcM fungi generally are enriched in 15N in the process of fungal metabolism, and release the relatively light N that is transferred to the roots and stems of trees, with different degrees of fractionation depending on the abundance and diversity of the various community components (e.g., Hobbie and Högberg 2012). The proportions of direct and EcM N uptake modulate the final δ15N values recorded in tree-ring series. There might be a tipping point at which the bacterial and fungi communities in close association with the root system are modified so that trees exposed to similar enhancement of bioavailable N but growing on different physicochemical soil conditions will record opposite long-term δ15N trends (Savard et al. 2019). All things considered, it is no surprise that soil dynamics will impact the tree-ring series as the dominant part of N in coniferous stems originates from soil N compounds. It is clear however that research is needed on the ultimate modulation of tree-ring δ15N series by long-term changes of microbial dynamics in soils.
4 Concluding Remarks
Airborne pollutants may alter both the leaf and root assimilation paths for carbon and nutrients in trees. It is often difficult to uncover and identify the coherences between the impact of a single air pollutant or other environmental vectors and specific plant responses with their stable isotopic composition. In the real world, plants are often exposed to many pollutants, that together modify the atmospheric and soil environments. Therefore, the knowledge on how each pollutant specifically affects plant metabolism is instrumental for a better understanding of the combined impact under consideration of a given environmental situation. Furthermore, it facilitates the planning of combined experimental assessments and for modeling ecosystem responses to pollution exposure. The consideration of the vegetation and management history facilitates an accurate interpretation of the isotope values from long-term chronologies and the inclusion of other parameters (tree ring width, wood density etc.; Sidorova et al. 2019) strengthens the interpretations of tree-ring isotopic data.
References
Adams MA, Buckley TN, Turnbull TL (2020) Diminishing CO2-driven gains in water-use efficiency of global forests. Nat Clim Chang 10:466–471
Aber JD, Nadelhoffer KN, Steudler P, Melillo JM (1989) Nitrogen saturation in Northern forest ecosystems: excess nitrogen from fossil fuel combustion may stress the biosphere. Bioscience 39(6):378–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/1311067
Ainsworth EA, Yendrek CR, Sitch S, Collins WJ, Emberson LD (2012) The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63:637–661. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103829
Ammann M, Siegwolf RTW, Pichlmayer F, Suter M, Saurer M, Brunold C (1999) Estimating the uptake of traffic derived NO2 from 15N abundance Norway spruce needles. Oecologia 118:124–131
Andersen CP (2003) Source–sink balance and carbon allocation below ground in plants exposed to ozone. New Phytologist 157: 213–228
Anav A, De Marco A, Proietti C, Alessandri A, Dell’Aquila A, Cionni I, Vitale M (2016) Comparing concentration-based (AOT40) and stomatal uptake (PODY) metrics for ozone risk assessment to European forests. Glob Change Biol 22, 1608–1627. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13138
Andersen CP, Ritter W, Gregg J, Matyssek R, Grams TEE (2010) Below-ground carbon allocation in mature beech and spruce trees following long-term, experimentally enhanced O3 exposure in Southern Germany. Environ Pollut 158:2604–2609
Ashmore MR (2005) Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation. Plant Cell Environ 28:949–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01341.x
Atkinson CJ, Winner WE (1987) Gas exchange characteristics of heteromeles arbutifolia during fumigation with sulphur dioxide. New Phytol 106:423–436
Bader M, Siegwolf RTW, Körner Ch (2010) Sustained enhancement of photosynthesis in mature deciduous forest trees after 8 years of free air CO2 enrichment (FACE). Planta 232(5):1115
Bader MKF, Leuzinger S, Keel SG, Siegwolf RTW, Hagedorn F, Schleppi P, Ch, Körner (2013) Central European hardwood trees in a high-CO2 future: synthesis of an 8-year forest canopy CO2 enrichment project. J Ecol 101:1509–1519. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12149
Baldocchi DD, Wilson K (2001) Forest canopies as sources and sinks of atmospheric trace gases: scaling up to ecosystem level. In: Gasche R, Papen H, Rennenberg H (eds) Trace gas exchange in forest ecosystems. Kluwer, Boston, pp 229–242
Barbour MM, Roden JS, Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR (2004) Expressing leaf water and cellulose oxygen isotope ratios as enrichment above source water reveals evidence of a Péclet effect. Oecologia 138:426–435
Barbour MM, Andrews TJ, Farquhar GD (2001) Correlations between oxygen isotope ratios of wood constituents of Quercus and Pinus samples from around the world. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:335–348
Battipaglia G et al (2013) Elevated CO2 increases tree-level intrinsic water use efficiency: insights from carbon and oxygen isotope analyses in tree rings across three forest FACE sites. New Phytol 197:544–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12044
Belmecheri S, Lavergne A (2020) Compiled records of atmospheric CO2 concentrations and stable carbon isotopes to reconstruct climate and derive plant ecophysiological indices from tree rings. Dendrochronologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2020.125748
Bettinger P, Boston K, Siry JP, Grebner DL (2017) Optimization of tree-and stand-level objectives. In: Forest management and planning. Academic Press, 362p
Boettger T, Haupt M, Friedrich M, Waterhouse JS (2014) Reduced climate sensitivity of carbon, oxygen and hydrogen stable isotope ratios in tree-ring cellulose of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) influenced by background SO2 in Franconia (Germany, Central Europe). Environ Pollut 185:281–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.030
Breeker DO (2017) Atmospheric pCO2 control on speolothem stable carbon isotope compositions. Earth Planet Sci Lett 458:58–68
Brooks J, Barnard HR, Coulombe R, McDonnell JJ (2010) Ecohydrologic separation of water between trees and streams in a Mediterranean climate. Nat Geosci 3:100–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo722
Buckley TN, Sack L, Farquhar GD (2017) Optimal plant water economy. Plant Cell Environ 40:881–896
Bukata AR, Kyser TK (2007) Carbon and nitrogen isotope variations in tree-rings as records of perturbations in regional carbon and nitrogen cycles. Environ Sci Technol 41:1331–1338
Bytnerowicz A, Fenn ME (1996) Nitrogen deposition in California forests: a review. Environ Pollut 92:127–146
Cailleret M, Ferretti M, Gessler A, Rigling A, Schaub M (2018) Ozone effects on European forest growth-Towards an integrative approach. J Ecol 106:1377–1389
Castro A, Stulen I, De Kok LJ (2005) Impact of NH3 deposition on plant growth and functioning: a case study with Brassica oleracea. In: Omasa K, Nouchi I, De Kok LJ (eds) Plant response to air pollution and global change. Springer, Tokyo
Chaparro-Suarez IG, Meixner FX, Kesselmeier J (2011) Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) uptake by vegetation controlled by atmospheric concentrations and plant stomatal aperture. Atmos Environ 45:5742–5750
Choi WJ, Lee KH (2012) A short overview on linking annual tree ring carbon isotopes to historical changes in atmospheric environment. For Sci Technol 8(2):61–66
Choi WJ, Lee SM, Chang SX, Ro HM (2005) Variations of δ13C and δ15N in Pinus densiflora tree-rings and their relationship to environmental changes in Eastern Korea. Water Air Soil Pollut 164:173–187
Cieslik S (2009) Ozone fluxes over various plant ecosystems in Italy: a review. Environ Pollut 157:1487–1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.09.050
Cieslik SA (2004) Ozone uptake by various surface types: a comparison between dose and exposure. Atmos Environ 38:2409–2420
Cowan IR, Farqugar GD (1977) Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. In: Jennings DH (ed) Integration of activity in the higher plant. Univ, Press Cambridge, pp 471–505
Craine JM, Brookshire EHJ, Cramer MD, Hasselquist NJ, Koba K, Marin-Spiotta E, Wang L (2015) Ecological interpretations of nitrogen isotope ratios of terrestrial plants and soils. Plant Soil 396:1–26
Dansgaard W (1954) The O18-abundance in fresh water. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 6:241–260
Dansgaard W (1964) Stable isotopes in precipitation. Tellus 16:436–468
Darral NM (1989) The effect of air pollutants on physiological processes in plants. Plant Cell Environ 12:1–30
Doubnerová V, Ryslavá H (2011) What can enzymes of C4 photosynthesis do for C3 plants under stress? Plant Sci 180:575–583
Dinh TH, Watanabe K, Takaragawa H, Nakabaru M, Kawamitsu Y (2017) Photosynthetic response and nitrogen use efficiency of sugarcane under drought stress conditions with different nitrogen application levels. Plant Production Sci 20(4):412–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2017.1371570
Dizengremel P (2001) Effects of ozone on the carbon metabolism of forest trees. Plant Physiol Biochem 39:729–742
Dizengremel P, Le Thiec D, Hasenfratz-Sauder MP, Vaultier MN, Bagard M, Jolivet Y (2009) Metabolic-dependent changes in plant cell redox power after ozone exposure. Plant Biol 11:35–42
Dongmann G, Nürnberg HW, Förstel H, Wagener K (1974) On the enrichment of H218O in the leaves of transpiring plants. Radiat Environ Biophys 11:41–52
Doucet A, Savard MM, Bégin C, Smirnoff A (2012) Tree-ring δ15N values to infer air quality changes at regional scale. Chem Geol 320(321):9–16
Doucet A, Savard MM, Bégin C, Smirnoff A (2011) Is wood pre-treatment essential for tree-ring nitrogen concentration and isotope analysis? Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 25:469–475
Duan J, Fu B, Kang H, Song Z, Jia M, Cao D, Wei A (2019) Response of gas-exchange characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence to acute sulfur dioxide exposure in landscape plants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 171:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.12.064
Elhani S, Lema BF, Zeller B, Brechet C, Guehl JM, Dupouey JL (2003) Inter- annual mobility of nitrogen between beech rings: a labelling experiment. Ann for Sci 60(6):503–508
Elsik CG, Flagler RB, Boutton TW (1993) Carbon isotope composition and gas exchange of loblolly and shortleaf pine as affected by ozone and water stress. In: Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farquhar GD (eds) Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 227–244
Etzold S, Ferretti M, Reinds GJ, Solberg S, Gessler A, Waldner P, Schaub M, Simpson D, Benham S, Hansen K, Ingerslev M, Jonard M, Karlsson PE, Lindroos AJ, Marchetto A, Manninger M, Meesenburg H, Merilä P, Nöjd P, Rautio P, Sanders TGM, Seidling W, Skudnik M, Thimonier A, Verstraeten A, Vesterdal L, Vejpustkova M, de Vries W (2020) Nitrogen deposition is the most important environmental driver of growth of pure, even-aged and managed European forests. For Ecol Manage 458:117762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117762
Fangmeier A, Hadwiger-Fangmeier A, Van der Eerden LJM, Jäger HJ (1994) Effects of atmospheric ammonia on vegetation – a review. Environ Pollut 86:43–82
Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:503–537. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.40.1.503
Farquhar GD, O’Leary MH, Berry JA (1982) On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol 9:121–137
Farquhar GD, Lloyd J (1993) Carbon and Oxygen Isotope Effects in the Exchange of Carbon Dioxide between Terrestrial Plants and the Atmosphere. Stable Isotopes and Plant Carbon-water Relations. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 47–70
Farquhar GD, Henry BK, Styles JM (1997) A rapid on-line technique for determination of oxygen isotope composition of nitrogen-containing organic matter and water. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 11:1554–1560
Feng Z, Calatayud V, Zhu J, Kobayashi K (2018) Ozone exposure- and flux-based response relationships with photosynthesis of winter wheat under fully open air condition. Sci Total Environ 619–62:1538–1544
Feng X, Epstein S (1994) Carbon isotopes of trees from arid environments and implications for reconstructing atmospheric CO2 concentration. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59(12):2599-2608
Felix JD, Elliott EM, Gay DA (2017) Spatial and temporal patterns of nitrogen isotopic composition of ammonia at U.S. ammonia monitoring network sites. Atmos Environ 150:434–442
Fowler D, Flechard C, Skiba U, Coyle M, Cape JN (1998) The atmospheric budget of oxidized nitrogen and its role in ozone formation and deposition. New Phytol 139:11–23
Fowler D, Flechard C, Cape JN, Storeton-West RL, Coyle M (2001) Measurements of Ozone deposition to vegetation, quantifying the Flux, stomatal and non-stomatal components. Water Air Soil Poll 130:63–74
Frank DC et al (2015) Water-use efficiency and transpiration across European forests during the Anthropocene. Nat Clim Change 5:579–584
Freyer HD et al (1979) On the 13C record in tree rings. Part 2. Registration of microenvironmental CO2 and anomalous pollution effect. Tellus 31:124–137
Franks PJ, Adams MA, Amthor JS, Barbour MM, Berry JA, Ellsworth DS, Varquhar GD, Ghannoum O, Lloyd J, McDowell N, Norby RJ, Tissue DT, von Caemmerer S (2013) Sensitivity of plants to changing atmospheric CO2 concentration: from the geological past to the next century. New Phytol 197:1077–1094
Fuhrer J, Booker F (2003) Ecological issues related to ozone: agricultural issues. Environ Int 29:141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0160-4120(02)00157-5
Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Capone DG, Boyer EW, Howarth RW et al (2004) Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeo-Chem 70:153–226
Geng L, Becky A, Jihong Cole-Dai, Steigc EJ, Savarinod J, Sofena ED, Schauer AJ (2014) Nitrogen isotopes in ice core nitrate linked to anthropogenic atmospheric acidity change. Proc Nat Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319441111
Gessler A et al (2009) Within-canopy and ozone fumigation effects on delta C-13 and Delta O-18 in adult beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees: relation to meteorological and gas exchange parameters. Tree Physiol 29:1349–1365. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpp066
Gessler A, Pedro Ferrio J, Hommel R, Treydte K, Werner RA, Monson RK (2014) Stable isotopes in tree rings: towards a mechanistic understanding of isotope fractionation and mixing processes from the leaves to the wood. Tree Physiol 34:796–818. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpu040
Gessler A, Rienks M, Rennenberg H (2000) NH3 and NO2 fluxes between beech trees and the atmosphere-correlation with climatic and physiological parameters. New Phytol 147:539–560
Gessler A, Rienks M, Rennenberg H (2002) Stomatal uptake and cuticular adsorption contribute to dry deposition of NH3 and NO2 to needles of adult spruce (Picea abies) trees. New Phytol 156:179–194
Giguère-Croteau B, Bergeron Y, Girardin MP, Drobyshev I, Silva LCR, Hélie JF, Garneau M (2019) North America’s oldest boreal trees are more efficient water users due to increased [CO2], but do not grow faster. PNAS. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816686116
Gimeno TE, McVicar TR, O’Grady AP, Tissue DT, Ellsworth DS (2020) Elevated CO2 did not affect the hydrological balance of a mature native Eucalyptus woodland. Glob Change Biol 24:3010–3024
Grams TEE, Matyssek R (2010) Stable isotope signatures reflect competitiveness between trees under changed CO2/O3 regimes. Environ Pollut 158:1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.08.037
Grams TEE, Kozovits AR, Häberle KH, Matyssek R, Dawson TE (2007) Combining δ13C and δ18O analyses to unravel competition, CO2 and O3 effects on the physiological performance of different-aged trees. Plant, Cell Environ 30:1023–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01696.x
Gruber N, Galloway JN (2008) An earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature 451:293e296
Grulke N, Paoletti E (2005) A field system to deliver desired O3 concentrations in leaf-level gas exchange measurements: results for Holm Oak near a CO2 spring (Engl.). Phyton-Horn 45(1):21
Grulke N, Paoletti E, Heath RL (2007) Comparison of calculated and measured foliar O3 flux in crop and forest species. Environ Pollut 146(3):640–647
Grünhage L, Krupa SV, Legge AH, Jäger HJ (2004) Ambient flux-based critical values of ozone for protecting vegetation: differing spatial scales and uncertainties in risk assessment. Atmos Environ 38:2433–2437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.12.039
Guerrieri MR, Siegwolf RTW, Saurer M, Jäggi M, Cherubini P, Ripullone F, Borghetti M (2009) Impact of different nitrogen emission sources on tree physiology: a triple stable isotope approach. Atmos Environ 43(2009):410–418
Guerrieri MR, Jennings K, Belmecheri S, Asbjornsen H, Ollinger S (2017) Evaluating climate signal recorded in tree ring δ13C and δ18O from bulk wood and -cellulose for six species across the northeastern US. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 31(24):2081–2091
Guerrieri MR, Siegwolf RTW, Saurer M, Ripullone F, Mencuccini M, Borghetti M (2010) Anthropogenic NOx emissions alter the intrinsic water-use efficiency (WUEi) for Quercus cerris stands under Mediterranean climate conditions. Environ Pollut 158:2841–2847
Gunderson CA, Sholtis JD, Wullschleger SD, Tissue DT, Hanson PJ, Norby RJ (2002) Environmental and stomatal control of photosynthetic enhancement in the canopy of a sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) plantation during 3 years of CO2 enrichment. Plant Cell Environ 25:379–393
Günthardt-Goerg MS, Vollenweider P (2007) Linking stress with macroscopic and microscopic leaf response in trees: new diagnostic perspectives. Environ Pollut 147:467–488
Hare VJ, Loftus E, Jeffrey A, Ramsey CB (2018) Atmospheric CO2 effect on stable carbon isotope composition of terrestrial fossil archives. Nat Commun 9:252
Harrison AF, Schulze ED, Gebauer G, Bruckner G (2000) Canopy uptake and utilization of atmospheric pollutant nitrogen. In Schulze ED (ed), Carbon and nitrogen cycling in European forest ecosystems, pp 171–188. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Heck WW, Taylor OC, Tingey DT (1988) Assessment of crop loss from air pollutants. Springer, Dodrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1367-7
Herrick JD, Thomas RB (2001) No photosynthetic down-regulation in sweetgum trees (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) after three years of CO2 enrichment at the Duke Forest FACE experiment. Plant Cell Environ 24:53–64
Hobbie EA, Högberg P (2012) Nitrogen isotopes link mycorrhizal fungi and plants to nitrogen dynamics. New Phytol 196(2):367–382
Högberg P (2007) Nitrogen impacts on forest carbon. Nature 447, 781e782
Hoshika Y, Carriero G, Feng Z, Zhang Y, Paoletti E (2014) Determinants of stomatal sluggishness in ozone exposed deciduous tree species. Sci Total Environ 481:453–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.080
Hoshika Y, Watanabe M, Kitao M, Häberle KH, Grams TEE, Koike T, Matyssek R (2015) Ozone induces stomatal narrowing in European and Siebold’s beeches: a comparison between two experiments of free-air ozone exposure. Environ Pollut 196:527–533
Hu EZ, Gao F, Xin Y, Jia HX, Li KH, Hu JJ, Feng ZZ (2015) Concentration- and flux-based ozone dose-response relationships for five poplar clones grown in North China. Environ Pollut 207:21–30
Jäggi M, Fuhrer J (2007) Oxygen and carbon isotopic signatures reveal a long-term effect of free-air ozone enrichment on leaf conductance in semi-natural grassland. Atmos Environ 41:8811–8881
Jarvis pg, McNaughton kg (1986) Stomatal Control of Transpiration: Scaling Up from Leaf to Region. Advances in Ecological Research 15:1–49
Jiang M et al (2020) The fate of carbon in a mature forest under carbon dioxide enrichment. Nature 580:227–231
Jolivet Y, Bagard M, Cabané M, Vaultier MN, Gandin A, Afif D, Dizengremel P, Le Thiec D (2016) Deciphering the ozone-induced changes in cel- lular processes: A prerequisite for ozone risk assessment at the tree and forest levels. Annals For Sci 73:923–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-016-0580-3
Kangasjarvi J, Jaspers P, Kollist H (2005) Signalling and cell death in ozone-exposed plants. Plant Cell Environ 28:1021–1036
Karlsson P, Braun S, Broadmeadow M, Elvira S, Emberson L, Gimeno BS, Le Thiec D, Novak K, Oksanen E, Schaub M, Uddling J, Wilkinson M (2007) Risk assessments for forest trees: The performance of the ozone flux versus the AOT concepts. Environ Pollut 146:608–616
Karlsson PE, Uddling J, Braun S, Broadmeadow M, Elvira S, Gimeno BS, Le Thiec D, Oksanen E, Vandermeiren K, Wilkinson M, Emberson L (2004) New critical levels for ozone effects on young trees based on AOT40 and simulated cumulative leaf uptake of ozone. Atmos Environ 38:2283–2294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.027
Karnosky DF, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Kubiske ME, Hendrey GR, Weinstein D, Nosal M, Percy KE (2005) Scaling ozone responses of forest trees to the ecosystem level in a changing climate. Plant Cell Environ 28:965–998
Keel S, Pepin S, Leuzinger S, Körner Ch (2007) Stomatal conductance in mature deciduous forest trees exposed to elevated CO2. Trees 21:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-006-0106-y
Keeling RF, Graven HD, Welp LR, Resplandy L, Bi J, Piper SC, Sun Y, Bollenbacher A, Meijer HAJ (2017) Atmospheric evidence for a global secular increase in carbon isotopic discrimination of land photosynthesis. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 114:10361–10366
Kitao M, Löw M, Heerdt C, Grams TEE, Häberle K-H, Matyssek R (2009) Effects of chronic ozone exposure on gas exchange responses of adult beech trees (Fagus sylvatica) as related to the within-canopy light gradient. Environ Pollut 157:537–544
Klein T, Bader MKF, Leuzinger S, Mildner M, Schleppi P, Siegwolf RTW, Körner Ch (2016) Growth and carbon relations of mature Picea abies trees under 5 years of free-air CO2 enrichment. J Ecol 104:1720–1733
Kolb TE, Matyssek R (2001) Limitations and perspectives about scaling ozone impacts in trees. Environ Pollut 115:373–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00228-7
Körner C et al (2005) Carbon flux and growth in mature deciduous forest trees exposed to elevated CO2. Science 309:1360–1362. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1113977
Köstner B, Brion P, Siegwolf RTW, Granier A (1996) Estimates of water Vaopr Flux and Canopy Conductance of Scots Pine at three Level Utilizing Different Xylem Sap Flow Methods. Theor Appl Climatol 53:105–113
Kozovits AR, Matyssek R, Blaschke H, Göttlein A, Grams TEE (2005) Competition increasingly dominates the responsiveness of juvenile beech and spruce to elevated CO2 and/or O3 concentrations throughout two subsequent growing seasons. Glob Change Biol 11:1387–1401
Kropff MJ, Smeets WLM, Meijer EMJ, van der Zalm AJA, Bakx EJ (1990) Effects of sulphur dioxide on leaf photosynthesis: the role of temperature and humidity. Physiol Plant 80:655–661
Krupa SV (2003) Effects of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) on terrestrial vegetation: a review. Environ Pollut 124:179–221
Kurschner K (1996) Leaf stomata as biosensors of paleoatmospheric CO2 levels. LPP contributions Series 5, Utrecht
Laisk A, Kull O, Moldau H (1989) Ozone concentration in leaf intercellular air spaces is close to zero. Plant Physiol 90:1163–1167
Lavergne A, Voelker SL, Csank AM, Graven H, de Boer HJ, Daux V, Robertson I, Dorado-Liñán I, Martinez-Sancho E, Battipaglia G, Bloomfield KJ, Meinzer FC, Camarero JJ, Clisby R, Fang Y, Menzel A, Still CJ, Keen RM, Roden JS, Dawson TE, Prentice IC (2019) Historical trends in the stomatal limitation of photosynthesis: empirical support for an optimality principle. New Phytol 225:2484–2495
Lefohn AS et al (2018) Tropospheric ozone assessment report: Global ozone metrics for climate change, human health, and crop/ecosystem research. Elem Sci Anth 6(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.279
Lee et al (2017) The relationship between SO2 exposure and plant physiology: A mini review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-017-0053-0
Lehmann MM, Goldsmith GR, Schmid L, Gessler A, Saurer M, Siegwolf RTW (2018) The effect of 18O-labelled water vapor on the oxygen isotope ratio of water and assimilates in plants at high humidity. New Phytol 217:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14788
Lenhart K, Behrendt T, Greiner S, Steinkamp J, Well R, Giesemann A, Keppler F (2019) Nitrous oxide effluxes from plants as a potentially important source to the atmosphere. New Phytol 221:1398–1408
Leonardi S, Gentilesca T, Guerrieri R, Rippullone F, Magnani F, Mencuccini M, Noije TV, Borghetti M (2012) Assessing the effects of nitrogen deposition and climate on carbon isotope discrimination and intrinsic water-use efficiency pf angiosperm and conifer trees under rising CO2 conditions. Glob Change Biol 18:2925–2944
Lévesque MR, Siegwolf RTW, Saurer M, Eilmann B, Rigling A (2014) Increased water-use efficiency does not lead to enhanced tree growth under xeric and mesic conditions. New Phytol 203:94–109 https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12772
Linzon SN (1972) Effects of sulphur oxides on vegetation. For Chronicle 48:182–186
Liu X, Zhao L, Voelker SL, Xu G, Zeng X, Zhang X, Zhang L, Sun W, Zhang Q, Wu G, Li X (2018) Warming and CO2 enrichment modified the ecophysiological responses of Dahurian larch and Mongolia pine during the past century in the permafrost region of northeastern China. Tree Physiol 39:88–103
Maier-Maercker U, Koch W (1995) Poor stomatal control of water-balance and the abscission of green needles from a declining stand of spruce trees (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) from the northern Alps. Trees Struct Funct 10:63–73
Marchand W, Girardin MP, Hartmann H, Depardieu C, Isabel N, Gauthier S, Boucher E, Bergeron Y (2020) Strong overestimation of water-use efficiency responses to rising CO2 in tree-ring studies. Glob Change Biol 26:4538–4558
Martin B, Bytnerowicz A, Thorstenson YR (1988) Effects of air-pollutants on the composition of stable carbon isotopes, 13C, of leaves and wood, and on leaf injury. Plant Physiol 88:218–223
Martin B, Sutherland EK (1990) Air pollution in the past recorded in width and composition of stable carbon isotopes of annual growth rings of Douglas-fir. Plant Cell Environ 13:839–3844
Mathias JM, Thomas RB (2018) Disentangling the effects of acidic air pollution, atmospheric CO2, and climate change on recent growth of red spruce trees in the Central Appalachian Mountains. Global Change Biology: 3938–3953
Matyssek R, Maurer S, Gunthardt-Goerg MS, Landolt W, Saurer M, Polle A (1997) Nutrition determines the ‘strategy’ of Betula pendula for coping with ozone stress. Phyton-Ann Rei Bot A 37:157–167
Matyssek R, Sandermann H (2003) Impact of ozone on trees: an ecophysiological perspective. Progr Bot 64(64):349–404
Matyssek R, Sandermann H, Wieser G, Booker F, Cieslik S, Musselman R, Ernst D (2008) The challenge of making ozone risk assessment for forest trees more mechanistic. Environ Pollut 156:567–582
Matyssek R, Wieser G, Calfapietra C, de Vries W, Dizengremel P, Ernst D, Jolivet Y, Mikkelsen TN, Mohren GMJ, Le Thiec D, Tuovinen JP, Weatherall A, Paoletti E (2012) Forests under climate change and air pollution: gaps in understanding and future directions for research. Environ Pollut 160:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.07.007
Matyssek R, Wieser G, Ceulemans R, Rennenberg H, Pretzsch H, Haberer K, Low M, Nunn AJ, Werner H, Wipfler P, Osswaldg W, Nikolova P, Hanke DE, Kraigher H, Tausz M, Bahnweg G, Kitao M, Dieler J, Sandermann H, Herbinger K, Grebenc T, Blumenrother M, Deckmyn G, Grams TEE, Heerdt C, Leuchner M, Fabian P, Haberle KH (2010) Enhanced ozone strongly reduces carbon sink strength of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica)—resume from the free-air fumiga- tion study at Kranzberg Forest. Environ Pollut 158:2527–2532. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Envpol.2010.05.009
McLaughlin SB (1985) Effects of air-pollution on forests - a critical-review. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 35:512–534
Meng FR, Bourque CPA, Belczewski RF, Whitney NJ, Arp PA (1995) Foliage responses of spruce trees to long-term low-grade sulfur dioxide deposition. Environ Pollut 90:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(94)00101-I
Mills G, Pleijel H, Malley CS, Sinha B, Cooper OR, Schultz MG, Neufeld HS, Simpson D, Sharps K, Feng Z, Gerosa G, Harmens H, Kobayashi K, Saxena P, Paoletti E, Sinha V, Xu X (2018) Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day tropospheric ozone distribution and trends relevant to vegetation. Elem Sci Anth 6(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.302
Millard P, Grelet G (2010) Nitrogen storage and remobilization by trees: ecophysiological relevance in a changing world. Tree Physiology, 30(9):1083–1095. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpq042
Muzika RM, Guyette RP, Zielonka T, Liebhold AM (2004) The influence of O3, NO2, and SO2 on growth of Picea abies and Fagus sylvatica in the Carpathian Mountains. Environmental Pollution 130: 65–71
Neubert A, Kley D, Wildt J, Segschneider HJ, Förstel H (1993) Uptake of NO, NO2 and O3 by sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum L.): dependence on stomatal conductivity. Atmospheric Environ-Ment 27A:2137–2145
Nikolova PS, Andersen CP, Blaschke H, Matyssek R, Haeberle K-H (2010) Belowground effects of enhanced tropospheric ozone and drought in a beech/spruce forest (Fagus sylvatica L./Picea abies [L.] Karst). Environ Pollut 158:1071–1078
Norby RJ, De Kauwe MG, Domingues TF, Duursma RA, Ellsworth DS, Goll DS, Lapola DM, Luus KA, Mackenzie AR, Medlyn BE, Pavlick R, Rammig A, Smith B, Thomas R, Thonicke K, Walker AP, Yang X, Zaehle S (2016) Model-data synthesis for the next generation of forest free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. New Phytol 209:17–28
Norby RJ (1998) Nitrogen deposition: a component of global change analyses. New Phytol 139:189–200
Nussbaum SV, Ballmoos P, Gfeller H, Schlunegger UP, Fuhrer J, Rhodes D, Brunold C (1993) Incorporation of atmospheric 15NO2-nitrogen into free amino acids by Norway spruce Picea abies (L.) Karst. Oecologia 94:408–414
Ooi L, Matsuura T, Munemasa S, Murata Y, Katsuhara M, Hirayama T, Mori IC (2019) The mechanism of SO2-induced stomatal closure differs from O3 and CO2 responses and is mediated by nonapoptotic cell death in guard cells. Plant Cell Environ 42:437–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13406
Paoletti E, Grulke NE (2010) Ozone exposure and stomatal sluggishness in different plant physiognomic classes. Environ Pollut 158:2664–2671
Paoletti E, Grulke NE, Matyssek R (2020) Ozone amplifies water loss from mature trees in the short term but decreases it in the long term. Forests 11(1), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010046
Parry MAJ, Gutteridge S (1984) The effect of SO32- and SO42- ions on the reactions of ribulose biophosphate carboxylase. J Exp Bot 35:157–168
Patterson MJ, Rundel PW (1993) Carbon Isotope discrimination and gas exchange in Ozone sensitive and resistant Populations of Jeffery Pine. In: Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farquhar GD (eds) Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 227–244
Pearson J, Soares S (1998) Physiological response of plant leaves to atmospheric ammonia and ammonium. Atm. Environ 32:533–538
Peñuelas J, Canadell JG, Ogaya R (2011) Increased water-use efficiency during the 20th century did not translate into enhanced tree growth. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:597–608
Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ, King JS, Zak DR (2008) Soil respiration, root biomass, and root turnover following long-term exposure of northern forests to elevated atmospheric CO2 and tropospheric O3. New Phytol 180:153–161
Ramge P, Badeck FW, Plöchl M, Kohlmaier GH (1993) Apoplastic antioxidants as decisive elimination factors within the uptake of nitrogen dioxide into leaf tissue. New Phytol 125:771–785
Randewig D, Hamisch D, Herschbach C, Eiblmeier M, Gehl C, Jurgeleit J, Skerra J, Rr M, Rennenberg H, Hänsch R (2012) Sulfite oxidase controls sulfur metabolism under SO2 exposure in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ 35:100–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02420.x
Rannik U, Altimir N, Mammarella I, Back J, Rinne J, Ruuskanen TM, Hari P, Vesala T, Kulmala M (2012) Ozone deposition into a boreal forest over a decade of observations: evaluating deposition partitioning and driving variables. Atmos Chem Phys 12:12165–12182. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12165-2012
Rennenberg H, Geßler A (1999) Consequences of N deposition to forest ecosystems – recent results and future research needs. Water Air Soil Pollut 116:47–64
Rinne KT, Loader NJ, Switsur VR, Treydte KS, Waterhouse JS (2010) Investigating the influence of sulphur dioxide (SO2) on the stable isotope ratios (δ13C and δ18O) of tree rings. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:2327–2339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.01.021
Ritter W, Andersen CP, Matyssek R, Grams TEE (2011) Carbon flux to woody tissues in a beech/spruce forest during summer and in response to chronic O3 exposure. Biogeosciences 8:3127–3138
Roden JS, Ehleringer JR (1999) Observations of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in leaf water confirm the Craig-Gordon model under wide-ranging environmental conditions. Plant Physiol 120:1165–1173
Roden JS, Bowling DR, McDowell NG, Bond BJ, Ehleringer JR (2005) Carbon and oxygen isotope ratios of tree ring cel- lulose along a precipitation transect in Oregon United States. J Geophys Res 110:G02003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JG000033
Royal Society (2008) Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, impacts and policy implications.132 pp. Science Policy report 15/08. Royal Society, London
Rozanski K, Araguas-Araguas L, Gonfiantini (1993) Isotopic patterns in modern global precipitation: Cont Isot Indic Clim, American Geophysical Union Monograph
Sage RF, Sharkey TD, Seemann JR (1989) Acclimation of Photosynthesis to Elevated CO2 in Five C3 Species. Plant Physiol 89:590–596
Sage RF, Pearcy RW (1987) The nitrogen use efficiency of C3 and C4 plants. II. Leaf nitrogen effects on the gas exchange characteristics of Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroroflexus (L.). Plant Physiol 84:959–963
Sakata M, Suzuki K (2000) Evaluating possible causes for the decline of Japanese fir (Abies firma) forests based on δ13C records of annual growth rings. Environ Sci Technol 34:373e376
Sandermann H, Ernst D, Heller W, Langebartels C (1998) Ozone: an abiotic elicitor of plant defence reactions. Trends Plant Sci 3:47–50
Saurer M, Fuhrer J, Siegenthaler U (1991) Influence of ozone on the stable carbon isotope composition, δ13C, of leaves and grain of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Plant Physiol 97:313–316
Saurer M, Maurer S, Matyssek R, Landolt W, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Siegenthaler U (1995) The influence of ozone and nutrition on 13C in Betula pendula. Oecologia 103:397–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00328677
Saurer M, Siegwolf RTW (2007) human impacts on tree-ring growth reconstructed from stable isotopes. IIn: Dawson T, Siegwolf R (eds) Stable isotopes as indicators of ecological change. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 49–62
Saurer M, Cherubini P, Ammann M, De Cinti B, Siegwolf RTW (2004) First detection of nitrogen from NOx in tree rings: a 15N/14N study near a motorway. Atmos Environ 38:2779–2787
Saurer M, Spahni R, Frank DC, Joos F, Leuenberger M, Loader NJ, McCarroll D, Gagen M, Poulter B, Siegwolf RTW, Andreu-Hayles L, Boettger T, Liñán ID, Fairchild IJ, Friedrich M, Gutierrez E, Haupt M, Hilasvuori E, Heinrich I, Helle G, Grudd H, Jalkanen R, Levanič T, Linderholm HW, Robertson I, Sonninen E, Treydte K, Waterhouse JS, Woodley EJ, Wynn PM, Young GHF (2014) Spatial variability and temporal trends in water-use efficiency of European forests. Glob Change Biol 20:3700–3712
Savard MM, Begin C, Parent M, Smirnoff A, Marion J (2004) Effects of smelter sulfur dioxide emissions: A spatiotemporal perspective using carbon isotopes in tree rings. J Environ Qual 33:13–26. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2004.0013
Savard MM, Bégin C, Smirnoff A, Marion J, Sharp Z, Parent M (2005) Fractionation change of hydrogen isotopes in trees due to atmospheric pollutants. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:3723–3731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2005.03.046
Savard MM, Bégin C, Marion J (2020a) Response strategies of boreal spruce trees to anthropogenic changes in air quality and rising pCO2. Environm Poll 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114209
Savard MM, Marion J, Bégin C (2020b) Nitrogen isotopes of individual tree-ring series–The validity of middle- to long-term trends. Dendrochronologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2020.125726
Savard MM, Bégin C, Laganière J, Martineau C, Marion J, Stefani, FOP, Séguin A, Smirnoff A, Bergeron J, Morency MJ, Paré D (2019) Anthropogenic N – a global issue examined at regional scale from soils, to fungi, roots and tree rings. E3S Web Conf. 98
Savard MM, Bégin C, Smirnoff A (2009) Marion J (2009) Tree-ring nitrogen isotopes reflect anthropogenic NOx emissions and climatic effects. Environ Sci Technol 43:604–609
Savard MM, Cole A, Smirnoff A, Vet R (2017) δ15N values of atmospheric N species simultaneously collected using sector-based samplers distant from sources – isotopic inheritance and fractionation. Atmos Environ 162:11–22
Savard MM (2010) Tree-ring stable isotopes and historical perspectives on pollution–An overview. Environ Pollut 158(6):2007–2013
Scheidegger Y, Saurer M, Bahn M, Siegwolf R (2000) Linking stable oxygen and carbon isotopes with stomatal conductance and photosynthetic capacity: a conceptual model. Oecologia 125:350–357
Schubert BA, Jahren AH (2018) Incorporating the effects of photorespiration intro terrestrial paleoclimate reconstruction. Earth Sci Rev 177:637–642
Segschneider HJ, Wildt J, Förstel H (1995) Uptake of 15NO2 by sunflower (Helianthus annuus) during exposures in light and darkness: quantities, relationship to stomatal aperture and incorporation into different nitrogen pools within the plant. New Phytol 131:109–119
Sensula B, Wilczynski S (2017) Climatic signals in tree-ring width and stable isotopes composition of Pinus sylvestris L. growing in the industrialized area nearby Kedzierzyn-Kozle. Geochronometria 44:240–255. https://doi.org/10.1515/geochr-2015-0070
Sidorova OV, Fonti MV, Saurer M, Guillet S, Ch, Corona, Fonti P, Myglan VS, Kirdyanov AV, Naumova OV, Ovchinnikov DV, Shashkin AV, Panyushkina P, Buntgen U, Hughes MK, Vaganov EA, Siegwolf RTW, Stoffel M (2019) Siberian tree-ring and stable isotope proxies as indicators of temperature and moisture changes after major stratospheric volcanic eruptions. Clim Past 15(2):685–700
Siegwolf RTW, Matyssek R, Saurer M, Maurer S, Gunthardt-Goerg MS, Schmutz P, Bucher JB (2001) Stable isotope analysis reveals differential effects of soil nitrogen and nitrogen dioxide on the water use efficiency in hybrid poplar leaves. New Phytol 149:233–246
Slovik S, Siegmund A, Fuhrer HW, Heber U (1996) Stomatal uptake of SO2, NOx and O3 by spruce crowns (Picea abies) and canopy damage in Central Europe. New Phytol 132:661–676
Sparks JP (2009) Ecological ramifications of the direct foliar uptake of nitrogen. Oecologia 159:1–13
Sperry JS, Venturas MD, Todd HN, Trugman AT, Anderegg WRL, Wang Y, Tai X (2019) The impact of rising CO2 and acclimation on the response of US forests to global warming. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 116:25734–25744
Sprenger M, Tetzlaff D, Buttle J et al (2018) Storage, mixing, and fluxes of water in the critical zone across northern environments inferred by stable isotopes of soil water. Hydrol Process 32:1720–1737. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13135
Sternberg L (2009) Oxygen stable isotope ratios of tree-ring cellulose: the next phase of understanding. New Phytol 181:553–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02661.x
Streit K, Siegwolf RTW, Hagedorn F, Schaub M, Buchmann N (2014) Lack of photosynthetic or stomatal regulation after 9 years of elevated CO2 and 4 years of soil warming in two conifer species at the alpine treeline. Plant Cell Environ 37:315–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12197
Sun F, Kuang Y, Wen D, Xu Z, Li J, Zuo W, Hou E (2010) Long-term tree growth rate, water use efficiency, and tree ring nitrogen isotope composition of Pinus massoniana L. in response to global climate change and local nitrogen deposition in Southern China. J Soils Sediments 10:1453–1465
Szejner P, Wright WE, Belmecheri S, Meko D, Leavitt SW, Ehleringer JR, Monson RK (2018) Disentangling season and interannual legacies from inferred patterns of water and carbon cycling using tree-ring stable isotopes. Glob Change Biol 24:5332–5347
Tarasick D et al (2019) Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Tropospheric ozone from 1877 to 2016, observed levels, trends and uncertainties. Elem Sci Anth 7(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.376
Tcherkez G (2011) Natural 15N/14N isotope composition in C3 leaves: are enzymatic isotope effects informative for predicting the 15N-abundance in key metabolites? Funct Plant Biol 38:1–12
Teklemariam TA, Sparks JP (2006) Leaf fluxes of NO and NO2 in four herbaceous plant species: The role of ascorbic acid. Atmospheric Environment 40:2235–2244
Thoene B, Rennenberg H, Weber P (1996) Absorption of atmospheric NO2 by spruce (Picea abies) trees. II. Parameterization of NO2 fluxes by controlled dynamic chamber experiments. New Phytol 134:257–266
Thomas RQ, Brookshire ENJ, Gerber S (2015) Nitrogen limitation on land: how can it occur in Earth system models? Glob Change Biol 21:1777–1793. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12813
Tomlinson G, Siegwolf RTW, Buchmann N, Schleppi P, Waldner P, Weber P (2014) The mobility of nitrogen across tree-rings of Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) and the effect of extraction method on tree-ring 15N and 13C values. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 28(11):1258–1264
Treydte KS, Frank DC, Saurer M, Helle G, Schleser GH, Esper J (2009) Impact of climate and CO2 on a millennium- long tree-ring carbon isotope record. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 73:4635–4647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.05.057
Seibt U, Rajabi A, Griffiths H, Berry JA (2008) Carbon isotopes and water use efficiency: sense and sensitivity. Oecologia 155(3):441–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0932-7
Vallano D, Sparks JP (2007) Foliar δ15N values as indicators of foliar uptake of atmospheric nitrogen pollution. In: Dawson T, Siegwolf R (eds) Stable isotopes as indicators of ecological change. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 93–109
Vallano D, Sparks JP (2013) Foliar δ15N is affected by foliar nitrogen uptake, soil nitrogen, and mycorrhizae along a nitrogen deposition gradient. Oecologia 172:47–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2489-3
Van der Eerden LJ, De Visser P, Perez-Soba M (1998) Urban and agricultural nitrogen deposition: are there differences in impact? In: De Kok LJ, Stulen I (eds) Responses of plant metabolism to air pollution and global change. Backhuys, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 469–471
Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW et al (1997) Human alteration of global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–750
Voelker SL, Meinzer FC (2017) Where and when does stem cellulose δ18O reflect a leaf water enrichment signal? Tree Physiol 37:551–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx029
Voelker SL, Merschel AG, Meinzer FC, Still CJ, Ulrich DE, Spies TA (2019) Fire deficits have increased drought-sensitivity in dry conifer forests; fire frequency and tree-ring carbon isotope evidence from Central Oregon. Glob Change Biol 25:1247–1262
Voelker SL et al (2016) A dynamic leaf gas-exchange strategy is conserved in woody plants under changing ambient CO2: evidence from carbon isotope discrimination in paleo and CO2 enrichment studies. Glob Change Biol 22(2):889–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13102
Vogel JC (1993) Variability of Carbon Isotope Fractionation during Photosynthesis. Stable Isotopes and Plant Carbon-water Relations. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 29–46
Wagner R, Wagner E (2006) Influence of air pollution and site conditions on trends of carbon and oxygen isotope ratios in tree ring cellulose. Isot Environ Health Stud 42:351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010600991078
Waldner P et al (2014) Detection of temporal trends in atmopsheric deposition of inorganic nitrogen and sulphate to forests in Europe. Atmos Environ 95:363–374
Walker AP et al (2020) Tansley Review: Integrating evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO2. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16866
Wedler M, Weikert RM, Lippert M (1995) Photosynthetic performance, chloroplast pigments and mineral content of Norway spruce {Picea abies (L.) Karst.) exposed to SO2 and O3 in an open- air fumigation experiment. Plant Cell Environ 18:263–276
Wehr R, Commane R, Munger JW, McManus JB, Nelson DD, Zahniser MS, Saleska SR, Wofsy SC (2017) Dynamics of canopy stomatal conductance, transpiration, and evaporation in a temperate deciduous forest, validated by carbonyl sulfide uptake. Biogeosciences 14:389–401
Weigt RB, Bräunlich S, Zimmermann L, Saurer M, Grams TEE, Dietrich HP, Siegwolf RTW, Nikolova PS (2015) Comparison of δ18O and δ13C between tree-ring whole wood and cellulose in five species growing under two different site conditions. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 29:2233–2244
Wellburn AR (1990) Why are atmopsheric oxides of nitrogen usually phytotoxic and not alternative fertilizers. New Phytol 115:395–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00467.x
Wieser G, Oberhuber W, Waldboth B, Gruber A, Matyssek R, Siegwolf RTW, Grams TEE (2018) Long-term trends in leaf level gas exchange mirror tree-ring derived intrinsic water-use efficiency of Pinus cembra at tree line during the last century. Agric for Meteorol 248:251–258
Wittig VE, Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2007) To what extent do current and projected increases in surface ozone affect photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of trees? A meta-analytic review of the last 3 decades of experiments. Plant Cell Environ 30:1150–1162
Wittig VE, Ainsworth EA, Naidu SL, Karnosky DF, Long SP (2009) Quantifying the impact of current and future tropospheric ozone on tree biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry: a quantitative meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol 15:396–424
Woodley EJ, Loader NJ, McCarroll D, Young GHF, Robertson I, Gagen MH, Warham MH (2012) High-temperature pyrolysis/gas chromatography/isotope ratio mass spectrometry: simultaneous measurement of the stable isotopes of oxygen and carbon in cellulose. Rapid Commun Mass Spectreometry 26:109–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.5302
Xu YS, Shang B, Yuan XY, Feng ZZ, Calatayud V (2018) Relationships of CO2 assimilation rates with exposure- and flux-based O3 metrics in three urban tree species. Sci Total Environ 613:233–239
Yamulki S, Harrison RM, Goulding KWT (1996) Ammonia surface exchange above an agricultural field in southeast England. Atmos Environ 30:109–118
Ziegler I (1972) The effect of SO32− on the activity of RuBP carboxylase in isolated spinach chloroplasts. Planta 103:155–163
Zweifel R, Steppe K, Sterck FJ (2007) Stomatal regulation by microclimate and tree water relations: interpreting ecophysiological field data with a hydraulic plant model. J Exp Bot 58(8):2113–2131. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm050
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 © The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siegwolf, R.T.W., Savard, M.M., Grams, T.E.E., Voelker, S. (2022). Impact of Increasing CO2, and Air Pollutants (NOx, SO2, O3) on the Stable Isotope Ratios in Tree Rings. In: Siegwolf, R.T.W., Brooks, J.R., Roden, J., Saurer, M. (eds) Stable Isotopes in Tree Rings. Tree Physiology, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92698-4_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92698-4_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92697-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92698-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)