Abstract
Depending on the extract, it is necessary to modify the purification protocol slightly. Each sample is different and despite a thorough testing of the purification protocol, issues might occur. The three modifications suggested include (1) adjustments in pH, (2) magnesium ammonium phosphate (MAP) precipitation and (3) reductions, prior to A1, of cations like iron (Fe), silica (Si) and calcium (Ca) which could cause interferences during the purification process. Some of the major issues often encountered are (1) no APM precipitation due to the presence of high carbonate concentrations, (2) the presence of high organic matter that requires additional steps in the protocol, (3) crystals not dissolving and (4) discoloration of solution.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
4.1 Method Modifications During the Purification Process
The original purification protocol is using 1 M HCl extracts but it is nowadays used for a diverse set of extracts (Tamburini et al. 2010, 2018; Pistocchi et al. 2017; Granger et al. 2018; Pfahler et al. 2020). Depending on the extract it is necessary to modify the purification protocol slightly. Also, each sample is different and despite thorough testing of the purification protocol, issues might occur.
4.1.1 Modification 1
The ideal pH for the precipitation of ammonium phosphomolybdate (APM; step A1 of purification protocol) is 1. When using acidic reagents that are weaker than 1 M HCl, for example, 0.2 M HNO3 for eluting resin P, it is therefore necessary to add concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4). Concentrated H2SO4 is a strong acid that could potentially hydrolyse any organic or condensed P present in the extract. Add concentrated H2SO4 slowly to the sample only after ammonium molybdate and ammonium nitrate are added to the extract in step A1 of the purification protocol. Usually, 1 ml concentrated H2SO4 is sufficient to facilitate the precipitation of APM.
4.1.2 Modification 2
If the initial extract, e.g., 0.5 M NaHCO3, has an alkaline pH, start with step A2 to avoid unnecessary pH adjustment. Indeed, step A2 of the purification protocol (magnesium ammonium phosphate (MAP) precipitation) requires an alkaline pH (>7). In these cases, the crystals obtained from the MAP step are never properly clean. So, after the dissolution of the MAP crystals, proceed with step A1, repeat step A2 and continue with the remaining steps.
4.1.3 Modification 3
Certain cations like iron (Fe), silica (Si) and calcium (Ca) can interfere with the purification protocol and therefore their concentrations need to be reduced prior to Step A1. High concentrations of Si can be present in volcanic soils and can interfere with the molybdate complexation in step A1 of the purification protocol. Ca can also interfere in step A1 due to the formation of crystals with molybdate. Fe could form colloids and co-precipitated with organic P. Brucite precipitation should be added before step A1 to reduce the concentrations of interfering cations. Alternatively, cation exchange resins could help in reducing the cation concentrations; however, this has, to the best of our knowledge, not yet been tested in case of the purification protocol.
4.2 Major Issues
4.2.1 Issue 1: No APM Precipitation
This is often the case when the initial extract is not acidic enough. In most cases modification 1 will help. In the presence of high carbonate concentrations, even the 1 M HCl extract might not be acidic enough (Pistocchi et al. 2017). Pistocchi et al. (2017) therefore adjusted the liquid-to-solid ratio for their samples during the extraction to 100:1 instead of 50:1. Too low P concentrations (<10 µmol) can also be a reason for no APM precipitation. In that case, the sample needs to be extracted again and a higher amount of material needs to be used. In this case, it is possible that multiple subsamples are extracted and then the extracts are combined. A brucite step is most likely needed in order to reduce the extract volume prior to APM precipitation.
4.2.2 Issue 2: High Organic Matter
In most cases, for example with low organic matter but high inorganic P concentrations, steps A1 and A2 are sufficient to remove organic matter from the initial extracts. Sometimes steps A1 and A2 are not sufficient and it is necessary to use the DAX-8 resin or brucite precipitation before proceeding with the purification protocol. Organic matter or colouration is also an issue in Olsen P extracts and charcoal is used to deal with this issue. However, charcoal is often contaminated with P and hence not ideal for the δ18OP method, unless acid cleaned and checked for P.
For conditioning the DAX-8 resin, proceed as follows: Take the equivalent of 10 ml of resin per sample and place it in a 500 ml plastic bottle. To condition the new resin, use 1.5 bed volumes (BV) of methanol, shake well, and let rest for 15 min. Discard methanol, rinse with 1.5 BV of ultrapure water, shake and let rest for 15 min. Carefully discard water. Add ultrapure water just to cover the surface of the resin. After use, the resin should be collected and washed with 1 M HCl + methanol. Store in methanol and at room temperature.
4.2.3 Issue 3: Crystals not Dissolving and Discolouration of Solution
Sometimes the ammonium phosphomolybdate (APM), which formed during step A1, does not dissolve immediately in the ammonium citrate solution (step A2). In this case, leave the solution for about 1 h and if it did not dissolve by then, filter it before continuing with the remaining parts of step A2. Likewise, magnesium ammonium phosphate (MAP), which formed during step A2, does not dissolve immediately when adding 0.5 M HNO3. Leave the solution for one hour; if not dissolved by then, filter the solution.
Another issue, which might occur, is the discolouration of the solution (Fig. 4.1). Dissolved APM and MAP should yield clear solutions. Filtering the solutions prior to continuing with the respective step (A2 or A3), usually reduces the discolouration.
References
Granger SJ, Yang Y, Pfahler V et al (2018) The stable oxygen isotope ratio of resin extractable phosphate derived from fresh cattle faeces. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 32:703–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8092
Pfahler V, Bielnicka A, Smith AC et al (2020) A rapid ammonium fluoride method to determine the oxygen isotope ratio of available phosphorus in tropical soils. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8647
Pistocchi C, Tamburini F, Gruau G et al (2017) Tracing the sources and cycling of phosphorus in river sediments using oxygen isotopes: methodological adaptations and first results from a case study in France. Water Res 111:346–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.12.038
Tamburini F, Bernasconi SM, Angert A et al (2010) A method for the analysis of the δ18O of inorganic phosphate extracted from soils with HCl. Eur J Soil Sci 61:1025–1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01290.x
Tamburini F, Pistocchi C, Helfenstein J, Frossard E (2018) A method to analyse the isotopic composition of oxygen associated with organic phosphorus in soil and plant material. Eur J Soil Sci 69:816–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12693
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Glossary
- Brucite precipitation
-
Brucite precipitation, also referred to as MAGIC (magnesium induced co-precipitation), is used to concentrate P in a solution, e.g., water sample. By adding magnesium chloride and sodium hydroxide to a solution brucite flocs (Mg(OH)2) precipitate and thereby P is stripped out from a solution.
- Olsen P
-
The Olsen P method is one of the extraction methods for available P in soils. 0.5 M sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) is used as an extractant.
Rights and permissions
The opinions expressed in this chapter are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the [NameOfOrganization], its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the [NameOfOrganization], provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
Any dispute related to the use of the works of the [NameOfOrganization] that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the [NameOfOrganization]'s name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of the [NameOfOrganization]'s logo, shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the [NameOfOrganization] and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC-IGO license. Note that the link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pfahler, V., Adu-Gyamfi, J., Watzinger, A., Tamburini, F. (2022). Modifications and Issues During Purification. In: Adu-Gyamfi, J., Pfahler, V. (eds) Oxygen Isotopes of Inorganic Phosphate in Environmental Samples. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97497-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97497-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97496-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97497-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)