Abstract
In rapidly transforming Asian environments, traditional agricultural heritage systems struggle with increasing development pressure and out-migration. Drawing on the Chinese cultural landscape of the Honghe Hani Rice Terraces as a case study, the paper investigates how the concepts of scale and “politics of scale” can be fruitfully mobilised for critical heritage theory and provide practical solutions to overcome conservation–development tensions. In processes of ethnic tourism development and cultural commodification, government authorities pursue different scalar strategies to harness natural and cultural resources for heritage-led regeneration schemes. Such strongly tourism-oriented agendas, as prevailed in the initial stages of development, privilege natural and selected cultural values over social values, thereby contrasting with local inhabitants’ aspirations to improve their living conditions. To encourage participation and sustainable cultural landscape management, the study suggests “upscaling” traditional knowledge and local interests.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
At the beginning of the 1970s, a decade of professional debates, mobilisation and institutional rivalries crystallised in an unprecedented form of international cooperation to safeguard places and sites of outstanding significance across the globe – the World Heritage Convention (UNESCO, 1972). The successful adoption of shared conservation objectives and principles was not least a result of new anthropogenic threats to cultural and natural heritage, such as the often referenced construction of the Aswan Dam in Egypt and potential flooding of the Philae and Abu Simbel temples. Fifty years later, environmental degradation is becoming an ever more pressing risk to heritage on a global scale, exacerbated by unsustainable ways of production and consumption.
Based on conceptualisations put forward in the 1987 Brundtland Report, sustainable development mainly rests on three pillars: economic viability, environmental protection and social equity. Despite initial success in introducing culture into the sustainable development discourse, Agenda 21 for culture (UCLG, 2004) and the Hangzhou Declaration (UNESCO, 2013) in particular, its integration into practical planning and decision making has remained limited (Throsby, 2017, 141). However, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) primarily acknowledge culture, cultural heritage and creativity as drivers and enablers for achieving these goals (Hosagrahar, 2017). This central role of culture as a fourth dimension becomes evident in agricultural landscapes where local ethnic communities live in an intimate relationship with their environment.
2 The Honghe Hani Rice Terraces
A remarkable and particularly noteworthy example of such a landscape is located between the Ailao Mountains 哀牢山 and the Hong River 红河 in China’s southwestern Yunnan Province. The Honghe Hani Rice Terraces 红河哈尼梯田 that were inscribed as World Heritage cultural landscape in 2013 organically integrate four components: mountaintop forests, rural villages of the Hani ethnic community, rice terraces and a water system. Based on historical accounts in Chinese sources, notably Fan Chuo’s 樊绰 Tang era (618–907) geographical report Man Shu 蛮书 (“Book of the Southern Tribes”, Fan & Oey, 1961, 67), rice terrace agriculture in this area is estimated to date back at least 1000 years. In adaptation to the natural conditions of mountainous terrain and sub-tropical climate, the Hani developed a complex system of irrigated rice terraces on the mountain slopes, making use of shallow groundwater and water storage capacity of mountaintop forests (Jiao & Li, 2011, 33, see Fig. 32.1).
The maintenance of this agricultural land-use system relies on the rich traditional knowledge, also designated as “indigenous knowledge” or “traditional ecological knowledge”, of its local communities. Such knowledge includes indigenous languages, water management systems, customary rules and technical skills. In the integrated farming system of the Hani Terraces, the breeding of ducks, fish and other livestock complements red rice cultivation. This mode of production is further supported by a distinctive social and spiritual system. Modifications of water sources, for example, have traditionally been regulated through customary rules based on consent. Moreover, cosmological conceptualisations of the environment where spirits reside in landscape components, such as streams, trees or caves, and circulate along topographically and hydrographically determined routes (Bouchery, 2011, 332) have contributed to a resource-friendly attitude towards nature.
With increasing globalisation, advantages of this close nature–culture relationship have come under serious threat. A major factor that negatively affects the Hani terrace system is climate change, which has caused severe landslides (Gao et al., 2020, 1916) and water shortages. Especially in Asian developing countries, cultural landscapes are increasingly disappearing as a result of industrialisation and rapid urbanisation (Takeuchi, 2010, 894; Lennon, 2012, 54). Due to demographic changes, not only external factors but also local livelihoods affect the integrity of the terraces: Traditionally, when a terrace system could no longer support a village’s population, the human–land ratio was balanced again by splitting the village and creating another terrace (Jiao & Li, 2011, 36–38). With the introduction of the household responsibility system and strict land delimitation policies in the 1980s, this practice was prohibited, and human settlements became more and more concentrated. With continued population growth on the one hand and land scarcity on the other, cropland per capita dramatically decreased in the Hani villages. As a consequence, rural labourers turn to non-agricultural activities that provide higher income (Zhang et al., 2017) and move to larger urban centres such as the provincial capital Kunming, abandoning their homes and fields.
A popular strategy for poverty reduction in the southwestern Chinese provinces, which has been embraced by the central and local governments alike, is tourism development. The UN has acknowledged tourism’s potential to create jobs and promote local culture and products in its eighth sustainable development goal (SDG 8.9). However, such strategies have proven to be limited in effectiveness if formulated as general political demands, ignoring relevant interests and power constellations (Albert & Ringbeck, 2015, 159).
3 Politics of Scale and Heritage Administration in China
A promising theoretical and methodological approach, which takes the political nature and complex power structures related to heritage into account, is the critical lens of “politics of scale” (Swyngedouw, 1997; Brenner, 2001). The concept of scale in its significance for the production of space was first brought into focus by French philosopher and social theorist Henri Lefebvre (1901–1991). One of its founders, Scottish geographer Neil Smith (1954–2012), conceptualised scales as platforms for social activity and spatial manifestations of power relations which form nested hierarchies (e.g. global, regional, national and local) in capitalist societies (Smith, 2000, 725). As a geographical concept, it triggered a productive debate in the Anglo-American Radical Geography at the beginning of the 1990s, a period of extensive worldwide spatial reconfigurations. Peter Taylor’s (1982) seminal essay and Smith’s (1984) Uneven Development still proceed from a three-tiered scale model (global, national and urban). In the following scale debate, the concept was more precisely defined as being socially constructed rather than natural or given (Herod, 1991; Marston, 2000).
In more recent discussions, the concept has been introduced to additional research fields, such as political ecology (McCarthy, 2005; Köhler, 2008) and heritage studies (Butland, 2012; Lähdesmäki et al., 2019). In the latter, an important strength of scale lies in its consideration of the tangled hierarchies and changing positionalities of cultural heritage production with other forms of sociospatial structuration. While every action is embedded in local contexts, a purely local–local interpretation would risk obscuring differences in access possibilities and interaction spaces of the agents involved (Schmitt, 2011, 88). In the context of Chinese cultural landscapes, relevant sociospatial processes include not only commodification but also the formation of national identity. The following are key questions for a better understanding of such processes: Does a commodification of heritage uphold or reshuffle existing hierarchies in heritage governance? How are social groups empowered/disempowered through an appropriation of traditional knowledge for income generation? How do reconfigurations of heritage management create forms of inclusion/exclusion?
In a globally highly interconnected world, supranational (and subnational) institutions gain importance as regulatory mechanisms in political, environmental, cultural and economic terms because “new forms of institutional organisation, political authority, and economic coordination” are generated “above and below the national scale of state power” (Brenner, 2004, 7). This trend can be well observed in the establishment of the Chinese heritage conservation and administration system. Since its ratification of the World Heritage Convention in 1985, China has become an active applicant for World Heritage inscription of its cultural and natural properties. Apart from a sense of national pride and local patriotism, this great enthusiasm or “world heritage craze” (Gu et al., 2012, 55; Yan, 2018) is nurtured by hopes for economic growth and development. The process of rendering heritage conservation economically feasible comes with significant risks for authenticity and integrity loss. Through the adoption of its own conservation principles in 2000, the China Principles (Zhongguo wenwu guji baohu zhunze 中国文物古迹保护准则), China primarily strives to “downscale” globally established concepts and practices to lower administrative levels (Zhu, 2019, 25), while, at the same time, actively “upscaling” its own key concerns and integrating them into the international heritage discourse.
Within the country, the state has undertaken a number of scale-making processes in the domain of heritage governance, ranging from jurisdictional frameworks to heritage inventories and new administrative mechanisms. In a strictly hierarchical structure of state regulation, the State Administration of Cultural Heritage 国家文物局 heads subordinate heritage departments on lower scales (provincial, prefectural, municipal, county). Equivalent to the World Heritage nomination process, Chinese cultural relic entities (wenwu baohu danwei 文物保护单位) must follow a hierarchical nomination process from one administrative scale to another. Based on this rigid administrative structure, sites can be upscaled or downscaled or their title revoked in designation rounds (Wallenwein, 2020, 259). It is precisely in this process of surveying, recording and conserving that heritage acquires symbolic value and becomes “amenable to commodification” (Kowalski, 2011, 87). The following section explores how scalar strategies can be and are already utilised by different agents to consolidate, shift or challenge existing power relations in the transformation and regulation of heritage.
4 National and Regional Scalar Strategies
The commodification of heritage and, notably, tourism development in the Hani Terraces is deeply entangled with policy objectives and personal aspirations on different scalar levels. In its long-term struggle to reduce poverty, the Chinese central government launched a number of campaigns such as “Open up the West” (Xibu da kaifa 西部大开发) at the turn of the millennium to narrow the gap between developed coastal regions and rural areas of the western interior. Besides fostering endogenous economic development and social stability, related policy objectives are to strengthen state capacity and nation-building (Goodman, 2004, 317). Ethnic tourism development enables the state to economically integrate minority groups while simultaneously implementing its cultural policies (Zhu, 2018, 20–21). The strictly hierarchical administrative system of heritage in China further allows central government agencies to “downscale” their value systems to heritage institutions on regional and local scales, enabling the cultivation of selected aspects of ethnic identity.
One aspect that may lead to conflicts with the local population is the question of how to deal with traditional residential buildings, some of which are dilapidated and in bad condition. In their attempt to develop cultural tourism, authorities aim to produce a homogenous landscape of traditional “mushroom houses” (local dwelling resembling a mushroom in shape) that reflect local cultural characteristics as they are widely known through touristic marketing. Homeowners, on the other hand, are striving to improve their living conditions, transform or even abandon their houses, as in the case of Azheke 阿者科 village, after having generated sufficient income (Zhang & Stewart, 2017, 43). Other such aspects of Hani culture include traditional folk songs and dances, as well as rituals and customs related to terrace cultivation. This intangible cultural heritage, as well as its transmitters, has been meticulously listed on different administrative levels.
At a regional scale, Honghe Prefectural Government strives to exert influence and accumulate resources via integrating the terrace landscape into institutional structures across different policy fields. Primarily, the decision to adopt a tourism-based development strategy was coupled with the promotion of the Hani Rice Terraces as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. For better protection of the terraces, which is also a requirement for World Heritage listing, the prefectural government has adopted provisional management measures and a master plan since 2001, set up the Hani Terrace Authority in 2007 and established regulatory agencies at the county level one year later (FAO, 2010). With successful World Heritage designation, such newly established heritage departments move up the institutional scale, acquiring further administrative functions and funding (Zhu, 2019, 31). Moreover, the Prefecture Government made efforts to “upscale” the Hani Rice Terraces in the closely related fields of forestry and agriculture. In 2007, the State Forestry Administration approved parts of the terraces as a National Wetland Park, and they were inscribed as a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System (GIAHS) pilot site in 2010 (Gu et al., 2012, 55). This integration of the landscape into further national and global-scale environmental programmes and the marketing of corresponding titles foster the establishment of a strong tourism brand and a competitive advantage, considering the number of outstanding scenic areas in Yunnan Province.
5 Local Scalar Strategies
With China’s introduction of market-oriented reforms and fiscal decentralisation at the beginning of the 1980s, state officials on local scales received new incentives to engage in profit-seeking economic activities and act as “state entrepreneurs” (Duckett, 2001). Following established practices to draw on heritage as a tool for “improvement” (Oakes, 2013), Yuanyang 元阳 County adopted a government-led approach for cultural tourism development. This decision and its accompanying process of cultural commodification created and still creates tensions between desired economic benefits and transformations of local culture and heritage.
Controversial measures as they appeared in the early stages of tourism development in the terraces included the erection of totem poles, which are not part of Hani culture, and regular ethnic cultural performances (Gu et al., 2012, 56). In his study on social spaces in tourist settings, MacCannell (1973) has explained similar phenomena with touristic attitudes and their “quest for authentic experiences”, which makes them susceptible to settings of “staged authenticity”. More recent studies of ethnic tourism have questioned ideas of touristic performances as mere reductions of culture to its exchange value and see marketed cultural enactments as social practices, bearing great potential for refiguring and reclaiming ethnic identity (Cohen, 1988, 380; Bruner, 2004, 7; Comaroff & Comaroff, 2009, 27).
Natural resources embodying cultural meaning can also become objects of dispute. In the Hani Terraces, the commodification of a forest with high spiritual significance triggered a conflict between the local government, Yuanyang County’s tourism bureau and residents. Led by objectives to satisfy the tourist gaze (Urry, 1990), the tourism bureau built a footpath across this forest in the northwest of Qingkou 箐口 hamlet, one of the earliest and central touristic areas. To express their opposition, residents blocked the footpath that disturbed ancestors’ resting places and violated local spiritual traditions (Gu et al., 2012, 57–58). The importance of social struggles for the production of scale has already been demonstrated for different contexts (e.g. US labour relations, see Herod, 1991) in the 1990s scale debate. By blocking the footpath, local inhabitants mobilised themselves and reached out to higher scales where conservation of intangible heritage is a priority policy goal. By expanding their “space of engagement”, they strengthened their position as custodians of heritage in their “space of dependence” (Cox, 1998).
Most conflicts in the terraces, however, are related to water as a highly limited resource. As public tap water supply is insufficient to meet the demands of both local communities and rapidly expanding tourism facilities, natural water sources are fiercely contested. In 2016, local farmers of the Yi ethnic group’s Shengcun 胜村 hamlet cut down water pipes to hotels, which drew water from the main water source for irrigating their terraces. Although the reasons for water scarcity are natural as well as anthropogenic, local communities hold tourism development responsible for the decline in water resources (Hua et al., 2018, 10).
Finally, on a horizontal scale, new agents such as migrant businesspeople participate in tourism-related activities. With strong profit-oriented objectives, this social group migrates to locations highly frequented by tourists for selling related products or services. As shown in previous studies, this phenomenon is not exclusive to the Hani Terraces but also evokes sharp local–migrant tensions at the World Heritage Town of Lijiang in the north-western part of Yunnan Province, where businesspeople skimmed off tourism-generated revenues to a significant extent (Su, 2013).
6 Upscaling
In this complex situation of competing agents and interests, one opportunity to avoid or at least curb exploitative forms of commodification is to initiate upscaling processes of traditional knowledge and local interests. In earlier preservation projects of inhabited Chinese landscapes, human agricultural activity was considered harmful to nature, and, not infrequently, inhabitants were resettled (Han, 2018, 71). At least partly, this one-sided protection of natural values was related to efforts for World Natural Heritage inscription and ecotourism development. In the case of the Hani Rice Terraces cultural landscape, social and cultural values have been more strongly considered, and customary law has been included in the conservation scheme as one form of local traditional knowledge to be protected.
According to traditional management, the terraces are irrigated with spring water diverted from mountain streams and channelled to the pond fields. Water allocation is managed collectively, monitored by a village-elected specialist (laoga-laepha), and manipulations are punished with fines (Bouchery, 2011, 328ff). While some particular spiritual and cultural practices of the Hani ethnic minority have fallen victim to the Cultural Revolution, customary rules for resource management seem to have been more resilient (Xu et al., 1999, 130). By preventing overexploitation of forests and through forms of social collaboration such as labour exchange, the recognition of customary institutions for managing land and water resources contributes to sustainable use of ecosystem resources (SDGs 6, 15), protection of the world’s cultural and natural heritage (SDG 11), and mitigation of climate change (SDG 13).
In order to improve local livelihoods and to tackle out-migration, landscape maintenance and red rice cultivation need to be economically feasible. Well-regulated and community-based tourism activities can create new income opportunities for younger generations but can only be part of an integrated set of measures. In Yuanyang County, traditional knowledge is further promoted to “upscale” food production and management capacity of farmers through a cooperative business model. This model is based on the cooperation of four partners: the state-owned Yuanyang County Grain Purchase and Marketing Co., Ltd. 元阳县粮食购销有限公司, the Hani Terraces Organic Red Rice Professional Cooperative of Yuanyang County 元阳县哈尼梯田有机红米专业合作社, red rice farmers and a number of e-commerce companies. To encourage red rice cultivation, seeds are subsidised by the local government, the agricultural cooperative handles supply, packaging and processing, and farmers receive an above-market price (Li et al., 2020). While tourists are just one target group, organic agricultural products are offered to a much wider range of customers through e-commerce sales platforms. Yuanyang County has already set up four e-commerce platforms, such as “Yuanyang Mall” 元阳商城, with more than 3600 red rice shops registered (Office of the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission, 2020). While this model enables a significant value enhancement of local products (SDGs 1, 8) through public–private cooperation (SDG 17), conditions remain largely set by the authorities, and farmers’ involvement seems to be limited to economic participation.
7 Conclusion
Taking a scalar approach to the processual commodification of natural resources and traditional knowledge in agricultural landscapes sheds light on associated sociospatial processes and their impact on sustainable cultural development. In China, the vulnerability of living heritage to economic exploitation and its detrimental effects on heritage value are related to strong development agendas on different administrative scales in a dynamic and globalising environment. Similarly, the recognition and transmission of traditional knowledge offer great potential to trigger community-based development and empower its custodians, albeit within the boundaries of state regulation.
In the Hani Rice Terraces, ethnic tourism development produced “politics of scale” where national heritage authorities are concerned with issues of poverty alleviation and national unity, regional governments aim at harnessing heritage for allocating resources, local governments pursue economic growth, businesspeople strive to make profits and local people try to improve their living conditions. While governments on higher scales pursue strategies of inventorying and conserving heritage to uphold existing power relations, the rescaling of traditional knowledge provides opportunities to expand local spaces of engagement. However, as domestic tourism in China is expected to strongly increase in the future, strict regulation and management will be essential to avoid adverse commodification effects, such as those that occurred at the initial stages of tourism development in the Hani Rice Terraces. Therefore, a scalar approach should not be merely considered as a descriptive and analytical tool but rather a tool to actively initiate upscaling processes of local knowledge and interests to foster positive effects of commodification and achieve a balance between stakeholder interests.
References
Albert, M.-T., & Ringbeck, B. (2015). 40 Jahre Welterbekonvention: Zur Popularisierung eines Schutzkonzeptes für Kultur- und Naturgüter (Heritage studies) (Vol. 2). De Gruyter.
Bouchery, P. (2011). Terrace cultivation and mental landscapes in Southern Yunnan. In M. Lecomte-Tilouine (Ed.), Nature, culture and religion at the crossroads of Asia (pp. 318–343). Social Science Press.
Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25, 591–614.
Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford University Press.
Bruner, E. M. (2004). Culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. University of Chicago Press.
Butland, R. (2012). Defining Angkor: The social, economic and political construction of scale in the management of cultural heritage areas. In K. Taylor & J. L. Lennon (Eds.), Managing cultural landscapes (Key issues in cultural heritage) (pp. 192–210). Routledge.
Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 371–386.
Comaroff, J. L., & Comaroff, J. (2009). Ethnicity, Inc. (Chicago studies in practices of meaning). University of Chicago Press.
Cox, K. R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17(1), 1–23.
Duckett, J. (2001). Bureaucrats in business, Chinese-style: The lessons of market reform and state entrepreneurialism in the People’s Republic of China. World Development, 29(1), 23–37.
Fan, C., & Oey, G. P. (1961). Man Shu (Book of the Southern Barbarians) (G. H. Luce, Trans., G. P. Oey, Ed.). (Data paper no. 44). Southeast Asia Program. Cornell University.
FAO. (2010). Hani Rice Terraces, China. Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems Programme Proposal. Retrieved June 10, 2021, from http://www.fao.org/3/bp781e/bp781e.pdf
Gao, X., Roder, G., Jiao, Y., Ding, Y., Liu, Z., & Tarolli, P. (2020). Farmers’ landslide risk perceptions and willingness for restoration and conservation of world heritage site of Honghe Hani Rice Terraces, China. Landslides, 17, 1915–1924.
Goodman, D. S. G. (2004). The Campaign to “Open Up the West”: National, Provincial-level and Local Perspectives. The China Quarterly (London), 178(178), 317–334.
Gu, H., Jiao, Y., & Liang, L. (2012). Strengthening the socio-ecological resilience of forest-dependent communities: The case of the Hani Rice Terraces in Yunnan, China. Forest Policy and Economics, 22, 53–59.
Han, F. (2018). World Heritage Cultural Landscapes: An old or a new concept for China? Built Heritage, 3, 68–84.
Herod, A. (1991). The production of scale in United States labour relations. Area, 23(1), 82–88.
Hosagrahar, J. (2017). Culture: At the heart of SDGs. UNESCO Courier. Retrieved January 13, 2021, from https://en.unesco.org/ courier/april-june-2017/culture-heart-sdgs
Hua, H., Zhou, S., Ding, Z., & Pan, Y. (2018). The change mechanism of human-environment interactions from the perspective of contextualization: A case study of the Honghe Hani Rice Terraces as a World Cultural Heritage Site. Sustainability, 10(2230), 1–17.
Jiao, Y., & Li, X. (2011). Ethnic culture and nature: Interactions in the Hani Terrace Landscape. In S.-K. Hong, J. Wu, J.-E. Kim, & N. Nakagoshi (Eds.), Landscape ecology in Asian cultures (Ecological research monographs) (pp. 29–40). Springer.
Köhler, B. (2008). Die Materialität von Rescaling-Prozessen: Zum Verhältnis von Politics of Scale und Political Ecology. In M. Wissen, B. Röttger, & S. Heeg (Eds.), Politics of Scale: Räume der Globalisierung und Perspektiven emanzipatorischer Politik (pp. 208–223). Westfälisches Dampfboot.
Kowalski, A. (2011). When cultural capitalization became global practice: The 1972 World Heritage Convention. In N. Bandelj & F. Wherry (Eds.), The cultural wealth of nations (pp. 73–89). Stanford University Press.
Lähdesmäki, T., Thomas, S., & Zhu, Y. (Eds.). (2019). Politics of scale: New directions in critical heritage studies. Berghahn Books.
Lennon, J. L. (2012). Cultural landscape management: International influences. In K. Taylor & J. L. Lennon (Eds.), Managing cultural landscapes (Key issues in cultural heritage) (pp. 45–70). Routledge.
Li, S. 李树芬, Fang, T. 方婷, & Xu, S. 许生菲. (2020). Honghe Zhou Yuanyang Xian: Titian hongmi rang rizi huo qi lai 红河州元阳县:梯田红米让日子火起来 (Honghe Prefecture, Yuanyang County: Red rice from the terraces brings about better days). Yunnan Daily 云南日报. Retrieved March 9, 2021, from www.yn.xinhuanet.com/nets/2020-12/21/c_139606291.htm
MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. The American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589–603.
Marston, S. A. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219–242.
McCarthy, J. (2005). Scale, sovereignty and strategy in environmental governance. Antipode, 37(4), 731–753.
Oakes, T. (2013). Heritage as improvement: Cultural display and contested governance in rural China. Modern China, 39(4), 380–407.
Office of the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission 中共中央网络安全和信息化委员会办公室. (2020). Yunnan Sheng Honghe Zhou Yuanyang Xian shenhua wangluo fupin, dazao ‘liu ge pingtai’ zhutui dianshang jingzhun fupin 云南省红河州元阳县深化网络扶贫 打造“六个平台”助推电商精准扶贫 (Yuanyang County in Honghe Prefecture, Yunnan Province, intensifies poverty reduction by use of the internet, building “six platforms” to boost precision poverty alleviation through e-commerce), Cyberspace Administration of China. Retrieved June 13, 2021, from www.cac.gov.cn/2020-07/22/c_1596970848192771.htm
Schmitt, T. (2011). Cultural Governance: Zur Kulturgeographie des UNESCO-Welterberegimes. Erdkundliches Wissen, 149. Franz Steiner Verlag.
Smith, N. (1984). Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space. Basil Blackwell.
Smith, N. (2000). Scale. In R. Johnston, D. Gregory, G. Pratt, & M. Watts (Eds.), The dictionary of human geography (4th ed., pp. 724–727). Blackwell. (Original work published 1981).
Su, X. (2013). Tourism, migration and the politics of built heritage in Lijiang, China. In T. Blumenfield & H. Silverman (Eds.), Cultural heritage politics in China (pp. 101–114). Springer.
Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local: ‘Glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In K. R. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization (pp. 137–166). Guilford Press.
Takeuchi, K. (2010). Rebuilding the relationship between people and nature: The Satoyama Initiative. Ecological Research, 25(5), 891–897.
Taylor, P. J. (1982). A materialist framework for political geography. Transactions – Institute of British Geographers (1965), 7(1), 15–34.
Throsby, D. (2017). Culturally sustainable development: Theoretical concept or practical policy instrument? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(2), 133–147.
UCLG. (2004). Agenda 21 for culture. Approved on May 8, 2004, by the 4th Forum of Local Authorities for Social Inclusion of Porto Alegre in Barcelona, Spain, and adopted as reference document by United Cities and Local Governments. Retrieved May 30, 2021, from https://www.agenda21culture.net/sites/default/files/files/documents/multi/ag21_en.pdf
UNESCO. (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2013). The Hangzhou Declaration: Placing culture at the heart of sustainable development policies. (CLT-2013/WS/16). Adopted on May 17, 2013, in Hangzhou, People's Republic of China. Retrieved May 25, 2021, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000221238
Urry, J. (1990). The tourist gaze: Leisure and travel in contemporary societies. Sage.
Wallenwein, F. (2020). Tackling urban monotony: Cultural heritage conservation in China’s historically and culturally famous cities. CrossAsia-eBooks. https://doi.org/10.11588/xabooks.748
Xu, J., Fox, J., Lu, X., Podger, N., Leisz, S., & Ai, X. (1999). Effects of swidden cultivation, state policies, and customary institutions on land cover in a Hani village, Yunnan, China. Mountain Research and Development, 19(2), 123–132.
Yan, H. (2018). World Heritage craze in China: Universal discourse, national culture, and local memory. Berghahn Books.
Zhang, L., & Stewart, W. (2017). Sustainable tourism development of landscape heritage in a rural community: A case study of Azheke village at China Hani Rice Terraces. Built Heritage, 4, 37–51.
Zhang, Y., Min, Q., Zhang, C., He, L., Zhang, S., Yang, L., Tian, M., & Xiong, Y. (2017). Traditional culture as an important power for maintaining agricultural landscapes in cultural heritage sites: A case study of the Hani terraces. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 25, 170–179.
Zhu, Y. (2018). Heritage and romantic consumption in China (Asian heritages). Amsterdam University Press.
Zhu, Y. (2019). Politics of scale: Cultural heritage in China. In T. Lähdesmäki, S. Thomas, & Y. Zhu (Eds.), Politics of scale: New directions in critical heritage studies (pp. 21–35). Berghahn Books.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable insights and constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wallenwein, F. (2022). Shifting Scales in the Honghe Hani Rice Terraces: Traditional Knowledge, Commodification and Community Participation. In: Albert, MT., Bernecker, R., Cave, C., Prodan, A.C., Ripp, M. (eds) 50 Years World Heritage Convention: Shared Responsibility – Conflict & Reconciliation. Heritage Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05660-4_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05660-4_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05659-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05660-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)