Abstract
This chapter identifies key guidelines and opportunities for the incorporation of cultural considerations into youth suicide prevention, assessment, and intervention. Cultural factors and principles from the Cultural Theory and Model of Suicide (Chu et al., 2010) are extended to ethnic, gender, and sexual minority youth, to identify cultural factors that are more salient or more strongly related to suicide risk for youth populations. Research supports a downward extension of the Cultural Theory and Model of Suicide for minority youth, with its three theoretical principles and four factors of cultural sanctions, idioms of distress, minority stress, and social discord. Specific youth-related risk factors within these four factors are specified, including academic stress, family rejection, intergenerational conflict, and experiences of peer rejection, victimization, and bullying due to the youth’s minority identities. Integration of these key cultural factors is important for culturally responsive suicide prevention and practice across diverse youth populations. Best practices for infusing cultural considerations and suggestions for future research are highlighted.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Rates of suicide are often elevated in racial and ethnic minority youth, with increasing rates for Hispanic, Black, and Asian or Pacific Islander youth and a decreasing rate for White youth between 2018 and 2019 (Ramchand et al., 2021). Further, LGBTQ+ youth are at high risk for suicidality, with some research suggesting this population is three times more at risk than their heterosexual and cisgender peers (Hatchel et al., 2021; see Rubin et al., Chap. 13, this volume). These higher suicide rates among racial, ethnic, gender, and sexual minority youth align with some findings that these populations have higher rates of suicide ideation and behaviors, in comparison to their non-minority counterparts (Kann et al., 2016; King et al., 2008). Research has shown that cultural factors play a significant role in predicting and explaining suicidal behavior in racial and ethnic minority youth (Goldston et al., 2008). However, current research has not created recommendations that incorporate cultural considerations for youth, making it difficult for practice and policy to integrate these factors (Polanco-Roman & Miranda, 2021). For this reason, the current chapter presents the Cultural Theory and Model of Suicide for Youth, to provide guidelines for integrating cultural differences into suicide practice, policy, and research.
The Cultural Theory and Model of Suicide for Youth
The original Cultural Theory and Model of Suicide synthesized research from 1991 to 2011 via an extensive literature review of articles regarding culturally specific suicide risk and protective factors into theoretical principles across four major cultural factors (cultural sanctions, idioms of distress, minority stress, and social discord). The model was originally developed for use across the life span; however, this chapter examines specific use of the model with cultural minority youth, presented in Fig. 11.1 (Chu et al., 2010). The Cultural Theory and Model of Suicide for Youth addresses the four overarching cultural factors that have been shown in research as particularly salient or more strongly related to suicide behaviors for various ethnic minority and LGBTQ+ youth. Because of this cultural factor rather than group-specific approach, individual minority groups are often discussed together (e.g., as “cultural minority youth”) in this chapter.
Cultural Sanctions
Cultural sanctions are the messages of approval or acceptability supported by one’s culture. The literature suggests that two types of cultural sanctions, including the unacceptability and shame associated with life events and the acceptability of suicide as an option, influence the developmental pathways to suicide. Notably, cultural sanctions can moderate the relationship between one’s exposure to stressful life events and suicidal distress (Chu et al., 2020). For instance, while academic difficulties augment suicide risk for all youth, academic stress is a particularly salient suicide risk factor for Asian American youth due to cultural demands for academic excellence and shame associated with academic failure (Wong et al., 2011).
Second, the perception of suicide as an “acceptable” action increases suicide risk for ethnic and sexual minority youth. For example, some Asian American youth view suicide as a rational (even honorable) way of handling stressful situations that might bring dishonor to their families (Thapa et al., 2015), and lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth have been found to view suicide as more acceptable than their heterosexual counterparts (Canetto et al., 2021). In contrast, religions with negative attitudes toward suicide may protect ethnic minority youth from suicide risk (Cole-Lewis et al., 2016).
Idioms of Distress
A second major way in which culture interfaces with suicide risk is through variations in youth’s expression of suicidal distress – called “idioms of suicidal distress.” Chu et al. (2010) suggested that minoritized individuals vary in whether or not they express suicidal thoughts and behaviors, the manner of expression, and specific methods of attempting suicide. Ethnic minority youth, for example, appear to be less likely to reveal their suicidal ideation and behaviors (Anderson et al., 2015). Externalizing behaviors as an effort to guard themselves against victimization may be particularly related to suicide expression among Black youth (Congressional Black Caucus Emergency Taskforce on Black Youth Suicide and Mental Health, 2019). As another example, Latinx youth tend to express their suicidality through risk-taking behaviors, irritability, and substance use (Olshen et al., 2007).
Minority Stress
Minority stress includes elevated stress levels stemming from experiences of discrimination and social inequities for youth of minority status (Meyer, 2003). Such stress results in increased depression, substance use, and suicidal thoughts or behaviors. For Black youth, discrimination, racism, low socioeconomic status, and neighborhood disadvantage are associated with higher risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (Opara et al., 2020). Among Asian American youth, experiences of perceived discrimination have been linked to increased lifetime suicidal ideation and attempts (Kuroki & Tilley, 2012). Likewise, experiences of victimization and prejudice among transgender individuals (particularly for ages below 25) are related to high levels of suicidality (Johns et al., 2019). Research has also shown that acculturative stress from both family and society is positively associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors in Latinx, Asian American, and Black youth (Gomez et al., 2011).
Social Discord
Family discord, conflict, perceived burdensomeness, and lack of positive relationships are strong predictors of suicide risk for Hispanic, Asian American, and Black youth (Garza & Pettit, 2010; Joe et al., 2007; Kuroki & Tilley, 2012). Intergenerational cultural conflict (ICC) is a unique construct associated with family discord, which refers to the gaps between levels of acculturation and cultural values between youth and their parents. This conflict is shown to be a stronger contributing factor to Latinx and Asian American youth’s suicide behaviors in comparison to their White counterparts (Fortuna et al., 2007; Lau et al., 2002). Additionally, family alienation and invalidating familial discourse are related to increased suicidal thoughts and behaviors for LGBTQ+ youth (McBee-Strayer & Rogers, 2002).
Peer rejection, victimization, and bullying are also strongly associated with an increased risk of suicidal behaviors among LGBTQ+ youth with ethnic minority identities (Hatchel et al., 2019a, b). The relationship between peer victimization/bullying and suicidal ideation is mediated by increased feelings of alienation and a reduced sense of school belonging (Lardier et al., 2020).
Three Theoretical Principles for Cultural Suicide Factors
Past research indicates that the four cultural suicide factors - cultural sanctions, idioms of distress, minority stress, and social discord - operate according to the following three theoretical principles. First, culture affects the types of stressors that are related to increased suicidal ideation and behaviors for youth. Second, the cultural meanings (i.e., cultural sanctions) associated with life stressors and suicide affect the development of suicide risk, one’s threshold of tolerance for psychological pain, and potential for suicidal behavior. Third, culture affects how suicidal thoughts and behaviors are expressed. In particular, culture can impact how one expresses their suicidality, such as their choice to disclose or hide their thoughts, as well as what methods they use to make attempts.
Implications
Practice Implications
Given the myriad of ways that suicidal distress can be expressed across cultures, cultural idioms of suicidal distress should be integrated into screening and assessment for symptoms of suicidal ideation, intent, plan, and means. For example, the Cultural Assessment of Risk for Suicide (CARS; Chu et al., 2013) was developed to assess culturally specific suicide risk factors among adults, which is now adapted, but not yet psychometrically validated, for use with adolescents as CARS-A (Khoury, 2020). Furthermore, how youth symptoms are assessed (e.g., interview and self-report), what questions are asked and in what sequence, and how confidentiality concerns and psychoeducation are provided should be carefully considered. Providers need to account for internalized stigma, trust with healthcare systems, different reporting styles, willingness to disclose risk, and unique idioms or expressions of suicidal distress for ethnic, gender, and sexual minority youth. Moreover, risk and protective factors related to minority stress and social discord should be integrated into comprehensive assessment protocols to determine the ultimate suicide risk level for clients, with cultural sanctions/meanings of suicide about stressors and suicide as influential factors that modulate such risk. Together, these factors and principles are important for facilitating recovery through culturally tailored safety plans and treatments with youth and their families.
Research Implications
The four factors and three principles of the Cultural Theory and Model of Suicide for Youth can serve as grounding principles for research across diverse populations. It is important to use evidence-based tools and assessments to ensure consistency across the field and that all individuals are screened appropriately. Studies are needed to further develop and validate culturally adapted suicide risk screening and assessment measures for adolescents, as well as to infuse these cultural factors into adaptations of existing evidence-based protocols. There is also a growing need to validate, adapt, or create suicide prevention programs that are specifically tailored to these factors. Future research is needed to deepen our understanding of the ways in which the cultural factors and principles are experienced in specific cultural groups. This research has particular relevance for cultural minority subgroups who have elevated rates and/or risk for suicide, suicidal ideation, or attempts (e.g., Latinx, Black, Native American/Alaskan Native, and LGBTQ+ youth).
Policy Implications
Suicide prevention strategic plans and safety protocols at the school, county, state, and national level should incorporate culture and diversity (including the four factors and three principles of the Cultural Theory and Model of Suicide for Youth identified in this chapter) as a priority when aiming to reduce youth suicide. For example, policies outlining best practices for suicide prevention efforts should include targeted outreach to specific groups of minoritized youth experiencing family rejection and/or academic stress. Prevention and postvention services in schools should also incorporate minority-specific resources (e.g., The Trevor Project for LGBTQ+ youth). Furthermore, resources that include suicide warning signs should highlight cultural factors (e.g., idioms of distress such as risk-taking behaviors, irritability, or displays of aggression, or minority stress such as feeling targeted or bullied as a minority individual) to promote awareness of specific cues for minority youth suicide risk.
Training and education policies would also benefit from integration with the Cultural Theory and Model of Suicide for Youth. For example, policymakers and administrators should place a strong value on cultural factors as they prioritize suicide-related competencies in mental health graduate education, and state-level licensing requirements that require continuing education in suicide. Otherwise, well-meaning efforts may fall short of meeting the needs of some of our most vulnerable youth and families. Finally, local and national guidelines for suicide safety and treatment should be re-examined from a cultural lens taking into account the factors highlighted throughout this chapter and a willingness to revise or recreate programs.
Conclusions
Evidence, although limited, suggests that a downward extension of the Cultural Theory and Model of Suicide is appropriate for ethnic, gender, and sexual minority youth, with considerations of specific risk factors that may increase their vulnerability to suicidal behaviors. A better understanding about how risk factors such as academic stress, ICC, and peer rejection influence suicide risk can have implications for practice, research, and policy. Routine integration of these cultural risk and protective factors of suicide will help promote cultural responsivity in youth suicide prevention and postvention efforts. Recent efforts to attend to the need for cultural infusion into suicide prevention efforts are evident in printed resources such as the Suicide Prevention Resource Center’s Guidelines for Culturally and Linguistically Responsive Media & Resource Materials or Guidance for Culturally Adapting Gatekeeper Trainings (SPRC, 2017, 2020); however, progress is nascent and in need of dedicated commitment and resources in the field. There is an urgent need to provide additional support for practitioners, researchers, and policymakers to further integrate culture into the valuable work of mitigating youth suicidality.
References
Anderson, L. M., Lowry, L. S., & Wuensch, K. L. (2015). Racial differences in adolescents’ answering questions about suicide. Death Studies, 39(10), 600–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2015.1047058
Canetto, S. S., Antonelli, P., Ciccotti, A., Dettore, D., & Lamis, D. A. (2021). Suicidal as normal – A lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth script? Crisis, 42(4), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000730
Chu, J. P., Goldblum, P., Floyd, R., & Bongar, B. (2010). The cultural theory and model of suicide. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 14, 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appsy.2011.11.001
Chu, J., Floyd, R., Diep, H., Pardo, S., Goldblum, P., & Bongar, B. (2013). A tool for the culturally competent assessment of suicide: The Cultural Assessment of Risk for Suicide (CARS) measure. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031264
Chu, J., Maruyama, B., Batchelder, H., Goldblum, P., Bongar, B., & Wickham, R. E. (2020). Cultural pathways for suicidal ideation and behaviors. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 26(3), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000307
Cole-Lewis, Y. C., Gipson, P. Y., Opperman, K. J., Arango, A., & King, C. A. (2016). Protective role of religious involvement against depression and suicidal ideation among youth with interpersonal problems. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(4), 1172–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0194-y
Fortuna, L. R., Perez, D. J., Canino, G., Sribney, W., & Alegria, M. (2007). Prevalence and correlates of lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among Latino subgroups in the United States. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 68(4), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v68n0413
Garza, M. J., & Pettit, J. W. (2010). Perceived burdensomeness, familism, and suicidal ideation among Mexican women: Enhancing understanding of risk and protective factors. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 40(6), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.2010.40.6.561
Goldston, D. B., Molock, S. D., Whitbeck, L. B., Murakami, J. L., Zayas, L. H., & Nagayama Hall, G. C. (2008). Cultural considerations in adolescent suicide prevention and psychosocial treatment. The American Psychologist, 63(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.1.14
Gomez, J., Miranda, R., & Polanco, L. (2011). Acculturative stress, perceived discrimination, and vulnerability to suicide attempts among emerging adults. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(11), 1465–1476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9688-9
Hatchel, T., Delgado, A. V., Huang, Y., & Espelage, D. L. (2019a). Minority stress among transgender adolescents: The role of peer victimization, school belonging, and ethnicity. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 2467–2476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1168-3
Hatchel, T., Ingram, K. M., Mintz, S., Hartley, C., Valido, A., Espelage, D. L., & Wayman, P. (2019b). Predictors of suicidal ideation and attempts among LGBTQ adolescents: The roles of help-seeking beliefs, peer victimization, depressive symptoms, and drug use. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 2443–2455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01339-2
Hatchel, T., Polanin, J. R., & Espelage, D. L. (2021). Suicidal thoughts and behaviors among LGBTQ youth: Meta-analyses and a systematic review. Archives of Suicide Research, 25(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2019.1663329
Joe, S., Romer, D., & Jamieson, P. E. (2007). Suicide acceptability is related to suicide planning in U.S. adolescents and young adults. Suicide and Life-threatening Behavior, 37(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.2007.37.2.165
Johns, M. M., Lowry, R., Andrzejewski, J., Barrios, L. C., Demissie, Z., McManus, T., Rasberry, C. N., Robin, L., & Underwood, J. M. (2019). Transgender identity and experiences of violence victimization, substance use, suicide risk, and sexual risk behaviors among high school students—19 states and large Urban School districts, 2017. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68(3), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6803a3
Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Hawkins, J., et al. (2016). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2015. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries (Washington, DC: 2002), 65(6), 1–174.
Khoury, O. (2020). Adaptation of the cultural assessment of risk for suicide measure for adolescents [ProQuest Information & Learning]. In Dissertation abstracts international: Section B: The sciences and engineering, vol. 81, issue 2–B
King, M., Semlyen, J., Tai, S. S., Killaspy, H., Osborn, D., Popelyuk, D., & Nazareth, I. (2008). A systematic review of mental disorder, suicide, and deliberate self harm in lesbian, gay and bisexual people. BMC Psychiatry, 8, 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-70
Kuroki, Y., & Tilley, J. L. (2012). Recursive partitioning analysis of lifetime suicidal behaviors in Asian Americans. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026586
Ladier, D. T., Pinto, S. A., Brammer, M. K., Garcia-Reid, P., & Reid, R. J. (2020). The relationship between queer identity, social connection, school bullying, and suicidal ideations among youth of color. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 14, 74–99.
Lau, A. S., Jernewall, N. M., Zane, N., & Myers, H. F. (2002). Correlates of suicidal behaviors among Asian American outpatient youths. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8(3), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.8.3.199
McBee-Strayer, S. M., & Rogers, J. R. (2002). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual suicidal behavior: Testing a constructivist model. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 32(3), 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.32.3.272.22171
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
Olshen, E., McVeigh, K. H., Wunsch-Hitzig, R. A., & Rickert, V. I. (2007). Dating violence, sexual assault, and suicide attempts among urban teenagers. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161(6), 539. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.161.6.539
Opara, I., Assan, M. A., Pierre, K., Gunn, J. F., Metzger, I., Hamilton, J., & Arugu, E. (2020). Suicide among Black children: An integrated model of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide and intersectionality theory for researchers and clinicians. Journal of Black Studies, 51(6), 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934720935641
Polanco-Roman, L., & Miranda, R. (2021). A cycle of exclusion that impedes suicide research among racial and ethnic minority youth. Suicide and Life-threatening Behavior, 52, 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12752
Ramchand, R., Gordon, J. A., & Pearson, J. L. (2021). Trends in suicide rates by race and ethnicity in the United States. JAMA Network Open, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11563
Suicide Prevention Resource Center. (2017). Creating linguistically and culturally competent suicide prevention materials. Education Development Center, Inc.
Suicide Prevention Resource Center. (2020). Guidance for culturally adapting gatekeeper trainings. Education Development Center, Inc.
Thapa, P., Sung, Y., Klingbeil, D. A., Lee, C. Y., & Klimes-Dougan, B. (2015). Attitudes and perceptions of suicide and suicide prevention messages for Asian Americans. Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 5(4), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs5040547
The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), Emergency Taskforce on Black Youth Suicide and Mental Health. (2019). Ring the alarm: The crisis of black youth suicide in America. https://watsoncoleman.house.gov/uploadedfiles/full_taskforce_report.pdf
Wong, Y. J., Brownson, C., & Schwing, A. E. (2011). Risk and protective factors associated with Asian American students’ suicidal ideation: A multicampus, national study. Journal of College Student Development, 52(4), 396–408.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chu, J., O’Neill, S.E., Ng, J.F., Khoury, O. (2022). The Cultural Theory and Model of Suicide for Youth. In: Ackerman, J.P., Horowitz, L.M. (eds) Youth Suicide Prevention and Intervention. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06127-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06127-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06126-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06127-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)