Abstract
Although birds have always been one of the best-known taxa on the Gulf of Guinea oceanic islands, our understanding of their ecology and evolution has increased substantially in the last two decades. Intensive field-based surveys have allowed the first detailed island-wide distribution maps for most species and a much better grasp of habitat associations, highlighting the importance of native forests for many of the endemic birds. Molecular data have provided important insights into evolutionary history, leading to an extensive revision of the taxonomy of the islands’ endemic avifauna. Most speciation events are much more recent than the age of the islands, indicating a high species turn-over that is likely explained by the islands’ history of intense volcanic activity and their moderate distances to the mainland. These islands have the highest accumulation of endemic bird species for small oceanic islands: at least 29 endemic species occur in three islands with a total area of just over 1000 km2. This may be explained by their particular geographic location: offshore from a species-rich continent at distances that allowed the colonization and evolution in isolation of many distinct lineages. All these contributions are now being used to ensure bird conservation, through updated species conservation status and species action plans for the most threatened species, and also to promote the conservation of the native forests on which most of the endemic birds depend.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Birds are one of the animal groups with which people are most familiar. This is especially true in the oceanic islands of the Gulf of Guinea where the avifauna has a prominent position in popular culture. The islands’ birds have also been a preferential target of scientific investigation since the colonial period, in part due to the exceptionally high number of endemic species. This richness has played an important role in bringing global attention to the unique biota of these islands. The state of ornithological knowledge on these islands was summarized at the start of the present century (Jones and Tye 2006), but since then a wealth of new information has been gathered by an increasing number of studies. Here we provide an updated overview of the diversity, ecology, and evolution of this remarkable avifauna.
We follow the taxonomy and nomenclature of Clements et al. (2021), which is identical to the most recent checklist of the birds of the region (de Lima and Melo 2021). Taxonomic authorities are presented in the checklist (Appendix).
History of Ornithological Research
The avifauna of the Gulf of Guinea islands was little known before the nineteenth century. These relatively isolated oceanic islands were logistically difficult to access, with rugged, inhospitable interiors, so that progress was slow and sporadic, with decades-long gaps between collections. By the end of the nineteenth century, the avifauna was well documented, although important collections made at various times in the twentieth century further contributed to recognizing the importance of the islands’ unusually high endemism. Throughout this period, it became clear that several endemic taxa were extremely rare and their forest habitats vulnerable to development, prompting conservation concerns in recent decades. Easier access to the islands and better logistical support have made it possible to run longer-term research and conservation projects, and the advent of modern molecular phylogenetics has enabled significant insights into the evolutionary history of the endemic bird community.
Apart from a few specimens collected earlier, the avifauna remained little known until the 1840s, when the islands were used as a base for the British Expedition to the River Niger. Expedition members collected several new species on São Tomé and Annobón but visited Príncipe only briefly and did not collect any birds there (Allen and Thomson 1848). Considerable confusion surrounded the provenance and identity of these specimens, however, due in part to the repeated loading and unloading of cargoes between ships and between islands. Other misidentifications resulted simply because African bird taxonomy was then in its infancy.
The most important early collections on Príncipe and São Tomé were made between 1847 and 1850 for the museums of Hamburg and Bremen by Carl Weiss, most of whose specimens were described in Hamburg by Gustav Hartlaub (1850, 1857), but confusion surrounded many Príncipe specimens that were wrongly ascribed to the African continent. These confusions were eventually resolved with the help of Heinrich Dohrn and John Gerrard Keulemans, whose collections on Príncipe between April and September 1865 were complemented by the field notes of Keulemans that proved to be a valuable source of information (Dohrn 1866; Keulemans 1866).
In 1885, Adolpho Frederico Moller obtained some birds from São Tomé while collecting plants for the Coimbra Botanic Gardens (Vieira 1887). Between 1885 and 1895, Francisco Newton assembled a comprehensive collection from all three islands for the Lisbon Museum, which were described in a long series of papers by José du Bocage (Bocage 1867, 1879, 1887a, b, 1888a–c, 1889a–c, 1891, 1893a, b, 1903, 1904). Newton was also a keen observer whose descriptions of behavior and ecology were partially published by Bocage as ancillary information. However, the original letters that Newton wrote to Bocage to accompany his specimens and almost all the specimens themselves were destroyed in the disastrous 1978 fire in the Museu Bocage in Lisbon. By the end of the nineteenth century, most landbird species had been described but an important collection was made for the museum at Genoa by Leonardo Fea between 1899 and 1901 (Salvadori 1903a–c).
Two significant collections were made in the early decades of the twentieth century. Boyd Alexander visited the main islands in 1909 collecting for the British Museum (Bannerman 1914, 1915a, b) and José Correia and his wife Virginia collected on Príncipe and São Tomé for the American Museum of Natural History in 1928–29 (Correia 1928–29; Amadon 1953). Both Alexander and the Correias kept extensive field notes on the distribution and status of the endemic bird species they collected at a time when agricultural exploitation of the islands was at its peak and some species had evidently become very rare. Correia’s valuable and entertaining diary (1928–29) remains unpublished, but his collection allowed Amadon (1953) to produce an important synthesis on the avian zoogeography of the Gulf of Guinea islands.
The next ornithological survey of Príncipe and São Tomé took place in 1949, when an Oxford University team published the first detailed field notes for most of the endemic birds (Snow 1950). Annobón has always been difficult to access because of its remoteness, so there was an even longer gap between Alexander’s 1909 expedition and subsequent visits by Aurélio Basilio in 1955 (Basilio 1957) and Hilary Fry in 1959 (Fry 1961).
A Portuguese scientific mission to Príncipe and São Tomé in 1954 collected birds and assessed the status of those that might require protection under colonial law (Frade 1958, 1959; Frade and Santos 1977). René de Naurois visited the islands several times in 1963 and 1970–73, publishing extensively on the ecology and systematics of most indigenous species, including all the endemic birds (Naurois 1972a, b, 1973a, b, 1975a, b, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983a, b, 1984a–d, 1985, 1987a–c, 1988a–c; Naurois and Castro Antunes 1973; Naurois and Wolters 1975). He also wrote the first book to deal exclusively with the birds of all three oceanic Gulf of Guinea islands (Naurois 1994).
In June 1983, ornithologists from the Dresden Museum visited São Tomé (Günther and Feiler 1985) and again in March-April 1991, the second time as part of a multi-disciplinary expedition (Nadler 1993). Annobón belatedly received further attention with visits by Mike Harrison (1990) and Jaime Pérez del Val (2001). In 1996–97 an expedition by the University of the Azores conducted the first detailed study dedicated to seabirds (Monteiro et al. 1997).
The Red Data Book for African birds considered seven endemic bird species of these islands to be threatened (Collar and Stuart 1985), highlighting the fact that four single-island endemics on São Tomé had not been seen for over 50 years and were possibly extinct. This publication prompted conservation initiatives by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN—Jones and Tye 1988; Burlison and Jones 1988) and by the European Union. The latter acted mostly through ECOFAC, a program sponsored by the European Union promoting the conservation and sustainable use of forest ecosystems in Central Africa (Anon. 1994) that published the first field guide to the birds of São Tomé and Príncipe (Christy and Clarke 1998). Increased attention led to the rediscovery of all four “missing” bird species: São Tomé Short-tail Motacilla bocagii in 1987 (Eccles 1988), Sao Tome Ibis Bostrychia bocagei, Newton’s Fiscal Lanius newtoni in 1990 (Atkinson et al. 1994), and São Tomé Grosbeak Crithagra concolor in 1991, more than a century after it had last been seen (Sergeant et al. 1992). On Príncipe, the rare endemic Príncipe Thrush Turdus xanthorhynchus was rediscovered in 1996, after more than 50 years (Christy and Gascoigne 1996).
The number of ornithological studies has greatly increased since the turn of the twenty-first century, leading to numerous taxonomic changes and a much better understanding of this unique avifauna (Jones and Tye 2006; Melo 2007; de Lima and Melo 2021). However, there is still much to be discovered as exemplified by the existence of the Príncipe Scops-Owl, which was only confirmed in 2016, 90 years after Correia collected information from local people on its putative occurrence (Verbelen et al. 2016).
Species Diversity and Distribution
General Patterns
According to the latest assessment (de Lima and Melo 2021), the avifauna of the oceanic islands of the Gulf of Guinea comprises 146 confirmed species (Appendix). These include 66 resident species, which contain a remarkably high number of endemics: 29 (44%) species and 16 (24%) subspecies (Table 21.1). Seventeen species (26%) are possibly non-native, six are breeding migrant species (all of which are seabirds), four are regular non-breeding migrants, and 62 are vagrants. Eight species are of uncertain status, including five that may breed in the archipelago and three that have been recorded on the islands in the past. Additionally, the occurrence of 51 species remains unconfirmed, being based solely on uncorroborated observations (de Lima and Melo 2021).
The most outstanding feature of the resident bird assemblage is the high level of endemism (Fig. 21.1). Almost all endemic species are single-island endemics, except for the Sao Tome Pigeon Columba malherbii, which occurs on all three islands, and the Sao Tome Spinetail Zoonavena thomensis and Príncipe Seedeater Crithagra rufobrunnea, both of which occur on Príncipe and São Tomé (Table 21.2). Endemic subspecies are also mostly restricted to a single island with two exceptions. The Little Swift Apus affinis bannermani occurs on Príncipe and São Tomé and is also considered the taxon present on the neighboring land-bridge island Bioko. Likewise, the African Emerald Cuckoo Chrysococcyx cupreus insularum is considered the taxon present on all three oceanic islands in the archipelago (Table 21.3, Box 21.1). Another defining feature is the unusually high phylogenetic diversity of these oceanic islands, with resident birds representing 28 families (Appendix).
Non-endemic native resident species include a large proportion of aquatic species, including three Ardeidae, one Phalacrocoracidae, and one Rallidae. They also include single representatives of Accipitridae, Psittacidae, Sturnidae, Nectariniidae, and Estrildidae. Possibly non-native species include five Ploceidae, three Phasianidae, three Estrildidae, two Columbidae, and single representatives of Apodidae, Psittacidae, Viduidae, and Fringillidae.
Breeding migrants include six seabird species: four Laridae, one Phaethontidae, and one Sulidae. Apart from the White-tailed Tropicbird Phaethon lepturus, which can breed in tree cavities and cliffs on the main islands, these species breed on bare offshore islets, such as Boné de Jóquei, Tinhosas (both near Príncipe), Sete Pedras, Rolas (both near São Tomé) and Tortuga (near Annobón). There are surprisingly few regular non-breeding migrants: three coastal waders (Scolopacidae) and the Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica (Hirundinidae). This contrasts with the large number of occasional migrants, comprising 62 species belonging to 27 families (Appendix), mostly shorebirds and passerines, whose number will continue to grow as currently uncorroborated records are confirmed. These patterns reinforce the hypothesis that migrants, whether Afrotropical or Palearctic, do not regularly cross the open sea of the Gulf of Guinea (Jones and Tye 2006).
Island Accounts
Príncipe has 88 confirmed species (Table 21.1, Appendix), including 32 resident species, of which 8 are single-island endemics and 3 are shared endemics with the neighboring islands (Tables 21.1 and 21.2). Príncipe also holds 9 (28%) endemic subspecies from species occurring on the mainland, together with two endemic subspecies of the endemic Príncipe Seedeater (Table 21.2). Five species (16%) are possibly non-native: two Columbidae, two Estrildidae, and one Apodidae. Príncipe, and especially its surrounding islets, holds breeding colonies of all seabird species that reproduce in the oceanic islands of the Gulf of Guinea, except Bridled Tern Onychoprion anaethetus. Tinhosas islets are remarkable for their seabird colonies, which hold around 200,000 breeding pairs of Sooty Tern O. fuscatus, accounting for 1% of the global population of this species and meeting the criteria for Important Bird Area (Valle et al. 2016). Both Tinhosas and Boné de Jóquei also hold important but declining breeding colonies of Brown Booby Sula leucogaster.
São Tomé has 96 confirmed species (Table 21.1, Appendix), including 50 resident species, of which 17 (34%) are single-island endemics and 3 (6%) are endemics shared with the nearby islands (Tables 21.1 and 21.2). This island also holds seven (14%) endemic subspecies of species that occur in continental Africa, together with one endemic subspecies of the endemic Príncipe Seedeater (Tables 21.1 and 21.3). Seventeen species (34%) are possibly non-native: five Ploceidae, three Estrildidae, two Phasianidae, two Columbidae, two Psittacidae, and single representatives of Apodidae, Viduidae, and Fringillidae. São Tomé and its surrounding islets, notably Sete Pedras and Rolas, hold breeding colonies of three seabird species: Brown Noddy Anous stolidus, White-tailed Tropicbird, and Brown Booby.
Annobón has 30 confirmed species (Table 21.1, Appendix), including 11 resident species, of which one is a single-island endemic and one is an endemic shared with São Tomé and Príncipe (Tables 21.1 and 21.2). It has three endemic subspecies, two of which are treated as full species by some authors (Table 21.3, Box 21.1), three native non-endemic species (Cuculidae, Rallidae, and Ardeidae), and three possibly non-native species (two phasianids and one estrildid). Seabird colonies include Brown Noddy, Black Noddy Anous minutus, Bridled Tern, and White-tailed Tropicbird.
Box 21.1: Comments on Taxonomic Uncertainties
The numbers link to the species in Table 21.3. Taxonomic authorities given in Appendix
-
1.
Coturnix delegorguei histrionica. Endemic subspecies from São Tomé whose validity should be re-appraised combining multiple lines of evidence, including molecular data.
-
2.
The systematic position of the Lemon Dove has never been satisfactorily resolved. Currently treated as Columba larvata, it was, for a long time, placed in its own genus, Aploplelia. Its current placement within Columba remains uncertain (Pereira 2013): it groups together with the Bronze-naped Pigeon superspecies (C. malherbii, C. delegorguei, C. iriditorques) within a larger clade encompassing the Old-World Columba and most Streptopelia species, but the exact affinities with these two genera remain unresolved. The plumage of Columba larvata provides little phylogenetic information as it varies widely, both between and within populations, and it may also change with age (Amadon 1953; Serle 1959). As such, it is imperative to conduct a full taxonomic revision supported by extensive molecular sampling (Baptista et al. 2020), where many of the current arrangements are unlikely to prevail. The subspecies from São Tomé have been treated by some authorities as a distinct species, but evidence supporting it is anecdotal (Baptista et al. 2020). Molecular evidence for the São Tomé and Príncipe populations detected large differentiation in mitochondrial haplotypes, suggesting at least two colonization events from the mainland (Pereira and Melo, unpublished results). The same data also showed that these populations are closely related to those from southern Cameroon but very distinct from those from Malawi (up to 3.2 my divergence), suggesting that there may be multiple distinct species on the mainland. No molecular data are available for the Annobón population, which is currently placed under C. l. inornata, occurring from Sierra Leone to Gabon.
-
3.
Treron calvus has 15 recognized subspecies, many of which might not be valid (Hoyo et al. 2020). Molecular data placed the endemic Príncipe subspecies, T. c. virescens, together with birds from Bioko, currently treated as an endemic subspecies, T. c. poensis, and revealed two cases (in 14) of mitochondrial introgression from T. sanctithomae, endemic from São Tomé, into the Príncipe population (Pereira 2013).
-
4.
Chrysococcyx cupreus insularum. Endemic subspecies of the three Gulf of Guinea oceanic islands, although most authorities treat or recommend treating C. cupreus as a monotypic species (HBW and BirdLife International 2020; Clements et al. 2021; Gill et al. 2021).
-
5.
Apus affinis bannermani is a subspecies considered to be restricted to the Gulf of Guinea islands of Príncipe, São Tomé, and Bioko (Clements et al. 2021; Gill et al. 2021)—so not strictly speaking an endemic of the oceanic islands. The validity of this subspecies should be re-appraised as it has been considered indistinguishable from the neighboring mainland population (Amadon 1953).
-
6.
Bostrychia olivacea rothschildi. Molecular studies on museum specimens are required to determine if this extinct endemic subspecies from Príncipe is valid, and whether it was more closely related to the São Tomé B. bocagei or to the mainland species B. olivacea.
-
7.
Tyto alba thomensis. Recent molecular evidence suggested that this phenotypically distinct taxon, restricted to São Tomé, may constitute a separate species (Uva et al. 2018; Alves 2019).
-
8.
Otus senegalensis feae. A recent assessment, using multiple lines of evidence but no molecular data, considered the scops-owl from Annobón as a valid endemic species, Otus feae (Collar and Boesman 2020). Both molecular data and phenotypic data (Freitas 2019) place it well within the intra-specific variation of Otus senegalensis, which indicates a recent colonization. The Annobón population is now very likely isolated from O. senegalensis, which is absent from the neighboring mainland. A deep phylogeographic study of O. senegalensis sensu lato is needed to understand its evolutionary history and clarify the taxonomic status of the Annobón population. In any case, several authorities already recognize it as a valid endemic species (e.g., HBW and BirdLife International 2020; Gill et al. 2021).
-
9.
Corythornis cristatus thomensis and Corythornis cristatus nais are endemic subspecies from São Tomé and from Príncipe, respectively. Genetically they fall well within the nominate subspecies: mitochondrial divergences from samples from Malawi were only 0.3% for C. c. thomensis and 0.9% for C. c. nais, and divergence between the two island lineages is 0.8% (Melo and Fuchs 2008). The two subspecies have phenotypic differences: C. c. nais being intermediate between C. cristatus and C. leucogaster, while C. c. thomensis has darker plumage than mainland birds, especially the juveniles (Christy and Clarke 1998). It is possible that these populations represent recent and distinct colonization events that are now evolving in isolation. They are treated as separate endemic species by BirdLife International (HBW and BirdLife International 2020).
-
10.
Halcyon malimbica dryas. Endemic subspecies from Príncipe, whose likely validity should nevertheless be confirmed using multiple lines of evidence, including molecular data.
-
11.
Psittacus erithacus princeps. Mitochondrial data inferred a relatively simple, albeit curious, history for the gray parrots from Príncipe (Melo and O’Ryan 2007), which created the only real taxonomic conundrum for the avifauna of the Gulf of Guinea oceanic islands. This population is the result of two colonization events: one that occurred up to 1.4 mya and a contemporary one. The first colonization came from the mainland stock that evolved into P. timneh, whereas the recent colonization came from P. erithacus. We cannot exclude that the latter was an accidental introduction linked to the Portuguese trade of this species from Angola to Europe, which used to be done by boats that made a stopover in Príncipe (Melo and O’Ryan 2007). Most of the Príncipe birds (75%) have the Príncipe mitochondrial lineage, even though morphologically they are closer to P. erithacus. We still do not know the overall impact on the genome of the mixing of the two lineages. The International Ornithological Council opted to use the genetic evidence to treat the Príncipe population as a subspecies of P. timneh (Gill et al. 2021), while other authorities have kept the original treatment (HBW and BirdLife International 2020; Clements et al. 2021). We consider this to be an open issue that can only be sorted out with an extensive genetic investigation.
-
12.
Dicrurus modestus modestus. The drongo present on Príncipe has been treated for a long time as an endemic species, although its taxonomic status was always considered unclear (Jones and Tye 2006). A recent molecular study on the D. adsimilis complex returned a new taxonomic arrangement for the group, in which the Príncipe population is conspecific with the populations occurring in the forests of the Lower Congo Forest Block, despite clear differences in bill and tail size (Fuchs et al. 2018).
-
13.
Terpsiphone rufiventer smithii. The population of T. rufiventer from Annobón was, until recently, often treated as a separate species, and still is by some authors (Gill et al. 2021). As it is unlikely that there is regular gene flow with the neighboring mainland populations, this population is likely on an independent evolutionary trajectory.
-
14.
Onychognathus fulgidus fulgidus. The nominate subspecies of this large forest starling was described from São Tomé, to which it is endemic. The birds on São Tomé are larger, more robust, and more vocal than those occurring on the African mainland (Amadon 1953; Christy and Clarke 1998), warranting molecular research to determine if it may constitute a distinct species.
Habitat Associations
The aquatic avifauna of the islands is species-poor but occupies a wide variety of ecological niches (Lima et al. 2021). Regularly breeding seabirds include two noddies, two terns, one tropicbird, and one booby, all of which breed in different sets of offshore islets (Monteiro et al. 1997; Jones and Tye 2006—Appendix), where they have distinct nesting microhabitats (Leventis and Olmos 2009; Valle et al. 2016; Bollen et al. 2018). The White-tailed Tropicbird also breeds on cliffs and trees on the main islands, and a putatively distinct form of the Band-rumped Storm-Petrel Hydrobates castro is thought to breed within burrows on the ground in São Tomé’s native forests (Flood et al. 2019). The resident Black Kite Milvus migrans parasitus is also commonly found foraging at sea. Other resident aquatic bird species include predominantly coastal species that also occur along larger rivers, such as Western Reef-Heron Egretta gularis and Long-tailed Cormorant Microcarbo africanus. Predominantly freshwater species also occur along the coast and in brackish waters, such as Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus and Striated Heron Butorides striata. The islands receive remarkably few non-breeding aquatic species as regular visitors, most of which occur on the coast or along the lower reaches of rivers and streams. The lagoons on the northern coast of São Tomé and the bay of Santo António on Príncipe are the main localities where vagrant aquatic birds have been recorded (Jones and Tye 2006; de Lima et al. 2021).
Until the 1990s, assessments of the distributions and habitat associations of the terrestrial birds of the oceanic islands of the Gulf of Guinea were mostly based on non-systematic observations (Jones and Tye 2006) and focused on understanding the links between endemic species and land-use types to evaluate conservation status (Jones and Tye 1988; Atkinson et al. 1991; Peet and Atkinson 1994). Knowledge greatly improved following systematic surveys on both Príncipe (Baillie 2001; Dallimer and King 2008; Dallimer et al. 2012; Fundação Príncipe 2019) and São Tomé (Dallimer et al. 2009; de Lima et al. 2013, 2014; Soares 2017; Soares et al. 2020). These studies have shown that native species, including endemics, dominate the avifauna across the islands, while non-natives tend to be restricted to degraded environments, such as plantations and notably, to non-forested areas. A few of the endemics are more sensitive to anthropogenic influence and are currently restricted to the best-preserved forests. The Giant Weaver Ploceus grandis on São Tomé and the Príncipe Golden-Weaver P. princeps seem to be the only endemic species that are clearly more abundant outside forests, even though the Sao Tome Pigeon, the Sao Tome White-eye Zosterops feae and a few of the endemic subspecies are also frequently encountered outside native forest. As in other tropical forests (e.g., Newbold et al. 2013), species sensitive to forest degradation tend to be larger, and insectivorous or frugivorous, while non-natives are mostly small and granivorous. Other environmental factors are often correlated with land use, making it hard to disentangle their effect on bird assemblages but, overall, the highest proportions of endemics are found in remote steep areas at higher altitudes and with higher rainfall. Annobón is seldom visited by ornithologists, and thus the ecology of its avifauna remains the most incompletely documented (Sloan 2017).
Several studies have focused on the habitat associations of the islands’ Critically Endangered species: Sao Tome Ibis (Margarido 2015; de Lima et al. 2017), Newton’s Fiscal (Maia and Alberto 2009; Lewis et al. 2018), Príncipe Thrush (Dallimer et al. 2010; Rebelo 2021), and Sao Tome Grosbeak (Solé et al. 2012), as well as the Príncipe Scops-Owl, which has also been proposed to qualify as Critically Endangered (Freitas 2019). Other studies have addressed the habitat associations of the Gray Parrot Psittacus erithacus on Príncipe (Valle et al. 2017), the Annobón population of the African Scops-Owl Otus senegalensis feae (Rodriguez-Prieto et al. 2014), the distinctive São Tomé subspecies of Barn Owl Tyto alba thomensis (Alves 2019), and the endemic pigeons of São Tomé (Carvalho et al. 2014). In addition to providing an understanding of distribution and ecology, these studies have also helped in estimating population sizes (i.e., Azevedo 2015) and informing conservation strategies (BirdLife International 2014a, b; Fundação Príncipe et al. 2021).
The Endemic Birds
How Many Endemics?
Endemism in the oceanic islands of the Gulf of Guinea is restricted to resident landbirds (Jones and Tye 2006; de Lima and Melo 2021), although the still undescribed local population of the Band-rumped Storm-Petrel may represent an exception (Flood et al. 2019). Out of the 66 resident landbird species of the three islands, 17 are possibly non-native (de Lima and Melo 2021), and of the remaining 49 confirmed extant natives, 90% are endemic at the species or subspecies level (Tables 21.2, 21.3, and 21.4, Appendix). The exact number of endemic species varies according to different authorities (Hoyo 2020), with the most recent assessments recognizing 32 (HBW and BirdLife International 2021), 31 (Gill et al. 2021), and 29 species (Clements et al. 2021; de Lima and Melo 2021). These discrepancies are restricted to recent speciation events, in which some authors treat sister taxa as species, while others treat them as subspecies (Box 21.1). Such divergent taxonomic treatments are to be expected considering that speciation is a continuous process, and authorities agree that there is a total of 45 distinct evolutionary lineages (endemic species and subspecies, including the Príncipe Scops-Owl). Here we follow a conservative approach, where recent divergence events are treated as subspecies until further evidence emerges, resulting in a total of 29 endemic species (Tables 21.1 and 21.2) and 16 endemic subspecies (Tables 21.1 and 21.3). Additionally, the endemic Príncipe Seedeater has diverged into three single-island endemic subspecies: the nominate restricted to Príncipe, another to Boné de Jóquei (islet c. 3 km offshore from Príncipe), and the third to São Tomé (Table 21.3), a taxonomic arrangement supported by molecular data (Melo 2007).
Bird Endemism of the Gulf of Guinea Oceanic Islands in Perspective
Although confined to a land area of just over 1000 km2, the 29 endemic species of Príncipe, São Tomé, and Annobón represent 60% of the endemic bird species of the vast Guinean Forests of West Africa biodiversity hotspot (area: 621,705 km2; IUCN 2015). It is not surprising for oceanic islands to be centers of endemism, but it is still instructive to compare the bird endemism levels of the Gulf of Guinea islands with those found elsewhere. The Galapagos have 22 endemic landbirds in 13 islands totaling some 8000 km2, whereas the six largest Hawaiian Islands have 30 extant endemic species and 19 documented extinct endemics in over 16,000 km2 (Stattersfield et al. 1998). The high level of bird endemism within the relatively restricted area of the Gulf of Guinea oceanic islands has no parallel, with the islands following a very distinct trajectory to the global pattern (Mayr 1965; Fig. 21.2). In a survey of the 45 small islands (<10,000 km2) that have at least one endemic species, the mean number of endemic species is 2 and the mode is a single species (Coyne and Price 2000). By comparison, São Tomé, 857 km2, has 17 single-island endemic species and Príncipe, 139 km2, has eight, plus three additional shared endemic species. A recent worldwide analysis of bird communities on oceanic islands further identified Príncipe and São Tomé as the only group of islands where the number of species, colonizations, and within-archipelago speciation all exceeded the predictions of the global model (Valente et al. 2020).
Why So Many Endemic Birds?
The 29 endemic species of the oceanic islands of the Gulf of Guinea belong to 20 distinct evolutionary lineages from 16 families. This means that the current diversity of the endemics required at least 20 independent colonization events from the mainland. Hence, the impressive level of bird endemism is spread across independent phylogenetic lineages rather than being concentrated within species-rich genera from just a few colonizations, such as in the well-known adaptive radiations that have occurred in other archipelagos. In the Galapagos, six colonizations gave rise to the 22 extant endemic species, dominated by the radiation of Darwin’s finches (Grant and Grant 2008), and in the Hawaiian archipelago, six colonizations diversified into more than 40 endemic species, dominated by the Hawaiian honeycreepers (Pratt 2005). The factor underlying these distinct patterns is geography. These two archipelagos are much farther from the mainland than the Gulf of Guinea oceanic islands. The oceanic islands of the Gulf of Guinea constitute an ‘intermediate island system’ (Melo 2007; Ricklefs and Bermingham 2007), whose biogeographical characteristics lie between very isolated and virtually independent systems, and those so close to the mainland that their diversity patterns are determined mostly by ecological factors. In addition, the diverse and species-rich ecosystems of West Africa and the Congo Basin to the north and east, respectively, provide ample sources for potential colonization to the Gulf of Guinea oceanic islands. This “surrounding landmass proportion” is not only very large, but it consists mostly of habitats that are similar to those of the islands themselves—the two most important parameters associated with an increased likelihood of successful colonization (Weigelt and Kreft 2013).
The linear arrangement of the Gulf of Guinea islands and the relatively large distances between them, which are similar to their distances from the African continent, appear to have favored independent colonizations from the mainland relative to dispersal between islands. Colonization by so many mainland species is expected to increase inter-specific competition, reducing the chances for adaptive radiation (Schluter 2000; Ricklefs and Bermingham 2007). Nevertheless, white-eyes (Zosteropidae) represent a five-species radiation in these islands (Melo et al. 2011—Box 21.2). Other instances of inter-island dispersal events leading to speciation include the Giant and Príncipe Golden weavers (Valente et al. 2020), and the Príncipe Sunbird Anabathmis hartlaubi and the Sao Tome Sunbird Dreptes thomensis (Rauri Bowie, unpublished data: sister species relationship supported by mitochondrial and nuclear markers.; MM and Luís Valente, unpublished data: sister species relationship supported by mitochondrial sequence data). Inter-island dispersal has also resulted in the differentiation of the Príncipe Seedeater into three subspecies (Jones and Tye 2006; Melo 2007). The distinct species of green-pigeons (Pereira 2013), scops-owls (Freitas 2019), thrushes (Melo et al. 2010), and Crithagra canaries (Melo et al. 2017) present on different islands may have been derived either from independent colonizations from the African continent or from inter-island dispersal. The same applies to the island subspecies of the Lemon Dove Columba larvata (Pereira 2013), and the Malachite Kingfisher (Melo and Fuchs 2008).
Although the proximity to a species-rich continent does increase the chances of successful colonizations, it also increases the probability that gene flow between island and mainland populations is maintained at levels that will prevent population divergence and eventual speciation. Hence, the most likely reason that the oceanic islands of the Gulf of Guinea support the highest concentration of endemic birds worldwide is their unique geographic location: they are close enough to the African continent to be colonized by a diverse array of species, but far enough to allow successful immigrants to evolve in isolation.
In summary, bird speciation in the oceanic islands of the Gulf of Guinea has in most cases occurred by independent divergence in allopatry (allospeciation: Mayr and Diamond 2001), when an immigrant population from the mainland reached one island and evolved there in isolation. This is the overwhelmingly dominant route for bird speciation on islands (Ricklefs and Bermingham 2007; Valente et al. 2020) and for birds in general (Price 2008). In addition, molecular data have now revealed previously unrecognized radiations on the islands, most remarkably among the white-eyes (Box 21.2). Although comprising only five species, this radiation may be the third largest globally for birds inhabiting small oceanic islands, and further stands out by having the fastest speciation rates recorded in birds and one of the highest in vertebrates (Appendix 5 in Melo et al. 2011).
Box 21.2: The Radiation of the White-Eyes (Zosteropidae) of the Oceanic Islands of the Gulf of Guinea
The spectacular radiations of the Hawaiian honeycreepers (Pratt 2005) and of the Galapagos finches (Grant and Grant 2008) could mislead us into believing that radiations are a common diversification process for birds on small oceanic islands—when they are in fact a very rare exception (Valente et al. 2020). The next largest oceanic island bird radiation worldwide is found in the Gulf of Guinea, where the five white-eyes species descend from a single ancestor that reached the islands within the last 0.7–1.1 my (Melo et al. 2011). Although modest in size, the white eye radiation boasts one of the fastest rates of speciation ever documented in vertebrates (Melo et al. 2011).
The radiation itself is a textbook example of the “archipelago radiation model” developed originally for island birds (Lack 1947; Grant 2001; Petren et al. 2005), which is also in agreement with current views of the speciation process (Rundle and Nosil 2005; Nosil 2012), where inter-specific competition is the engine of phenotypic diversification (numbers refer to photos below):
-
(I)
Descendants of the original colonization (6: mainland relative), island-hop and diverge in isolation (1, 3, 5).
-
(II)
Presumably because they occupy similar habitats, phenotypic changes are not pronounced—as illustrated by the Príncipe and São Tomé white-eyes (1, 3), which are indistinguishable in the field (Hering et al. 2018).
-
(III)
Inter-island dispersal events bring diverging populations together, setting the stage for inter-specific competition.
-
(IV)
The pressure of resource competition is felt more strongly in the outnumbered new arrivals. These undergo the most phenotypic change and at very fast rates. The most aberrant species of the group (2, 4) represent the most recent speciation events: they may have diverged from one another less than 0.3 mya and from a typical white-eye less than 0.5 mya—a timeframe typical of intra-specific but not inter-specific divergence in birds (Melo et al. 2011). This process of asymmetric divergence driven by resource competition has been predicted by theory (Doebeli and Dieckmann 2000) and is now empirically supported by the radiation of Darwin’s finches (Petren et al. 2005) and of the Gulf of Guinea white-eyes.
Systematics of the Endemic Birds: New Insights from Molecular Data
The taxonomy and systematics of the endemic birds of the Gulf of Guinea were mostly addressed by Amadon (1953) and Naurois (1994) and later summarized by Jones and Tye (2006). Evolutionary inferences were still then dependent on phenotypic data, and particularly on morphological traits, which are often adaptive and can quickly lose their phylogenetic signal. This issue is particularly problematic in birds (Bock 1967; Hafner et al. 1984) and on oceanic islands, where both rapid phenotypic evolution (Millien 2006; Melo et al. 2011; Garcia-Porta et al. 2016; Sendell-Price et al. 2020) and phenotypic convergence (Fleischer et al. 2008; Covas 2016; Benítez-López et al. 2021) are common. Molecular phylogenies are expected to constitute better hypotheses of evolutionary history than phenotype-based phylogenies, as they use genetic markers that are mostly independent from phenotypic traits, and not under direct selection (Bromham et al. 2002; Davies and Savolainen 2006).
The most important insight brought by molecular phylogenies was that most bird speciation events in the Gulf of Guinea islands are recent, having occurred since the late Pliocene (2.5 Ma—Table 21.4). The exceptions so far are the Príncipe and São Tomé thrushes and the Sao Tome Short-tail, which may have speciated in the mid-Pliocene (c. 3.5–4.0 Ma), and Dohrn’s Thrush-Babbler Sylvia dohrni, which may date back to the Miocene (c. 8 Ma—Table 21.4). Even without estimates of speciation times for some of the endemics, it is safe to conclude that the present species are all much more recent than the emergence of the islands they inhabit, which range from 31 to 6 Ma (Ceríaco et al. 2022). This pattern indicates that the oceanic islands of the Gulf of Guinea constitute a speciation center rather than a stable refuge for species that went extinct on the mainland. The absence of old species is nevertheless surprising and could be due to the recent and intense volcanic history of the islands (Lee et al. 1994; Barfod and Fitton 2014; Ceríaco et al. 2022). The patterns of genetic variation of the lizard Trachylepis thomensis within São Tomé have been linked to the impact of volcanic activity, with the extent of this variation being much lower than expected from the age of the island (Jesus et al. 2005). Likewise, volcanic activity on São Tomé has been linked to the evolutionary history of two sister caecilian lineages—Schistometopum ephele and S. thomense (O’Connell et al. 2021). In the absence of (sub)fossil evidence, it is not known if cycles of sea-level rise during post-glacial periods may have caused extinctions (Jones and Tye 2006; Ceríaco et al. 2022). Príncipe is likely to have been the most affected, having lost almost 90% of its land area as recently as 12,000 years ago (Norder et al. 2018). Likewise, during glacial periods Annobón was eight times larger, whereas the size of São Tomé did not change greatly. In any case, the relatively small sizes of the islands and their proximity to the mainland might make them susceptible to more rapid species turnover, which may further help explain the young age of most endemic bird species.
The main taxonomic consequence of the fast rates of phenotypic divergence inferred from molecular phylogenies is that all the endemic genera have been found invalid. This includes the Dohrn’s Thrush-Babbler and the Sao Tome Short-tail, formerly placed in the monotypic genera Horizorhinus and Amaurocichla, respectively, whose peculiar traits obscured to which families they belonged (i.e., classified as incertae sedis). Dohrn’s Thrush-Babbler, from Príncipe, is sister to a clade including the African Hill Babbler Sylvia abyssinica, an Afromontane forest species present also in the neighboring land-bridge island Bioko and Mount Cameroon (Voelker et al. 2009). In the case of the Sao Tome Short-tail, several of its traits, such as nine primaries (albeit a vestigial tenth primary is present) and ten rectrices with a protruding shaft, led to the suggestion that it could share an ancestor with the South-American Furnariidae (Naurois 1982). In actuality, it represents a recent speciation event from continental Africa, derived from the same ancestor as the Mountain Wagtail Motacilla clara, with which it shares the ecological niche of forest streams, and the Cape Wagtail M. capensis (Alström et al. 2015). The São Tomé Grosbeak, a Crithagra canary (Fringillidae) sister to the co-occurring Príncipe Seedeater (Moreau 1962; Melo et al. 2017), was originally placed in the monotypic genus Neospiza, and was often classified as a weaver (Ploceidae) (e.g., Bocage 1888b—he later placed it in Fringillidae: Bocage 1904; Sclater 1924; Bannerman 1953; Moreau 1962). The Sao Tome Weaver Ploceus sanctithomae, formerly in the endemic monotypic genus Thomasophantes (Amadon 1953; Moreau 1960; Naurois 1994), is now considered sister to the clade including the Forest Weaver Ploceus bicolor and the Red-headed Weaver Anaplectes rubriceps (Anaplectes being invalid as well; De Silva et al. 2019). The Sao Tome Sunbird is currently still classified under the only remaining endemic genus, Dreptes, which is known to be invalid, since the species is sister to the Príncipe Sunbird (genus Anabathmis) (Rauri Bowie, pers comm.; MM and Luís Valente, unpublished data). Finally, the genus Speirops, endemic to the Gulf of Guinea, is also no longer considered valid (Melo et al. 2011). It used to group four species of “aberrant” white-eyes (Zosteropidae): Black-capped Speirops Zosterops lugubris (São Tomé), Príncipe Speirops Z. leucophaeus, Bioko Speirops Z. brunneus, and Cameroon Speirops Z. melanocephalus (Mount Cameroon). However, molecular data show that the four species are not monophyletic and that the “aberrant” characters are the result of fast phenotypic divergence. On the oceanic islands, aberrant species represent the most recent speciation events (Box 21.2; Melo et al. 2011), rather than being derived from the oldest colonizations as previously assumed (Amadon 1953; Moreau 1957).
Conservation
The importance of the islands for conservation was first noted when the south-western forests of São Tomé were identified as the second most important for bird conservation in Africa (Collar and Stuart 1988). As a result, an IUCN-funded mission surveyed plants and vertebrates of São Tomé and Príncipe confirming the high endemism and the global importance of the biological diversity of the oceanic islands (Jones and Tye 1988; Jones et al. 1991; Jones 1994). For birds, each of the oceanic islands is listed by BirdLife International as an independent Endemic Bird Area (Stattersfield et al. 1998; BirdLife International 2021a). More recently, the moist lowland forests of Príncipe, São Tomé, and Annobón were identified as the third most important in the world for the conservation of forest birds (Buchanan et al. 2011), and the endemic birds were the main factor for the protected areas of São Tomé and Príncipe combined to be considered globally as the 17th most important protected area for the conservation of threatened species (Le Saout et al. 2013).
Some of the endemic birds were already extremely rare early in the twentieth century and remain at high risk, but only the Príncipe subspecies of the Olive Ibis Bostrychia olivacea rothschildi became extinct (de Lima and Melo 2021). The most recent assessment listed 14 threatened bird taxa for the islands (IUCN 2021): five Critically Endangered, including the Annobón Scops-Owl Otus feae—which we treat as a subspecies of O. senegalensis following Clements et al. (2021); four Endangered, including the Gray Parrot, which is common on Príncipe and the only non-endemic threatened bird on the islands (Valle et al. 2021); and five Vulnerable (Tables 21.2 and 21.3).
The number of threatened taxa has increased since 2000, when only nine were listed: three Critically Endangered (the Annobón Scops-Owl and the Príncipe Thrush were not recognized as species by IUCN), none Endangered (the Maroon Pigeon Columba thomensis was Vulnerable, the Príncipe and São Tomé white-eyes were treated as conspecific and Vulnerable, and the Sao Tome Green-Pigeon Treron sanctithomae and the Gray Parrot were Least Concern), and six were Vulnerable (including the Principe and Sao Tome white-eyes treated as the same taxon). Most of these changes have been due to improved knowledge and not necessarily to a deterioration of the situation of the species, despite indications that conditions might be worsening for several taxa (IUCN 2021). The conservation status of each bird species is reviewed every year (BirdLife International 2021b) and thus further changes are expected. Other taxa await assessment, namely all endemic subspecies and putative new species, many of which are likely to be threatened. These include the Boné de Jóquei Islet subspecies of the Principe Seedeater Crithagra rufobrunnea fradei, which has a highly restricted range (Melo 2007), the elusive Gulf of Guinea Band-rumped Storm-Petrel (Flood et al. 2019), and the Príncipe Scops-Owl, which is still being described but will likely classify as Critically Endangered (Freitas 2019).
Habitat loss, overexploitation, and introduced species are key threats to native birds both globally (IUCN 2021) and in the Gulf of Guinea. Given the habitat associations described in the previous section, forest loss and degradation are the main threats to the birds on these islands (e.g., Dallimer et al. 2012; Soares et al. 2020). Most of this habitat loss can be attributed to agricultural expansion and intensification (Oyono et al. 2014), both to supply the local markets (notably horticulture) and to produce export cash crops (e.g., cocoa, palm oil, and coffee). Logging, fire, mining, infrastructure development, urban and tourism expansion, livestock, and silviculture (e.g., oil palm wine and medicinal plants) also contribute to habitat loss. To halt ongoing habitat loss, it is vital to ensure the effective implementation of existing protected areas, and their possible expansion, since some important forests are not yet formally protected (BirdLife International 2020; de Lima et al. 2022). Furthermore, environmentally friendly practices should be promoted in extractive and agricultural activities to ensure that complex vegetation structures are not lost and that introduced species are kept under control (de Lima et al. 2014; Carvalho 2015).
Most bird species are hunted, but the effects of direct exploitation are more noticeable on larger species (de Lima et al. 2013), such as the Sao Tome Ibis (Sampaio et al. 2016; de Lima et al. 2017), pigeons (Palmeirim et al. 2013; Carvalho 2015; Fundação Príncipe 2019) and the Brown Booby (Bollen et al. 2018). The diffuse nature of hunting coupled with the rugged terrain makes it extremely difficult to enforce existing laws that regulate this activity (Albuquerque and Carvalho 2015a, b; de Lima et al. 2022). Given that bird hunting is mostly a cultural, commercial, and recreational activity that contributes little to protein intake, diverting hunting efforts to instead control populations of introduced mammals could have a dual positive effect on bird conservation (Carvalho 2015).
Introduced bird species are thought to be strongly associated with land-use intensification, having little or no impact on the native avifauna (Soares et al. 2020). On the other hand, the effects of introduced mammals (Dutton 1994) and plants (Figueiredo et al. 2011) have long been identified as potential threats, even though their impacts remain poorly understood (BirdLife International 2014a, b; Fundação Príncipe et al. 2021). Feral pigs and cows feed on understory plants and turn over the soil, disturbing key forest habitats that evolved in the absence of large terrestrial mammals. Rats Rattus sp. and Mona Monkeys Cercopithecus mona are likely to have direct effects through nest predation (Guedes et al. 2021). Introduced mammal and plant species also have the potential to change forest structure in the long term, namely through the disruption of seed dispersal and other processes linked to forest regeneration (Heleno et al. 2021).
Other factors, such as pollution and climate change have also been identified as potential threats to the endemic-rich avifauna of these islands (IUCN 2021). For example, the intensive use of insecticides was claimed to be responsible for a severe population crash of the Sao Tome Paradise Flycatcher Terpsiphone atrochalybeia in the 1970s (Naurois 1984a).
Because most threats to biodiversity act synergistically and often occur as a result of habitat loss, protecting the remaining native forest is the single most important measure to secure the future of these species (de Lima 2012). Fortunately, all the islands have significant proportions of their territory already dedicated to biodiversity conservation (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2021), and the protected area network is soon expected to expand to cover additional important habitats (BirdLife International 2020; de Lima et al. 2022). However, weak enforcement of environmental legislation remains a major concern (de Lima et al. 2017). Improving our knowledge of species ecology and of pervasive threats, such as hunting, invasive species, and climate change, will also be key to designing effective species-specific conservation measures. In this regard, conservation priorities in São Tomé and Príncipe have been identified through extended discussions, both for protected areas (Albuquerque and Carvalho 2015a, b) and for all Critically Endangered bird species (BirdLife International 2014a, b; Fundação Príncipe et al. 2021). Despite not being entirely fulfilled, these have been extremely useful in guiding conservation action, and continued revision will be essential. The success of ongoing conservation efforts ultimately relies on engaging the inhabitants of the islands, a process that is still in its infancy (de Lima et al. 2022). In this regard, birds are also being used to raise awareness locally and globally for the value of the unique biodiversity of the islands (e.g., Rebelo 2021; Ayres et al. 2022).
Concluding Remarks
The oceanic islands of the Gulf of Guinea constitute an outstanding example of an intermediate island system for birds, whose geographical location and rich rainforests maximize the accumulation of bird endemism. As such, they offer a valuable suite of phylogenetically independent replicates for testing hypotheses about evolutionary processes in speciation and adaptation. Knowledge gaps persist regarding Annobón and the status of some species, including potential undescribed endemics, past extinctions, and the origins of putative non-native species. Birds are still the best-known taxon in the archipelago, however, making them ideal exemplars that can guide future work on other groups. Our knowledge of environmental constraints and the history of human occupation of these islands also make them excellent models for understanding ecological processes and testing conservation strategies that can be used in a wider context, for instance in other small forested islands.
References
Albuquerque C, Carvalho A (2015a) 2015-2016 Plano de manejo. Parque Natural do Príncipe. RAPAC, ECOFAC V, São Tomé
Albuquerque C, Carvalho A (2015b) 2015-2016 Plano de manejo 2015/2020. Parque Natural Obô de São Tomé Obô Natural Park. RAPAC, ECOFAC V, São Tomé
Allen W, Thomson T (1848) A narrative of the expedition sent by Her Majesty’s Government to the River Niger in 1841 under the command of Captain H.D. Trotter. Richard Bentley, London
Alström P, Jønsson KA, Fjeldså J et al (2015) Dramatic niche shifts and morphological change in two insular bird species. Royal Society Open Science 2:140364
Alves JM (2019) Taxonomia, ecologia e conservação da coruja-das-torres de São Tomé (Tyto alba thomensis). MSc Thesis. University of Lisbon, Lisbon
Amadon D (1953) Avian systematics and evolution in the Gulf of Guinea. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 100:394–451
Anon. (1994) Tour d’horizon: le programme ECOFAC. Canopée 1:2–3
Atkinson P, Peet N, Alexander J (1991) The status and conservation of the endemic bird species of São Tomé and Príncipe, West Africa. Bird Conservation International 1:255–282
Atkinson PW, Dutton JS, Peet NB, Sequeira V (1994) A study of the birds, small mammals, turtles and medicinal plants of São Tomé with notes on Príncipe. Study Report 56. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK
Ayres R, Aragão JC, Carvalho M et al (2022) Environmental education in São Tomé and Príncipe: The challenges of owning a unique biodiversity. In: Bell RC, de Lima RF, Melo M, Ceríaco L (eds) Biodiversity of the Gulf of Guinea Oceanic Islands: science and conservation. Springer, Cham, pp 671–690
Azevedo FP (2015) How many dwarf olive ibises Bostrychia bocagei are there in São Tomé? Use of distance sampling and plot sampling to estimate the population of a Critically Endangered endemic bird. MSc thesis. University of Évora, Évora
Baillie JEM (2001) Persistence and vulnerability of island endemic birds. PhD thesis. University of London, London
Bannerman DA (1914) Report on the birds collected by the late Mr. Boyd Alexander (Rifle Brigade) during his last expedition to Africa. Part I. The birds of Prince’s Island. Ibis 2(10):596–631
Bannerman DA (1915a) Report on the birds collected by the late Mr. Boyd Alexander (Rifle Brigade) on his last expedition to Africa. Part II. The birds of St. Thomas’ Island. Ibis 3(10):89–121
Bannerman DA (1915b) Report on the birds collected by the late Mr. Boyd Alexander (Rifle Brigade) during his last expedition to Africa. Part III. The birds of Annobón Island. Ibis 3(10):227–234
Bannerman DA (1953) The birds of West and Equatorial Africa. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh
Baptista LF, Trail PW, Horblit HM, Kirwan GM, Garcia EFJ (2020) Lemon Dove (Columba larvata), version 1.0. In: Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, Juana E (eds) Birds of the world. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca
Barfod DN, Fitton JG (2014) Pleistocene volcanism on São Tomé, Gulf of Guinea, West Africa. Quaternary Geochronology 21:77–89
Basilio A (1957) Caza y pesca en Annobón. Aves de la isla. La pesca de la ballena. Instituto de Estudios Africanos, Madrid
Batista R, Olsson U, Andermann T et al (2020) Phylogenomics and biogeography of the world’s thrushes (Aves, Turdus): new evidence for a more parsimonious evolutionary history. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 287:20192400
Benítez-López A, Santini L, Gallego-Zamorano J et al (2021) The island rule explains consistent patterns of body size evolution in terrestrial vertebrates. Nature Ecology and Evolution 5:768–786
BirdLife International (2014a) International Species Action Plan for the conservation of Critically Endangered birds on São Tomé 2014-2018. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK
BirdLife International (2014b) Single Species Action Plan for the conservation of the Príncipe Thrush Turdus xanthorhynchus: 2014-2018. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK
BirdLife International (2020) Áreas de Alto Valor de Conservação em São Tomé e Príncipe: Uma breve revisão. ECOFAC VI, São Tomé
BirdLife International (2021a) Endemic bird areas. Available via BirdLife International. http://datazone.birdlife.org/eba. Accessed 16 Oct 2021
BirdLife International (2021b) Globally threatened bird forums. Available via BirdLife International. https://globally-threatened-bird-forums.birdlife.org. Accessed 20 Apr 2021
Bocage JVB (1867) Aves das possessões portuguezas da Africa occidental que existem no Museu de Lisboa. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes 1(2):129–153
Bocage JVB (1879) Subsídios para a fauna das possessões portuguezas d’África occidental. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes de Lisboa 7(26):85–96
Bocage JVB (1887a) Oiseaux nouveaux de l’île St. Thomé. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes de Lisboa 11(44):250–253
Bocage JVB (1887b) Lista das aves de S. Thomé colligidas pelo sr. Moller em 1885. O Instituto, Coimbra Série 2 34:562–565
Bocage JVB (1888a) Oiseaux nouveaux de l’île St. Thomé. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes 12(48):229–232
Bocage JVB (1888b) Sur un oiseau nouveau de St. Thomé de la famille Fringillidae. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes 12(47):148–150
Bocage JVB (1888c) Sur quelques oiseaux de l’île St. Thomé. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes 12(48):211–215
Bocage JVB (1889a) Breves considerações sobre a fauna de S. Thomé. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes Série 2 1(1):33–36
Bocage JVB (1889b) Sur deux espèces à ajoutter [sic] à la faune ornithologique de St. Thomé. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes Série 2 1(2):142–144
Bocage JVB (1889c) Aves da ilha de S. Thomé. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes Série 2 1(3):209–210
Bocage JVB (1891) Oiseaux de l’île St. Thomé. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes Série 2 2(6):77–87
Bocage JVB (1893a) Note sur deux oiseaux nouveaux de l’île Anno-Bom. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes Série 2 3:17–18
Bocage JVB (1893b) Mammiferos, aves e reptis da ilha de Anno-Bom. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes Série 2 3(9):43–46
Bocage JVB (1903) Contribution à la faune des quatre îles du Golfe de Guinée. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes Série 2 7(25):25–59
Bocage JVB (1904) Contribution à la faune des quatre îles du Golfe de Guinée. IV. Île de St. Thomé. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes Série 2 7(26):65–96
Bock WJ (1967) The use of adaptive characters in avian classification. In: Snow DW (ed) Proceedings of the XIV international ornithological congress. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 61–74
Bollen A, Matilde E, Barros N (2018) An updated assessment of the seabird populations breeding at Príncipe and Tinhosas. Ostrich 89:47–58
Bristol RM, Fabre P-H, Irestedt M et al (2013) Molecular phylogeny of the Indian Ocean Terpsiphone paradise flycatchers: Undetected evolutionary diversity revealed amongst island populations. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 67:336–347
Bromham L, Woolfit M, Lee MSY, Rambaut A (2002) Testing the relationship between morphological and molecular rates of change along phylogenies. Evolution 56:1921–1930
Buchanan GM, Donald PF, Butchart SHM (2011) Identifying priority areas for conservation: A global assessment for forest-dependent birds. PLoS One 6:e29080
Burlison J, Jones PJ (1988) A report on the forestry resources of the Democratic Republic of São Tomé & Príncipe. IUCN, Gland
Cai T, Cibois A, Alström P et al (2019) Near-complete phylogeny and taxonomic revision of the world’s babblers (Aves: Passeriformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 130:346–356
Carvalho M (2015) Hunting and conservation of forest pigeons in São Tomé. PhD thesis. University of Lisbon, Lisbon
Carvalho M, Fa JE, Rego FC et al (2014) Factors influencing the distribution and abundance of endemic pigeons on São Tomé Island (Gulf of Guinea). Bird Conservation International 25:71–86
Ceríaco L, Santos BS, Lima RF, Bell RC, Norder SJ, Melo M (2022) Physical geography of the Gulf of Guinea Oceanic Islands. In: Ceríaco L, Lima RF, Melo M, Bell RC (eds) Biodiversity of the Gulf of Guinea Oceanic Islands: science and conservation. Springer, Cham, pp 13–36
Christy P, Clarke WV (1998) Guide des oiseaux de São Tomé e Príncipe. ECOFAC, São Tomé
Christy P, Gascoigne A (1996) Principe Thrush rediscovered after more than 50 years. Gulf of Guinea Conservation Newsletter 4:2–3
Clements JF, Schulenberg TS, Iliff MJ et al (2021) The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: v2021. Available via the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download. Accessed 21 Oct 2021
Collar NJ, Boesman P (2020) The taxonomic status of Annobón Scops Owl Otus feae and Arabian Scops Owl O. pamelae. Bulletin of the African Bird Club 27:159–167
Collar NJ, Stuart SN (1985) Threatened birds of Africa and related islands. International Council for Bird Preservation and International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Cambridge, UK
Collar N, Stuart SN (1988) Key forests for threatened birds in Africa. ICBP Monograph 3. International Council for Bird Preservation & IUCN, The World Conservation Union, Cambridge, UK
Correia JG (1928–29) The abits of ceveral birds of San Thome and Principe Is. [sic] Unpublished typescript. Ornithological Archives, American Museum of Natural History, New York
Covas R (2016) Life history evolution in island populations of birds. In: Kilman R (ed) Encyclopedia of evolutionary biology. Academic Press, Oxford, UK, pp 352–358
Coyne JA, Price TD (2000) Little evidence for sympatric speciation in island birds. Evolution 54:2166–2171
Dallimer M, King T (2008) Habitat preferences of the forest birds on the island of Príncipe, Gulf of Guinea. African Journal of Ecology 46:258–266
Dallimer M, King T, Atkinson RJ (2009) Pervasive threats within a protected area: Conserving the endemic birds of São Tomé, West Africa. Animal Conservation 12:209–219
Dallimer M, Melo M, Collar NJ, Jones PJ (2010) The Príncipe thrush Turdus xanthorhynchus: A newly split, critically endangered, forest flagship species. Bird Conservation International 20:375–381
Dallimer M, Parnell M, Bicknell JE, Melo M (2012) The importance of novel and agricultural habitats for the avifauna of an oceanic island. Journal for Nature Conservation 20:191–199
Davies TJ, Savolainen V (2006) Neutral theory, phylogenies and the relationship between phenotypic change and evolutionary rates. Evolution 60:476–483
De Silva TN, Peterson AT, Perktas U (2019) An extensive molecular phylogeny of weaverbirds (Aves: Ploceidae) unveils broad nonmonophyly of traditional genera and new relationships. The Auk 136:ukz041
Doebeli M, Dieckmann U (2000) Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. American Naturalist 156:S77–S101
Dohrn H (1866) Synopsis of the birds of ilha do Principe, with some remarks on their habits and descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the Scientific Meetings of the Zoological Society of London 34(1):324–332
Dutton J (1994) Introduced mammals in São Tomé and Príncipe: Possible threats to biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 3:927–938
Eccles SD (1988) The birds of São Tomé—record of a visit, April 1987 with notes on the rediscovery of Bocage’s Longbill. Malimbus 10:207–217
Figueiredo E, Paiva J, Stévart T, Oliveira F, Smith GF (2011) Annotated catalogue of the flowering plants of São Tomé and Príncipe. Bothalia 41:41–82
Fleischer RC, James HF, Olson SL (2008) Convergent evolution of Hawaiian and Australo-Pacific honeyeaters from distant songbird ancestors. Current Biology 18:1927–1931
Flood R, Lima RF, Melo M, Verbelen P, Wagstaff W (2019) What is known about the enigmatic Gulf of Guinea band-rumped storm-petrels (Hydrobates cf. castro)? Bull Br Ornithol Club 139:173–186
Frade F (1958) Aves e mamíferos das ilhas de São Tomé e do Príncipe—Notas de sistemática e de protecção à fauna. Conferência Internacional de Africanistas Ocidentais, 6ª Sessão, Comunicações 4:137–149
Frade F (1959) New records of non-resident birds, and notes on some resident ones, in São Tomé and Príncipe islands. In: Proceedings of the 1st international Pan-African Ornithological Congress. Ostrich Supplement, pp 317–320
Frade F, Santos JV (1977) Aves de São Tomé e Príncipe (colecção do Centro de Zoologia). Garcia de Orta, Série de Zoologia 6:3–18
Freitas B (2019) The mystery Scops owl of Príncipe Island: Combining evidence for a species description and assessment of its conservation status. MSc Thesis. University of Porto, Porto
Fry CH (1961) Notes on the birds of Annobón and other islands in the Gulf of Guinea. Ibis 103a:267–276
Fuchs J, Crowe TM, Bowie RCK (2011) Phylogeography of the fiscal shrike (Lanius collaris): a novel pattern of genetic structure across the arid zones and savannas of Africa. Journal of Biogeography 38:2210–2222
Fuchs J, De Swardt DH, Oatley G, Fjeldså J, Bowie RCK (2018) Habitat-driven diversification, hybridization and cryptic diversity in the Fork-tailed Drongo (Passeriformes: Dicruridae: Dicrurus adsimilis). Zoologica Scripta 47:266–284
Fundação Príncipe (2019) Understanding the remarkable biodiversity of Príncipe Island—Scientific Report. Fundação Príncipe, Santo António
Fundação Príncipe, Fauna & Flora International, SPEA, BirdLife International (2021) Segundo Plano de Ação para a conservação do Tordo-do-Príncipe Turdus xanthorhynchus 2021-2025. Fundação Príncipe, Fauna & Flora International, SPEA, BirdLife International, Santo António do Príncipe
Garcia-Porta J, Šmíd J, Sol D, Fasola M, Carranza S (2016) Testing the island effect on phenotypic diversification: Insights from the Hemidactylus geckos of the Socotra archipelago. Scientific Reports 6:23729
Gill F, Donsker D, Rasmussen P (2021) IOC World Bird List (v11.1). Available via https://www.worldbirdnames.org/. Accessed 21 Oct 2021
Grant PR (2001) Reconstructing the evolution of birds on islands: 100 years of research. Oikos 92:385–403
Grant PR, Grant BR (2008) How and why species multiply: The radiation of Darwin’s finches. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Guedes P, Santos Y, Lima RF, Bird TLF (2021) Introduced Mona monkey is a key threat to the critically endangered Príncipe thrush. Oryx 55:809
Günther R, Feiler A (1985) Die Vögel der Insel São Tomé. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin. Supplement Annalen für Ornithologie 61(9):3–28
Hafner MS, Remsen JV Jr, Laynon SM (1984) Birds versus mammal morphological differentiation. Evolution 38:1154–1156
Harrison MJS (1990) A recent survey of the birds of Pagalu (Annobón). Malimbus 11:135–143
Hartlaub G (1850) Beitrag zur Ornithologie Westafrica’s. Verzeichniss der öffentlichen und Privat-Vorlesungen. Hamburger Akademisches Gymnasium, Hamburg
Hartlaub G (1857) System der Ornithologie Westafrica’s. Shünemann, Bremen
HBW and BirdLife International (2021) Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 5. Available via BirdLife International. http://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v5_Dec20.zip. Accessed 21 Oct 2021
Heleno RB, Mendes F, Coelho AP et al (2021) The upsizing of the São Tomé seed dispersal network by introduced animals. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.08279
Hering J, Hering H, Lima R, Melo M (2018) Little-known African bird: Príncipe White-eye Zosterops ficedulinus—a rare island endemic. Bull Afr Bird Club 25:75–78
Hoyo J (2020) All the birds of the world. Lynx Edicíons, Barcelona
Hoyo J, Baptista LF, Collar N et al (2020) African Green-Pigeon (Treron calvus), version 1.0. In: Billerman SM, Keeney BK, Rodewald PG, Schulenberg TS (eds) Birds of the world. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca
IUCN (2015) Ecosystem profile: Guinean Forests of West Africa biodiversity hotspot. Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Arlington
IUCN (2021) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Version 2020-1. Available via International Union for Conservation of Nature. https://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 11 Apr 2021
Jesus J, Harris DJ, Brehm A (2005) Phylogeography of Mabuya maculilabris (Reptilia) from São Tomé Island (Gulf of Guinea) inferred from mtDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37:503–510
Jones PJ (1994) Biodiversity in the Gulf of Guinea: An overview. Biodiversity and Conservation 3:772–784
Jones PJ, Tye A (1988) A survey of the avifauna of São Tomé and Príncipe. Study Report 24. International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, UK
Jones PJ, Tye A (2006) The Birds of São Tomé and Príncipe, with Annobón: Islands of the Gulf of Guinea. BOU Checklist No. 22. British Ornithologists’ Union & British Ornithologists’ Club, Oxford, UK
Jones PJ, Burlinson JP, Tye A (1991) Conservação dos ecossistemas florestais na República Democrática de São Tomé e Príncipe. IUCN, Gland
Jønsson KA, Blom MPK, Marki PZ et al (2019) Complete subspecies-level phylogeny of the Oriolidae (Aves: Passeriformes): Out of Australasia and return. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 137:200–209
Keulemans JG (1866) Opmerkingen over de vogels van de Kaap-Verdische eilanden en van Prins-Eiland in de Bogt van Guinea gelegen. Nederlandsch Tijdschrift Voor De Dierkunde 3:374–401
Lack D (1947) Darwin’s Finches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Lee D-C, Halliday AN, Fitton JG, Poli G (1994) Isotopic variations with distance and time in the volcanic islands of the Cameroon line: Evidence for a mantle plume origin. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 123:119–138
Lerner HRL, Meyer M, James HF, Hofreiter M, Fleischer RC (2011) Multilocus resolution of phylogeny and timescale in the extant adaptive radiation of Hawaiian Honeycreepers. Current Biology 21:1838–1844
Le Saout S, Hoffmann M, Shi Y et al (2013) Protected areas and effective biodiversity conservation. Science 342:803–805
Leventis AP, Olmos F (2009) As aves de São Tomé e Príncipe: um guia fotográfico / The birds of São Tomé and Príncipe: a photoguide. Aves e Foto Editora, São Paulo
Lewis TC, Melo M, Lima RF, Bremner-Harrison S (2018) Habitat associations of the critically endangered São Tomé fiscal Lanius newtoni: comparing standard and playback-confirmed point counts. Afr J Ecol 56:404–408
Lima RF (2012) Land-use management and the conservation of endemic species in São Tomé Island. PhD Thesis. University of Lancaster, Lancaster
Lima RF, Melo M (2021) Revised bird checklist for the Gulf of Guinea oceanic islands (Central Africa). Bull Br Ornithol Club 141:179–198
Lima RF, Dallimer M, Atkinson PW, Barlow J (2013) Biodiversity and land-use change: understanding the complex responses of an endemic-rich bird assemblage. Divers Distrib 19:411–422
Lima RF, Viegas L, Solé N et al (2014) Can management improve the value of shade plantations for the endemic species of São Tomé Island? Biotropica 46:238–247
Lima RF, Sampaio H, Dunn JC et al (2017) Distribution and habitat associations of the critically endangered bird species of São Tomé Island (Gulf of Guinea). Bird Conserv Int 27:455–469
Lima RF, Martins M, Rocha N, Santos Y (2021) Country report: international Waterbird Census (IWC) January 2021 count in São Tomé and Príncipe. Gulf of Guinea Bodiversity Center, BirdLife International, Fauna & Flora International, Fundação Príncipe, São Tomé
Lima RF, Deffontaines J-B, Madruga L, Matilde E, Nuno A, Vieira S (2022) Biodiversity conservation in the Gulf of Guinea oceanic islands: recent progress, ongoing challenges, and future directions. In: Ceríaco L, Lima RF, Melo M, Bell RC (eds) Biodiversity of the Gulf of Guinea Oceanic Islands: science and conservation. Springer, Cham, pp 643–670
Maia HA, Alberto AC (2009) The occurrence of São Tomé short-tail Amaurocichla bocagii and Newton’s fiscal Lanius newtoni in the montane forests of São Tomé. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 129:213–216
Margarido NCI (2015) Habitat selection by the Dwarf Olive Ibis Bostrychia bocagei, a critically endangered bird endemic to São Tomé Island. MSc Thesis. University of Évora, Évora
Mayr E (1965) Avifauna: Turnover on islands. Science 150:1587–1588
Mayr E, Diamond JM (2001) The birds of northern Melanesia: Speciation, ecology, and biogeography. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Melo M (2007) Bird speciation in the Gulf of Guinea. PhD thesis. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
Melo M, Fuchs J (2008) Phylogenetic relationships of the Gulf of Guinea Alcedo kingfishers. Ibis 150:633–639
Melo M, O’Ryan C (2007) Genetic differentiation between Príncipe Island and mainland populations of the grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), and implications for conservation. Molecular Ecology 16:1673–1685
Melo M, Bowie RCK, Voelker G et al (2010) Multiple lines of evidence support the recognition of a very rare bird species: The Príncipe thrush. Journal of Zoology 282:120–129
Melo M, Warren BH, Jones PJ (2011) Rapid parallel evolution of aberrant traits in the diversification of the Gulf of Guinea white-eyes (Aves, Zosteropidae). Molecular Ecology 20:4953–4967
Melo M, Stervander M, Hansson B, Jones PJ (2017) The endangered São Tomé Grosbeak Neospiza concolor is the world’s largest canary. Ibis 159:673–679
Millien V (2006) Morphological evolution is accelerated among island mammals. PLoS Biology 4:e321
Monteiro LR, Covas R, Melo M et al (1997) Seabirds of São Tomé e Príncipe. Unpublished report. University of the Azores, BirdLife International, Horta and Cambridge, UK
Moreau RE (1957) Variation in the western Zosteropidae (Aves). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology 4:309–433
Moreau RE (1960) Conspectus and classification of the ploceine weaver-birds. Ibis 102:298–321
Moreau RE (1962) Ploceinae. In: Mayr E, Paynter RA (eds) Peter’s check-list of the birds of the world, vol 15. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MA, p 32
Nadler T (1993) Beiträge zur Avifauna der Insel São Tomé (Golf von Guinea). Faunistische Abhandlungen Staatliches Museum für Tierkunde Dresden 19:37–58
Naurois R (1972a) Avifaune terrestre et de rivages. Boletim da Brigada de Fomento Agro-Pecuário de São Tomé e Príncipe 6(23):29–42
Naurois R (1972b) Noms portugais et noms indigènes des oiseaux de São Tomé et Príncipe. Boletim da Brigada de Fomento Agro-Pecuário de São Tomé e Príncipe 6(23):43–46
Naurois R (1973a) L’avifaune marine des îles de São Tomé et de Principe. Boletim da Brigada de Fomento Agro-Pecuário de São Tomé e Príncipe 7(27):33–43
Naurois R (1973b) Les ibis des îles de S. Tomé et du Prince: Leur place dans le groupe des Bostrychia (=Lampribis). Arquivos do Museu Bocage 4(2):157–173
Naurois R (1975a) Les Carduelinae des îles de São Tomé et Principe (Golfe de Guinée). Ardeola 21:903–931
Naurois R (1975b) Le “Scops” de l’île de São Tomé Otus hartlaubi (Giebel). Bonner Zoologische Beiträge 26:319–355
Naurois R (1979) The Emerald Cuckoo of São Tomé and Príncipe islands (Gulf of Guinea). Ostrich 50:88–93
Naurois R (1980) Le statut de Halcyon malimbicus dryas Hartlaub (Île du Prince, Golfe de Guinée). Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Afrique Noire 42A:608–618
Naurois R (1981) Les Phasianidae de l’île de São Tomé. Cyanopica 2:29–36
Naurois R (1982) Une énigme ornithologique: Amaurocichla bocagii Sharpe, 1982. Bulletin de l’Institut Français de l’Afrique Noire 44A:200–212
Naurois R (1983a) Les oiseaux reproducteurs des îles de São Tomé et Principe: Liste systématique commentée et indications zoogéographiques. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge 34:129–148
Naurois R (1983b) Falconidae, Psittacidae et Strigiformes des îles de São Tomé et Principe. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge 34:429–451
Naurois R (1984a) Les Turdus des îles de São Tomé et Principe: T. o. olivaceofuscus (Hartlaub) et T. olivaceofuscus xanthorhynchus Salvadori (Aves Turdinae). Revue de Zoologie Africaine 98:403–423
Naurois R (1984b) La moucherolle endémique de l’île de São Tomé, Terpsiphone atrochalybeia (Thomson 1842). Alauda 52:31–44
Naurois R (1984c) Prinia molleri Bocage, 1887, endémique de l’île de São Tomé. Rivista Italiana di Ornitologia 54:191–206
Naurois R (1984d) Le loriot endémique de l’île de São Tomé (Golfe de Guinée) Oriolus crassirostris (Hartlaub). Cyanopica 3:121–134
Naurois R (1985) Chaetura (Rhaphidura) thomensis Hartert 1900 endémique des îles de São Tomé et Príncipe (Golfe de Guinée). Alauda 53:209–222
Naurois R (1987a) Les Rallidae des îles de São Tomé et du Prince (Golfe de Guinée). Cyanopica 4:5–26
Naurois R (1987b) Phalacrocoracidae et Ardeidae dans les îles de São Tomé et du Prince (Golfe de Guinée). Cyanopica 4:27–54
Naurois R (1987c) Notes on Dicrurus m. modestus (Hartlaub) and remarks on the modestus and adsimilis groups of drongos. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge 38:87–93
Naurois R (1988a) Neospiza concolor (Bocage, 1888): Endémique de l’île de São Tomé (Golfe de Guinée). Bollettino del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali (Torino) 6:321–339
Naurois R (1988b) Les Columbidae des îles de S. Tomé et Príncipe. Cyanopica 4:217–242
Naurois R (1988c) Note sur la pie-grièche Lanius newtoni (Bocage 1891), endémique de l’île de São Tomé (Golfe de Guinée). Cyanopica 4:251–259
Naurois R (1994) Les Oiseaux des Iles du Golfe de Guinée / As Aves das Ilhas do Golfo da Guiné. Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical, Lisboa
Naurois R, Castro Antunes LJ (1973) Repartição geográfica das espécies ornitológicas endémicas de São Tomé e Príncipe. Boletim da Brigada de Fomento Agro-Pecuário de São Tomé e Príncipe 7(27):17–31
Naurois R, Wolters HE (1975) The affinities of the São Tomé Weaver Textor grandis (Gray, 1844). Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 95:122–126
Newbold T, Scharlemann JPW, Butchart SHM et al (2013) Ecological traits affect the response of tropical forest bird species to land-use intensity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280:20122131
Norder SJ, Baumgartner JB, Borges PAV et al (2018) A global spatially explicit database of changes in island palaeo-area and archipelago configuration during the late Quaternary. Global Ecology and Biogeography 27:500–505
Nosil P (2012) Ecological speciation. Oxford series in ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
O’Connell KA, Prates I, Scheinberg LA, Mulder KP, Bell RC (2021) Speciation and secondary contact in a fossorial island endemic, the São Tomé caecilian. Molecular Ecology 30:2859–2871
Oyono PR, Morelli TL, Sayer J et al (2014) Allocation and use of forest land: current trends, issues and perspectives. In: Wassinger C, Flynn J, Louppe D, Hiol FH, Mayaux P (eds) The forests of the Congo Basin—state of the forests 2013. Observatoire des Fôrets d’Afrique Centrale of the Comission des Fôrets d’Afrique Centrale and Congo Basin Forest Partnership, Weyrich, pp 215–240
Palmeirim J, Meyer C, Costa AF et al (2013) Endemic pigeons of São Tomé: Developing science-based conservation and sustainable use of African forest pigeons. University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Centro de Biologia Ambiental
Peet NB, Atkinson P (1994) The biodiversity and conservation of the birds of São Tomé and Príncipe. Biodiversity and Conservation 3:851–867
Pereira H (2013) Conservation genetics of the endemic pigeons of São Tomé and Príncipe. MSc Thesis. University of Porto, Porto
Pérez del Val J (2001) A survey of birds of Annobón Island, Equatorial Guinea: Preliminary report. Bulletin of the African Bird Club 8:54
Petren K, Grant PR, Grant BR, Keller LF (2005) Comparative landscape genetics and the adaptive radiation of Darwin’s finches: The role of peripheral isolation. Molecular Ecology 14:2943–2957
Pratt HD (2005) The Hawaiian honeycreepers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Price T (2008) Speciation in birds. Roberts and Company, Greenwood Village
Rebelo GRV (2021) Habitat and population estimates of Príncipe flagship species: Príncipe Thrush Turdus xanthorhynchus, and Obô Giant Snail Archachatina bicarinata. MSc thesis. University of Lisbon, Lisbon
Ricklefs RE, Bermingham E (2007) The causes of evolutionary radiations in archipelagoes: Passerine birds in the Lesser Antilles. American Naturalist 169:285–297
Rodriguez-Prieto I, Osa-Akara LB, Ondo-Nguema E, Sima T, Abeso E (2014) Status of the Annobón Scops Owl: Report version 1.1. Universidad Nacional de Guinea Ecuatorial, Malabo
Rundle HD, Nosil P (2005) Ecological speciation. Ecology Letters 8:336–352
Salvadori T (1903a) Contribuzioni alla ornithologia delle isole del Golfo di Guinea. I. Uccelli dell’isola de Principe. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino Series 2 53:1–16
Salvadori T (1903b) Contribuzione alla ornitologia delle isole del Golfo di Guinea II: Uccelli di San Thomé. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino Series 2 53:17–45
Salvadori T (1903c) Contribuzioni alla ornithologia delle isole del Golfo di Guinea. III. Uccelli di Anno-Bom e di Fernando Po. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino Series 2 53:93–125
Sampaio HAL, de Lima RF, Ward-Francis A, Havery SJ (2016) Hunters and the Critically Endangered Dwarf Olive Ibis, endemic to São Tomé. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK
Schluter D (2000) The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Sclater WL (1924) Systema Avium Ethiopicarum: A systematic list of the birds of the Ethiopian region. Part 1. British Ornithologists Union, Tring
Sendell-Price AT, Ruegg KC, Clegg SM (2020) Rapid morphological divergence following a human-mediated introduction: The role of drift and directional selection. Heredity 124:535–549
Sergeant DE, Gullick T, Turner DA, Sinclair JCI (1992) The rediscovery of the São Tomé Grosbeak Neospiza concolor in south-western São Tomé. Bird Conservation International 2:157–159
Serle W (1959) The West African races of the Lemon-Dove Aplopelia larvata (Temm. and Knip). Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 79:38–41
Sloan B (2017) Bird records from Annobón, Equatorial Guinea, October 2016, including the first Squacco Heron Ardeola ralloides. Bulletin of the African Bird Club 24:209–212
Snow DW (1950) The birds of São Tomé and Principe in the Gulf of Guinea. Ibis 92:579–558
Soares FM (2017) Modelling the distribution of São Tomé bird species: Ecological determinants and conservation prioritization. MSc thesis. University of Lisbon, Lisbon
Soares FC, Panisi M, Sampaio H et al (2020) Land-use intensification promotes non-native species in a tropical island bird assemblage. Animal Conservation 23:573–584
Solé N, Alberto A, Samba S, Santana A, Lima RF (2012) New hope for the critically endangered São Tomé Grosbeak Neospiza concolor, and an alert to protect Obô Natural Park surroundings. Ostrich 83:161–164
Stattersfield AJ, Crosby MJ, Long AJ, Wedge DC (1998) Endemic bird areas of the world: Priorities for biodiversity conservation. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK
UNEP–WCMC, IUCN (2021) Protected planet: the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Available via www.protectedplanet.net. Accessed 4 May 2021
Uva V, Päckert M, Cibois A, Fumagalli L, Roulin A (2018) Comprehensive molecular phylogeny of barn owls and relatives (Family: Tytonidae), and their six major Pleistocene radiations. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 125:127–137
Valente L, Phillimore AB, Melo M et al (2020) A simple dynamic model explains the diversity of island birds worldwide. Nature 579:92–96
Valle S, Barros N, Ramírez I, Wanless RM (2016) Population estimates of the breeding birds of the Tinhosas islands (Gulf of Guinea), the only major seabird colony of the eastern tropical Atlantic. Ostrich 87:209–215
Valle S, Collar N, Harris W, Marsden S (2017) Spatial and seasonal variation in abundance within an insular grey parrot population. African Journal of Ecology 55:433–442
Valle S, Collar NJ, Melo M, Marsden SJ (2021) What can the abundance of Grey Parrots on Príncipe Island tell us about large parrot conservation? Journal of Tropical Ecology 36:293–297
Verbelen P, Melo M, Sangster G, Spina F (2016) A 90-year-old mystery solved: A potentially new species of owl from Príncipe. Oryx 50:581
Vieira L (1887) Aves da ilha de S. Thomé. O Instituto, Coimbra Série 2 34:562–565
Voelker G, Melo M, Bowie RCK (2009) A Gulf of Guinea island endemic is a member of a Mediterranean-centred bird genus. Ibis 151:180–183
Weigelt P, Kreft H (2013) Quantifying island isolation—insights from global patterns of insular plant species richness. Ecography 36:417–419
Weir JT, Schluter D (2008) Calibrating the avian molecular clock. Molecular Ecology 17:2321–2328
Acknowledgments
MM was supported via the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement 854248. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) provided structural funding to CIBIO (UIDB/50027/2021: to MM) and to cE3c (UID/BIA/00329/2021: to RFL). We thank Lars Petersson, Jake Selby, and Paul van Giersbergen for permission to use their excellent photos. We thank the reviewers Peter Ryan, Jacob Cooper, and the editor Rayna Bell for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Checklist of bird species on the oceanic islands of the Gulf of Guinea, excluding vagrant and unconfirmed species (de Lima and Melo 2021). Islands: P, Príncipe; S, São Tomé; A, Annobón. Status: E, endemic species; I, probably non-native; R, native non-endemic resident; S, endemic subspecies; X, extinct; B, breeding migrant; M, non-breeding migrant; ?, uncertain. Subspecies are only identified when they are endemic. Taxonomy and nomenclature follow Clements et al. (2021)
Higher taxonomy | Species/subspecies | P | S | A |
---|---|---|---|---|
Order Galliformes | ||||
Family Numididae | ||||
Numida Linnaeus, 1764 | N. meleagris (Linnaeus, 1758) | I | I | |
Family Phasianidae | ||||
Coturnix Garsault, 1764 | C. delegorguei histrionica (Hartlaub, 1849) | S | ||
Pternistis Wagler, 1832 | P. afer (Müller, PLS, 1776) | I | ||
Gallus Brisson, 1760 | G. gallus (Linnaeus, 1758) | I | ||
Order Columbiformes | ||||
Family Columbidae | ||||
Columba Linnaeus, 1758 | C. livia Gmelin, 1789 | I | I | |
C. thomensis Bocage, 1888 | E | |||
C. malherbii Verreaux & Verreaux, 1851 | E | E | E | |
C. larvata inornata (Reichenow, 1892) | S | |||
C. l. principalis (Hartlaub, 1866) | E | |||
C. l. simplex (Hartlaub, 1849) | E | |||
Streptopelia Bonaparte, 1855 | S. senegalensis (Linnaeus, 1766) | I | I | |
Treron Vieillot, 1816 | T. sanctithomae (Gmelin, 1789) | E | ||
T. calvus virescens Amadon, 1953 | S | |||
Order Cuculiformes | ||||
Family Cuculidae | ||||
Chrysococcyx Boie, F., 1826 | C. cupreus insularum Moreau & Chapin, 1951 | S | S | S |
Order Caprimulgiformes | ||||
Family Apodidae | ||||
Zoonavena Mathews, 1918 | Zoonavena thomensis (Hartert, 1900) | E | E | |
Apus Scopoli, 1777 | A. affinis bannermani Hartert, 1928 | S | S | |
Cypsiurus Lesson, R., 1843 | C. parvus (Lichtenstein, 1823) | I | I | |
Order Gruiformes | ||||
Family Rallidae | ||||
Paragallinula Sangster, Garcia-R & Trewick, 2015 | P. angulata (Sundevall, 1851) | ? | ? | |
Gallinula Brisson, 1760 | G. chloropus (Linnaeus, 1758) | R | R | R |
Order Charadriiformes | ||||
Family Scolopacidae | ||||
Numenius Brisson, 1760 | N. phaeopus (Linnaeus, 1758) | M | M | M |
Actitis Illiger, 1811 | A. hypoleucos (Linnaeus, 1758) | M | M | |
Tringa Linnaeus, 1758 | T. nebularia (Gunnerus, 1767) | M | M | |
Family Laridae | ||||
Anous Stephens, 1826 | A. stolidus (Linnaeus, 1758) | B | B | B |
A. minutus Boie, F., 1844 | B | ? | B | |
Onychoprion Wagler, 1832 | O. fuscatus (Linnaeus, 1766) | B | ? | ? |
O. anaethetus (Scopoli, 1786) | ? | ? | B | |
Order Phaethontiformes | ||||
Family Phaethontidae | ||||
Phaethon Linnaeus, 1758 | P. lepturus Daudin, 1802 | B | B | B |
P. aethereus Linnaeus, 1758 | ? | |||
Order Procellariiformes | ||||
Family Oceanitidae | ||||
Hydrobates Boie, F., 1822 | H. cf. castro (Harcourt, 1851) | ? | ||
Order Suliformes | ||||
Family Sulidae | ||||
Sula Brisson, 1760 | S. leucogaster (Boddaert, 1783) | B | B | ? |
Family Phalacrocoracidae | ||||
Microcarbo Bonaparte, 1856 | Microcarbo africanus (Gmelin, J. F., 1789) | R | ||
Order Pelecaniformes | ||||
Family Ardeidae | ||||
Egretta T. Forster, 1817 | E. gularis (Bosc, 1792) | R | R | R |
Bubulcus Bonaparte, 1855 | B. ibis (Linnaeus, 1758) | R | R | |
Butorides Blyth, 1852 | B. striata (Linnaeus, 1758) | R | R | |
Family Threskiornithidae | ||||
Bostrychia G. R. Gray, 1847 | B. olivacea rothschildi (Bannerman, 1919) | X | ||
B. bocagei Chapin, 1923 | E | |||
Order Accipitriformes | ||||
Family Accipitridae | ||||
Milvus Lacépède, 1799 | M. migrans (Boddaert, 1783) | R | R | |
Order Strigiformes | ||||
Family Tytonidae | ||||
Tyto Billberg, 1828 | T. alba thomensis (Hartlaub, 1852) | S | ||
Family Strigidae | ||||
Otus Pennant, 1769 | O. hartlaubi (Giebel, 1849) | E | ||
O. senegalensis feae (Salvadori, 1903) | S | |||
Otus sp. nov. | E | |||
Order Coraciiformes | ||||
Family Alcedinidae | ||||
Corythornis Kaup, 1848 | C. cristatus thomensis (Salvadori, 1902) | S | ||
C. cristatus nais (Kaup, 1848) | S | |||
Halcyon Swainson, 1821 | H. malimbica dryas Hartlaub, 1854 | S | ||
Ceryle F. Boie, 1828 | C. rudis (Linnaeus, 1758) | ? | ||
Order Psittaciformes | ||||
Family Psittaculidae | ||||
Agapornis Selby, 1836 | A. pullarius (Linnaeus, 1758) | I | ||
Family Psittacidae | ||||
Psittacus Linnaeus, 1758 | P. erithacus princeps Alexander, 1909 | S | I | |
Order Passeriformes | ||||
Family Oriolidae | ||||
Oriolus Linnaeus, 1766 | O. crassirostris Hartlaub, 1857 | E | ||
Family Dicruridae | ||||
Dicrurus Vieillot, 1816 | D. modestus modestus Hartlaub, 1849 | S | ||
Family Monarchidae | ||||
Terpsiphone Gloger, 1827 | T. atrochalybeia (Thomson, 1842) | E | ||
T. rufiventer smithii (Fraser, 1843) | S | |||
Family Laniidae | ||||
Lanius Linnaeus, 1758 | L. newtoni Bocage, 1891 | E | ||
Family Cisticolidae | ||||
Prinia Horsfield, 1821 | P. molleri Bocage, 1887 | E | ||
Family Hirundinidae | ||||
Hirundo Linnaeus, 1758 | H. rustica (Linnaeus, 1758) | M | ||
Family Sylvidae | ||||
Sylvia Scopoli, 1769 | S. dohrni (Hartlaub, 1866) | E | ||
Family Zosteropidae | ||||
Zosterops Vigors & Horsfield, 1827 | Z. ficedulinus Hartlaub, 1866 | E | ||
Z. griseovirescens Bocage, 1893 | E | |||
Z. feae Salvadori, 1901 | E | |||
Z. lugubris (Hartlaub, 1848) | E | |||
Z. leucophaeus (Hartlaub, 1857) | E | |||
Family Sturnidae | ||||
Onychognathus Hartlaub, 1849 | O. fulgidus fulgidus (Hartlaub, 1849) | S | ||
Lamprotornis Temminck, 1820 | L. splendidus (Vieillot, 1822) | R | ||
L. ornatus (Daudin, 1800) | E | |||
Family Turdidae | ||||
Turdus Linnaeus, 1758 | T. xanthorhynchus Salvadori, 1901 | E | ||
T. olivaceofuscus Hartlaub, 1852 | E | |||
Family Nectariniidae | ||||
Anabathmis Reichenow, 1905 | A. hartlaubii (Hartlaub, 1857) | E | ||
A. newtonii (Bocage, 1887) | E | |||
Dreptes Illiger, 1811 | D. thomensis (Bocage, 1889) | E | ||
Cyanomitra Reichenbach, 1853 | C. olivacea (Smith, 1840) | R | ||
Family Ploceidae | ||||
Ploceus Cuvier, 1816 | P. princeps (Bonaparte, 1851) | E | ||
P. velatus Vieillot, 1819 | I | |||
P. cucullatus (Müller, 1766) | I | |||
P. grandis (G. R. Gray, 1844) | E | |||
P. sanctithomae (Hartlaub, 1848) | E | |||
Quelea Reichenbach, 1850 | Q. erythrops (Hartlaub, 1848) | ? | ||
Euplectes Swainson, 1829 | E. hordeaceus (Linnaeus, 1758) | I | ||
E. aureus (Gmelin, 1789) | I | |||
E. albonotatus (Cassin, 1848) | I | |||
Family Estrildidae | ||||
Nigrita Strickland, 1843 | N. bicolor (Hartlaub, 1844) | R | ||
Estrilda Swainson, 1827 | E. astrild (Linnaeus, 1758) | I | I | |
Uraeginthus Cabanis, 1851 | U. angolensis (Linnaeus, 1758) | I | ||
Spermestes Swainson, 1837 | S. cucullata (Swainson, 1837) | I | I | I |
Family Viduidae | ||||
Vidua Cuvier, 1816 | V. macroura (Pallas, 1764) | I | ||
Family Motacillidae | ||||
Motacilla Linnaeus, 1758 | Motacilla bocagii (Sharpe, 1892) | E | ||
Family Fringillidae | ||||
Crithagra Swainson, 1827 | C. mozambica (Müller, 1776) | I | ||
C. rufobrunneaa (Gray, 1862) | E | |||
C. concolor (Bocage, 1888) | E |
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Melo, M., Jones, P.J., de Lima, R.F. (2022). The Avifauna of the Gulf of Guinea Oceanic Islands. In: Ceríaco, L.M.P., de Lima, R.F., Melo, M., Bell, R.C. (eds) Biodiversity of the Gulf of Guinea Oceanic Islands. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06153-0_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06153-0_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06152-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06153-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)