Abstract
“Sorry! what did you say?” Consider how easy it is to miss some conversation details when it is noisy.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
12.1 Introduction
“Sorry! What did you say?” Consider how easy it is to miss some conversation details when it is noisy. Communication is an important aspect of all social interactions for animals, many use sound as a means of communication particularly longer distance communication.
“Is it day or night?” Light deprivation can have dramatic effects, so can too much.
“Too hot, too cold?” We all have our preferences but there are critical points of temperature ranges and rates of change that are detrimental to us and to all organisms on Earth.
This chapter introduces you to some forms of marine pollution that you might not immediately consider pollution. The point that helps to provide clarity about these pollutants is if they cause adverse effects. Indeed, they do. Commonly, the less easily recognised marine pollutants are not chemically based, but rather mechanical, physical or biological.
12.2 Noise Pollution
Sound is constituted by mechanical disturbance (or vibration) that moves through a material (Bradley and Stern 2008; Penar et al. 2020) and is a fundamental constituent of the marine environment. Sound propagates energy through the ocean and, like with sound movement through air, it moves in waves. The knowledge of the feature of sound is essential to fully understand the impacts of sound on marine organisms; and parameters such as frequency, wavelength and intensity best describe the characteristics of sound (Peng et al. 2015) (Box 12.1). Water being denser than air is a great medium of sound conduction as sound propagates faster in the sea than in the air. Being a liquid, water is less compressible than air and therefore transmits the sound wave faster when compared to air.
Sound is a part of the natural seascape. Oceans are naturally noisy with natural sounds originating from a great variety of sources.
The ocean is intimately coupled to the geosphere and the atmosphere and as such, most of the significant physical sources of natural sound occur at the interfaces of these media (NRC 2003). For instance, as described by the National Research Council (NRC 2003), many sounds originate in the atmosphere and enter the ocean surface; and elastic vibrations in the earth introduce sound into the underwater acoustic field.
Sound is regarded as an important feature of marine habitats, with most marine species relying on it for critical life functions (Hawkins and Popper 2017; Southall et al. 2020). Many marine organisms use sounds as a means of communication, thus overcoming the many complications that living in the sea implies. Communication is a vital aspect of all social interactions (Butler and Maruska 2020), and sound is an important part of communication. In fact, animals rely on sound signals that encode information about the sender’s species, sex, motivation, reproductive state and identity (Butler and Maruska 2020).
In contrast to sound, noise is more specific and defined as any unwanted or disturbing sound (Kunc et al. 2016) and there are varieties of sources of underwater noise. Underwater ambient (sound) noise is a component of background noise, and it varies depending on depth, time and location. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) ocean noise refers to sounds made by human activities, which can interfere with or obscure the ability of marine animals to hear natural sounds in the ocean. Excess noise affects both the anatomy and morphology of an organism, by mechanically damaging single cells as well as entire organs (Kunc et al. 2016). Sources of underwater noise can pose local impacts or regional and global impacts.
12.2.1 Natural Sources of Sound in the Sea
The underwater marine environment consists of biotic and abiotic sounds that are closely related to the survival and reproduction of marine organisms (Slabbekoorn et al. 2010). These natural sounds are both localized and dispersed and include surface waves, turbulence(wind), rainfall, water flow, seismic disturbances, cracking polar ice, and subsea earthquakes and volcanoes and sounds of biological origin (Bradley and Stern 2008; Peng et al. 2015; Hawkins and Popper 2017; Erbe et al. 2018). Natural biological sounds include whale songs, dolphin clicks and fish vocalizations among many others (NRC 2003). Background or ambient sound describes naturally occurring sounds from distributed sources. The combination of sounds produced by an ecosystem shows eco-acoustic complexity, and it is suggested that the more complex the natural soundscape, the healthier an ecosystem is (e.g. Linke et al. 2018; Di lorio et al. 2021).
Fish, marine mammals, invertebrates and other marine organisms produce natural biotic sound in the marine environment, and these are regarded as biotic or biological sources of sound (e.g. Figure 12.1). Biotic sounds can be produced in many different ways such as rubbing parts of the body such as bones, teeth or the valve of shells, mechanical flapping of teeth or plates; and compression and decompression of the bladder through muscle strength. Biotic sound in the sea is used to communicate, navigate, locate and avoid prey, mate detection, and orientation including locating appropriate habitats and locations (e.g. Lillis et al. 2014; Simpson et al. 2016; Hawkins and Popper 2017; Lecchini et al. 2018). Erbe et al. (2017) reported that marine mammals have evolved to use sound as their primary sensory modality-both actively (sound production) and passively (sound reception). A passive mode of sound is when an animal does not actively generate sound impulses but only responds to them with a particular behaviour and these include identification of predators, capture of prey and direction change. Through active sound animals can communicate during mating, search for food, navigate over long distances, fight for territory and social disputes, distract a predator to escape, stun and catch prey, and produce alarm signals. Echolocation is the ability to gain information from sounds produced by the animal that bounce off distant objects and return as echoes and is necessary for navigation. Examples of mammals that use echolocation include Odontocetes, sperm whales, finback whales and other dolphins Box 12.2.
Natural biotic sources of sound usually occur over an extremely broad frequency range; spatially very limited in extent and occur over a short time (Bradley and Stern 2008) and provide important information to marine organisms about their surrounding environments. Organisms vary in their complete sensitivity and spectral range of hearing (Peng et al. 2015) (Table 12.1). Abiotic sounds usually occur over a broad frequency range but they generally have a wide distribution and are generated over a long time (hours/days) (Bradley and Stern 2008).
12.2.2 Anthropogenic Sources of Sounds in the Sea
Noise generated intentionally and unintentionally from human activities is usually regarded as anthropogenic noise and more specifically in the marine environment as ocean or marine noise. Marine noise pollution is thus defined as any source of anthropogenic sound happening in the marine environment, which is capable of producing harmful effects on marine life.
Anthropogenic noise is a pervasive pollutant to almost all aquatic and terrestrial environments (Halfwerk and Slabbekoorn 2015). Many human activities generate noise within the hearing ranges of other animals, at sound levels above those found naturally and with different acoustic characteristics from natural sounds (Hildebrand 2009). The marine noise generated by human activities has amplified significantly since the industrial revolution (Frisk 2012); and hence the ocean is now reported to be 2–10 times louder compared to the preindustrial era (Hildebrand 2009; Frisk 2012). Escalating human population, coastal urbanisation, maritime traffic, oil extraction, civil and military sonars and ocean-based energy production systems (wind and wave energy farms) will continue to contribute to marine noise (di Franco et al. 2020).
Anthropogenic noises are multifaceted (Bradley and Stern 2008) and includes commercial shipping, oil and gas exploration, naval operations (e.g. military sonars, communications, and explosions), fishing (e.g. commercial/civilian sonars, acoustic deterrent, and harassment devices), dredging and drilling operations, marine renewable energy devices, research (e.g. air guns, sonars, telemetry, communication, and navigation) anti-predator devices, seismic surveys, cabling and other activities such as construction, icebreaking, and recreational boating (Hildebrand 2009; Jerem and Mathews 2020; Pieretti et al. 2020).
Underwater noise from shipping is a significant and pervasive pollutant with the potential to affect the marine ecosystems on a global scale (Clark et al. 2009; Williams et al. 2014; Merchant et al. 2015). In fact, ship noise is rising concomitantly with the increased use of shipping in transport and ships are becoming the most ubiquitous and pervasive source of anthropogenic noise in the oceans (Erbe et al. 2019; Vakili et al. 2020).
Anthropogenic noise can be categorised as either high-intensity impulsive noise or low-frequency stationary noise (Peng et al. 2015). High-intensity or acute marine noise pollution has a short duration and is often emitted repeatedly, over frequencies ranging from a few hertz (Hz) to hundreds of thousands of Hz. Low-intensity noise or chronic marine noise pollution has a longer duration with frequencies below 1 kHz (1000 Hz). Pile driving, underwater blasting, seismic exploration and active sonar application create high-intensity noise whilst ships and vessels generate low-frequency stationary noise (Codarin et al. 2009; Peng et al. 2015).
Chronic marine noise pollution is regarded as the main contributor to the increase in ocean background noise (Hildebrand 2009). Both acute and chronic marine noise pollution can co-occur and interact in producing their impact on marine life (di Franco et al. 2020).
12.2.3 Effects of Anthropogenic Noises
Increased anthropogenic noise imposes new constraints on communication (Vieira et al. 2021) such that it can interfere with the vocalizations emitted by many animals as well as the natural sounds that are used by animals for their routine behaviour. Biological sounds can be impaired by anthropogenic noise and possibly determine cascade effects at the population and community level (Kunc et al. 2016). In fact, noise exposure can change hearing capabilities.
The effects of anthropogenic underwater noise on aquatic life have become an important environmental issue (Thomsen et al. 2020) and a global concern which can cause auditory masking, behavioural disturbances, hearing damage and even death for marine animals (Peng et al. 2015; Halliday et al. 2020). Faulkner et al. (2018) further emphasised that underwater noise pollution poses a global threat to marine life and has become a growing concern for policy makers and environmental managers.
12.3 Light Pollution
Natural light at night is derived from the moon, the stars and the Milky Way (Ayalon et al. 2019; Duarte et al. 2019) whilst the day light is from the sun. The natural sources of light play a fundamental role on the behavioural patterns of marine as well as terrestrial organisms and the timing of the ecological processes (Ayalon et al. 2019; Duarte et al. 2019). The vast majority of species have evolved under natural and predictable regimes of moonlight, sunlight and starlight (Davies et al. 2014). Smyth et al. (2020) highlighted that photobiological life history adaptations to the moon and sun are near ubiquitous in the surface ocean (0–200 m), such that cycles and gradients of light intensity and spectra are major structuring factors in marine ecosystems.
With human population growth, the progress of energy supply for lighting and lighting technologies, artificial light has steadily altered natural cycles in many locations. Human population growth and migration to the coastal regions have led to an increase in the amount of lighting near coastal environments. Of emerging concern is the artificial light, which is now central to the functioning of modern society and concomitantly referred to as the artificial light at night (ALAN). ALAN is the alteration of natural light levels due to anthropogenic light sources (Cinzano et al. 2001; Falchi et al. 2016; Duarte et al. 2019) and is closely related to the rate of urban development, especially with the presence of outdoor night lights (Maggi and Serôdio 2020) (Figure 12.2). Artificial light is an emerging threat to global biodiversity (Reid et al. 2019) and is escalating swiftly in coastal habitats due to rapid urbanisation, fisheries and aquaculture.
ALAN affects the adjacent abiotic environment both directly (through light sources of variable intensity) and indirectly (through the formation of a skyglow) (O’Connor et al. 2019; Maggi and Serôdio 2020). The skyglow is a diffuse light field of low intensity, and continuous lighting that is detectable as a glowing dome over built up areas such as coastal settlements and marine infrastructure, spreading its influence on sub-urban and rural sites (Gaston 2018; O’Connor et al. 2019) (Figure 12.2b). Sources of ALAN include fixed lamps along the coastal streets, promenades, ports and marinas, lighthouses, oil platforms and from mobile sources such as commercial and tourist boats (O’Connor et al., 2019; Maggi and Serôdio 2020). The emission spectrum of the light sources creates vertical variability in the water column due to precise attenuation patterns amongst different wavelengths (Tamir et al. 2017).
Depledge et al. (2010) reported that light pollution occurs when organisms are exposed to light in the wrong place, at the wrong time or at the wrong intensity. Light pollution or ecological light pollution (ELP) describes all types of artificial light that alter the natural patterns of light and dark in ecosystems (Longcore and Rich 2004). Light pollution mainly affects nocturnal species by triggering unnatural processes that can result in important physiological and behavioral changes (Navara and Nelson 2007).
Artificial light disturbs a variety of fundamental biological processes such as the development of visual cells, pigmentation, growth, and development in the early life stages of fish (Boeuf and Le Bail 1999; O’Connor et al. 2019; Zapata et al. 2019); the structure and functions of invertebrate and fish communities in ecosystems (Davies et al. 2012; Zapata et al. 2019); harming biodiversity hotspots (Guette et al. 2018) spawning and settlement patterns of different species of corals and thus affecting the local and spatial community structure.
ALAN impacts species behaviour and inter-species interactions through the fluctuating visual surroundings (O’Connor et al. 2019). ALAN has prevalent effects on marine turtles (Tuxbury and Salmon 2005; Lorne and Salmon 2007; Dimitriadis et al. 2018), fish (Brüning et al. 2015; Pulgar et al. 2019), invertebrate communities (Jelassi et al. 2014; Underwood et al. 2017) and corals (Vermeij and Bak 2002; Gleason et al. 2006; Schlacher et al. 2007; Strader et al. 2015). Of concern is the light pollution on coral reefs since coral reef fishes depend on natural lunar cues to regulate reproductive periodicity in adults and the timing of reef-colonization by the larvae at the end of their pelagic dispersal phase (Naylor 1999; Davies et al. 2013; Besson et al. 2017).
Several studies have highlighted the effect of ALAN on coastal organisms and habitats such as effects on settlement processes both in invertebrates and bacteria (Davies et al. 2015; Maggi and Benedetti-Cecchi 2018); changes in behaviour such as orientation and nesting of turtles, vertical migration of zooplankton and fish, antipredator and locomotor activities, trophic pressure (Witherington and Bjorndal 1991; Underwood et al. 2017; Ludvigsen et al. 2018; Duarte et al. 2019; Maggi et al. 2019) and the composition of assemblages (Garratt et al. 2019; Maggi et al. 2020). Furthermore, ALAN also has an effect on predator–prey interactions (Cravens et al. 2018; O’Connor et al. 2019; Yurk and Trites 2000); species phenology (Gaston et al. 2017; Bennie et al. 2018); foraging behaviour (Underwood et al. 2017; Farnworth et al. 2018); and orientation (Lorne and Salmon 2007). O’Connor et al. (2019) observed that light pollution causes changes in behaviour, physiological function and post-settlement survival in surgeonfish (Acanthurus triostegus) larvae (Table 12.2). The distance from a source that results in an insignificant effect of ALAN will vary between species.
Symbiotic corals are highly photosensitive and are likely to be susceptible to ecological light problems since they are often found in shallow, clear water with relatively high light levels (Rosenberg et al. 2019). Rosenberg et al. (2019) reported that human instigated ELP could alter the natural light regimes of coral reefs by causing persistence disturbance or chronic stress. Oxidative stress and physiological effects from exposure to ALAN had been observed for scleractinian corals, Acropora eurystoma and Pocillopora damicornis, from the Gulf of Eilat in the Red Sea, from exposure to blue LED and white LED lights (Ayalon et al. 2019).
Seabirds of the order Procellariiformes (such as shearwaters, petrels and albatrosses) are nocturnal (active at night) so as to avoid predation; exploit bioluminescent and vertically migrating prey and navigate the night sky. However, these seabirds are vulnerable to artificial light and easily get disoriented by intense sources of artificial light. The vulnerability to artificial lighting varies between different species and age classes of birds and is influenced by season, lunar phase and weather conditions (Birdlife International 2012).
Sea turtles require regular intervals of natural diurnal and nocturnal light when they come ashore to lay their eggs (Silva et al. 2017). Light pollution tends to decrease the availability and suitability of sea turtle habitats and can become a crucial threat to entire sea turtle populations (Hopkins and Richardson 1984); especially nesting of adult marine turtles (Silva et al. 2017).
12.4 Thermal Pollution
Thermal pollution is the degradation of water quality due to changes in the ambient temperature of seawater, thus causing deleterious ecological effects. The influence of thermal discharges on aquatic ecosystems has become a significant issue in the field of marine and environmental protection. Thermal pollution can be caused by either hot or cold water discharges, and both the rate and extent of temperature change that deviates from normal conditions are important factors affecting marine organisms. Discharges from industrial activities are important sources of thermal pollution and in longer term, more subtle timeframes ocean warning from atmospheric change is considered a risk (e.g. Baag and Mandal 2022) and has been implicated in global coral reef bleaching events (Ainsworth et al. 2021). Community and ecosystem responses to thermal pollution include reduced species abundance, species richness and species diversity (e.g. benthic foraminiferal assemblages in Israel, Arieli et al. 2011) and may result in localised biological extinction (Dong et al. 2018).
A common cause of thermal pollution is the discharge of water, used as a coolant in industries, data storage centres and power plants (Abbaspour et al. 2005; Issakhov and Zhandaulet 2019; Mokhtari and Arabkoohsar 2021). Coolant waters may also contain contaminants such as metals through corrosion of infrastructure. When the coolant water is returned to the marine environment (usually at a higher temperature) it results in decreased availability of dissolved oxygen. Dissolved oxygen is essential for underwater life and if lacking may lead to deleterious effects such as fish kills (Speight 2020). An upsurge in seawater temperature also leads to seawater stratification (Huang et al. 2019). Seawater stratification occurs when isolated layers of water are formed with the upper warm layer (epilimnion) being separated by the cold layer (hypolimnion). Littlefair et al. (2020) stated that the hydrological layers give rise to distinct temperature and oxygen circumstances, thus creating different habitat niches for aquatic organisms which are adapted to particular temperature ranges (Speight 2020).
Many marine organisms have specific temperature needs, and hence rapid temperature changes can be deleterious (e.g. thermal shocks can result in reproduction difficulties and less resistance to diseases). Slower rates of temperature change can impact species if they exceed the upper (or lower) thermal tolerance level of species. Upper and lower thermal tolerances are not known for all species and research in this field highlights the complexity of the combination of responses to stressors including metabolic regulation, oxygen limitation and heat tolerance (e.g. Marshall and McQuaid 2020). Interestingly, the same species from different geographic locations can have different upper and lower thermal tolerances, highlighting population adaptability (Black et al. 2015). Furthermore, temperature change can result in increased sensitivity to other pollutants (Black et al. 2015) (see also Chapter 14). Notable consequences of artificial temperature rise include forced migration, massive fish kills as a result of slowing of metabolism, increased sensitivity to toxins, and loss of biodiversity.
Warming air temperatures over the past several decades have resulted in mass coral bleaching events in many parts of the world. The bleaching patterns vary spatially and temporally and are most common in tropical mid-latitudes (15°–20° north and south of the Equator) (Sully et al. 2019). Sully et al. (2019) further suggest that rates of change in sea surface temperatures are strong predictors of coral bleaching with faster rates of change correlating with higher levels of bleaching.
12.5 Particulates
Marine water quality is crucial for plants and animals that live in the sea; especially for marine species that rely on photosynthesis. Water clarity is an important water quality parameter and is a measure of how far light can penetrate through the water column. Light penetration is vital for the process of photosynthesis and contributes to the conditions that provide for the enormous diversity present in the ocean waters (Figure 12.3). Kennicutt (2017) reported that access to sunlight is vital for the well-being of submerged aquatic vegetation, which aids as food and habitat for other biota. Water clarity is important as clear waters enable more sunlight to reach the photic zone, enabling the production of oxygen. Clear waters usually have low concentrations of suspended particles, and both natural and anthropogenic sources of suspended and dissolved solids affect water clarity (Kennicutt 2017). Dissolved substances as well as the productivity of phytoplankton also affect water clarity and colour. Floating plastic particulates are also of concern and have been discussed specifically in Chapter 9.
12.5.1 Particulate Organic Matter
Marine phytoplankton; mostly single-celled algae and bacteria are extraordinarily diverse in morphology, evolutionary history, and biochemical behavior. They make up most of the organic particulate matter in seawater via the process of photosynthesis (Pilson 2013) and while essential to ecosystem structure they too can become a problem due to increased nutrient availability (Chapter 4). The formation of organic matter from phytoplankton is referred to as primary production; where carbon dioxide, water and other nutrients in the presence of sunlight are converted to organic matter. Organic matter can also enter the marine environment from river discharges, from the atmosphere, from photosynthesis by larger fixed algae along the shores, and by bacterial chemosynthesis on parts of the ocean floor (Pilson 2013). Organic matter composed of algae, plants and other animals is regarded as autocthonous organic matter whilst those composed of terrestrial material are allochthonous. In the aquatic environment, organic matter can be present as particulate organic matter and dissolved organic matter.
The organic matter present in aquatic ecosystems is typically composed of proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, humic substances (e.g. humic and fulvic acids), plant tissues (rich in cellulose and hemicellulose) and animals and other acids of different molecular weights (Benner 2003). Organic matter can undergo transformations in the water column of aquatic environments and later become part of the sediments. In aquatic ecosystems, sediments may receive large amounts of organic matter and as it settles through the water it provides essential energy for the deep sea. Most deep sea ecosystems are heterotrophic, waiting for food to sink from the euphotic zone (<200 m) and the surface production can vary both temporally and spatially resulting in variable deposition of organic matter to the sea floor (Ramirez-Llodra et al. 2010 and authors there in).
12.5.2 Suspended Sediments
Sediments are principally unconsolidated materials, products of modification of rocks, soils, and organic matter that have undergone weathering, transportation, transformation and deposition near the Earth’s surface or in water bodies (Cardoso et al. 2019). Sediments at the bottom of the oceans have formed from particulate matter that settles out of the water column and may consist of coarse gravel, sand, clay and organic ooze, together with contaminants. Sediments in the oceans are repositories for physical and biological debris, and serve as sinks for a wide variety of chemicals. In aquatic ecosystems, sediments provide habitat and substrate for a wide variety of benthic organisms and chemicals that bind to sediment particles can cause grave pollution problems (Chapters 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6).
Regardless of any chemicals associated with suspended sediments the particles themselves can result in deleterious impacts on organisms and communities. As a physical pollutant, suspended sediments cause:
-
reduce water clarity and limit the depth sunlight can penetrate for photosynthesis to occur;
-
excess fine sediments can injure gills of some types of fish and shell fish;
-
reduced visibility from reduced water clarity causes a reduction in the number of organisms that use visual methods to seek prey and hide from predators; and
-
when they eventually settle sediments may smother sessile species resulting in death (Figure 12.4).
Enhanced turbidity can be generated naturally from storms and terrestrial runoff, however, vegetation clearing in catchments and poorly managed riparian zones enhance soil loss to waterways which is subsequently transported to the ocean (Figure 12.4d). Port and harbour facilities for shipping require relatively deep water and entrances often need to be dredged to establish and maintain access. Dredging re-mobilises deposited sediment which can then be transported by tidal currents, settling in areas of low velocity. Figure 12.5 shows capital dredging works in 1991, in Cleveland Bay, Townsville, Australia. Sediments drifted from the dredging and dump sites and settled on coral surfaces around Magnetic Island offshore from Townsville (Reichelt and Jones 1994).
Throughout the world there are numerous examples of submarine tailings disposal (STD) also known as deep sea tailings placement (DSTP) (Vare et al. 2018). During STD operations tens to hundreds of thousands of tailings waste from terrestrial mining activities are discharged on a daily basis to the ocean at a depth between 80 and 150 m. The site of pipeline discharge is generally placed at the edge of a continental shelf, and tailings are meant to fall down the continental slope to rest in canyons (Chapter 5, Figure 5.3). The process results in the smothering of marine species in the impact zone and contributes to turbidity in the water column due to plume sheering (Reichelt-Brushett 2012; Stauber et al. 2022).
12.6 Pathogens
Pathogens are organisms that cause disease to their host, with the severity of the disease symptoms referred to as virulence (Balloux and van Dorp 2017). They are widely diverse taxonomically and consist of bacteria, viruses, fungi and some parasites as well as unicellular and multicellular eukaryotes, potentially harmful to humans, marine species and ecosystems. Host–pathogen relationships are capable of influencing population dynamics, community structure, and biogeochemical cycles, and these are expected to shift in response to global climate change (Cohen et al. 2018).
Pathogens can be found in association with marine animals, phytoplankton, zooplankton, sediments and detritus (Stewart et al. 2008). Environmental factors such as salinity, temperature, nutrients and light influence the survival and sometimes the proliferation of pathogens (Stewart et al. 2008). Diseases have been identified as a major contributor to the decline of corals worldwide, particularly in the Western Atlantic (Bourne et al. 2009). The causes of disease are either from new pathogens or changed environmental conditions that affect the host, pathogen, environment relationship (Figure 12.6).
Pathogens cause illness to their hosts in a variety of ways such as direct damage of tissues or cells during replication, or through the production of toxins. Bacterial toxins are among the deadliest poisons known and include famous examples such as tetanus, anthrax or botulinum taoxin (Balloux and van Dorp 2017). The majority of the antibiotic classes are originally derived from bacteria and fungi (some of which are derived from the marine environment); with 64% of antibiotic classes being derived from filamentous actinomycetes (Gomes et al. 2021). Marine actinomycetes produce secondary metabolites that show a range of biological activities including antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer, insecticidal and enzyme inhibition. Marine pathogens and other parasites play important roles in composing the makeup, diversity, and health of natural marine communities (Baskin 2006). They may also be responsible for a broad spectrum of acute and chronic human diseases such as gastroenteritis, ocular and respiratory infections, hepatitis, myocarditis, meningitis, and neural paralysis (Brettar et al. 2007).
Pathogens are divided as facultative or obligate pathogens depending on how intimately their life cycle is tied to their host (Balloux and van Dorp 2017). Facultative pathogens are primarily environmental bacteria and fungi that can occasionally cause infection and include many of the hospital-acquired bacteria involved in the antimicrobial resistance pandemic (Balloux and van Dorp 2017). However, obligate pathogens necessitate a host to fulfil their life cycle. For instance, all viruses are obligate pathogens as they are dependent on the cellular machinery of their host for their reproduction (Balloux and van Dorp 2017).
12.6.1 Sources of Marine Pathogens
Pathogens artificially introduced to the marine environment get carried via sewage effluent, ship ballast water, agricultural runoff (defecation/urination/shedding from human or animal hosts), stormwater runoff, human recreational, industrial processes, introduction of exotic species and plastics (Baskin 2006). Non-host environments such as water, decaying organic matter and abiotic surfaces are important constituents of the lifespan of some pathogens since these environments provide habitats in which pathogens may replicate or survive; thus facilitating transmission (Lanzas et al. 2019).
Corals belong to the phylum Cnidaria, which consist of organisms including jellyfish, anemones, and hydra that form polyps with stinging cells and scleractinian corals which are the major reef building corals. Coral reefs are declining world-wide as a result of global changes; and one of the factors of concern include destructive diseases. Sharma and Ravindran (2020) mentioned that pathogens and parasites causing infectious diseases of scleractinian or stony corals especially in India include bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasitic infections by protozoans, metazoans and parazoans; which leads to partial or entire-colony mortality. These infectious diseases cause lesions or bands of tissue loss on the coral colonies, thus affecting the entire reef ecosystem (Sokolow 2009). Diseases lead to significant alterations in coral reproduction and growth rates, thus changing community structure, species diversity and abundance of reef-associated organisms (Loya et al. 2001). White band disease on Acropora palmate and Acropora cervicornis in the 1980s caused an estimated 95% reduction in colonies (Vollmer and Kline 2008). White pox disease in the Florida Keys reduced the cover of Acropora palmata by up to 70% (Patterson et al. 2002).
12.7 Personal Care Products (PCPs)
Personal care products (PCPs) are intended for external application on the human body and generally enter the environment unaltered during water recreation, washing, showering or bathing and are considered as emerging pollutants (Chapter 13). PCPs that usually reach the aquatic environment are bioactive, pseudo-persistent, exhibit a high degree of bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms (Cortez et al. 2012; Montesdeoca-Esponda et al. 2018) and have been shown to impact marine organisms (Câmara et al. 2021). The environmental fate of PCPs depends on their physicochemical properties such as water solubility, adsorption behaviour, volatility and degradability (Montesdeoca-Esponda et al. 2018). Consequently little is known about the fate and the toxicity of PCPs introduced into the environment, hence, increasing attention is being placed on their occurrence, persistence, and potential threats to aquatic environment and human health.
PCPs include a large and diverse group of organic compounds used in disinfectants, soaps, shampoos, lotions, skin creams, toothpaste, fragrances/synthetic musks, sunscreens, insect repellants, and preservatives. The primary classes of personal care products include disinfectants (e.g. triclosan), fragrances (e.g. musks), insect repellants (e.g. DEET), preservatives (e.g. parabens) and UV filters (e.g. methylbenzylidene camphor) (Brausch and Rand 2011). UV filters are used to protect skin from UV solar radiation and usually contains chemicals of different chemical families such as benzimidazoles, camphor derivatives, triazines, benzotriazoles, cinnamates, salicylates, benzophenones, p-aminobenzoates (Câmara et al. 2021).
Many of these compounds are environmentally persistent, bioactive, potentially bioaccumulative and have lipophilic characteristics (Peck 2006; Mackay and Barnthouse 2010; Brausch and Rand 2011). Table 12.3 identifies some subgroups of PCPs and the characteristic compounds present in them see also Box 12.3.
12.7.1 Triclosan and Triclocarban
The PCPs Triclosan (TCS) and triclocarban (TCC) two distinctive antimicrobial agents used in soaps, deodorants, skin creams, toothpaste and plastics, among other things (see US EPA 2008); are frequently detected in seawater (McAvoy et al. 2002; Liu and Wong 2013); and are amongst the top 10 most commonly detected organic wastewater compounds for frequency and concentration (Kolpin et al. 2002; Halden and Paull 2015). The effectiveness of TCS against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria resulted in its widespread use (Cortez et al. 2012). TCS is regarded as an environmental concern due to its photodegradation into dioxins and furans; structural similarity to Bisphenol-A; biological methylation due to formation of more toxic compounds; and its bioaccumulative and toxic nature (see Cortez et al. 2012) (Table 12.4). The TCS molecule possesses both the phenol (5-chloro-2(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) phenol) and ether (2,4,4-trichloro-2-hydroxydiphenylether) functional groups (Olaniyan et al. 2016). TCS consists of multiple halogen atoms and is highly xenobiotic; and hence many microorganisms lack the necessary metabolic pathways and enzymes to degrade it (Abbot et al. 2020) and therefore it is highly persistent and bioaccumulates in the environment (Halden 2014). Cortez et al. (2012) demonstrated via laboratory assays that TCS caused acute and chronic toxicity to gametes and embryos of Perna perna at concentrations not yet reported in marine surface waters. TCC (3-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)) is used as a broad spectrum antibacterial and antifungal agent in many personal care products. It is a trichlorinated binuclear aromatic compound which has toxic, persistent and bioaccumulating properties (Halden 2014). TCC concentrations have been measured at 6.75 µg/L in raw wastewater (Halden and Paull 2015).
12.7.2 Sunscreens
Sunscreens are of emerging concern both to human and environmental health; however, their regulation is constantly evolving, largely due to the potential risks related to the ingredients they contain (Labille et al. 2020). Sunscreens typically consist of an oil–water emulsion in which the major active ingredients are UV filters, incorporated in high concentrations (Labille et al. 2020). Sunscreen products contain active constituents that protect human skin from UV radiation. Ramos et al. (2015) reported that UV filters and stabilizers are assimilated into a wide range of manufactured products to provide protection from UVA (315–400 nm) and UVB (280–315 nm) radiation. These include organic compounds that absorb UV rays (e.g. cinnamates, camphor derivatives, benzophenones) and/or inorganic compounds (e.g. TCC (3-(4-ch, TiO2 and ZnO), which act as chemical or physical filters preventing or limiting UV penetration (Corinaldesi et al. 2017; Carve et al. 2021).
As the number of vacationers visiting the world’s oceans increases, the rate of sunscreen inadvertently washed into these marine environments also rises. UV filters enter the environment directly from sloughing off while swimming and other recreational activities or indirectly via effluent from waste water treatment plants (Brausch and Rand 2011). Whilst these compounds have relatively short half-lives in seawater; they are continuously reintroduced via recreational activities and wastewater discharge, making them environmentally persistent (Horricks et al. 2019). UV filters are considered to be ubiquitous environmental contaminants of increasing concern, due to their bioaccumulation potential, and as endocrine disruptors (Ozáez et al. 2013).
Miller et al. (2021) mentioned that UV filters used in sunscreens and other PCPs may impact coral health on a local scale and also affect other marine species (Box 12.3). Research studies have suggested that exposure of corals to several widely used UV filters have produced negative health effects including bleaching and mortality (see Miller et al. 2021). Research findings of Danovaro et al. (2008) and Downs et al. (2014, 2016) raised public concern and Hawaii became the first place to take legislative action to ban Benzophenone-3 (BP-3) and octinoxate (EHMC).
12.8 Non-native Species
Non-native species (NNS) (synonyms: exotic, alien taxa, non-indigenous, allochthonous, introduced) are species, sub-species or lower taxa introduced outside of their natural range and outside of their natural dispersal potential, dispersed by direct or indirect, intentional or unintentional human activities (Walther et al. 2009; Occhipinti-Ambrogi and Galil 2010; Rotter et al. 2020). NNS can be introduced and spread to waters through several different pathways (e.g. Alidoost Salimi et al. 2021). The major threat to indigenous species diversity and community structures occurs as a result of human-mediated introduction of a marine species outside their natural range of distribution (Rotter et al. 2020). NNS are a component of global change in all marine coastal ecosystems (Occhipinti-Ambrogi 2007) since they are a major threat to global biodiversity. Scientists and policy makers increasingly see the introduction of alien species as a major threat to marine biodiversity and a contributor to environmental change (Bax et al. 2003).
Harbours are known introduction foci of NNS, acting as recipients of new introductions and as sources for regional spread (Peters et al. 2017). Aquaculture is another primary pathway of the introduction of NNS (e.g., Wang et al. 2021), Additional to these, NNS can hitch-hike clinging to scuba gear between uses, attached to marine litter or debris, or in consignments of live organisms traded as live bait and plants and animals destined for the aquarium trade (Ruiz et al. 1997; Bax et al. 2003; Godwin 2003; Padilla and Williams 2004; Cagauan 2007; Molnar et al. 2008; De Silva et al. 2009; Anderson et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2021). Interestingly, NNS have been used in restoration programs and for biological control, sometimes with devastating consequences.
Some NNS can have slight impacts within their new habitat; whilst others can become invasive and pose serious threats affecting marine biodiversity, coastal economies, local cultures and livelihoods and human health. If NNS succeed in attaining high abundances, then they have the potential to displace native species, disturb ecosystem processes and function, change community structure, impact human health, decrease native biodiversity and cause substantial economic losses (Mack et al. 2000; Grosholz 2002; Bax et al. 2003; Simberloff 2005; Ojaveer et al. 2015). Furthermore, NNS may bring with them new diseases and parasites, and genetic modifications (e.g. aquaculture species) (Cook et al. 2016).
Davidson et al. (2015) reported that marine macroalgae are a major constituent of NNS worldwide, having current estimations of introductions in excess of 300 species. The NNS usually have fast growth rates, morphological plasticity, production of tetraspores in abundance and grow on other algae (Russell 1992; Smith et al. 2002). Red alga Kappaphycus alvarezii was widely farmed in the Philippines in the 1960s (Bixler 1996; Sulu et al. 2004); in Hawaii from 1970 (Conklin and Smith 2005); and in the Gulf of Mannar from 1990 (Kamalakannan et al. 2014); and established populations have spread outside the farmed areas in India, Tanzania, Panama, Venezuela, Hawaii and Fiji (Rodgers and Cox 1999; Ask et al. 2003; Chandrasekaran et al. 2008; Sellers et al. 2015). Kappaphycus alvarezii is cultured in close proximity to coral reef ecosystems such as Kãneʻohe Bay, Hawaiʻi and the Gulf of Mannar, India (Rodgers and Cox 1999; Chandrasekaran et al. 2008) and tends to reduce the density and diversity of native fish and decreases the species richness and abundance of native macroalgae, coral and other benthic macrofauna (Neilson et al. 2018; HISC 2019).
Other examples of red algae including Gracilaria Salicornia, Acanthophora spicifera and Hypnea musciformis have been known to cause problems in Hawaii (Alidoost Salimi et al. 2021). Gracilaria Salicornia leads to the acidification of water, causing coral reef deterioration (Martinez et al. 2012) whilst A. spicifera and H. musciformis were observed to smother corals and algae (Smith et al. 2002). Further examples of other NNS that have had significant environmental impacts are highlighted in Table 12.5.
There are wide ranging action programs to deal with invasive marine species and websites dedicated to educating people about these and their impacts on biodiversity. Some examples include:
-
Lionfish: http://lionfish.gcfi.org/index.php (Figure 12.7)
-
Northern Pacific Seastar: https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/conservation/the-marine-environment/marine-pests-and-diseases/pest-identification/northern-pacific-seastar
-
Black Striped Mussel: https://nt.gov.au/marine/for-all-harbour-and-boat-users/biosecurity/aquatic-pests-marine-and-freshwater/black-striped-mussel
-
Red Mangroves: https://malamaopuna.org/our-work/past-work/mangrove-removal-waiopae/.
It is helpful to tackle an invasive species problem when it is relatively small and when the reproductive effort of the introduced population is not at its maximum. There are basic frameworks to develop invasive marine species management plans that can help direct effort to ensure cost-effective returns. Some programs are government-funded, but others are driven by community organisations and partnerships.
12.9 Summary
This chapter has introduced you to some of the many other marine pollution problems that are being tackled in many different ways. It is a diverse chapter highlighting sources and impacts from noise, light, temperature, particulates, pathogens, personal care products, and non-native species. To understand each of these topics requires focused research activity, and this research highlights the need to develop solutions. Mitigating marine pollution is an essential research area now and in the future. Chapter 15 provides a helpful introduction to marine pollution mitigation and habitat restoration.
12.10 Study Questions and Activities
-
1.
Investigate the upper and lower thermal tolerances of some marine species. Record your findings.
-
2.
Find out about the biology of a non-native species (NNS) that has been introduced in your home country. What are the ecological and economic consequences of this introduction?
-
3.
How can suspended sediment impact marine species? Provide an example of a species that may be impacted in each of the ways described in the dot points of Section 12.5.2.
-
4.
This chapter is unlikely to have covered all the ‘other’ pollutants in the marine environment that have not had chapters dedicated to them in this textbook. Form a group and discuss pollutants that have not been covered in this textbook. Send your recommendation to the Editor as there might just be a second edition of the book.
Abbreviations
- ALAN:
-
Artificial light at night
- ELP:
-
ecological light pollution
- NNS:
-
Non-native species
- NRC:
-
National Research Council
- NOAA:
-
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- PCPs:
-
personal care products
- STD:
-
submarine tailings disposal also known as deep sea tailings placement (DSTP)
- TCC:
-
triclocarban
- TCS:
-
triclosan
References
Abbaspour M, Javid AH, Moghimi P, Kayhan K (2005) Modeling of thermal pollution in coastal area and its economical and environmental assessment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2(1):13–26
Abbott T, Kor-Bicakci G, Islam MS, Eskicioglu C (2020) A review on the fate of legacy and alternative antimicrobials and their metabolites during wastewater and sludge treatment. Int J Mol Sci 21:9241
Ainsworth TD, Leggat W, Silliman BR, Lantz CA, Bergman JL, Fordyce AJ, Page CE, Renzi JJ, Morton J, Eakin CM, Heron SF (2021) Rebuilding relationships on coral reefs: coral bleaching knowledge-sharing to aid adaptation planning for reef users. BioEssays 43(9):2100048
Alidoost Salimi P, Creed JC, Esch MM, Fenner D, Jaafar Z, Levesque JC, Montgomery AD, Alidoost Salimi M, Patterson Edward JK, Diraviya Raj K, Sweet M (2021) A review of the diversity and impact of invasive non-native species in tropical marine ecosystems. Mar Biodivers Rec 14:11
Allen J (1998) Mangroves as alien species: the case of Hawai‘i. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 7(1):61–71
Anderson LG, Roclitte S, Haddaway NR, Dunn AM (2015) The role of tourism and recreation in the spread of non-native species: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10:0140833
Araujo MJ, Rocha RJM, Soares AMVM, Benede JL, Chisvert A, Monteiro MS (2018) Effects of UV filter 4-methylbenzylidene camphor during early development of Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858. Sci Total Environ 628:1395–1404
Arieli RN, Almogi-Labin A, Abramovich S, Herut B (2011) The effect of thermal pollution on benthic foraminiferal assemblages in the Mediterranean shoreface adjacent to Hadera power plant (Israel). Mar Pollut Bull 62:1002–1012
Ask EI, Batibasaga A, Zertuche-Gonzalez JA, De San M (2003) Three decades of Kappaphycus alvarezii (Rhodophyta) introduction to non-endemic locations. In: Proceedings of the 17th international seaweed symposium, Cape Town, South Africa, vol 17, pp 49–57
Ávila E, Carballo JL (2009) A preliminary assessment of the invasiveness of the Indo- Pacific sponge Chalinula nematifera on coral communities from the tropical Eastern Pacific. Biol Invasions 11(2):257–264
Ayalon I, Marangoni LFD, Benichou JIC, Avisar D, Levy O (2019) Red Sea corals under artificial light pollution at night (ALAN) undergo oxidative stress and photosynthetic impairment. Glob Change Biol 25:4194–4207
Baag S, Mandal S (2022) Combined effects of ocean warming and acidification on marine fish and shellfish: a molecule to ecosystem perspective. Sci Total Environ 802:149807
Ballew NG, Bacheler NM, Kellison GT, Schueller AM (2016) Invasive lionfish reduce native fish abundance on a regional scale. Sci Rep 6:321169
Balloux F, van Dorp L (2017) Q&A: what are pathogens, and what have they done to and for us? BMC Biol 15:91
Baskin Y (2006) Sea sickness: the upsurge in marine diseases. Bioscience 56(6):464–469
Bax N, Williamson A, Aguero M, Gonzalez E, Geeves W (2003) Marine invasive alien species: a threat to global biodiversity. Mar Policy 27(4):313–323
Benner R (2003) Molecular indicators of the bioavailability of dissolved organic matter. In: Findlay S, Sinsabaugh R (eds) Aquatic ecosystems interactivity of dissolved organic matter. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 121–135
Bennie J, Davies TW, Cruse D, Bell F, Gaston KJ (2018) Artificial light at night alters grassland vegetation species composition and phenology. J Appl Ecol 55:442–450
Besson M, Gache C, Brooker RM, Moussa RM, Waqalevu VP, LeRohellec M, Jaouen V, Peyrusse K, Berthe C, Bertucci F (2017) Consistency in the supply of larval fishes among coral reefs in French Polynesia. PLoS ONE 12:e0178795
Black J, Reichelt-Brushett AJ, Clark M (2015) The effect of copper and temperature on juveniles of the eurybathic brittle star Amphipholis squamata. Chemosphere 124:32–39
Birdlife International (2012) Light pollution has a negative impact on many seabirds including several globally threatened species. Available at: www.birdligr.org. Accessed 29 Oct 2021
Bixler HJ (1996) Recent developments in manufacturing and marketing carrageenan. Hydrobiologia 326:35–57
Boeuf G, Le Bail PY (1999) Does light have an influence on fish growth? Aquaculture 177(1):129–152
Bourne DG, Garren M, Work TM, Rosenberg E, Smith GW, Harvell CD (2009) Microbial disease and the coral holobiont. Trends Microbiol 17(12):554–562
Bradley DL, Stern R (2008) Underwater sound and the marine mammal acoustic environment: a guide to fundamental principles prepared for the U.S. Marine Mammal Commission. Available at: https://www.mmc.gov/wp-content/uploads/sound_bklet.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2021
Brausch JM, Rand GM (2011) A review of personal care products in the aquatic environment: environmental concentrations and toxicity. Chemosphere 82:1518–1532
Brettar I, Guzman CA, Hofle MG (2007) Human pathogens in the marine environment—an ecological perspective. CIESM Workshop Monographs No. 31.: Marine Sciences and Public Health, CIESM, Geneva, pp 59–68
Brüning A, Hölker F, Franke S, Preuer T, Kloas W (2015) Spotlight on fish: light pollution affects circadian rhythms of European perch but does not cause stress. Sci Total Environ 511:516–522
Butler JM, Maruska KP (2020) Underwater noise impairs social communication during aggressive and reproductive encounters. Anim Behav 164:9–23
Cagauan AG (2007) Exotic aquatic species introduction in the Philippines for aquaculture—a threat to biodiversity or a boom to the economy. J Environ Sci Manage 10(1):48–62
Câmara JS, Montesdeoca-Esponda S, Freitas J, Guedes-Alonso R, Sosa-Ferrara Z, Perestrelo R (2021) Emerging contaminants in seafront zones. Environmental impact and analytical approaches. Separations 8(7):95
Cardoso SJ, Quadra GR, Resende NdS, Roland F (2019) The role of sediments in the carbon and pollutant cycles in aquatic ecosystems. Thematic Section: mini-reviews in applied limnology. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 31:e201
Carve M, Nugegoda D, Allinson G, Shimeta J (2021) A systematic review and ecological risk assessment for organic ultraviolet filters in aquatic environments. Environ Pollut 268(B):115894
Chandrasekaran S, Nagendran NA, Pandiaraja D, Krishnankutty N, Kamalakannan B (2008) Bioinvasion of Kappaphycus alvarezii on corals in the Gulf of Mannar, India. Curr Sci 94(9):1167–1172
Chimner RA, Fry B, Kaneshiro MY, Cormier N (2006) Current extent and historical expansion of introduced mangroves on O’ahu, Hawai’i. Pac Sci 60(3):377–383
Cinzano P, Falchi F, Elvidge CD (2001) The first world atlas of the artificial night sky brightness. Mon Not R Astron Soc 328(2):689–707
Clark CW, Ellison WT, Southall B, Hatch LT, Van Parijs S, Frankel AS, Ponirakis D (2009) Acoustic masking in marine ecosystems: intuitions, analysis and implications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 395:201–222
Codarin A, Wysicki LE, Ladich F, Picculin M (2009) Effects of ambient and boat noise on hearing and communication in three fish species living in a marine protected area (Miramare, Italy). Mar Pollut Bull 58:1880–1887
Cohen RE, James CC, Lee A, Martinelli MM, Muraoka WT, Ortega M, Sadowski R, Starkey L, Szesciorka AR, Timko SE, Weiss EL, Franks PJS (2018) Marine host-pathogen dynamics influences of global climate change. Oceanography 31(2 Special Issue):182–193
Coles SL, Bolick H (2007) Invasive introduced sponge Mycale grandis overgrows reef corals in Kāne‘ohe Bay, O ‘ahu, Hawai‘i. Coral Reefs 26(4):911
Coles SL, Marchetti J, Bolick H, Montgomery A (2007) Assessment of invasiveness of the orange keyhole sponge Mycale armata in Kāne‘ohe Bay, O ‘ahu, Hawai‘i (Final Report, 2). Bishop Museum Technical Report, 2006–2
Conklin EJ, Smith JE (2005) Abundance and spread of the invasive red alage, Kappaphycus spp in Kãneʻohe Bay, Hawaiʻi and an experimental assessment of management options. Biol Invasions 7(6):1029–1039
Cook EJ, Payne R, Macleod A, Brown S (2016) Marine biosecurity: protecting indigenous marine species. Res Rep Biodivers Stud 5:1–14
Corinaldesi C, Damiani E, Marcellini F, Falugi C, Tiano L, Brugè F, Danovaro R (2017) Sunscreen products impair the early developmental stages of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. Sci Rep 7:7815
Cortez FS, Pereira CDS, Santos AR, Cesar A, Choueri RB, de Assis Martini G, Bohrer-Morel MB (2012) Biological effects of environmentally relevant concentrations of the pharmaceutical Triclosan in the marine mussel Perna perna (Linnaeus, 1758). Environ Pollut 168:145–150
CIR (Cosmetic Ingredient Review) (2005) Annual review of cosmetic ingredient safety assessments: 2003/2003. Int J Toxicol 24:1–102
Cravens ZM, Brown VA, Divill TJ, Boyles JG (2018) Illuminating prey selection in an insectivorous bat community exposed to artificial light at night. J Appl Ecol 55:705–713
Creed JC (2006) Two invasive alien azooxanthellate corals, Tubastraea coccinea and Tubastraea tagusensis, dominate the native zooxanthellate Mussismilia hispida in Brazil. Coral Reefs 25:350
Dale JJ, Gray MD, Popper AN, Rogers PH, Block BA (2015) Hearing thresholds of swimming Pacific Bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis. J Comp Physiol A 201:441–454
Danovaro R, Bongiorni L, Corinaldesi C, Giovannelli D, Damiani E, Astolfi P, Greci L, Puseddu A (2008) Sunscreens cause coral bleaching by promoting viral infections. Environ Health Perspect 116(4):441–447
Davies TW, Bennie J, Gaston KJ (2012) Street lighting changes the composition of invertebrate communities. Biol Let 8(5):764–767
Davies TW, Bennie J, Inger R, Gaston KJ (2013) Artificial light alters natural regimes of night-time sky brightness. Sci Rep 3:1722
Davies TW, Duffy JP, Bennie J, Gaston KJ (2014) The nature, extent and ecological implications of marine light pollution. Front Ecol Environ 12(6):347–355
Davies TW, Coleman M, Griffith KM, Jenkins SR (2015) Night-time lighting alters the composition of marine epifaunal communities. Biol Let 11:20150080
Davidson A, Campbell ML, Hewitt CL, Schaffelke B (2015) Assessing the impacts of nonindigenous marine macroalgae: an update of current knowledge. J Botanica Marina 58(2):55–79
Depledge MH, Godard-Codding CAJ, Bowen RE (2010) Light pollution in the sea. Mar Pollut Bull 60:1383–1385
Den Hartog C (1970) The sea-grasses of the world. North-Holland, Amsterdam. P 21. Available at: https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNAAM467.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2022
De Silva SS, Nguyen TT, Turchini GM, Amarasinghe US, Abery NW (2009) Alien species in aquaculture and biodiversity: a paradox in food production. Ambio 38(1):24–28, 19260343
di Franco E, Pierson P, Di Iorio L, Calò A, Cottalorda JM, Derijard B, Di Franco A, Galvé A, Guibbolini M, Lebrun J, Micheli F, Priouzeau F, Risso-de Faverney C, Rossi F, Sabourault C, Spennato G, Verrando P, Guidetti P (2020) Effects of marine noise pollution on Mediterranean fishes and invertebrates: a review. Mar Pollut Bull 159:111450
Di Lorio L, Audax M, Deter J, Holon F, Lossent J, Gervaise C, Boissery P (2021) Biogeography of acoustic biodiversity of NW Mediterranean coralligenous reefs. Sci Rep 11:16991
Dimitriadis C, Fournari-Konstantinidou I, Sourbès L, Koutsoubas D, Mazaris AD (2018) Reduction of sea turtle population recruitment caused by nightlight: evidence from the Mediterranean region. Ocean Coastal Manage 153:108–115
Dong ZG, Chen YH, Ge HX, Li XY, Wu HL, Wang CH, Hu Z, Wu YJ, Fu GH, Lu JK, Che H (2018) Response of growth and development of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) to thermal discharge from a nuclear power plant. BMC Ecol 18(1):31
Downs CA, Kramarsky E, Fauth JE, Segal R, Bronstein O, Jeger R, Lichtenfeld Y, Woodley CM, Pennington P, Kushmaro A, Loya Y (2014) Toxicological effects of the sunscreen UV filter, benzophenone-2, on planulae and in vitro cells of the coral, Stylophora pistillata. Ecotoxicology 23:175–191
Downs CA, Kramarsky-Winter E, Segal R, Fauth J, Knutson S, Bronstein O, Ciner FR, Jeger R, Lichtenfeld Y, Woodley CM, Pennington P, Cadenas K, Kushmaro A, Loya Y (2016) Toxicopathological effects of the sunscreen UV filter, oxybenzone (benzophenone-3), on coral planulae and cultured primary cells and its environmental contamination in Hawaii and the US Virgin Islands. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 70(2):265–288
Duarte C, Quintanilla-Ahumada D, Anguita C, Manríquez PH, Widdicombe S, Pulgar J, Silva-Rodríguez EA, Miranda C, Manríquez K, Quijón PA (2019) Artificial light pollution at night (ALAN) disrupts the distribution and circadian rhythm of a sandy beach isopod. Environ Pollut 248:565–573
Erbe C, Dunlop R, Jenner KCS, Jenner MNM, McCauley RD, Parnum I, Parsons M, Rogers T, Salgado-Kent C (2017) Review of underwater and in-air sounds emitted by Australian and Antarctic marine mammals. Acoust Aust 45:179–241
Erbe C, Dunlop R, Dolman S (2018). Effects of noise on marine mammals. In: Slabbekoorn H, Dooling R, Popper A, Fay R (eds) Effects of anthropogenic noise on animals. Springer, New York, pp 277–309
Erbe C, Marley SA, Schoeman RP, Smith JN, Trigg LE, Embling C. (2019. The effects of ship noise on marine mammals—a review. Front Mar Sci 6(606)
Falchi F, Cinzano P, Duriscoe D, Kyba CCM, Elvidge CD, Baugh K, Portnov BA, Rybnikova NA, Furgoni R (2016) The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness. Sci Adv 2(6):e1600377
Faulkner RC, Farcas A, Merchant ND (2018) Guiding principles for assessing the impact of underwater noise. J Appl Ecol 55(6):2531–2536
Fobert EK, Schubert KP, da Silva KB (2021) The influence of spectral composition of artificial light at night on clownfish reproductive success. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 540:151559
Farnworth B, Innes J, Kelly C, Littler R, Waas JR (2018) Photons and foraging: artificial light at night generates avoidance behaviour in male, but not female, New Zealand weta. Environ Pollut 236:82–90
Frisk GV (2012) Noiseonomics: the relationship between noise levels in the sea and global economic trends. Sci Rep 2:437
Garratt MJ, Jenkins SR, Davies TW (2019) Mapping the consequences of artificial light at night for intertidal ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 691:760–768
Gaston KJ, Davies TW, Nedelec SL, Holt LA (2017) Impacts of artificial light at night on biological timings. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 48:49–68
Gaston KJ (2018) Lighting up the nighttime. Science 362:8226
Gleason DF, Edmunds PJ, Gates RD (2006) Ultraviolet radiation effects on the behaviour and recruitment of larvae from the reef coral Porites astreoides. Mar Biol 148:503–512
Gomes NGM, Madureura-Carvalho A, Dias-da-Silva D, Valentāo P, Andrade PB (2021) Biosynthetic versatility of marine-derived fungi on the delivery of novel antibacterial agents against priority pathogens. Biomed Pharmacother 140:111756
Godwin LS (2003) Hull fouling of maritime vessels as pathway for marine species invasions to the Hawaiʻian Islands. Biofouling 19(S1):123–131
Grosholz E (2002) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17(1):22–27
Guette A, Godet L, Juigner M, Robin M (2018) Worldwide increase in artificial light at night around protected areas and within biodiversity hotspots. Biol Cons 223:97–103
Halden RU (2014) On the need and speed of regulating triclosan and triclocarban in the US. Environ Sci Technol 48:3603–3611
Halden RU, Paull DH (2015) Co-occurrence of triclocarban and triclosan in US water resources. Environ Sci Technol 39:1420–1426
Halfwerk W, Slabbekoorn H (2015) Pollution going multimodal: the complex impact of the human-altered sensory environment on animal perception and performance. Biol Let 11:20141051
Halliday WD, Pine MK, Insley SJ (2020) Underwater noise and Arctic marine mammals: review and policy recommendations. Environ Rev 28(4):438–448
Hawkins AD, Popper AN (2017) A sound approach to assessing the impact of underwater noise on marine fishes and invertebrates. ICES J Mar Sci 74(3):635–651
Hildebrand JA (2009) Anthropogenic and natural sources of ambient noise in the ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 395:5–20
HISC (Hawaiʻi Invasive Species Council) (2019) Kappaphycus algae. Available at: https://dlnr.hawaii.gov/hisc/info/invasive-species-profiles/kappapchyus-algae/. Accessed 17 Dec 2021
Hopkins SR, Richardson JI (eds) (1984) A recovery plan for marine turtles, p 355. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/oregonfwo/documents/RecoveryPlans/Marine_Turtles_RP.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2022
Hu MY, Yan H-Y, Chung W-S, Hwang P-P (2009) Acoustically evoked potentials in two cephalopods inferred using the auditory brainstem response (ABR) approach. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol 153(3):278–283
Huang F, Lin J, Zheng B (2019) Effects of thermal discharge from coastal nuclear power plants and thermal power plants on the thermocline characteristics in sea areas with different tidal dynamics. Water 11:2577
Horricks RA, Tabin SK, Edwards JJ, Lumsden JS, Marancik DP (2019) Organic ultraviolet filters in nearshore waters and in the invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans) in Grenada West Indies. PLoS One, 0220280
Issakhov A, Zhandaulet Y (2019) Numerical simulation of thermal pollution zones’ formations in the water environment from the activities of the power plant. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 13(1):279–299
Jelassi R, Ayari A, Nasri-Ammar K (2014) Effect of light intensity on the locomotor activity rhythm of Orchestia montagui and Orchestia gammarellus from the supralittoral zone of Bizerte lagoon (North of Tunisia). Biol Rhythm Res 45(5):817–829
Jerem P, Mathews F (2020) Trends and knowledge gaps in field research investigating effects of anthropogenic noise. Conserv Biol 35(1):115–129
Kamalakannan B, Jeevamani JJ, Nagendran NA, Pandiaraja D, Chandrasekaran S (2014) Impact of removal of invasive species Kappaphycus alvarezii from coral reef ecosystem in Gulf of Mannar, India. Curr Sci 106(10):1401–1408
Kennicutt MC (2017) Water quality of the Gulf of Mexico. In: Ward C (ed) Habitats and Biota of the Gulf of Mexico: Before the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. Springer, New York, pp 55–164
Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Zaugg SD, Barber LB, Buxton HT (2002) Pharmaceuticals, hormones and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams, 1999–2000: a national reconnaissance. Environ Sci Technol 36:1202–1211
Kunc HP, McLaughlin KE, Schmidt R (2016) Aquatic noise pollution: implications for individuals, populations, and ecosystems. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 283:20160839
Labille J, Slomberg D, Catalano R, Robert S, Apers-Tremelo ML, Boudenne JL, Manasfi T, Radakovitch O (2020) Assessing UV filter inputs into beach waters during recreational activity: A field study of three French Mediterranean beaches from consumer survey to water analysis. Sci Total Environ 706:136010
Lages BG, Fleury BG, Menegola C, Creed JC (2011) Change in tropical rocky shore communities due to an alien coral invasion. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 438:85–96
Lanzas C, Davies K, Erwin S, Dawson D (2019) On modelling environmentally transmitted pathogens. Interface Focus 10:20190056
Lecchini D, Bertucci F, Gache C, Khalife A, Besson M, Roux N, Berthe C, Singh S, Parmentier E, Nugues MM, Brooker RM, Dixson DL, Hédouin L (2018) Boat noise prevents soundscape-based habitat selection by coral planulae. Sci Rep 8:9283
Li VW, Tsui MP, Chen X, Hui MNY, Jin L, Lam RHW, Yu RMK, Murphy MB, Cheng J, Lam PKS, Cheng SH (2016) Effects of 4-methylbenzylidene camphor (4-MBC) on neuronal and muscular development in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Environ Sci Pollut Res (int) 23:8275–8285
Lillis A, Eggleston D, Bohnenstiehl D (2014) Soundscape variation from a larval perspective: the case for habitat-associated sound as a settlement cue for weakly swimming estuarine larvae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 509:57–70
Linke S, Gifford T, Desjonquères C, Tonolla D, Aubin T, Barclay L, Karaconstaintis C, Kennard MJ, Ryback F, Sueur J (2018) Freshwater ecoacoustics as a tool for continuous ecosystem monitoring. Front Ecol Environ 16:231–238
Littlefair JE, Hrenchuck LE, Blanchfield PJ, Rennie MD, Cristescue ME (2020) Thermal stratification and fish thermal preference explain vertical eDNA distributions in lakes. Mol Ecol 30913:3083–3096
Liu JL, Wong MH (2013) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs): a review on environmental contamination in China. Environ Int 59:208–224
Longcore T, Rich C (2004) Ecological light pollution. Front Ecol Environ 2:191–198
Lorne J, Salmon M (2007) Effects of exposure to artificial lighting on orientation of hatchling sea turtles on the beach and in the ocean. Endangered Species Res 3:23–30
Lovell JM, Findlay MM, Maote RM, Yan HY (2005) The hearing abilities of the prawn Palaemon serratus. Comp Biochem Physiol A 140(1):89–100
Loya Y, Sakai K, Yamazato K, Nakano Y, Sambali H, van Woesik R (2001) Coral bleaching: the winners and the losers. Ecol Lett 4:122–131
Ludvigsen M, Berge J, Geoffroy M, Cohen JH, De La Torre PR, Nornes SM, Singh H, Sørensen AJ, Daase M, Johnsen G (2018) Use of an autonomous surface vehicle reveals small-scale diel vertical migrations of zooplankton and susceptibility to light pollution under low solar irradiance. Sci Adv 4:9887
Mack RN, Simberloff D, Mark Lonsdale W, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10(3):689–710
Mackay D, Barnthouse L (2010) Integrated risk assessment of household chemicals and consumer products: addressing concerns about triclosan. Integr Environ Assess Manag 6:390–392
Maggi E, Benedetti-Cecchi L (2018) Trophic compensation stabilizes marine primary producers exposed to artificial light at night. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 606:1–5
Maggi E, Bertocci I, Benedetti-Cecchi L (2019) Light pollution enhances temporal variability of photosynthetic activity in mature and developing biofilm. Hydrobiologia 847:1793–1802
Maggi E, Bongiorni L, Fontanini D, Capocchi A, Dal Bello M, Giacomelli A, Benedetti-Cecchi L (2020) Artificial light at night erases positive interactions across trophic levels. Funct Ecol 34:694–706
Maggi E, Serôdio J (2020) Artificial light at night: a new challenge in microphytobenthos research. Front Mar Sci 7:329
Marshall DJ, McQuaid CD (2020) Metabolic regulation, oxygen limitation and heat tolerance in a subtidal marine gastropod reveal the complexity of predicting climate change vulnerability. Front Physiol 11:1106
Martinez JA, Smith CM, Richmond RH (2012) Invasive algal mats degrade coral reef physical habitat quality. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 99:42–49
McAvoy DC, Schatowitz B, Jacob M, Hauk A, Eckhoff WS (2002) Measurement of triclosan in wastewater treatment systems. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1323–1329
Merchant ND, Fristup KM, Johnson MP, Tyack PL, Witt MJ, Blondel P, Parks SE (2015) Measuring acoustic habitats. Methods Ecol Evol 6:257–265
Miller IB, Pawlowski S, Kellerman MY, Petersen-Thiery M, Moeller M, Nietzer S, Schupp PJ (2021) Toxic effects of UV filters from sunscreens on coral reefs revisited: regulatory aspects for “reef safe” products. Environ Sci Eur 33:74
Mokhtari R, Arabkoohsar A (2021) Feasibility study and multi-objective optimization of seawater cooling systems for data centers: a case study of Caspian Sea. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 47:101528
Molnar JL, Gamboa RL, Revenga C, Spalding MD (2008) Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity. Front Ecol Environ 6(9):485–492
Montesdeoca-Esponda S, Checchini L, Del Bubba M, Sosa-Ferrera Z, Santana-Rodriguez J (2018) Analytical approaches for the determination of personal care products and evaluation of their occurrence in marine organisms. Sci Total Environ 633:405–425
Mooney TA, Smith A, Larsen ON, Hansen KA, Wahlberg M, Rasmussen MH (2019) Field-based hearing measurements of two seabird species. The company of biologists. J Exp Biol 222(4):1–7
NRC (National Research Council) (2003) Sources of sound in the ocean and long-term trends in ocean noise. In: Ocean Noise and Marine Mammals. Washington: National Academies Press (US) Committee on potential impacts of ambient noise in the ocean on marine mammals. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK221253/. Accessed 17 Dec 2021
Navara KJ, Nelson RJ (2007) The dark side of light at night: physiological, epidemiological, and ecological consequences. J Pineal Res 43(3):215–224
Naylor E (1999) Marine animal behaviour in relation to lunar phase. Earth Moon Planet 85:291–302
Neilson BJ, Wall CB, Mancini FT, Gewecke CA (2018) Herbivore biocontrol and manual removal successfully reduce invasive macroalgae on coral reefs. PeerJ 6:E5332
Occhipinti-Ambrogi A (2007) Global change and marine communities: alien species and climate change. Mar Pollut Bull 55:342–352
Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Galil B (2010) Marine alien species as an aspect of global change. Adv Oceanogr Limnol 1(1):199–218
O’Connor JJ, Fobert EK, Besson M, Jacob H, Lecchini D (2019) Live fast, die young: behavioural and physiological impacts of light pollution on a marine fish during larval recruitment. Mar Pollut Bull 146:908–914
Ojaveer H, Galil BS, Campbell ML, Carlton JT, Canning-Clode J, Cook EJ, Davidson AD, Hewitt CL, Jelmert A, Marchini A, McKenzie CH, Minchin D, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Olenin S Ruiz G (2015) Classification of non-Indigenous species based on their impacts: considerations for application in marine management. PLoS Biol 13(4): e1002130
Ojemaye CY, Petrik L (2022) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the marine environment around False BAY, Cape Town, South Africa: occurrence and risk-assessment study. Environ Toxicol Chem, 1–21
Olaniyan LWB, Mkwetshana N, Okoh AI (2016) Triclosan in water, implications for human and environmental health. Springerplus 5:1639
Ozáez I, Martίnez-Guitarte JL, Morcillo G (2013) Effects of in vivo exposure to UV filters (4-MBC, OMC, BP-3, 4-HB, OC, OD-PABA) on endocrine signaling genes in the insect Chironomus riparius. Sci Total Environ 456–457:120–126
Padilla DK, Williams SL (2004) Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 2(3):131–138
Paredes E, Perez S, Rodil R, Quintana JB, Beiras R (2014) Ecotoxicological evaluation of four UV filters using marine organisms from different trophic levels Isochrysis galbana, Mytilus galloprovincialis, Paracentrotus lividus, and Siriella armata. Chemosphere 104:44–50
Patterson KL, Porter JW, Ritchie KB, Polson SW, Mueller E, Pesters EC, Santavy DL, Smith GW (2002) The etiology of white pox, a lethal disease of the Carribbean elkhorn coral Acropora palmata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8725–8730
Peck AM (2006) Analytical methods for the determination of persistent ingredients of personal care products in environmental matrices. Anal Bioanal Chem 386:907–939
Pemberthy D, Padilla Y, Echeverri A, Penuela GA (2020) Monitoring pharmaceuticals and personal care products in water and fish from Gulf of Uraba, Columbia. Heliyon 6:e04215
Penar W, Magiera A, Klocek C (2020) Applications of bioacoustics in animal ecology. Ecol Complex 43:100847
Peng C, Zhao X, Liu G (2015) Noise in the sea and its impacts on marine organisms. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:12304–12323
Peters K, Sink K, Robinson TB (2017) Raising the flag on marine alien fouling species. Manage Biol Invasions 8(1):1–11
Pieretti N, Lo Martire M, Corinaldesi C, Musco L, Dell’Anno A, Danovaro R (2020) Anthropogenic noise and biological sounds in a heavily industrialised coastal area (Gulf of Naples, Mediterranean Sea). Mar Environ Res 159:105002
Pilson MEQ (2013) An introduction to the chemistry of the sea, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 539
Pulgar J, Zeballos D, Vargas J, Aldana M, Manriquez, Manriquez K, Quijon PA, Widdicombe S, Anguita C, Quintanilla D, Duarte C (2019) Endogenous cycles, activity patterns and energy expenditure of an intertidal fish is modified by artificial light pollution at night (ALAN). Environ Pollut 244:361–366
Ramirez-Llodra E, Brandt A, Danovaro R, De Mol B, Escobar E, German CR, Levin LA, Martinez Arbizu P, Menot L, Buhl-Mortensen P, Narayanaswamy BE, Smith CR, Tittensor DP, Tyler PA, Vanreusel A, Vecchione M (2010) Deep, diverse and definitely different: unique attributes of the world’s largest ecosystem. Biogeosciences 7(9):2851–2899
Ramos S, Homem V, Alves A, Santos L (2015) Advances in analytical methods and occurrence of organic UV-filters in the environment—a review. Sci Total Environ 526:278–311
Reichelt AJ, Jones GB (1994) Trace metals as tracers of dredging activities in Cleveland Bay-field and laboratory study. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 45:1237–1257
Reichelt-Brushett AJ (2012) Risk assessment and ecotoxicology—limitations and recommendations in the case of ocean disposal of mine waste. Oceanography 25(4):40–51
Reid AJ, Carlson AK, Creed IF, Eliason EJ, Gell PA, Johnson PTJ, Kidd KA, MacCormack TJ, Olden JD, Ormerod SJ, Smol JP, Taylor WW, Tockner K, Vermaire JC, Dudgeon D, Cooke SJ (2019) Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol Rev 94(3):849–873
Rodgers S, Cox EF (1999) Rate of spread of introduced Rhodophytes Kappaphycus alvarezii, Kappaphycus striatum, and Gracilaria Salicornia and their current distribution in Kãneʻohe Bay, O’ahu Hawai’i. Pac Sci 53(3):232–241
Rosenberg Y, Doniger T, Levy O (2019) Sustainability of coral reefs are affected by ecological light pollution in the Gulf of Aqaba/Eilat. Commun Biol 2:289
Ross DJ, Johnson CR, Hewitt CL (2003) Assessing the ecological impacts of an introduced seastar: the importance of multiple methods. Biol Invasions 5(1–2):3–21
Rotter A, Klun K, Francé J, Mozetič P, Orlando-Bonaca M (2020) Non-indigenous species in the Mediterranean Sea: turning from pest to source by developing the 8Rs model, a new paradigm in pollution mitigation. Front Mar Sci 7:178
Ruiz GM, Carlton JT, Grosholz ED, Hines AH (1997) Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent and consequences. Am Zool 37(6):621–632
Russell DJ (1992) The ecological invasion of Hawaiian reefs by two marine red algae, Acanthophora spicifera (Vahl) Boerg. and Hypnea musciformis (Wulfen) J. Ag., and their association with two native species, Laurencia nidifica J. Ag. and Hypnea cervicornis. ICES Mar Sci Symp 194:110–125
Schlacher TA, Stark J, Fischer AB (2007) Evaluation of artificial light regimes and substrate types for aquaria propagation of the staghorn coral Acropora solitaryensis. Aquaculture 269:278–289
Sellers AJ, Saltonstall K, Davidson TM (2015) The introduced alga Kappaphycus alvarezii (Doty ex PC Silva, 1996) in abandoned cultivation sites in Bocas del Toro, Panama. BioInvasions Records 4:1–7
Sendra M, Pintado-Herrera MG, Aguirre-Martínez GV, Monero-Garrido I, Martin-Díaz LM, Lara-Martin PA, Blasco J (2017) Are the TiO2 NPs a “Trojan horse” for personal care products (PCPs) in the clam Ruditapes philippinarum? Chemosphere 185:192–204
Sharma D, Ravindran C (2020) Diseases and pathogens of marine invertebrate corals in Indian reefs. J Invertebr Pathol 173:107373
Short F, Carruthers T, Dennison W, Waycott M (2007) Global seagrass distribution and diversity: a bioregional model. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 350(1–2):3–20
Silva E, Marco A, da Graca J, Perez H, Abella E, Patino-Martinez J, Martins S, Almeida C (2017) Light pollution affects nesting behaviour of loggerhead turtles and predation risk of nests and hatchlings. J Photochem Photobiol, B 173:240–249
Simberloff D (2005) Non-native species do threaten the natural environment. J Agric Environ Ethics 18(6):595–607
Simpson SD, Radford AN, Holles S, Ferarri MCO, Chivers DP, McCormick MI, Meekan MG (2016) Small-boat noise impacts natural settlement behaviour of coral reef fish larvae. In: Popper A, Hawkins A (eds) The effects of noise on aquatic life II. Springer, New York, pp 1041–1048
Slabbekoorn H, Bouton N, van Opzeeland I, Coers A, Cate C, Popper AN (2010) A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish. Trends Ecol Evol 25:419–427
Smith JE, Hunter CL, Smith CM (2002) Distribution and reproductive characteristics of nonindigenous and invasive marine algae in the Hawai’ian Islands. Pac Sci 56(3):299–315
Smyth T, Davies T, McKee D (2020) The global extent of artificial light pollution in the marine environment. 22nd EGU General Assembly (online): 4–8 May 2020. Available at: https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-2415.html. Accessed 17 Dec 2021
Sokolow S (2009) Effects of a changing climate on the dynamics of coral infectious disease: a review of the evidence. Dis Aquatic Organ 87:5–18
Southhall BL, Southall H, Antunes R, Nichols R, Rouse A, Stafford KM, Robards M, Rosenbaum HC (2020) Seasonal trends in underwater ambient noise near St. Lawrence Island and the Bering Strait. Mar Pollut Bull 157:111283
Speight JG (2020) Sources of water pollution. In: Speight J (ed) Natural water remediation chemistry and technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 165–198
Stewart JR, Gast RJ, Fujioka RS, Solo-Gabriele HM, Meschke JS, Amaral-Zettler LA, del Castillo E, Polz MF, Collier TK, Strom MS, Sinigalliano CD, Moeller PDR, Holland AF (2008) The coastal environment and human health: microbial indicators, pathogens, sentinels and reservoirs. Environ Health 7(2):S3
Stauber JL, Adams MS, Batley GE, Golding L, Hargreaves I, Peeters L, Reichelt-Brushett A, Simpson S (2022) A generic environmental risk assessment framework for deep-sea tailings placement using causal networks. Sci Total Environ 845:157311
Strader ME, Davies SW, Matz MV (2015) Differential responses of coral larvae to the colour of ambient light guide them to suitable settlement microhabitat. R Soc Open Sci 2:150358
Sully S, Burkepile DE, Donovan MK, Hodgson G, van Woesik R (2019) A global analysis of coral bleaching over the past two decades. Nat Commun 10:1264
Sulu R, Kumar L, Hay C, Pickering T (2004) Kappaphycus seaweed in the Pacific: review of introductions and field testing proposed quarantine protocols. Sceretariat of the Pacific Community, Noumea, p 84. Available at: https://pacificdata.org/data/hu/dataset/oai-www-spc-int-40680f4a-db48-4c3c-933b-4a81516da05a. Accessed 17 Dec 2021
Tamir R, Lerner A, Haspel C, Dubinsky Z, Iluz D (2017) The spectral and spatial distribution of light pollution in the waters of the northern Gulf of Aqaba (Eilat). Sci Rep 7:42329
Thomsen F, Erbe C, Hawkins A, Lepper P, Popper AN, Scholik-Schlomer A, Sisneros J (2020) Introduction to the special issue on the effects of sound on aquatic life. J Acoust Soc Am 148:934
Turicchia E, Hoeksema BW, Ponti M (2018) The coral-killing sponge Chalinula nematifera as a common substrate generalist in Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Mar Biol Res 14(8):827–833
Tuxbury SM, Salmon M (2005) Competitive interactions between artificial lighting and natural cues during seafinding by hatchling marine turtles. Biol Cons 121(2):311–316
Underwood CN, Davies TW, Queiros AM (2017) Artificial light at night alters trophic interactions of intertidal invertebrates. J Animal Ecol 86:781–789
US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Authority (2008) USEPA-Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Triclosan List B. Case No. 2340, p 98. Available at https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/reregistration/red_PC-054901_18-Sep-08.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2021
Vakili SV, Olcer AL, Ballini F (2020) The development of a policy framework to mitigate underwater noise pollution from commercial vessels. Mar Policy 118:104004
Vare L, Baker M, Howe J, Levin L, Neira C, Ramirez-Llodra E, Reichelt-Brushett A, Rowden A, Shimmield T, Simpson S, Soto E (2018) Scientific considerations for the assessment and management of mine tailing disposal in the deep sea. Front Mar Sci 5:17
Vermeij M, Bak R (2002) How are coral populations structured by light? Marine light regimes and the distribution of Madracis. Mar Ecol Progr Ser, 105–116
Vieira M, Beauchaud M, Amorim MCP, Fonseca PJ (2021) Boat noise affects meagre (Argyrosomus regius) hearing and vocal behaviour. Mar Pollut Bull 172:112824
Vollmer SV, Kline DI (2008) Natural disease resistance in threatened staghorn corals. PLoS ONE 3:e3718
Walther GR, Roques A, Hulme PE, Sykes MT, Pyšek P, Kűhn I, Zobel M, Bacher S, Botta-Dukát Z, Bugmann H, Czúcz B, Dauber J, Hickler T, Jarošík V, Kenis M, Minchin D, Moora M, Nentwig W, Ott J, Panov VE, Reineking B, Robinet C, Semenchenko V, Solarz W, Thuiller W, Vilá M, Vohland K, Settele J (2009) Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 24(12):686–693
Wang H, Xie D, Bowler PA, Zeng Z, Xiong W, Liu C (2021) Non-indigenous species in marine and coastal habitats of the South China Sea. Sci Total Environ 759:143465
Weilgart LS (2007) The impacts of anthropogenic ocean noise on cetaceans and implications for management: review. Can J Zool 85:1091–1116
Williams R, Clark CW, Ponirakis D, Ashe E (2014) Acoustic quality of critical habitats for three threatened whale populations. Anim Conserv 17:174–185
Willette DA, Chalifour J, Debrot AD, Engel MS, Miller J, Oxenford HA, Short FT, Steiner SCC, Védie F (2014) Continued expansion of the trans-Atlantic invasive marine angiosperm Halophila stipulacea in the Eastern Caribbean. Aquat Bot 112:98–102
Witherington BE, Bjorndal KA (1991) Influences of artificial lighting on the seaward orientation of hatchling loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta. Biol Cons 55:139–149
Yurk H, Trites AW (2000) Experimental attempts to reduce predation by Harbor seals on out-migrating juvenile salmonids. Trans Am Fisheries Soc 129:1360–1366
Zapata MJ, Sullivan SMP, Gray S (2019) Artificial lighting at night in estuaries—implications from individuals to ecosystems. Estuaries Coasts 42(2):309–330
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reichelt-Brushett, A., Shah, S.B. (2023). Other Important Marine Pollutants. In: Reichelt-Brushett, A. (eds) Marine Pollution – Monitoring, Management and Mitigation . Springer Textbooks in Earth Sciences, Geography and Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10127-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10127-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10126-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10127-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)