Abstract
Action Track 1 of the Food Systems Summit offers an opportunity to bring together the crucial elements of food safety, nutrition, poverty and inequalities in the framework of food systems within the context of climate and environmental change to ensure that all people have access to a safe and nutritious diet. Achieving Action Track 1’s goal is essential to achieving the goals of the other Action Tracks. With less than a decade left to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), most countries are not on a course to hit either the World Health Organisation’s nutrition targets or the SDG 2 targets. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated malnutrition and highlighted the need for food safety. The pandemic has also exposed the deep inequalities in both food systems and societies as a whole. Nonetheless, future food systems can address many of these failings and ensure safe and nutritious food for all. However, structural change is necessary to address the socio-economic drivers behind malnutrition, inequalities and the climate and environmental impacts of food. Adopting a whole-system approach in policy, research and monitoring and evaluation is crucial for managing trade-off and externalities from farm-level to national scales and across multiple sectors and agencies. Supply chain failures will need to be overcome and technology solutions adopted and adapted to specific contexts. A transformation of food systems requires coordinating changes in supply and demand in differentiated ways across world regions: bridging yield gaps and improving livestock feed conversion, largely through agro-ecological practices, deploying soil carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas mitigation at scale, and reducing food loss and waste, as well as addressing over-nourishment and shifting the diets of wealthy populations. The sustainability of global food systems also requires halting the expansion of agriculture into fragile ecosystems, while restoring degraded forests, fisheries, rangelands, peatlands and wetlands. Shifting to more sustainable consumption and production patterns within planetary boundaries will require efforts to influence food demand and diets, diversify food systems, and develop careful land-use planning and management. Integrative policies need to ensure that food prices reflect real costs (including major externalities caused by climate change, land degradation and biodiversity loss, and the public health impacts of malnutrition), reduce food waste and, at the same time, ensure the affordability of safe and healthy food and decent incomes and wages for farmers and food system workers. The harnessing of science and technology solutions and the sharing of actionable knowledge with all players in the food system offer many opportunities. Greater coordination of food system stakeholders is crucial for greater inclusion, greater transparency and more accountability. Sharing lessons and experiences will foster adaptive learning and responsive actions. Careful consideration of the trade-offs, externalities and costs of not acting is needed to ensure that the changes we make benefit all, and especially the most vulnerable in society.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Action Track 1 of the Food Systems Summit offers an opportunity to bring together the crucial elements of food safety, nutrition, poverty and inequalities in the framework of food systems within the context of climate and environmental change to ensure that all people have access to a safe and nutritious diet. These elements are embedded in fundamental human rights, including the right to food, the rights to safe water and sanitation (essential for safe food), and the right to be free from discrimination.
Food systems provide a framework for advancing access to safe and nutritious food for all (including all crops, fish, forest foods and livestock). Food systems encompass all of the elements and activities that relate to the production, processing, distribution, preparation and consumption of food, as well as the output of these activities, including socio-economic and environmental outcomes (HLPE 2020). Ensuring access to safe and nutritious food for all underlies the other Summit Action Tracks (Fig. 1).
2 What Is a Safe and Nutritious Diet?
A safe and nutritious diet is a healthy diet that “is human health-promoting and disease-preventing. It provides adequacy (without an excess of nutrients) and health-promoting substances from nutritious foods and avoids the consumption of health-harming substances” (Neufeld et al. 2021). A nutritious food “provides beneficial nutrients (e.g., protein, vitamins, minerals, essential amino acids, essential fatty acids, dietary fibre) and minimises potentially harmful elements (e.g. anti-nutrients, quantities of sodium, saturated fats, sugars)” (Neufeld et al. 2021, drawing on GAIN (2017), Drewnowski (2005) and Katz et al. (2011)). Safe food promotes health and is free of foodborne diseases caused by microorganisms, including bacteria, virus, prionics, parasites and chemicals, as well as foodborne zoonoses transferred from animals to humans and other associated risks in the food chain (WHO 2013).
Malnutrition includes undernourishment, micronutrient deficiencies and overweight (including obesity). Malnutrition increases susceptibility to foodborne diseases, creating a vicious cycle for health, reducing productivity and compromising development. The COVID-19 pandemic is expected to increase the risk of all forms of malnutrition (Headey et al. 2020).
Recent reports draw attention to the affordability of a healthy diet (FAO et al. 2020; Masters et al. 2018). The pandemic has exposed long-standing inequalities in our food and health systems that affect access to safe and nutritious food, as well as income that enables this access (Laborde et al. 2020). Shocks (including health shocks such as COVID-19 that increase the need for a nutritious diet) make healthy diets less accessible and affordable.
While the definitions of an adequate diet and safe food are established and widely accepted, there is debate in the literature about what constitutes a sustainable diet. Each proposed diet has trade-offs in terms of affordability, climate and environmental impacts. These trade-offs are discussed in the sections that follow.
3 We Are Not on Track to Meet International Targets for Ensuring Safe and Nutritious Food for All By 2030
Despite some progress in reducing the rate of extreme poverty, with only 10 years to go to 2030, the world is not on track to meet nutrition-related targets. Table 1 presents a summary of the international targets related to ensuring safe and nutritious food for all. While the proportion of the population that is undernourished, stunting, of low birth weight and displaying anaemia among women of reproductive age has declined, the reductions are not sufficient to meet the global targets. The experience of food insecurity (FIES, a survey that comprises eight questions regarding people’s access to adequate food) as measured by FAO et al. (2020) has increased somewhat. Moreover, the numbers of overweight children and adults is rising.
No country is exempt from the scourge of malnutrition. Undernutrition coexists with overweight, obesity and other diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs), even in poor countries. UNICEF et al. (2020) report that 37% of overweight children reside in low and middle-income countries. Likewise, fragile and extremely fragile countries are disproportionally burdened by high levels of all three forms of malnutrition compared to less-fragile countries (GNR 2020).
While some progress has been made in certain countries and in some regions, the 2020 Global Nutrition report shows that no country is ‘on course’ to meet all of WHO’s global nutrition targets (GNR 2020). Although the health and behavioural actions required to reduce all forms of malnutrition are well documented (Lancet report, various WHO guidelines), as are the benefits (Hoddinott, etc.), progress has been far too slow. Inequalities in society and the food system make affordable and healthy diFets inaccessible to the most vulnerable populations. There is an urgent need to transform food systems so as to deliver on nutrition outcomes. Unless nutrition-specific (direct) and nutrition-sensitive (indirect) interventions are implemented at scale and in a sustainable way (see Box 1) with complementary services (such as the regular deworming of children), the impact will be suboptimal (Ruel et al. 2018). In addition, urgent action is necessary to minimise the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children’s nutrition (Headey et al. 2020).
Box 1: Sustainable Food Systems
“Sustainable food systems are: productive and prosperous (to ensure the availability of sufficient food); equitable and inclusive (to ensure access for all people to food and to livelihoods within that system); empowering and respectful (to ensure agency for all people and groups, including those who are most vulnerable and marginalized to make choices and exercise voice in shaping that system); resilient (to ensure stability in the face of shocks and crises); regenerative (to ensure sustainability in all its dimensions); and healthy and nutritious (to ensure nutrient uptake and utilization)” (HLPE 2020).
WFP has predicted that the number of people facing acute food insecurity in low and middle-income countries will nearly double to 265 million by the end of 2020 (WFP 2020). Children are disproportionately affected, with likely intergenerational consequences for child growth and development. The pandemic’s impact could have life-long implications for education, chronic disease risks and overall human capital formation (Martorell 2017).
Approximately 600 million people fall ill through the consumption of contaminated food each year, with considerable differences among sub-regions; with the highest burden observed in Africa (WHO 2020). More than 420,000 die every year, equating to the loss of 33 million Disability-Adjusted Life Years (WHO 2015a). Foodborne diseases disproportionately affect children, accounting for 40% of the foodborne disease burden. The consumption of unsafe foods costs low- and middle-income countries at least US$ 110 billion in lost productivity and medical expenses annually (Jaffee et al. 2019). With a large proportion of emerging human infectious diseases originating from animal sources (zoonotic diseases), there is also an increasing need to consider both animal and human health as a ‘One Health’ issue.
Devleesschauwer et al. (2018) report that food safety is a marginalised policy objective, especially in developing countries. The scale of foodborne outbreaks has become more extensive and has affected more countries since 2004 (INFOSAN 2019), representing a constant threat to public health and an impediment to socio-economic development. However, updated data is not available regarding progress on reducing the incidence of foodborne diseases, presenting a major obstacle to adequately addressing food safety concerns (Devleesschauwer et al. 2018).
A recent innovation is the assessment of the adequacy, affordability and access to healthy diets included in the 2020 State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World (SOFI) report (see affordability, Table 1). If continually updated, this indicator could become a comprehensive proxy for monitoring progress on ensuring safe, nutritious food for all.
4 Interconnected Food System Drivers That Affect the Access to Safe and Nutritious Food for All
Several interconnected socio-economic and biophysical food system drivers affect access to safe and nutritious food. Nutrition is both a health and food system concern. While some drivers of food systems are global (e.g., trade liberalisation, climate change), others are regional, national and sub-national (e.g., conflicts). At the same time, many are differentiated across geographies (e.g., poverty, demography, technologies, land degradation). Below, we provide a brief overview of the main drivers, depicted in Fig. 2. At the centre of the diagram is the food system, spurred by socio-economic, supply chain and climate change and land-use drivers (depicted by the segmented circle). The drivers and the food system are influenced by globalisation and the global COVID-19 pandemic. In certain contexts, the drivers and the food system are also affected by conflict and fragility.
4.1 Socio-Economic Drivers
There is a vast array of socio-economic drivers that increase global food demand, including population growth (Gerten et al. 2020), the westernisation of diets, increased food waste and overweight (including obesity) (Hasegawa et al. 2018), increased demand for animal-sourced foods in diets leading to increased demand of feed from arable crops (Mottet et al. 2017), and rapid urbanisation (van Vliet et al. 2017). These trends could cause a doubling of food demand by 2050 and will require a mean global increase of crop yields by over 30% from 2015 for a range of scenarios without climate change (FAO 2018), a value lower than those in previous projections that assumed rapid economic growth (Alexandratos and Bruinsma 2012).
Globalisation
Lockdowns caused by the COVID-19 pandemic of zoonotic origin have disrupted the production, transportation, and sale of nutritious, fresh and affordable foods, forcing millions of families to rely on nutrient-poor alternatives (Fore et al. 2020). International food trade can increase the diversity of diets and has established a global standard food supply, which is relatively species-rich regarding measured crops at the national level, but species-poor globally (Khoury et al. 2014). Globalised food trade can also contribute to unsustainable water use (Rosa et al. 2019) and land degradation (IPCC 2019). The availability of cheap, high-energy, fatty and sugary foods, the high price of nutritious fresh foods and the demand for more ‘westernised’ and often obesogenic foods increase the incidence of nutrition-related NCDs (Chaudhary et al. 2018). Nevertheless, globalised supply chains support the wide distribution of food, reducing shortages in import-dependent regions (Janssens et al. 2020), improving seasonal availability and often reducing food loss through technological advances in processing, packaging and storage (Zilberman et al. 2019).
Demography and Urbanisation
Although population growth has slowed globally, the population in the 47 least developed countries (mostly in Africa and Asia) is projected to double between 2019 and 2050. By 2030, the number of youths in Africa will have increased by 42% from 2015. Nevertheless, in 2018, for the first time in history, the proportion of older persons (above 65) outnumbered that of children under five, a trend that is predicted to continue (UNDESA 2019). A growing proportion of older people will put a strain on the health system and change nutritional needs and dietary preferences. Aging is accompanied by multiple physiological changes that affect diets and nutrition. This may include a lower sense of taste and/or smell; reduced appetite; poor oral health and dental problems; lower gastric acid secretion that may affect the absorption of minerals and vitamins; and loss of vision and hearing and reduced mobility that may limit mobility and affect elderly people’s ability to shop for food and prepare meals (WHO 2015b). Moreover, by 2050, 68% of the global population could be urban, shifting the proportion of producers to consumers, changing consumption patterns (demand), driving land take and putting extra pressure on soil resources (Barthel et al. 2019; van Vliet et al. 2017).
Poverty and Inequality
Poverty traps millions in poor nutrition, depriving them of their potential. The prevalence of both undernutrition and overweight adults is directly linked with relative food prices (Headey and Alderman 2019). Healthy diets cost roughly 60% and 400% more than nutrient-adequate and energy-sufficient diets, respectively (FAO et al. 2020). More than 1.5 billion people cannot afford a nutrient-adequate diet and over three billion cannot afford even the cheapest of healthy diets (FAO 2011). Food system disruptions caused by COVID-19 measures have aggravated this situation (Headey et al. 2020). The out-of-pocket costs on health care spent by the poorest billion due to NCDs and injuries may be high, accounting for 60–70% of the public health care costs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries (Zuccala and Horton 2020). In total, it has been estimated by the World Bank that under- and malnourishment costs 3% of global GDP, and overweight and obesity another 2% (Jaffee et al. 2019).
Women play a key role in multiple components of food systems and in decisions over food choices. Nonetheless, inequalities and barriers related to access to farming opportunities and services such as extension, credit, digital platforms for knowledge and market access constrain their participation relative to men (Quisumbing et al. 2011). Inequalities and barriers also affect the nutrition and health of minorities and off-farm and food system workers (including migrants and undocumented workers), which is a barrier to food system and societal transformation (CFS 2020).
Conflict and Fragility
Conflict can be both a cause and an outcome of food insecurity. Increased competition for natural resources leads to conflict and political fragility, exacerbated by the failure of traditional conflict resolution mechanisms to adapt to the new governance system of communities (FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO 2017). Government and political institutions (municipalities, legal systems and political party structures) have not adapted to the social fabric they presently govern, constraining development and also affecting development and the delivery of humanitarian aid.
While widespread famine has largely been eradicated, the nature of food crises has changed in recent times. The Food Security Information Network (FSIN 2020) reports that, in 2019, about 135 million people were affected by crisis levels of acute food insecurity, reflecting an increase of 11 million people from the previous year (FSIN 2020). While these crises are largely driven by conflict and economic downturns, they have a severe effect on the ability of people to access food. The provision of food transfers in emergency situations may alter the food preferences of communities, leading to changes in production and consumption post-conflict.
The largest numbers of acutely food-insecure people are in Africa, where extreme weather events in the continent’s Horn and its southern region have led to widespread hunger. In many parts of the world, armed conflicts, intercommunal violence and other localised tensions create insecurity (FSIN 2020). Adverse climate events and stresses compound violence, displacement and disrupted agriculture and trade. Often, those affected by crises flee to neighbouring countries, putting additional stress on the international humanitarian response system and on the food systems of the host countries. Women and girls are disproportionately affected by crises. Populations in crisis are disproportionally vulnerable to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and have little capacity to cope with the health and socio-economic aspects of the shock (FSIN 2020). WFP predicts that the number of people in LMICs facing acute food insecurity will nearly double to 265 million by the end of 2020 (WFP 2020). Moreover, fragile and extremely fragile countries are disproportionally burdened by high levels of malnutrition compared to non-fragile countries (GNR 2020).
4.2 Supply Chain Failures and Under-Utilised Technologies Affecting the Supply of Food
The focus of food supply has shifted over the past few decades from ‘feeding the world’ to ‘nourishing the world’, but technological advancements still lag behind, and many supply-side factors and failures affect the ability of the food system to sustainably (see Box 1) ensure access to safe and nutritious food for all. In many developing countries (especially in Africa), supply chain failures and the under-utilisation of technology are major constraints on the ability of the transformation of food systems to achieve this access. More than half of the calories consumed by humans are provided by three major cereal crops (rice, maize, and wheat) with a high-calorie output, and current research investments are positively correlated with the energy output of crops, with a number of crop species (e.g., sweet potato, potato, wheat, broad bean, and lentil) remaining under-researched relative to their contribution to healthy human nutrition (Manners and van Etten 2018). Orphan crops that are usually well adapted to low-input agricultural conditions have received little attention from researchers (Tadele 2019). There is a growing recognition that the development of perennial versions of important grain crops and grasses could expand options for ensuring food and ecosystem security (Glover et al. 2020). Viable high biomass perennial grain crops could be further developed in agroecosystems that regenerate soils and capture other important ecosystem functions (Crews and Cattani 2018). In the same way, this lack of research applies to some fruit and vegetable crops and local livestock breeds, especially for small ruminants, as well as fish.
Closing yield gaps on underperforming lands and increasing cropping efficiency would have considerable potential to meet an increasing food demand (Foley et al. 2011). One main reason why yield gaps exist is that farmers do not have sufficient economic incentives to adopt yield-enhancing seeds or cropping techniques, including mechanisation, precision and digital agriculture. Moreover, a lack of access to extension services, to formal credit and cooperative membership, often limits technology adoption, which is associated with positive household welfare effects (Wossen et al. 2017). While efficiency and substitution are steps towards sustainable intensification, system redesign may be essential for agro-ecological intensification through, e.g., integrated pest management, conservation agriculture, integrated crop and biodiversity, pasture and forage, trees, irrigation management and small or patch systems (Pretty et al. 2018).
Currently, 25–30% of total food produced is lost or wasted (IPCC 2019), equating to about one-quarter of land, water, and fertiliser used for crop production (Shafiee-Jood and Cai 2016). Food losses and food waste occur throughout the food chain. They constrain food system sustainability due to their adverse effects on food security, natural resources, environment, climate and human health (e.g., toxic emissions from incineration) (Xue et al. 2017).
Plant biotechnologies are mostly used for fibre and animal feed, less often for food, because of regulatory constraints and intellectual property rights barriers (Barrows et al. 2014). New and innovative technologies such as biotechnologies, precision agriculture and digital agriculture, alternative protein sources, under-utilised food sources and the use of biomass for bioenergy and green chemicals need to be harnessed to improve food systems (reviewed below). However, such advances can also drive negative food system changes. For example, biofuel production based on grains from food crops can drive up staple food prices and increase competition for land, exacerbating inequalities.
4.3 Climate Change, Land-Use Change and Natural Resource Degradation
Climate change, including increases in the frequency and intensity of extremes, has adversely impacted food security, affecting the yields of some crops (e.g., maize and wheat) and the pastoral systems in low latitude regions (IPCC 2019). Climate change may aggravate food system problems in countries with delicate food security balances and relatively high levels of vulnerability to climate change due to the large-scale use of scarce resources (water, land, etc.) for feed and food production for exports, particularly in the case of mono cropping. Diets and cropping patterns may change as climate factors constrain the production of traditionally grown crops.
With increasing warming, the frequency, intensity and duration of heatwaves, droughts and extreme rainfall events are projected to increase in most world regions, increasingly threatening the stability of food supplies (IPCC 2019). For example, Gaupp et al. (2020) found an estimated 86% probability of losses across the world’s maize breadbaskets with warming of 4 °C, compared to 7% probability for 2 °C warming under business-as-usual conditions and without considering crop adaptation to climate change. Likewise, in a business-as-usual scenario, Alae-Carew et al.’s (2020) review of predicted changes in environmental exposures has reported likely reductions in yields of non-staple vegetables and legumes. Where adaptation possibilities are limited, this may substantially change their global availability, affordability and consumption in the mid- to long term (Alae-Carew et al. 2020; Scheelbeek et al. 2018). The nutritional quality of crops may also be affected by rising atmospheric CO2 levels through reduced proteins and micronutrient contents (IPCC 2019). Labour productivity is also likely to reduce with increasing temperatures (Watts et al. 2021).
The global food system (from farm inputs to consumers) emits about 30% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHG), contributes to 80% of tropical deforestation and is a main driver of land degradation and desertification, water scarcity and biodiversity decline (IPCC 2019). About one-quarter of the Earth’s ice-free land area is subject to human-induced degradation and about 500 million people live within areas undergoing desertification (IPCC 2019). By 2050, land degradation and climate change could lead to a reduction of global crop yields by about 10%, with strong negative impacts in India, China and sub-Saharan Africa resulting in the displacement of up to 700 million people (Cherlet et al. 2018). Around two billion people live within watersheds exposed to water scarcity, a number that could double by 2050 (Gosling and Arnell 2016). Future agricultural productivity in the tropics is also at risk from a deforestation-induced increase in mean temperature and the associated heat extremes, as well as from a decline in rainfall (Lawrence and Vandecar 2015). Over half of the tropical forests worldwide have been destroyed since the 1960s, affecting the lives of one billion poor people whose livelihoods depend on forests and set to equal a mass extinction event should tropical deforestation continue unabated (Alroy 2017).
5 Transforming Food Systems Is Key to Safe and Nutritious Food for All
Business-as-usual is not an option with the future of food and nutrition security in jeopardy. Changing the path of our future will demand a structural transformation (transitioning from low productivity and labour-intensive economic activities to higher productivity, sustainable and skill-intensive activities) of food systems. This will require changes in the allocation of resources, and research attention to factors beyond production will be necessary in order to transition to more sustainable patterns of production and consumption (CFS 2020). More concerted effort is needed to coordinate activities, monitor progress more closely and extract greater accountability from all players across the food system. Priority should be given to the establishment of functional problem-solving institutions that address the core challenges facing each of the various components of the global food systems.
A global social compact (an implicit agreement among the members of a society to cooperate for social benefits) is needed to manage the demand and consumption drivers and harness science, technology and innovation for the purpose of improving the sustainable production of enough food to ensure access to affordable, safe and nutritious foods for all (Fig. 3). The sections below identify some of the levers for change.
5.1 Coordination, Monitoring and Accountability
The ambition of the CFS is to be “the most inclusive international and intergovernmental platform for all stakeholders to work together in a coordinated way to ensure food security and nutrition for all” (CFS 2021). Moreover, UN agencies and their partners have converged through various mechanisms for food security coordination (e.g., FSIN, the Global Network Against Food Crises, expanding the SOFI collaborators, the CFS Global Strategic Framework, etc.). Strengthening global governance and accountability regarding safe and nutritious food for all and sustainable food systems is key to meeting the challenges ahead and will require the cross-sectoral integration of policies. Nonetheless, agriculture, development and trade policies that affect access to food, as well as other dimensions of food systems, are often dealt with in separate for a (De Schutter 2013). Therefore, improved coordination, monitoring and accountability across the food system and among all stakeholders is necessary, including knowledge-sharing, capacity-building, better measurement, updated data, better modelling for foresight, scenarios and case studies and access to documented success stories. Food systems bring together elements from various sectors of society: agriculture, consumer affairs, food processing, health, trade, water and sanitation, women’s and child welfare, etc., challenging the sectoral organisation found in most countries.
If we are to transform food systems to ensure safe and nutritious food for all from a model of sustainability, a concerted effort is needed to develop a global compact – a non-binding agreement to encourage the transformation of food systems – and appropriate accountability of all stakeholders to monitor agreed-upon transformation targets. Integrated, science-based policies (health and nutrition, food and agriculture, climate and environment) would allow for reinforcing accountability at both national and international scales.
Advances in information technology and data science play an important role in enabling the rapid assessment of situations, monitoring and decision-making and adaptive learning. An integrated global food system model is needed, as existing models (see Valin et al. 2014; Khanna and Zilberman 2012) do not have consistent global coverage and are not designed to assess the impacts of all of the elements of food systems. Strengthening national policy scenarios and foresight is also necessary (Schmidt-Traub et al. 2019). Moreover, improved indicators of food systems (see FAO et al. 2020) are required (see Sukhdev 2018; Chaudhary et al. 2018, for examples) that could provide more holistic measures capturing the four elements addressed by Action Track 1, namely, safety, nutrition, inequality and sustainability.
Rigorous global monitoring systems require global collaboration, updated information, and investment with significant returns. The monitoring of underlying systemic risks (perhaps using artificial intelligence or machine learning), as well as food system indicators, is essential to identify threats/pressure at an earlier stage. A task force charged with global monitoring and data collection opportunities about agri-food systems could provide a clearinghouse for the multiple (often duplicated) data held by UN agencies and public and private organisations. While some effort has been made to coordinate international actions to address crises, access to food requires targeted interventions for the most vulnerable. Two-way real-time and artificial intelligence applications for collecting information of systemic risks and food systems and disseminating information to various stakeholders and beneficiaries are needed in last-mile and crises situations and in regions disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic food system disruptions. This could include driving supply-side demand through food banks, social grants, subsidised meals, vouchers and other food assistance (including through e-commerce systems) (WFP 2017).
5.2 Influencing Food Demand and Dietary Changes
There are several ways to reduce demand on the global food system in both the short and long term and make nutritious foods more available and affordable (see Herrero et al. 2021). Some of these may be achieved by accelerating demographic transitions, increasing incomes, reducing food losses and waste and changing diets.
Household food waste is proliferating in emerging economies and is likely to increase without deliberate efforts to curb it (Barrera and Hertel 2020). Halving food losses and waste is a target of SDG 12 that could help feed more people, benefit climate and the environment and conserve water (Kummu et al. 2012; Searchinger et al. 2018; IPCC 2019). This requires changes along supply chains (agricultural production, food processing, distribution/retail, restaurant food service, institutional food service, and households) through improved logistics and processing technologies, economic incentives, regulatory approaches and education campaigns (Barrera and Hertel 2020). The amount of food waste/loss varies greatly from region to region, and therefore context-specific interventions are crucial (Hodson et al. 2021).
Private investment is needed to develop food processing, refrigeration, storage, warehousing, and retail markets to reduce food waste. Vertical integration of food chains can shorten said chains to the benefit of smallholder farmers, while trade can expand market opportunities. Compared to a business-as-usual scenario, a combined scenario targeting undernourishment while also reducing over-consumption and food waste would reduce food demand by 9% in 2050 (Hasegawa et al. 2018).
Because of the strong associations between female education, fertility and infant mortality, alternative education scenarios alone (assuming similar education-specific fertility and mortality levels) lead to a difference of more than one billion people in the world population sizes projected for 2050 (Lutz and Samir 2011; Samir and Lutz 2017), and could therefore reduce the rise in food demand.
Balanced diets, featuring plant-based foods, such as those based on coarse grains, legumes, fruits and vegetables, nuts and seeds, complemented by animal-sourced food produced in resilient, sustainable and low-GHG emission systems present major opportunities for the adaptation and mitigation of climate change while generating significant co-benefits in terms of human health (Springmann et al. 2018; IPCC 2019; Jarmul et al. 2020). ‘Healthy sustainable diets’ can be defined by optimisation procedures (Donati et al. 2016). However, most diets have trade-offs among nutritional values, affordability and environmental issues (Headey and Alderman 2019).
Populations with a high prevalence of undernutrition and micronutrient deficiencies (Fanzo 2019) benefit from increasing the consumption of animal-sourced products due to the bioavailability of key micro-nutrients (Perignon et al. 2017). Many highly nutritious foods may simply be unaffordable to poorer populations and displaced by cheap, nutrient-poor foods. Moreover, a balance is necessary between meeting the demand for diversified, nutritious and affordable food and minimising the time and energy needed to prepare meals.
Policies can create incentives for change. Urgent public policy action is needed to create incentives for creating healthy, sustainable food systems and delivering safe, nutritious and affordable foods for all. Policy options could be used to manage food demand, shift consumption patterns, reduce the environmental footprint of food systems and ensure equity across the food system. A wide range of well-established and relatively inexpensive policy options and interventions are available for improving nutrition at the individual level (Bukhman et al. 2020; Hawkes et al. 2019; Bhutta et al. 2008). Policies that enable healthy food environments (such as sugar taxes, educational food labelling, salt reduction, the prohibition of trans-fats and a reduction in the use of high-fructose corn syrup) are core to improving food environments and limiting the burden of NCDs. Increasing the diversity of food sources in public procurement, health insurance, financial incentives and awareness-raising campaigns can potentially influence food demand, reduce healthcare costs, contribute to reducing GHG emissions and enhance adaptive capacity.
Increased income can drive food demand, especially in terms of diversification away from staple crops to more diverse and nutrient-dense foods (diary, fruit, meat, nuts and vegetables). Likewise, income from social protection programmes can drive changes in dietary composition and quality (Alderman 2016). The evidence reviewed in this paper indicates that subsidies on fortified foods can have positive nutritional effects, and in-kind transfers may limit food deficits during periods of currency or price volatility. The affordability of healthy diets can be improved with the distribution of biofortified food in government schemes, cash transfers and nutrition programmes. However, price subsidies and in-kind assistance have complex interactions in regard to markets and purchasing decisions, with both negative implications and benefits (Alderman 2016).
5.3 Shifting to More Sustainable Consumption and Production Within Planetary Boundaries
Nutrition outcomes in developing countries are affected by agriculture in several ways: as a source of food for household consumption and of income, through the role of food prices and agricultural policies, through the role of women’s employment in agriculture for nutrition, child care and child feeding and their own nutritional and health status (Gillespie and van den Bold 2017).
There are more than 570 million farms worldwide, most of which are small and family-operated. Between 1960 and the turn of the century, the average farm size decreased in most lower- to middle-income countries, whereas it increased in most high-income countries (Lowder et al. 2016). The diversity of agricultural production diminishes as farm size increases (Herrero et al. 2017). Hence, as farm size increases, the production of diverse nutrients and viable, multifunctional, sustainable landscapes requires efforts to maintain production diversity, which may lead to increased dietary diversity (Pellegrini and Tasciotti 2014). Targeted policies that focus on the farmer may incentivise positive changes in landscapes, production diversity and dietary diversity.
In turn, diversification in the food system (e.g., implementation of agro-ecological production systems, broad-based genetic resources, combined with balanced diets) can enhance adaptation to increased climate variability under climate change (IPCC 2019). Diversified agro-ecological systems can play a role in meeting health and nutrition goals while also reducing environment-related health risks caused by conventional agriculture through water and air pollution, and more specifically, by pesticides, antibiotics and inorganic fertilisers (Frison and Clément 2020). Compared to conventional agriculture, organic agriculture generally has a positive effect on a range of environmental factors, including above and belowground biodiversity, soil carbon stocks and soil quality and conservation, but it has weaknesses in terms of lower productivity and reduced yield stability (Knapp and van der Heijden 2018).
Sustainable land management can bridge yield gaps and avoid deforestation while providing climate change adaptation and mitigation and land degradation co-benefits in croplands and pastures (Smith et al. 2020). This can be achieved through increased organic carbon in soil (Soussana et al. 2019), agroforestry, erosion and fire control, improved irrigation water and fertiliser management, and heat- and drought-tolerant plants (Smith et al. 2020). For livestock, sustainable options include better grazing land management, improved manure management, higher-quality feed, and use of breeds and genetic improvement (Herrero et al. 2016). Under stringent global climate change mitigation policy, risks to food security would be increased (Hasegawa et al. 2018) through competition among those seeking land use for, respectively, food production, bioenergy and afforestation, be it driven by local or foreign investment in land (Cotula et al. 2014). Nevertheless, increasing and valuing soil carbon sequestration on agricultural land would allow for the reduction of these negative impacts by approximately two-thirds (Frank et al. 2017). The large-scale deployment of bioenergy options such as afforestation, energy crops, carbon capture and storage has adverse effects on food security, but small scale projects with best practices may deliver co-benefits (Smith et al. 2020).
Increased demand for fish and seafood has threatened fisheries and the sustainability of ocean resources. Limited attention has been given to fish as a key element in food security and nutrition (HLPE 2014). The aquaculture industry has emerged and increasingly fills the seafood supply gap to meet growing demand. Overfishing and relatively high waste (often due to catching under-sized fish) pose environmental and biodiversity challenges, threatening the long-term sustainability of fishery resources (HLPE 2014). Additional challenges in production facilities such as marine feed supply, antibiotic use and waste recycling need to be overcome to further develop aquaculture (Belton et al. 2020). The impacts of activities such as oil drilling, energy installations, coastal development and the construction of ports and other coastal infrastructures, dams and water flow management (especially for inland fisheries) affect aquatic productivity. The impact of these activities on the habitats that sustain resources (e.g., erosion and pollution) and the livelihoods of fishing communities – such as the denial of access to fishing grounds or displacement from coastal settlements – need to be carefully balanced with the growing demand for resources (HLPE 2014).
Ensuring that food prices reflect real costs, including major externalities caused by climate change, land and water resource degradation and biodiversity loss, is necessary in order to address artificial price distortions, reduce food waste, internalise the costs of externalities (including the public health impacts) and, at the same time, ensure decent incomes and wages for farmers and food system workers. However, a true calculation of food costs would, on average, increase food prices. Food assistance policies that do not distort market and labour incentives can meet emergency food needs and improve access to food. Trade can help to improve food availability, diversify diets and smooth price volatility (MacDonald et al. 2015).
5.4 Harnessing Science and Innovation and Managing Risks
Structural transformation to a more sustainable food system can bring about efficient and more rapid productivity growth through investment in research and development over the long term (Fuglie et al. 2020). Science should increasingly inform solutions and generate knowledge that is actionable for transforming food systems and achieving safe and nutritious food for all (Arnott et al. 2020). Since policy agendas are largely set at national and local scales, the translation of global-scale scientific assessments into actionable knowledge at national and local scales is needed.
New and emerging technologies appropriate for health, climate change adaptation and mitigation, and disaster preparedness could be game-changers for overcoming challenges and building system resilience. Nonetheless, their development should be guided by an assessment of their socio-economic, ethical and environmental impacts. Evidence-based assessment is needed of the risks and benefits associated with new technologies. Research is also needed to understand the diffusion modes of traditional knowledge and social innovations for supporting the conservation of common goods in more participatory, collaborative, inclusive and equitable ways.
Advances in science and technology such as genome editing (Khatodia et al. 2016), precision agriculture and digital agriculture (Basso and Antle 2020), agroecology (Caquet et al. 2020), vertical farming, alternative protein sources (e.g., algae, insects), active packaging and blockchain technologies (Kamilaris et al. 2019), artificial intelligence and big data analysis (Wolfert et al. 2017) and whole-genome sequencing in food safety (Deng et al. 2016) have the potential to meet a number of food system challenges. However, adapting these technologies to local conditions, making them accessible to farmers and retaining much of the gain among consumers and rural communities is challenging, especially for developing economies, smallholder farmers and small businesses. Therefore, investments in science-based, participatory processes for mapping out realistic and equitable options are needed (Basso and Antle 2020).
The importance of agriculture in producing non-food products (biofuels, chemicals, biomaterials) and in supporting ecosystem services is increasingly recognised within the context of the bioeconomy, which targets an increased reliance on renewable resources to address climate change (Zilberman 2014). A circular bioeconomy envisions developments in industrial biotechnologies to generate co-products, by-products and waste recycling, thereby generating an overall increased input efficiency of agricultural systems that produce bio-based products in diversified agro-ecological landscapes (Therond et al. 2017; Maina et al. 2017).
Global and regional data-sharing systems (including machine learning) based on the FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable data) principles (Mons et al. 2017) can advance food system knowledge and enhance the accountability of all stakeholders within food systems. The use of open-source platforms for data- and code-sharing should be encouraged to stimulate global learning.
Table 1 shows the fragmented nature of data related to this Action Track, with global reports focussing on single elements. National nutrition assessments are costly and infrequently conducted, constraining the monitoring of progress and the impact of interventions at scale. Even where the indicators have been included in the SDG indicator set, current data on foodborne diseases, some malnutrition indicators (such as wasting), poverty and inequality data are not updated or are missing comparative baselines. Very few sex-disaggregated indicators are available, constraining analysis and the tracking of progress towards gender equality. The upcoming Countdown on Food System Transformation mechanism may support the effort to bring together various indicators in a systematic framework for monitoring and evaluation.
Increasingly, risk assessment tools will be needed to drive food safety policy and standards and optimise surveillance, detection and early warning systems of zoonotic diseases for both the formal and informal sectors (Di Marco et al. 2020) and crop diseases (Mohanty et al. 2016). Modernising our food safety and biosecurity risk management systems is an integral part of the food system transformation required to meet food and nutrition security needs. This will require a science- and risk-based approach for production of safe food within a food systems approach.
6 Concluding Messages
Action to address safety, malnutrition, poverty and inequality, as well as climate and environmental issues, through food system transformation will undoubtedly bring large health, social, economic, ecological and development co-benefits and savings for public expenditure while supporting several interrelated SDGs. A range of priority actions to speed up progress towards international targets and scale up the solutions proposed in Sect. 5 can be taken in the short-term, based on existing knowledge, while supporting longer, more sustainable responses with significant co-benefits. Future actions will have to be iterative, coherent, adaptive and flexible to maximise co-benefits and minimise trade-offs. Many recommended policy changes and interventions have win-win potential for food security, health and the environment. However, other choices will have adverse or unintended impacts on the interconnected drivers affecting food systems and their outcomes.
Adopting a whole-system approach in policy, research and monitoring and evaluation is crucial for managing trade-off and externalities from farm-level to national scales and across multiple sectors and agencies. Ultimately, context matters, and comprehensive national action plans are crucial for setting out actions suited to the particular economic, agricultural, social and dietary preferences of the particular nation. Careful consideration of the trade-offs and co-benefits of any actions will be necessary at different levels (sub-national, national, regional and global). Likewise, there may be ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ in each action adopted to transform to more sustainable food systems. The losses and gains will vary depending on the context, but could include a loss of income and livelihoods across the food system, such as would happen with a reduction in the production and consumption of animal-sourced foods or the implementation of seasonal banning of fishing to allow for the regeneration of marine resources. Such shifts could lead to the marginalisation and stigmatisation of people in the food system who have not yet been considered as vulnerable or marginalised.
Including all stakeholders in discussions, policy-making and evaluation processes is essential for the inclusive transformation of food systems at all levels. Strengthening collaboration among research, the private sector and policy-makers is pivotal in creating food environments and guiding consumers’ choices in practical and implementable ways. The elaboration and implantation of the National Food Systems Plans will be essential instruments for bringing the relevant public sectors and diverse stakeholders together.
Adaptive learning and new knowledge must be shared globally in order to accelerate our capacities to meet existing and future challenges. Substantial public, private and international investment is necessary to foster progress towards the targets and recover from the setbacks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Improved international cooperation and coordination of the food system is necessary, including the establishment of a thorough monitoring, evaluation and early warning system with comprehensive indicators, transparency and commitments from all stakeholders. For example, bringing all of the indicators in Table 1 into one annual food system monitoring report would facilitate cooperation among UN agencies. Creating a food system compass could be based on bottom-up pathways developed at the national scale to reach food systems targets supporting an ensemble of global-scale and integrative food system models. Establishing such a system will require capacity development for comprehensive foresight, scenario and predictive modelling to better understand uncertainties, trade-offs and impacts of various change pathways. More research is needed to identify the most adequate, affordable, healthy and sustainable diets across different contexts. More frequently collected nutrition and poverty data are necessary to provide more data points for monitoring change and progress. Innovative indicators such as the affordability of adequate, nutritious and healthy diets are vital for bringing the three elements of safety, nutrition and inequality together.
The costs of acting and not acting on the key drivers of diet and food system change and the impact of these changes and shifts are required for effective decision-making. For example, the cost of nutrition interventions is relatively low per unit compared to the long-term losses in human potential and incomes for poorer people. The cost of NCDs to the health system is significantly higher per unit than that of scalable interventions. Rapid reductions in anthropogenic GHG emissions across all sectors can reduce the negative impacts of climate change on food systems in the long term (similar to land and water restoration).
Research and technology advances are essential for solving critical constraints and offering many opportunities to improve productivity and food safety and reduce food losses and waste, as well as GHG emissions. Capacity-building, property rights, technology development, transfer and deployment and enabling financial mechanisms across the food system can support livelihoods and increase incomes. Greater cooperation regarding trade could overcome constraints and barriers.
Safe and nutritious food for all requires a transformation of food systems, changing both supply and demand of food in differentiated ways across world regions: bridging yield gaps and improving livestock feed conversion, largely through agro-ecological practices and agroforestry, deploying soil carbon sequestration and agricultural greenhouse gas abatement at scale, reducing food loss and waste, as well as addressing over-nourishment and changing the diets of wealthy populations. Global food system sustainability also requires halting the expansion of agriculture into fragile ecosystems while restoring degraded forests, fisheries, rangelands, peatlands and wetlands.
References
Alae-Carew C, Nicoleau S, Bird FA, Hawkins P, Tuomisto HL, Haines A, Dangour A, Scheelbeek FP (2020) The impact of environmental changes on the yield and nutritional quality of fruits, nuts and seeds: a systematic review. Environ Res Lett 15:023002
Alderman H (2016) Leveraging social protection programs for improved nutrition: summary of evidence prepared for the global forum on nutrition-sensitive social protection programs, 2015. World Bank, Washington, DC
Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. Agricultural Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Alroy J (2017) Effects of habitat disturbance on tropical forest biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(23):6056–6061
Arnott JC, Mach KJ, Wong-Parodi G (2020) Editorial overview: the science of actionable knowledge. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 42:A1–A5
Barrera, E. L., Hertel, T. (2020). Global food waste across the income spectrum: Implications for food prices, production and resource use. Food Policy 98C:101874.
Barrows G, Sexton S, Zilberman D (2014) Agricultural biotechnology: the promise and prospects of genetically modified crops. J Econ Perspect 28(1):99–120.
Barthel S, Isendahl C, Vis BN, Drescher A, Evans DL, van Timmeren A (2019) Global urbanization and food production in direct competition for land: leverage places to mitigate impacts on SDG2 and on the earth system. Anthropocene Rev 6(1–2):71–97
Basso B, Antle J (2020) Digital agriculture to design sustainable agricultural systems. Nat Sustain 3(4):254–256
Belton B, Reardon T, Zilberman D (2020) Sustainable commoditization of seafood. Nat Sustain 3:677–684. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0540-7
Bhutta A, Ahmed T, Black RE, Cousens S, Dewey K, Giugliani E et al (2008) What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. Lancet 371(9610):p417–p440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61693-6
Bukhman G, Mocumbi AO, Atun R et al for the Lancet NCDI Poverty Commission Study Group (2020) The lancet NCDI poverty commission: bridging a gap in universal health coverage for the poorest billion. Lancet 396(10256):991–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31907-3
Caquet T, Gascuel C, Tixier-Boichard M (2020) Agroecology: research for the transition of agri-food systems and territories. Quae, Versailles, 96 pp. ISBN: 9782759232949
Chaudhary A, Gustafson D, Mathys A (2018) Multi-indicator sustainability assessment of global food systems. Nat Commun 9(1):1–13
Cherlet M, Hutchinson C, Reynolds J, Hill J, Sommer S, von Maltitz G (eds) (2018) World Atlas of desertification. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
Committee on World Food Security (CFS). (2020) CFS voluntary guidelines on Food Systems for Nutrition (VGFSyN). Draft for negotiations. CFS, Rome. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/cfs/Docs1920/Nutrition_Food_System/CFS_Voluntary_Guidelines_Food_Systems_Nutrition_Draft_for_Negotiations_16Mar.pdf
Committee on World Food Security (CFS) (2021) About the CFS. CFS, Rome. http://www.fao.org/cfs/home/about/en/. Accessed online 14 Mar 2021
Cotula L, Oya C, Codjoe EA, Eid A, Kakraba-Ampeh M, Keeley J, Asare RO (2014) Testing claims about large land deals in Africa: findings from a multi-country study. J Dev Stud 50(7):903–925
Crews TE, Cattani DJ (2018) Strategies, advances, and challenges in breeding perennial grain crops. Sustainability 10(7):1–7
De Schutter O (2013) The reform of the committee on world food security: the quest for coherence in global governance. Centre de philosophie du droit (CRIDHO), working paper 2013/8. Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve
Deng X, den Bakker HC, Hendriksen RS (2016) Genomic epidemiology: whole-genome-sequencing–powered surveillance and outbreak investigation of foodborne bacterial pathogens. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 7:353–374
Devleesschauwer B, Haagsma JA, Mangen MJJ, Lake RJ, Havelaar AH (2018) The global burden of foodborne disease. In: Roberts T (ed) Food safety economics, Food microbiology and food safety. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92138-9_7
Di Marco M, Baker ML, Daszak P, De Barro P, Eskew EA, Godde CM et al (2020) Opinion: sustainable development must account for pandemic risk. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117(8):3888–3892
Donati M, Menozzi D, Zighetti C, Rosi A, Zinetti A, Scazzina F (2016) Towards a sustainable diet combining economic, environmental and nutritional objectives. Appetite 106:48–57
Drewnowski A (2005) Concept of a nutritious food: toward a nutrient density score. Am J Clin Nutr 82:721–732
Fanzo J (2019) Healthy and sustainable diets and food systems: the key to achieving sustainable development goal 2? Food Ethics 4:159–174
FAO (2011) Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention. FAO, Rome
FAO (2018) The future of food and agriculture – alternative pathways to 2050. FAO, Rome
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO (2017) The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2017. FAO, Rome
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO (2020) The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. FAO, Rome
Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M et al (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478(7369):337–342
Fore H, Dongyu Q, Beasley D, Ghebreyesus T (2020) Child malnutrition and COVID-19: the time to act is now. Lancet 396(10250):517–518
Frank S, Havlík P, Soussana JF, Levesque A, Valin H, Wollenberg E et al (2017) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security. Environ Res Lett 12(10):105004
Frison E, Clément C (2020) The potential of diversified agroecological systems to deliver healthy outcomes: making the link between agriculture, food systems & health. Food Policy 96C:101851
FSIN (Food Security Information Network) (2020) 2020 global report on food crises: joint analysis for better decisions. FSIN, Rome
Fuglie K, Gautam M, Goyal A, Maloney WF (2020) Harvesting prosperity: technology and productivity growth in agriculture. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/32350
GAIN (Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition) (2017) What constitutes a nutritious and safe food? GAIN, Geneva. Available from: https://www.gainhealth.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/gain-nutritious-food-definition.pdf
Gaupp F, Hall J, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Dadson S (2020) Changing risks of simultaneous global breadbasket failure. Nat Clim Chang 10(1):54–57
Gerten D, Heck V, Jägermeyr J, Bodirsky BL, Fetzer I, Jalava M et al (2020) Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries. Nat Sustain 3(3):200–208
Gillespie S, van den Bold M (2017) Agriculture, food systems, and nutrition: meeting the challenge. Global Chall 1(3):1600002
Glover JD, Reganold JP, Bell LW, Borevitz J, Brummer EC, Buckler ES, Cox CM et al (2020) Increased food and ecosystem security via perennial grains. Science 328(5986):1638–1639
GNR (Global Nutrition Report) (2020) 2020 global nutrition report: action on equity to end malnutrition. Development Initiatives, Bristol
Gosling SN, Arnell NW (2016) A global assessment of the impact of climate change on water scarcity. Clim Chang 134(3):371–385
Hasegawa T, Fujimori S, Havlík P, Valin H, Bodirsky BL, Doelman JC et al (2018) Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy. Nat Clim Chang 8(8):699–703
Hawkes C, Ruel MT, Salm L, Sinclaire B, Branca F (2019) Double-duty actions: seizing programme and policy opportunities to address malnutrition in all its forms. Lancet 395(10218):142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32506-1
Headey D, Alderman H (2019) The relative caloric prices of healthy and unhealthy foods differ systematically across income levels and continents. J Nutr 149(11):2022–2033
Headey D, Heidkamp R, Osendorp S, Ruel M, Scott N, Flory A et al (2020) Impacts of COVID-19 on childhood malnutrition and nutrition-related mortality. Lancet 396:519–521
Herrero M, Henderson B, Havlík P, Thornton PK, Conant RT, Smith P, Wirsenius S, Hristov AN, Gerber P, Gill M (2016) Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. Nat Clim Chang 6(5):452–461
Herrero M, Thornton PK, Power B, Bogard JR, Remans R, Fritz S et al (2017) Farming and the geography of nutrient production for human use: a transdisciplinary analysis. Lancet Planet Health 1(1):e33–e42
Herrero M, Hugas M, Lele U, Wira M, Torero M (2021) Shift to healthy and sustainable consumption patterns. A paper from the scientific group of the UN food systems summit. UN, New York
HLPE (2014) Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture for food security and nutrition. A report by the high level panel of experts on food security and nutrition of the committee on world food security, Rome
HLPE (2020) Food security and nutrition: building a global narrative towards 2030. HLPE, Rome
Hodson E, Niggli U, Kaoru K, Lal R, Sadoff C (2021) Boost nature positive production at sufficient scale – a paper on action track 3. A paper from the Scientific Group of the UN Food Systems Summit. UN, New York
INFOSAN (2019) INFOSAN activity report 2018–2019. World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2020. Geneva. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240006928
IPCC (2019) Climate change and land, an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. IPCC. www.ipcc.ch/report/srcc
Jaffee S, Henson S, Unnevehr L, Grace D, Cassou E (2019) The safe food imperative: accelerating progress in low- and middle-income countries. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the World Bank, Washington, DC. Accessed 4 Feb 2020. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/30568
Janssens C, Havlík P, Krisztin T, Baker J, Frank S, Hasegawa T et al (2020) Global hunger and climate change adaptation through international trade. Nat Clim Chang 10:829–835
Jarmul S, Dangour AD, Green R, Liew Z, Haines A, Scheelbeek P (2020) Climate change mitigation through dietary change: a systematic review of empirical and modelling studies on the environmental footprints and health effects of ‘sustainable diets’. Environ Res Lett 15(2020):123014
Kamilaris A, Fonts A, Prenafeta-Boldύ FX (2019) The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains. Trends Food Sci Technol 91:640–652
Katz DL, Doughty K, Njike V, Treu JA, Reynolds J, Walker J, Smith E, Katz C (2011) A cost comparison of more and less nutritious food choices in US supermarkets. Public Health Nutr 14(9):1693–1699
Khanna M, Zilberman D (2012) Modeling the land-use and greenhouse-gas implications of biofuels. Clim Change Econ 3(03):1250016
Khatodia S, Bhatotia K, Passricha N, Khurana SMP, Tuteja N (2016) The CRISPR/Cas genome-editing tool: application in improvement of crops. Front Plant Sci 7:506
Khoury CK, Bjorkman AD, Dempewolf H, Ramirez-Villegas J, Guarino L, Jarvis A et al (2014) Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(11):4001–4006
Knapp S, van der Heijden MG (2018) A global meta-analysis of yield stability in organic and conservation agriculture. Nat Commun 9(1):1–9
Kummu M, de Moel H, Porkka M, Siebert S, Varis O, Ward PJ (2012) Lost food, wasted resources: global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Sci Total Environ 438:477–489
Laborde D, Martin W, Swinnen J, Vos R (2020) COVID-19 risks to global food security. Science 369(6503):500–502
Lawrence D, Vandecar K (2015) Effects of tropical deforestation on climate and agriculture. Nat Clim Chang 5(1):27–36
Lowder SK, Skoet J, Raney T (2016) The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide. World Dev 87:16–29
Lutz W, Samir KC (2011) Global human capital: integrating education and population. Science 333(6042):587–592
MacDonald GK, Brauman KA, Sun S, Carlson KM, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, West PC (2015) Rethinking agricultural trade relationships in an era of globalization. BioScience 65(3):275–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu225
Maina S, Kachrimanidou V, Koutinas A (2017) A roadmap towards a circular and sustainable bioeconomy through waste valorization. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 8:18–23
Manners R, van Etten J (2018) Are agricultural researchers working on the right crops to enable food and nutrition security under future climates? Glob Environ Chang 53:182–194
Martorell R (2017) Improved nutrition in the first 1000 days and adult human capital and health. Am J Hum Biol 29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22952
Masters WA, Bai Y, Herforth A, Sarpong DB, Mishili F, Kinabo J, Coates JC (2018) Measuring the affordability of nutritious diets in Africa: price indexes for diet diversity and the cost of nutrient adequacy. Am J Agric Econ 100(5):1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay059
Mohanty SP, Hughes DP, Salathé M (2016) Using deep learning for image-based plant disease detection. Front Plant Sci 7:1419
Mons B, Neylon C, Velterop J, Dumontier M, da Silva Santos LOB, Wilkinson MD (2017) Cloudy, increasingly FAIR: revisiting the FAIR data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud. Inf Serv Use 37(1):49–56
Mottet A, de Haan C, Falcucci A, Tempio G, Opio C, Gerber P (2017) Livestock: on our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate. Glob Food Sec 14:1–8
Neufeld L, Hendriks SL, Hugas M (2021) Healthy diet: a definition for the United Nations Food systems summit 2021. A paper from the scientific group of the UN food systems summit. UN, New York
Pellegrini L, Tasciotti L (2014) Crop diversification, dietary diversity and agricultural income: empirical evidence from eight developing countries. Can J Dev Stud 35(2):211–227
Perignon M, Vieux F, Soler L, Masset G, Darmon N (2017) Improving diet sustainability through evolution of food choices: review of epidemiological studies on the environmental impact of diets. Nutr Rev 75(1):2–17
Pretty J, Benton TG, Bharucha ZP, Dicks LV, Flora CB, Godfray HC et al (2018) Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification. Nat Sustain 1(8):441–446
Quisumbing A, Meinzen-Dick R, Behrman J, Basset J (2011) Gender and the global food-price crisis. Dev Pract 21(4–5):488–492
Rosa L, Chiarelli DD, Tu C, Rulli MC, D’Odorico P (2019) Global unsustainable virtual water flows in agricultural trade. Environ Res Lett 14(11):114001
Ruel MT, Quisumbing AR, Balagamwala M (2018) Nutrition-sensitive agriculture: what have we learned so far? Glob Food Sec 17:128–153
Samir KC, Lutz W (2017) The human core of the shared socio-economic pathways: population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Glob Environ Chang 42:181–192
Scheelbeek P, Bird FA, Tuomisto HL, Green R, Harris FB, Joy E, Chalabi Z, Allen E, Haines A, Dangour AD (2018) Effect of environmental changes on vegetable and legume yields and nutritional quality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115(26):6804–6809. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800442115
Schmidt-Traub G, Obersteiner M, Mosnier A (2019) Fix the broken food system in three steps. Naturecom (comment) 569(7755):181–183
Searchinger T, Waite R, Hanson C, Ranganathan J (2018) Creating a sustainable food future: a menu of solutions to feed nearly 10 billion people by 2050: a synthesis report. World Bank, Washington, DC
Shafiee-Jood M, Cai X (2016) Reducing food loss and waste to enhance food security and environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Technol 50(16):8432–8443. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01993
Smith P, Calvin K, Nkem J, Campbell D, Cherubini F, Grassi G et al (2020) Which practices codeliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification? Glob Chang Biol 26(3):1532–1575
Soussana JF, Lutfalla S, Ehrhardt F, Rosenstock T, Lamanna C, Havlík P et al (2019) Matching policy and science: rationale for the ‘4 per 1000-soils for food security and climate’ initiative. Soil Tillage Res 188:3–15
Springmann M, Clark M, Mason-D’Croz D, Wiebe K, Bodirsky BL, Lassaletta L et al (2018) Smarter metrics will help fix our food system. Nature 558(7708):7–8
Sukhdev P (2018) Smarter metrics will help fix our food system. Nature 558(7708):7–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05328-1
Tadele Z (2019) Orphan crops: their importance and the urgency of improvement. Planta 250:677–694
Therond O, Duru M, Roger-Estrade J, Richard G (2017) A new analytical framework of farming system and agriculture model diversities. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 37(3):21
UN United Nations (2021) Sustainable development goal 1: end poverty in all its forms everywhere. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/poverty/. Accessed 6 Mar 2021
UNDESA United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019) World population prospects 2019: highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/423)
UNICEF, WHO, the World Bank (2020) Levels and trends in child malnutrition: UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Group joint child malnutrition estimates. UNICEF/WHO/The World Bank, Geneva/Washington, DC
Valin H, Sands RD, Van der Mensbrugghe D, Nelson GC, Ahammad H, Blanc E et al (2014) The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models. Agric Econ 45(1):51–67
van Vliet J, Eitelberg DA, Verburg PH (2017) A global analysis of land take in cropland areas and production displacement from urbanisation. Glob Environ Chang 43:107–115
Von Braun J, Afsana K, Fresco L, Hassan M, Torero M (2021) Food systems – definition, concept and application for the UN food systems summit. A paper from the scientific group of the UN food systems summit. UN, New York
Watts N, Amann M, Arnell N, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Beagley J, Belesova K et al (2021) The 2020 report of the lancet countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises. Lancet 397(10269):129–170
WFP (2017) World food assistance report 2017: taking stock and looking ahead. WFP, Rome
WFP (2020) COVID-19 will double number of people facing food crises unless swift action is taken. Retrieved from https://www.wfp.org/news/covid-19-will-doublenumber-people-facing-food-crises-unless-swift-action-taken
WHO (2013) Advancing food safety initiatives: strategic plan for food safety including foodborne zoonoses 2013–2022. World Health Organization, Geneva. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/101542/9789241506281_eng.pdf;jsessionid=2CA0920F1CE46F365F5C65D9664C0A94?sequence=1
WHO (2015a) WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: foodborne disease burden. WHO, Geneva
WHO (2015b) World report on aging and health. WHO, Geneva
WHO (2020) Dietary recommendations: nutritional requirements; establishing human nutrient requirements for worldwide application. WHO, Geneva. https://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/nutrecomm/en/
WHO, UNICEF (2017) The extension of the 2025 maternal, infant and young child nutrition targets to 2030. Discussion paper. WHO/UNICEF, Geneva/New York
Wolfert S, Ge L, Verdouw C, Bogaardt MJ (2017) Big data in smart farming–a review. Agric Syst 153:69–80
World Bank (2018) Poverty and shared prosperity 2018: piecing together the poverty puzzle. World Bank, Washington, DC
World Food Programme (2020) COVID-19 will double number of people facing food crises unless swift action is taken. https://www.wfp.org/news/covid-19-will-double-number-people-facing-food-crises-unless-swift-action-taken
Wossen T, Abdoulaye T, Alene A, Haile MG, Feleke S, Olanrewaju A, Manyong V (2017) Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare. J Rural Stud 54:223–233
Xue L, Liu G, Parfitt J et al (2017) Missing food, missing data? A critical review of global food losses and food waste data. Environ Sci Technol 51(12):6618–6633. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00401
Zilberman D (2014) Fellows address: the economics of sustainable development. Am J Agric Econ 96(2):385–396
Zilberman D, Lu L, Reardon T (2019) Innovation-induced food supply chain design. Food Policy 83:289–297
Zuccala E, Horton R (2020) Reframing the NCD agenda: a matter of justice and equity. Lancet 396(10256):939–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31910-3
Acknowledgements
Helpful comments on an earlier draft by five external peer reviewers and by colleagues in the Scientific Group are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hendriks, S., Soussana, JF., Cole, M., Kambugu, A., Zilberman, D. (2023). Ensuring Access to Safe and Nutritious Food for All Through the Transformation of Food Systems. In: von Braun, J., Afsana, K., Fresco, L.O., Hassan, M.H.A. (eds) Science and Innovations for Food Systems Transformation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15703-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15703-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15702-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15703-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)