Abstract
Soil material undergoes a volumetric change when deformed, and the change continues until the material reaches its critical state. In granular soils, the critical state is one that exhibits the least frictional resistance, but in clayey materials, the frictional resistance decreases further upon shearing due to particle reorientation in the plane of failure, and the material volume attains a stable or steady state only after a large amount of shear deformation, which depending on the material type varies from a few to tens of centimeters. This state of shear deformation is generally known as the residual state. This article focuses on residual-state creep shear tests on common clayey materials for the purpose of experimentally simulating the landslide creep and understanding the displacement behavior of large-scale creeping landslides. As a general understanding, the deep-seated creeping landslides displace as a result of residual-state shearing of clayey material in the slip surface. So, a modified bishop-type torsional ring shear machine was developed for studying the residual-state shear creep behavior of clayey soils. In the ring shear tests, the material is first sheared under a strain-controlled pattern, and after the sample reaches its residual state of shear, different sets of constant shear loads are applied until the sample fails again and again. The test results reveal that at the residual state of shear, the creep behavior is exhibited only after a load equivalent to the residual frictional resistance of the material is applied. Moreover, it was understood that the displacement required for the beginning of the tertiary stage of creep of particular soil material, i.e., the early stage of creep failure is the same for all sets of creep loads.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Large-scale creeping landslides often refer to massive mass movements that slide down the mountain slopes at a creeping rate of displacement, ranging from a few to tens of centimeters a year. Depending on the geohydrological conditions, the displacement rate fluctuates, but in many cases, it is found to be only a few centimeters a year. Such a slow rate of land sliding is often also referred to as creeping displacement, and the soil material in the slip surface of such landslides is often found to be clayey, which is generally found and considered to be in its residual state of shear due to continuous landslide displacement for a long time.
Even when the geohydrological conditions do not change, the landslide activity continues under the influence of gravitational force-produced shear component along the shear surface that can be considered almost equal to the amount of shear resistance produced along the shear surface, i.e., a condition of limit state failure. However, Patton (1984) describes that such landslides keep moving even when the slip surface shear resistance is slightly greater than the driving shear forces. If we consider that the stress conditions on the slip surface material do not change for a certain duration but the landslide is in constant downslope movement, we can compare this situation with creep phenomenon, which basically is time-dependent rise in strain under a constant applied stress. So, it is considered that the large-scale landslide displacement behavior can be understood through shear creep tests on clayey materials. However, due to already occurred large shear deformation (or displacement), the shear resistance along the slip surface cannot be treated as that of an only slightly sheared soil material. So, use of a ring shear machine has been in practice for the last several decades, especially when evaluating landslides and large deformation ground problems. The ring shear machine can shear an annular soil specimen for nearly infinite amount of shear deformation and helps to measure peak and residual shear resistances of a clayey soil material.
In general, the shear strength of a soil is defined as its maximum resistance to applied shear force (Skempton 1964; 1985; Bishop et al. 1971; Lupini et al. 1981, Giba and Egashira 1992; Gibo 1994; Nakamura et al. 2010). When a soil is sheared, the developed shear resistance first reaches a peak value at a comparatively short time or less deformation. During this process, the soil material undergoes volume change due to vertical movement of soil particles and depending on the outward (known as dilation) or inward (known as contraction) movement of the particles, the developed peak shear resistance is high or low. The peak shear resistance, especially for overconsolidated or dense materials, is attained when the rate of outward vertical movement (i.e., dilation) of soil particles is maximum. Immediately after the peak value, upon further shearing, the shear resistance drops gradually until fully softened shear resistance is achieved, which is generally known as critical state (refer to Fig. 1). Shearing beyond the critical state may result in slight volume change (normally contraction), which is basically due to reorientation of clayey particles in the shear zone, but after the reorientation process is over, no further volume change is theoretically supposed to take place, and the frictional resistance exhibited remains constant. This very state is referred to as residual state of shear for clayey soil materials (Skempton 1964, 1985; Lupini et al. 1981).
So far, most creep tests on soil materials have employed a triaxial compression cell or an oedometer (such as Ter-Stepanian 1963; Yen 1969; Waker 1969; Campanella and Vaid 1974; Nelson and Thompson 1977; Patton 1984; Feda 1989; Picarelli et al. 2001; Picarelli et al. 2004; Augustesen et al. 2004; Leoni et al. 2008; Yin et al. 2010; Brandes and Nakayama 2010, etc.), but these methods largely differ from the state of shear explained above, i.e., creep shear behavior of the slip surface material or the landslide creep, which may be ideally defined as a time-dependent slow displacement under no change in driving forces or stresses and can be represented by creep displacement curves shown in Fig. 2.
At residual state of shear, a clay material is supposed to have zero to negligible cohesion and no effect of dilation or contraction. What helps the slip surface material at this state develop shear resistance is the true inter-particle frictional force generated amongst the soil particles. So, the existing creep test methods do not truly help understand the mechanism of creeping landslide displacement. So, for this study, an existing torsional ring shear machine was modified to make it also capable of measuring residual-state creep displacement under any amount of applied constant shear stresses. A special care was taken not to let the residual-state slip surface material undergo strength recovery due to period of shear stagnation while changing from ordinary shear to creep shear. So, in this article, the focus mainly goes onto introducing the residual-state creep shear test method for the experimental simulation of landslide creep, understanding the residual-state creep displacement behavior of different types of clayey materials, and linking the findings of this experimental study with the creeping type landslide displacement behavior.
2 Material and Method
2.1 Modified Ring Shear Machine
A torsional ring shear machine (Bishop et al. 1971) was used in this study after a few special modifications. The annular specimen container of the ring shear machine measures 8 cm inner diameter and 12 cm outer diameter with a total depth of 3.2 cm. To perform the residual-state creep tests, the ring shear machine was modified based on the transitional change of the strain-controlled motor-driven shear into creep load shearing without completely releasing the applied shear stress, which is capable of measuring the creep displacement with respect to time under the application of a constant creep load, as shown in Fig. 3. The lower part of the ring shear machine has been designed to allow the applied creep load to act directly on the slip surface of the test specimen, and the displacement or deformation due to the creep load can be recorded in the displacement recorder unit. The deformation of the specimen with respect to time and the corresponding changes in the volume of the specimen, if any, during the creep tests can be recorded automatically. The testing process involves strained-controlled shearing, confirmation of residual state, application of various creep shear stresses (or stress-controlled shearing) and recording of time-displacement histories.
2.2 Test Materials
Landslide slip surface materials generally are clayey soils composed of common clay minerals such as smectite, chlorite, and illite. These minerals generally have very high specific surface area, higher cation exchange capacity, and greater affinity to water. For this reason, large-scale creeping landslides have been extensively studied from clay mineralogical perspective and are often interpreted as a long-term geomorphological process influenced significantly by mineralogical changes (e.g., Yatabe et al. 1991; 2007, Torii et al. 2006). So, in this study, all tests were conducted using commercially available kaolin clay, Toyoura sand powder finer than 75 µm, and their mixtures with commercially available Na-bentonite powder (with about 50% smectite content) in different desired proportions. The mix proportion of Na-bentonite in kaolin and the sand powder was 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25% by weight. The main purpose of increasing the amount of Na-bentonite in the test samples was to achieve decreasing residual strength or residual friction angle (ϕr) of the test samples. The physical properties and ring shear results of the tested mix samples are presented in Table 1. In the ‘sample name’ column, SP refers to sand powder, K refers to kaolin powder, B refers to bentonite powder, and the figures after these notation letters refer to the percentage of the material mixed in that test sample. For example, SP100 refers to 100% sand powder, K100 refers to 100% kaolin while SP95+B5 refers to 95% sand powder and 5% bentonite, K75+B25 refers to 75% kaolin and 25% bentonite.
2.3 Experimental Program
In the residual-state shear creep tests, two main steps were followed: (1) ordinary ring shear tests and (2) residual-state shear creep tests. The ordinary ring shear tests were conducted to achieve the soil materials residual state of shear. This state was confirmed when the shearing had reached a state of constant values for the load-cell reading and dial gauge reading after about 10 cm of shear displacement. In the residual-state shear creep tests, the first creep load was calculated on the basis that the applied shear stress was 90% of the residual-state shear resistance, which is referred in this study as ‘Residual-state Creep Stress Ratio’ and is denoted by RRCS. A 90% residual-state creep stress ratio is denoted by RRCS = 0.9. Then, the material specimen was left under creep loading for several hours and displacement was recorded with the passage of time. After one set of creep test was considered or observed to have been over, the creep load was increased in subsequent steps and time-displacement histories were recorded. The overall experimental flow of the residual-state shear creep tests is shown in Fig. 4. The applied RRCS values in case of all tested samples varied from 0.9000 to 1.0300 in a step of 0.005.
All material samples were prepared for the tests by first uniformly mixing them with appropriate amount of distilled water and then deairing for complete saturation. The deaired liquid samples were then poured into the specimen maker and consolidated under a pressure of 98.1 kN/m2 until the primary consolidation was confirmed to be over. Then, the specimen was transferred into the ring shear machine’s sample container and consolidated again under a pressure of 196.2 kN/m2. However, to avoid unwanted machine friction due to high normal pressure, all shear tests were conducted under a normal pressure of 98.1 kN/m2 (with an overconsolidation ratio of 2.0). The shearing condition was confirmed to be fully drained by allowing sufficient time to dissipate excess pore water pressure, for which the average rate of displacement through the slip surface was set at 0.15 mm/min. At first, strain-controlled shearing was conducted until the residual state of shearing was achieved and residual strength was obtained. Then, the strain-controlled shearing was stopped for about 10 min, and preparations for the creep test were made.
To avoid confusions and discrepancies due to unknown parameters, some important assumptions were made in this study, which are as follows:
-
At the residual-state of shear, there is no influence of further displacement on the shear resistance of the slip surface soil.
-
The amount of recovered shear strength, if any, due to reduction in the rate of shear (e.g., Bhat and Yatabe 2015; Scaringi et al. 2018) or due to the state of no shear is negligible.
-
The effect on the shear resistance due to lack of uniformity in sample preparation, if any, effective stress application accuracy, etc. is negligible.
-
The change in the shear behavior due to changes in the value of the RRCS, if any, is negligible.
-
There is no influence of any amount of displacement in the amount of shear resistance if the sheared material has already reached its residual state
3 Results and Discussion
Creep deformation in soil materials is often explained in three stages, as also illustrated in Fig. 2. In the beginning, the deformation increases rapidly but slows down to a certain value; this stage is known as primary creep. Then, the rate of deformation becomes constant; this is known as secondary creep. Finally, the deformation rate starts to increase exponentially leading to complete failure; this stage is known as tertiary creep. So, in this study, the test results are basically summarized in three stages of creep.
Of the residual-state shear creep test results of total 12 clayey material samples (refer to Table 1), four representative test results for the K100, SP100, K75+B25, and SP75+B25 samples are presented respectively in Figs. 5, 6, 7 and 8, and the basic parameters obtained from the test results in Figs. are summarized respectively in Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5. Owing to the space constraint, the test results for the other eight samples are not presented but all those results are used in interpreting the residual-state creep failure behavior in subsequent discussion. As indicated in the above figures and tables, t1 refers to the elapsed time up to the end of primary creep (or beginning of the secondary creep), δ1 refers to the amount of displacement corresponding to t1, tf refers to the time when secondary creep ends and tertiary creep begins (i.e., final stage of creep failure), and δc refers to the amount of displacement corresponding to tf.
Particularly in the figures above, it is evident that for all cases of RRCS, the amounts of displacement at the time of failure, i.e., at the beginning of the tertiary creep, are more or less the same (also refer to Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5). It indicates that regardless of the amount of applied creep stress, the soil material in its residual state of shear fails only after a certain amount of displacement is achieved. So, in this study, this typical amount of displacement is named as ‘critical displacement’ and is denoted by δc. In case of the K100 sample (Fig. 5), an averaged critical displacement is around 1.758 mm. Likewise, it is 1.414 mm for SP100 sample (Fig. 6), 4.014 mm for K75+B25 sample (Fig. 7), and 2.89 mm for SP75+B25 sample (Fig. 8).
Although the test results of other eight samples are not presented, the critical displacements for the SP95 +B5, K95+B5, SP90+B10, K90+B10, SP85+ B15, SP80+B20, K85+ B15, and K80 +B20 samples were estimated to be 1.925 mm, 1.974 mm, 2.104 mm, 2.250 mm, 2.363 mm, 2.653 mm, 2.783 mm, and 3.136 mm, respectively. All these values of critical displacement are plotted against the values of angle of residual friction (ϕr) (as presented in Table 1) in Fig. 9. Except for a few points, the trend of decrease in critical displacement with increased angle of residual friction is quite linear. This trend clearly reveals that the critical displacement is inversely proportional to residual friction characteristic of a clay material.
The concept of critical displacement may be understood further through coefficient of friction. Basically, any material exhibits two types of frictional behaviors as governed by coefficient of static friction µs (i.e., frictional resistance in rest) and coefficient of kinematic friction µk (i.e., frictional resistance while in motion). The coefficient of static friction is usually greater than the coefficient of kinematic friction, which means a stationary object always needs a greater force to move than to keep it in motion. In a soil material too, the initial force required shear it is always greater than the force required to keep it shearing. So, in this case too, in the beginning the coefficient of static friction (µs) governs the displacement, e.g., in primary and secondary stages of creep, but as soon as the displacement reaches its critical value, the coefficient of kinematic friction (µk) comes into scene to govern the frictional behavior, which leads to accelerated displacement and thereby to complete failure. So, the amount of displacement required for transitional change of µs to µk is understood as critical displacement in this study.
The test results also reveal that creep deformation for RRCS values equal to or below 1.0 does not progress to secondary and tertiary stages (e.g., first three test cases in Fig. 5), which means regardless of the length of time, the clay material does not fail in creep. However, as soon as the RRCS value gets greater than 1.0, the creep failure does take place, and the trend is greater the RRCS value, shorter the time up to failure. Moreover, amongst the tested samples, RRCS = 1.03 was found to be the upper limiting value revealing any greater value would result in instantaneous failure. This more or less indicates that creep failure in residual state of shear of clayey materials is exhibited from a shear loading equivalent to residual shear resistance to an increase in shear loading by 3% of the residual shear resistance.
Furthermore, variation of failure time (tf) with residual-state creep stress ratio (RRCS) for all tested samples is shown in Fig. 10. It is more than clear from this figure that the failure time (tf) is a function of residual-state creep stress ratio (RRCS) and residual friction angle (ϕr). For a particular sample, there is a fine trend of curvilinear decrease in logarithmic time of failure (i.e., log(tf)) with the increase in residual-state creep stress ratio (RRCS), while tf is seen to get longer with a greater angle of residual friction (ϕr). This tri-parametric relationship between failure time (tf), residual-state creep stress ratio (RRCS), and angle of residual friction (ϕr) can be well considered an important basis for predicting residual-state creep failure of clayey materials. Moreover, establishment of a numerical relationship between these three parameters is considered to help predict creeping landslide displacements. For example, if a landslide can be precisely assessed to give representative angle of residual friction of the slip layer clay and state of shear stress application, the time required up to complete sliding can be very well estimated.
4 Concluding Remarks
Application of creep deformation theory in predicting deep-seated landslide failures has been a topic of interest to landslide researchers for a long time. However, most of the work done so far is focused on understanding creep failure behavior of soil materials within the range from strain hardening to strain softening, which does not adequately explain the creep failure mechanism of clayey materials that have already reached a state of residual friction, such as in large-scale creeping landslides. In this study, a modified ring shear machine was used to conduct ordinary ring shear tests and residual-state creep shear tests. Altogether 12 lab-prepared clay samples were used in the test sets, and the recorded time-displacement data series were interpreted to understand the residual-state creep deformation behavior of clayey materials. One of the most important understandings is when RRCS ≤ 1.0, no clay material exhibits creep failure in the state of residual shear, but it takes place only when RRCS > 1. In addition, the amount of displacement required for tertiary creep to begin in a particular clay material was found to be the same regardless of the amount of creep load applied. This amount of displacement (i.e., critical displacement) is inversely related with the residual shear strength (or the angle of residual friction) of clay materials. Furthermore, the time until complete failure or the failure time (tf) is a function of residual-state creep stress ratio (RRCS) and angle of residual friction (ϕr). Finally, a numerical relationship between these three parameters needs to be established for predicting landslide creep displacement and failure.
References
Augustesen A, Liingaard M, Lade PV (2004) Evaluation of Time-Dependent Behavior of Soils. Int J Geomech ASCE 30(3):137–156
Bhat DR, Yatabe R (2015) Effect of shearing rate on residual strength of landslide soils. In: Lollino G et al (Eds) Engineering geology for society and territory 2. Springer, Cham, pp 1211–1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_212
Bishop AW, Green E, Garge VK, Andresen A, Brown JD (1971) A new ring shear apparatus and its application to the measurement of residual strength. Geotechnique 21(4):273–328
Brandes HG, Nakayama DD (2010) Creep, strength and other characteristics of Hawaiian volcanic soils. Geotechnique 60(4):235–245
Campanella RG, Vaid YP (1974) Triaxial and plane strain creep rupture of an undisturbed clay. Can Geotech J 11(1):1–10
Feda J (1989) Interpretation of creep of soil by rate process theory. Geotechnique 39(4):667–677
Gibo S, Egashira K (1992) Relation between reorientation of clay particles and the residual strength of mudstone of the Shimajiri group. Trans Jpn Soc Irrig Drain Reclam Eng 161:19–24 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Gibo S (1994) Ring shear apparatus in measuring residual strength and its measurement accuracy. J Jpn Landslide Soc 31(3):24–30 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Leoni M, Karstunen M, Vermeer PA (2008) Anisotropic creep model for soft soils. Geotechnique 58(3):215–226
Lupini JF, Skinner AE, Vaughan PR (1981) The drained residual strength of cohesive soils. Geotechnique 31(2):181–213
Nakamura S, Gibo S, Egashira K, Kimura S (2010) Platy layer silicate minerals for controlling residual strength in landslide soils of different origins and geology. Geology 38(8):743–746
Nelson JD, Thompson EG (1977) A theory of creep failure in over consolidated clay. J Geotech Eng Proc Am Soc Civil Eng 103:1281–1293
Patton FD (1984) Groundwater pressure and stability analyses of landslides. In: Proceedings of IV international symposium on landslides, vol 3, pp 43–60
Picarelli L, Urciuoli G, Russo C (2001) Effect of groundwater regime on the behavior of clayey slopes. Can Geotech J 41:1995–2004
Picarelli L, Urciuoli G, Russo C (2004) Effect of groundwater regime on the behaviour of clayey slopes. Can Geotech J 41(3):467–484
Scaringi G, Hu W, Xu Q, Huang R (2018) Shear-rate-dependent behavior of clayey bimaterial interfaces at landslide stress levels. Geophys Res Lett 45:766–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076214
Skempton AW (1964) Long-term stability of clay slopes. Geotechnique 14(2):75–101
Skempton AW (1985) Residual strength of clays in landslides, folded strata and the laboratory. Geotechnique 35(1):3–18
Ter-Stepanian G (1963) On the long term stability of slopes. Nor Geotech Inst 52:1–14
Torii T, Kitagawa R (2006) Mineralogical characteristics of smectite formed in the toyooka tuff formation of the kobe group-special attention to the occurrence of landslide in this region. Clay Sci Soc Jpn 45(4):238–249 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Waker LK (1969) Undrained creep in sensitive clay. Geotechnique 19(4):515–529
Yatabe R, Yagi N, Enoki M, Nakamori K (1991) Strength characteristics of landslide clay. J Jpn Landslide Soc 28(1):9–16 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Yen BC (1969) Stability of slopes undergoing creep deformation. Soil Mech Found Div SM 4:1075–1096
Yin ZY, Chang CS, Karstunen M, Hicher PY (2010) an anisotropic elastic-viscoplastic model for soft clays. Int J of Sol and Struc 47:665–677
Acknowledgements
Majority of the experimental data used in this article are extracted from the undergraduate and graduate theses of the students that worked with me in their graduation research. As the lead researcher on this topic, I would like to acknowledge the primary data obtained from tremendous set of laboratory experiments conducted by Deepak Raj Bhat, who obtained his Doctor of Engineering degree from Ehime University in 2014 and Yuka Okamoto, who obtained her master’s degree in 2013. Prof. Ryuichi Yatabe, who supervised my doctoral dissertation research in 2000–2003 and also critically commented on the significance of these experimental data in understanding the real landslide creep behavior, is the main motivation for the idea that led to modifying an existing torsional ring shear machine and conduct residual-state shear creep tests. Moreover, the financial assistance of JSPS Grant-in-aid for scientific research (Kaken-hi, Kiban-C, 2012–2014) helped develop the modified ring shear machine employed in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhandary, N.P. (2023). Experimental Simulation of Landslide Creep in Ring Shear Machine. In: Alcántara-Ayala, I., et al. Progress in Landslide Research and Technology, Volume 1 Issue 2, 2022. Progress in Landslide Research and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18471-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18471-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18470-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-18471-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)