Abstract
The mining of stratified ore deposits requires detailed knowledge of the location of orebody boundaries. In the Banded Iron Formation (BIF) hosted iron ore deposits located in the Pilbara region of Western Australia the natural gamma logs are useful tool to identify stratigraphic boundaries. However, manually interpreting these features is subjective and time consuming due to the large volume of data. In this study, we propose a novel approach to automatically detect natural gamma signatures. We implemented a LSTM based algorithm for automated detection of signatures. We achieved a relatively high accuracy using gamma sequences with and without added noise. Further, no feature extraction or selection is performed in this work. Hence, LSTM can be used to detect different signatures in natural gamma logs even with noise. So, this system can be introduced in mining as an aid for geoscientists.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
In the Banded Iron Formation (BIF) hosted iron ore deposits located in the Pilbara region of Western Australia, natural gamma logs are frequently used to determine the location of stratigraphic boundaries [1]. The location of these boundaries is required for accurate modelling of the deposit. These deposits consist of layers of BIF and shale, with sections of the BIF enriched to create a minable high grade ore [2]. This paper studies a typical Marra Mamba type iron ore deposit, with iron ore in the Mount Newman Member overlain by the shale in the West Angelas Member.
The natural gamma logs are one of several geophysical logs that are typically collected in exploration holes, along with density and magnetic susceptibility. As thousands of holes may be drilled for a single deposit, manually interpreting them can be an arduous process. Additionally, it is prone to inconsistencies between different interpreters as well as errors. Therefore an automatic method that can assist the interpretation is greatly desired. A computer-aided method is a better option as it can provide a fast, objective, and reliable analysis. Many studies have been conducted on the development of automatically identified boundaries based on machine learning applications, including several studies on these types of deposit [3, 4]. However, the process of choosing a set of optimal features to classify a signature from the signal is very difficult. Therefore, a deep learning technique is presented in this study to overcome the challenges faced by conventional automated systems. A deep learning network involves several stages of learning processes, including an input layer, hidden layers, and an output layer [5]. The network takes unprocessed data as the input and learns the representative features that needed for classification without user input. The network is trained using the backpropagation algorithm.
In this study we investigated the capability of a long short-term memory (LSTM) network to classify several geological signatures from a gamma log. LSTM is a type of recurrent neural network mostly used to analyse time series sequence data [6]. In this study the authors investigated the capability of a LSTM network to classify several geological signatures from a gamma log sequence data along the down hole samples. The work demonstrates a classifier with three different outputs that can differentiate AS1-AS2 signals and NS3-NS4 signals from long gamma sequence.
2 Data Used
Natural gamma logs from a typical Marra Mamba style iron ore deposit were used. This deposit contains two natural gamma signatures of particular interest. The first signature is produced by the AS1-AS2 shales at the base of the West Angelas Member (Fig. 1a) and marks the transition between the shale and the Mount Newman ore below. The second signature comes from the NS3-NS4 shale bands (Fig. 1b) that mark a transition between two geological units within the Mount Newman Member. 42 examples of each of these signatures were chosen, along with 42 examples of other signatures from different parts of the natural gamma logs.
3 Methodology
3.1 Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)
In order to train a deep neural network to classify each signal along the depth of sequence data, a sequence-to-sequence LSTM network was used as proposed in Matlab R2019a [7]. The existing method was used to make prediction for each time step of the sequence. However, in this study, the method was used to make prediction of depth sequence data.
The proposed method consists of a LSTM layer, with tanh as the activation function. LSTM layer was set to have 200 hidden units and output the full sequence. The final layer, which is a fully connected (FC) layer with a softmax activation function, is used as the classifier with three classes. The classifier uses the output from the LSTM as the input and predicts the class label of the gamma signatures for a given sequence. The ‘adam’ optimizer was used and training was happened with different number of epochs.
3.2 Training and Validation
In order to analyze the capability of the LSTM architecture for identifying gamma signatures, a range of tests were performed. Out of 42 sequences, 30 sequences were used as training samples and rest were used as test samples. Two training libraries were used. In the first library all samples had the same signal order. The other library had two different sequence sets: AS1-AS2, other and NS3-NS4 in order, NS3-NS4, AS1-AS2 and other in order.
Figure 2 shows twelve test samples each containing a combination of AS1-AS2 and NS3-NS4 signatures along with signatures from other sections of the logs. The test sequences have the AS1-AS2, NS3-NS4 and other signals in different order. The first six test sequences have the signals in the order AS1-AS2, other and NS3-NS4, and the other six sequences have the order NS3-NS4, AS1-AS2 and other. To test the robustness of this method to noise, the test was re-run with random noise added to the test samples.
In total four tests were completed. Case 1 and Case 2 were trained using libraries 1 and 2 respectively and were both stopped at epoch 200. Case 3 was trained with library 2 and stopped at epoch 228. Case 4 used the same training as Case 3, but predicted the signature classes of samples with added noise.
4 Results and Discussion
The accuracy and loss of the proposed method from the training as a function of epochs can be seen in Fig. 3. Each plot is associated with different training library and different epochs. In case one library 1 was used to train the net. Then the net was used to predict the signatures in the original test samples (no noise added) (Fig. 2a). In other cases, library 2 was used in the training process with epochs 200 and 228. Prediction accuracy was tested on both original and noisy samples (Fig. 2). In all scenarios a high accuracy were achieved during the training process (Fig. 3). The performance is summarized in Figs. 4 and 5.
In Fig. 4a it can be seen that the classification accuracies are significantly higher in the first 6 sequences compared to the remaining six sequences. This is because the net used in prediction was trained with library 1, which has all signals in the same order. Without the inclusion of different signal orders in the training process, the LSTM method failed to identify signals where the order was different. In comparison, when training with mixed order samples the LSTM closely predicted the signals in 11 out of 12 samples (Fig. 4b). The accuracy of the prediction was further improved at epoch 228, where the author stopped the training where accuracy of the network peaked (Fig. 4c). The same trained network obtained relatively good accuracy in the noisy test samples as well (Fig. 4d.). In all scenarios test sample 7 yielded a much lower accuracy. This is because the AS1-AS2 signature in that sample is quite different to the other AS1-AS2 signatures.
5 Conclusion
In this paper, a deep learning based solution using LSTM is developed for natural gamma signature identification. The proposed method learns patterns from gamma sequences, and could successfully identify the significant AS1-AS2 and NS3-NS4 signatures. With only a few training samples it generally achieved a relatively high accuracy. However, the accuracy was dependent on the signal order present in the training samples. Further evaluation is needed with increasing training samples with different sequence lengths.
References
Harmsworth, R.A., Kneeshaw, M., Morris, R.C., Robinson, C.J., Shrivastava, P.K.: BIF-derived iron ores of the Hamersley Province. In: Hughes, F.E. (eds.) Geology of the Mineral Deposits of Australia and Papua New Guinea, pp. 617–642. The Australasian Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne (1990)
Thorne, S.W., Hagemann, S., Webb, A., Clout, J.: Banded iron formation-related iron ore deposits of the Hamersley Province, Western Australia. In: Hagemann, S., Rosiere, C., Gutzmer, J., Beukes, N.J. (eds.) Banded Iron Formation-Related High Grade Iron Ore; Rev. Econ. Geol. 15, 197–221 (2008)
Silversides, K., Melkumyan, M., Wyman, D., Hatherly, P.: Automated recognition of stratigraphic marker shales from geophysical logs in iron ore deposits. Comp. Geo. 77, 118–125 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.02.002
Nathan, D., Duuring, P., Holden, E.J., Wedge, D., Horrocks, T.: Learning characteristic natural gamma shale marker signatures in iron ore deposits. Comp. Geo. 106, 77–88 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.06.001
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015)
Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)
MathWorks: Matlab R2019a documentation. https://au.mathworks.com/help/deeplearning/examples/sequence-to-sequence-classification-using-deep-learning.html. Last accessed 01 May 2019
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the Australian Centre for Field Robotics and the Rio Tinto Centre for Mine Automation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Balamurali, M., Silversides, K.L. (2023). LSTM-Based Deep Learning Method for Automated Detection of Geophysical Signatures in Mining. In: Avalos Sotomayor, S.A., Ortiz, J.M., Srivastava, R.M. (eds) Geostatistics Toronto 2021. GEOSTATS 2021. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19845-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19845-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19844-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19845-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)