Abstract
The study of creativity in the arts provides an opportunity to present the ways in which new technology has placed new demands on artists. It can also open up new possibilities for the expression of creativity by artists. It expands on the ways in which technology is used by artists as a tool to reflect on the human aspiration for a better future. The artists’ collective localStyle is presented as a case study to demonstrate how collaborations between artists, scientists and technologists has led to multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary projects.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
3.1 Introduction
The development of new technologies in the 1960s prompted a new generation of artists to experiment with the new media, thus transforming understandings of art. New media art is the term given to all forms of contemporary art made, altered, or transmitted using technologies developed since the 1980s. It is ever-expanding and defies categorization. It includes artists using a range of ‘off the shelf’ software or learning coding to make artworks that are contained only in digital files. Unlike painting, which has an historic established lineage, new media art has attracted artists from different disciplines and with divergent viewpoints. For example, some artists in the field of music, dance and sculpture have used video as medium to forge new strategies for art making [1].
3.2 Origins of Art and Technology
A characteristic of twentieth century art has been its questioning of painting as a privileged medium for making art. As early as the late nineteenth century the artist Eadweard Muybridge (1830–1904) was a pioneer in manipulating photographic images. His motion picture projections were arguably the first time that art and technology coexisted.
In 1966 the artists Robert Rauschenberg (1925–2008) and Robert Whitman (b.1935) founded the non-profit making organization E.A.T. (Experiments in Art and Technology) with engineers from Bell Telephone Laboratories (the research component of the AT&T telephone conglomerate). Traditional art forms such as painting were seen by some as obsolete, and Rauschenberg declared:
If you don’t accept technology you better go to another place, because no place is safe here……Nobody wants to paint rotten oranges anymore [2].
The subjectivity of art has challenged research communities that are entrenched in the scientific method. However, increasingly science communities are working with artists in recognition that their methodological approaches involve problem finding, as opposed to problem solving, and this can lead to productive collaborations.
The European laboratory for Particle Physics CERN recognizes the importance of fostering dialogs between artists and scientists and offers artists residencies, commissions and an events program to build bridges between the two cultures [3]. Dutch artist Rosa Menkman was resident at CERN Collide between 2019–2021, and artworks (Fig. 3.1) resulting from her continuous dialog with physicists and engineers were exhibited at SJSU art galleries in the USA in March 2020 [4].
3.3 Digital Artworks
Digital photography has assisted the process of digital transformation of society. For example, 95 million photos and videos were shared on Instagram per day in 2021 [5]. Russell Kirsch (1929–2020), the scientist who invented the digital image scanner that created the first digital photograph (Fig. 3.2), has enabled images to be produced, reproduced, repositioned, refined and combined in unique new ways.
Early experiments in computer art involved computer scientists and mathematicians. In the1960s it was only research laboratories and large corporations that could afford computers. It wasn’t until the ‘plotter’; a device to hold a pen was developed, that artist such as Frieder Nake became a pioneer in using the computer creatively to produce computer art. Curator Barbara London, on seeing her first computer art show in 1970, thought.
This is no longer the case as cultural computing is now a field in itself with organizations such as The Computer Arts Society that is a specialist interest group of the British Computer Society, (The Chartered Institute for IT) [8]. Since 1990 Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA) has organized annual conferences to bring together the application of new technologies to the arts and cultural domains [9].
3.4 Art and Science Collaborative Research
The effectiveness of the contemporary arts in assessing non-art concerns has given it credibility in its role in multi-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary research. This has resulted in artists’ interventions becoming more influential in citizen science.
The collaborative artistic platform, localStyle, creates artworks that are displayed in galleries and open public spaces, which helps to highlight problems associated with the climate emergency and resource extraction. The founders, the visual artist Marlena Novak and the composer, Jay Alan Yim, critically re-assess these ‘Grand Challenges’ and have engaged the expertise of a number of scientists for their projects. They often present works and events together with the collective known as ‘Deep Time Chicago’, which is part of a global movement working around the theme of the Anthropocene and includes artists, cultural theorists and a biologist [10].
3.5 Case Study—LocalStyle: Choral and Timeslips
The climate change themed projection “Choral”, is a project created in collaboration with researchers to raise awareness of the necessity to protect coral habitats. These play an important role in ocean conservation. The habitats that the coral create are fundamental to the sustainability of a quarter of all marine species and the livelihoods of 500 million people around the planet. Novak has said
these eco systems are in crisis and we hope that the public will be engaged by the beauty and charisma of these creatures and then it will lead to greater appreciation for ocean conservation efforts [11]
Choral is a 12 min audio visual installation commissioned by 150 Media Stream for a sculpturally unique LED panel display (Fig. 3.3).
The resulting artwork from this project is now part of the world’s largest permanent digital art projection onto a public building Art on theMART. Initial iterations of the work were on display at 150 N Riverside Plaza Chicago (Fig. 3.4) [12].
Another localStyle art/science project is “Timeslips” (Fig. 3.5); a video installation commissioned by the Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Berlin (HKW) [13] and the Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte in 2019. Exhibited in venues in the USA, Berlin, and London, the artwork places the viewer in the mind of an agronomist working on Mars, who ponders the injustices created by humans attempt to control water on Earth. The title refers to a pause in time caused by Mars having a rotational period slightly longer than that of Earth; with the solution to that difference being a programmed pause between 00:00:00 midnight and 00:01:00. This “Timeslip”, when the clock is suspended, is described by the narrator as a time when the past and present collide, and a time used for introspection, reflection, and mindfulness. Inspired by Kim Stanley Robinson’s Mars Trilogy novels (1992), the narrator remembers the absurdity of water management on planet earth, 34 million miles away, where either too much or too little water is problematic.
HKW commissioned localStyle to develop an iteration of Timeslips which resulted in a sculptural assisted readymade “Fourteen Slices of Time” (2020) (Fig. 3.6). Fourteen custom-printed postcards with film stills from “Timeslips” were displayed on a simple stand that fits inside an American mailbox to act as souvenirs that trigger memories of Earth.
The Mississippi as an Anthropocene river is the theme of several of localStyle’s work. “Re-percussions” (2021) (Fig. 3.7) was an artwork made to support the resistance against the Line 3 oil pipeline in Chicago. This pipeline in Minnesota has been routed through agricultural and sacred land in violation of an existing treaty with the indigenous Anishinaabe native Americans.
3.6 Discussion
Often science and technology may be perceived as the primary driver in a material world, resulting in the arts and humanities being forced into a more reactive position. However, when questions are asked about the values of the science, or the meaning that technological developments have uncovered, these disciplines are often at a loss. It may be regarded as ‘beyond science’. At the same time, art practice has been forced by these developments to think of knowledge acquisition outside that of art alone. Therefore, all parties can be beneficiaries of collaboration as has been seen from the case studies in this chapter.
Art is a catalyst for knowledge acquisition with art theory and practice leading to questions outside that of art alone. Curatorial and institutional notions of ‘research’, as seen in museums and art galleries, complements research in the humanities, the natural sciences, and the social sciences. Curator Tom Holert predicts a sea change in the understanding of the power and reach of artistic research [14]. A new paradigm for artistic research was also debated in ‘The Postresearch Condition’ EARN/Smart Culture Conference in Utrecht in the spring of 2021. Art is often embedded within transdisciplinary research environments. Artist Amanda Beech describes how when we think of research we are drawn to “ends”, but for the arts and humanities knowing requires a conceptualization of something that is beyond the usual measures imposed on knowledge production [15].
3.7 Conclusions
The impact of research all too often is drawn to the use of scientific reasoning and metrics to quantify the social or economic impact of research, but sometimes it takes artists to make sure this knowledge is really understood. localStyle’s work is deeply embedded in the dynamics of social and political life. Their critique and reflection on climate action offers more than an esthetic solution; but an ethical, political, and psychological sense of responsibility that raises awareness and makes a relevant contribution to society.
Scientific and artistic thinking give us two complementary tools to understand the complexity of the world with science reducing experience to essential principles and art intensifying and expanding our experiences. The novelist A. S. Byatt said
art explores connections like those in ways very different from science’s ordering – even though scientists are aided by flashes of inspiration [16].
Together art and science give us harmonizing views and explore in different ways the complexity of knowing and understanding the world.
Chapter 4 explores how artistic research exploits the technological age to create new artworks often created in collaboration that reflect upon knowledge production and notions of reality.
References
London, B.: Video Art, p. 10. Phaidon, London (2020)
Rose, F.: The Big Bang and Tech in New York. New York Times (2015). Available online at: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/08/arts/design/the-big-bang-of-art-and-tech-in-new-york.html
Arts at CERN. https://arts.cern/programme/artistic-residencies
Menkman, R.: Shadow Knowledge Exhibition. https://beyondresolution.info/Shadow-Knowledge (2020)
Francis, J.: https://www.oregonlive.com/entertainment/erry-2018/05/9e71d5e0cd475/creator_of_worlds_first_digita.html (2007)
London, B.: Video Art, p. 25. Phaidon, London (2020)
The Computer Arts Society. https://computer-arts-society.com/about
Electronic Visualisation and the Arts. http://www.eva-london.org/about/
Deep Time Chicago. https://deeptimechicago.org/
Gesicki, K.: Chicago artists collaborate with Art on theMART for spring program; focus on climate change. https://columbiachronicle.com/chicago-artists-collaborate-with-art-on-themart-for-spring-program-focus-on-climate-change (2022)
Novak, M., Yim, J.A.: Coral voices. In: Earnshaw, R., Liggett, S., Excell, P., Thalmann, D. (eds) Technology, Design and the Arts—Opportunities and Challenges. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42097-0_11
Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Berlin. https://www.hkw.de/en/programm/beitragende_hkw/n/marlena_novak.php
Holert, T.: Knowledge Beside Itself. Sternberg Press, Berlin (2020)
Beech, A.: Art’s Intolerable Knowledge. EARN, Utrecht. http://amandabeech.com/writing/art-intolerable-knowledge/ (2021)
Byatt, A.S., cited in Ede, S.: Strange and Charmed. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, London (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liggett, S. (2023). Creativity and Artist Technologist. In: Creativity in Art, Design and Technology. Springer Series on Cultural Computing(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24869-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24869-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24868-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24869-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)