Abstract
This research integrates the human component as a living part of the control loop, using preferences to optimise energy consumption. This paper presents an outline of a temperature controller, which is based on the theory of thermal comfort and uses fuzzy logic to optimise comfort and reduce energy consumption. The controller allows multiple-inputs, from more than one single user to set a temperature-setpoint. The control-logic was developed in MATLAB using the Simulink tool in the simulations, energy use is optimized, reducing energy consumption between 22 and 31%. The controller was tested in an office to improve the average thermal sensation of the participants between 14 and 17%. In future works increase the sample size and evaluate the non-energy impacts of the energy efficiency on thermal comfort.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Thermal comfort controller
- Thermostat
- Energy efficiency
- Simulation
- Predicted mean vote
- Energy consumption
- Built environment
11.1 Introduction
The human factor is the fundamental piece to understanding energy consumption, as people consume energy. Engineering systems often do not consider people as variables in time and less the differences that may exist between a group of people [1]. In this document, we integrate the people directly into a temperature controller that reduces energy consumption while using as the main indicator the thermal sensation of users.
Thermal comfort is an essential concept in building design according to ASHRAE Standard 55 [2], thermal comfort occurs when the person feels contented with the surrounding environmental temperature. People’s efficiency and productivity are associated with thermal comfort; at the same time, the thermal comfort level is estimated through the metabolic rate [3]. Having a good understanding of these relationships is important to improve the general conditions of a room and the quality of life of the occupants, and in some cases can save energy.
The predicted mean vote (PMV) methodology has the objective of predicting the thermal sensation in buildings [4]. The prediction is based on equations developed in 1960 which are described in the paper [5] The literature on PMV applied in fuzzy logic is extensive. Table 11.1 shows the studies in detail, classifying them according to the setpoint type (user temperature input, automatic setpoint, or not specified ‘NS’) and if taking in consideration the energy consumption on the control loop to do energy optimization, not in consideration or not specified.
Table 11.1 shows that most of the articles (15 out of 20) consider energy optimisation. Table 11.1 shows how fuzzy logic is almost always implemented to optimise energy consumption. In most of the identified research studies (12 out of 20 papers) users are not allowed to choose a setpoint-temperature. Rather, the researchers used fuzzy logic to automatically choose a temperature setpoint. Dovjak and Shukuya [11] apply fuzzy logic in thermal comfort control, such as temperature, and combine a level of thermal sensation, similar to how the PMV equation works. The PMV equation takes physical values and gives a thermal sensation value. However, in this study, they do not consider the thermal sensation and compared with the PMV model it.
According to [26] ASHRAE’s [26] in the 1970s when the first steps were taken to develop a thermal comfort model, the concept of PMV was developed. The main concept in the PMV model is the body’s thermal neutrality, The scale, 0 represents thermal neutrality, 1, 2 and 3 represent different levels of sensation of heat and − 1, − 2 and − 3 levels of sensation of cold.
Thermal comfort null (equal to 0), only when the heat generated minus heat transfer to the environment (L = Qgenerate − Qtransfer) is equal to 0. A body thermal load of 0 represents a heat transfer level to keep the temperature of the body stable, and a heat transfer at a comfortable value. Six factors directly affect thermal neutrality: Metabolic Rate (W/m2), Clothing insulation (dimensionless), Air temperature (°C), Radiant temperature (°C), Airspeed (m/s), Humidity (dimensionless). The first two factors, metabolic rate and clothing insulation depend on the users and correspond, respectively, to the activity they carry out and to the clothing they wear, the other 4 factors depend on the environment.
In the PMV model, it is necessary to calculate the predicted percentage of dissatisfaction (PPD). The equation that models PPD is an inverted Gaussian and is a function of the PMV, the equations are described in detail in the literature [5]. When PMV is 0 the PPD is equal to 5% (minimum); the PMV model keeps the PPD lower than 10%, which corresponds to 0.5 and − 0.5 PMV. In the literature, they suggest using the PPD as KPI for the building’s thermostats [2].
11.2 Methodology
The chosen methodology combines the PMV model with fuzzy logic to set the temperature setpoint, with two objectives: to reduce energy consumption and improve thermal comfort. The control logic was tested in a simulated virtual environment and then tested in a real environment.
11.2.1 Simulation Components
Simulink provides access to control components in fuzzy logic, which is the type of control we have chosen for controller derived. The innovative approach is the input, a fuzzy variable ranging from cold to hot, which the controller can interpret. In the other studies, carried out in the literature review, the temperature setpoint is a numerical variable, while here we allow the input as a fuzzy-variable. The second innovation is to allow more than a single input of more than one user and give the system the tools to prioritise medium comfort.
Figure 11.1 shows the model designed in Simulink with the main components: (A) the user thermostat interface, (B) the thermostat (fuzzy temperature controller), (C) the boiler and (D) the house heat transfer system. The novel proposition of this project is the user interface, allowing the users to express their thermal sensation. The thermostat uses fuzzy logic and fuzzy-inputs to set a temperature setpoint.
11.2.2 Room
The model of the room in Fig. 11.2 is made with equivalent thermal components, thermal resistances, thermal inertias for the walls and ceiling and the thermal inertia of the air inside the room. To simulate the heat transfer the model uses material normally used in construction in the UK [27]. In this model, the only source of heat is a water heater that transmits heat to the room. The model takes the external temperature as input data, which transforms from digital to an analogue signal and then determines the internal temperature. The room temperature differential equation cannot be solved explicitly. Therefore, MATLAB uses numerical methods to provide a solution at each time step.
11.2.3 Boiler
The boiler system was built with the tools supplied by Simulink and with the parameters of the ASHRAE [27], such as the water temperature, the calorific value of the fuel, and the type of boiler, and the efficiency of combustion and the humidity of the inlet air. Figure 11.3 shows the boiler components: (a) the fuel pump, (b) the air compressor, and (c) the combustion chamber.
11.2.4 Test Real Environment
A fundamental part of this project was to compare the PMV with the relative thermal comfort level and actual thermal sensation expressed by a user. For this, it would be advisable to implement a survey that allows users to provide relevant information for the study, such as the level of experienced thermal comfort, clothing factor, and metabolic activity level. The survey follows the standard structure [2].
The control system was tested in an office where users could express their thermal preferences on the ASHRAE scale. Figure 11.4 shows a diagram of how we proceeded in the experiment, in this case, we worked with a human operator who controlled the HVAC system. The test was done at Teesside University, lasted 2 weeks and 5 people participated.
During the first week of testing, the participants expressed their thermal sensation in the survey while the temperature of the office was not modified. During the second week the developed controller was tested, and the responses of the users were used to modify the temperature. In this case, a human operator entered the resulting setpoints from the developed controller and manually controlled the existing thermostat based on what the fuzzy temperature controller indicated.
11.3 Results and Discussion
The two results of this study are: (1) The results of the MATLAB simulation show that fuel consumption was reduced by 22% when implementing a controller with 5 multiple users and 31% with a single user (Fig. 11.5); (2) the results of the test in the offices show that the comfort of the participants was improved between 14 and 17% (Fig. 11.6).
The improvement in thermal sensation was 14% if we compare only the ‘neutral’ responses but if we include the ‘Slightly warm’ or ‘Slightly cool’ responses, the improvement is 17%. ‘Slightly warm’ or ‘Slightly cool’ levels are points at which a person can adapt to that temperature because their level of discomfort is not very great, for example wearing or taking off a sweater. In the PMV model, the PPD is kept below 10%, that is, the PMV is between − 0.5 and 0.5, for this reason taking box a would be more restrictive and on the other hand taking box b is more flexible than the PMV model.
11.4 Conclusion
The information shown in this document serves as a framework for the development of a fuzzy controller based on thermal comfort theory. The methodologies that allow the application of the theory of thermal comfort in practice were presented, as well as the tools that MATLAB offers to simulate laboratories.
On the subject of energy efficiency, there are many things that we still do not know. Integrating the human factor in the modelling of energy efficiency can yield good results. For example, in HVAC systems, the goal should be to keep people comfortable, rather than maintaining a fixed temperature. This way we can avoid unnecessary energy consumption and improve the thermal sensation of building users. The next step will be to test the controller in a larger and more complex environment to obtain conclusive results.
References
J. Sterman, System dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world (2002)
ASHRAE, Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Am. Soc. Heating, Refrigerating Air-Conditioning Eng. Atlanta (ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55–2004) (2004)
S. Mohamed, K. Srinavin, Forecasting labor productivity changes in construction using the PMV index. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 35(4), 345–351 (2005)
J. Van Hoof, Forty years of Fanger's model of thermal comfort: comfort for all? Indoor Air 18(3), 182–201 (2008)
G. Ye, C. Yang, Y. Chen, Y. Li, A new approach for measuring predicted mean vote (PMV) and standard effective temperature (SET∗). Build. Environ. 38(1), 33–44 (2003)
A. Keshtkar, S. Arzanpour, A fuzzy logic system for demand-side load management in residential buildings. in 2014 IEEE 27th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE) (IEEE, 2014, May), pp. 1–5
A. Keshtkar, S. Arzanpour, F. Keshtkar, An autonomous system via fuzzy logic for residential peak load management in smart grids. In 2015 North American Power Symposium (NAPS) (IEEE, 2015 October), pp. 1–6
A. Keshtkar, S. Arzanpour, F. Keshtkar, P. Ahmadi, Smart residential load reduction via fuzzy logic, wireless sensors, and smart grid incentives. Energy Buildings 104, 165–180 (2015)
P. Bermejo, L. Redondo, L. de la Ossa, D. RodrÃguez, J. Flores, C. Urea, J.A. Gámez, J.M. Puerta, Design and simulation of a thermal comfort adaptive system based on fuzzy logic and on-line learning. Energy Buildings 49, 367–379 (2012)
R. Alcalá, J. Alcalá-Fdez, F. Herrera, A proposal for the genetic lateral tuning of linguistic fuzzy systems and its interaction with rule selection. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15(4), 616–635 (2007)
M. Dovjak, M. Shukuya, Integral control of hospital environment. in 2011 IEEE Power Engineering and Automation Conference, vol 3 (IEEE, 2011, September), pp. 128–131
H. Yan, Y. Pan, Z. Li, S. Deng, Further development of a thermal comfort based fuzzy logic controller for a direct expansion air conditioning system. Appl. Energy 219, 312–324 (2018)
Q.U. Ain, S. Iqbal, S.A. Khan, A.W. Malik, I. Ahmad, N. Javaid, IoT operating system based fuzzy inference system for home energy management system in smart buildings. Sensors 18(9), 2802 (2018)
S. Merabti, B. Draoui, F. Bounaama, A review of control systems for energy and comfort management in buildings. in 2016 8th international conference on modelling, identification and control (ICMIC) (IEEE, 2016, November), pp. 478–486
D. Makkar, P. Syal, Simulation of intelligent room lighting illuminance control. in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC) (IEEE, 2017, December), pp. 1–4
F. Budiman, M. Rivai, I.G.B.P. Raditya, D. Krisrenanto, I.Z. Amiroh, Smart control of air conditioning system based on number and activity level of persons. in 2018 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA) (IEEE, 2018 August), pp. 431–436
G. Palmieri, G. Fiengo, A hierarchical control strategy for energy optimization. IFAC Proc. Vol. 39(19), 111–116 (2006)
A. Keshtkar, S. Arzanpour, An adaptive fuzzy logic system for residential energy management in smart grid environments. Appl. Energy 186, 68–81 (2017)
S. Javaid, N. Javaid, Comfort evaluation of seasonally and daily used residential load in smart buildings for hottest areas via predictive mean vote method. Sustain. Comput. Inf. Syst. 25, 100369 (2020)
Y.Y. Ghadi, M.M.G. Rasul, M.K.K. Khan, Recent developments of advanced fuzzy logic controllers used in smart buildings in subtropical climate. Energy Proc. 61, 1021–1024 (2014)
Y.Y. Ghadi, M.G. Rasul, M.M.K. Khan, Optimization of advanced fuzzy based control system of institutional building management system (BMS) in Australian subtropical climate (2016)
D. Kolokotsa, D. Tsiavos, G.S. Stavrakakis, K. Kalaitzakis, E. Antonidakis, Advanced fuzzy logic controllers design and evaluation for buildings’ occupants thermal–visual comfort and indoor air quality satisfaction. Energy Buildings 33(6), 531–543 (2001)
H. Khodadadi, A. Dehghani, Fuzzy logic self-tuning PID controller design based on smith predictor for heating system. in 2016 16th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS) (IEEE, 2016, October), pp. 161–166
M.I.M. Rawi, A. Al-Anbuky, Development of intelligent wireless sensor networks for human comfort index measurement. Proc. Comput. Sci. 5, 232–239 (2011)
A. Dehghani, H. Khodadadi, Designing a neuro-fuzzy PID controller based on smith predictor for heating system. in 2017 17th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS) (IEEE, 2017, October), pp. 15–20
ASHRAE, Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Am. Soc. Heating, Refrigerating Air-Conditioning Eng. Atlanta (ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55–2017) (2017)
ASHRAE, High-performance sequences of operation for HVAC system, Am. Soc. Heating, Refrigerating Air-Conditioning Eng. Atlanta (ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 36, No. 2018) (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Segovia, E., van Schaik, P., Vukovic, V. (2023). Indoor Thermal Comfort Controller Integrating Human Interaction in the Control-Loop as a Live Component. In: Nixon, J.D., Al-Habaibeh, A., Vukovic, V., Asthana, A. (eds) Energy and Sustainable Futures: Proceedings of the 3rd ICESF, 2022. ICESF 2022. Springer Proceedings in Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30960-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30960-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30959-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30960-1
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)