Abstract
Non-conceptive sexual behavior (NCSB) is phylogenetically widespread, having been documented in 35 of the 87 extant cetacean species, but function and form of NCSB have not been studied in comparative manner. Many cetacean species engage in NCSB across a wide variety of settings and contexts (e.g., play, sexual, affiliative). NCSB includes both social and non-social sexual behaviors, such as non-social masturbation on the environment or social same-sex thrusting toward a conspecific, but importantly, none of the behavior described as NCSB affords reproduction. While these two general categories encompass all sexual actions, the behaviors are diverse depending on species, social structure, and sex of the individual being observed. Social sexual behavior presumably has individual or social benefits. This chapter organizes what is known about NCSB in cetaceans by summarizing NCSB repertoires from peer-reviewed literature and discussing proposed functions (e.g., practice for reproduction, attracting opposite-sex mates, reducing the reproductive opportunities of same-sex conspecifics, reinforcing dominance relationships, alliance formation, reconciliation, and social tension reduction). Further, the form or behavioral repertoire, the sex of the individuals engaging in NCSB, the environment observed in, and whether NCSB was present or absent in general are noted from each of the articles reviewed. Overall, NCSB behavior observed across species shares similar elements (e.g., thrusting, lateral presentations) in both Mysticeti and Odontoceti. NCSB tends to be more prevalent among sexually immature compared to sexually mature individuals. Additionally, NCSB is more prevalent between male conspecifics compared to females when animals engage in same-sex NCSB. Interspecific NCSB has also been reported for a number of species. While most reports come from toothed whales, the limited observations of baleen whales have also found that many species engage in NCSB, making it likely that NCSB is included in the behavioral repertoire of most cetacean species. NCSB likely aids in forming and maintaining social relations and/or in the development of sexual repertoires in cetaceans, not unlike what has been proposed for primates. We hope this chapter sparks interest in comparative studies of NCSB and sheds light on the similarities of NCSB across species.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Behavioral phylogeny
- Behavioral repertoire
- Bonding
- Inter-species interactions
- Masturbation
- Physical form
- Play behavior
- Same-sex sexual behavior
- Socio-sexual behavior
7.1 Introduction
Non-conceptive sexual behavior (NCSB), or socio-sexual behavior, is sexual in form but does not facilitate direct reproduction and has been reported in more than 300 animal species from insects to primates (Bagemihl 1999; Bailey and Zuk 2009). NCSB often involves mounting interactions during which the participants employ stereotyped copulatory movements (including pelvic thrusting) in non-reproductive contexts. NCSB can occur between two sexually immature individuals (Gunst et al. 2013), sexually immature and sexually mature (Ogawa 2006), two same-sex sexually mature animals (Hohmann and Fruth 2000), two opposite-sex sexually mature animals (Gunst et al. 2020), or even between different species (Gunst et al. 2018). Socio-sexual behavior is a subset of NCSB that appears sexual in terms of its outward form but is thought to primarily be used to mediate adaptive goals that are not directly related to reproductive coitus (Wickler 1967). These adaptive goals are often employed to solve social problems the participants encounter.
Multiple functions have been proposed for NCSB, including practice for reproduction, attracting opposite-sex mates, reducing the reproductive opportunities of same-sex conspecifics, reinforcing dominance relationships, alliance formation, reconciliation, and social tension reduction (reviewed in Vasey 1995; Bagemihl 1999; Bailey and Zuk 2009). For example, female mountain gorillas (Gorilla g. beringei) may use NCSB to re-affirm dominance hierarchy (Grueter and Stoinski 2016). In Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata), sexually mature females mount sexually mature males (often with pelvic thrusting), which prompts the male to mount the female (Gunst et al. 2020). Mutual genital contact, where one animal touches the genitals of the other and vice versa, between male yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus anubis) appears to facilitate alliance formation (Smuts and Watanabe 1990), and ventro-dorsal mounting among female vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) appears to achieve the same function (Fairbanks 2002).
The topic of NCSB has been most studied in primates; however, non-primate exemplars do exist. For example, courtship behavior, mounting, and pair-bonding appear to facilitate alliance formation between male graylag geese (Anser anser; Kotrschal et al. 2006). Research on NCSB has also focused on smaller animals with little attention to large mammalian species, although, once again, exceptions exist (Hill et al. 2014). For example, evidence suggests that mounting between domestic cattle helps reinforce dominance relationships during periods of social uncertainty and stress (Klemm et al. 1983). For the most part, however, NCSB appears to be characterized by some mixture of both sexual and socio-sexual motivations (Vasey 1995; Bagemihl 1999). In bonobos (Pan paniscus), genito-genital rubbing is accompanied by vocalizations and facial expressions that are indicative of sexual reward, but it also appears to reduce social tension associated with food sharing (Hohmann and Fruth 2000).
Steadily increasing interest in cetaceans over the past 70 years has led to an explosion in the literature on various behavioral topics for these aquatic mammals. This growth in focus and the ability to study smaller cetacean species housed in managed care facilities have enabled a substantial increase in knowledge (e.g., behavior, physiology; see Chap. 10). This chapter reviews the literature on NCSB in cetaceans by outlining the distribution among species, general behavioral repertoire, and potential functions (Table 7.1).
7.2 Distribution of NCSB Across Mysticeti and Odontoceti
To illustrate the widespread distribution of NCSB across Cetacea, we created a cladogram using cladistic data from ten K tree project data (Arnold et al. 2010) and FigTree (Rambaut 2018). To date, 35 of the 87 extant species of Cetacea have been observed engaging in NCSB, in both managed care facilities and wild settings, with some species engaging in inter-species NCSB (Fig. 7.1). However, we suspect this is an underestimation as many cetaceans are under-studied (e.g., Ziphiidae, beaked whales). Evidence for this underestimation was found when comparing the research effort (i.e., the number of articles published on each species of Cetacea) as reported by Fox et al. (2017), compared to the presence or absence of NCSB. Employing a logistic regression (R Core Team 2020), we found that the number of articles previously published on a given species, as reported by Fox et al. 2017, predicted the presence or absence of NCSB in a given species that we report in this chapter (χ288 = 95.89, p < 0.001). This finding suggests that as species are studied more, evidence for NCSB in additional species will be found; though, this is a crude measurement and should only be used to encourage the study of behavior in species that are rarely reported on. This might be true of the highly cryptic Ziphiidae, which are rarely observed despite the number of species (i.e., more than 19) within this family. However, this prediction may be inaccurate as gregarious species, and thus the ones most likely to engage in NCSB, are more frequently studied. With increased behavioral observation through the use of drones (reviewed by Whitt et al. 2020; Ramos et al. 2023, this book), we suspect more species will be observed engaging in NCSB and that this behavior will be understood in greater detail (e.g., Orbach et al. 2020); though other factors, such as social structure, are far more important in predicting if a species engages in NCSB.
7.3 Behavioral Repertoire and Physical Form of NCSB
While most prominent in toothed whales, many species of baleen whales have also been observed engaging in NCSB with the behavioral repertoire of NCSB described across species showing similarities. Typically, NCSB consists of a few behaviors (e.g., thrusting, intromission, genital presentation, genital contact or manipulation, penile erections, and contact of another’s body with an individual’s ventral area); however, bouts of NCSB can also consist of just one of the behaviors listed in Table 7.2. Many of these behaviors (e.g., penile erections and ventral contact) also occur during courtship (e.g., Hill et al. 2015; Lilley et al. 2022), so describing the partners involved is important when deciphering if the behavior being observed is non-conceptive or copulatory. Species-specific descriptions of behavior, as well as corresponding references, are available as Supplementary Material.
NCSB can be contactless (Fig. 7.2) or involve physical contact (Fig. 7.3). For example, beluga whales (white whales, Delphinapterus leucas) engage in s-posture sexual presentations and lateral sexual presentations frequently without contact (Lilley et al. 2022), with sexually mature males often doing so toward sexually immature individuals (Hill et al. 2015; Lilley et al. 2020) (Fig. 7.4). Bubbles also seem to be a part of the beluga NCSB repertoire and may be used to communicate, either as a visual signal or as a result of vocalization (Hill et al. 2015). However, insertion, intromission, genital rubbing, mouthing, thrusting, and petting involve contact, whether it be with a conspecific, heterospecific, or inanimate object. Both contactless and contact NCSB occur between same-sex partners (male-male and female-female pairings) and mixed-sex partners, age-matched and non-age-matched partners, and between different species.
NCSB is most easily recognized when the partners are incapable of reproduction (i.e., two males or two females engaging in NSCB, two sexually immature animals engaging in NSCB, one sexually mature and one sexually immature animal engaging in NCSB, between two species that cannot produce hybrids) or with a dead conspecific (i.e., necrocoitus; Dudzinski et al. 2003; Kincaid et al. 2022). In addition, sexual behavior with an object or the environment (e.g., masturbation) is also a form of NCSB. When sexual behavior occurs between mixed-sex pairs and both animals are sexually mature, it is very difficult to determine if the behavior observed was NCSB in context or conceptive behavior, unless life history or hormonal information is available (e.g., age, sex, pregnancy status). For that reason, we describe behavior between same-sex partners, sexually mature-immature partners, or behavior between two species, with the caveat that NCSB likely also occurs between sexually mature mixed-sex partners. As well, in some species, NCSB may occur between multiple partners simultaneously (e.g., surface-active groups; Parks et al. 2007) (Fig. 7.5).
7.4 Possible Functions of NCSB
For some species, NCSB emerges within the first months of life, while for others it takes much longer. For example, thrusts and erections in sexually immature bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) and Yangtze finless porpoises (Neophocaena phocaenoides asiaeorientalis) emerge in the early months of life (Mann 2006; Xian et al. 2010), whereas thrusts are only observed after the first few months and erections after the first year of life in beluga whales (Ham et al. 2022). This variation could be due to differences in developmental timelines, juvenile periods, or social structures, but understanding the emergence of a behavior ultimately provides clues to the function of the behavior (e.g., practice, social bonding). Detailed studies of the development of NCSB can provide clues to the function, benefit, and adaptive value these behaviors might have on mating ecology, social relationship management, and the development of sexual behavior (Table 7.1).
7.4.1 Managing Social Relationships: Dominance, Greeting Behavior, and Bonding
While tooth raking is frequently associated with agonism and dominance relationships (Scott et al. 2005; Lee et al. 2019; Ham et al. 2021a; Grimes et al. 2022), NCSB has also been suggested to play a role in the formation of dominance relationships (Östman 1991; Mann 2006; Wu et al. 2010; Furuichi et al. 2014; Harvey et al. 2017; Serres et al. 2021) and may even occur at the same time. Dominance relationships among individuals may influence the success of copulatory behavior. One interesting question should be explored: are those that are more dominant more successful in copulatory behavior? Further, are these animals more successful because they are more dominant or because they engage in NCSB more frequently to maintain their dominance position or both? Studying the dominance position and number of offspring, in addition to the frequency of NCSB, for a given individual would begin to answer some of these questions.
In addition to dominance, same-sex NCSB can help manage social relationships or reduce social tension, especially for those species where social groups include unrelated individuals, as in some primates (reviewed by Vasey 1995; Furuichi et al. 2014). There is also evidence that dolphins employ NCSB in managing social relations (Tursiops spp.; Würsig and Würsig 1979; Connor and Mann 2006; Mann 2006; Harvey et al. 2017; Stenella longirostris, Norris and Dohl 1980; Sousa spp. Saayman and Tayler 1979; Lagenorhynchus obscurus, Würsig and Pearson 2014). This function may be especially true for those species that live in large pods and/or fission-fusion groups such as bottlenose dolphins, in which social relationships must be continuously negotiated, re-established, and re-affirmed. Long-term studies of Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins (T. aduncus) have found that male dolphins develop long-lasting bonds or alliances with other males (Connor et al. 1992, 2001, 2006, 2022) characterized by recurrent NCSB and symmetrical relationships (Mann 2006).
For some species, including bottlenose dolphins in managed care facilities, sexual play occurs nearly every day (Brown and Norris 1956). Studies of wild cetaceans have reported frequent NCSB (Johnson and Norris 1994; Connor et al. 2000; Mann 2006). For example, male bottlenose dolphin calves engage in NCSB at a rate of 2.38 interactions per hour (Mann 2006), which is quite frequent considering the generally poor visibility conditions which obstruct the human observers. Additionally, despite displaying typical copulatory behavior with sexually mature females on a seasonal basis, sexually mature male beluga whales in managed care facilities display a high frequency of NCSB throughout the year, except the month of peak conceptive behavior when male-male NCSB almost completely stops (Glabicky et al. 2010). With increasing age, the NCSB of beluga whales becomes seasonal, suggesting that maturity and fluctuation in hormone levels might be drivers (Ham et al. 2021b). The decrease in male-male pelvic thrusting during the months when beluga whales are mating suggests that pelvic thrusting serves both as a copulatory function (when directed toward females) and as a form of NCSB (when directed toward males). During the non-breeding months, the NCSB of same-sex thrusting seems to serve an adaptive social function such as social bonding or dominance hierarchy maintenance (Glabicky et al. 2010). Thus, for beluga whales, NCSB does not take the place of reproductive conceptive behavior but does seem to occupy a larger portion of a male beluga’s social interactions. Furthermore, s-posturing in beluga whales occurs in both agonistic/aggressive displays and courting displays (e.g., Hill et al. 2015), but the s-postures have different topographies in each context. The overlap of behaviors in sexual and aggressive contexts could be a result of dominance relationships being displayed and reinforced through both sexual means and aggressive displays or could be the result of specific behaviors taking on different meanings in different contexts. NCSB in beluga whales is highly reciprocal (Lilley et al. 2020; Manitzas Hill et al. 2022), at least between sexually mature males and sexually immature males, so more information on the reciprocity of such behavior is needed to determine if dominance is a possible function for this species.
Not only does NCSB occur before sexual maturity in some cetacean species, NCSB also occurs among individuals who are post-reproductive. For example, female short-finned pilot whales (Globicephala macrorhynchus), which have a post-reproductive phase of their life (Acevedo-Gutiérrez 2018) and live in mixed sex and age, mid-sized pods (Fox et al. 2017), were found to have spermatozoa in their reproductive tract, postmortem (Kasuya et al. 1993). This suggests that although the females were no longer reproducing, they were still involved in sexual activity (Kasuya et al. 1993). The complex social groupings of short-finned pilot whales might explain the use of NCSB in non-reproductive females if they are employing NCSB to manage social relations.
In some killer whale (Orcinus orca) populations, differing matrilines/pods congregate seasonally when males of differing ages from different pods join, forming a temporary all-male group (Bagemihl 1999; Baird 2000). Once formed, the males engage in energetic NCSB. Around 90% of the observed male-male NCSB is reciprocal and includes turn-taking of genital rubbing (Bisther and Vongraven 1995; Bagemihl 1999). Despite the formation of all male pods of dissimilar ages, “adolescent” killer whales (12–25 years old) engage in these behaviors the most (Bagemihl 1999; Baird 2000). Individuals have partner preferences, interacting with the same conspecific year after year (Bagemihl 1999). More recently, an anecdotal report describes a mature and immature male engaging in genital-genital rubbing, with penile erections, in reciprocal manner (Sanvito and Galimberti 2022). In managed care facilities, reciprocation in killer whales is also observed, and it is seemingly used in managing social relations (Sánchez-Hernández et al. 2019). For killer whales, it seems that NCSB is being used as “social glue” (see Bailey and Zuk 2009) not only between members of the same pod but also among pods that coinhabit the same area.
It seems that NCSB is used by many cetacean species as a greeting behavior in brief meetings with other pods and even between different species (Saayman and Tayler 1979; Würsig and Würsig 1979, 1980; Heimlich-Boran 1988; Bisther and Vongraven 1995; Rendell and Whitehead 2001; Dudzinski 2010; Dudzinski et al. 2010; Nakamura and Sakai 2014; Würsig and Pearson 2014). NCSB-driven greeting rituals may be used as a way to evaluate the physical ability of the novel pod members as occurs in some primates and rodents (Pellis and Iwaniuk 1999; Smith et al. 1999). More observations of social group meetings and reunions are necessary to further investigate the role of NCSB as ritual greetings. Similarly, when animals living in managed care facilities are moved from one facility to another, researchers/veterinarians/animal care staff should assess if NCSB is employed when animals are first introduced to one another, although this could also be a display of dominance.
To further understand the function of NCSB with respect to dominance, bonding, and other social functions of NCSB, more detailed analyses are needed, where observers note the partners involved and the results of behaviors. Given the high frequency of occurrence and prevalence across cetacean species (Fig. 7.1), NCSB is likely a very important aspect of cetacean social behavior.
7.4.2 Learning
NCSB might be used to practice general motor skills (D’Agostino et al. 2017), especially during sensitive periods of development (Byers 1998), and has also been suggested to be of potential importance for successful conceptive behavior later in life (Fairbanks 2002; Mann 2006), which may be more challenging in the three-dimensional aquatic environment. While empirical evidence of sexually immature animals engaging in NCSB to practice copulatory behavior is limited, this has been suggested for many species (beluga whales; Glabicky et al. 2010; Hill and Ramirez 2014; Hill et al. 2015; Lilley et al. 2020; Manitzas Hill et al. 2022; right whales (Eubalaena spp.); Thomas and Taber 1984; Kraus and Hatch 2001; Parks et al. 2007; D’Agostino et al. 2017; killer whales; Baird 2000; harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena); Keener et al. 2018; spinner dolphins; Estrade and Dulau 2017; bottlenose dolphins; Scott et al. 2005; Connor and Mann 2006; Kuczaj et al. 2006; Mann 2006; Kuczaj and Eskelinen 2014; Delfour et al. 2017; Harvey et al. 2017). The often-playful expression of NCSB may help fine-tune and enhance an individual’s ability to copulate. It may be the case that engaging in NCSB play is essential to learning how to copulate. In flies (Drosophila spp.), the individuals that engaged in same-sex NCSB had a higher copulatory success rate (McRobert and Tompkins 1988) demonstrating the importance of NCSB. Turtles (Chrysemys, Graptemys, Pseudemys, and Trachemys) also engage in precocious NCSB, which supports that this form of “play” occurs across many taxa (reviewed by Burghardt 2005). Mann (2006) suggests that this “practice may be more important in dolphins than terrestrial mammals because cetaceans are constantly in motion and females can easily turn belly-up or away from males during mating attempts” (p. 126).
To understand how important engaging in NCSB from a young age to learn and practice copulatory behavior requires further observational evidence. For example, comparing the frequency and form of NCSB as a sexually immature individual to how many offspring an individual has may provide some evidence on how important early NCSB experiences are. Immature male beluga whales with access to sexually mature males develop their sexual repertoire faster than those who did not have access to mature males (Ham et al. 2022). This variation in development does not confirm whether those beluga whales will be more successful in future copulatory behavior, but it suggests there is an element of learning involved. For populations where the life history of individuals is known (e.g., managed care facility beluga populations, bottlenose dolphins in Shark Bay), we suggest that the frequency of NCSB and the copulatory success rate be explored in tandem to determine if NCSB is learned and if the individuals who engage in more NCSB are more successful in copulatory behavior.
7.4.3 Pleasure
Another potential reason cetaceans engage in NCSB is that such behavior is pleasurable (Dudzinski et al. 2012). Whether it be masturbation on an inanimate surface or by rubbing on a conspecific, cetaceans likely experience a pleasurable sensation (Brennan et al. 2022). This does not exclude the possibility of adaptive functions. For example, the behavior might function to regulate dominance or manage social relations while also pleasurable and rewarding. However, the most obvious indication that this behavior may be pleasurable comes from observing cetaceans engaging in masturbation by themselves even though social partners are available.
Masturbation or genital rubbing has been described in toothed whales (McBride and Hebb 1948; McBride and Kritzler 1951; Spotte 1967; Caldwell and Caldwell 1977; Shane et al. 1986; Caldwell et al. 1989; Boede et al. 2018) and in baleen whales (Herman et al. 1980; Glockner-Ferrari and Ferrari 1985) and can even lead to ejaculation (Terry 1984). While most typically described in males—likely due to the obvious nature of the behavior, especially when the animal has a penile erection—females have also been observed masturbating (McBride and Kritzler 1951). A number of anecdotal reports describe female bottlenose dolphins engaging in a myriad of genital stimulation activities, including walls, objects, water, and each other (M. Sakai, personal communication, The Dolphin Company, Dolphin Quest). Bottlenose dolphin females possess a highly innervated and highly sensitive clitoris, suggesting that female masturbation and other NCSB are pleasurable (Brennan et al. 2022).
7.4.4 Play
If NCSB is performed in a playful context, it may be pleasurable and “fun” because it is cognitively stimulating (Kuczaj and Eskelinen 2014; Serres and Delfour 2017) and may even serve as a good indicator of positive welfare in both wild and managed care settings (Held and Špinka 2011; Ahloy-Dallaire et al. 2018). Many cetaceans engage in sexual play with others, also called “socio-sexual behavior” within the literature, although it should be classified as a type of play behavior (e.g., McBride and Hebb 1948; Brown and Norris 1956; Sauer 1963; Xian et al. 2010; Würsig 2018; Soriano Jimenez et al. 2021). These sexual play behaviors, most frequently reported in young animals (Thomas and Taber 1984; Mann 2006; Parks et al. 2007; Lilley et al. 2020; Manitzas Hill et al. 2022, this book), seem to be mostly exhibited in a social context where two or more animals incorporate aspects of their sexual repertoire (Table 7.2) into their rough-and-tumble play. It seems that cetaceans also incorporate sexual play in social or cooperative object play (Entiauspe-Neto et al. 2022). However, animals also engage in sexual play with objects in non-social contexts (Martin et al. 2008; Araújo and Wang 2012; Hill et al. 2015, da Silva and Spinelli 2023, this book).
Detailed studies of socio-sexual play in beluga whales (e.g., Hill et al. 2015; Lilley et al. 2020; Ham et al. 2022) and bottlenose dolphins (e.g., Mann 2006; Mackey et al. 2014) have revealed that the play of sexually immature animals influences social bonding and that there are sex differences in both the behaviors observed and the frequency in which males and females engage in sexual play. For beluga whales, sexual behaviors developed in a piece-meal fashion (Ham et al. 2022), with simpler behaviors (e.g., genital rubs) emerging before more complex behavior patterns (e.g., thrusting). Further, female and male immature beluga whales prefer to play with older males when engaging in NCSB, but prefer to play with same-age and -sex partners when engaging in non-sexual rough-and-tumble play (Ham et al. 2023). While sexually immature NCSB may be “fun,” it the form of this sexual play suggests it might also be used in learning or practicing copulatory behaviors.
7.5 Why Sexualize a Social Behavior?
NCSB does not appear to serve just one function for any one cetacean species. The use of NCSB is widespread and can be used as communication (Gaskin 1982; Tyack 2000), self-pleasure (Dudzinski et al. 2012), dominance (Östman 1991; Mann 2006; Wu et al. 2010; Furuichi et al. 2014), or as a type of play (Dudzinski 1998; Mann 2006; Hill and Campbell 2014; D’Agostino et al. 2017). The combination of functions NCSB might serve for any given cetacean species depends on sociality and conceptive behavior strategy, among other factors such as age, sex, and species. Although the overall behavioral repertoire might look similar, the underlying mechanisms and functionality appear variable. This variability is likely greatly influenced by the overall sociality of the cetacean species itself (Fox et al. 2017). For species that live in large pods, there is a greater opportunity for NCSB to occur, and NCSB may be less costly as there are multiple opportunities for reproduction. However, both conditions likely facilitate the increasingly diverse functions of the behavior. In contrast, relatively solitary whales, such as gray whales, may only engage in NCSB/NCSB during specific times of the year when they aggregate in social groups, such as during the mating season (Gilmore 1960; Swartz 1986). Species differences must be considered when trying to make sense of the functions of NCSB, if any.
One of the biggest questions that results from studying NCSB is, what value is added by sexualizing a social interaction? Why add a sexual component to social behaviors that could be otherwise devoid of sex? Despite there not being a concrete answer for cetaceans at this time, the following hypotheses can be formed: (1) NCSB allows for specific social bonding that other forms of contact do not, specifically in fission/fusion societies, where bonds have to be re-established quickly, it may be more effective than other social interactions that are devoid of sex; (2) NCSB is necessary for both learning and practicing in order to reproduce later; and (3) NCSB is associated with immediate sexual reward (i.e., pleasure). Bailey and Zuk (2009) provide a number of explanations for why same-sex NCSB has been adaptive for many diverse species; for example, flies engage in NSCB to practice sexual behavior, and American bison (Bison bison) use NCSB to manage intrasexual conflict. More recently, Monk et al. (2019) posited that same-sex NCSB is not the evolutionary paradox it was once thought to be. For cetaceans, NCSB, and specifically same-sex NCSB, is quite prevalent and could be due to a number of explanations. To Monk et al.’s (2019) point, this behavior seems characteristic of many species and a normal occurrence, even though it was not scientifically documented until relatively recently.
NCSB is an important part of many cetacean species’ behavioral repertoire, comprising a substantial portion of their daily lives (e.g., Lilley et al. 2020). NCSB is important to study for exactly this reason. Although not directly used for reproduction, these behaviors can still be used to satisfy social demands. By understanding NCSB, we further our understanding of reproductive behavior and social relationships in non-human species (Vasey 1995; Bailey and Zuk 2009; Xian et al. 2010).
7.6 Conservation, Welfare, and Future Research
Beyond the basic science to better understand animal behavior, understanding NCSB can affect conservation and welfare in several ways. For example, there is evidence that for some species, individuals had better reproductive success if they participated in NCSB prior to sexual maturity (e.g., Drosophila spp., McRobert and Tompkins 1988). If practice is necessary for successful offspring production or practice makes an individual more reproductively successful, individuals with access to the appropriate setting for NCSB (e.g., social group composition) would have a fitness advantage. Although paternity success as the result of NCSB prevalence has yet to be examined in many cetacean species, evidence in beluga whales points to the gradual development of the socio-sexual repertoire (Lilley et al. 2020; Ham et al. 2022). Specifically, behaviors non-essential for reproduction, such as genital rubs, were present early in life, but pelvic thrusts were not commonly part of the NCSB repertoire until beluga whales were sexually immature.
The exact social composition conducive to NCSB needs to be examined in further research and might vary by species. For example, young beluga whales were most likely to participate in NCSB when other young, and mostly male, conspecifics were present (Lilley et al. 2020), and sexually mature male beluga whales are most likely to engage in NCSB with other sexually mature males (Glabicky et al. 2010). If sexually mature males serve as role models for NCSB, even only occasionally, then social group composition might be very important for the continuation of endangered cetacean populations or species. Anecdotal observations have reported that sexually immature male bottlenose dolphins (T. truncatus) watch sexually mature males engage in a variety of attention-getting behavior in the presence of interested sexually mature females, supporting the hypothesis of mentoring in some species of odontocetes (personal communication, K. Dudzinski). For example, small populations of killer whales with seasonal breeding congregations may particularly benefit from NCSB if it indirectly enhances survival or reproductive potential.
Aside from conservation issues, the social welfare of some species may be enhanced by opportunities to engage in NCSB. In cetacean species that form long-term bonds with certain individuals (e.g., alliance formation in bottlenose dolphins), engaging in NCSB may facilitate those bonds, increase group cohesion, and provide social welfare benefits. NCSB may also help alliances form and therefore also increases reproductive fitness by contributing to the reproductive success of the male dolphins in alliances. At least for bottlenose dolphins, welfare appears to vary by access to and engagement with conspecifics (Clegg and Delfour 2018). This relationship could be tested in other species to determine the extent to which NCSB might impact social well-being.
7.7 Conclusions
Overall, there is much work to be done on the topic of NCSB in cetaceans. For many cetacean species, it is unknown if NCSB is exhibited at all, and for many of the species in which NCSB has been documented, there has yet to be a systematic study of ontogeny, repertoire, welfare benefits, or fitness benefits. The work thus far has provided evidence that NCSB is common and is also more important than simply an exaptation of reproductive behavior. Further, with the knowledge that many species engage in NCSB, researchers should aim to move beyond post hoc attribution of socio-sexual functions and work toward rigorous hypothesis testing to determine if NCSB is truly NCSB and has adaptive functions (Vasey 1995).
While we have attempted to provide discrete categories as to the function of NCSB to explain why cetaceans engage this behavior, our suggestions are likely over-simplified (Table 7.1). It is most plausible that for many species, NCSB is often playful—especially when sexually immature—but aids in social bond formation (with peers, their mother, and others) and social relation management. It is reinforced by the pleasurable nature of NCSB and, ultimately, improves reproductive outcomes, especially when the NCSB mirrors copulatory behavior patterns. With new observation techniques, such as drone recording and autonomous surface vehicles (reviewed by Whitt et al. 2020) and animals in managed care facilities, these studies are possible and should be explored, especially in those species that have been reported previously to engage in NCSB.
References
Acevedo-Gutiérrez A (2018) Group behavior. In: Würsig B, Thewissen JGM, Kovacs K (eds) Encyclopedia of marine mammals, 3rd edn. Academic Press, London, p 428
Ahloy-Dallaire J, Espinosa J, Mason G (2018) Play and optimal welfare: does play indicate the presence of positive affective states? Behav Process 156:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.11.011
Araújo CC, Wang JY (2012) Botos (Inia geoffrensis) in the upper reaches of the Tocantins River (Central Brazil) with observations of unusual behavior, including object carrying. Aqua Mamm 38:435–440. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.38.4.2012.435
Arnold C, Matthews LJ, Nunn CL (2010) The 10kTrees website: a new online resource for primate phylogeny. Evol Anthropol 19:114–118
Bagemihl B (1999) Biological exuberance: animal homosexuality and natural diversity. St. Martin’s Press, New York, NY
Bailey NW, Zuk M (2009) Same-sex sexual behavior and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:439–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.014
Baird RW (2000) The killer whale: foraging specializations and group hunting. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 127–153
Bisther A, Vongraven D (1995) Studies of the social ecology of Norwegian killer whales (Orcinus orca). Dev Mar Biol 4:169–176
Boede EO, Mujica-Jorquera E, Boede F, Varela C (2018) Reproductive management of the Orinoco River dolphin Inia geoffrensis humboldtiana in Venezuela. Int Zoo Yearb 52:245–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/izy.12195
Brennan PLR, Cowart JR, Orbach DN (2022) Evidence of a functional clitoris in dolphins. Curr Biol 32:R24–R26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.020
Brown DH, Norris KS (1956) Observations of captive and wild cetaceans. J Mamm 37:311–326. https://doi.org/10.1644/870.1.Key
Burghardt GM (2005) The genesis of animal play: testing the limits. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Byers JA (1998) Biological effects of locomotor play: getting into shape, or something more specific? In: Bekoff M, Byers JA (eds) Animal play. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 205–220
Caldwell MC, Caldwell DK (1977) Social interactions and reproduction in the Atlantic bottlenosed dolphin. In: Ridgway S, Benirscke KW (eds) Breeding dolphins: present status, suggestions for the future. National Technical Information Service PB-273673. U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, pp 133–142
Caldwell MC, Caldwell DK, Brill RL (1989) Inia geoffrensis in captivity in the United States. In: Perrin WF, Brownell RLJ, Kaiya Z, Jiankang L (eds) Biology and conservation of river dolphins. Occas Pap IUCN Spec Surv Commn 3:35–41
Clegg ILK, Delfour F (2018) Cognitive judgement bias is associated with frequency of anticipatory behavior in bottlenose dolphins. Zoo Biol 37:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21400
Connor R, Mann J (2006) Social cognition in the wild: Machiavellian dolphins? In: Hurley S, Nudds M (eds) Rational animals? Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 329–368
Connor RC, Smolker RA, Richards AF (1992) Two levels of alliance formation among male bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). Proc Natl Acad Sci 89:987–990. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.3.987
Connor RC, Wells RS, Mann J, Read AJ (2000) The bottlenose dolphin: social relationships in a fission-fusion society. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 91–126
Connor RC, Heithaus MR, Barre LM (2001) Complex social structure, alliance stability and mating access in a bottlenose dolphin ‘super-alliance’. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:263–267. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1357
Connor RC, Smolker R, Bejder L (2006) Synchrony, social behaviour and alliance affiliation in Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops aduncus. Anim Behav 72:1371–1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.03.014
Connor RC, Krützen M, Allen SJ, Sherwin WB, King SL (2022) Strategic intergroup alliances increase access to a contested resource in male bottlenose dolphins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 119:e2121723119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2121723119
D’Agostino VC, Fioramonti A, Varsky F, Campos C, Goity JM, Degrati M (2017) Nonreproductive sexual behavior in baleen whales: sexual harassment by an adult male on a calf in southern right whales (Eubalaena australis). Aqua Mamm 43:213–218. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.43.2.2017.213
da Silva VMF, Spinelli LG (2023) Play, sexual display, or just boredom relief? In: Würsig B, Orbach DN (eds) Sex in cetaceans. Springer Nature, Cham
Delfour F, Faulkner C, Carter T (2017) Object manipulation and play behaviour in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) under human care. Int J Comp Psych 30:1–22
Donnelly BG (1967) Observations on the mating behavior of the southern right whale Eubalaena australis. S Afr J Sci 63:176–181
Dudzinski KM (1998) Contact behavior and signal exchange in Atlantic spotted dolphins (Stenella frontalis). Aqua Mamm 24:129–142
Dudzinski KM (2010) Overlap between information gained from complementary and comparative studies of captive and wild dolphins. Int J Comp Psych 23:566–586
Dudzinski KM, Sakai M, Masaki K, Kogi K, Hishii T, Kurimoto M (2003) Behavioural observations of bottlenose dolphins towards two dead conspecifics. Aqua Mamm 29:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1578/016754203101023951
Dudzinski KM, Gregg JD, Paulos RD, Kuczaj SA (2010) A comparison of pectoral fin contact behaviour for three distinct dolphin populations. Behav Process 84:559–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.02.013
Dudzinski KM, Gregg J, Melillo-Sweeting K, Seay B, Levengood A, Kuczaj SA (2012) Tactile contact exchanges between dolphins: self-rubbing versus inter-individual contact in three species from three geographies. Int J Comp Psych 25:21–43
Entiauspe-Neto OM, Reichle S, dos Rios A (2022) A case of playful interaction between Bolivian River dolphins with a Beni anadconda. Ecology 103(8):e3724. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3724
Estrade V, Dulau V (2017) First case of spinner dolphin (Stenella longirostris) infanticide off Reunion Island: necropsy’s findings and post mortem inter-species interactions. Oceanogr Fish Open Access J 3:1–20. https://doi.org/10.19080/OFOAJ.2017.03.555615
Fairbanks LA (2002) Juvenile vervet monkeys: establishing relationships and practicing skills for the future. In: Pereira ME, Fairbanks LA (eds) Juvenile primates: life history, development and behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 211–227
Fox KCR, Muthukrishna M, Shultz S (2017) The social and cultural roots of whale and dolphin brains. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1699–1705. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0336-y
Furuichi T, Connor R, Hashimoto C (2014) Non-conceptive sexual interactions in monkeys, apes, and dolphins. Springer Japan, Tokyo
Gaskin DE (1982) The ecology of whales and dolphins. Heinemann, London
Gilmore G (1960) A census of the California gray whale. In: Rice DW (ed) Issue 342 of special scientific report: fisheries. U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
Glabicky N, DuBrava A, Noonan M (2010) Social-sexual behavior seasonality in captive beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas). Polar Biol 33:1145–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-010-0790-3
Glockner-Ferrari DA, Ferrari MJ (1985) Individual indentification, behavior, reproduction, and distribution of humpback whale, Megaptera novaengliae, in Hawai’i. US Mar Mamm Commn
Grimes C, Brent LJN, Weiss MN, Franks DW, Balcomb KC, Ellifrit DK, Ellis S, Croft DP (2022) The effect of age, sex, and resource abundance on patterns of rake markings in resident killer whales (Orcinus orca). Mar Mamm Sci 38:941. https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12908
Grueter CC, Stoinski TS (2016) Homosexual behavior in female mountain gorillas: reflection of dominance, affiliation, reconciliation or arousal? PLoS One 11:e0154185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154185
Gunst N, Leca J-B, Vasey PL (2013) Development of sexual and socio-sexual behaviours in free-ranging juvenile male Japanese macaques, Macaca fuscata. Behaviour 150:1225–1254. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003088
Gunst N, Vasey PL, Leca J-B (2018) Deer mates: a quantitative study of heterospecific sexual behaviors performed by Japanese macaques toward Sika deer. Arch Sex Behav 47:847–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1129-8
Gunst N, Casarrubea M, Vasey PL, Leca J-B (2020) Is female-male mounting functional? An analysis of the temporal patterns of sexual behaviors in Japanese macaques. Physiol Behav 223:112983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112983
Ham JR, Lilley MK, Manitzas Hill HM (2021a) Conspecific scarring on wild belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) in Cunningham Inlet. Behaviour 158:663–683. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-bja10086
Ham JR, Lilley MK, Miller MR, Manitzas Hill HM (2021b) Seasonality of social behaviour among immature belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) in managed care. Polar Res 40:5498. https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v40.5498
Ham JR, Lilley MK, Lelekach J, Miller MR, Robeck TR, Pellis SM, Manitzas Hill HM (2022) The emergence and development of socio-sexual behavior in beluga calves (Delphinapterus leucas). Behav Process 200:104695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104695
Ham JR, Lilley MK, Winchenski RJ, Miranda J, Velarde Dediós ÁG, Kolodziej K, Pellis SM, Manitzas Hill HM (2023) Playful mouth-to-mouth interactions of belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) in managed care. Zoo Biol. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21788
Harvey BS, Dudzinski KM, Kuczaj SA (2017) Associations and the role of affiliative, agonistic, and socio-sexual behaviors among common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Behav Process 135:145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.013
Heimlich-Boran JR (1988) Behavioral ecology of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the Pacific Northwest. Can J Zool 66:565–578. https://doi.org/10.1139/z88-084
Held SDE, Špinka M (2011) Animal play and animal welfare. Anim Behav 81:891–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.01.007
Herman L, Baker C, Forestell P, Antinoja R (1980) Right whale Balaena glacialis sightings near Hawai'i: a clue to the wintering grounds? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2:271–275. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps002271
Hill HM, Campbell CA (2014) The frequency and nature of allocare by a group of belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) in human care. Int J Comp Psych 27:501–514. https://doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.2014.27.04.08
Hill H, Ramirez D (2014) Adults play but not like their young: the frequency and types of play by belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) in human care. Anim Behav Cogn 1:166–185. https://doi.org/10.12966/abc.05.07.2014
Hill HM, Artz S, Lopez M (2014) Sex, love, or war? A representation of 20 years of research on the social interactions of animals. Int J Comp Psych 27:50–68
Hill HM, Dietrich S, Yeater D, McKinnon M, Miller M, Aibel S, Dove A (2015) Developing a catalog of socio-sexual behaviors of beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas). Anim Behav Cogn 2:105–123. https://doi.org/10.12966/abc.05.01.2015
Hohmann G, Fruth B (2000) Use and function of genital contacts among female bonobos. Anim Behav 60:107–120. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1451
Johnson CM, Norris KS (1994) Social behavior. In: Norris KS, Würsig B, Wells RS, Würsig M (eds) The Hawaiian spinner dolphin. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 243–286
Kasuya T, Marsh H, Amino A (1993) Non-reproductive mating in short-finned pilot whales. Rep Int Whal Commn Spec Iss 14:425–437
Keener W, Webber MA, Szczepaniak ID, Markowitz TM, Orbach DN (2018) The sex life of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena): lateralized and aerial behavior. Aqua Mamm 44:620–632. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.44.6.2018.620
Kincaid ALD, Lovewell GN, Allen JB, Bassos-Hull K, Blackburn JL, Hazelkorn RA, Wells RS (2022) Necrocoitus in common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) near Sarasota, Florida. Aqua Mamm 48:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.48.6.2022.693
Klemm WR, Sherry CJ, Schake LM, Sis RF (1983) Homosexual behavior in feedlot steers: an aggression hypothesis. Appl Anim Ethol 11:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(83)90127-X
Kotrschal K, Hemetsberger J, Weiß B (2006) Making the best of a bad sitation: homosociality in male greylag geese. In: Sommer V, Vasey PL (eds) Homosexual behaviour in animals: an evolutionary perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 46–76
Kraus SD, Hatch JJ (2001) Mating strategies in the North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis). J Cetacean Res Manag 2:237–244
Kuczaj SA, Eskelinen HC (2014) Why do dolphins play? Anim Behav Cogn 1:113–127. https://doi.org/10.12966/abc.05.03.2014
Kuczaj SA, Makecha R, Trone M, Paulos RD, Ramos JA (2006) Role of peers in cultural innovation and cultural transmission: evidence from the play of dolphin calves. Int J Comp Psych 19:223–240
Lee HH, Wallen MM, Krzyszczyk E, Mann J (2019) Every scar has a story: age and sex-specific conflict rates in wild bottlenose dolphins. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 73:63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2674-z
Lilley MK, Ham JR, Hill HM (2020) The development of socio-sexual behavior in belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) under human care. Behav Process 171:104025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.104025
Lilley MK, Ham JR, Miller MR, Kolodziej K, Hill HMM (2022) Investigation of lateralization of socio-sexual behavior in belugas (Delphinapterus leucas). Behav Process 201:104718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104718
Lilley MK, Ham JR, Hill HMM (2022) Observations of courtship in belugas (Delphinapterus leucas). Aqua Mamm 48(6):547–552. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.48.6.2022.547
Lonati GL, Hynes NJ, Howe KR, Durette-Morin D, Brown MW, Davies KTA (2022) Observations of adult-calf nonreproductive copulatory behavior in North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis). Aqua Mamm 48:639–645. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.48.6.2022.639
Mackey AD, Makecha RN, Kuczaj SA (2014) The development of social play in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Anim Behav Cogn 1:19–35. https://doi.org/10.12966/abc.02.02.2014
Manitzas Hill HM, Ham JR, Lilley MK (2022) Observations of mating practice by non-sexually mature male belugas (Delphinapterus leucas). Aqua Mamm 48:541–546. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.48.6.2022.541
Manitzas HM, Ortiz N, Ham JR (2023) Social games that belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) play. Int J Play 12:81. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2022.2152536
Mann J (2006) Establishing trust: socio-sexual behaviour and the development of male-male bonds among Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. In: Sommer V, Vasey PL (eds) Homosexual behaviour in animals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 107–130
Martin AR, Da Silva VMF, Rothery P (2008) Object carrying as socio-sexual display in an aquatic mammal. Biol Lett 4:243–245. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0067
McBride AF, Hebb DO (1948) Behavior of the captive bottle-nose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus. J Comp Physiol Psych 41:111–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057927
McBride AF, Kritzler H (1951) Observations on pregnancy, parturition, and postnatal behavior in the bottlenose dolphin. J Mamm 32:251. https://doi.org/10.2307/1375657
McRobert SP, Tompkins L (1988) Two consequences of homosexual courtship performed by Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila affinis males. Evolution 42:1093. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408925
Monk JD, Giglio E, Kamath A, Lambert MR, McDonough CE (2019) An alternative hypothesis for the evolution of same-sex sexual behaviour in animals. Nat Ecol Evol 3:1622–1631. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1019-7
Nakamura M, Sakai M (2014) Social touch in apes and dolphins. In: Yamagiwa J, Karczmarski L (eds) Primates and cetaceans: field research and conservation of complex mammalian societies. Springer, Tokyo, pp 355–383
Norris KS, Dohl TP (1980) Behavior of the Hawaiian spinner dolphin, Stenella longirostris. Fish Bull 77:821–849
Ogawa H (2006) Wily monkeys: social intelligence of Tibetan macaques. TransPacific Press, Melbourne
Orbach DN, Eaton J, Fiori L, Piwetz S, Weir JS, Würsig M, Würsig B (2020) Mating patterns of dusky dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obscurus) explored using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Mar Mamm Sci 36(4):1097–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12695
Östman J (1991) Changes in aggressive and homosexual behavior among two male bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in a captive colony. In: Pryor K, Norris KS (eds) Dolphin societies: discoveries and puzzles. The University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 304–317
Pack AA, Herman LM, Craig AS, Spitz SS, Deakos MH (2002) Penis extrusions by humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). Aqua Mamm 28:131–146
Parks SE, Brown MW, Conger LA, Hamilton PK, Knowlton AR, Kraus SD, Slay CK, Tyack PL (2007) Occurrence, composition, and potential functions of North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) surface active groups. Mar Mamm Sci 23:868–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.00154.x
Pellis SM, Iwaniuk AN (1999) The problem of adult play fighting: a comparative analysis of play and courtship in primates. Ethology 105:783–806. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00457.x
R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Rambaut A (2018) FigTree. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
Ramos EA, Hartman KL, Baird RW, Lerma JK, Rodríguez-González FM, Orbach DN (2023) Drone perspectives on cetacean mating and sex. In: Würsig B, Orbach DN (eds) Sex in cetaceans. Springer Nature, Cham
Rendell L, Whitehead H (2001) Culture in whales and dolphins. Behav Brain Sci 24:309–324. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0100396X
Saayman GS, Tayler CK (1979) The socioecology of humpback dolphins (Sousa sp.). In: Winn HE, Olla BL (eds) The behaviour of marine animals, vol 3. Plenun Press, New York, NY, pp 165–226
Sánchez-Hernández P, Krasheninnikova A, Almunia J, Molina-Borja M (2019) Social interaction analysis in captive orcas (Orcinus orca). Zoo Biol 38:323–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21502
Sanvito S, Galimberti F (2022) Male-male sexual interactions between an adult and a calf killer whale (Orcinus orca) of the Falkland Islands. Aqua Mamm 48:759–763. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.48.6.2022.759
Sauer EGF (1963) Courtship and copulation of the gray whale in the Bering Sea at St. Lawrence Island. Alaska. Psych Forsch 27:157–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00421840
Scott EM, Mann J, Watson-Capps JJ, Sargeant BL, Connor RC (2005) Aggression in bottlenose dolphins: evidence for sexual coercion, male-male competition, and female tolerance through analysis of tooth-rake marks and behaviour. Behaviour 142:21–44. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539053627712
Serres A, Delfour F (2017) Environmental changes and anthropogenic factors modulate social play in captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Zoo Biol 36:99–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21355
Serres A, Hao Y, Wang D (2021) Socio-sexual interactions in captive finless porpoises and bottlenose dolphins. Mar Mamm Sci 38:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12887
Shane SH, Wells RS, Würsig B (1986) Ecology, behavior and social organization of the bottlenose dolphin: a review. Mar Mamm Sci 2:34–63
Smith LK, Fantella S-LN, Pellis SM (1999) Playful defensive responses in adult male rats depend on the status of the unfamiliar opponent. Aggress Behav 25:141–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:2<141::AID-AB6>3.0.CO;2-S
Smuts BB, Watanabe JM (1990) Social relationships and ritualized greetings in adult male baboons (Papio cynocephalus anubis). Int J Primatol 11:147–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02192786
Soriano Jimenez AI, Drago M, Vinyoles D, Maté C (2021) Play behavior in two captive bottlenose dolphin calves (Tursiops truncatus): ethogram, ontogeny, and individual differences. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 24:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2021.1902811
Spotte SH (1967) Intergeneric behavior between captive Amazon river dolphins Inia and Sotalia. Underw Nat 4:9–13
Swartz SL (1986) Gray whale migratory, social and breeding behavior. Rep Int Whal Commn Spec Iss 8:207–229
Terry RP (1984) Intergeneric behavior between Sotalia fluviatilis guianensis and Tursiops truncatus in captivity. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkd 49:290–299
Thomas PO, Taber SM (1984) Mother-infant interaction and behavioral development in Southern right whales, Eubalaena australis. Behaviour 88:42–60
Tyack PL (2000) Functional aspects of cetacean communication. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 270–307
Vasey PL (1995) Homosexual behavior in primates: a review of evidence and theory. Int J Primatol 16:173–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735477
Wells RS (1984) Reproductive behavior and hormonal correlates in Hawaiian spinner dolphins, Stenella longirostris. In: Perrin WF, Brownell RL Jr, DP DM (eds) Reproduction on whales, dolphins, and porpoises. Rep Int Whal Commn Spec Iss 6:465–472
Whitt C, Pearlman J, Polagye B, Caimi F, Muller-Karger F, Copping A, Spence H, Madhusudhana S, Kirkwood W, Grosjean L, Fiaz BM, Singh S, Sing S, Manalang D, Gupta AS, Maguer A, Buck JJH, Marouchos A, Atmanand MA, Venkatesan R, Narayanaswamy V, Testor P, Douglas E, de Halleux S, Khalsa SJ (2020) Future vision for autonomous ocean observations. Front Mar Sci 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00697
Wickler W (1967) Socio-sexual signals and their intra-specific imitation among primates. In: Morris D (ed) Primate ethology. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, pp 69–147
Wu H-P, Hao Y-J, Yu X-Y, Xian Y-J, Zhao Q-Z, Chen D-Q, Kuang X-A, Kou Z-B, Feng K-K, Gong W-M, Wang D (2010) Variation in sexual behaviors in a group of captive male Yangtze finless porpoises (Neophocaena phocaenoides asiaeorientalis): motivated by physiological changes? Theriogenology 74:1467–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.06.018
Würsig B (2018) Playful behavior. In: Würsig B, Thewissen JGM, Kovacs K (eds) Encyclopedia of marine mammals, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 741–743
Würsig B, Pearson HC (2014) Dusky dolphins: flexibility in foraging and social strategies. In: Yamagiwa J, Karczmarski L (eds) Primates and cetaceans: field research and conservation of complex mammalian societies. Springer Japan, Tokyo, pp 25–42
Würsig B, Würsig M (1979) Behavior and ecology of the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus, in the South Atlantic. Fish Bull 2:399–412
Würsig B, Würsig M (1980) Behavior and ecology of the dusky dolphin, Lagenorhynchus obscurus, in the South Atlantic. Fish Bull 77:871–890
Xian Y, Wang K, Dong L, Hao Y, Wang D (2010) Some observations on the sociosexual behavior of a captive male Yangtze finless porpoise calf (Neophocaena phocaenoides asiaeorientalis). Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 43:221–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236244.2010.487300
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Paul Vasey for his comments on this chapter as well as the comments we received from the editors of this book and two external reviewers. We also thank Nichole Ham for her drawings of non-conceptive sexual behavior.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
7.1 Electronic Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
(DOCX 108 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ham, J.R., Lilley, M.K., Manitzas Hill, H.M. (2023). Non-conceptive Sexual Behavior in Cetaceans: Comparison of Form and Function. In: Würsig, B., Orbach, D.N. (eds) Sex in Cetaceans. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35651-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35651-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35650-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35651-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)