Abstract
Forests without significant human intervention are globally uncommon and rapidly declining, especially in the temperate biome. These ecosystems provide essential habitat for the conservation of biodiversity, mitigation of climate change and regulation of freshwater ecosystems. Efforts towards mapping intact forests globally have advanced via forest patches as the basic conservation unit. We propose an alternative ecosystem-based perspective that takes into consideration the connection between forests and riverine processes, using small watersheds as the unit of analysis. This chapter assesses the distribution of intact forested watersheds in Patagonia, as a more conservative approach to highlight conservation priorities for both terrestrial and aquatic systems. The study consisted of mapping all catchments in Western Patagonia (41–55°S), followed by a two-stage validation based on satellite images and field observations. We summarize the patterns in their distribution based on categories of land use, bioclimatic gradients, forest types and inclusion within protected areas. Large areas of temperate forest watersheds without major human impacts were documented across much western drainage in Patagonia, potentially representing a globally significant biodiversity refuge. However, observations on terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity in these ecosystems is limited, and since nearly half of these systems are located outside of protected areas, there is an urgent need for general baseline observations on the biodiversity of intact watersheds. The chapter concludes with a summary of the challenges and recommendations for the conservation of intact forested watersheds in western Patagonia.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Keywords
- Patagonia
- Western
- Chile
- Intact watershed
- Temperate forests
- Head-water streams
- Old growth forests
- Conservation
1 Introduction
Temperate forest ecosystems without major human intervention in western Patagonia are a natural treasure and global heritage [7, 79, 115]. Numerous rivers and winding crystalline streams are born in these forests. A closer look reveals that the stream-forest interface is a complex and dynamic zone that is teeming with life. River ecosystems play essential roles in the transport of sediment, rocks, leaves, nutrients and dead wood, demonstrating a close relationship between what happens in the entire watershed, the banks and the watercourse [43, 53]. Considering the importance of water for life, this connection between forest and water is essential for our survival as a society.
Ancient forest ecosystems, scarcely modified by human action, are important due to their capacity to sequester and store carbon [63, 93, 92] and water [36], their role in soil protection and water quality, regulation of hydrological regimes, nutrient cycling and retention [47, 100] and the geomorphology of associated river systems [16, 28, 113]. Due to the global decline in forest area, an increasing number of publications and reports address issues such as the rate of forest cover loss [42, 77], remaining biomass in intact forest landscapes [91], habitat fragmentation levels [29, 30, 41], the human footprint on the landscape [101, 111] and priority areas for conservation and restoration [117]. However, comparable regional-scale studies are generally scarce in Patagonia [90].
As in other regions, major forest losses in western Patagonia are due to human actions such as large fires, timber extraction, cattle ranching, and to a lesser extent, the replacement of forests with plantations of exotic trees and agriculture [15, 40, 77]. These anthropogenic impacts continue to expand, resulting in the decrease of intact forest area [40]. After 100 years of intensive landscape use, Chile’s forest area has suffered significant reductions [6]. It is estimated that most native forests in western Patagonia were still pristine only 100–200 years ago, despite some localized impacts from management by Indigenous people [8, 13, 57]. Despite the losses, Patagonia is home to potentially the largest area worldwide of temperate forests and wetlands without major human intervention and has become a refuge for the biota of these ecosystems [9, 10, 65, 99].
Global-scale forest mapping efforts have advanced in recent years by defining areas of remaining intact forests or landscapes as critical conservation units, and analyzing their size and connectivity [42, 91, 115]. However, the watershed seems to be the most relevant unit for conservation from an ecosystem perspective [45, 61]. Considering the close relationship between forest, water, and fluvial ecosystem in watersheds, it is especially relevant to study the forests of western Patagonia that are intact or with very little human impact, because they represent a global ecological reference condition. The identification and mapping of watersheds with forests displaying very little intervention requires a set of restrictive conditions: a forest ecosystem unaltered by human activity, adjusted to the contour of a watershed whose watershed boundary lines are identifiable up to a downstream drainage point, and without significant human impact along the stream drainage network.
2 Scope and Objectives
The objective of this chapter is to determine the distribution of forest watersheds without any major anthropogenic intervention (Table 1) in the area of western Patagonia stretching from Petrohué River to Tierra del Fuego including Chiloé Island (42–56°S).
We also highlight the conservation value of these terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems, considering their global importance and as a local conservation unit (see Fig. 1 for diagrams that include some typical ecosystem transitions at the terrestrial-aquatic interface in valleys of mountain and coastal basins of western Patagonia).
The results include a map of intact forested watersheds for western Patagonian region (41°42′S, 73°02′W–56°29′S, 68°44°W), followed by an analysis of the distribution of these intact forest watersheds according to land use categories, bioclimatic gradient, forest types and their representation within protected areas (e.g. National System of Protected Wild Areas (in Spanish SNASPE) and private conservation initiatives). Finally, some of the main threats currently facing these forest ecosystem watersheds in the Patagonian region are discussed.
Box 1
What is considered to be an intact/pristine forested watershed in this study?
In this study the intactness or alteration of a forest or watercourse is based on the fact that all environments exhibit varying degrees of human intervention and cannot be treated in absolute values. One view (International Conference: Intact forests of the twenty-first century, University of Oxford, June 2018) that considers landscapes along a gradient of degrees of intervention is:
The concept of intact forested watershed in our study is the watersheds that are closest to presenting a state of no intervention by human beings. In order to arrive at a definition of systems that are “intact” or display “little intervention,” it is necessary to start with a summary of the disturbances that these ecosystems may experience, considering anthropogenic impacts and natural disturbances.
Sometimes natural or anthropogenic disturbances of watersheds (e.g. fires, landslides, geological processes and ecological succession) can even be decoupled from disturbances in the aquatic system within the same watershed (hydrological cycles and events, a river that has a series of disturbances annually or with greater frequency). In light of this, it is evident that the geomorphology, vegetation cover and hydrology of watersheds can be very diverse along the morphological and bioclimatic gradients of the region. Streams and rivers are also diverse in their morphology at various scales, from a few meters (habitat) to hundreds of meters (stretch of the river) to kilometers. This variability sometimes complicates the interpretation of images from mapping. We propose a basic classification system for intact watersheds located in Patagonia, with the following criteria:
-
1.
Absence of evidence of large-scale fires resulting in massive tree mortality and soil transformation, although the effect of low intensity fire on the understory may be less evident in areas near these large fires.
-
2.
No evidence of large-scale logging or harvesting, although selective logging from many years ago is sometimes difficult to identify.
-
3.
No evidence of road construction or of impacts associated with the entry of heavy vehicles, or of streams crossing over these roads, or the generation of areas of impact on soils due to compaction or erosion.
-
4.
No evidence of the effect of intensive livestock pressure such as trail networks, usually shown by the presence of exotic species associated with livestock (clover meadows, etc.), or artificial wetlands and riparian wetlands being altered by cattle hooves trampling them.
In summary, our definition of an intact forest watershed does not mean that there is no human presence. Rather, the fundamental criterion is that there is no evidence of significant impacts on soils (such as erosion, changes in composition), the water network (drainage, dams, channel modification) or vegetation (changes in horizontal and vertical vegetation structure).
There are unavoidable anthropogenic impacts occurring globally, such as the deposition of atmospheric pollutants and climate change. But these effects are most likely moderate to mild in western Patagonia compared to other parts of the world (e.g. areas of lower atmospheric pollution: [44, 88, 87], and an anomaly in terms of climate change [32, 37].
3 Pristine Forest Watersheds in Western Patagonia
3.1 The Watershed as a Conservation Unit
A fundamental issue in conservation ecology is the planning unit: an endangered species, populations with a disjunct distribution (along with their genetic components), uniform, species-rich forest patches, diverse plant communities and ecosystems are frequently used units. The territorial unit used here, the watershed, is another variant that has few examples to date of being implemented in biodiversity conservation plans [1, 68]. One of the most notable advantages of the watershed as a conservation planning unit is that its topographically defined environment also integrates several conservation elements which are usually considered separately. It includes both the forest and its transition to the zone above the vegetation boundary known as the alpine zone, the riparian zone ecotone, and the aquatic systems as a whole. Not just the river or stream, but the overall water network that feeds the main river and the system that regulates the effects of precipitation events in the river. It involves species, and also a landscape that better encapsulates the possibilities of movement and the set of interactions between species; this is unlike a patch of forest or the arbitrary boundaries of a park or forest reserve. For example, in the watershed there is an altitudinal gradient that includes the ecotones between forest, water and wetland, which may be relevant for the distribution of species sensitive to environmental changes [21, 23, 96] and are equally important for generalist species with wider dispersal ranges. Finally, the above applies both to conservation within a defined space and the downstream effects, connecting diverse ecosystems and human beings.
Given these general criteria as a starting point, watersheds with intact forests (Table 1) are likely to be a much narrower subset, considering only forest area, both in terms of their distribution and area. Assuming that intact watersheds are globally rare and are usually linked to headwater streams that are of great importance in the conservation of biodiversity and downstream ecosystems [1], this intact watershed approach is of enormous value for the global conservation of freshwater systems [62, 102].
3.2 Western Patagonia as a Study Area Based on Its Watersheds
We define western Patagonia as the bioregion of watersheds that originate in the Andes and drain into the Patagonian fjords on the Chilean coast. Our analysis begins in the north in the Petrohué River basin (which discharges at 41.5°S, Los Lagos administrative region), westward to include the island of Chiloé and southward to Cape Horn, 55.91°S. Towards the south it excludes some contiguous forests of Atlantic basins of the Chubut River (north) and Río Grande of Tierra del Fuego to the east (Fig. 2). The area includes the political jurisdictions of the regions of Los Lagos (Palena and Chiloé provinces), Aysén and Magallanes in Chile, and the provinces of Chubut, Santa Cruz and Tierra del Fuego in Argentina. The maximum altitude in the entire region is Mount San Valentín, at 3910 m. The linear distances of river courses from the source to the sea are relatively short, with altitudinal gradients and steep river slopes. The study area includes some of the largest ice fields in the temperate zone: the Northern Ice Field, Southern Ice Field and Darwin Range [97], as well as some of the largest lakes in South America and deepest in the world. Trans-Andean basins are an important feature of the rivers of southern Patagonia, with westward drainage of the Puelo, Yelcho, Palena, Aysén and Baker rivers, while the drainage of the Rio Grande in Tierra del Fuego is eastward through Argentina to the Atlantic Ocean. Small coastal rivers abound in a continental region dominated by extensive fjords and islands (approximately 60% of the Chilean area, Fig. 2, with significant runoff despite the small size of their watersheds. A main characteristic of the region is the strong climatic gradient from west to east, with hyper-humid coastal systems and extreme annual precipitation (>6000 mm/year, to dry and cold steppe systems (<250 mm/year; [94]). The hydrographs of Patagonian rivers vary according to origin, from cold steppes with peak flows from September to October, mountain snowmelt with peak flows from November to December, glacial melt streams with peak flows from January to February, to coastal temperate forest systems with no consistent hydrographs and pulses occurring at any time of the year. The occurrence of this range of hydrographic characteristics is typical for an area the size of western Patagonia.
3.3 Distribution of Intact Forested Watersheds
Temperate forests in South America are distributed along a long, narrow strip on both sides of the Andes in the western part of the Southern Cone [9]. Of the total area of watersheds with mature forests in Chilean Patagonia (ca., 134,000 km2), 66,000 km2 were identified as intact forested watersheds (IFWs) with no large-scale logging or harvesting interventions, fires or roads (Fig. 3a).Footnote 1
The Gualas Glacier watershed (365 km2) in the Aysén Region is considered to be one of the largest intact watersheds; it has low forest cover, but large periglacial areas (Fig. 3e). This is also the case of the Roncagli River basin (234 km2) in the Cordillera Darwin Range, with a forest cover that is mainly limited to valley bottoms and coastal areas (Fig. 3f).
There are also intact watersheds with large forest cover whose waters originate in the Andes, including the Blanco River (190 km2) and the headwaters of the Puelo River (several intact watersheds totaling 389 km2), all in areas that are not included in a formal conservation category (Figs. 3b and 4). Despite its proximity to Punta Arenas, one of the largest cities in Chilean Patagonia, the Brunswick Peninsula conserves large contiguous intact watersheds, with the Caleta River (235 km2), South River (281 km2) and Gold River (256 km2), which flow into the Strait of Magellan (Fig. 3d). Finally, the Murta/San Juan River area (452 and 258 km2, respectively) and Elefante Bay (several contiguous IWCs totaling 479 km2) are very large coastal watersheds with 100% evergreen forest cover that have been conserved without major impacts, due to the characteristics of their forests and because they are difficult to access (Fig. 3c).
The pie chart in the upper right corner indicates the proportion of the area in each conservation category: public protected areas (SNASPE), private protected areas, and unprotected or without any conservation category, which are mainly public lands [75].
According to updates from the National Forestry Corporation’s Native Forest Inventory [24], land use in these intact watersheds was classified with 44.5% as forest, 41.6% as alpine zone (above the tree line) and smaller percentages of wetlands, grasslands and scrubland (Fig. 5). The forest cover within these intact watersheds totals ca. 30,000 km2, with the highest coverage in the Aysén Region, then in the Los Lagos Region and finally in Magallanes, where there is also naturally less forest cover (Fig. 6b).
3.4 Biodiversity
The conservation status of freshwater biodiversity is broadly discussed in Reid et al. [95], while in this chapter we address biodiversity on two different levels: (i) one related to ecosystem diversity in intact forested micro-watersheds, analyzing how these intact watersheds are distributed along the bioclimatic gradient of western Patagonia (Fig. 6), assuming that the bioclimatic gradient per se creates patterns of terrestrial and freshwater ecosystem biodiversity; (sii) a review of the state of knowledge on biodiversity associated with the ecotone of the riparian and aquatic zones present in primary forest watersheds in western Patagonia.
3.4.1 First Level: Representation of Ecosystems in Intact Watersheds
The pronounced variation in precipitation across Patagonia represents one of the steepest bioclimatic gradients in the world [38, 110], and is one of the factors that explains the large changes in biodiversity and the composition of vegetation species. The results of the mapping and analysis of the distribution of intact micro-watersheds in the different vegetation types by elevation and bioclimatic zones provide a first look at the diversity of ecosystems present in intact watersheds (Fig. 6). Intact watersheds are mostly distributed in precipitation ranges between 500 and 2500 mm per year (Fig. 6a). The high frequency of watersheds with precipitation between 500 and 1000 mm may be related to the high frequency of micro-watersheds in the lenga (Nothofagus pumilio) forests in the headwaters of western Patagonia’s central valley, which are frequent, but not large (Fig. 6d). Intact micro-watersheds occur mostly in evergreen forests in the Aysén and Los Lagos Regions, while in Magallanes these watersheds occur mainly in deciduous forests (Fig. 6b).
The histogram of elevation frequencies of the intact watersheds is bimodal, with a first peak between 200 and 400 m. and another above 1000 m. in the upper parts or headwaters of the larger continental basins (Fig. 6c). The first peak is related to coastal areas such as Elefante Bay, the watershed of the Gualas Glacier and the San Juan River (Exploradores Valley) whose access is limited, or forest exploitation has been restricted because they are currently included within the Laguna San Rafael National Park conservation unit (Fig. 6c). The second peak corresponds to headwater basins that frequently contain strips of primary forests located above the forest boundary in the alpine zone dominated by sparse high-altitude vegetation, rocks, ice, lagoons and glaciers (Fig. 6c). Wetlands are also present in small headwater basins, especially in mountain rivers (Fig. 1). This tendency is typical of watersheds with forests of mainly lenga (Nothofagus pumilio) and ñirre (Nothofagus antarctica), but not necessarily of the zone of channels and fjords where many streams originate from the forest and have a much less pronounced zonation (Fig. 1).
3.4.2 Second Level: Conservation in Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems
The global biodiversity crisis is the product of anthropogenic threats to forests [115] and inland waters [26, 69]. This section is divided into three subsections: (i) threatened flagship species that are generally the most well-known by the greater public, (ii) preliminary review of the list of species under a conservation category (Species Sheets of the Ministry of Environment, in Spansih Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, MMA) listed for Los Lagos and Magallanes regions, and (iii) preliminary observations on aquatic invertebrate and bryophyte biodiversity in Patagonia.
-
(i)
Flagship species
The temperate forest ecosystems of Chile and Argentina are the habitat of several Patagonian flagship species, such as the huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus), puma (Puma concolor), huillín (southern river otter) (Lontra provocax) and Darwin’s frog (Rhinoderma darwinii), among others. They are defined as flagship species because they are well-known by the public and often promote a general interest in conservation (e.g. Macdonald et al. [64]). A preliminary list of these species is presented in Table 1, together with a summary of the knowledge about them based mainly on a literature review, using keywords (species names) and the species sheets in the MMA database. Some of these species belong to the category of keystone species, defined as generalist species that have wide distribution ranges and require contiguous blocks of habitat with buffer zones and connectivity between landscapes for their conservation (according to Forbes and Chase [30], Echeverría et al. [33]).
The mapping considered micro-watersheds of approximately 1 km2 on average as units of analysis. However, neighboring intact watersheds add up to form extensive landscapes of watersheds with habitats without intervention, reaching surfaces of contiguous areas of approximately 500 km2. The fact that Chilean Patagonia is a naturally fragmented landscape should also be considered. Many animal species show a significant biodiversity turnover in the gradient from the evergreen Valdivian forests to the Patagonian steppe, and they have high degrees of endemism in the different zones [55, 54, 86]. We can consider these aggregated micro-watersheds as larger watersheds, analogous to the concept of “habitat core” [17].
Expeditions by naturalists to Chilean Patagonia indicate that many of the mammal species present today once occupied a greater diversity of habitats, including river valleys, forests, and mountainous areas [39, 84]. The geographic range of several flagship Patagonian species in Chile and Argentina has been described as much more extensive latitudinally than longitudinally. Impacts generated from the twentieth century onwards by fires, erosion, cattle ranching, and urban centers resulted in losses of these large continuous areas of intact landscapes and forests in western Patagonia [57, 77]. The distribution of several flagship species of Chilean Patagonia has receded to the last inaccessible habitats with little intervention in the upper parts of the watersheds, and in some cases to environments unfavorable for their populations. This may be the case of the huemul, considered a species of high mountains and extreme zones [51, 97], but during the early stages of European colonization, its presence was greater in the productive valleys in the vicinity of Coyhaique such as Simpson River [67].
-
(ii)
Species with conservation problems
The list of species in the precarious conservation category [76] between Los Lagos and Magallanes Regions of Chile includes 367 taxa, of which more than 100 are associated with aquatic ecosystems: rivers, streams, lakes, wetlands, large rivers and transition from freshwater to coastal systems. Most of these species are discussed in detail in Reid et al. [95]. Below, we refer in particular to terrestrial species listed in some conservation category in the MMA Species Sheets, which are often associated with riparian zones. The list includes 30 species of fungi (22 genera), including the two species of Cyttaria, known as “Indian bread,” which parasitize living trees and probably face the same threats that affect forests. However, the diversity of fungi in Patagonian forest systems is still poorly studied. There are 52 species of ferns, many of which are epiphytes (e.g. Grammitis and Hymenophyllum spp.). This diversity of pteridophytes is also mainly associated with intact forest systems [89]. The only vascular plant species associated with streams in forests is Hebe salicifolia, although its relationship with intact systems is not clear. One noteworthy point is that ferns outnumber vascular plants (35 species) and that plants, such as Juncaceae and the graminoids require more effort for taxonomic identification; Poaceae and Cyperaceae are virtually absent (B. Reid, personal observation). This is probably an indication of the lack of more complete studies and/or assessments of the conservation status of this flora, at least in remote locations (with the exception of Tierra del Fuego, Moore [78]. An alternative explanation may be that ferns are better represented in the Patagonian flora, as is the case for lichens and bryophytes [82, 83, 99].
We should not only consider flagship species, or species already recognized as species with conservation problems, but also the diversity of lesser-known groups whose potential species richness indicate that they are possibly the ones that contribute most to regional biodiversity. We refer to aquatic insects, mosses, ferns, lichens and freshwater algae [58, 80, 85]. Unfortunately, knowledge of these species in the mapped ecosystems is still very poor.
-
(iii)
Freshwater species richness
Aquatic species richness is concentrated in insects (Plecoptera, Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera), crustaceans (Aegla and Hyalella), gastropods and bryophytes [95, 108,109,108]. The diversity of these groups in Chilean Patagonia has been described as slightly lower than in the Valdivian region [109]. Many taxonomic groups undoubtedly reach the southern limit of their geographic range in the latitudinal gradient of Chilean Patagonia, although there has been less sampling effort than in regions farther north [80, 85]. Freshwater diversity along east–west bioclimatic gradients in less accessible watercourses such as headwater streams and in the island and fjord region is represented with very few examples [95]. A prominent exception is research conducted in Magallanes, primarily on Navarino island, where macroinvertebrate biodiversity has been described in aquatic systems in steep elevation gradients with very little intervention [22, 21, 96].
Preliminary results on macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams with watersheds dominated by primary forests in Aysén indicate a total of 89 species, of which almost 40% had not been recorded before in the region [85, 108]. Preliminary results indicate that macroinvertebrate diversity in 102 micro-watersheds studied to date is strongly related to natural climatic and hydrological variation among basins [12]. Among the climatic variables that best explain macroinvertebrate diversity are regional precipitation and temperature gradients [12]. Forest cover and hydrological properties of the channel are closely related to the composition of stream invertebrates [12]. The latter is probably related to an altitudinal gradient and the origin of the stream (e.g. alpine zone or forest).
Biodiversity studies of bryophytes carried out in the riverbeds and riparian zone of the micro-watersheds of the headwaters of the Aysén rivers and lake General Carrera identified 258 taxa: 3 anthocerotes, 101 liverworts (100 species and one variety) and 154 mosses (153 species and one variety). Two of the species are new records for Chile: the liverworts Austrololophozia andina R.M. Schust. and Riccardia theliophora Hässel.); 41 are new records for the Aysén Region; 105 are new records for the General Carrera province; 77 are new records for the Coyhaique province and 22 are new records for the Aysén province [48, 58, 82, 83], in addition to one new record for science (Syntrichia lamellaris, Gallego et al., [106]). These results show us that the distribution of bryophytes in the Aysén Region, as well as in other sectors of Chilean Patagonia, is still poorly known, as is true for other taxonomic groups as well.
The analysis of Reid et al. [95] complements this biodiversity section on two important topics: (i) it discusses the literature review of other freshwater taxonomic groups associated with headwater streams, such as amphibians and native fishes, which also contribute to watershed conservation values, (ii) it refers to the state of knowledge of invasive exotic species, which are currently affecting freshwater systems in western Patagonia, such as salmonids, mink and beaver among vertebrates, and among plants, species such as lupine (Lupinus polyphyllus) and willow (Salix fragilis), which are invading riparian zones and larger riverbeds [60, 72].
3.5 Threats
The forested watersheds of western Patagonia with little intervention provide valuable ecosystem services such as drinking water supply and irrigation, flood control, provision of habitat for biodiversity, carbon sequestration and cultural services, which collectively can provide economic and non-economic values for local communities [14]. These services in Chilean Patagonia are threatened by the impacts of human activities, including the introduction of invasive species, fires, cattle ranching, road construction and the unsustainable use of timber resources, added to the effects of global climate change [66]. These processes have gradually led to habitat degradation and fragmentation, soil erosion, the spread of invasive species, pollution and overexploitation of forests [40]. The most serious threats currently facing these ecosystems are detailed below.
3.5.1 Climate Change
Climate projections based on global and regional models are generally rather uncertain for the complex terrain of the region [59, 112]. Temperature increase is expected to be less, in part due to regional cooling of ocean temperatures [32, 38, 37]. Effects on the headwater stream temperature may be weak due to this oceanic climate, but water temperature also depends on rainwater input and snowmelt, and this equilibrium (snow line or zero isotherm) is changing across the region, based on local observations [46]. Historical data in the region exhibit a decreasing trend in precipitation in recent decades [5]. Unfortunately, current regional climate models do not clarify the uncertainties of the projections, since a significant portion of the Chilean Patagonian region is located in a transition between areas of decreasing (Los Lagos Region) and increasing precipitation (Magallanes Region) that also vary between the east and west [31]. Specific changes in precipitation and temperature in Chilean Patagonia will affect forest regeneration, hydrology, erosion, soil quality and alpine zone boundaries, among others [66].
3.5.2 Timber and Firewood Extraction
One of the most intense current anthropogenic pressures on the forested watersheds of Chilean Patagonia is firewood extraction. The Los Lagos and Aysén regions are home to the greatest expanses of native forests, and the extraction of firewood and timber is also the most intense, mainly large volumes of lenga (67%) and ñirre (31%). Coihue (Nothofagus dombeyi), pine, and tepa occupy the remaining 2% (Ministry of Agriculture [73, 74]; in Spanish Ministerio de Agricultura). Timber extraction is generally carried out on roads that frequently cross or run parallel to bodies of water, leading to soil erosion and sedimentation in streams during rain events. This sediment load in streams affects primary production, habitat availability and aquatic biodiversity [3]. Such effects could be exacerbated by changes in precipitation and seasonality [32, 31, 38], as many of the slopes and streams without vegetation cover could be eroded.
Energy needs are met in the Aysén Region by the use of firewood (approximately 687,000 cubic meters of firewood are consumed annually), but only 40% of the harvest has a management plan. The largest volumes of firewood and timber are harvested near population centers [105]. The forests that supply the city of Coyhaique, the capital of the Aysén Region, with firewood, for example, include the areas of Lake Pollux and Frío, Cerro La Virgen, Cerro Galera, and Villa Ortega, among others [98, 105]. As timber resources are depleted, the distance to the harvest centers increases and the area moves towards the high-altitude forests.
Atmospheric pollution due to the intense domestic use of firewood, plus the thermal inversion effect that occurs during fall and winter months in Coyhaique (April–August) have made the city the most polluted in Latin America in some periods, according to data analyzed by the World Health Organization between 2013 and 2016 (The Guardian, May 12, 2016). The government enacted the first Environmental Decontamination Plan (PDA in Spanish) for the area in 2015. This plan involves several measures aimed at diversifying the energy grid, improving the thermal insulation of homes, replacing heaters and environmental education, to improve air conditions in Coyhaique and other urban centers in the region. The long-term plan could also theoretically reduce threats to Aysén’s intact forested watersheds.
3.5.3 Loss of Connectivity and Fragmentation
One of the greatest threats to the large tracts of intact landscapes in western Patagonia is the expansion of the road network. The growth of the road network allows access to primary forests that for cost reasons were excluded from timber production, facilitating the entry of livestock and other exotic animals, and generating impacts that accelerate their exploitation and degradation [56, 91]. The network of logging roads has also been shown to have negative impacts on river channels, changing channel geomorphology and sediment loads in watersheds [116]. In Chilean Patagonia these problems are due to poor territorial planning, which should consider not only the need for connectivity, but also the conservation status of terrestrial ecosystems and watersheds crossed by roads. An example of this urgent need for planning and zoning is the Special Development Plan for Extreme Zones, where the Agricultural Development Institute (in Spanish INDAP) has established a special road construction program with a budget of 3 billion Chilean pesos that proposes to build a total of 550 km of roads connecting properties within three years [17].
3.5.4 Summer Livestock Grazing in Headwater Watersheds and Alpine Areas of Public Lands
As has been said, headwater streams in forests with little intervention safeguard the quality and quantity of water and the integrity of aquatic ecosystems downstream, but their usefulness is undermined by the use of equally pristine, but much more fragile areas in the alpine zone. A clear example is the management and control of summer grazing. This activity takes place in pastures belonging to the State located in the high-altitude mountain areas, which are used only four months a year due to climatic characteristics (Ministry of National Asssets 2018; in Spanish Ministerio de Bienes Nacionales, MBN; and personal communication). The MBN currently grants permits for use; however, there is no regular oversight of uses and impacts. Summer livestock grazing is a culturally rooted practice in the region, on public and inaccessible lands where indiscriminate use is made of the resources of an area where the watershed’s watercourses are born. The lack of management results in the degradation of vegetation resources, native fauna, and water sources.
4 Conclusions and Recommendations
Headwater basins could be likened to water towers; objects in the landscape that capture, store, and deliver water to downstream ecosystems, both those with little intervention and those with more intense productive use. Although freshwater ecosystems are among the most threatened in the world, their point of greatest vulnerability is their origin in the upper parts of the mountain range, where small, crystalline, meandering streams are born. When these streams pass through forests, the risk of losing their integrity increases due to the demand for wood products, such as firewood, as well as road construction, especially in the temperate biome. Therefore, intact forested watersheds should be among the primary targets for freshwater and intact landscape conservation (Fig. 4).
According to our analysis, the watersheds with forest cover that drain into the Patagonian fjords and the Pacific represent a great opportunity for global conservation, but a significant portion of them are outside existing protected areas. In this chapter, information on the specific biodiversity of these ecosystems was presented and discussed, highlighting the limited knowledge of the species present there and their natural history. The analysis of the spatial distribution and bioclimatic diversity of these systems is now available for planning [90] and redefining conservation priorities.
Although Chilean Patagonia has approximately 50% of its total area under some category of conservation, the unprotected areas contain approximately half of the intact forested watersheds mapped in this research (Fig. 4). These watersheds without major interventions also contain some of the ecosystems most vulnerable to climate change and land use change, the headwater watersheds together with their mature primary forest, stunted and alpine zone ecosystems (Figs. 4 and 5). Therefore, we present the following recommendations for conservation and sustainable use:
-
Ensure that public policy and/or regional conservation and land use planning instruments recognizes the importance of the watershed concept which integrates water, forests, and soils. This should be accompanied by a system of incentives to landowners in order to effectively conserve the most pristine or valuable areas for their biodiversity, together with improved management and related public policies. More specific mechanisms for these purposes could be, for example.
-
Forest management plans or recreational use plans in the SNASPE should include the micro-watershed as a planning and zoning unit, considering the connection between water, forests, and soil.
-
Fodder subsidies are required as an alternative practice to high-altitude summer livestock grazing, along with improvements in the registry/mapping of active summer grazing areas and carrying capacities.
-
Protection of wetlands associated with headwater streams is required, starting with a wetland registry for this region [65, 95].
-
Implementation of integrated management pilot projects in small watersheds (10–30 km2), which due to their size and lesser degree of conflicts between different uses have a greater chance of success. At the same time, valuable experience could be gained in carrying out planning and conservation projects on larger scales, for example, pilot programs in watersheds that provide drinking water in rural communities, where planning and/or zoning of uses has a direct impact on the quantity and quality of drinking water. It is also necessary to develop local models for the provision of ecosystem services (including payment for these services) in different land use scenarios of watersheds [4].
-
Chile-Argentina binational efforts. Conservation of watersheds has to respect hydrological boundaries and not just political ones, as in freshwater biodiversity conservation [95]. There is a large percentage of binational headwater watersheds that contribute to the large rivers that flow into the fjord zone of Chilean Patagonia (Fig. 2). Binational conservation management in Patagonia would be more effective in several aspects related to freshwater biodiversity, along with the idea of anticipating conflicts.
Notes
- 1.
See methods in Astorga et al. [11], data at: https://ide.goreaysen.cl/index.php/documentos-menu/category/4-documents-aysen.
References
Abell, R., Allan, J. D., Lehner, B. (2007). Unlocking the potential of protected areas for freshwaters. Biological Conservation, 134, 48–63.
Acosta, G., & Lucherini, M. (2008). Leupardus guigna (on-line). The IUCN Red list of threatened species. Retrieved from: https://www.iucnredlist.org/details/15311
Allan, D. J., & Castillo, M. M. (2007). Stream ecology: Structure and function of running waters. Springer.
Álvarez-Garretón, C., Lara, A., Boisier, J. P., & Galleguillos, M. (2019). The impacts of native forests and plantation on water supply in Chile. Forests, 10, 473.
Aravena, J. C., & Luckman, B. (2009). Spatio-temporal rainfall patterns in southern South America. International Journal of Climatology, 29(14), 2106–2120.
Armesto, J. J., Manuschevich, D., Mora, A., Smith-Ramírez, C., Rozzi, R., Abarzua, A., & Marquet, P. (2010). From the Holocene to the Anthropocene: A historical framework for land cover change in southwestern South America in the past 15,000 years. Land Use Policy, 27, 148–160.
Armesto, J. J., Rozzi, R., Smith-Ramirez, C., & Arroyo, M. T. K. (1998). Effective conservation targets in South American temperate forests. Science, 282, 1271–1272.
Armesto, J. J., Villagrán C., & Donoso, C. (1994). La historia del bosque templado chileno. Revista Ambiente y Desarrollo, 67–72.
Armesto, J. J., Smith-Ramírez, C., Carmona, M., Celis-Diez, J., Díaz, I., Gaxiola, A., Gutiérrez, A., Núñez-Ávila, M., Pérez, C., & Rozzi, R. (2009). Old-growth temperate rainforests of South America: conservation, plant-animal interactions, and baseline biogeochemical processes. In: C. Wirth, G. Gleixner, M. Heimann (Eds.), Old-growth forests. Ecological studies (Analysis and synthesis) (Vol. 207, pp. 367–390). Springer.
Arroyo, M. T. K. (1998). Los bosques de lenga de Chile ¿qué debemos hacer para asegurar su adecuada preservación y uso sustentable? In: Defensores del Bosque Nativo (Eds). La tragedia del bosque chileno (pp. 110–116). Ocho Libros Editores.
Astorga, A., Moreno, P. C., & Reid, B. (2018). Watersheds and trees fall together: An analysis of intact forested watersheds in southern Patagonia (41–56°S). Forests, 9, 385.
Astorga, A., Reid, B., Uribe, L., Moreno-Meynard, P., Fierro, P., Madriz, I., & Death, R. G. (2022). Macroinvertebrate community composition and richness along extreme gradients: The role of local, catchment, and climatic variables in Patagonian headwater streams. Freshwater Biology, 67(3), 445–460.
Aylwin, J., Arce, L., Núñez, D., Guerra, F., Álvarez, R., Mansilla P., Alday, D., Caro, L., Chiguay, C., & Huenucoy, C. (2023). Conservation and indigenous people in Chilean Patagonia. Springer.
Bachmann-Vargas, P., De la Barrera, F., & Tironi, A. (2014). Recopilación y sistematización de información relativa a estudios de evaluación, mapeo y valorización de servicios ecosistémicos en Chile. Cienciambiental Consultores S.A. Retrieved from: http://portal.mma.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Informe-final.pdf
Bizama, G., Torrejón, F., Aguayo, M., Muñoz, M. D., Echeverría, C., & Urrutia, R. (2011). Pérdida y fragmentación del bosque nativo en la cuenca del río Aysén (Patagonia-Chile) durante el siglo XX. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 49, 125–138.
Brookhuis, B., & Hein, L. (2016). The value of the flood control service of tropical forests: A case study for Trinidad. Forest Policy and Economics, 62, 118–124.
Buchanan, J. B., Fredrickson, R. J., & Seaman, D. E. (1998). Mitigation of habitat “take” and the core area concept. Conservation Biology, 12(1), 238–240.
Campos, H., Dazarola, G., Dyer, B., Fuentes, L., Gavilán, J., Huaquín, L., Martínez, G., Meléndez, R., Pequeño, G., & Ponce, F. (1998). Categorías de conservación de peces nativos de aguas continentales de Chile. Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural Chile, 47, 101–122.
Cassini, M., & Sepúlveda, M. (2006). El huillín Lontra provocax: Investigaciones sobre una nutria patagónica en peligro de extinción. Profauna, Serie Fauna Neotropical, 1, 162.
Cofre, H., & Marquet, P. A. (1999). Conservation status, rarity, and geographic priorities for conservation of Chilean mammals: An assessment. Biological Conservation, 88, 53–68.
Contador, T., Kennedy, J., Ojeda, J., Feinsinger, P., & Rozzi, R. (2014). Ciclos de vida de insectos dulceacuícolas y cambio climático global en la ecorregión subantártica de Magallanes: Investigaciones ecológicas a largo plazo en el Parque Etnobotánico Omora, Reserva de Biósfera Cabo de Hornos (55°S). Bosque, 35, 429–437.
Contador, T. A., Kennedy, J. H., & Rozzi, R. (2012). The conservation status of southern South American aquatic insects in the literature. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 2095–2107.
Contador, T., Kennedy, J. H., Rozzi, R., & Ojeda, J. (2015). Sharp altitudinal gradients in Magellanic sub-antarctic streams: Patterns along a fluvial system in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve (55S). Polar Biology, 38(11), 18531866.
Corporación Nacional Forestal, Chile. (2020). Catastro de Uso de Suelo y Vegetación. Obtenido de: http://www.ide.cl/descarga/capas/item/catastros-de-uso-de-suelo-y-vegetacion.html
Crump, M. (2002). Natural history of Darwin’s frog, Rhinoderma darwinii. Herpetological Natural History, 9, 21–30.
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A., Gessner, M., Kawabata, Z., Knowler, D., Leveque, C., Naiman, R., Prieur-Richard, A., Soto, D., Stiassny, M., & Sullivan, C. (2006). Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews, 81, 163–178.
Díaz-Páez, H., & Ortiz, J. C. (2003). Evaluación del estado de conservación de los anfibios en Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 76, 509–525.
D’Odorico, P., Laio, F., Porporato, A., Ridolfi, L., Rinaldo, A., & Rodríguez-Iturbe, I. (2010). Ecohydrology of terrestrial ecosystems. BioScience, 60(11), 898–907.
Echeverría, C., Coomes, D., Salas, J., Rey-Benayas, J. M., Lara, A., & Newton, A. (2006). Rapid deforestation and fragmentation of Chilean temperate forests. Biological Conservation, 130, 481–494.
Echeverría, C., Newton, A., Lara, A., Benayas, J., & Coomes, D. (2007). Impacts of forest fragmentation on species composition and forest structure in the temperate landscape of southern Chile. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 426–439.
Falvey, M. (2012). Simulación regional con el modelo PRECIS. Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia (Chile), 40(1), 45–50.
Falvey, M., & Garreaud, R. D. (2009). Regional cooling in a warming world: Recent temperature trends in the southeast Pacific and along the west coast of subtropical South America (1979–2006). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114, D04102.
Forbes, A. E., & Chase, J. M. (2002). The role of habitat connectivity and landscape geometry in experimental zooplankton metacommunities. Oikos, 96, 433–440.
Franklin, W. L., & Johnson, W. E. (1994). Hand capture of newborn open-habitat ungulates: The South American huanaco. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 22, 253–259.
Franklin, W. L., Johnson, W. E., Sarno, R. J., & Iriarte, J. A. (1999). Ecology of the Patagonia puma Felis concolor in southern Chile. Biological Conservation, 90, 33–40.
Frêne, C., Dörner, J., Zúñiga, F., Cuevas, J., Alfaro, F., & Armesto, J. (2020). Eco-hydrological functions in forested catchments of southern Chile. Ecosystems, 23(2), 307–323.
Garreaud, R., Boisier, J., Rondanelli, R., Montecinos, A., Sepúlveda, H., & Veloso-Águila, D. (2019). The central Chile mega drought (2010–2018): A climate dynamics perspective. International Journal of Climatology, 40, 421–439.
Garreaud, R., Lopez, P., Minvielle, M., & Rojas, M. (2013). Large-scale control on the Patagonian climate. Journal of Climate, 26(1), 215–230.
Gay, C. (1854). Atlas de la Historia Fisica y Política de Chile, Tomo I y II. 3a Edición. LOM Ediciones 2010.
Gutiérrez, A., & Díaz-Hormazábal, I. (2019). Monitoreo de la alteración del dosel en bosques nativos. Universidad de Chile. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332083104_MONITOREO_DE_LA_ALTERACION_DEL_DOSEL_EN_BOSQUES_NATIVOS
Haddad, N. M., Brudvig, L. A., Clobert, J., Davies, K. F., González, A., Holt, R. D., Lovejoy, T. E., Sexton, J. O., Austin, M. P., & Collins, C. D. (2015). Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on earth’s ecosystems. Science Advances, 1(2), e1500052.
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S., Goetz, S., & Loveland, T. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342, 850–853.
Harmon, M. E., Franklin, J. F., Swanson, F. J., Sollins, P., Gregory, S. V., Lattin, J. D., Anderson, N. H., Cline, S. P., Aumen, N. G., Sedell, J. R., Lienkaemper, G. W., Cromack, K. Jr., & Cummins, K. W. (1986). Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. In: A. MacFadyen & E. D. Ford (Eds.), Advances in ecological research (pp. 133–302). Academic Press.
Hedin, L. O., Armesto, J. J., & Johnson, A. (1995). Patterns of nutrient loss from unpolluted, old-growth forests: Evaluation of biogeochemical theory. Ecology, 76, 493–509.
Hedin, L., & Campos, H. (1991). Importance of small streams in understanding and comparing watershed ecosystem processes. Revista Chilena Historia Natural, 64, 583–596.
Helman, M. I. (2015). Perceptions of climate change and water governance vulnerability in the Aysén region of Chile. [Thesis]. University of Montana, Missoula, MT. Retrieved from: https://www.cfc.umt.edu/grad/icd/files/Helman_Michal_Thesis.pdf
Huygens, D., Rütting, T., Boeckx, P., Van Cleemput, O., Godoy, R., & Müller, C. (2007). Soil nitrogen conservation mechanisms in a pristine south Chilean Nothofagus forest ecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39(10), 2448–2458.
Hässel de Menéndez, G. G., & Rubies, M. (2009). Catalogue of Marchantiophyta and Anthocerotophyta of southern South America: Chile, Argentina and Uruguay, including Easter Is. (Pascua I.), Malvinas Is. (Falkland Is.), South Georgia Is., and the subantarctic South Shetland Is., South Sandwich Is., and South Orkney Is. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft, Borntraeger Gebrueder.
Instituto de Desarrollo Agropecuario. (2015). Programa de caminos intraprediales. Obtenido de: http://www.indap.gob.cl/noticias/detalle/2015/10/01/caminos-intraprediales-acortan-distancias-para-la-agricultura-campesina-de-ays%C3%A9n
Iriarte, J. A., Feinsinger, P., & Jaksic, F. M. (1997). Trends in wildlife use and trade in Chile. Biological Conservation, 81, 9–20.
Iriarte, A., Donoso, D. S., Segura, B., & Tirado, M. (2017). El huemul de Aysén y otros rincones. Ediciones Secretaría Regional Ministerial de Agricultura de la Región de Aysén y Flora y Fauna Chile Ltda.
Jaramillo, A., Burke, P., and Beadle, D. (2005). Aves de Chile. Barcelona, España: Lynx Ediciones.
Keeton, W. S., Kraft, C. E., & Warren, D. (2007). Mature and old growth riparian forests: Structure, dynamics and effects on Adirondack stream habitats. Ecological Applications, 17(3), 852–868.
Kelt, D. A. (1994). The natural history of small mammals from Aysén region, southern Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 67, 183–207.
Kelt, D. A. (1989). Biogeography and assemblage structure of small mammals across a transition zone in southern Chile. [Thesis]. Northern Illinois University, IL, USA.
Kleinschroth, F., & Healey, J. R. (2017). Impacts of logging roads on tropical forests. Biotropica, 49(5), 620–635.
Lara, A. M., Solari, M., Prieto, M., & Peña, M. P. (2012). Reconstrucción de la cobertura de la vegetación y uso del suelo hacia 1550 y sus cambios a 2007 en la ecorregión de los bosques valdivianos lluviosos de Chile (35°–43° 30´ S). Bosque, 33(1), 13–23.
Larraín, J. (2016). The mosses (Bryophyta) of Capitán Prat province, Aysén Region, southern Chile. PhytoKeys, 68, 91–116.
Lenaerts, J. T., Van Den Broeke, M. R., Van Wessem, J. M., Van De Berg, W. J., Van Meijgaard, E., Van Ulft, L. H., & Schaefer, M. (2014). Extreme precipitation and climate gradients in Patagonia revealed by high-resolution regional atmospheric climate modeling. Journal of Climate, 27(12), 4607–4621.
Lewerentz, A., Eggers, G., Householder, E., Reid, B., Garofano-Gómez, V., & Braun, A. (2019). Functional assessment of invasive Salix fragilis L. in north-western Patagonian flood plains: A comparative approach. Acta Oecologica, 95, 36–44.
Likens, G. (2013). Biogeochemistry of a forested ecosystem (3rd ed.). Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Lowe, W. H., & Likens, G. E. (2005). Moving headwater streams to the head of the class. BioScience, 55(3), 196–197.
Luyssaert, S., Schulze, E. D., Börner, A., Knohl, A., Hessenmöller, D., Law, B. E., Ciais, P., & Grace, J. (2008). Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature, 455, 213–215.
Macdonald, E., Hinks, A., Weiss, D. J., Dickman, A., Burnham, D., Sandom, C. J., Malhi, Y., & Macdonald, D. W. (2017). Identifying species for conservation marketing. Global ecology and Conservation, 12, 204–214.
Mansilla, C. A., Domínguez, E., Mackenzie, R., Hoyos-Santillán, J., Henríquez, J. M., Aravena, J. C., & Villa-Martínez, R. (2023). Peatlands in Chilean Patagonia: Distribution, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and conservation. Springer.
Marquet, P. A., Buschmann, A. H., Corcoran, D., Díaz, P. A., Fuentes-Castillo, T., Garreaud, R., Pliscoff, P., &Salazar, A. (2023). Global change and acceleration of anthropic pressures on Patagonian ecosystems. Springer.
Martinic, M. (2005). De la trapananda al Aysén: una mirada reflexiva sobre el acontecer de la región de Aysén desde la prehistoria hasta nuestros días (Vol. 38). Pehuén Editores Ltda.
Martínez-Tilleria, K., Núñez-Ávila, M., & León, C. A., et al. (2017). A framework for the classification Chilean terrestrial ecosystems as a tool for achieving global conservation targets. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26, 2857–2876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1393-x
Master, L., Flack, S. R., & Stein, B. A, (eds.). (1998). Rivers of life: Critical watersheds for protecting freshwater biodiversity. The Nature Conservancy.
McDowall, R. M. (1969). A juvenile of Aplochiton taeniatus. Copeia, 631–632.
Medina, G. (1996). Conservation and status of Lutra provocax in Chile. Pacific Conservation Biology, 2, 414–419.
Meier, C., Reid, B., & Sandoval, O. (2013). Effects of the invasive plant Lupinus polyphyllus on vertical accretion of fine sediment and nutrient availability in bars of the gravel-bed Paloma River. Limnologica, 43(5), 381–387.
Ministerio de Agricultura. (2015a). Caracterización de centros de acopio rurales y periurbanos de leña en las regiones de O’Higgins, Maule, Bío Bío, Araucanía, Los Ríos, Los Lagos y Aysén. Unidad Dendroenergía.
Ministerio de Agricultura. (2015b). Medición del consumo nacional de leña y otros combustibles sólidos derivados de la madera. Unidad Dendroenergía. MINAGRI.
Ministerio de Bienes Nacionales. (2018). Bienes nacionales protegidos. Obtenido de: http://www.ide.cl/descarga/capas/item/bienes-nacionales-protegidos.html
Ministerio del Medio Ambiente. (2019). Fichas de especies. Obtenido de: http://especies.mma.gob.cl/CNMWeb/Web/WebCiudadana/pagina.aspx?id=87&pagId=85
Miranda, A., Altamirano, A., Cayuela, L., Lara, A., & González, M. (2016). Native forest loss in the Chilean biodiversity hotspot: Revealing the evidence. Regional Environmental Change, 17(1), 285–297.
Moore, D. M. (1983). Flora of the Fuego-Patagonian cordilleras: Its origins and affinities. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 56, 123–136.
Morales-Hidalgo, D., Oswalt, S. N., & Somanathan, E. (2015). Status and trends in global primary forest, protected areas, and areas designated for conservation of biodiversity from the global forest resources assessment 2015. Forest Ecology Management, 352, 68–77.
Moya, C., Valdovinos, C., Moraga, A., Romero, F., Debels, P., & Oyanedel, A. (2009). Patrones de distribución espacial de ensambles de macroinvertebrados bentónicos de un sistema fluvial andino patagónico. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 82, 425–442.
Muñoz-Pedreros, A. (2000). Orden Rodentia. In A. Muñoz-Pedreros & J. Yáñez (Eds.), Mamíferos de Chile (pp. 201–203). Ediciones CEA.
Müller, F. (2009). An updated checklist of the mosses of Chile. Archive for Bryology, 58, 1–124.
Müller, F. (2009). New records and new synonyms for the Chilean moss flora. Tropical Bryology, 30, 77–84.
Osorio, M., Saavedra, G., & Velázquez, H. (2007). Otras narrativas en Patagonia. Tres miradas antropológicas a la región de Aysén. Editorial Ñirre Negro.
Oyanedel, A., Valdovinos, C., Azócar, M., Moya, C., Mancilla, G., Pedreros, P., & Figueroa, R. (2008). Patrones de distribución espacial de los macroinvertebrados bentónicos de la cuenca del río Aysén (Patagonia chilena). Gayana Botanica, 72, 241–257.
Patterson, G. (1992). The ecology of a New Zealand grassland lizard guild. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 22(2), 91–106.
Perakis, S., & Hedin, L. (2001). Fluxes and fates of nitrogen in soil of an unpolluted old-growth temperate forest, southern Chile. Ecology, 82(8), 2245–2260.
Perakis, S., & Hedin, L. O. (2002). Nitrogen loss from unpolluted South American forests mainly via dissolved organic compounds. Nature, 415, 416–419.
Pincheira-Ulbrich, J., Rau, J. R., & Smith-Ramírez, C. (2012). Diversidad de plantas trepadoras y epífitas vasculares en un paisaje agroforestal del sur de Chile: Una comparación entre fragmentos de bosque nativo. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica, 47(3–4), 411–426.
Pliscoff, P., Martínez-Harms, M. J., & Fuentes-Castillo, T. (2023). Representativeness assessment and identification of priorities for the protection of terrestrial ecosystems in Chilean Patagonia. Springer.
Potapov, P., Hansen, M. C., Laestadius, L., Turubanova, S., Yaroshenko, A., Thies, C., Smith, W., Zhuravleva, I., Komarova, A., & Minnemeyer, S. (2017). The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Science Advances, 3(1), e1600821.
Pérez-Quezada, J., Célis, J. L., Brito, C., Gaxiola, A., Núñez-Ávila, M., Pugnaire, F., & Armesto, J. J. (2018). Carbon fluxes from a temperate rainforest site in southern South America reveal a very sensitive sink. Ecosphere, 9, e2193.
Pérez-Quezada, J. F., Olguín, S., Fuentes, J. P., & Galleguillos, M. (2015). Tree carbon stock in evergreen forests of Chiloe, Chile. Bosque, 36, 27–39.
Radic-Schilling, S., Corti, P., Muñoz, R., Butorovic, N., & Sánchez, L. (2023). Steppe ecosystems in Chilean Patagonia: distribution, climate, biodiversity, and threats to their sustainable management. Springer.
Reid, B., Astorga, A., Madriz, I., Correa, C., & Contador, T. (2023). A conservation assessment of freshwater ecosystems in southwestern Patagonia. Springer.
Rendoll, J., Contador, T., Gañán, M., Pérez, C., Maldonado, A., Convey, P., Kennedy, J., & Rozzi, R. (2020). Altitudinal gradients in Magellanic sub-Antarctic lagoons: The effect of elevation on freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and distribution. PeerJ, 7, e7128.
Rivera, A., Aravena, J. C., Urra, A., & Reid, B. (2023). Chilean Patagonian glaciers and environmental change. Springer.
Rojas, P. (2020). Assessment of ecosystem services in the Coyhaique watershed, Chilean Patagonia. Recommendations for sustainable development. [Thesis]. University of California, Davis, CA.
Rozzi, R., Armesto, J. J, Goffinet, B., Buck, W., Massardo, F., Silander, J., Arroyo M. T. K., Russell, S., Anderson, C., Cavieres, Lohengrin, J., & Callicott, J. (2008). Changing biodiversity conservation lenses: Insights from the subantarctic non-vascular flora of southern South America. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 131–137.
Salmon, C., Walter, M., Hedin, L., & Brown, M. (2001). Hydrological controls on chemical export from an undisturbed old-growth Chilean forest. Journal of Hydrology, 253, 69–80.
Sanderson, E. W., Jaiteh, M., Levy, M. A., Redford, K. H., Wannebo, A. V., & Woolmer, G. (2002). The human footprint and the last of the wild: The human footprint is a global map of human influence on the land surface, which suggests that human beings are stewards of nature, whether we like it or not. BioScience, 52(10), 891–904.
Saunders, D., Meeuwig, J., & Vincent, A. (2002). Freshwater protected areas: Strategies for conservation. Conservation Biology, 16(1), 30–41.
Sepúlveda, M., Valenzuela, A., Pozzi, C., Medina-Vogel, G., & Chehébar, C. (2015). Lontra provocax. The IUCN red list of threatened species: E. T12305a21938042. Obtenido de: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/12305/21938042
Stuardo, J., & Vega, R. (1985). Synopsis of the land mollusca of Chile: With remarks on distribution. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 20(3), 125–146.
Sáez, N. (2009). Distribución y caracterización de lugares boscosos proveedores de leña nativa destinada a la ciudad de Coyhaique (45°30′s). Tiempo y Espacio, 23, 7–24.
Teresa Gallego, M., Cano, M. J., Larraín, J., & Guerra, J. (2020). Syntrichia lamellaris M.T.Gallego, M.J.Cano & Larraín (Pottiaceae), a new moss species from Chilean Patagonia. Journal of Bryology, 42(2), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2019.1706036
Valdovinos, C. (2006). Estado de conocimiento de los gastrópodos dulceacuícolas de Chile. Gayana, 70(1), 100–113.
Valdovinos, C., Kiessling, A., Mardones, M., Moya, C., Oyanedel, A., Salvo, J., Olmos, V., & Parra, O. (2010). Distribución de macroinvertebrados (Plecoptera y Aeglidae) en ecosistemas fluviales de la Patagonia chilena: ¿muestran señales biológicas de la evolución geomorfológica postglacial? Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 83, 267–287.
Valdovinos, C. (2008). Invertebrados dulceacuícolas. Biodiversidad de Chile 204-225. Patrimonio y Desafios. Ocho Libros Editores.
Veblen, T. T., & Lorenz, D. C. (1988). Recent vegetation changes along the forest/steppe ecotone of northern Patagonia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78, 93–111.
Venter, O., Sanderson, E. W., Magrach, A., Allan, J. R., Beher, J., Jones, K. R., Possingham, H. P., Laurance, W. F., Wood, P., & Fekete, B. M. (2016). Global terrestrial human footprint maps for 1993 and 2009. Science Data, 3, 160067.
Vera, C., Silvestri, G., Liebmann, B., & González, P. (2006). Climate change scenarios for seasonal precipitation in South America from IPCC-AR4 models. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(13), L13707.
Vertessy, R. A., Watson, F. G., & Sharon, K. (2001). Factors determining relations between stand age and catchment water balance in mountain ash forests. Forest Ecology Management, 143, 13–26.
Vila, A., López, R., Pastore, H., Faúndez, R., & Serret, A. (2004). Distribución actual del huemul en Argentina y Chile. Publicación técnica de WCS, FVSA y CODEFF.
Watson, J. E., Evans, T., Venter, O., Williams, B., Tulloch, A., Stewart, C., Thompson, I., Ray, J. C., Murray, K., & Salazar, A. (2018). The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 599–610.
Wemple, B. C., Swanson, F. J., & Jones, J. A. (2001). Forest roads and geomorphic process interactions, cascade range, Oregon. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 26, 191–204.
World Resources Institute. (2017). Annual report. Obtenido de: https://wriorg.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/uploads/wri-2017-annual-report.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this chapter or parts of it.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roine, A.A., Moreno-Meynard, P., Rojas R., P., Reid, B. (2023). Conserving the Origin of Rivers: Intact Forested Watersheds in Western Patagonia. In: Castilla, J.C., Armesto Zamudio, J.J., Martínez-Harms, M.J., Tecklin, D. (eds) Conservation in Chilean Patagonia. Integrated Science, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39408-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39408-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39407-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39408-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)