Abstract
Chapters 14, 15, 16 and 17 form Part IV, which analyses the IBE’s quest for universality, the difficulties it encountered and the contradictions these led it into. This chapter analyses the complex path towards universality presenting the countries participating in the IBE’s thematic surveys, the drafting of a national report for the Yearbook and the countries represented at the International Conferences. Quantitatively, the IBE was rapidly approaching the goal of universality but large regions were absent due to colonialism. The IBE was aware of the problem but refrained from intervening, always focused on its political neutrality. It was the colonial liberation movement itself that created the conditions for a more effective universality.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
The purpose of this chapter and chapter 15 is to examine the evolution of the countries interacting with the IBE over time. We distinguish four main possibilities for interaction:Footnote 1 participation in the IBE’s thematic surveys, the drafting of a national report for the Yearbook, representation at Conferences and membership of the Bureau. In this chapter, we focus on the first three possibilities: to what degree did they conform or not to the IBE’s objective universality (even partially)? What configurations did this universality take according to the context and time? In Chap. 15, we will analyse in detail the fourth possibility: the evolution of IBE membership, which had other implications.
Steady Growth in the Number of Countries Interacting with the IBE
Figure 14.1 summarises the number of countries active within the IBE from 1934—the date of the effective establishment of the ICPEs—to 1968, the end of Piaget’s reign.Footnote 2 We do not include the period of the Second World War when many activities were suspended (ICPEs, publication of the Yearbooks), even though the IBE continued its surveys and exchanges, but in other formats.Footnote 3
We observe a comparable increase in three of the four types of interaction: participation in surveys and national reports for the Yearbook and representations to the ICPEs, which roughly double from 1934 to 1968. The curves are relatively close to each other. Equally constant is the gap between the number of memberships, the fourth indicator and the other activities: it always remained lower, even if the curve followed a more notable rise than the others from the 1960s onwards, as we shall see later (Image 14.1).
A More Inclusive Universality
We can therefore see growth in the first three types of interaction. However, this should be put into perspective from the outset, since many regions of the world are not represented, which testifies to the IBE’s difficulty in achieving real universality. The members of the Secretariats and the main bodies of the Bureau were aware of this from the start and regularly identified countries with which they wished to intensify their relations. With this in mind, let us examine the different phases of this evolution on the world map.
Participation in IBE activities was at a relatively high level from the beginning. Some forty countries met at the first ICPEs and as many responded to the surveys; even more provided national reports. The 1935 survey on primary teacher training, discussed at the ICPE received as many as 64 replies; in 1938 and 1939, sixty and fifty-nine countries respectively provided a report for the Yearbooks. We note that at that time this represented almost all the so-called sovereign countries that maintained diplomatic relations.Footnote 4 From this point of view, universality seems to have been almost achieved; the delegations themselves noted this throughout the ICPEs and declared themselves delighted with it. Surveys and Yearbooks attracted ministries from all over the world and also led them to participate in ICPEs insofar as it was economically and technically possible for them; the countries that least attended the conferences were from Latin America, for just such reasons.Footnote 5
Let us not deceive ourselves: the limitations of this ‘universality’ are apparent from a geopolitical analysis: thirty European and nineteen Latin American countries make up the majority of the countries, plus the United States and Canada and eight Asian countries (including the ‘giants’ India, still under British rule, China and Japan). With the exception of the Union of South Africa, which was dominated by white settlers, the whole of South-East Asia, a large part of the Middle East and the whole of sub-Saharan Africa were absent: that is, the regions colonised by Europeans.Footnote 6
After the Second World War, despite sustained cooperation with UNESCO, curiously the number of participants in IBE activities did not exceed the pre-war level and even decreased in the Yearbooks: there was a stagnation, or even a decline, from the point of view of world representativeness, since the total number of countries had increased in the post-war period, in particular thanks to their winning independence especially in Asia.Footnote 7 Put another way, if considered in terms of the percentage of sovereign countries represented, universality was even more incomplete than before. Among the reasons for this were irregular participation, notably by a number of particularly disadvantaged Latin American states, such as Paraguay, Haiti and Honduras, plus the absence of the communist bloc countries which boycotted a number of international organisations, including the IBE between 1950 and 1953.Footnote 8
From the 1950s onwards, the number of states participating in the IBE’s activities took off again. The organisers were delighted with this development:
This year, the conference realizes a decisive step towards universality, since several countries that never participated took part for the first time in the work of the Conference and others, absent since 1950, once more took their place in participating. (ICPE, 1954, p. 9)
Several newly independent Asian, Near and Middle Eastern and North African countries now became active in the IBE.Footnote 9 Moreover, after Stalin’s death, the communist countries returned to the IBE, just as they also reversed their policy towards other international organisations.Footnote 10 This beginning of a take-off was confirmed in the second half of the 1950s, thanks to the spread of independence movements in the Near and Middle East, in North Africa and, more tentatively, in sub-Saharan Africa.
At the beginning of the 1960s, there was a real leap forward, both quantitatively and geographically: twenty-five African countries were by now active in the IBE.Footnote 11 The year 1965 was a kind of culmination:Footnote 12 105 countries took part in the survey on modern languages, ninety-six in the ICPE, ninety-three in the Yearbook. The twenty or so countries which did not respond to the invitation were among those which, due to a lack of resources, collaborated once in every two or three occasions; and there was still the problem of the non-invited countries of the communist bloc, as we shall see. These developments show that the IBE had in reality almost achieved its goal of universality (as it understood it), allowing it to rely on data provided by a large majority of the world’s existing governments.
Despite this obvious success, relatively few countries had become members of the IBE: how can this be explained?
Notes
- 1.
We therefore do not take exhibitions into account here, nor occasional scientific collaborations, such as contributions to Bulletins, requests for information, translations, reciprocal invitations, conferences, etc.
- 2.
See also Appendix C, which presents the countries that participated at least one time in an ICPE and the number of times they did so.
- 3.
See Chap. 5.
- 4.
See in particular Gleditsch and Ward (1999), and more recently Butcher and Griffiths (2020) who define a “state” as follows: “(1) A population of at least 10,000. (2) Autonomy over a specific territory. (3) Sovereignty that is either uncontested or acknowledged by the relevant international actors” (p. 295).
- 5.
For an analysis of the interactions between Latin American countries and the IBE and the reasons for their active participation, see Loureiro (forthcoming). Extending the investigations conducted by Dumont (2020), she shows in particular that on the Geneva scene the promotion of Latin American countries was an integral part of the development of multilateralism.
- 6.
Conversely, let us recall that, in a survey carried out by the IBE for the ILO in 1927–1928, the Secretary General of the Bureau, Marie Butts, addressed not only the educational authorities of 69 countries, but also those of colonised countries and those under the protectorate of Great Britain, Belgium, France, Spain, Italy and Portugal. B.2.0-42, A-IBE. This testifies to the possibilities of investigating these territories, albeit sometimes with great difficulty.
- 7.
According to the list in Gleditsch and Ward (1999), these were Bhutan, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Israel, Jordan, North and South Korea, Lebanon, Burma, Pakistan, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Syria, Taiwan.
- 8.
Countries were withdrawing from many other international organisations; Kott (2021, p. 55). Added to this was the disappearance of the Baltic countries, absorbed by the USSR, but this does not affect the percentage with regard to the sovereign countries represented since they were not considered as sovereign any more.
- 9.
In chronological order: Lebanon, Honduras, Syria, Burma, Ceylon, Pakistan, Israel, Monaco, the Philippines, Cambodia, Korea, Laos, Vietnam, Indonesia, Jordan.
- 10.
- 11.
The process of decolonisation in Africa and the study of Africa are examined by Clapham (2020), Hargreaves (2014) and Jeppesen and Smith (2017). For an analysis focusing on the whole of the twentieth century, and wider cultural areas but with a clear focus on education: Desgrandchamps and Matasci (2020) and Caruso and Maul (2020).
- 12.
Referred to in Chap. 6, but this “culmination” can also be interpreted as a swan song.
References
Archibald, G. (1993). Les États-Unis et l’Unesco, 1944–1963. Publications de la Sorbonne.
Butcher, C. R., & Griffiths, R. D. (2020). States and their international relations since 1816: Introducing version 2 of the International System(s) Dataset (ISD). International Interactions, 46(2), 291–308.
Caruso, M., & Maul, D. (2020). Decolonization(s) and education: New polities and new men. Peter Lang.
Clapham, C. (2020). Decolonising African studies? The Journal of Modern African Studies, 58(1), 137–153.
Desgrandchamps, M.-L., & Matasci, D. (Eds.). (2020). De la ‘mission civilisatrice’ à l’aide internationale dans les pays du Sud: acteurs, pratiques et reconfigurations au XXe siècle. Histoire@Politique. Politique, culture, société, 41.
Dumont, J. (2020). Le panaméricanisme, creuset et carrefour de l’internationalisme éducatif (1917–1945). Relations internationales, 183, 113–136.
Gajduk, I. V. (2012). Divided together: The United States and the Soviet Union in the United Nations, 1945–1965. Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. D. (1999). A revised list of independent states since the Congress of Vienna. International Interactions, 25(4), 393–413.
Hargreaves, J. D. (2014). Decolonization in Africa. Routledge.
Jeppesen, C., & Smith, A. W. M. (Eds.). (2017). Britain, France and the decolonization of Africa: Future imperfect? UCL Press.
Kott, S. (2021). Organiser le monde. Une autre histoire de la guerre froide. Seuil.
Loureiro, C. (forthcoming). La coopération pédagogique promue par le Bureau international d’éducation (BIE): les interconnexions avec l’Amérique latine (1925–1952) [Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Geneva].
Maurel, C. (2006). L’UNESCO de 1945 à 1974 [Unpublished doctoral thesis, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris]. https://hal.science/tel-00848712v1
Porter, L. H. (2018). Cold war internationalisms: The USSR in UNESCO, 1945–1967 [Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]. https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/concern/dissertations/f7623d391
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hofstetter, R., Schneuwly, B. (2024). Towards a Universality of Voices. In: The International Bureau of Education (1925-1968). Global Histories of Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41308-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41308-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41307-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41308-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)