Abstract
This book chapter explores the utilization of an ontology of disaster images in the design of a decision support system for intervening in prevention or reconstruction efforts following events such as earthquakes, floods, and even fires. Grounded in philosophy, ontology in computer science relies on taxonomies, which are classifications of concepts used to facilitate object-oriented programming. To this end, existing collections of disaster images have been analyzed based on relevant literature. The objective here is to map the perception of disasters across different groups, including experts, the passive public, and actively affected individuals. These stakeholders play a crucial role in decision-making within a participatory planning framework, with the most advanced form being strategic planning. This approach offers an alternative to traditional urban regulatory and landscape planning. Urban planning and land use are essential considerations for non-structural disaster prevention interventions, particularly in areas where urban and wildland environments intersect. In such contexts, the coexistence of human settlements and forests in urban settings emphasizes the dual nature of forests as both natural heritage and a domain that calls for nature-based solutions.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Keywords
1 Introduction
The vulnerability of urban or rur-urban areas, particularly at the urban–rural border, should be closely linked to the fragility of the sensitive quasi-/semi-natural, anthropic/constructed, and cultural landscape. This connection becomes essential when researching and planning for complex hazards, which involve combinations of factors that can exponentially increase cumulative risks (Crăciun, 2014). In 2010, a grant from the Canadian Centre for Architecture (CCA) supported research into the photographic expressions found in the CCA's collection of images depicting earthquakes, floods, fires, and even armed conflicts (Bostenaru, 2011a). The project seeks to establish a fresh perspective on the CCA’s collection images in this thematic context, following several years of research. Most of these photographs are now available in digital format. Consequently, these photographs serve as a means to preserve and capture the moment of catastrophe in a way that the physical ruins themselves cannot.
The Romantic Movement’s penchant for depicting ruins in art brought a focus on nineteenth century photography of such events. This exploration drew from the archives of the Canadian Centre for Architecture in Montreal, Canada. It aimed to juxtapose the perspectives of the past with contemporary views on the same issues, leveraging digital tools to do so. The photographers who contributed to this collection are also documented in nineteenth century photography history books held by the CCA. The analysis utilized a range of works from the collection, including those by Hannavy (2007), Blau and Kaufman (1989), van Veen (2010), Klett (2006), (1871), Barnard (1872), Peabody et al. (1899), Palazzoli (1981), Taylor (2007), Harris (1993), as well as a later exhibition by Bigiotti and Corvino (2015) and the book by Birken (2018) on the topic.
Numerous authors have explored the role of nature-based solutions and land use (Butsic et al., 2015; Chas-Amil et al., 2012; Galliana-Martin, 2017; Hanberry, 2020; Monteiro & Tavares, 2015; Nickayin et al., 2020; Parker, 2020; Price & Bradstock, 2013) in wildfire hazard prevention at the urban–wildland interface as non-structural measures in disaster risk management (Gociman, 2000). This book chapter proposes classifying and mapping these solutions using photography to facilitate related decision-making. However, among international photographic collections, the CCA stands out as a unique resource, even when compared to institutions like the Getty Museum, research and conservation institutes of foundations (https://www.getty.edu/art/collection/search?size=48&view=grid&q=fire), or ICCROM (the “International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property” in Rome), which house several national resources of photographic collections. These include foreign academies like the British School at Rome (https://digitalcollections.bsr.ac.uk/islandora/search/fire?type=dismax), where a course on the Glasgow Library fire was held on May 9, 2016 (https://www.gsa.ac.uk/life/gsa-events/events/r/rising-from-the-ashes/?source=filter&type=27676/mackintosh)—an event attended by the first author. Other institutions, such as the American Academy in Rome (https://dhc.aarome.org/islandora/search/fire?type=dismax), and the collection at Bibliotheca Hertziana (https://foto.biblhertz.it/ete?action=queryFotos&desc=feuer+&refine=Suchen), have also contributed to the field. The CCA library’s collection of books on the subject was also reviewed. An initial attempt to map these disasters is presented in Fig. 1.
The databases and collections included in Fig. 1 are as follows:
-
The session series “Natural hazards’ impact on urban areas and infrastructure,” convened and co-convened by the first author over a period of 20 years at the European Geosciences General Assembly (1999–2000 convened by Friedemann Wenzel, 2001–2010 chaired and convened by the first author, see Bostenaru, 2011b). This series continued in 2023 after being co-convened by the first author as “Natural hazard impacts on technological systems and infrastructures” from 2013 to 2022 (for an overview, see session materials at https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/session/34881).
-
Reviews of students supervised by the author as part of the course “Protection of settlements against risks” at the “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism. These reviews covered fires in the Mediterranean, Australia, and California and were presented at the COST action CA18135 webinar on May 5, 2021.
-
A collection of historical photographs from the nineteenth century depicting various natural and man-made hazards, including fires (as shown in Table 1), sourced from the CCA.
-
A collection derived from the exhibition and book on “Images of Disasters” (German research, Wieczorek et al., 2014), which includes major disasters throughout human history, providing an alternative to drawings through the use of photography.
-
Another collection from one of the books, “Illustrated History of Natural Disasters” (Kozák & Černák, 2010), which covers major disasters from the dawn of civilization, similarly offering photographic representations.
-
Additional works on architecture and catastrophes that were reviewed include “Tickle Your Catastrophe!” (Le Roy et al., 2011), based on the peer-reviewed proceedings of the conference with the same name held on March 6–7, 2009, in Ghent, Belgium. This conference included former CCA curator Dirk de Meyer.
A mapping of disasters is available as an app at http://www.arcgis.com/apps/Viewer/index.html?appid=6092a2d378404d6faab09b44a85f0aa2. This mapping draws a comparison between disasters mentioned in the CCA collection and those in various collections of disaster images, including books, exhibitions, or other visual data sources. This analysis is related to the examination of artistic photography using a method inspired by art historian René Berger (1963) for paintings and applied to cities by Kevin Lynch (1960). Berger’s book primarily analyzes paintings, but the method, focused on understanding proportions and composition elements, can be applied to any type of image, including photographs. Lynch’s work, on the other hand, mapped the perception of urban areas by categorizing elements of urban texture into landmarks, zones, paths, edges, and nodes. These categories are used to create mental maps when navigating a city.
Lynch’s method has been adapted for landscapes by Popa (2014), making it suitable for aerial views, which constitute a significant portion of the images in the CCA collection. Popa (2014) views photography as a tool for preserving the memory and identity of landscapes, encompassing both natural and urban environments. This adaptability makes it suitable for analyzing urban landscapes affected by disasters, where visible changes are often documented in before-and-after photographs. Mental maps play a crucial role in risk perception, particularly in post-disaster reconstruction efforts, where preserving the heritage habitat (as defined by Gociman, 2000) is a priority. Another related mapping method from the 1950s, developed by Guy Debord (1955), laid the foundation for psycho-geography. This method is still used in contemporary urban analyses, including those within the COST action 18,126, in which the first author is involved. The upcoming steps in the analysis, as shown in Fig. 2, follow an ontology previously developed by the author (published in Bostenaru, 2011a) and are based on the elements of nature that cause disasters, as explained later.
2 Ontologies Review
Rehbein (2017) discusses the modeling of data in ontologies in a digital humanities textbook. Another approach by Timothy Tambassi (2018, 2021) establishes a connection between ontologies in philosophy and those in computer science. Within the domain of geo-ontologies, philosophical considerations related to mapping are explored. In the context of urban studies, the COST Transport and Urban Development Action C21, known as “Towntology—Urban Ontologies for Improved Communication in Urban Civil Engineering Projects,” has addressed urban ontologies. Simultaneously, several ontologies have been developed for the field of architecture. An early effort by Sandaker (2010) focuses on the ontological representation of structures, a topic also relevant to disaster management given that structural failures are a primary cause of building collapses during disasters. This ontological approach was even integrated into doctoral courses, such as E-ArchiDoct’s Virtual Campus on post-master Studies in Architecture, a collaborative project involving 14 European Schools of Architecture, including the university of the authors and the Oslo School of Architecture and Design. Sandaker presented related content during the “Structures and Architecture” conference in Guimaraes, Portugal, in July 2010.
Cacciotti et al. (2013) explored how monuments’ documentation can be represented using ontologies. This approach extended to Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Heritage Building Information Modeling (H-BIM), addressing monument damage information modeling within a system. Tibaut et al. (2018) also investigated how collections can be transformed into databases using ontologies, focusing on heritage buildings but excluding the disaster dimension.
These ontological approaches primarily focus on data modeling for interventions in existing buildings. However, it is worth noting that ontologies can also be applied to new building projects, as demonstrated by Pauwels et al. (2009).
The first author has contributed to several ontologies in various contexts. In the COST TU0801 project, titled “Semantic Enrichment of 3D City Models for Sustainable Urban Development,” different 3-D models were analyzed to find an optimal solution for the city of Lisbon. Additionally, within the Network for Digital Methods in Arts and Humanities, a European Science Foundation research network, the NeDiMAH ontology working group was established, and the NeDiMAH Methods Ontology (http://nedimah.dcu.gr/) was developed.
In a recent COST network focused on Underground Built Heritage, the EU project HERACLES ontology (Hellmund et al., 2018), which addresses climate change disaster mitigation, was examined. An ontology was also created to organize disaster images (Bostenaru, 2011a). Furthermore, cost modeling for retrofitting in disaster prevention or post-disaster scenarios was centralized within VuWiki (Khazai et al., 2014), a Wiki platform for vulnerability information developed for the Global Earthquake Model socioeconomic component (https://storage.globalquakemodel.org/what/physical-integrated-risk/socio-economic-vulnerability/). Another contribution to the Global Earthquake Model involved the GEM Building Taxonomy Version 2.0 (https://www.globalquakemodel.org/single-post/2017/05/17/GEM-Building-Taxonomy-Version-20). This contribution entailed converting reports from the World Housing Encyclopedia initiative of the Earthquake Engineering Institute, which managed this component, into the taxonomy format. During this conversion process, the World Housing Encyclopedia’s questionnaire was transformed into a taxonomy to serve as a foundational component for an ontology.
3 Results
Wildfires that affect urban areas are a critical subject within the broader field of vegetation fires, particularly forest fires. In English, they are commonly referred to as wildland fires in the wildland–urban interface (WUI). This interface represents the region where construction, especially residential development, is situated within or close to flammable vegetation. It is the area where wildfires pose the most significant risk to human populations, making it highly vulnerable due to the potential for human casualties. In many Central European countries, this specific topic has not received extensive research attention. While the risk in these regions is generally lower compared to Mediterranean countries, there are still areas that could be affected by wildfires, such as cities in Romania (e.g., Brașov, Piatra Neamț). Typically, these areas consist of clustered urban development with less interspersion with forests. Nevertheless, the potential risk exists and offers a valuable avenue for research (Lorenţ et al., 2018, 2022; Mallinis et al., 2019).
The National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea” (INCDS) has included general protection measures against these fires in the Simplified Procedure conducted as part of The Romanian Operational Programme “Administrative Capacity,” a structural instrument in forestry (SIPOCA 395 Project, 2021). This program, which implements the European Social Fund (ESF) during the 2014–2020 period, focuses on “The implementation and development of common systems and standards to optimize decision-making processes in the field of water and forests.” It aims to apply an evidence-based approach to policymaking in the Ministry of Water and Forests and to systematize and simplify legislation related to water and reduce administrative burdens for businesses operating in the forestry sector. This program also addresses the interface area between the natural and built environment.
From an urban planning perspective, fires occurring at the urban–wildland interface impact the urban periphery. The Landscape Forum Le Notre dedicates a whole section to the urban periphery, and Stan (2013) discussed its current state. During the Modern Movement, the urban periphery gained special significance with the development of “Siedlungen,” a German term referring to groups of small housing buildings located in the outskirts of cities. This approach not only introduced a new urban planning paradigm but also had implications for fire hazards. Unlike traditional urban blocks, the “Zeilenbau” concept emerged, characterized by the arrangement of long, narrow residential buildings perpendicular to the main street, each self-standing within green spaces. This layout had a different impact on the spread of fires due to the arrangement of buildings in relation to each other and to surrounding vegetation. While notable fires have affected individual buildings, including those from various architectural eras like the Middle Ages and Art Nouveau, urban fires capable of affecting entire areas, which can now be simulated thanks to increased computing power, can also be caused by wildfires. Urban and territorial strategies applied to landscape planning can effectively contribute to the resilience of complex integrated landscapes, encompassing quasi-/semi-natural, anthropic, and cultural elements. These landscapes can serve as both promoters and models for intervention strategies, representing a unique institutional form of urban and territorial management and planning (Crăciun, 2010).
Today, we are witnessing processes through which it is necessary to foresee possible “Black Swan” type events (Taleb, 2007) and to integrate vulnerabilities and the impact of the highly improbable, in the process of strategic planning of complex hazards, both at the European, regional, cross-border or territorial level, and at the local level of detail, on spatial urban design and landscape planning research, study, projects, and strategic regulations (Crăciun, 2021). The identification of areas with potential risk and the impact on the landscape and the urban life framework is necessary to be based on a specific methodology (Crăciun, 2009–2012, Fig. 3) of vulnerabilities to minimize the possible risks and identify the specific types of hazard and vulnerabilities relevant to the processes of territorial and urban development in landscape (Crăciun, 2013).
A decision ontology is building on these approaches with ontology for buildings in case of disasters (Fig. 4).
Papalou and Baros (2019), Mikkola (2008), and Papathoma-Köhle et al (2022) have provided valuable insights into how criteria weighting in decision trees can be performed. Papalou and Baros (2019) extend the common post-disaster rapid visual screening method, primarily used for earthquakes, to include fire hazards. They provide an example from a 2018 fire in Greece, assessing its impact on various building types, including concrete, masonry, timber, and steel skeleton structures. This approach, which considers structures based on their material composition, is a characteristic feature of the rapid visual screening method. Mikkola (2008) also takes into account building materials but, prior to that, explores the effects of wildfires on buildings located at the urban–wildland interface. Drawing insights from a European project, this research not only examines how fires affect buildings and building materials but also investigates the mechanisms by which fires propagate toward buildings. It is worth noting that this research delves into impact assessment, a topic also covered in the mapped European Geosciences Union session. Additionally, the seminar works of students in the course have been included in the overview mapped in Fig. 1. Some of these presentations specifically focus on fires in the Mediterranean region, the USA (California), and Australia, aligning with the themes introduced by Papathoma-Köhle et al (2022).
Papathoma-Köhle et al (2022) emphasize the significance of the urban–wildland interface in the context of decision-making, aligning with the objective of this taxonomy. They also note that research on the vulnerability of the built environment to wildfires has been limited. To develop indices, they draw on a well-documented wildfire event, including one that occurred in Greece in 2018. Their approach differs from the papers discussed earlier in that, in addition to structural type and building material—the literature review on physical vulnerability indexes also incorporates other factors like roof type. Moreover, they consider the relationship between buildings and their surroundings to assess the response of buildings to wildfires.
Figure 4b in our ontology primarily focuses on the surroundings, while rapid visual screening, as presented by Bektaş and Kegyes-Brassai (2022), is integrated into the multihazard ontology depicted in Fig. 4a. Future approaches should also consider interior furnishings, as highlighted in the discussion by Papathoma-Köhle et al (2022). Although we have partially addressed emergency response aspects in our work, they remain essential considerations.
Rapid visual screening can be adapted to different geographic regions based on architectural characteristics, as demonstrated in projects like Risk-UE for the Mediterranean region and Romania (Mouroux & Le Brun, 2008). Regarding the ontology section related to the building–surroundings relationship at the urban–wildland interface, we have developed weighting and indices, as required by the ontology. To determine these, we utilized the AHP MCDM method proposed by Saaty (1980). By categorizing vulnerability indicators into the two blocks, as also done by Papathoma-Köhle et al. (2022), our method covers a more extensive range of criteria—four times more. These criteria are grouped within the stakeholders’ decision tree, streamlining the decision-making process. Ultimately, this decision-making process aids in retrofitting efforts, and some of the reviewed papers, including our method, can be instrumental in conducting cost–benefit analyses.
4 Conclusion and Final Remarks
We have examined the general approach to nineteenth century photography of disasters, encompassing urban photography series, stereo photography (as featured in scholars’ selections), and the contemporary use of historic photographs in before-and-after comparisons. Numerous digital humanities centers house collections of catastrophe photographs, including those associated with foreign institutions in Rome, such as the Bibliotheca Hertziana, American Academy in Rome, and British School in Rome. The digital art history initiatives of the Getty Foundation have also sponsored courses on methods for working with images. Analyzing these images represents just one facet of a more comprehensive research project. As part of this project, the author intends to analyze their own images of endangered or resilient buildings using image analysis techniques such as mapping (including network mapping) and image annotation (using tools like ImagePlot, Netline, and Palladio). An ontology proves invaluable for categorizing images within a collection and organizing them into a database.
Increasingly, European projects are developing computer-supported decision systems to address climate change and the impact of other disasters on built and natural heritage. Recent examples include STORM, HERACLES, and ongoing projects like ARCH, SHELTER, and HYPERION, among others. In most cases, the starting point for designing these computer systems, often involving Internet of Things (IoT) approaches, is the ontology. In the author’s project, the aim is to utilize images of monuments and sites from the first half of the twentieth century to draw lessons from vernacular architecture, which had a historically proven eco-adaptation. These lessons will inform the design of locally adapted retrofit solutions to mitigate hazards like wildfires in contemporary global contexts. During that period, the challenge was to build affordably and socially, leading to constructions in peripheral areas near forests. Today, environmental concerns drive change, with nature-based solutions being particularly relevant for addressing fire disasters, whether in urban settings adjacent to forests or in eco-architectural designs to protect materials from heat. This approach covers both aspects of the decision system we propose.
References
Barnard, G. N. (1872). The Lakeside Memorial of the burning of Chicago, A.D. 1871. With Illustrations. The University Publishing Company.
Berger, R. (1963). Discovery of painting (A studio book). Viking Press.
Bektaş, N., & Kegyes-Brassai, O. (2022). Conventional RVS methods for seismic risk assessment for estimating the current situation of existing buildings: A state-of-the-art review. Sustainability, 14(5), 2583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052583
Bigiotti, S., & Corvino, E. (2015). La modernità delle rovine. Temi e figure dell'architettura contemporanea. Prospettive Edizioni.
Birken, J. (2018). Die kalifornische Institution: Fernwestliche Weltbilder um 1906. arthistoricum.net (Dissertationen der Staatlichen Hochschule für Gestaltung Karlsruhe, Band 1). https://doi.org/10.11588/arthistoricum.415
Blau, E., & Kaufman, E. (1989). Architecture and its image: four centuries of architectural representation: Works from the collection of the Canadian Centre of Architecture, Centre Canadien d'Architecture/Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montreal.
Bostenaru Dan, M., & Armas, I. (2015). Earthquake impact on settlements: The role of urban and structural morphology. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15, 2283–2297. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2283-2015
Boștenaru-Dan, M., & Gociman, C. O. (2016). Map of impact of natural hazards. Journal of Urban and Landscape Planning, 1(1), 69‒77. https://doi.org/10.54508/JULP.01.06
Bostenaru Dan, M. (2011a). The use of ontology for digital conservation of architecture works after catastrophes. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences, 1/14(2), 11‒18.
Bostenaru Dan, M. (2011b). The session series on “Natural Hazards’ impact on urban areas and infrastructure”. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 10, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-011-9231-1
Butsic, V., Kelly, M., & Moritz, M. A. (2015). Land use and wildfire: A review of local interactions and teleconnections. Land, 4(1), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.3390/land4010140
Cacciotti, R., Valach, J., Kuneš, P., Cernanský, M., Blasko, M., & Kremen, P. (2013). Monument Damage Information System (Mondis): An Ontological Approach to Cultural Heritage Documentation. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, II-5/W1, 55‒60. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W1-55-2013
Chas-Amil, M. L., García-Martínez, E., & Touza, J. (2012). Fire risk at the wildland-urban interface: A case study of a Galician county. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 158, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.2495/FIVA120151
Crăciun, C. (2009‒2012). New Methodological Integrate Complex Research of the Macro-and Mezzo-Scalar Level of the Natural, Anthropic and Cultural Landscape, Applied Research: Landscape Fundamental Study of Renaturation for Limiting Adverse Microclimatic Effects and Valuing the Economic and Tourist Potential of Brăila County, Center for Research, Design, Expertise and Consulting of Bucharest “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism, Vol. II, pp. 38 & 41, Vol. III, pp.112‒124. http://cjbraila.ro/dm/portal.nsf/52CD2C517E65FD6EC22580DF004B8CB2/$FILE/RezumatFINALToateFazeleCerasellaCraciun.pdf; The project was selected for participation in the exhibition and public presentation at the Romanian National Architecture Biennale 2018. https://www.uar-bna.ro/2018/proiecte/94/
Crăciun, C. (2010). The Landscape - as a ‘Promoter’ and ‘Model’ of an Intervention Strategy and a Unique Institutional form of Management, Amenajarea Teritoriului si Urbanismul. Association of Chief Architects from the Counties of Romania, X/3‒4, 77‒88.
Crăciun, C. (2013). Landscape Fundamental Study of Research of the configuration of Brăila-Galați Urban System and determination of the Territorial Profile and Major Development Projects. Center for Research, Design, Expertise and Consulting of Bucharest “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism.
Crăciun, C. (2014). The vulnerability of fragile landscape and complex hazards. Areas with potential risks and specific types of hazards and vulnerabilities of the natural, anthropic and cultural landscape in Braila County, Romania. Earthquake hazard impact and urban planning, Environmental Hazards, pp. 67‒81. Springer, ISBN 978–94–007–7980–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7981-5
Crăciun, C. (2021). Lecture Conference: Assault the landscape as a Complex Hazard. Areas with potential risk and specific types of hazards and vulnerabilities specific to the Landscape. DISASTERPROTECT, UAUIM-FFCSU-2021–012: UAUIM’s research strategy against disasters in the field of natural and built heritage protection, of urban and rural areas. https://www.uauim.ro/evenimente/conferinta-disasterprotect/
Debord, G. (1955). Introduction to a Critique of Urban Geography. In K. Knabb Berkelye (Ed.), Situationist International. Bureau of Public Secrets.
Galiana-Martín, L. (2017). Spatial planning experiences for vulnerability reduction in the wildland-urban interface in Mediterranean European Countries. European Countryside, 9(3), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0034
Gociman, C. O. (2000). Tipologia Hazardului și Dezvoltarea Durabilă. Generalități, Concept, Problematică; “Ion Mincu”. Publishing House.
Hanberry, B. B. (2020). Reclassifying the wildland-urban interface using fire occurrences for the United States. Land, 9(7), 225.
Hannavy, J. (Ed.). (2007). Encyclopedia of nineteenth-century photography, vol. 1. Routledge.
Harris, D. (1993). Eadweard Muybridge and the photographic panorama of San Francisco, 1850–1880. MIT Press.
Hellmund, T., Hertweck, P., Hilbring, D., Mossgraber, J., Alexandrakis, G., Pouli, P., Siatou, A., & Padeletti, G. (2018). Introducing the HERACLES Ontology—Semantics for Cultural Heritage Management. Heritage, 1(2), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage1020026
Khazai, B., Kunz-Plapp, T., Büscher, Ch., & Wegner, A. (2014). VuWiki: An ontology-based semantic Wiki for vulnerability assessments. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 5(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-014-0010-9
Klett, M. (2006). After the ruins: 1906 and 2006 photographing the San Francisco earthquake and fire. University of California Press.
Kozák, J., & Černák, V. (2010). Illustrated history of natural disasters. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3325-3
Le Roy, F., Wynants, N., Hoens, D., & Vanderbeeken, R. (Eds.). (2011). Tickle Your Catastrophe!: Imagining Catastrophe in Art, Architecture and Philosophy (Studies in Performing Arts and Media), Academia.
López, F. J., Lerones, P. M., Llamas, J., Gómez-García-Bermejo, J., & Zalama, E. (2018). A Review of Heritage Building Information Modeling (H-BIM). Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(2), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2020021
Lorenţ, A., Neagu, Ș, Petrila, M., Apostol, B., Gancz, V., Mitsopoulos, I., & Mallinis, G. (2018). Evaluarea hazardului la incendii de pădure la nivel de unitate administrativ-teritorială în perioada 2006–2015. Revista Pădurilor, 133(4), 37–58.
Lorenț, A., Petrila, M., Gancz, V., Capalb, F., Apostol, B., & Badea, N.-O. (2022). Quick assessment of burn area and burn severity on black locust stands using Sentinel 2 imagery in South-West Romania. In D. X. Viegas & L. M. Ribeiro (Ed.), Advances in Forest Fire Research, pp. 1282–1291. University of Coimbra. https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-2298-9_194
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the City. The MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-62001-4.
Mallinis, G., Petrila, M., Mitsopoulos, I., Lorenţ, A., Neagu, Ş, Apostol, B., Gancz, V., Popa, I., & Goldammer, J. G. (2019). Geospatial Patterns and Drivers of Forest Fire Occurrence in Romania. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 12, 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-018-9269-3
Mikkola, E. (2008). Forest fire impacts on buildings. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 119(7), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.2495/FIVA080241
Monteiro, M., & Tavares, A. O. (2015). What is the influence of the planning framework on the land use change trajectories? Photo Interpretation Analysis in the 1958–2011 period for a medium/small sized city. Sustainability, 7(9), 11727–11755. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70911727
Mouroux, P., & Le Brun, B. (2008). Risk-UE Project: An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with application to different European towns, pp. 479‒508. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3608-8_2
Nickayin, S. S., Tomao, A., Quaranta, G., Salvati, L., & Gimenez Morera, A. (2020). Going toward resilience? Town planning, Peri-urban landscapes, and the expansion of Athens, Greece. Sustainability, 12(24), 10471. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410471
Papathoma-Köhle, M., Schlögl, M., Garlichs, C., Diakakis, M., Mavroulis, S., & Fuchs, S. (2022). A wildfire vulnerability index for buildings. Scientific Reports, 12, 6378. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10479-3
Palazzoli, D. (1981). Giorgio Sommer fotografo a Napoli. Electa Editrice.
Papalou, A., & Baros, D. K. (2019). Assessing structural damage after a severe wildfire: A case study. Buildings, 9(7), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9070171
Parker, J., Simpson, G. D., & Miller, J. E. (2020). Nature-based solutions forming urban intervention approaches to anthropogenic climate change: A quantitative literature review. Sustainability, 12(18), 7439. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187439
Pauwels, P., Verstraeten, R., De Meyer, R., & Van Campenhout, J. (2009). Semantics-based design can ontologies help in a preliminary design phase? Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 3(5), 263–276.
Peabody, H., White, J., French, W. A., & Clark, W. (1899). Catalogue of American Scenery and Architecture. Soule Photograph Company.
Popa, A. (2014). Photography as exercise of memory in order to reassess, recompose and revive landscapes. In C. Crăciun & M. Bostenaru Dan (Eds.), Planning and Designing Sustainable and Resilient Landscapes. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8536-5_5
Price, O. F., & Bradstock, R. A. (2013). The spatial domain of wildfire risk and response in the wildland urban interface in Sydney, Australia. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(12), 3385–3393. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3385-2013
Rehbein, M. (2017). Ontologien. In F. Jannidis, H. Kohle & M. Rehbein (Eds.), Digital Humanities, Section: Datenmodellierung. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05446-3_11
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarcy process. McGraw-Hill.
Sandaker, B. N. (2010). An Ontology of Structured Space. In P. J. da Sousa Cruz (Ed.), Structures and Architecture. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10428
SIPOCA 395 Project. (2021). The implementation and development of common systems and standards for the optimization of decision-making processes in the field of water and forests, the application of the system of evidence-based policies in the Ministry of Water and Forests for the systematization and simplification of legislation in the field of water and the implementation of simplified procedures to reduce the administrative burden for business environment in the field of forestry. MySMIS code 116294. National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea” (INCDS).
Stan, A. (2013). Morphological patterns of urban sprawl territories. Urbanism, Architecture, Constructions, 4(4), 11–24.
Taleb, N. N. (2007). The Black Swan: The impact of the highly improbable. Random House.
Tambassi, T. (2018). The philosophy of geo-ontologies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64033-4
Tambassi, T. (2021). The philosophy of geo-ontologies. Applied ontology of geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78145-3
Taylor, R. (2007). Impressed by Light. British photographs from Paper Negatives, 1840–1860. Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Tibaut, A., Kaucic, B., & Dvornik Perhavec, D. (2018). Ontology-based data collection for heritage buildings. In M. Ioannides (Eds.), Digital cultural heritage. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10605. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75826-8_6
van Veen, A. (2010). Amsterdam 1845‒1875: The first Photographs. Thoth Publishers.
Wieczorek, A., Schenk, G. J., Juneja, M., & Lind, Ch. (Eds.). (2014). Mensch. Natur. Katastrophe. Von Atlantis bis heute. Schnell und Steiner.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Exploratory research project “Future on the past,” funded by UEFISCDI Grant agreement no. PN-III-P4-PCE-2021-0609.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bostenaru Dan, M., Crăciun, C., Ibric, A. (2024). Decision Systems in Disaster Management with Application to Fire. In: Rodrigo-Comino, J., Salvati, L. (eds) Fire Hazards: Socio-economic and Regional Issues. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50446-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50446-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50445-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50446-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)