Abstract
Knowledge interactions—interactions between actors in which knowledge is shaped and communicated—are crucial to solving global challenges and lie at the centre of successful and sustainable international cooperation. The 2030 Agenda highlights the importance of including knowledge interaction as a central part of any collaborative project. The book addresses these issues by focusing on the following research question: How do development partners realise modalities of knowledge interaction?
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Keywords
- Knowledge
- Knowledge cooperation
- Knowledge interactions
- Development cooperation
- South–South cooperation
- Effectiveness
Knowledge cooperation is crucial to addressing global challenges and to achieving international agendas (Akude & Keijzer, 2014; Ayala Martínez, 2017; Freistein et al., 2022; Radhakrishnan, 2007). The COVID-19 pandemic has shown how relevant effective knowledge interactions are to enabling a quick response to emerging crises.
Knowledge cooperation has been used for decades as a modality in development cooperation. As such, it has often been framed as technical assistance and capacity development (Bandstein, 2007; ECLAC and OECD, 2018, p. 42). In contrast, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Development Assistance Committee (DAC) considers its own knowledge cooperation as the third pillar of development cooperation “complementing finance and technical assistance” (OECD, 2011). We, however, understand knowledge cooperation as the sum of different modalities of knowledge interaction, which serve as a toolbox to co-create, share and communicate knowledge among actors. The lack of a concise definition and stringent understanding of knowledge cooperation scatters the evidence base on the effectiveness of different modalities in knowledge-related activities. At the same time, there is an increasing need and interest in proving the effectiveness of development cooperation.
Knowledge cooperation increasingly attracts attention due to the rise of South–South cooperation (SSC). Some observers regard knowledge cooperation as the core of SSC or describe it at least as, to a very large extent, a main feature of what SSC agencies do (Chaturvedi et al., 2021; Costa Leite et al., 2021). Through SSC, there has also been a greater emphasis on, and call for, horizontal and demand-driven partnerships. Despite a concomitant shift in rhetoric, it remains open to question whether modalities of knowledge interaction have changed over time to achieve more equal power dynamics in international cooperation. We observe that the toolbox of modalities mainly remains the same (Ayala Martínez, 2017). This is why partners in the Global South are often not convinced that knowledge cooperation in the context of Official Development Assistance (ODA) is the most effective approach and why there is much more to learn from actors in the Global South (Klingebiel, 2014).
Therefore, following a collaborative research design, we want to contribute to this debate by creating case-by-case evidence with our partners: Rwanda Cooperation Initiative (RCI), Research and Information System for Developing Countries (RIS, India), UNDP Seoul Policy Centre (USPC) as well as three projects of the German Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) in Rwanda and India. The partners share similar mandates, such as the fostering of SSC and the idea that they can offer advice to stakeholders in other countries based on narratives of their own “development successes”.
Our partners were established at different times and in different contexts. While GIZ can be regarded as a traditional ODA development agency, USPC shares knowledge on facets of the Republic of Korea’s socio-economic development since the 1960s. RIS pursues SSC in the context of India as an emerging power, while Rwanda Cooperation Initiative is a newly established SSC agency based in Sub-Saharan Africa.
The collaborative validation of our findings with our partners was and is important to us for several reasons. Firstly, the power to define and interpret related topics is at the core of the issue itself and related to the question of who sets standards and norms in international relations. Secondly, taking this into account is an integral part of our understanding of how effectiveness dimensions should be developed jointly. Thirdly, this can build the basis for future engagement in inclusive fora towards a shared understanding of good practices. For these relevant processes, our book provides insights into the nature of modalities and indications for quality dimensions. We do so by answering the following research question and sub-questions:
-
1.
How do our partners realise modalities of knowledge interaction?
-
(a)
What are and what constitutes the different modalities of knowledge interaction of our partners?
-
(b)
What do we know about the effectiveness of knowledge cooperation of our partners?
-
(c)
How are modalities of knowledge interactions used by partners?
-
(a)
In answering these questions, our book’s contribution is two-fold: it makes both a conceptual and an empirical contribution. Chapter 2 lays the conceptual foundation by summarising the relationship between knowledge and power structures, defining knowledge interactions, and explaining our understanding of modalities of knowledge interaction, including the typology of modalities we have developed. Chapter 3 sets out the focus of our empirical work by delineating debates around the impact, effectiveness and evaluation of development cooperation, and by presenting the analytical framework we developed as our sensitising concept. In addition, we outline our collaborative case-study approach and explain our case selection. In Chapter 4, we introduce the methodological approach we took to data collection and analysis, before presenting our empirical findings in Chapter 5, on a case-by-case basis for RCI, RIS, USPC and the GIZ organisations. In Chapter 6 we summarise our empirical findings across all cases, regarding the constitution of the modalities of knowledge interactions, the effectiveness of knowledge cooperation, and the functions of modalities of knowledge interaction. In our conclusion (Chapter 7) we summarise the overall learnings and provide an overarching perspective on knowledge interactions and power on the micro- and macro-levels, on the effectiveness framework and on knowledge cooperation as such—as a new pillar of international cooperation.
Throughout the research process, we ascribe an important role to critical (self-)reflection. We provide more details about this dimension of the study in Appendix 1.
References
Akude, J. E., & Keijzer, N. (2014). Fit for the purpose? Juxtaposing global development policy discussions on knowledge-sharing with African realities. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 10(2), 33–47.
Ayala Martínez, C. (2017). Evolution of knowledge sharing: Increasing the potential of development actors in a challenging environment. In C. Ayala Martínez & U. Müller (Eds.), Towards horizontal cooperation and multi-partner collaboration: Knowledge sharing and development cooperation in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 19–42). Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845289427-1
Bandstein, S. (2007). What determines the choice of aid modalities? (Report 2007, Vol. 4). Expertgruppen för Biståndsanalys.
Chaturvedi, S., Janus, H., Klingebiel, S., Li, X., Mello e Souza, A. D., Sidiropoulos, E., & Wehrmann, D. (2021). The Palgrave handbook of development cooperation for achieving the 2030 Agenda: Contested collaboration. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57938-8
Costa Leite, I., Pomeroy, M., & Trajber Waisbich, L. (2021). Travelling across developing countries: Unpacking the role of South–South Cooperation and civil society in policy transfer. In O. Porto de Oliveira (Ed.), Handbook of policy transfer, diffusion and circulation (pp. 214–236). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789905601.00019
ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean)/OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2018). Emerging challenges and shifting paradigms. New perspectives on international cooperation for development. United Nations. https://hdl.handle.net/11362/44002
Freistein, K., Mahlert, B., Quack, S., & Unrau, C. (2022). Imaging pathways for global cooperation. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802205817
Klingebiel, S. (2014). Development cooperation: Challenges of the new aid architecture. Palgrave Macmillan.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2011). Busan partnership for effective development co-operation: Fourth high level forum on aid effectiveness, Busan, Republic of Korea, 29 November–1 December 2011. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/busan-partnership-for-effective-development-co-operation_54de7baa-en. Accessed December 8, 2021.
Radhakrishnan, S. (2007). Rethinking knowledge for development: Transnational knowledge professionals and the “new” India. Theory and Society, 36, 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9024-2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klingebiel, S. et al. (2024). Introduction. In: Exploring the Effectiveness of International Knowledge Cooperation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55704-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55704-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55703-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-55704-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)