Abstract
In the process of breeding and selection of banana for resistance to Fusarium wilt, it is important to conduct an efficient resistance screening test by artificial inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (Foc) Tropical Race 4. So far, there are two types of early bioassays for screening Musa genotypes against Foc: a greenhouse and an in vitro bioassay. The most commonly used greenhouse bioassay is a pot-based system followed by a hydroponic system. Here we describe an in vitro bioassay characterized by in vitro inoculation of rooted banana plantlets grown on medium consisting of half-strength MS macronutrients and MS micronutrients. The disease response and evaluation results obtained through this in vitro bioassay correlates with that from a greenhouse screen and/or field evaluation. Given the importance of in vitro cell and tissue culture techniques for banana (mutation) breeding, promising resistant clones could be screened directly. This in vitro bioassay is a totally contained system compared with greenhouse methods and does not require an acclimatization step, thereby improving banana breeding efficiency. The in vitro pre-screening protocol and bioassay for Fusarium wilt resistance presented here is fast, space-effective, and accurate.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Fusarium wilt or Panama disease caused by the pathogenic fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (Foc) is one of the most destructive diseases of banana and is found in all areas where banana is grown (Ploetz 2015). The soil-borne pathogen infects the roots of banana plants and colonizes the xylem vessels, which leads to typical external symptoms such as wilting and yellowing of the foliage, eventually leading to plant mortality. Currently, there is still a lack of economically viable measures for managing Fusarium wilt in an infected field (Dita et al. 2018). It is generally accepted that breeding and selection for disease resistance is the only effective and sustainable management option.
Promising resistant clones acquired through conventional and non-conventional breeding techniques should be screened for resistance to Fusarium wilt using artificial inoculation with Foc. So far, there are two types of early bioassays for screening Musa genotypes against Foc: a greenhouse and an in vitro bioassay (Wu et al. 2010; Ghag et al. 2012; Hu et al. 2013). The most commonly used greenhouse bioassay is a pot system (Dita et al. 2011; Ribeiro et al. 2011; Li et al. 2015; Reboucas et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2018; Zuo et al. 2018) followed by a hydroponic system.
Although some progress has been achieved, attempts at developing new banana genotypes resistant to Fusarium wilt using conventional breeding techniques face significant hurdles, mainly because most cultivars of Musa AAA Cavendish subgroup are sterile and seedless (Ortiz 2013). Nowadays, non-conventional breeding approaches for banana improvement such as somaclonal variation and genetic transformation have received more attention. Somaclonal variation caused by long-term in vitro propagation is considered an important source of genetic variability, through which several tolerant clones have been acquired (Hwang and Ko 2004). In addition, a genetic transformation protocol has been well established in different banana genotypes, which can be used to create transgenic plants resistant to Foc Tropical Race 4 (Foc TR4) (Dale et al. 2017). Given the fact that non-conventional breeding techniques are based on banana cell and tissue culture, promising resistant clones could be screened directly using an in vitro bioassay. Based on the modification of previous work (Wu et al. 2010), we present here a pre-screening protocol for Fusarium wilt resistance by using an in vitro bioassay that is fast, space-effective, and accurate.
The in vitro bioassay is characterized by in vitro inoculation of rooted banana plantlets grown in a half-strength MS medium without a carbon source. Twenty-four days after inoculation with Foc TR4 at 106 conidia/ml, the disease severity was rated on a scale from 1 to 6 (Wu et al. 2010). Results of the disease score were then subjected to ordinal logit model analysis, which is also known as proportional odds model (McCullagh 1980). According to symptom rating probability distribution, the reaction of banana genotypes against Fusarium wilt was divided into five categories: highly resistant (HR), resistant (R), moderately resistant (MR), susceptible (S), and highly susceptible (HS). Compared with the greenhouse bioassay, this in vitro bioassay is a totally closed system. Since acclimatization of in vitro plantlets is not required, the application of the bioassay improves banana breeding efficiency.
2 Materials
2.1 Medium for Interaction System (MIS)
-
1.
MS (Murashige and Skoog 1962) macronutrients and micronutrients (see Note 1).
-
2.
Tissue culture grade water.
-
3.
Gelling agent (e.g. agar).
-
4.
Analytical balance.
-
5.
Weighing trays.
-
6.
Spatula.
-
7.
Beakers (500Â ml and 1000Â ml).
-
8.
Magnetic stir bar.
-
9.
Hot plate.
-
10.
pH meter.
-
11.
NaOH (1Â N).
-
12.
HCl (1Â N).
-
13.
Erlenmeyer flasks (150Â ml).
-
14.
Ventilated sealing film for Erlenmeyer flask (12 × 12 cm).
-
15.
Rubber bands.
2.2 Plant Material Preparation
-
1.
High-quality in vitro plantlets which have been cultured on rooting medium for 2Â weeks (Wu et al. 2005).
-
2.
Sterile MIS medium.
-
3.
Forceps.
-
4.
Scalpel handle.
-
5.
Scalpel blades.
2.3 Inoculum Preparation
-
1.
Five-days-old PDA (potato dextrose agar) plate culture of Foc TR4 strain GD-13 (VCG 01213/16, ACCC 37997), which was isolated from a diseased Cavendish banana plant in Guangdong Province, PR China (see Note 2).
-
2.
Electron Microscopy Sciences (EMS) Rapid-Core (6.0Â mm).
-
3.
Potato Dextrose Water (ready-to-use).
-
4.
Erlenmeyer flask (500Â ml).
-
5.
Orbital shaker.
-
6.
Cheesecloth.
-
7.
Petri dishes.
-
8.
Short-stem funnel (60Â mm).
-
9.
Bottles (100Â ml).
-
10.
Beakers (500Â ml).
-
11.
Forceps.
-
12.
Haemocytometer.
2.4 In Vitro Inoculation
-
1.
Filter paper.
-
2.
Petri dish.
-
3.
Sterile distilled water.
-
4.
Sterile centrifuge tube (50Â ml).
-
5.
Beakers (100Â ml).
-
6.
Forceps.
-
7.
Disposable pipettes.
3 Methods (See Note 3)
3.1 Preparation of MIS Medium
-
1.
Prepare stock solutions of MS macronutrients (20×) and micronutrients (200×).
-
2.
For 1 liter of MIS medium, weigh 6Â g of agar in 400Â ml of tissue culture grade water.
-
3.
Heat while stirring until the solution is homogenous and clear.
-
4.
In a separate beaker containing 400Â ml water mix 25Â ml stock solution of MS macronutrients (20x) and 5Â ml stock solution of MS micronutrients (200x), stir the mixture.
-
5.
Mix the solution prepared in step 3 with the solution prepared in step 4.
-
6.
Add water to a final volume of 1 liter, while stirring adjust the pH to 5.8 using NaOH and HCl.
-
7.
Dispense 50Â ml of the medium into Erlenmeyer flasks.
-
8.
Close each Erlenmeyer flask over the top with a ventilated sealing film and a rubber band.
-
9.
Sterilize the medium for 20 min at 120 °C.
-
10.
Allow medium to cool prior to use.
-
11.
Store for up to a week in a cold room.
3.2 Plant Material Preparation
-
1.
Autoclave forceps and scalpel.
-
2.
In a laminar flow bench, remove the blackened part at the base of the rooted plantlets (the height of the pseudostem is 3.5–4.0 cm), shorten the roots to approximately 0.5 cm in length.
-
3.
Transfer plantlets into Erlenmeyer flasks containing MIS, one plantlet per flask.
-
4.
Maintain cultures at 25 ± 2 °C under a 12 h photoperiod with 50 μmol m−2 s−1 from cool white fluorescent lamps.
-
5.
After 1–2 weeks of growth, select plantlets for in vitro inoculation: the height of the pseudostem should measure 4.5–5.0 cm, and the plantlet should possess more than two fully expanded leaves and at least three white roots.
3.3 Inoculum Preparation
-
1.
Cut cheesecloth into round pieces (8Â cm) and then place in a glass Petri dish.
-
2.
Autoclave forceps, Erlenmeyer flask, Petri dish with cheesecloth pieces, short-stem funnel, bottle, and beaker.
-
3.
In a laminar flow bench, dispense 200Â ml of Potato Dextrose Water into Erlenmeyer flasks.
-
4.
Punch out 5 mycelial plugs from the outer edge of the actively growing colony of Foc TR4 strain and transfer into an Erlenmeyer flask containing Potato Dextrose Water.
-
5.
Place the Erlenmeyer flask on a rotary shaker (150 rpm) and incubate at 25 °C for 5 days.
-
6.
In a laminar flow bench, insert funnel into bottle, then place four layers of cheesecloth into funnel.
-
7.
Pour sporulation medium through four layers of cheesecloth to separate spores from mycelia.
-
8.
After filtration, place cheesecloth pieces and funnel into beaker.
-
9.
Determine conidia concentration in spore suspension using a haemocytometer.
-
10.
Store spore suspension at 4 °C until in vitro inoculation.
-
11.
Autoclave beaker with cheesecloth pieces and funnel.
-
12.
Allow beaker to cool prior to disposing cheesecloth pieces.
3.4 In Vitro Inoculation (See Fig. 3.1 and Note 4)
-
1.
Cut filter paper into small discs (5Â mm) and then place in a glass Petri dish.
-
2.
Autoclave forceps, Petri dish with filter paper discs, disposable pipettes, and beaker.
-
3.
In a laminar flow bench, adjust conidia concentration to 106 conidia/ml with sterile distilled water in a sterile centrifuge tube.
-
4.
Pour the spore suspension (106 conidia/ml) into a beaker, then soak the filter paper discs in the spore suspension.
-
5.
Inoculate each plantlet with Foc TR4 by placing one disc on the surface of the MIS medium.
-
6.
Maintain cultures at 25 ± 2 °C under a 12 h photoperiod with 50 μmol m−2 s−1 from cool white fluorescent lamps for 24 days.
-
7.
Autoclave beaker containing spore suspension for decontamination.
3.5 Disease Severity Rating and Statistical Analysis
-
1.
Rate disease severity of the in vitro inoculated plantlets on a scale of 1 to 6: 1, no discoloration of the pseudostem; 2, ≤ 1/2 the height of the pseudostem discolored; 3, >1/2 the height of the pseudostem discolored and (or) leaf stalk discolored; 4, ≤50% of the leaves wilted or yellowed; 5, >50% of the leaves wilted or yellowed; and 6, the whole plantlet wilted (see Fig. 3.2).
-
2.
After 24Â days incubation assess disease severity by determining disease score.
-
3.
Data collection: record the data for each banana plantlet and enter it into a spreadsheet (e.g. Microsoft Excel).
-
4.
Model construction based on cumulative Logistic regression (see Note 5). Wherein the Logistic regression model accordingly contains five logit functions:
Wherein p 1, p 2, p 3, p 4, p 5 and p 6 are event probabilities, which respectively represent disease grades of 1–6, and the basal level for comparison is grade 6; x k (k = 1,2…, K) represents banana cultivar; β 0j (j = 1,2…, 5) represents an intercept term of regression; and β k (k = 1,2…, K) represents a regression coefficient; each logit function has the same coefficient term and different intercept terms, and the regression lines of each cumulative logit are parallel to each other.
The estimation method used for the Logistic regression model is a maximum likelihood method, according to the aforementioned Logistic model function designed for predicting the disease severity of the rooted plantlet of banana, the accumulated Logistic regression model obtained is described as follows:
Wherein y’ represents the disease incidence of the rooted plantlet of banana, α represents an intercept term; β k (k = 1,2…, K) represents a regression coefficient; x k (k = 1,2…, K) represents banana cultivar, and ε is an error term.
-
5.
Calculation of cumulative probability: assigning respective values y = 1, y = 2,..., y = 6 to six disease grades, wherein a relationship among individual y values is (y = 1) < (y = 2) < … < (y = 6), and there are 5 demarcation lines for demarcating adjacent categories:
-
if y’ ≤ μ 1, y = 1
-
if μ 1 < y’ ≤ μ 2, y = 2
-
if μ 2 < y’ ≤ μ 3, y = 3
-
if μ 3 < y’ ≤ μ 4, y = 4
-
if μ 4 < y’ ≤ μ 5, y = 5
-
if μ 5 < y’, y = 6
μ j is a demarcation point for demarcating categories, and μ 1 < μ 2 < μ 3 < μ 4 < μ 5.
The formula for calculating a cumulative probability value is as follows:
Therefore, the probability value of the rooted plantlet of a banana cultivar in a certain disease grade can be obtained:
The sum of the probability values of each grade is 1, that is, P (y = 1) + P (y = 2) + … + P (y = 6) = 1.
-
6.
Open the spreadsheet at user interface of statistic software (e.g. IBM SPSS Statistics), then execute ordinal logit model analysis and obtain symptom rating probability distribution of each banana cultivar or clone. As an example, the result of statistical analysis is given in Fig. 3.3.
-
7.
Evaluate the disease resistance level of banana cultivars or clones according to their symptom rating probability distributions (see Table 3.1). As an example, the evaluation result is given in Table 3.2.
-
8.
Autoclave Erlenmeyer flasks with in vitro inoculated plantlets for decontamination (see Notes 6 and 7).
4 Notes
-
1.
MIS medium is composed of half-strength MS macronutrients and MS micronutrients without a carbon source. Media commonly used for the growth and sporulation of Foc are carbohydrate-rich, and carbon has been shown to be the first limiting substrate of Foc growth in sterilized soil (Couteaudier and Alabouvette 1990). In this bioassay, the subtle balance between the growth of Foc and the carbon source is achieved by removing sucrose from the MS medium and by employing a filter paper disc as carbon source. Since the rooted banana plantlets with leaves are able to photosynthesize, the use of MIS medium in this bioassay also guarantees the normal growth of the plantlets.
-
2.
CAUTION: it is suggested to use a virulent strain of Foc TR4. The disease severity of in vitro inoculated plantlets is affected by several factors, such as the pathogenicity of the Foc TR4 strain, sporulation medium, components of MIS medium, and growing time of banana plantlet on MIS medium before in vitro inoculation. Among these, the pathogenicity of Foc TR4 strain is the most important factor (Wu et al. 2020). If variation in pathogenicity occurs, for example, due to repeated sub-culturing or long-term preservation in the lab, this bioassay is not useful to identify banana mutants which are resistant to Fusarium wilt.
-
3.
CAUTION: not only plant material preparation but also inoculum preparation and inoculation of rooted banana plantlets are conducted under sterile conditions. In order to obtain reliable data of disease severity, it’s necessary to acquire the ability of aseptic operation prior to the experiment.
-
4.
Five plantlets of each cultivar are in vitro inoculated with Foc TR4, and the entire experiment is repeated three times (n = 15). Control plantlets are treated in the same manner except that filter paper discs are soaked in sterile distilled water.
-
5.
For field evaluation and greenhouse bioassay, the resistance of banana cultivars tested is generally divided into five levels according to a disease index. Because the disease grades of in vitro bioassay are non-linear in disease severity, the numerical value obtained by substituting the disease index calculation formula cannot reflect the real disease severity. That is, when there is no quantitative limit for disease grade, the disease index calculation formula is not applicable. The logistic regression model belongs to a probabilistic nonlinear regression model (McCullagh 1980). Using Logistic regression to analyze the disease grade data greatly improves the accuracy of the in vitro bioassay.
-
6.
The in vitro bioassay is a laboratory bioassay with effective containment conducted in a controlled environment. All experimental waste and materials must be autoclaved in order to prevent the spread of Fusarium wilt pathogen into the environment.
-
7.
Since tissue-cultured banana plantlets get easily contaminated during plant material preparation and in vitro inoculation, it is necessary to re-isolate Foc TR4 by cutting a thin cross-section of the rhizome from a diseased plantlet followed by placing the disc directly onto a PDA plate. Then the cultures are identified by following the procedures described by Summerell et al. (2003).
References
Couteaudier Y, Alabouvette C (1990) Survival and inoculum potential of conidia and chlamydospores of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lini in soil. Can J Microbiol 36(8):551–556
Dale J, James A, Paul JY, Khanna H, Smith M, Peraza-Echeverria S, Garcia-Bastidas F, Kema G, Waterhouse P, Mengersen K, Harding R (2017) Transgenic Cavendish bananas with resistance to Fusarium wilt tropical race 4. Nat Commun 8:1496
Dita MA, Waalwijk C, Paiva LV, Souza Jr MT, Kema GHJ (2011) A greenhouse bioassay for the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense x ‘Grand Naine’ (Musa, AAA, Cavendish subgroup) interaction. Acta Hortic 897:377–380
Dita M, Barquero M, Heck D, Mizubuti ESG, Staver CP (2018) Fusarium wilt of banana: current knowledge on epidemiology and research needs toward sustainable disease management. Front Plant Sci 9:1468
Ghag SB, Shekhawat UKS, Ganapathi TR (2012) Petunia floral defensins with unique prodomains as novel candidates for development of Fusarium wilt resistance in transgenic banana plants. PLoS One 7:e39557
Hu CH, Wei YR, Huang YH, Yi GJ (2013) An efficient protocol for the production of chit42 transgenic Furenzhi banana (Musa spp. AA group) resistant to Fusarium oxysporum. In Vitro Cellular Dev Biol Plant 49(5):584–592
Huang BZ, Xu LB, Yang H, Tang XL, Wei YR, Qiu JS, Li GQ (2005) Preliminary results of field evaluation of banana germplasm resistant to Fusarium wilt disease. Guangdong Agric Sci 32(6):9–10. (in Chinese)
Hwang SC, Ko WH (2004) Cavendish banana cultivars resistant to Fusarium wilt acquired through somaclonal variation in Taiwan. Plant Dis 88(6):580–588
Li WM, Dita M, Wu W, Hu GB, Xie JH, Ge XJ (2015) Resistance sources to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 in banana wild relatives. Plant Pathol 64(5):1061–1067
Liu SQ, Liang ZH, Huang ZH, Huang YX (2007) Selection of ‘Nongke No.1’ (Musa AAA Cavendish subgroup) resistant to Fusarium wilt. Guangdong Agric Sci 34(1):30–32. (in Chinese)
McCullagh P (1980) Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 42(2):109–142
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Ortiz R (2013) Conventional banana and plantain breeding. Acta Hortic 986:177–194
Ploetz RC (2015) Fusarium wilt of banana. Phytopathology 105(12):1512–1521
Reboucas TA, Haddad F, Ferreira CF, de Oliveira SAS, da Silva Ledo CA, Amorrim EP (2018) Identification of banana genotypes resistant to Fusarium wilt race 1 under field and greenhouse conditions. Sci Hortic 239:308–313
Ribeiro LR, Amorim EP, Cordeiro ZJM, de Oliveira e Silva S, Dita MA (2011) Discrimination of banana genotypes for Fusarium wilt resistance in the greenhouse. Acta Hortic 897:381–385
Summerell BA, Salleh B, Leslie JF (2003) A utilization approach to Fusarium identification. Plant Dis 87:117–128
Wu YL, Yi GJ, Yang H, Zhou BR, Zeng JW (2005) Basal medium with modified nitrogen source and other factors influence the rooting of banana. HortScience 40(2):428–430
Wu YL, Yi GJ, Peng XX (2010) Rapid screening of Musa species for resistance to Fusarium wilt in an in vitro bioassay. Eur J Plant Pathol 128(3):409–415
Wu YL, Huang BZ, Zhang ZS, Yang XY (2020) Modification of in vitro bioassay for screening Musa species against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 47(8):1577–1584. (in Chinese)
Zhang L, Yuan TL, Wang YZ, Zhang D, Bai TT, Xu ST, Wang YY, Tang WH, Zhang SJ (2018) Identification and evaluation of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 in Musa acuminata Pahang. Euphytica 214(7):106
Zuo CW, Deng GM, Li B, Huo HQ, Li CY, Hu CH, Kuang RB, Yang QS, Dong T, Sheng O, Yi GJ (2018) Germplasm screening of Musa spp. for resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 (Foc TR4). Eur J Plant Pathol 151(3):723–734
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
The opinions expressed in this chapter are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the [NameOfOrganization], its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the [NameOfOrganization], provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
Any dispute related to the use of the works of the [NameOfOrganization] that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the [NameOfOrganization]'s name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of the [NameOfOrganization]'s logo, shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the [NameOfOrganization] and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC-IGO license. Note that the link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wu, Y., Yi, G. (2022). Pre-Screening of Banana Genotypes for Fusarium Wilt Resistance by Using an In Vitro Bioassay. In: Jankowicz-Cieslak, J., Ingelbrecht, I.L. (eds) Efficient Screening Techniques to Identify Mutants with TR4 Resistance in Banana. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64915-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64915-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-64914-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-64915-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)