Abstract
This chapter, Western alternative development and Chinese development, presents two strategic planning proposals that are generated from frictions between rural development as construed by western aid agencies and forms of Chinese aid, especially regarding the speed of development and their cache of neoliberal ideologies. These programs dominated northern Laos in the 1990s and 2000s and have resulted in a patchwork landscape of development assistance and foreign investment. One featured strategic planning proposal references these earlier programs in Laos’s Muang Sing valley to help guide a strategy for basin-scale agricultural pollution remediation and increased water security, while the other proposal traces the legacies of opium’s replacement, primarily via Chinese investment, with rubber in northern Laos and the how the resultant patchwork of rubber, subsistence and cash crops, and ethnic diversity might deal with increasing rural–urban migration and significant associated strain on the rural agricultural labor force. These proposals exhibit the difficult balancing act between participating in the language and valuation metrics of development but with design concepts and approaches that actively resist easy constitution or reduction. The emphasis of alternative development on livelihood security, environmental sustainability and social development may be commendable, but the building of social capital takes time.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
1 Introduction
Drawing from discourse on the “sustainable development paradigm” and “frontier resourcification” examined in Chap. 4, this chapter presents two strategic planning proposals that are generated from frictions between rural development as construed by western aid agencies and forms of Chinese aid and development, especially regarding the speed of development and their cache of neoliberal ideologies. This is not about Chinese versus Western but recognizing the legacy and patchwork of development assistance, forces dominating northern Laos in the 1990s and 2000s, in these landscapes to guide intervention today.
The UN General Assembly (1998) defined alternative development as the prevention and elimination of narcotics through rural development “in the context of sustained national growth and sustainable development … recognizing the particular sociocultural characteristics of the target communities and groups.” Alternative development project components frequently include sustainable natural resource management, livelihood diversification (with a focus on food security and expanding market access), road and water infrastructure provision, health and education facilities and programs. These projects also hold some emancipatory ideals of the sustainable development paradigm, including capacity-building for village governance, explicitly targeting (and defining) vulnerable subpopulations, and recognizing opium cultivation as a symptom of poverty (rather than a cause) stemming from a reduction in land available for shifting cultivation (Cohen, 2009).
In Muang Sing, alternative development projects from the mid-1990s through 2010 were largely adapted from the German Technical Cooperation Agency (GTZ) and Norwegian Church Aid’s (NCA) successful highland development programs in northern Thailand from the 1980s and 1990s. However, when paired with the higher speeds of implementation deemed necessary for opium eradication and substantially less advanced infrastructure in Laos, these programs were far less successful. Although GTZ had highlighted the necessity of a “cautious promotion” of para rubber, promoting rubber agroforestry to reduce soil erosion and preserve some biodiversity, they also recommended monitoring by local government and master contracts to protect villages interests from foreign investors, on top of clear demarcation of village boundaries, land titling, and agricultural diversification (Cohen, 2009, p. 428). This long list of regulatory and land tenure-related issues underscores the substantial economic forces and weakness of Laos’s development context. Today these landscapes are dominated not only be rubber but cash crop expansion (Figs. 1 and 2), which has led to a cumulative reduction in available ground and surface water resources necessitating the construction of new irrigation and water supply infrastructure (Figs. 3 and 4).
The two strategic planning proposals included in this chapter are: Low-labor landscapes: An Agricultural response to short-term construction employment on the China-Laos Railway; and Water risk and responsibility: A Political-chemical land genealogy for the Muang Sing Valley, Laos. While these two proposals are not dealing with alternative development by its definition, the proposal “Water Risk and Sustainability” assembles the legacies of alternative development programs in the Muang Sing valley to help guide a strategy for basin-scale agricultural pollution remediation and increased water security. “Low-labor landscapes” traces the legacies of opium’s replacement, primarily via Chinese investment, with rubber in northern Laos and the how the resultant patchwork of rubber, subsistence and cash crops, and ethnic diversity might deal with increasing rural–urban migration and significant associated strain on the rural agricultural labor force. As geographer Barney (2009) surmised in his writing on northern Laos, which we reviewed in Chap. 4, such legacies and mosaics create a “patchwork” (p. 147) landscape or frontier of resource enclosures—“fragmented and overlapping mosaics” that result in migrations and new economies (p. 152). These two proposals proactively reconstruct this patchwork or mosaic as both narrative and site of strategy development and preliminary testing, i.e., scenario-building.
Cohen contrasts Western-style “alternative development” with Chinese “opium replacement” programs in northwestern Laos’s Muang Sing valley. These Chinese programs were effectively foreign investment, largely in rubber (Figs. 5 and 6), carrying different moral forces of “scientific rationality, technical competence and entrepreneurial spirit” characteristic of 1950s Western modernization theory (Cohen, 2009, p. 429) that were later rejected in the Alternative Technology Movement and post-development theory. Rubber had been promoted by provincial authorities to households in Yunnan since the mid-1980s. Large-scale rubber cultivation spread in northern Laos with the emergence of China as the world’s largest rubber market, declining domestic rubber yields, and China’s own restrictions on rubber cultivation across the border in Xishuangbanna due to environmental degradation from rubber monocultures, which resulted in reduced biodiversity, reduced food security, and large-scale hydrological and erosion impacts (Shi, 2008).
Farmers in northern Laos aspired for “Chinese modernity,” while the Akha ethnic group used familial and patronage connections with clans in Yunnan for capital, technical assistance, saplings and market access (Diana, 2007 as cited in Cohen, 2009). The proposal “Low labor landscapes” recognizes these cross-border clan connections, in addition to the specific spiritual and seasonal calendars of different ethnic groups in the study region. Cohen further describes how socioeconomic inequalities were aggravated and reproduced in household investment startups and access to productive land, in addition to Laos’s limited credit, weak regulation and poor enforcement mechanisms. Both strategic planning proposals in this chapter not only recognize diverse publics but actively construct them. In “Water risk and sustainability,” this construction is not only demographic but land-based, constructing a land genealogy from satellite imagery, with speculation on a diversity landholder socio-economic conditions and potentials of localized pollution accumulation in the landscape from herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers.
In his review of the World Bank and the emergence of the environmental state, Goldman emphasizes the creation of a hegemonic discourse of “authoritative green knowledge” rooted in neoliberal market ideologies—a knowledge regime of land valuation and classification that replaces cultural relations and ecological complexity with biodiversity conservation, sustainable forestry and watershed management development programs (Goldman, 2001, p. 194, 2005). The two proposals featured next exhibit the difficult balancing act between participating in the language and valuation metrics of development but with design concepts and approaches that actively resist easy constitution or reduction. The emphasis of alternative development on livelihood security, environmental sustainability and social development may be commendable, but the building of social capital takes time. Critical, landscape-oriented planning is necessary, especially as road and dam-building, resettlement programs, and large-scale agroindustry continue apace (Figs. 7 and 8).
2 Low-Labor Landscapes: An Agricultural Response to Short-Term Construction Employment on the China-Laos Railway
Landscapes surrounding the Boten Special Economic Zone (SEZ) on the Laos-China border are undergoing transformation. Immediately south of Boten SEZ, a “smart” logistics hub is proposed by Thailand-headquartered Amata corporation. Amata signed concessions in 2018 for lands totaling 7,000 hectares near Nateuy village (Radio Free Asia, 2019b) at the intersection of Route 13, Laos’s primary north–south highway, and Route 3, which is planned for upgrading into a four-lane highway to Thailand (Dwyer, 2020). While these developments have not removed large numbers of people from their lands, agricultural systems already unseated by two decades of large-scale rubber plantations and cash crops via Chinese contract farming need increased resiliency (Fig. 9). Dependency on the rubber market, which has weakened considerably in recent years, has led to shrinking subsistence rice production and food security problems (Baird, 2011). Construction jobs for the China-Laos railway, as well as illicit industries tied to Boten’s development, are changing agricultural labor availability.Footnote 1 While these new developments create short-term job opportunities for the surrounding local population, further labor diversification away from the agricultural sector will likely lead to permanent loss of cultivated land and the indigenous knowledge embedded in it (Fig. 10). This project speculates how labor diversification and an ensuing agricultural labor shortage, especially one with variable annual and seasonal labor availability, may affect communities along the China-Laos Railway.
Timelines are constructed showing how the four dominant major agricultural practices are affected by construction of the railway and future related industrial developments (Fig. 11). These agricultural systems, including paddy rice, upland rice, rubber plantations, and non-timber forest products (NTFP), react differently, both ecologically and temporally, to labor shortages, which are themselves annually and seasonally variable. For instance, while fallow periods in upload rice are a normal part of the agricultural cycle, recently neglected fallow paddy rice can lead to uncontrolled weed invasion. Unmanaged rubber plantations still produce yield, although a slightly diminished one. These limited impacts can be mitigated if lasting only a short duration. However, owing to industrial developments in and around the planned Nateuy logistics hub, a sustained labor deficit would require substantial labor to reestablishment agricultural production, likely beyond what villages can provide or sustain. Additionally, households would need to contend with Laos’s fallow land law, which stipulates that land can be resumed by the state if left fallow for more than 3 years (Lund, 2011).
This project develops scenarios and strategies for labor shortages, depopulation, decreasing subsistence, and cash crop market fluctuations together with demographics and traditional agricultural knowledge in villages surrounding Nateuy. Strategies are proposed to increase agricultural and livelihood resilience under changes in village labor availability, including suggesting crops that require less labor compared to existing produce and crops requiring preparation and harvesting but with minimal management (Figs. 12, 13 and 14). When expecting an agricultural labor deficit, high-return cardamom should be established in upland areas, as it requires one-third the labor of upland rice, takes 3 years to mature, and can be harvested will relatively low manpower. Excess labor can then focus on alternative low-labor crops such as maize. Maize fields can return to paddy rice as village labor becomes available and stabilizes. For those villages with high market-dependence from their rubber plantations but insufficient subsistence production, they may temporarily plant cash crops such as sugarcane in their paddy fields or leave these fields fallow with the intent to practice clean or organic farming in the future. For villages with high market-dependence and sufficient food production, they may adapt to a labor deficit by converting rice fields into alternative diversified cash crops such as orchards requiring three-years intensive preparation, followed by low maintenance with lasting yields for 20 years or longer and lower risk to market fluctuations than rubber.
These strategies are then modified based on cultural practices. The surrounding population consists predominantly of Hmong, Khmuic, and Mien ethnic groups (Fig. 15) (Epprecht et al., 2018). The Hmong maintain a strong clan system that enables high economic security and resource and knowledge access. This may facilitate greater market access and resilience in testing of new species or agricultural techniques. The Khmuic have strong traditional rituals tied to the agricultural calendars and ecological cycles of upland rice farming. The Mien tend a wide range of species in their home gardens, which range from food production to indigenous cultural and medicinal usage (Fig. 16). Recognizing that changes in agricultural practices at any scale are difficult to encourage, these agricultural strategies should be read as an approach to development; on-the-ground research is necessary to assess actual viability.
The design proposal “Low-labor landscapes: An Agricultural response to short-term construction employment on the China-Laos Railway” and accompanying illustrations were developed by Brian Cheang during the course Studio Laos: Strategic Landscape Planning for the Greater Mekong.
3 Water Risk and Responsibility: A Political-Chemical Land Genealogy for the Muang Sing Valley, Laos
An irrigation dam was recently constructed in northwestern Laos’s Nam Ha National Protected Area along Route 17, which connects Luang Namtha’s provincial capital with Muang Sing in the Golden Triangle region. During our field visit in March 2019, local civil society groups speculated that the dam was funded by a Vietnamese loan, which would be paid back through selling its water to cash crop producers in the Muang Sing valley that, given the proliferation of rubber and other cash crops since the early 2000s (Liu et al., 2016), has experienced a significant decrease in surface water flow and groundwater levels (Fig. 17). Due to its sedimentary composition, groundwater storage in the Muang Sing valley may be relatively low at 1,200 mm (Viossanges et al., 2018). Decades of cash crop expansion required more water, adding additional stress especially in the dry season. Many cash crop plantations are joint-ventures or operate under various forms of foreign-invested contract farming, predominantly with Chinese companies. Once paid off, this new supply of irrigation water has the prospect of becoming a public good to support small- and medium-scale rice farmers in the region, many of whom were resettled from the uploads during bans on shifting cultivation and opium eradication in the 1990s and 2000s (Fig. 18). Since resettlement, communities have experienced intensified water use, increased competition for land and resources, increase economic division, and decreased trust among landholders. Regardless of how much veracity that narrative holds, we consider it a useful trigger to think about environmental sustainability, water equity, and food security in the Muang Sing valley.
In January 2017, 2 years before our visit, a national ban on new banana plantations was issued in Laos due the pervasive ongoing chemical use and subsequent health impacts on workers and nearby communities (Radio Free Asia, 2019a). Years of using these chemicals, some illegal even under Laos’s relatively nascent environmental regulations, have left them accumulated in the soil and spread throughout the hydrological system. Heavy metals from fertilizers resist degradation and are persistent in the soil. Panama disease can survive up to 30 years in the soil (Stover, 1990). Production of the commercially viable Cavendish banana, accounting for around half of the global market, often requires high inputs of fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides (Goh & Marshall, 2017).
Soon after the ban was implemented, the fungal epidemic Panama disease began spreading in February 2017 through Cavendish banana plantations in Luang Namtha Province (Chittarath et al., 2018). Our visit to an experimental banana plantation, owned by a Lao landholder but contracted out to a Chinese company testing the viability of commercially alternative species, sets the context for this strategic proposal—Water risk and responsibility: A political-chemical land genealogy for the Muang Sing Valley, Laos—that organizes a series of remediation strategies to improve water quality and quantity, mainly due to high inputs of herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers, and promote water equity in access, distribution and management.
Without detailed surveys of the valley’s hydrological regime, we speculated on the local hydrology using free globally available elevation models and satellite imagery to model natural rivers, streams, and non-perennial washes and artificial irrigation canals (Fig. 19) and the proximate effects of a series of typical plantations within the valley as sources of nonpoint-source pollution (Figs. 20 and 21). Similarly, without a household or landowner survey, we assumed a range of possible ownership configurations (e.g., large- and smallholders, independent vs. contract farming) and land genealogies (i.e., crop history and pollution accumulation) based on land patterns deduced from remotely sensed imagery (Fig. 22). These yielded an array of potential producer-production typologies that were further categorized considering biophysical aspects, stakeholders’ capabilities and their capacity for risk tolerance and management. The Asian Development Bank’s (ADB, 2019) projects for establishing community watershed management in north-central Laos were used as reference. Water users’ risks are described in 13 categories across economic, political, natural, agricultural and social considerations drawn from ADB’s irrigation subsector guidance notes and criteria from the Lao Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry guidelines (Fig. 23; ADB, 2017; UNDP Lao PDR, 2012).
Four common producer-production typologies were selected to develop our strategic planning proposal, taking into account stakeholder risks and capabilities and considering their spatial proximity to other plantations, costs, capacities, and social choice (Figs. 24, 25 and 26). Proposed remediation techniques included physical, chemical and biological applications to be deployed in-situ to ensure land remains at least partly productive during implementation. These four typologies are:
Typology A: Where the plantation is foreign investment in rubber, the emphasis is on preventing chemical run-off and mitigating high water consumption. Such foreign investors generally have higher risk tolerance, more financial resources, and a larger capacity for change. They require the least technical assistance yet likely greater regulation and incentive. We propose that an independently monitored management plan should be required for agricultural pollution mitigation and remediation. Technologically, this could involve installing permeable reactive subsurface barriers between plantations and water courses to stop contaminant plumes (Typology A components of Figs. 27, 28, 29 and 30).
Typology B: Smallholders who independently grow bananas have the lowest risk tolerance and least capability for change, requiring the most technical assistance in both financial terms and technology transfer. Crop diversification, including fast-growing beans and cassava, is promoted to make livelihoods more resilient to uncertainties. These households may provide labor in return for communal irrigation water access rights. Technologically, soil chemical immobilization is recommended to limit contamination in the short term (Typology B components of Figs. 27, 28, 29 and 30).
Typology C: Smallholders alternating wet rice cultivation with contract farming have both low risk tolerance and low resilience to change. Poor irrigation water quality, nutrient loss from their paddy production systems, and contamination from contract farming have resulted in lower rice yields year-on-year. We recommend that foreign investment provide access to technologies, such as fertilizers, while smallholders provide the manpower for operation and maintenance of the remediation strategy. Between harvesting and planting cycles, chelate- and microbe-assisted phytoremediation, which translocate metals from the roots to the foliage, are effective for efficient remediation of low- to moderately contaminated soils. Wide adoption of these strategies across the valley can lead to overall increased soil productivity and reduce nonpoint source pollution (Typology C components of Figs. 27, 28, 29 and 30).
Typology D: Large-holder banana plantations implemented through contract farming have high risk tolerance and larger capabilities. High concentrations of pollutants in these contaminated soils require longer, more intensive remediation. Chemical oxidation offers efficiency although this makes the first stage of implementation costly. Such remediation should be mandated, otherwise incentives are needed to encourage alterative cash crops and diversification, with domestic market access prioritized. Technologically, these large-holders should install permeable reactive subsurface barriers between plantations and water courses to stop contaminant plumes (Typology D components of Figs. 27, 28, 29 and 30).
Remediation is both a costly and complex process to optimize across the Muang Sing valley. While this proposal makes several assumptions about the agro-economics of land and water use, it does so to draw attention to the great diversity of economic situations and site-specific risks to agricultural pollution and disease. Landholder and investor participation will likely require incentives. While foreign investors are likely least willing to participate, more independent smallholders would likely need both subsidies and technical knowledge transfer by local experts. Those engaged in contract farming may be less inclined to act given the slow but steady accumulation of contaminants in the soil. This proposal offers a detailed framework for coordinating and mitigating these complexities and for the establish sustainable long-term cooperation of diverse interests.
The design proposal “Water risk and responsibility: A political-chemical land genealogy for the Muang Sing Valley, Laos” and accompanying illustrations were developed by Vanessa Wong Nok Yiu and Sally Song Ziqi during the course Studio Laos: Strategic Landscape Planning for the Greater Mekong.
Notes
- 1.
Authors’ discussion with village leaders in Luang Namtha in March 2019.
References
ADB (Asian Development Bank). (2017). Irrigation subsector guidance note: Building blocks for sustainable investment. Asian Development Bank.
ADB (Asian Development Bank). (2019). Lao PDR: Sustainable rural infrastructure and watershed management sector project. Asian Development Bank.
Baird, I. G. (2011). Turning land into capital, turning people into labour: Primitive accumulation and the arrival of large-scale economic land concessions in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. New Proposals: Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry,5(1), 10–26.
Barney, K. (2009). Laos and the making of a ‘relational’ resource frontier. Geographical Journal,175(2), 146–159.
Chittarath, K., Mostert, D., Crew, K. S., Viljoen, A., Kong, G., Molina, A. B., & Thomas, J. E. (2018). First report of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Tropical Race 4 (VCG 01213/16) associated with Cavendish bananas in Laos. Plant Disease, 102(2), 449.
Cohen, P. T. (2009). The post-opium scenario and rubber in northern Laos: Alternative Western and Chinese models of development. International Journal of Drug Policy,20(5), 424–430.
Diana, A. (2007). “The Chinese Know the Way”: Rubber and modernity along the China-Laos border. Paper presented at International Conference on Critical Transitions in the Mekong Region, 29–31 January, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Dwyer, M. B. (2020). “They will not automatically benefit”: The politics of infrastructure development in Laos’s Northern Economic Corridor. Political Geography, 78, 102118.
Epprecht, M., Bosoni, N., Ehrensperger, A., Nagasawa, H., Lu, J., Studer, D., Vollmar, P., & Sisoulath, V. (2018). Socio-economic atlas of the Lao PDR: Patterns and trends from 2005 to 2015. Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern, and Lao Statistics Bureau, Lao PDR, with Bern Open Publishing.
Goh, B., & Marshall, A. R. C. (2017, May 12). Cash and chemicals: For Laos, Chinese banana boom a blessing and curse. Reuters.
Goldman, M. (2001). Constructing an environmental state: Eco-governmentality and other transnational practices of a ‘green’ World Bank. Social Problems,48(4), 499–523.
Goldman, M. (2005). Imperial nature: The World Bank and struggles for social justice in the age of globalization. Yale University Press.
Liu, X., Jiang, L., Feng, Z., & Li, P. (2016). Rubber plantation expansion related land use change along the Laos-China border region. Sustainability,8(10), 1011.
Lund, C. (2011). Fragmented sovereignty: Land reform and dispossession in Laos. The Journal of Peasant Studies,38(4), 885–905.
Radio Free Asia. (2019a, May 14). Lao government vows to enforce ban on concessions for new banana plantations. Radio Free Asia.
Radio Free Asia. (2019b, October 1). Villagers in Laos resist 50-year land concession to Thai developer. Radio Free Asia.
Shi, W. (2008). Rubber boom in Luang Namtha: A transnational perspective. Vientiane, Laos: German Technical Cooperation (GTZ) Rural Development in Mountainous Areas of Northern Lao PDR (RDMA).
Stover, R. H. (1990). Fusarium wilt of banana: Some history and current status of the disease. In R. C. Ploetz (Ed.), Fusarium wilt of banana (pp. 1–7). American Phytopathological Society Press.
UN General Assembly. (1998). Action plan on international cooperation on the eradication of illicit drug crops and on alternative development (resolution S-20/4 E). United Nations.
UNDP Lao PDR. (2012). Guidelines for farmer organizations/cooperatives for preparation of climate change adaptation action plans. Vientiane, Lao PDR: UNDP Lao PDR.
Viossanges, M., Pavelic, P., Rebelo, L.-M., Lacombe, G., & Sotoukee, T. (2018). Regional mapping of groundwater resources in data-scarce regions: The case of Laos. Hydrology,5(1), 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kelly, A.S., Lu, X. (2021). Western Alternative Development and Chinese Development. In: Critical Landscape Planning during the Belt and Road Initiative. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4067-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4067-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4066-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4067-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)