Abstract
In this chapter, we propose an anisotropic monolayer scheme to prevent thermal sensors from distorting local and background temperature profiles, making them accurate and thermally invisible. We design metashells with anisotropic thermal conductivity and perform finite-element simulations in two or three dimensions for arbitrarily given thermal conductivity of sensors and backgrounds. We further experimentally fabricate a metashell with an anisotropic thermal conductivity based on the effective medium theory, which confirms the feasibility of our scheme. Our results are beneficial to improving the performance of thermal detection and may also guide other diffusive physical fields.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Keywords
1 Opening Remarks
Temperature measurement has broad applications, requiring high sensitivity for thermal sensors. However, the distortion of temperature profiles resulting from thermal sensors cannot be avoided by only improving sensitivity. A severe problem lies in the thermal-conductivity mismatch between sensors and backgrounds. Similar problem (parametric mismatch) also occurs in some other fields, and promotes relevant researches in electromagnetismĀ [1, 2], magneticsĀ [3], and acousticsĀ [4,5,6].
Many schemes were proposed based on neutral inclusionĀ [7] or transformation thermoticsĀ [8]. Furthermore, a multiphysical scheme was proposed by coating a sensor with an isotropic shellĀ [9]. Though these schemes improve the performance of thermal detection, they are also faced with problems of complex parameters and technological difficulty. For the scheme based on transformation thermoticsĀ [8], anisotropic, inhomogeneous, and even negative thermal conductivity is required, which makes its experimental realization extremely difficult. For the scheme based on an isotropic shellĀ [7, 9,10,11], local temperature profiles are still different from the original ones, making thermal detection inaccurate. Here, ālocalā indicates the region occupied by a sensor. To improve accuracy, one should minimize the thickness of the isotropic shell, which, however, still cannot completely remove inaccuracy. In this sense, to date, thermal sensors with both accuracy and invisibility are still experimentally lacking. Here, accuracy and invisibility respectively indicate that local and background temperature profiles are not distorted.
Different from existing methodsĀ [7,8,9,10,11], we propose an anisotropic monolayer scheme that can accurately measure local temperature profiles without disturbing background thermal fields. It is worth noting that a similar scheme has been successfully applied to design other thermal functions, such as cloakingĀ [12,13,14], concentratingĀ [13,14,15], and chameleonĀ [16, 17]. The present scheme is applicable for arbitrarily given thermal conductivities of backgrounds and sensors, which is confirmed by finite-element simulations in two or three dimensions. Furthermore, we experimentally fabricate a metashell with anisotropic thermal conductivity based on the effective medium theoryĀ [18,19,20,21,22], and the experimental results agree well with the theory and finite-element simulations.
2 Theoretical Foundation
We start by discussing a two-dimensional system shown in Fig.Ā 11.1. The system is divided by a metashell (Area II) into three areas, whose thermal conductivities are \(\kappa _1\) for sensor (Area I), \(\boldsymbol{\kappa }_2=\textrm{diag}\left( \kappa _{rr},\,\kappa _{\theta \theta }\right) \) for metashell (Area II), and \(\kappa _3\) for background (Area III). \(\boldsymbol{\kappa }_2\) is expressed in cylindrical coordinates \(\left( r,\,\theta \right) \), where \(\kappa _{rr}\) and \(\kappa _{\theta \theta }\) are radial and tangential thermal conductivities, respectively. We consider the known equation describing passive heat conduction at steady states,
where \(\boldsymbol{\kappa }\) and T are thermal conductivity and temperature, respectively.
EquationĀ (11.1) can be expanded in cylindrical coordinates as
The general solution to Eq.Ā (11.2) is
where \(m_{1}=\sqrt{\kappa _{\theta \theta }/\kappa _{rr}}\) and \(m_{2}=-\sqrt{\kappa _{\theta \theta }/\kappa _{rr}}\), representing anisotropy degree.
The temperature profiles of sensor (Area I), metashell (Area II), and background (Area III) are respectively denoted as \(T_1\), \(T_2\), and \(T_3\), which satisfy the general solution in Eq.Ā (11.3). Especially, \(T_1\) and \(T_3\) can be given by the right side of Eq.Ā (11.3) with \(m_{1}=1\) and \(m_{2}=-1\). Boundary conditions are determined by the continuities of temperature and normal heat flux,
Considering the symmetry of boundary conditions, we only keep certain terms in Eq.Ā (11.3) as the temperature profiles of three areas,
where the temperature at \(\theta =\pm \pi /2\) is defined as \(A_0\), and \(D=|\boldsymbol{\nabla }T_0|\) is the modulus of an external linear thermal field \(\boldsymbol{\nabla }T_0\).
We have six undetermined coefficients (i.e., A, B, C, E, \(\kappa _{rr}\), and \(\kappa _{\theta \theta }\)) and only four equations (Eq.Ā (11.4)). The other two equations are to make thermal sensors accurate and thermally invisible,
where \(A=D\) indicates that the local temperature profile is the same as the background temperature profile, making a thermal sensor accurate; and \(E=0\) indicates that the background temperature profile is undistorted, making a thermal sensor invisible.
Then, the six unknown coefficients can be uniquely determined by six equations (Eqs.Ā (11.4) and (11.6)), including the anisotropic thermal conductivity of the metashell \(\boldsymbol{\kappa }_2=\textrm{diag}\left( \kappa _{rr},\,\kappa _{\theta \theta }\right) \). Therefore, thermal sensors with accuracy and thermal invisibility in two dimensions are designed.
On the same footing, we extend the two-dimensional theory to three dimensions. Accordingly, the thermal conductivity of the metashell is denoted as \(\boldsymbol{\kappa }_2=\textrm{diag}\left( \kappa _{rr},\,\kappa _{\theta \theta },\,\kappa _{\varphi \varphi }\right) \) with \(\kappa _{\theta \theta }=\kappa _{\varphi \varphi }\). Then, Eq.Ā (11.1) can be expanded in spherical coordinates \(\left( r,\,\theta ,\,\varphi \right) \) as
where \(\varphi \) is neglected because we consider a rotational symmetric case.
The general solution to Eq.Ā (11.7) is
where \(s_{1}=\left[ -1+\sqrt{1+4i\left( i+1\right) \kappa _{\theta \theta }/\kappa _{rr}}\right] /2\), \(s_{2}=\left[ -1-\sqrt{1+4i\left( i+1\right) \kappa _{\theta \theta }/\kappa _{rr}}\right] /2\), i is summation index, and \(P_i\) is the Legendre polynomials. Since three-dimensional boundary conditions are the same as two-dimensional ones, the temperature profiles for three areas can be expressed as
where \(s_{1}=\left[ -1+\sqrt{1+8\kappa _{\theta \theta }/\kappa _{rr}}\right] /2\), \(s_{2}=\left[ -1-\sqrt{1+8\kappa _{\theta \theta }/\kappa _{rr}}\right] /2\), and the six unknown coefficients (i.e., A, B, C, E, \(\kappa _{rr}\), and \(\kappa _{\theta \theta }\)) can also be solved by Eqs.Ā (11.4)Ā andĀ (11.6). Therefore, we also make three-dimensional thermal sensors accurate and invisible. We use Mathematica to solve the six equations (Eqs.Ā (11.4)Ā andĀ (11.6)) and obtain the required thermal conductivity of the metashell.
3 Finite-Element Simulation
To confirm our theory, we further perform finite-element simulations with COMSOL Multiphysics. We can derive the anisotropic thermal conductivity of metashells and perform finite-element simulations for arbitrarily given thermal conductivity of backgrounds and sensors.
For comparison, we show a reference with uniform thermal conductivity in Fig.Ā 11.2a. The finite-element simulations with a reference shell (a bare sensor embedded in the background, i.e., bareness), an isotropic shell (calculated with the theory in Ref.Ā [9]), and an anisotropic metashell (calculated by our theory) are presented in Fig.Ā 11.2bād, respectively. FigureĀ 11.2b indicates that a bare thermal sensor indeed distorts local (Area I) and background (Area III) temperature profiles. Comparing Fig.Ā 11.2a and c, although the isotropic shell keeps the background temperature profile undistorted, the local temperature profile is still changed. Fortunately, our scheme (Fig.Ā 11.2d) makes local and background temperature profiles the same as those in Fig.Ā 11.2a, thus making the sensor accurate and thermally invisible.
To compare different schemes quantitatively, we also plot temperature-difference profiles with the temperature in Fig.Ā 11.2c minus that in Fig.Ā 11.2a (Fig.Ā 11.3a) and the temperature in Fig.Ā 11.2d minus that in Fig.Ā 11.2a (Fig.Ā 11.3b). The temperature difference in the local region of Fig.Ā 11.3a is nonzero, indicating that the detected temperature is not the original one. The temperature difference in the local region of Fig.Ā 11.3b is zero, making a thermal sensor accurate. Certainly, the temperature profile of the metashell has a small difference. We export the temperature-gradient distributions along x axis on Line 1 in Fig.Ā 11.2, as shown in Fig.Ā 11.3c. The results indicate that the isotropic and anisotropic shells (Fig.Ā 11.2c and d) show the same advantage of thermal invisibility (i.e., the constant temperature-gradient distribution as that in reference). However, due to the thermal-conductivity mismatch between the sensor and background, a bare sensor distorts the heat flow of the original background thermal field, so the temperature gradient at the position of Line 1 in Fig.Ā 11.2b is not a constant. We also export the temperature distributions on Line 2 in Fig.Ā 11.2, as shown in Fig.Ā 11.3d. The results show that the anisotropic scheme is better than the isotropic one because what the thermal sensor in Fig.Ā 11.2d detects is completely consistent with the reference. However, the detection in Fig.Ā 11.2c deviates from the reference.
Moreover, we also discuss the case that the thermal conductivity of the sensor (Area I) is larger than that of the background (Area III) to ensure completeness; see Figs.Ā 11.4 and 11.5. The results are similar to Figs.Ā 11.2 and 11.3. That is, a bare thermal sensor will distort temperature profiles of all areas (Fig.Ā 11.4b). The existing isotropic scheme can keep the background temperature profile undistorted, but the local one is changed (Fig.Ā 11.4c). The present scheme can ensure both local and background temperature profiles undistorted (Fig.Ā 11.4d). Factual data can be found in Fig.Ā 11.5.
To go further, we also perform three-dimensional finite-element simulations. The temperature profiles in the sensor (Area I) in Fig.Ā 11.6b and c are different from that in Fig.Ā 11.6a, which means that the sensor cannot accurately measure local temperature distributions. Fortunately, the temperature profiles in the sensor (Area I) and background (Area III) in Fig.Ā 11.6d are identical to those in Fig.Ā 11.6a. We also perform quantitative analyses on āaccurateā and āinvisibleā properties of the sensor (Fig.Ā 11.6eāh), and the results are what we expect, just like the two-dimensional case. To sum up, the accuracy and invisibility of three-dimensional thermal sensors are also confirmed by simulations.
4 Laboratory Experiment
To experimentally validate the finite-element simulations in Fig.Ā 11.2b and d, we set up a device shown in Fig.Ā 11.7a. By utilizing laser cutting, we fabricate two samples (Fig.Ā 11.7b and c) based on ellipse-embedded structuresĀ [18]. The holes in Areas I and III are uniformly distributed with circular shapes, ensuring that the effective thermal conductivity is isotropic. The holes in Area II have anisotropic (elliptical) geometry, so the effective thermal conductivity is also anisotropic. Therefore, the perforated structure indeed follows the theory. To eliminate infrared reflection and thermal convection as much as possible, we also apply transparent and foamed plastic films (insulating materials) on the upper and lower surfaces of the two samples, respectively. Then, we measure the temperature profiles of these two samples with the infrared camera Flir E60. The measured results with a reference shell and with an anisotropic metashell are shown in Fig.Ā 11.7d and e, respectively. We also perform finite-element simulations based on these two samples, as shown in Fig.Ā 11.7f and g. Both finite-element simulations (Fig.Ā 11.2b and d, and Fig.Ā 11.7f and g) and experiments (Fig.Ā 11.7d and e) prove that with the present scheme, a thermal sensor does accurately detect the local temperature profile without disturbing the background thermal field.
We have discussed the scheme in steady heat conduction, and extending it to transient states is promising, which should consider density and heat capacity. Furthermore, topology optimization is also a powerful method to design metamaterialsĀ [24,25,26,27] beyond transformation methodĀ [28,29,30,31], which could be applied to design accurate and invisible sensors.
5 Conclusion
We have proposed an anisotropic monolayer scheme to make thermal sensors accurate and thermally invisible. By coating a thermal sensor with a metashell with anisotropic thermal conductivity, the thermal sensor can accurately measure local temperature profiles without disturbing surrounding thermal fields. The present scheme is validated by two-dimensional simulations and experiments, which also apply to three dimensions. These results may advance the performance of thermal detection and provide guidance to thermal camouflageĀ [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. On the same basis, this work also offers hints to obtaining counterparts in other diffusive fields.
6 Exercise andĀ Solution
Exercise
1. Solve the unknown numbers in Eqs.Ā (11.5) and (11.9).
Solution
1. Since \(\kappa _{rr}\) and \(\kappa _{\theta \theta }\) appear in the exponent, it is difficult to analytically express them. To solve the problem, we treat \(\kappa _1\) and \(\kappa _3\) as two undetermined coefficients, which together with other coefficients can be respectively expressed in two and three dimensions as
EquationsĀ (11.10) and (11.11) have similar forms with only different \(m_{1,\,2}\) and \(s_{1,\,2}\).
References
AlĆ¹, A., Engheta, N.: Cloaking a sensor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 233901 (2009)
Greenleaf, A., Kurylev, Y., Lassas, M., Uhlmann, G.: Cloaking a sensor via transformation optics. Phys. Rev. E 83, 016603 (2011)
Mach-Batlle, R., Navau, C., Sanchez, A.: Invisible magnetic sensors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 162406 (2018)
Zhu, X.F., Liang, B., Kan, W.W., Zou, X.Y., Cheng, J.C.: Acoustic cloaking by a superlens with single-negative materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 014301 (2011)
Fleury, R., Soric, J., AlĆ¹, A.: Physical bounds on absorption and scattering for cloaked sensors. Phys. Rev. B 89, 045122 (2014)
Fleury, R., Sounas, D., AlĆ¹, A.: An invisible acoustic sensor based on parity-time symmetry. Nat. Commun. 6, 5905 (2015)
He, X., Wu, L.Z.: Thermal transparency with the concept of neutral inclusion. Phys. Rev. E 88, 033201 (2013)
Shen, X.Y., Huang, J.P.: Thermally hiding an object inside a cloak with feeling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 78, 1 (2014)
Yang, T.Z., Bai, X., Gao, D.L., Wu, L.Z., Li, B.W., Thong, J.T.L., Qiu, C.-W.: Invisible sensors: simultaneous sensing and camouflaging in multiphysical fields. Adv. Mater. 27, 7752 (2015)
Yang, T.Z., Su, Y.S., Xu, W.K., Yang, X.D.: Transient thermal camouflage and heat signature control. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 121905 (2016)
Han, T.C., Yang, P., Li, Y., Lei, D.Y., Li, B.W., Hippalgaonkar, K., Qiu, C.-W.: Full-parameter omnidirectional thermal metadevices of anisotropic geometry. Adv. Mater. 30, 1804019 (2018)
Han, T.C., Yuan, T., Li, B.W., Qiu, C.-W.: Homogeneous thermal cloak with constant conductivity and tunable heat localization. Sci. Rep. 3, 1593 (2013)
Chen, T.Y., Weng, C.N., Tsai, Y.L.: Materials with constant anisotropic conductivity as a thermal cloak or concentrator. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 054904 (2015)
Hu, R., Huang, S.Y., Wang, M., Zhou, L.L., Peng, X.Y., Luo, X.B.: Binary thermal encoding by energy shielding and harvesting units. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 054032 (2018)
Han, T.C., Zhao, J.J., Yuan, T., Lei, D.Y., Li, B.W., Qiu, C.-W.: Theoretical realization of an ultra-efficient thermal-energy harvesting cell made of natural materials. Energ. Environ. Sci. 6, 3537 (2013)
Xu, L.J., Yang, S., Huang, J.P.: Passive metashells with adaptive thermal conductivities: chameleonlike behavior and its origin. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 054071 (2019)
Xu, L.J., Huang, J.P.: Chameleonlike metashells in microfluidics: a passive approach to adaptive responses. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 63, 228711 (2020)
Yang, S., Xu, L.J., Wang, R.Z., Huang, J.P.: Full control of heat transfer in single-particle structural materials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 121908 (2017)
Shang, J., Wang, R.Z., Xin, C., Dai, G.L., Huang, J.P.: Macroscopic networks of thermal conduction: failure tolerance and switching processes. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 121, 321 (2018)
Xu, L.J., Yang, S., Huang, J.P.: Thermal transparency induced by periodic interparticle interaction. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 034056 (2019)
Li, J.X., Li, Y., Li, T.L., Wang, W.Y., Li, L.Q., Qiu, C.-W.: Doublet thermal metadevice. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 044021 (2019)
Dai, G.L., Huang, J.P.: Nonlinear thermal conductivity of periodic composites. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 147, 118917 (2020)
Jin, P., Xu, L.J., Jiang, T., Zhang, L., Huang, J.P.: Making thermal sensors accurate and invisible with an anisotropic monolayer scheme. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 163, 120437 (2020)
Fujii, G., Akimoto, Y., Takahashi, M.: Exploring optimal topology of thermal cloaks by CMA-ES. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 061108 (2018)
Fujii, G., Akimoto, Y.: Optimizing the structural topology of bifunctional invisible cloak manipulating heat flux and direct current. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 174101 (2019)
Fujii, G., Akimoto, Y.: Topology-optimized thermal carpet cloak expressed by an immersed-boundary level-set method via a covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 137, 1312 (2019)
Fujii, G., Akimoto, Y.: Cloaking a concentrator in thermal conduction via topology optimization. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 159, 120082 (2020)
Fan, C.Z., Gao, Y., Huang, J.P.: Shaped graded materials with an apparent negative thermal conductivity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 251907 (2008)
Chen, T.Y., Weng, C.N., Chen, J.S.: Cloak for curvilinearly anisotropic media in conduction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 114103 (2008)
Xu, L.J., Dai, G.L., Huang, J.P.: Transformation multithermotics: Controlling radiation and conduction simultaneously. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 024063 (2020)
Xu, L.J., Yang, S., Dai, G.L., Huang, J.P.: Transformation omnithermotics: simultaneous manipulation of three basic modes of heat transfer. ES Energy Environ. 7, 65 (2020)
Li, Y., Bai, X., Yang, T.Z., Luo, H., Qiu, C.-W.: Structured thermal surface for radiative camouflage. Nat. Commun. 9, 273 (2018)
Hu, R., Zhou, S.L., Li, Y., Lei, D.Y., Luo, X.B., Qiu, C.-W.: Illusion thermotics. Adv. Mater. 30, 1707237 (2018)
Zhou, S.L., Hu, R., Luo, X.B.: Thermal illusion with twinborn-like heat signatures. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 127, 607 (2018)
Guo, J., Qu, Z.G.: Thermal cloak with adaptive heat source to proactively manipulate temperature field in heat conduction process. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 127, 1212 (2018)
Hu, R., Huang, S.Y., Wang, M., Luo, X.L., Shiomi, J., Qiu, C.-W.: Encrypted thermal printing with regionalization transformation. Adv. Mater. 31, 1807849 (2019)
Qin, J., Luo, W., Yang, P., Wang, B., Deng, T., Han, T.C.: Experimental demonstration of irregular thermal carpet cloaks with natural bulk material. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 141, 487 (2019)
Xu, L.J., Yang, S., Huang, J.P.: Dipole-assisted thermotics: experimental demonstration of dipole-driven thermal invisibility. Phys. Rev. E 100, 062108 (2019)
Peng, X.Y., Hu, R.: Three-dimensional illusion thermotics with separated thermal illusions. ES Energy Environ. 6, 39 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
Ā© 2023 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Xu, LJ., Huang, JP. (2023). Theory forĀ Invisible Thermal Sensors: Monolayer Scheme. In: Transformation Thermotics and Extended Theories. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5908-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5908-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-5907-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-5908-0
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)