Abstract
FBC technology with the advantages of flexible fuel applicability, stable temperature control, inherently low gas-pollutant emissions, etc. is an advanced fuel-conversion technology, applied in industry, and in heat and electric utilities. Theoretically, FBC has good gas-solid mixing and a resulting uniform temperature distribution. In the actual FBC operation, however, especially in large-scale reactors, the mixing of oxygen and fuel is still limited by the lateral solids dispersion coefficient and gas penetration. Such an issue not only reduces the combustion efficiency but also brings a series of problems related to the operation, such as excessive emissions and bed agglomeration. OCAC technology, which is using oxygen carrier particles to partially or completely replace the traditional inert bed materials in fluidized-bed reactors. This technology is aiming to improve combustion efficiency, enhance operational safety, and reduce pollutant emission by promoting the uniformity of the oxygen and temperature distributions in a fluidized-bed reactor. Benefiting from the oxygen buffering characteristic of oxygen carrier particles, OCAC can significantly improve the oxygen distribution throughout the combustion chamber, which can reduce CO and hydrocarbon emissions.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
1.1 General Background
In gas–solid fluidization theory, solid particles become fluidized when an ascending gas imposes a high enough drag force to overcome the downward force of gravity. Fluidized bed reactor (FBR) is an apparatus developed based on the fluidization theory, which has been applied to many kinds of multiphase chemical reactions for energy conversion, chemical, petroleum, metallurgy, and nuclear industries [1, 2]. Fluidized bed reactors have been operated commercially since the 1920s, with the advent of the Winkler coal gasifier in Germany [3]. The first attempt to burn solid fuels in a fluidized bed combustor (FBC) was made in the Soviet Union in the 1950s to develop boilers for industry and district heating. After that, the FBC technology experienced extensive development again from the 1970s [4,5,6].
During a typical process in FBC, fuel and desulfurization adsorbents, typically limestone, are injected into the lower part of the combustor to be quickly dispersed with the high-temperature bed material fluidized by the combustion gases. Fluidization gas, usually air, is blown into the bed through the air distributor from the wind box at the bottom of the furnace [5]. The fuel is immediately heated due to the high heat transfer coefficient, followed by drying, ignition, volatiles combustion, and char combustion. The limestone is decomposed and absorbs the SO2 generated from fuel combustion. With the increase of the fluidizing gas velocity, a bed will experience different fluidization states: fixed bed, bubbling fluidized bed, turbulent fluidized bed, fast bed, and pneumatic conveying.
Generally, large-scale FB reactors employ circulating fluidized bed (CFB) to achieve a satisfactory combustion performance, sulphur removal, and operation reliability [6]. In a CFB combustor, the bottom of the furnace is usually a bubbling or turbulent fluidized bed, while the upper part is normally a fast bed or pneumatic conveying. The small particles (bed material, char, fine ash, and desulfurization absorbent) can be carried out of the furnace by gas flow. They are then captured by a cyclone separator and recirculated to the furnace. This ensures higher combustion and desulfurization efficiencies. The CFB combustion technology shows many advantages: flexible fuel applicability, stable temperature control, flexible load control, low NOx formation, efficient desulfurization in the boiler, high combustion efficiency, and so on [4, 7,8,9,10,11,12].
Over the last several decades, fluidized combustion has attracted widespread attention, and a large number of investigations have been done, including hydrodynamic and mixing characteristics [5, 13,14,15,16,17], combustion behavior [18,19,20,21,22,23,24], heat and mass transfer enhancement [25,26,27,28,29,30,31], pollutant emission controls [5, 32,33,34,35,36,37], scale-up [6, 11, 12, 38, 39], and so on. It has been used successfully to burn a variety of solid fuels, including high-sulfur petroleum coke, different ranks of coal, and solid wastes [40,41,42,43]. In recent years, integrating CFB technology with oxy-fuel combustion (including pressurized oxy-fuel combustion) [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56] or chemical looping combustion (CLC) [57,58,59,60,61,62] for carbon capture has become highlighted research topics due to the demand for tackling global warming.
Gas–solid mixing is always an important topic in fluidized bed combustors since it determines heat and mass transfer, combustion behavior, combustion efficiency, and pollutant emissions [11, 24, 63]. The mass transfer in a fluidized bed combustor is a complicated phenomenon. After many years of development, it is generally accepted that oxygen in the bubble phase must pass through inert bed material to reach the fuel surface in the emulsion phase [64], which is different from the direct contact between fuel and oxygen in pulverized coal combustor (Fig. 1.1). The dense phase of the fluidized bed reactor presents an anoxic atmosphere on the whole, thus the char combustion in the dense bed is mainly controlled by oxygen diffusion. In the upper part of the reactor, namely in the transport zone, a core annular structure with a dilute phase surrounding the fuel particle is usually proposed, and the air supply, e.g., the secondary air, needs to reach the fuel in the center of the furnace. Generally, increasing bed voidage and disturbances can enhance the mass transfer, provided that the gas and fuel are evenly distributed in the bed [65, 66].
It should be noted that there are still some problems related to poor mixing, especially in large-scale CFB combustors. In a typical CFB process, the fuel is fed from the wall of the furnace, while the primary air is injected over the cross-section through the distributor [5]. The dispersion of fuel in the bed as well as the uniformity of the air supply determines the fluidization conditions and the distribution of heat release in the bed. According to the experiment and simulation studies on both lab- and industrial-scale CFB combustors, it is found that the effective lateral fuel dispersion coefficient (Dsr) increases gradually with the increase of the boiler size until reaching a stable value [11, 63, 67,68,69,70]. The value of Dsr for fuel particles in industrial CFB boilers is of the order of 0.1Â m2/s, which is affected by the fluidization velocity, the static bed height, the bed particle size, etc. [11, 63]. The fuel is usually introduced from the furnace wall in on or several feed points, sometimes air assisted. The fuel has to travel over the furnace cross section, a distance depending on boiler size. Therefore, the fuel distribution in the fluidized-bed combustor becomes more uneven when the boiler capacity is further increased to electric utility size. In addition to the lateral dispersion, light fuels, such as biomass and solid wastes, tend to be subject to more segregation and bad mixing of fuel and oxygen because of the rapid release of volatiles [71,72,73,74,75,76].
Poor gas–solid mixing may bring many operational problems, such as local defluidization, uneven temperature distribution, agglomeration, low burnout rate, large excess air ratio, high pollutant emission, and so on [5]. Such issues not only reduce the efficiency of the boiler but also cause safety and environmental problems. Even though technical measures have been introduced to improve the spatial mixing characteristics of boilers, such as optimizing the size distribution of fuel particles, increasing the number of fuel feed points, improving the air distributor performance to ensure even primary air supply, increasing secondary air momentum, etc. Here is still room for improvements.
In 2013, Thunman et al. [77] from Chalmers University of Technology proposed the innovative technology concept of oxygen-carrier-aided combustion (OCAC), which aims of improving the distribution of oxygen throughout the combustion chamber. In this concept, the conventional inert bed inventory (usually silica sand and ash) is partially or completely replaced by reactive particles, like metal oxides. Such so-called oxygen carriers can react with fuels via redox reactions. As a result, the redox reactions taking place on oxygen carriers can transfer oxygen from an oxidizing zone to a reducing region, which can improve the uniformity of the spatial oxygen distribution. The OCAC technology is a technical adjustment based on the traditional fluidized-bed reactor, which can be applied to various fuel conversion technologies, such as coal-fired large-scale CFB combustion, combustion/gasification technology for low-quality fuels (such as biomass and solid waste), oxy-CFB combustion for carbon capture and storage (CCS), and so on.
1.2 The Objectives of This Book
FBC technology with the advantages of flexible fuel applicability, stable temperature control, inherently low gas-pollutant emissions, etc. is an advanced fuel-conversion technology, applied in industry, and in heat and electric utilities. Theoretically, FBC has good gas–solid mixing and a resulting uniform temperature distribution. In the actual FBC operation, however, especially in large-scale reactors, the mixing of oxygen and fuel is still limited by the lateral solids dispersion coefficient (Dsr) and gas penetration. Such an issue not only reduces the combustion efficiency but also brings a series of problems related to the operation, such as excessive emissions and bed agglomeration.
OCAC technology, which is using oxygen carrier particles to partially or completely replace the traditional inert bed materials in fluidized-bed reactors. The oxygen carrier particles act as oxygen buffers to take up oxygen into their lattice from oxidizing regions and to subsequently react with volatiles in reducing areas, where CO2/CO and H2O/H2 are generated. This technology is aiming to improve combustion efficiency, enhance operational safety, and reduce pollutant emission by promoting the uniformity of the oxygen and temperature distributions in a fluidized-bed reactor. Benefiting from the oxygen buffering characteristic of oxygen carrier particles, OCAC can significantly improve the oxygen distribution throughout the combustion chamber, which can reduce CO and hydrocarbon emissions.
At present, the OCAC technology has already gone through a series of experimental studies at different scales and is considered feasible and economical. The main research institutions on the technology include the Chalmers University of Technology, CanmetENERGY-Ottawa and Vienna University of Technology, etc. Chalmers University of Technology’s research mainly focuses on the oxygen carrier aided air combustion, CanmetENERGY mainly investigates the OC aided oxy-fuel (natural gas, biomass, and coal) combustion, whereas Vienna University of Technology mainly investigates the OC aided gasification. The scientific concerns, including combustion and emission characteristics, ash-related problems, OC reactivation, and so on.
In this book, we intent to summarize the evolution and working principle of OCAC firstly, and then introduce the development status of OC aided solid fuel conversion technology critically from three aspects: OCAC without CO2 capture and with CO2 capture, and OC aided gasification. Some new concepts like OCAC coupled with staged conversion of fuel, OCAC with rotatory kiln, and multi-functional OCAC, are also proposed for the potential applications of OCAC technology. In addition, the future research directions as well as the possible extended strategies based on OCAC technology are outlooked. This is expected to promote a rapid development of OCAC technology in both fundamental research and practical applications.
References
Trambouze PE (2004) Chemical reactors: from design to operation. Editions Technip, Paris
Howard JR (1989) Fluidized bed technology: principles and applications. Adam Higler, New York
Leckner B (2016) Developments in fluidized bed conversion of solid fuels. Therm Sci 20:S1–S18
Koornneef J, Junginger M, Faaij A (2007) Development of fluidized bed combustion—an overview of trends, performance and cost. Prog Energy Combust Sci 33:19–55
Leckner B (1998) Fluidized bed combustion: mixing and pollutant limitation. Prog Energy Combust Sci 24:31–61
Yue G, Cai R, Lu J, Zhang H (2017) From a CFB reactor to a CFB boiler—the review of R&D progress of CFB coal combustion technology in China. Powder Technol 316:18–28
Anthony EJ (1995) Fluidized bed combustion of alternative solid fuels; status, successes and problems of the technology. Prog Energy Combust Sci 21:239–268
Basu P (2006) Combustion and gasification in fluidized beds. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Basu P (1999) Combustion of coal in circulating fluidized-bed boilers: a review. Chem Eng Sci 54:5547–5557
Yue G, Lu J, Zhang H, Yang H, Zhang J, Liu Q, Li Z, Joos E, Jaud P (2005) Design theory of circulating fluidized bed boilers. In: 18th international conference on fluidized bed combustion, pp 135–146
Leckner B, Szentannai P, Winter F (2011) Scale-up of fluidized-bed combustion—a review. Fuel 90:2951–2964
Basu P (2013) Fluidized bed boilers: design and application
Peirano E, Leckner B (1998) Fundamentals of turbulent gas-solid flows applied to circulating fluidized bed combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 24:259–296
Shen L, Johnsson F, Leckner B (2004) Digital image analysis of hydrodynamics two-dimensional bubbling fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 59:2607–2617
Sasic S, Leckner B, Johnsson F (2007) Characterization of fluid dynamics of fluidized beds by analysis of pressure fluctuations. Prog Energy Combust Sci 33:453–496
Johansson A, Johnsson F, Leckner B (2007) Solids back-mixing in CFB boilers. Chem Eng Sci 62:561–573
Johnsson F, Larsson G, Leckner B (2002) Pressure and flow fluctuations in a fluidized bed—interaction with the air-feed system. Chem Eng Sci 57:1379–1392
Kullendorff A, Andersson S (1986) A general review on combustion in circulating fluidized beds. In: Basu P (ed) Circulating fluidized bed technology. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 83–96
Wang L, Hustad JE, Skreiberg Ø, Skjevrak G, Grønli M (2012) A critical review on additives to reduce ash related operation problems in biomass combustion applications. Energy Procedia 20:20–29
Nevalainen H, Jegoroff M, Saastamoinen J, Tourunen A, Jäntti T, Kettunen A et al (2007) Firing of coal and biomass and their mixtures in 50kW and 12MW circulating fluidized beds—phenomenon study and comparison of scales. Fuel 86:2043–2051
Cai R, Zhang M, Mo X, Lyu J, Yang H, Lei X et al (2018) Operation characteristics of external heat exchangers in the 600MW supercritical CFB boiler. Fuel Process Technol 172:65–71
Sivakumar R, Saravanan R, Elaya Perumal A, Iniyan S (2016) Fluidized bed drying of some agro products—a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 61:280–301
Chern JS, Hayhurst AN (2012) Fluidised bed studies of: (i) Reaction-fronts inside a coal particle during its pyrolysis or devolatilisation, (ii) the combustion of carbon in various coal chars. Combust Flame 159:367–375
Agarwal PK, La Nauze RD (1989) Transfer processes local to the coal particle: a review of drying, devolatilization and mass transfer in fluidized bed combustion. Chem Eng Res Des 67:457–480
Gómez-Barea A, Ollero P, Leckner B (2007) Mass transport effects during measurements of gas–solid reaction kinetics in a fluidised bed. Chem Eng Sci 62:1477–1493
Abdelmotalib HM, Youssef MAM, Hassan AA, Youn SB, Im I-T (2015) Heat transfer process in gas–solid fluidized bed combustors: a review. Int J Heat Mass Transf 89:567–575
Andersson B-Å, Leckner B (1992) Experimental methods of estimating heat transfer in circulating fluidized bed boilers. Int J Heat Mass Transf 35:3353–3562
Scala F (2007) Mass transfer around freely moving active particles in the dense phase of a gas fluidized bed of inert particles. Chem Eng Sci 62:4159–4176
Parmar MS, Hayhurst AN (2002) The heat transfer coefficient for a freely moving sphere in a bubbling fluidised bed. Chem Eng Sci 57:3485–3494
Hayhurst AN, Parmar MS (2002) Measurement of the mass transfer coefficient and sherwood number for carbon spheres burning in a bubbling fluidized bed. Combust Flame 130:361–375
Chao J, Lu J, Yang H, Zhang M, Liu Q (2015) Experimental study on the heat transfer coefficient between a freely moving sphere and a fluidized bed of small particles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 80:115–125
Ke X, Cai R, Zhang M, Miao M, Lyu J, Yang H (2018) Application of ultra-low NOx emission control for CFB boilers based on theoretical analysis and industrial practices. Fuel Process Technol 181:252–258
Leckner B, Åmand LE, Lücke K, Werther J (2004) Gaseous emissions from co-combustion of sewage sludge and coal/wood in a fluidized bed. Fuel 83:477–486
Wu L, Qin W, Hu X, Dong C, Yang Y (2015) Mechanism study on the influence of in situ SOx removal on N2O emission in CFB boiler. Appl Surf Sci 333:194–200
Cui J, Duan L, Zhou L, Zhao C (2018) Effects of air pollution control devices on the chlorine emission from 410 t/h circulating fluidized bed boilers co-firing petroleum coke and coal. Energy Fuels 32:4410–4416
Cui J, Duan L, Jiang Y, Zhao C, Anthony EJ (2018) Migration and emission of mercury from circulating fluidized bed boilers co-firing petroleum coke and coal. Fuel 215:638–646
Duan L, Cui J, Jiang Y, Zhao C, Anthony EJ (2017) Partitioning behavior of arsenic in circulating fluidized bed boilers co-firing petroleum coke and coal. Fuel Process Technol 166:107–114
Knowlton TM, Karri SBR, Issangya A (2005) Scale-up of fluidized-bed hydrodynamics. Powder Technol 150:72–77
Detamore MS, Swanson MA, Frender KR, Hrenya CM (2001) A kinetic-theory analysis of the scale-up of circulating fluidized beds. Powder Technol 116:190–203
Desroches-Ducarne E, Marty E, Martin G, Delfosse L (1998) Co-combustion of coal and municipal solid waste in a circulating fluidized bed. Fuel 77:1311–1315
Arena U (2012) Process and technological aspects of municipal solid waste gasification. A review. Waste Management 32:625–639
Chen J, Lu X (2007) Progress of petroleum coke combusting in circulating fluidized bed boilers—a review and future perspectives. Resour Conserv Recycl 49:203–216
Leckner B, Lind F (2020) Combustion of municipal solid waste in fluidized bed or on grate—a comparison. Waste Manage 109:94–108
Lupion M, Alvarez I, Otero P, Kuivalainen R, Lantto J, Hotta A et al (2013) 30 MWth CIUDEN Oxy-cfb boiler—first experiences. Energy Procedia 37:6179–6188
Seddighi KS, Pallarès D, Normann F, Johnsson F (2013) Progress of combustion in an oxy-fuel circulating fluidized-bed furnace: measurements and modeling in a 4 MWth boiler. Energy Fuels 27:6222–6230
Tan Y, Jia L, Wu Y, Anthony EJ (2012) Experiences and results on a 0.8MWth oxy-fuel operation pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed. Applied Energy 92:343–347
Jia L, Tan Y, Anthony EJ (2010) Emissions of SO2 and NOx during Oxy−Fuel CFB combustion tests in a mini-circulating fluidized bed combustion reactor. Energy Fuels 24:910–915
Duan L, Sun H, Zhao C, Zhou W, Chen X (2014) Coal combustion characteristics on an oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed combustor with warm flue gas recycle. Fuel 127:47–51
Leckner B, Gómez-Barea A (2014) Oxy-fuel combustion in circulating fluidized bed boilers. Appl Energy 125:308–318
Anthony EJ, Preto F (1995) Pressurized combustion in FBC systems. In: Cuenca MA, Anthony EJ (eds) Pressurized fluidized bed combustion. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 80–120
Cai N, Zhang M, Li D, Fu W (1994) Research and development on PFBC-CC in China and Jiawang pilot plant project. J Therm Sci 3:205–210
Lasek JA, Janusz M, Zuwała J, Głód K, Iluk A (2013) Oxy-fuel combustion of selected solid fuels under atmospheric and elevated pressures. Energy 62:105–112
Lasek JA, Głód K, Janusz M, Kazalski K, Zuwała J (2012) Pressurized oxy-fuel combustion: a study of selected parameters. Energy Fuels 26:6492–6500
Wang J, Duan Y, Duan L, Yan Y, Tong S, Zhao C (2019) Sulfur enrichment in particulate matter generated from a lab-scale pressurized fluidized bed combustor. Energy Fuels 33:603–611
Duan Y, Duan L, Wang J, Anthony EJ (2019) Observation of simultaneously low CO, NOx and SO2 emission during oxy-coal combustion in a pressurized fluidized bed. Fuel 242:374–381
Li L, Duan Y, Duan L, Xu C, Anthony EJ (2018) Flow characteristics in pressurized oxy-fuel fluidized bed under hot condition. Int J Multiph Flow 108:1–10
Ishida M, Jin H (1994) A new advanced power-generation system using chemical-looping combustion. Energy 19:415–422
Lyngfelt A, Leckner B, Mattisson T (2001) A fluidized-bed combustion process with inherent CO2 separation; application of chemical-looping combustion. Chem Eng Sci 56:3101–3113
Adanez J, Abad A, Garcia-Labiano F, Gayan P, de Diego LF (2012) Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38:215–282
Song T, Shen L (2018) Review of reactor for chemical looping combustion of solid fuels. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 76:92–110
Xiao R, Song Q, Song M, Lu Z, Zhang S, Shen L (2010) Pressurized chemical-looping combustion of coal with an iron ore-based oxygen carrier. Combust Flame 157:1140–1153
Wang X, Wang X, Kong Z, Shao Y, Jin B (2020) Auto-thermal operation and optimization of coal-fueled separated gasification chemical looping combustion in a pilot-scale unit. Chem Eng J 383:123159
Liu D, Chen X (2010) Lateral solids dispersion coefficient in large-scale fluidized beds. Combust Flame 157:2116–2124
Salinero J, Gómez-Barea A, Fuentes-Cano D, Leckner B (2018) Measurement and theoretical prediction of char temperature oscillation during fluidized bed combustion. Combust Flame 192:190–204
Breault RW (2006) A review of gas–solid dispersion and mass transfer coefficient correlations in circulating fluidized beds. Powder Technol 163:9–17
Agarwal PK, Mitchell WJ, La Nauze RD (1988) Transport phenomena in multi-particle systems—III. Active particle mass transfer in fluidized beds of inert particles. Chemical Engineering Science 43:2511–2521
Winaya INS, Shimizu T, Yamada D (2007) A new method to evaluate horizontal solid dispersion in a bubbling fluidized bed. Powder Technol 178:173–178
Chirone R, Miccio F, Scala F (2004) On the relevance of axial and transversal fuel segregation during the FB combustion of a biomass. Energy Fuels 18:1108–1117
Niklasson F, Thunman H, Johnsson F, Leckner B (2002) Estimation of solids mixing in a fluidized-bed combustor. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:4663–4673
Schlichthaerle P, Werther J (2001) Solids mixing in the bottom zone of a circulating fluidized bed. Powder Technol 120:21–33
Duan L, Li L, Liu D, Zhao C (2019) Fundamental study on fuel-staged oxy-fuel fluidized bed combustion. Combust Flame 206:227–238
Dennis JS, Hayhurst AN, Scott SA (2006) The combustion of large particles of char in bubbling fluidized beds: the dependence of Sherwood number and the rate of burning on particle diameter. Combust Flame 147:185–194
Scala F (2009) A new technique for the measurement of the product CO/CO2 ratio at the surface of char particles burning in a fluidized bed. Proc Combust Inst 32:2021–2027
Qin K, Thunman H, Leckner B (2017) Mass transfer under segregation conditions in fluidized beds. Fuel 195:105–112
Larsson A (2014) Fuel conversion in a dual fluidized bed gasifier. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology
Cooke RB, Goodson MJ, Hayhurst AN (2003) The combustion of solid wastes as studied in a fluidized bed. Process Saf Environ Prot 81:156–165
Thunman H, Lind F, Breitholtz C, Berguerand N, Seemann M (2013) Using an oxygen-carrier as bed material for combustion of biomass in a 12-MWth circulating fluidized-bed boiler. Fuel 113:300–309
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duan, L., Li, L. (2023). Introduction. In: Oxygen-Carrier-Aided Combustion Technology for Solid-Fuel Conversion in Fluidized Bed. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9127-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9127-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9126-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9127-1
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)