Abstract
This section analyzes the factors that enabled Japan to be the first “latecomer” nation to successfully industrialize. It emphasizes the synergy between three different types of managers—owner-managers, salaried managers, and investor-managers—working together to advance the Japanese economy and achieve breakthrough innovations.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
General Requirements for Latecomer Nations’ Industrialization
Japan’s rapid industrialization process from the Meiji period onward can be regarded as a typical example of latecomer industrialization in world history. As Alexander Gerschenkron has argued, such latecomer countries’ achievement may have been relatively rapid through the use of borrowed technology and capital already accumulated by developed countries. but the lack of capital, markets, skilled labor, technicians, and entrepreneurship necessitate coordination between the government and banks, as well as certain ideologies.Footnote 1 In Japan specifically, the government, financial institutions, trading companies, shipping companies, and others played an important role in the process of industrialization, as did the ideology of “business management nationalism.”Footnote 2
The emergence of numerous government-owned factories and mines in the period immediately after the Meiji Restoration as part of the “industrial development policy,” and the implementation of a series of industrial promotion policies through “Sino-Japanese Postwar Management” and “Russo-Japanese Postwar Management,” are evidence that the government played a major role in Japan’s industrialization. However, the government’s role should not be overemphasized. Many of the government-run factories and mines failed to flourish, their full development commencing only after they were sold off to the private sector,Footnote 3 starting in 1880 (Meiji 13), and reconstituted as private companies. The shipping, shipbuilding, and steel industries that were the target of the “Sino-Japanese Postwar Management” and “Russo-Japanese Postwar Management” programs, thrived in the private sector even as they received political support. For example, the opening of the government-run Yawata Steel Works in 1901 was followed by the establishment of Sumitomo Steel Casting in 1901; the start of flat furnace steelmaking at Kamaishi Iron Works in 1903; the establishment of Kobe Steel Works in 1905; the construction of a steel forging plant at Kawasaki Dockyard in 1906; the establishment of Nippon Steel Works in 1907; and other active developments in private steel manufacturing.
Thus, Japan’s industrialization process was not necessarily government-led, but rather progressed in a mutually complementary manner between the government and the private sector. Referring to Gerschenkron’s argument, Keiichiro Nakagawa emphasizes the important role played by trade-related “organized entrepreneurial activities” in Japan’s industrialization process.Footnote 4 In order for the cotton and silk industries to become internationally competitive, trading companies,Footnote 5 shipping companies, banks, and marine insurance companies made significant contributions, serving as “the infrastructure of modern industry.”Footnote 6 Gershenkron’s and Nakagawa’s arguments relate to the prerequisites for industrialization that are applicable not only to Japan but also to other late starter nations in general. However, discussions on Japan’s industrialization should go beyond identifying prerequisites for industrialization in late developers, as Japan was the first country outside of Europe and the United States to achieve industrialization.
Unique Conditions That Made Japan the First Case of Successful Industrialization Among Latecomer Nations
What were the unique conditions that enabled Japan to achieve industrialization ahead of other late developers? As just noted, Japan’s achievement can be explained by the fact that “economic development was not necessarily government-led; instead, government and private enterprises complemented each other.”
How, then, did Japan’s private sector manage to be more active than those in other less developed countries? By effectively utilizing scarce resources such as human and financial capital. To summarize:
-
1.
In terms of human capital, owner-managers enabled salaried managers to play an active role, with educational support of investor-managers.
-
2.
In terms of financial capital, salaried managers used owner-managers’ financial resources to pursue industrialization, along with investor-managers mobilizing funds from the public at an early stage among the public through joint-stock companies.
Interplay Among the Three Types of Managers
The case studies in the second half of Part I illustrate that as the scale of business grew, and diversification progressed, owner-managers could no longer carry out business management on their own and needed the assistance of salaried managers. A typical example: the active appointment of salaried managers by Yataro and Yanosuke Iwasaki, who formed the Mitsubishi zaibatsu, becoming active promoters of industrialization. Moreover, some owner-managers (e.g., Soichiro Asano and Ichibei Furukawa) without sufficient fund-raising capacity established joint stock companies or used bank loans at an early stage, relying on investor-managers such as Eiichi Shibusawa, the president of Dai-Ichi Bank. The latter also educated businessmen and helped establish and develop many institutions of higher learning. For instance, graduates of Tokyo Higher Commercial School joined many large corporations, including Mitsui & Co., thriving as salaried managers.
In addition, owner-managers sometimes complemented their lack of management resources through mutual alliances such as that between Zenjiro Yasuda, who formed a financial zaibatsu, and Soichiro Asano, who built an industrial zaibatsu.
In sum, by working together in several ways the three types of businessmen—owner-managers, salaried managers, and investor-managers—demonstrably pushed Japan’s industrialization process forward.
Early Take-Off as the Outcome of Breakthrough Innovations
The first of the three questions presented in the Introduction was: “How did the Japanese economy manage to take off so early and establish a trajectory of growth?” In the closing of Part I, which covers the Edo period to the post Russo-Japanese War period, the answer emerges: “Japan’s early take-off was the outcome of breakthrough innovations.”
As seen earlier, Zen’emon Konoike, Takatoshi Mitsui, and Genzaemon Nakai developed innovative business models during the Edo period. Though their business innovations might not necessarily be considered breakthrough innovations when evaluated from a global perspective, given that Japan was cut off at the time from the rest of the world by its isolationist policy, Japanese innovation can be considered sui generis. Thus, it is fair to say that these leaders were among the world’s first breakthrough innovators.
Their success, in turn, highlighted the “novelties” of the Edo period—a feudal society with a well-developed market economy whose pre-industrial “novelties” served as an important prerequisite for the Japanese economy’s early takeoff, a period represented by six innovative businessmen: Hikojiro Nakamigawa, a salaried manager; Yataro Iwasaki, Yanosuke Iwasaki, Zenjiro Yasuda, and Soichiro Asano, owner-managers; and Eiichi Shibusawa, an investor-manager—all active from the late Edo period to the post-Russo-Japanese War period.
True, many of their aforementioned business innovations cannot be called “world’s firsts,” but rather were incremental innovations. However, the unique system of their mutually facilitative collaboration became the driving force turning Japan into the first industrialized nation outside of Europe and the United States. In this sense, the entrepreneurs discussed in the latter half of Part I can be regarded as the embodiment of breakthrough innovations of historical, global significance, contributing to the world’s “first latecomer industrialization”—truly an “Era of Breakthrough Innovations.”
With the individual breakthrough innovations of the Edo period as a prerequisite, the comprehensive breakthrough innovations of the period from the opening of ports at the end of the Edo period to the end of the Russo-Japanese War directly triggered the first industrialization in Japan among the least developed countries. This is why we called the period of Part I the “Era of Breakthrough Innovation”.
Notes
- 1.
Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- 2.
Morikawa, H. (1973). Nihon-gata keiei no genryu: Keiei nashonarizumu no kigyorinen (The roots of Japanese-style management: Corporate philosophy of management nationalism). Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Inc.
- 3.
For the privatization of governmental businesses, see Kobayashi, M. (1977). Nihon no kogyoka to kangyoharaisage (Japan’s industrialization and sale of government projects). Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Inc.
- 4.
Nakagawa, K. (1967). Nihon no kogyoka katei ni okeru soshikika sareta kigyosha katsudo (Organized entrepreneurial activity in the process of Japan’s industrialization). Keieishigaku (Japan Business History Review), 2(3).
- 5.
For development of business by Japanese trading companies, see Yamazaki, H. (1987). Nihon shosha-shi no ronri (The logic of the history of Japanese trading companies). In The University of Tokyo, Shakaigaku kenkyu (Journal of Social Science), 39(4).
- 6.
See Tatsuki, M. (1995). Kogyoka to shosha, kaiun, kinyu (Industrialization and trading company, marine transport, and finance). In M. Miyamoto, & T. Abe (Eds.), Nihon keieishi 2: Keiei kakushin to kogyoka (Japanese business history 2: Management innovation and industrialization). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this chapter or parts of it.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 Kreab K.K.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kikkawa, T. (2023). Discussion Point 2: How Did Japan’s Economy Manage to Take Off So Early? Conditions That Enabled the First Successful Industrialization Case Among Latecomer Nations. In: History of Innovative Entrepreneurs in Japan. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9454-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9454-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9453-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9454-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)