Abstract
Fiber bundles are an important component of woven composite materials, and predicting the mechanical properties of fiber bundles can provide a basis for the study of the mechanical properties of woven composite materials. This paper establishes the micro representative volume element (RVE) model of composite materials, and obtains the equivalent elastic constant of yarn through the model homogenization theory and periodic boundary conditions. Strength prediction is performed through the VUMAT user subroutine of ABAQUS. This paper uses the maximum stress standards and Von Mises standards to predict the damage initiation of TC33 carbon fiber and epoxy resin matrix, respectively. Combined with the constant degradation method, the simulation of the damage behaviors of the micro model is achieved, and the equivalent strength of the fiber bundle is obtained. The effectiveness and correctness of this method are verified by comparing the numerical model results with the Chamis theoretical model results. The accurate prediction of mechanical properties and damage process of fiber bundles provides theoretical support for the analysis of mechanical properties of composites, and has guiding significance for the performance design of composite materials.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Keywords
1 Introduction
Composite material is a kind of multiphase material composed of two or more materials. Compared with raw material, composite material has the advantages of high specific stiffness, high specific strength and designability [1]. The fibers are mixed with the matrix to form fiber bundles, which is woven and mixed with the matrix to form a woven composite material, as shown in Fig. 1.
In order to make better use of composite materials, it is necessary to understand the stiffness and strength properties of composite materials, and the relationship between these properties and the components of composite materials. In order to meet the requirements of engineering, the mechanical properties of fiber bundles can be predicted to predict the properties of composites, which can provide reference for the design and optimization of composites.
For predicting the mechanical properties of fiber bundles, there are mainly theoretical formulas and finite element methods. In the classical RVE, fiber distribution is considered to be uniform and uniform. Jha [2] established a cell model with uniform fiber distribution, studied the effects of fiber geometry and fiber volume fraction on the mechanical properties of composites. It was found that the fiber geometry had an effect on the transverse Young’s modulus, the influence on the axial Young’s modulus is negligible. Wang [3] used the finite element method to establish the unit cell model of micro-fiber bundle with uniform and random distribution of fibers in carbon fiber bundles, and carried on the analysis to it, the equivalent elastic modulus and strength of the fiber bundle are predicted, and the difference of the damage caused by the arrangement is compared. Vignoli [4] established the prediction model of tensile strength and shear strength of unidirectional fiber composites, and compared with other prediction models, it was found that the prediction accuracy of this method was higher. Han [5] established a microscopic RVE model of random distribution of fibers and studied the damage initiation and evolution of unidirectional fiber composites under various loads, the main failure modes of axial compression are fiber buckling and matrix collapse. Therefore, It is important to predict the modulus and strength of fiber bundles and analyze the damage evolution of fiber bundles by using the fiber random distribution cells.
In this paper, the mechanical properties of fiber bundles are obtained by establishing a representative volume element finite element model and applying periodic boundary conditions, compared with the classical Chamis model, the method is proved to be effective. The damage evolution of the micro-scale cell is analyzed, and the generation and development of the damage of the fiber bundle are explained.
2 Periodic Boundary Conditions
For the periodic arrangement of micro fiber bundle RVE models, two conditions should be met simultaneously at the cell boundary: (1) deformation coordination, and (2) stress continuity, as shown in Fig. 2.
For a cell model with parallel and paired boundaries, Xia [6] proposed a periodic boundary conditions suitable for finite element analysis, which requires that the meshes on opposite surfaces are the same. A periodic displacement field is applied to the surface of the RVE representative volume element, which can obtain the relevant effective elastic coefficiency based on the microscopic mechanical response. The expression form of periodic displacement field is:
where \(\varepsilon_{ik}\) is the average strain of the single cell structure, \(x_{k}\) is the position function at any position within the single cell, and \(u_{i}^{*}\) is the strain correction. The boundary conditions on one side of the rectangular cuboid cell structure can be expressed as:
The boundary conditions of its opposite surface are:
Subtracting the boundary conditions on one side from the boundary conditions on the other side yields:
3 The Solution of Equivalent Elastic Constants of RVE Model
3.1 Establishment of RVE Model
The research object of this article is carbon fiber reinforced resin based fiber bundles, usually assuming that carbon fibers are unidirectionally distributed in the matrix and have a circular cross-section. Fiber bundles can be regarded as many single cell structures arranged periodically in three spatial directions. Therefore, a representative volume element (RVE) can be selected to establish a single cell model with random fiber distribution to calculate the performance of fiber bundles.
Using the Random Sequence Adsorption (RSA) method [7], a cubic RVE model was established for the random distribution of fibers in the matrix, as shown in Fig. 3, with a unit cell size of 35 μm × 35 μm × 35 μm. This article studies the case where the volume content of fibers in fiber bundles is 65.12%. It is specified that the fiber arrangement direction is in the x direction and the vertical fiber direction is in the y and z directions. The model is meshed by voxel grid, and the element type is C3D8R (eight node linear Hexahedron element, reduced integral, hourglass control), a total of 27,000 elements. The RVE model modeling parameters are shown in Table 1.
The RVE includes the matrix phase and the fiber phase, as shown in Fig. 3, the matrix is an isotropic material, and the carbon fiber is a transverse anisotropic material. All material parameters are taken from reference [8, 9], as shown in Tables 2 and 3.
3.2 Solution of Equivalent Elastic Constant
Apply the periodic boundary conditions mentioned in Sect. 2 to the RVE model to obtain the stress nephogram in all directions as shown in Fig. 4.
From Fig. 4a, it can be seen that when subjected to tension along the fiber direction, the RVE has the maximum modulus, and the fiber bears most of the load. Compared with the other stress nephogram in Fig. 4, the tensile modulus in Y and Z directions and the shear modulus in XY, XZ and YZ directions are relatively small, and the fiber is no longer subject to most forces. From the Stress–strain curve of the results, the prediction data of equivalent elastic constants of carbon fiber bundles can be obtained as shown in Table 4.
The Chamis theoretical model [10] is a classic model for the equivalent mechanical constants of composite materials, in which the prediction formula for the equivalent elastic constants of unidirectional composite materials is as follows:
where \(E_{{{\text{f}}1}}\), \(E_{{{\text{f}}2}}\) are axial and transverse elastic modulus of fiber, respectively. \(G_{{{\text{f}}12}}\), \(G_{{{\text{f}}23}}\) are axial and transverse shear modulus of fiber, respectively. \(E_{{\text{m}}}\) is matrix elastic modulus. \(G_{{\text{m}}}\) is matrix shear modulus. \(\mu_{{\text{m}}}\) is matrix Poisson ratio. \(V_{{\text{f}}}\) is fiber volume fraction.
The predicted elastic constants in all directions of the fiber bundle obtained from the theoretical model are shown in Table 4. Because the established finite element model is a random distribution of fibers, the predicted fiber bundles are anisotropic materials. However, in Chamis theory, it is assumed that the fibers are uniformly arranged, and the predicted fiber bundles are transversely isotropic materials. So for finite element models, there are differences in modulus between the transverse and axial directions, while in theoretical predictions, the transverse modulus is equal to the axial modulus. Compare the average values of the axial and transverse modulus results of the finite element method with the Chamis theory results, and the numerical values and relative errors are shown in Table 4.
From the relative errors in Table 4, it can be seen that the results of finite element simulation have a certain degree of accuracy. The error along the fiber direction is the smallest, while the error in the vertical fiber direction is slightly larger. The reason is that in the unit cell model built in this article, the fibers are randomly distributed, while in Chamis theory, the fibers are assumed to be uniformly and neatly arranged, and the random arrangement of fibers is closer to the actual situation. Moreover, the Shear modulus does not consider the influence of the interface between the fiber and the matrix, which will lead to a certain gap in the results.
4 RVE Model Strength Analysis
4.1 Material Performance Degradation Plan and Analysis Process
Fiber bundles are composed of fibers and matrices, and VUMAT subroutines are written to first determine the type of unit and run different strength standards for different units. Among them, epoxy resin matrix is considered an isotropic linear elastic material, and various strength standards applicable to isotropic materials can determine matrix damage. If it is a matrix unit, the Von Mises standards [11] is used to determine the failure of the unit. The formula is:
If it is judged as a fiber unit, use the maximum stress standards to determine the damage of the fiber. When any of the three directions in space reaches the strength value of the fiber in that direction, the fiber begins to fail. The specific formula is as follows:
where \(X_{ift}\), \(X_{ifc}\), \(S_{ijf}\) are the tensile strength, compressive strength and shear strength of the fiber in three directions.
Based on the above damage evolution theory, the fiber and matrix constitutive equation, failure criteria and stiffness reduction programs were written in Fortran language, and the damage evolution process of cells was simulated using the VUMAT subroutine in ABAQUS. The damage evolution of materials is a process of gradual accumulation. After loading the model, calculate the strain, stiffness matrix and stress, and judge whether the material fails according to the failure criteria. If there is no failure, update the stress and strain, and if there is failure, update the stiffness matrix.
4.2 Analysis of Numerical Simulation Results
Based on the above research, the microscopic unit cell model is established, periodic boundary conditions are applied, and the connection between the loading point (reference point RP) and the corresponding node is established, as shown in the figure. Apply X, Y, and Z directions to a single cell, with a displacement of 20% of the cell’s side length, which is 7 μm setting unit deletability and setting unit deletion variables, using explicit analysis, can effectively simulate the degradation and failure of such materials. The obtained stress–strain results are shown in the Figs. 5, 6, 7, and 8.
The stress–strain curve in the axial direction is almost linear, because the fibers are the main force under axial force, and the strength is also determined by the fibers. When subjected to lateral forces, the matrix is mainly subjected to force, so the stress–strain curve exhibits a non-linear characteristic. The highest point of the Stress–strain curve is taken as the strength value, and the predicted results are shown in Table 5.
From Fig. 9, it can be seen that due to the much greater tensile strength of TC33 carbon fiber in the axial direction than the resin matrix, during the progressive damage process, the resin matrix will first undergo damage, followed by subsequent fiber damage and failure. Strain in Fig. 9a ε = 0.54%, the fibers and matrix have not yet been damaged, and the fibers bear most of the tensile load. The performance of the matrix gradually deteriorates, and the elastic modulus slowly decreases. When strain ε = 1.31%, as shown in Fig. 9b, the matrix has been damaged, but the material still has load-bearing capacity as the fibers have not been damaged. When loaded into ε = 1.49%, the carbon fiber loses its load-bearing capacity, and the fiber bundle immediately fails after the fiber breaks, resulting in a decrease in stress to 0. As shown in Fig. 9c, when ε = 1.51%, the single cell model has completely failed, and both the fiber and matrix have lost their load-bearing capacity.
The Chamis theoretical model also proposes a strength prediction formula for composite materials:
where \(X_{{{\text{f}}T}}\), \(X_{{{\text{fC}}}}\) are fiber tensile strength and compressive strength, \(S_{{{\text{mT}}}}\), \(S_{{{\text{mC}}}}\), \(S_{{{\text{mS}}}}\) are tensile strength, compressive strength and Shear strength of matrix.
According to the Chamis strength prediction model, the strength of the fiber bundle in all directions was calculated, and the results are shown in Table 5. X, Y, Z are directions, subscript T is the tensile strength, C is compressive strength, S is the shear strength, 1, 2, 3 are shear in x, y, z directions.
For the prediction of axial strength, the finite element simulation results are in good agreement with the Chamis theory results, as the tensile and compressive loads along the fiber direction are mainly borne by the fibers and are not significantly related to the cross-sectional shape and distribution of the fibers. For the prediction of lateral strength, the Chamis model assumes that the fibers are uniformly and neatly arranged, while the fiber random arrangement model in this article is closer to the actual situation. However, the influence of the interface between fibers and matrix on strength was not considered in the model in this article, which will result in certain errors. Overall, the relative error between the strength prediction results in each direction and the theoretical model is within an acceptable range, verifying the feasibility of the prediction method in this paper.
And from Table 5, it can be seen that the axial modulus and axial tensile strength of fiber bundle materials are the highest, with 149.86Â GPa and 2239.74Â MPa, respectively, while the transverse modulus and tensile strength are only 9.97Â GPa and 41.14Â MPa. It indicates that fiber bundles have good mechanical properties in the fiber direction, while other directions have poor performance. In engineering applications, it is necessary to consider the differences in mechanical properties in different directions and make more effective use of materials.
5 Conclusions
This article uses the representative volume unit method to obtain the equivalent modulus of fiber bundle cells, and combines the constant degradation method to predict the progressive damage process. The damage evolution of the microscopic model and the equivalent strength of the fiber bundle are obtained, and the following conclusions are drawn:
-
(1)
The prediction results of the mechanical properties of micro fiber bundles using finite element simulation method are in good agreement with the classical Chamis theoretical model, verifying the effectiveness of the finite element method.
-
(2)
The axial modulus and strength of fiber bundle materials are much greater than the transverse modulus and strength. This indicates that fiber bundle materials have good mechanical properties in the fiber direction, while other directions have poor performance. In engineering applications, it is necessary to consider the differences in mechanical properties in different directions and make more effective use of materials.
-
(3)
By using a progressive damage model, the microscopic damage evolution process of fiber bundles is obtained, where fibers play the main load-bearing role, while the matrix plays the role of transmitting stress. The failure of fiber bundles is determined by the failure of fibers.
References
Soutis C (2005) Carbon fiber reinforced plastics in aircraft construction. Mater Sci Eng A 412(1):171–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.064
Jha NK, Kumar S, Tyagi A, Jha DK, Jha CS (2022) Micromechanical property and stress analysis of fiber reinforced composite using finite element analysis (Simpsons method). Mater Today Proc 50:1671–1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.148
Wang M, Zhang PW, Fei QG, Guo F (2020) Modified micro-mechanics based multiscale model for progressive failure prediction of 2D twill woven composites. Chin J Aeronaut 33(7):2070–2087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.10.009
Vignoli LL, Savi MA, Pacheco PM, Kalamkarov AL (2020) (2020) Micromechanical analysis of longitudinal and shear strength of composite laminae. J Compos Mater 54(30):4853–4873. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998320936343
Han G, Guan Z, Li X, Zhang W, Du S (2015) Microscopic progressive damage simulation of unidirectional composite based on the elastic–plastic theory. J Reinf Plast Compos 34(3):232–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684414567745
Xia Z, Zhang Y, Ellyin F (2003) A unified periodical boundary conditions for representative volume elements of composites and applications. Int J Solids Struct 40(8):1907–1921. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00024-6
Pan Y, Iorga L, Pelegri AA (2008) Numerical generation of a random chopped fiber composite RVE and its elastic properties. Compos Sci Technol 68(13):2792–2798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.007
Zhu C, Zhu P, Liu Z, Tao W (2018) Numerical investigation of fiber random distribution on the mechanical properties of yarn in-plain woven carbon fiber-reinforced composite based on a new perturbation algorithm. J Compos Mater 52(6):755–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998317714856
Guo-dong F, Jun L, Bao-lai W (2009) Progressive damage and nonlinear analysis of 3D four-directional braided composites under unidirectional tension. Compos Struct 89(1):126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.07.016
Chamis CC (2013) Micromechanics-based progressive failure analysis prediction for WWFE-III composite coupon test cases. J Compos Mater 47(20–21):2695–2712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998313499478
Giraldo-Londoño O, Paulino GH (2020) A unified approach for topology optimization with local stress constraints considering various failure criteria: von Mises, Drucker-Prager, Tresca, Mohr-Coulomb, Bresler–Pister and Willam-Warnke. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 476(2238):20190861. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0861
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Guo, R., Yan, R. (2024). Prediction of Mechanical Properties and Analysis of Damage Evolution of Fiber Bundles in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composite Materials. In: Halgamuge, S.K., Zhang, H., Zhao, D., Bian, Y. (eds) The 8th International Conference on Advances in Construction Machinery and Vehicle Engineering. ICACMVE 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1876-4_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1876-4_50
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-97-1875-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-97-1876-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)