Abstract
The conventional alternating current field measurement (ACFM) technique evaluates the crack dimensions by the distance between Bz peaks and the Bx trough. The interaction of the crack length and depth on the characteristic signals is not considered before, which results in the low accuracy evaluation results of crack dimensions and profiles. In the light of the problems above, the 3D simulation model of ACFM is set up in the underwater environment. The influence rules of the crack length and depth on the characteristic signals are analyzed. On this basis, the two-step interpolation crack dimensions evaluation algorithm and the segmentation interpolation crack profiles reconstruction algorithm are presented to achieve high-precision evaluation of crack dimensions and profiles. The underwater ACFM testing system is set up and the crack detection experiments are carried out. The results show that the crack depth does not affect the distance between the peak and trough of the Bz. The crack length that is shorter than 30 mm affects the trough of the Bx. The two-step interpolation algorithm based on the Bx and Bz can achieve high-precision evaluation of the crack length and depth. The maximum errors of the evaluated length and depth are 3.0 and 7.5% respectively. The segmentation interpolation algorithm based on the Bx can achieve high-precision visual reconstruction of the crack profile. The maximum error of the reconstructed profile is 5.7%.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Keywords
1 Introduction
Alternating Current Field Measurement (ACFM) technology is a newly emerging electromagnetic non-destructive testing technology in recent years. It has many advantages such as lift-off insensitivity, non-contact detection, no need to clean structural attachments and coatings, and quantitative detection. It has been widely used in underwater structures, high-speed rail, nuclear power and non-destructive testing of surface defects of special equipment [1,2,3]. The alternating current magnetic field relies on a rectangular excitation coil to induce a uniform current on the surface of the conductive test block. The induced current passes through the crack vertically, gathers at both ends of the crack, causing the magnetic field (Bz) perpendicular to the direction of the test block to generate positive and negative peaks at both ends of the crack. Therefore, the distance between the positive and negative peaks of Bz reflects the crack length information; the induced current alternately generates peaks and valleys in the magnetic field (By) perpendicular to the direction of the crack at the end of the crack [4,5,6]; the induced current bypasses the bottom of the crack center, the current density at the center of the crack weakens, causing the magnetic field (Bx) along the direction of the crack to generate a valley [7], the valley reflects the crack depth information, as shown in Fig. 1.
Under normal circumstances, the crack length can be obtained based on the distance between the peaks and valleys of the characteristic signal Bz, and the approximate depth of the crack can be obtained based on the change in the valley of the characteristic signal Bx. However, due to the large error between the crack length and the distance between the peaks and valleys of the characteristic signal Bz, and the impact of the crack length on the Bx valley, the traditional characteristic signal evaluation method has a large error, affecting the evaluation of the remaining life of the structure and maintenance decisions. W. D. Dover, A. M. Lewi, etc. established the classic ACFM theoretical model, and gave an analytical model of the electromagnetic field disturbance around the crack based on the two-dimensional plane assumption and uniform induced current [8, 9]. Hu Shuhui and others proposed a linear interpolation method to invert the crack length and depth dimensions [10]. A. L. Ribeiro and others gave a forward model of the crack and characteristic signal under uniform induced current [11]. G. L. Nicholson and others applied ACFM to the detection and evaluation of cluster rolling contact fatigue (RCF) cracks in rails [12, 13]. R. K. Amineh [14] and others proposed a crack depth evaluation method under different lift-off heights based on the model inversion algorithm. The research group and other scholars have proposed a crack size inversion algorithm based on neural network self-learning in previous studies [15,16,17,18]. The above research uses the characteristic signal Bx to analyze the crack depth, and uses the characteristic signal Bz to analyze the crack length, laying the foundation for the ACFM detection and evaluation of the crack. However, the above studies did not consider the interaction between the crack length and depth on the characteristic signals Bx and Bz, resulting in insufficient evaluation accuracy. In addition, self-learning methods such as neural networks require a large amount of sample data, which is difficult to apply and implement quickly on site.
In response to the above problems, this paper establishes a three-dimensional finite element simulation model of ACFM in a seawater environment, analyzes in detail the interaction rules of the changes in crack length and depth on characteristic signals, and proposes a two-step interpolation crack size evaluation algorithm and a segmented interpolation crack profile reconstruction algorithm. This provides an effective method for real-time detection and high-precision evaluation of cracks in underwater structures.
2 Marine Environment ACFM Simulation Model
A three-dimensional simulation model of ACFM in a seawater environment is established using the ANSYS finite element simulation software [19, 20]. As shown in Fig. 2, the simulation model mainly consists of an excitation coil, a U-shaped manganese-zinc ferrite magnetic core, a steel plate test block, and a crack defect. The excitation coil is wound on the manganese-zinc ferrite crossbeam, and an alternating current of 0.1 A with a frequency of 2000 Hz is loaded on the excitation coil. To realistically simulate the distribution of the electromagnetic field in the seawater environment, the inside of the simulation model probe is filled with air, and the outside is surrounded by the seawater environment. The characteristic parameters of the simulation model are shown in Table 1, and the structural parameters are shown in Table 2.
The current vector diagram on the surface of the steel plate test block in the simulation model is extracted, as shown in Fig. 3a. It can be seen that the excitation coil induces a uniform current on the surface of the test block, and the current passes through the crack vertically, gathering at both ends and deflecting in opposite directions. The current density on the surface of the steel plate test block is extracted, as shown in Fig. 3b. The current density gathers at the end of the crack to form a maximum peak, and the induced current bypasses from the bottom of the crack to form a valley in the center of the crack, causing Bx to appear a valley at the center of the crack, as shown in Fig. 4a. Due to the different deflection directions, the disturbance current causes Bz to present positive and negative peaks at the position of the crack end, as shown in Fig. 4b. The change rules of the characteristic signals Bx and Bz in the simulation model in the seawater environment are consistent with the ACFM principle.
The characteristic signal Bx is related to the crack depth because the current bypasses in the direction of the crack depth, and the peaks and valleys of the characteristic signal Bz are located at the two ends of the crack, so the distance between the peaks and valleys reflects the crack length. However, the changes in crack length and depth have an interactive effect on the characteristic signals Bz and Bx, and a single change in length or depth is not the only factor affecting the characteristic signals. In order to determine the influence of crack size changes on the characteristic signals Bx and Bz, the characteristic signals of different size cracks are analyzed with the help of simulation.
3 Two-Step Interpolation Algorithm
Four groups of simulation models with different sizes of cracks were established, all with a crack width of 0.5 m. The first group of simulation models are cracks of the same length (10 mm) with different depths (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 mm). The second group is cracks of the same length (20 mm) with different depths (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 mm). The third group is cracks of the same length (30 mm) with different depths (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 mm). The fourth group is cracks of the same length (40 mm) with different depths (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 mm). The fifth group is cracks of the same length (50 mm) with different depths (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 mm). The distance between the positive and negative peaks of the characteristic signal Bz is defined as PBz, and the PBz change graph of cracks with different depths is obtained, as shown in Fig. 5a. The change rule of PBz of the characteristic signal with different depths is basically consistent with the crack length, indicating that PBz is basically not affected by the crack depth.
In order to compare the distortion amplitude of the characteristic signals of cracks at different depths, and to eliminate the influence of linear parameters such as current and coil turns on the simulation or experimental results, the sensitivity of the characteristic signal Bx is defined as SBx.
The sensitivity SBx of the maximum value position distortion of the characteristic signal of cracks of different lengths is obtained, as shown in Fig. 5b. The characteristic signal Bx is mainly the secondary magnetic field distortion caused by the current disturbance in the center of the crack, and the Bx disturbance situation is more obviously affected by the depth of the crack, and the Bx sensitivity of the characteristic signal of cracks of different depths differs greatly. At the same time, the length of the crack also affects the disturbance of the current in the depth direction. The current in the center of the shorter crack is affected by the length of the crack, causing the maximum sensitivity change of Bx. When the crack extends to a certain extent, the induced current in the center of the crack reaches a minimum and is not affected by the length of the crack, and the Bx sensitivity of the characteristic signal is also not affected by the length of the crack. As can be seen from Fig. 5b, when the crack length is greater than 30 mm, the Bx sensitivity of the characteristic signal of cracks of different lengths basically remains consistent. When the crack length is less than 30 mm, there is a large difference in the sensitivity of the characteristic signal of cracks of different lengths.
In summary, the peak-to-valley distance of the characteristic signal Bz is affected by the crack length and is not affected by the change in crack depth; the sensitivity of the characteristic signal Bx is affected by the crack depth and is also affected by the crack length. Based on the above rules, in order to achieve high-precision evaluation of cracks, a two-step interpolation algorithm based on characteristic signals Bx and Bz is proposed, with the following specific steps:
-
(1)
Use the characteristic signal Bz to obtain the peak-to-valley distance PBz, and use PBz to obtain the crack length L.
-
(2)
When the crack length L ≥ 30 mm, the sensitivity SBx and the crack depth interpolation formula are obtained by simulation or experimental fitting, and the crack depth is evaluated by the interpolation method measured by the experiment SBx. When the crack length L < 30 mm, the sensitivity SBx and the crack depth interpolation formula of a specific length (such as 10, 20 mm, etc.) crack are obtained by simulation or experimental fitting, and the crack depth is evaluated by selecting the approximate length fitting formula measured by the experiment SBx. The two-step interpolation method can quickly obtain crack length and depth information, does not require a large amount of sample data, and is conducive to the online real-time evaluation of crack size.
The crack length, depth and characteristic signal rules obtained from the simulation model in this article, and the formulas (2)–(4) obtained from polynomial interpolation, where formula (2) is the first step to obtain the crack length L, formula (3) is the second step to obtain the crack depth D30 greater than 30 mm in length, and formula (4) is the second step to obtain the crack depth D20 of 20 mm in length.
4 Establishment of the Experimental System
The underwater ACFM detection system consists of an underwater probe, a hull, and an above-water computer. The probe is connected to the hull through a water-sealed joint, and the hull is connected to the above-water computer through an optical fiber, as shown in Fig. 6a. The internal lithium battery of the hull powers the entire system. The excitation module generates a sinusoidal excitation signal with a frequency of 2000 Hz and an amplitude of 10 V and loads it into the excitation coil in the probe. The excitation coil induces a uniform current field on the surface of the test piece. When a defect is present, the induced current is disturbed, causing spatial magnetic field distortion. The magnetic field sensor inside the probe measures the distorted magnetic field and transmits it to the amplification module inside the hull through the primary amplification filter circuit [21, 22]. After the signal is amplified, it is transmitted to the acquisition card, transmitted to the processor after A/D conversion, and transmitted to the surface through the optical fiber. The optical fiber receiver on the surface converts the optical signal into an electrical signal and transmits it to the computer. The internal program of the computer analyzes and evaluates the crack size in real time. The developed underwater ACFM system is shown in Fig. 6b.
5 Crack Evaluation Test
The probe and hull are placed in a water tank filled with seawater medium. The probe is driven by a mechanical arm to scan the crack area of the test block at a uniform speed of 40 mm/s, as shown in Fig. 7a. Two test blocks are set up in this test, both of which are made of Q235 material. Test block 1 has rectangular groove cracks of the same depth (4 mm), with a crack opening of 0.5 mm and crack lengths of 20, 40, and 45 mm respectively, as shown in Fig. 7b. Test block 2 has cracks of different cross-sectional shapes, with a crack opening of 0.5 mm. Crack 1# is a semi-elliptical crack with a length of 20 mm and a maximum defect depth of 4 mm; Crack 2# has a semi-elliptical defect with a length of 30 mm and a maximum defect depth of 5 mm; Crack 3# has a complex shape with a surface opening length of 40 mm and a maximum defect depth of 4 mm, as shown in Fig. 7c.
5.1 Crack Size Evaluation
The probe is driven by the mechanical arm to uniformly detect Test Block 1. The detection results of the sensitivity SBx of the characteristic signal Bx are shown in Fig. 8a, and the detection results of the characteristic signal Bz are shown in Fig. 8b.
From Bz, the peak-to-valley distances PBz can be obtained as 18.0, 37.5, and 42.0 mm, respectively. Using formula (2) for interpolation, the crack length sizes are obtained as 19.4, 39.3, and 43.9 mm. For cracks with lengths of 39.3 and 43.9 mm, the crack depths are calculated using formula (3) to be 3.7 and 3.8 mm, respectively, with errors of 7.5 and 5.0%, respectively, achieving high evaluation accuracy.
For cracks with a length less than 30 mm, the approximate formula (4) is used to evaluate the crack with a length of 19.4 mm, and the estimated crack depth is 3.8 mm, with an error of 7.5%. If formula (3) is used directly to estimate the crack depth, the crack depth is obtained as 7.2 mm, which is much larger than the actual size of the crack. It can be seen that the two-step interpolation algorithm can improve the evaluation accuracy of the crack depth for cracks with a length less than 30 mm. The results of the evaluation of the length and depth of the crack using the two-step interpolation algorithm are shown in Table 3. In summary, the two-step interpolation algorithm can achieve high-precision evaluation of crack length and depth, with a maximum depth error of 7.5% and a maximum length error of 3.0%.
5.2 Crack Profile Evaluation
The probe uniformly detects Test Block 2, and the sensitivity SBx of the characteristic signal Bx is obtained by formula (1), and the part greater than the background magnetic field (the signal above the profile is removed), as shown in Fig. 9a.
In order to achieve crack profile reconstruction and evaluation, this paper proposes a crack profile reconstruction algorithm based on the segmentation interpolation of the characteristic signal Bx. First, use the peak-to-valley distance PBz of the characteristic signal Bz in Fig. 9b and formula (2) to revise the crack length, and obtain the lengths of the three cracks as 19.4, 29.6, and 38.8 mm. Secondly, using the segmentation interpolation method, Crack 2# is used as the calibration crack, which is divided into 15 equal parts in the length direction to form 15 crack depth points. At the same time, the sensitivity SBx of the characteristic signal of Crack 2# is set to 15 equal parts in the crack area to form the sensitivity of 15 position points. Then, the corresponding relationship between the depth of any position of the crack and the sensitivity SBx can be obtained, as shown in Fig. 9c. The relationship between crack depth D and sensitivity SBx can be expressed by the polynomial interpolation formula as follows:
Finally, the sensitivity SBx of Crack 1# is divided into 10 equal parts along the length direction to obtain the sensitivity of 10 position points. The sensitivity SBx of Crack 3# is divided into 20 equal parts along the length direction to obtain the sensitivity of 20 position points. Using formula (5), the crack depth corresponding to the sensitivity of each position point can be obtained, and the crack profile contour can be reconstructed, as shown in Fig. 10.
The vertical coordinate 0 position in Fig. 10a and c represents the upper surface of the test block, and the negative value represents the depth below the surface of the test block. Figure 10b and d show the visualized shape of the crack profile, which matches the defect profile height in Test Block 2. The actual profile area of Crack 1# is 60.76 mm2, and the area of the closed area that can be evaluated by the curve is 57.28 mm2, with an error of 5.7%; the actual profile area of Crack 3# is 118.94 mm2, and the evaluation result is 116.13 mm2, with an error of 2.4%, achieving high reconstruction accuracy. The above shows that the segmentation interpolation algorithm based on the characteristic signal Bx can achieve high-precision reconstruction and visual display of the crack profile.
6 Conclusion
This paper establishes a three-dimensional finite element simulation model of ACFM in a seawater environment, analyzes in detail the influence of crack length and depth on characteristic signals, proposes a two-step interpolation crack size evaluation algorithm and a segmentation interpolation crack profile reconstruction algorithm, builds an underwater ACFM testing system, and carries out crack detection and evaluation experiments. The main conclusions are as follows:
-
(1)
The distance between the peaks and valleys of the characteristic signal Bz is related to the crack length and is not affected by the crack depth; the depth of the characteristic signal Bx valley is mainly related to the crack depth, but is also affected by the crack length.
-
(2)
When the crack is larger than 30 mm, the crack length does not affect the depth of the characteristic signal Bx valley; when the crack is less than 30 mm, the crack length has a greater impact on the characteristic signal Bx valley.
-
(3)
The two-step interpolation crack size evaluation algorithm based on the characteristic signals Bx and Bz can achieve high-precision evaluation of crack length and depth, with a maximum error of 3.0% for length evaluation and a maximum error of 7.5% for depth evaluation.
-
(4)
The segmentation interpolation profile reconstruction algorithm based on the characteristic signal Bx can achieve high-precision reconstruction and visual display of the crack profile, with a maximum reconstruction error of 5.7%.
References
M.P. Papaelias, M.C. Lugg, C. Roberts et al., High-speed inspection of rails using ACFM techniques. NDTE Int. 42, 328–335 (2009)
W. Li, X. Yuan, G. Chen et al., High sensitivity rotating alternating current field measurement for arbitrary-angle underwater cracks. NDTE Int. 79, 123–131 (2016)
J. Leng, H. Tian, G. Zhou et al., Joint detection of MMM and ACFM on critical parts of jack-up offshore platform. Ocean Eng. 35, 34–38 (2017)
A. Akbari-Khezri, S.H.H. Sadeghi et al., An efficient modeling technique for analysis of AC field measurement probe output signals to improve crack detection and sizing in cylindrical metallic structures. J. Nondestruct. Evaluat. 35, 9 (2016)
J.L. Shen, L. Zhou, H. Rowshandel, G.L. Nicholson, C.L. Davis, Determining the propagation angle for non-vertical surface-breaking cracks and its effect on crack sizing using an ACFM sensor. Measur. Sci. Technol. 26, 115604 (2015)
Z. Zhou, J. Zhang, C. Gu, Simulation research on crack defect identification based on alternating current electromagnetic field. J. Saf. Sci. Technol. 14(12), 146–151 (2018)
X. Yuan, W. Li, G. Chen et al., Two-step interpolation algorithm for measurement of longitudinal cracks on pipe strings using circumferential current field testing system. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 14, 394–402 (2017)
A.M. Lewis, D.H. Michael, M.C. Lugg et al., Thin-skin electromagnetic fields around surface-breaking cracks in metals. J. Appl. Phys. 64(8), 3777–3784 (1988)
W.D. Dover, R. Collins, D.H. Michael et al., The use of AC-field measurements for crack detection and sizing in air and underwater [and discussion]. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 320(1554), 271–283 (1986)
S. Hu, Research on Detection and Inversion of Cracks Using the Alternating Current Field Measurement Technique (Tianjin University, Tianjin, 2004)
A.L. Ribeiro, H.G. Ramos, O. Postolache, A simple forward direct problem solver for eddy current non-destructive inspection of aluminum plates using uniform field probes. Measurement 45, 213–217 (2012)
H. Rowshandel, G.L. Nicholson, J.L. Shen et al., Characterisation of clustered cracks using an ACFM sensor and application of an artificial neural network. NDTE Int. 98, 80–88 (2018)
G.L. Nicholson, C.L. Davis, Modelling of the response of an ACFM sensor to rail and rail wheel RCF cracks. NDTE Int. 46, 107–114 (2012)
R.K. Amineh, M. Ravan, S.H.H. Sadeghi et al., Using AC field measurement data at an arbitrary liftoff distance to size long surface-breaking cracks in ferrous metals. NDTE Int. 41, 169–177 (2008)
D. Katoozian, R.P.R. Hasanzadeh, A fuzzy error characterization approach for crack depth profile estimation in metallic structures through ACFM data. IEEE Trans. Magnet. 53, 6202110 (2017)
W. Li, G. Chen, X. Zheng, Crack sizing for alternating current field measurement based on GRNN. J. China Univ. Petrol. 31(2), 105–109 (2007)
W. Li, X. Yuan, M. Qu et al., Research on real-time and high-precision cracks inversion algorithm for ACFM based on GA-BP neural network. J. China Univ. Petrol. 40(5), 128–134 (2016)
A. Noroozi, R.P.R. Hasanzadeh, M. Ravan, A fuzzy learning approach for identification of arbitrary crack profiles using ACFM technique. IEEE Trans. Magnet. 49(9), 5016–5027 (2013)
X. Yuan, W. Li, G.M. Chen et al., Inspection of both inner and outer cracks in aluminum tubes using double frequency circumferential current field testing method. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 127, 16–34 (2019)
G.L. Nicholson, A.G. Kostryzhev, X.J. Hao et al., Modelling and experimental measurements of idealised and light-moderate RCF cracks in rails using an ACFM sensor. NDTE Int. 44, 427–437 (2011)
X. Yuan, W. Li, G.M. Chen et al., Circumferential current field testing system with TMR sensor array for non-contact detection and estimation of cracks on power plant piping. Sens. Actuat. A 263, 542–553 (2017)
X. Yuan, W. Li, G.M. Chen et al., Bobbin coil probe with sensor arrays for imaging and evaluation of longitudinal cracks inside aluminum tubes. IEEE Sens. J. 18, 6774–6781 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yuan, X., Li, W., Zhao, J., Yin, X., Li, X., Zhao, J. (2024). Research on High-Precision Evaluation of Crack Dimensions and Profiles Methods for Underwater Structure Based on ACFM Technique. In: Recent Development of Alternating Current Field Measurement Combine with New Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4224-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4224-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-97-4223-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-97-4224-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)