Abstract
Construction on weak expansive soils is challenging due to their low bearing capacity and high-volume susceptibility under moisture fluctuation. The uplift pressure from expansive clay can induce significant swelling pressure on foundations, but on the other hand, shrinkage of clay can result in substantial foundation settlement during dry seasons. This differential movement of the foundation can distress the superstructure of a building, resulting in serviceable and ultimate limit state failures. The current approach to dealing with foundations in expansive clay soils is to construct a rigid slab that can withstand the anticipated movement or a pier-type approach using engineering design principles or a normal-type slab based on the fill being placed under controlled conditions. We introduce a capping layer under the foundation to control moisture fluctuation and increase the bearing capacity of the foundation using a recycled glass-based stabilization approach. A prototype foundation was constructed in the laboratory using an optimum stabilization mix design that was derived using glass and other sustainable additives. Slab movements and soil conditions were monitored over a 6 month period under simulated dry/wetting moisture fluctuations and operational loads. Results revealed that the performance of the foundation under controlled conditions was outperformed by the capping layered foundation during service loadings including seasonal moisture fluctuation. The outcomes from this research will have a significant impact on improving foundation performance in expansive soils, as well as proposing a sustainable foundation construction process using recycled glass waste.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Keywords
1 Introduction
Expansive soils are a significant hazard for lightweight building foundations and highway pavements, because they experience changes in volume due to seasonal moisture fluctuation, swelling during wet seasons and shrinking during dry periods. If a pavement rests on expansive soil, longitudinal surface cracks may occur because of the seasonal volume change of the subgrade expansive soil [1]. Infrastructure damage due to expansive soils is commonly reported in many countries, such as Australia, Canada, England, China, India, and the USAs. Consequently, the need for change in conventional foundation construction systems is becoming a very important requirement to construct more sustainable houses and buildings with low maintenance costs over their lifetime.
Soil stabilization is an effective way to enhance the durability, mechanical characteristics and to reduce or eliminate the amount of volume change in expansive soils. Using lime and cement for soil stabilization are less cost effective and not environmentally friendly strategies due to the use of energy, resources and carbon footprint produced during the manufacturing process. Moreover, investigations revealed that cyclic wetting and drying cause arresting volume change behavior to be lost after the first wet–dry cycle, and consequently swelling potential increases after each cycle due to the formation of expansive material such as ettringite in calcium-based stabilized soils [2].
Much attention has been given to reducing the utilization of natural resources in cement and other traditional construction materials. For example, the construction sector generated roughly 92.5 million tonnes of asphalt concrete and 4.6 million tons of cement in 2013 and 2015, respectively [3, 4], necessitating alternative construction materials to minimize environmental impact and to preserve natural resources. Hence, the main goal of research by both scientists and engineers has been reducing the demand for natural resources as well as to minimizing the disposal of wastes such as glass [5,6,7]. Significant research has been performed into the use of waste glass in construction. For example, cullet has been tested as aggregate in the construction sector ranging from concrete and cementitious materials to roadway and asphalt construction. In addition, waste glass can be utilized in the manufacture of ceramic-based products [8].
The mechanical behavior of clay soils can be significantly improved by adding glass powder to the raw soil [9]. Adding fly ash and cement together with recycled glass powder increases the shear strength and CBR of soil [10,11,12]. Individually, glass powder can increase the strength of cement-stabilized expansive soil and decrease the plasticity index of the soil mixture. Furthermore, the addition of glass powder increases dry density, CBR and UCS with a reduction in optimum moisture content [13]. However, the effect of crushed glass on soaked CBR can be less pronounced compared with unsoaked conditions. In terms of other additives, Phanikumar showed that the addition of fly ash to expansive soils can modify the pore orientation of the soil while significantly improving its compaction behavior [14].
Previous studies identified the optimum mix design using waste glass and secondary additives, proposing specifications for a novel capping layer that can be applied to minimize the impact of soft subgrades on foundations [15]. A series of mechanical tests (UCS, standard compaction test and direct shear test), hydraulic conductivity test (permeability) and microscopy test (X-ray diffraction, scanning electron and porosity test) were carried out to explore the optimum combination of glass wastes and secondary additives for field trials in expansive soils.
The aim of current study is to evaluate the performance of a capping layer by applying it in large-scale tests as verification of the proposed novel capping layered foundation for buildings and roads. A laboratory experiment was carried out to investigate the performance of a foundation slab placed on an expansive soil. The proposed capping layer was placed between the foundation and weak subgrade clays to evaluate the foundation’s performance under environmental and operational loads. Performance of the foundation and soil conditions were carefully monitored across a period of time under operational loads for verification of the proposed capping layered foundation system.
2 Methods
2.1 Materials
2.1.1 Soil Characteristics
Soil was obtained from a land excavation site in Melbourne, Australia. The soil was categorized as fine-grained (CL) [16] with a high degree of expansion. All the physical properties of the soil are shown in Figs. 1, 2 and Table 1.
2.1.2 Crushed Recycled Glass Powder
Crushed glass behaves like natural rock and is totally inert and non-biodegradable. Glass powder (GP) was used in this study. Particle size distribution and samples are shown in Figs. 3 and 4 respectively.
2.1.3 Fly Ash
Class F fly ash from a local supplier was the primary additive used in the capping layer. For all types of fly ash, the particle size distribution is similar to that of silt (Fig. 5). Typical physical and mechanical properties for fly ash are shown in Table 2. Other characteristics of the fly ash including chemical composition can be found in Karami et al. [17].
2.1.4 Lime
Hydrated lime, which is the most concentrated form of lime, was used as a secondary additive. Lime decreases the liquid limit of soil mixtures, resulting a reduction in plasticity index. Typical physical and engineering properties of hydrated lime are similar to what was used in this study are shown in Table 3.
2.2 Experimental Set-Up
2.2.1 Stage 1: Control Test
Preparation of the soil required an extremely thorough and careful process to obtain as homogeneous material as possible. In preparation for the test, the natural soil was first sequentially sieved with a 25 mm sieve. A large-scale soil box (L: 1900 mm, W: 750 mm, H: 1000 mm) was built to enable the control of hydraulic and mechanical processes of the soil by changing the water table in the soil. A drain pipe and a valve system were installed at the bottom of the box (i.e., at a depth of 1000 mm) to allow drainage and to control the water table inside the box. Sieved soil was mixed with water in a concrete mixer until a homogenous mixture with optimum moisture content was obtained. The soil was then placed in the test box in 4 layers and compacted in 100 mm rises (Table 4). Figure 6 shows the details of the test box setup. A geotextile sheet was placed over the bottom surface of the box, a 100 mm thick drainage layer made of gravel was placed on top and finally a filter paper before the soil. The top soil surface at the top was left exposed to atmospheric conditions to facilitate evaporation and infiltration. The experiment began late December 2022 during the summer, and continued for 6 months.
As shown in Fig. 6 and Table 5, six moisture probes and three digital movement sensors were installed in different locations. Two temperature/humidity sensors were also installed in the test box to record both the soil and room temperatures. Data were recorded in the controller at a frequency of 1 h and transferred to a computer daily. In addition, weekly manual readings of the movement were taken. A sprinkler system was constructed above the sandbox to simulate rain events similar to field conditions. Water spray was based on the water table depth at specific times and amounts. Water percentage was obtained from the swelling test results for raw soil according to Australian Standard (AS 1289.7.1.1-2003). The amount of water was calculated based on the raw soil amount in the box (Table 7).
For Stage 1, a concrete slab scaled down to L: 750 mm, W: 550 mm, and H: 100 mm was placed on top of the compacted soil to apply the dead loads during the test period. The size of the concrete block was scaled down from an actual designed slab for a residential building following AS 2780. In this test, the dead load was added to the slab for increasing the thickness of the slab from 100 to 170 mm for a residential-purpose building. The live load was applied to the soil by specific weights at the end of wetting and drying periods. The standard load amounts and the calculated applied load based on the slab area are shown in the Table 6.
2.2.2 Stage 2: Test with Capping Layer
In Stage 2, all steps in Stage 1 were repeated, but a capping layer was constructed on top of the raw soil (Fig. 6c). The design mix of the capping layer was based on previous studies [15]. Materials were mixed with soil in percentages of 25% WG powder, 7.5% fly ash and 3% lime by weight compared with raw soil. To prepare the stabilized soil, all ingredients were mixed properly in the dry state in a mechanical mixer. Water was added to the mixture up to the optimum moisture content according to the Standard Compaction test and well mixed. Similar to Stage 1, the soil (subgrade soil) was uniformly compacted in the box. The size of the installed capping layer was same as the raw soil in length and width to cover the whole soil surface area. Thus, the size of the capping layer was L: 1900 mm, W: 750 mm, and H: 100 mm.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Slab Settlement
At the beginning of both stages of the prototype test, the slab started settling down for the first few days after it was placed on the soil surface, due to the weight of both the slab and the capping layer on the raw soil, which caused a secondary compaction process during those first few days. The results show that settlement in Stage 2 was greater than in Stage 1 at early stages. The maximum settlement in Stage 1 was 0.06 mm and for Stage 2, it was 0.10 mm after week 1 for the control and stabilized capping layer tests respectively (Fig. 7). The larger settlement in Stage 2 resulted from elastic compression of the capping layer, which consisted of coarser materials than raw soil. However, this increment in initial settlement was negligible and did not imply a reduction in bearing capacity.
It is important to note that the subsequent slab movement due to swelling was reduced when the capping layer was introduced. The difference in maximum slab movement between the two stages was 0.2 mm. More importantly, the rate of increase in slab movement was less with the capping layer in place. In the control test, slab movement reached 0.4 mm in less than 5 weeks, whereas it took nearly 9 weeks to move by the same amount under stabilized conditions. Therefore, it can be concluded that the capping layer was effective in mitigating the magnitude and the rate of the vertical slab movement.
3.2 Expansive Soil Movement (Swelling)
The soil started swelling and increasing in volume as expected for any expansive soil. During the wetting period, the soil in the control test swelled by 0.6 mm on average (maximum 0.72 mm for individual gauges). In Stage 2, with the capping layer in place, the slab moved by only 0.397 mm (maximum 0.61 mm for individual gauges) (Fig. 7a–c). As shown in Fig. 7, the swelling in Stage 2 of the test with the stabilized capping layer was lower than with the control soil during the wetting period.
Because the capping layer was more permeable than the control soil, it assisted water to drain away faster and remove it from the slab and the expansive soil underneath. Moreover, the load applied to the soil from the weight of the capping layer helped to arrest or reduce the swelling of the expansive soil.
3.3 Moisture Distribution
Water was sprayed on top of the soil with the same pattern (time, amount, and size of spray nozzle) for both stages of the test. As shown in Fig. 7a, the capping layer tended to be mostly dryer than the raw soil in the control test, because of the higher permeability of the capping layer (Fig. 8). In the control test, water pooled on the surface or remained at a shallow depth (based on visual observations) after a wetting event whereas more water infiltrated the soil through the capping layer in Stage 2.
This was evident from the moisture variation at 200 mm from the surface (Fig. 7b). Moisture content at the raw soil-capping layer interface was higher than the moisture content recorded at 200 mm within the raw soil in the control test (Fig. 9). This was due to the rapid flow of water through the capping layer. However, the capping layer was effective in delaying water reaching the raw soil layer. Without the capping layer, the moisture content at the surface of raw soil was >30% in less than 3 weeks. When the capping layer was in place, it took almost 5 weeks for the water content at the top of the raw soil layer (interface between the raw soil and capping layer) to reach >30%. Consequently, the raw soil layer remained drier for a longer period, which will reduce the vertical movement of the slab.
The moisture variation shown in Fig. 7c corresponded to the condition at the base of the control test and at 400 mm depth below the surface for Stage 2. Interestingly, the difference in moisture content at these locations was narrow, indicating the raw soil layer remained drier in Stage 2 throughout the wetting period. Thus, it was evident that the capping layer kept the water away from the expansive soil underneath.
4 Conclusions
This research investigated a novel sustainable foundation system that could mitigate the adverse influence of expansive soil conditions for construction. The proposed approach is based on a capping layer constructed from recycled glass waste and other sustainable additives and placed directly above the existing expansive soil. A prototype foundation was constructed in the laboratory using an optimum stabilization mix design derived from a detailed investigation of mechanical and hydraulic characteristics. The slab movement and soil conditions were monitored over 6 months under simulated dry/wet moisture fluctuations and operational loads. Results showed that the foundation’s performance on the novel capping layer was significantly productive compared with control conditions. The higher efficiency of the new capping layer system was evidenced by 35% reduction in slab displacement during wet season simulation, which is a significant improvement in foundation serviceability on expansive soils. The outcome from this research will have a significant impact on minimizing infrastructure maintenance costs, which are a heavy burden for asset managers in any country. The proposed capping layer, which incorporates waste materials (32.5% of total), is a waste management strategy that minimizes the serviceability concerns of civil infrastructure while introducing a value-added benefit for waste materials. It is to be noted that the results provided in this document are based on the referred tests/materials conditions and should not be used in field applications without appropriate verification.
References
Khan MA, Wang JX, Sarker D (2020) development of analytic method for computing expansive soil-induced stresses in highway pavement. Int J Geomech 20:04019160
Al-Rawas AA, Hago A, Al-Sarmi H (2005) Effect of lime, cement and Sarooj (artificial pozzolan) on the swelling potential of an expansive soil from Oman. Build Environ 40:681–687
Du H, Tan KH (2017) Properties of high volume glass powder concrete. Cem Concr Compos 75:22–29
Adaway M, Wang Y (2015) Recycled glass as a partial replacement for fine aggregate in structural concrete—effects on compressive strength. Electron J Struct Eng 14:116–122
Mohajerani A, Tanriverdi Y, Nguyen BT, Wong KK, Dissanayake HN, Johnson L, Whitfield D, Thomson G, Alqattan E, Rezaei A (2017) Physico-mechanical properties of asphalt concrete incorporated with encapsulated cigarette butts. Constr Build Mater 153:69–80
Mohajerani A, Vajna J, Cheung THH, Kurmus H, Arulrajah A, Horpibulsuk S (2017) Practical recycling applications of crushed waste glass in construction materials: a review. Constr Build Mater 156:443–467
Ukwatta A, Mohajerani A, Eshtiaghi N, Setunge S (2016) Variation in physical and mechanical properties of fired-clay bricks incorporating ETP biosolids. J Clean Prod 119:76–85
Majdinasab A, Yuan Q (2019) Post-consumer cullet and potential engineering applications in North America. Resour Conserv Recycl 147:1–9
Bilondi MP, Toufigh MM, Toufigh V (2018) Experimental investigation of using a recycled glass powder-based geopolymer to improve the mechanical behavior of clay soils. Constr Build Mater 170:302–313
Turgut P (2013) Fly ash block containing limestone and glass powder wastes. KSCE J Civ Eng 17:1425–1431
Baldovino JDJA, Izzo RLDS, Silva ÉRD, Rose JL (2020) Sustainable use of recycled-glass powder in soil stabilization. J Mater Civ Eng 32:04020080
Olufowobi J, Ogundoju A, Michael B, Aderinlewo O (2014) Clay soil stabilisation using powdered glass. J Eng Sci Technol 9:541–558
Ikara I, Kundiri A, Mohammed A (2015) Effects of waste glass (WG) on the strength characteristics of cement stabilized expansive soil. Am J Eng Res (AJER) 4:33–41
Phanikumar RSS (2007) Volume change behavior of fly ash-stabilized clays. Mater Civ Eng 19:8
Karami H, Sidiq A, Costa S, Robert D, Li J., Setunge S (2022). Hydro-mechanical and microstructural properties of an expansive soil stabilized with waste glass and other additives. Under Review
ASTM-D2487 (2017) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system), vol 17e1. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
Karami H, Pooni J, Robert D, Costa S, Li J, Setunge S (2021) Use of secondary additives in fly ash based soil stabilization for soft subgrades. Transp Geotech 100585
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the RMIT postgraduate scholarship and the Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Research Hub (grant no. IH150100006, IH200100010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Karami, H., Robert, D., Costa, S., Li, J., Setunge, S., Venkatesan, S. (2023). Recycled Glass-Based Capping Layer for Foundations in Expansive Soils. In: Duan, W., Zhang, L., Shah, S.P. (eds) Nanotechnology in Construction for Circular Economy. NICOM 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 356. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3330-3_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3330-3_44
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-3329-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-3330-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)