Abstract
3D printed ultra-high performance concrete (3DP-UHPC) plays an important role in the realization of ultra-high compressive and tensile strengths. Considering the particular characteristics of UHPC, the conversion of UHPC to 3DP-UHPC is a complex phenomenon and has been the subject of numerous studies. It is very important to be able to design a thixotropic structure in the early hydration stage for bridging the gap between the slow setting of UHPC and the rapid setting of the 3D printing procedure. In the design and application of 3DP-UHPC, requirements such as the ratio of coagulant and flocculant, fiber alignment, reinforced 3D printed no-rebar reinforced concrete, safety, cost etc. need to be taken into account. We present a comprehensive review of 3DP-UHPC in concrete construction from preparation to application, including design method, raw materials, mechanical, reinforced methods, and applications. Finally, recommendations are provided to promote the application of 3DP-UHPC in engineering practice.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Keywords
1 Introduction
The rapid development of 3D concrete printing (3DCP) has the potential to greatly reduce labor demand, improve sustainability, reduce construction costs, and effectively overcome the dilemma faced by traditional construction methods [1,2,3,4]. In recent years, substantial achievements have been made by 3DCP in the field of architecture and civil engineering. One of the challenges is that conventional steel bar reinforcement cannot be directly integrated into the printed concrete. Researchers and engineers have tried different reinforcement methods by applying continuous fiber, shut fiber, microcable, mesh and U-nails etc., to improve the brittleness of 3D printed concrete [5,6,7,8]. Fiber reinforcement is widely applied for printed concrete due to its effectiveness and ease of operation. Small-sized fibers show less interference with the flexible extrusion characteristics of 3D printing. More importantly, the mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced concrete can meet the structural requirements, such as compressive strength and tensile strain exceeding 100 MPa and 4%, respectively [9, 10]. Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC), as a type of fiber-reinforced concrete, can meet these structural requirements [11, 12] and is currently mainly being used for new structures, reinforcement, and repair of existing infrastructure [13, 14].
The development of 3D printed UHPC (3DP-UHPC) will greatly drive the application of 3D printing technology to structural engineering. UHPC is considered a combination of self-compacting concrete, high-performance concrete, and fiber-reinforced concrete [15]. The good construction performance of UHPC is strong related to the casting procedure, but this advantage is difficult to match with the 3D printing construction of layer by layer stacking. Current research has eliminated the gap between cast and 3D printed UHPC in construction by adding viscosity-modifying admixtures (VMA), such as nano-clay, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), etc. [16,17,18,19,20]. Similar to traditional UHPC, 3DP-UHPC will be widely used in new and existing structures. For example, the construction of a curvilinear bench with free form and light structure [16]. In addition, more attention is being paid to the dynamic performance. Zhou et al. [20] discussed the performance of 3DP-UHPC based on projectile and explosive impacts tests. Yang et al. [21] carried out split-Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests and analyzed the strain rate effect of 3DP-UHPC
3DP-UHPC has attracted much attention because of its excellent mechanical properties and ongoing research mainly focuses on the preparation of materials, static, and dynamic mechanical properties, and so on. Given the complexity of the preparation method of 3DP-UHPC and the unknowns of the problems that may be faced in its applications, we systematically reviewed the latest research progress on 3DP-UHPC. Finally, some suggestions are put forward to promote the development of 3DP-UHPC based on the current challenges.
2 Preparation of 3DP-UHPC
2.1 Design of UHPC for 3DCP
The gap between the printing and casting procedures of UHPC mainly depend on rheological properties. 3D printed concrete is a typical yield stress material; that is, its yield stress first increases and then decreases with increasing shear rate, and finally maintains at a certain yield stress platform, as shown in Fig. 1a. The cast UHPC is self-leveling in the static state because its yield stress makes it difficult to maintain its shape. Moreover, cast UHPC is a shear thickening fluid; that is, its yield stress increases rapidly with increasing shear rate, as shown in Fig. 1a. On the other hand, shear thickening fluid means that the shear rate needs to be continuously increased to overcome the yield stress of UHPC. UHPC strips will be narrowed or even interrupted when the yield stress exceeds the maximum shear stress provided by the 3D printer.
The methods for modifying UHPC to achieve printability are the chemical hydration accelerated hardening method [20] (CM) and the physical flocculation method (PM) [16, 17]. The CM matches the hydration rate of UHPC with the printing rate by adding materials that change the cement hydration rate. For example, three levels of fast, medium, and slow hydration rates of UHPC can be represented by the curves ①–③ in Fig. 1b. These different rates can be achieved by reducing the accelerator dosage, such as sulfoaluminate cement. The curves ①–③ can match the printing rate of slow, medium, and fast, respectively. However, the matching gap between the hydration rate and printing rate of UHPC usually leads to a short open time of CM. It is easy to cause large deformation and rough surface dry cracking or even collapse and fracture due to insufficient hydration and too rapid printing. PM matches the printing rate by adding VMAs, such as silica fume (SF), nano-clay, and HPMC, to make thixotropic structures in the UHPC before hydration structure formation. For example, based on curves ①–③ in Fig. 1b, the addition of the same VMA gets curves ④–⑥. The addition of VMA makes the material printable earlier. The thixotropic structure will produce obvious deformation when the accumulated weight of the UHPC exceeds its yield stress, affecting the forming accuracy and even causing collapse. Therefore, PM is limited to a certain range of printing rates to allow the hydration rate to follow up.
The potential third printability control method, namely the framing effect provided by raw materials, needs attention because of the current development trend of mixing large-size aggregate into UHPC and the existence of steel fibers. In our previous study on the printability of large-size aggregate, we found that construction deformation and strength were derived from the bonding force of cementitious materials and the aggregate biting force [4], as shown in Fig. 1c. Therefore, the contribution of the framing effect to the improvement of yield stress cannot be ignored.
Designing UHPC for 3DCP will be based on the above principles. Specifically, the purpose of the preparations is to improve the early yield strength of UHPC, reduce its fluidity and improve its shape retention ability by adding a regulator or VMA alone or adding both. Limited by the lack of quantitative preparation theory, the specific dosage can only be obtained by testing. It should be noted that determination of these doses is significantly related to the printing equipment and the selected printing process, which reduces the repeatability of the material mix to a certain extent.
2.2 Manufacturing of 3DP-UHPC
Table 1 lists the raw materials and mix proportions of 3DP-UHPC in the existing literature. Zhou et al. [20] also adopted CM to promote the hydration rate to achieve matching with the printing process, specifically by adding slag. Arunothayan et al. [16, 17] used PM to achieve printability of UHPC, by adding HPMC and nano-clay. It cannot be ignored that the proportion of SF is relatively large, accounting for ≈30% of the cementitious materials. Excessive SF also contributed to the printability of UHPC. To avoid the defects of the short open time of CM and the low unit construction rate of PM, our group proposed a method of combining CM and PM to achieve printable UHPC[19]. Specifically, sulfoaluminate cement was used to replace the 10% mass fraction of Portland cement to accelerate the hydration rate to preliminarily match the printing rate. Then, the thixotropic material Nano clay and HPMC were added to supplement the insufficient yield stress of UHPC to realize the continuous and stable printing. Here, the mass ratio of the accelerator composed of sulfoaluminate to the flocculant composed of nano-clay and HPMC was ≈11:1. The mix proportions of Yang et al. [18] are the most popularized, because the raw material composition does not different from the cast UHPC base except for the addition of an appropriate amount of nano-calcium carbonate, and its mechanical properties are also the highest, which may be related to the use of a water reducing agent.
The microstructure of UHPC mixed with sulfoaluminate cement, sulfoaluminate cement and VMA was observed by scanning electron microscopy. The preparation time of the two samples was between the initial and final setting. Figure 2 shows the obvious differences in the microstructure of UHPC before and after adding VMA. The microstructure of UHPC without VMA is mainly C-S–H gel with 3D network structures (Fig. 2a); that is, 3DP-UHPC prepared by CM. The microstructure of UHPC doped with sulfoaluminate cement and VMA is mainly flocculent, formed by the adsorption of hydration products by VMA. A similar flocculent microstructure after adsorption was reported by Zhang et al. [23].
2.3 Mechanical Anisotropy of 3DP-UHPC
The compression and flexural properties of 3DP-UHPC in the existing literature were statistically analyzed. The average compressive strength of all 3DP-UHPC samples at 28 days was in the range of 120–160 MPa. The flexural strength of specimens was between 30 and 50 MPa. The printing procedure had\s a favorable effect on the orientation of fibers; that is, the orientation of steel fibers was parallel to the printing direction. Figure 3a, b show computed tomography scans of single or interwoven printed 3DP-UHPC samples. The consistency between fiber orientation and printing direction is obvious. The fiber orientation and stress direction should be designed to be consistent to reach optimal application of UHPC materials [24]. For example, the flexural strength of 3DP-UHPC specimens nearly doubled that of cast UHPC specimens [22], as shown in Fig. 3c. The flexural and tensile properties of 3DP-UHPC will be either ductile or brittle in different directions due to fiber orientation [24]. 3DP-UHPC has obvious mechanical anisotropy and generally has weaker mechanical properties along the interstrip or interlayer directions, as shown in Fig. 3d. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the printing path to fully realize the toughening effect of fiber orientation and achieve the excellent bearing performance of 3DP-UHPC structures [18].
3 Applications of 3DP-UHPC
3.1 Large-Scale Special Components
3DP-UHPC with its ultra-high mechanical properties is expected to alleviate the contradiction that 3D printed concrete structures cannot be directly used in engineering under steel-free reinforcement conditions. Some specially shaped structures with independent bearing capacity have been constructed, although no large-scale application of 3DP-UHPC has been found. There are two construction paths for 3DP-UHPC in new structures; one is the construction using 3DP-UHPC alone, such as a curvilinear bench [16] or hollow column [17], as shown in Fig. 4a, b; another is to use 3DP-UHPC to construct permanent templates, such as the specially shaped columns constructed by our group, shown in Fig. 4c. Attention should be paid to the construction of steel-free reinforcement concrete structures with 3DP-UHPC, namely UHPC-reinforced concrete (URC). This has obvious advantages in maintaining the flexibility of 3D printing and reducing the time and labor consumption of rebar implantation.
3.2 As the Reinforcement Materials
The in-process reinforcing method (IRM) was inspired by reinforced concrete materials under the technical constraints of steel bar implantation. As a type of IRM, the dual 3D printing procedure for URC has proved to be a potential and effective reinforcement method [19]. This is because UHPC and concrete are both cement-based materials, which means that there are advantages in the printing path following and interface bonding performance [25]. The principle of an extrusion system for dual 3D concrete printing is that UHPC and 3DPC are fused at the nozzle to complete synchronous printing, as shown in Fig. 5a. Figure 5b shows the three-direction profile of the sample printed by this technique. It can be seen that the 3DP-UHPC is similar to the rebar arrangement in concrete. Another advantage of this technique is that the concrete wrapping UHPC blocks air and water to protect steel fibers from corrosion. In addition, it can be predicted that this method will maximize the utilization rate of UHPC to achieve structural strengthening and toughening, such as printing along the stress line of the bridge or in the required position based on the results of topological optimization.
3.3 As Protection Against Explosion and Impact
3DP-UHPC application has been extended to anti-explosion and anti-impact structures due to its good energy absorption capacity. The effectiveness of 3DP-UHPC has been demonstrated by experimental studies on explosion resistance and impact resistance. Yang et al. [21] tested the dynamic compression performance of 3DP-UHPC. Zhou et al. [20] explored the unique behavior of 3DP-UHPC subjected to projectile and explosive impacts and revised an empirical formula for calculating the crater depth of 3DPC. The preparation process is shown in Fig. 6(a). Our recent work explored the contact explosion performance of 3DP-UHPC. In that work, 3DP-UHPC with different thicknesses was used to strengthen ordinary concrete. The preparation process is shown in Fig. 6(b). It is worth noting that there is no rebar inside the slabs of the test group. We found that PURN8, the thickness of 3DP-UHPC replacing ordinary concrete was 53.3%, was marginally improved to that of reinforced concrete.
4 Challenges of 3DP-UHPC
Despite the increasing amount of research published thus far on 3DP-UHPC, many challenges and research barriers require further innovative exploration.
4.1 Standardization of Materials
The most fundamental challenge is standardization of 3DP-UHPC. In the preparation process of 3DP-UHPC, our proposed method that combines the CM and PM had qualitative mixing ratio designs based on experience. Following a certain rule of mix ratio design will be more conducive to standardization of 3DP-UHPC and improvement of material properties. The mixing ratio design of 3DP-UHPC has been completed, but regulating the fluidity of UHPC brings a series of challenges to the ultra-high performance of the material, such as mechanical and durability weakening problems due to the density of the material and the bonding performance between the fiber and the matrix. In addition, steel fibers cannot solve the strain-softening behavior after peak stress, and it is difficult to achieve large tensile strains of materials. Exploratory studies have found that mixing steel fibers and polyethylene fibers can effectively improve this problem [10]. Therefore, an integrated 3DP-UHPC mix ratio design method combining comprehensive fluid performance regulation, fiber–matrix interface, and synergistic toughening of multiple fibers can contribute to optimization of material properties, and further research on this material is required, such as durability and mechanical properties under different strain rate conditions, etc.
4.2 Flexible Design of Structures
It is very important to manufacture 3DPC structures considering both safety and economy in structural applications. 3DP-UHPC has good mechanical toughness under different strain rate conditions and will be widely used in the construction of new structures and the reinforcement of existing military and civil buildings. Reinforcing plain concrete where it is needed provides a specific way to achieve the construction of 3DPC structures. 3DP-UHPC is regarded as a disruptive method for construction due to the advantages of 3D printing and its economics. Initial exploration has demonstrated the feasibility of 3DP-UHPC to partially replace or even completely replace steel reinforcement for concrete structures, but its application in larger-scale structures requires refined design, such as combining prestressing methods and topological optimization methods, design, etc. The reinforcement of existing buildings with 3DP-UHPC is also a very important structural application scenario. The coordinated deformation of interfaces of 3DP-UHPC and other materials under different working conditions will require special attention, such as the shrinkage deformation performance and load-deformation performance of the two materials. The structural response of 3DP-UHPC under strain rate loading will also be a very interesting research area.
5 Summary and Outlook
Combined with the reviewed research, we have provided a specific understanding of the research progress of 3DP-UHPC, which will be of significance to promote the application of 3DCP.
-
Integrated material design combining fluid modification, fiber–matrix interface enhancement, and hybrid fiber toughening can be used to improve the mix design of 3DP-UHPC at the theoretical level, such as quantifying the impact of VMAs on the printability of UHPC, improving fiber–matrix cohesion through nanomaterials, and finding critical fiber lengths, etc.
-
Further exploration of the mechanical properties and durability of materials under different strain rates and establish corresponding constitutive models to provide a theoretical basis for structural design.
-
Further exploration of the application of 3DP-UHPC in newly constructed 3DPC structures or the reinforcement of existing buildings and explore the structural response laws under different strain rate loads to realize the safety and economy of 3D printed structures.
References
Ma G, Buswell R, Leal da Silva WR, Wang L, Xu J, Jones SZ (2022) Technology readiness: a global snapshot of 3D concrete printing and the frontiers for development. Cem Concr Res 156:106774
Xiao J, Ji G, Zhang Y, Ma G, Mechtcherine V, Pan J, Wang L, Ding T, Duan Z, Du S (2021) Large-scale 3D printing concrete technology: current status and future opportunities. Cement Concr Compos 122:104115
Wang L, Yang Y, Yao L, Ma G (2022) Interfacial bonding properties of 3D printed permanent formwork with the post-casted concrete. Cement Concr Compos 128:104457
Bai G, Wang L, Ma G, Sanjayan J, Bai M (2021) 3D printing eco-friendly concrete containing under-utilised and waste solids as aggregates. Cement Concr Compos 120:104037
Li VC, Bos FP, Yu K, McGee W, Ng TY, Figueiredo SC, Nefs K, Mechtcherine V, Nerella VN, Pan J, van Zijl GPAG, Kruger PJ (2020) On the emergence of 3D printable engineered, strain hardening cementitious composites (ECC/SHCC). Cem Concr Res 132:106038
Marchment T, Sanjayan J (2020) Mesh reinforcing method for 3D Concrete Printing. Autom Constr 109:102992
Li Z, Ma G, Wang F, Wang L, Sanjayan J (2022) Expansive cementitious materials to improve micro-cable reinforcement bond in 3D concrete printing. Cement Concr Compos 125:104304
Wang L, Ma G, Liu T, Buswell R, Li Z (2021) Interlayer reinforcement of 3D printed concrete by the in-process deposition of U-nails. Cem Concr Res 148:106535
Korniejenko K, Łach M (2020) Geopolymers reinforced by short and long fibres—innovative materials for additive manufacturing. Curr Opin Chem Eng 28:167–172
Wu L-S, Yu Z-H, Zhang C, Bangi T (2022) Design approach, mechanical properties and cost-performance evaluation of ultra-high performance engineered cementitious composite (UHP-ECC): a review. Constr Build Mater 340:127734
Bahmani H, Mostofinejad D (2022) Microstructure of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC)—a review study. J Build Eng 50:104118
Bajaber MA, Hakeem IY (2021) UHPC evolution, development, and utilization in construction: a review. J Market Res 10:1058–1074
Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Hussein HH, Chen G (2020) Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams or slabs using ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC): A state of the art review. Eng Struct 205:110035
Deng Y, Zhang Z, Shi C, Wu Z, Zhang C (2022) Steel fiber–matrix interfacial bond in ultra-high performance concrete: a review. Engineering
Shah HA, Yuan Q, Photwichai N (2022) Use of materials to lower the cost of ultra-high-performance concrete—a review. Constr Build Mater 327:127045
Arunothayan AR, Nematollahi B, Ranade R, Bong SH, Sanjayan J (2020) Development of 3D-printable ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete for digital construction. Constr Build Mater 257:119546
Arunothayan AR, Nematollahi B, Ranade R, Khayat KH, Sanjayan JG (2022) Digital fabrication of eco-friendly ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Cement Concr Compos 125:104281
Yang Y, Wu C, Liu Z, Wang H, Ren Q (2022) Mechanical anisotropy of ultra-high performance fibre-reinforced concrete for 3D printing. Cement Concr Compos 125:104310
Bai G, Wang L, Wang F, Ma G (2021) In-process reinforcing method: dual 3D printing procedure for ultra-high performance concrete reinforced cementitious composites. Mater Lett 304:130594
Zhou J, Lai J, Du L, Wu K, Dong S (2022) Effect of directionally distributed steel fiber on static and dynamic properties of 3D printed cementitious composite. Constr Build Mater 318:125948
Yang Y, Wu C, Liu Z, Li J, Yang T, Jiang X (2022) Characteristics of 3D-printing ultra-high performance fibre-reinforced concrete under impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 164:104205
Bai G, Wang L, Wang F, Cheng X (2021) Investigation of the Printability and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printing UHPC. Materials Reports 35(12):67–73
Zhang T, Wang W, Zhao Y, Bai H, Wen T, Kang S, Song G, Song S, Komarneni S (2021) Removal of heavy metals and dyes by clay-based adsorbents: From natural clays to 1D and 2D nano-composites. Chem Eng J 420:127574
Arunothayan AR, Nematollahi B, Ranade R, Bong SH, Sanjayan JG, Khayat KH (2021) Fiber orientation effects on ultra-high performance concrete formed by 3D printing. Cem Concr Res 143:106384
Bai G, Wang L, Wang F, Ma G (2023) Assessing printing synergism in a dual 3D printing system for ultra-high performance concrete in-process reinforced cementitious composite. Addit Manuf 61:103338
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos 51878241, 52078181 and 52178198), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei (Nos. E2021202039 and E2022202041), and the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (No. 20JCYBJC00710).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bai, G., Chen, G., Li, R., Wang, L., Ma, G. (2023). 3D printed Ultra-High Performance Concrete: Preparation, Application, and Challenges. In: Duan, W., Zhang, L., Shah, S.P. (eds) Nanotechnology in Construction for Circular Economy. NICOM 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 356. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3330-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3330-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-3329-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-3330-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)