Abstract
This paper discusses a number of avenues management scholars could follow to reduce the existing gap between scientific rigor and practical relevance without relativizing the importance of the first goal dimension. Such changes are necessary because many management studies do not fully exploit the possibilities to increase their practical relevance while maintaining scientific rigor. We argue that this rigor-relevance gap is not only the consequence of the currently prevailing institutional context in the scientific system, but that individual scholars can reduce the gap between rigorous and practically relevant research by modifying their research work. Thus, most of our suggestions refer to individual scholars’ research activities and relate to specific steps in the (empirical) research process. Our discussion does not imply that all management studies should be practically oriented; basic research will remain a very important part of management research. However, we believe that not enough management research studies are significantly influenced by practical relevance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrahamson, Eric (1991): Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations, Academy of Management Review, 16 (3): 586–612.
Adler, Nancy J. and Anne-Wil Harzing (2009): When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8 (1): 72–95.
Amabile, Teresa M., Chelley Patterson, Jennifer Mueller, Tom Wojcik, Steven J. Kramer, Paul W. Odomirok, and Mel Marsh (2001): Academic-Practitioner Collaboration in Management Research: A Case of Cross-Profession Collaboration, Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2): 418–431.
Anderson, Neil, Peter Herriot, and Gerald P. Hodgkinson (2001): The Practitioner-Researcher Divide in Industrial, Work, and Organisational (IWO) Psychology: Where Are We Now, and Where Do We Do From Here?, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74 (4): 391–411.
Astley, W. Graham and Raymond F. Zammuto (1992): Organization Science, Managers, and Language Games, Organization Science, 3 (4): 443–460.
Avenier, Marie-José (2010): Shaping a Constructivist View of Organizational Design Science, Organization Studies, 31 (09/10): 1229–1255.
Baldridge, David C., Steven W. Floyd, and Lívia Markóczy (2004): Are Managers From Mars and Academicians From Venus? Toward an Understanding of the Relationship Between Academic Quality and Practical Relevance, Strategic Management Journal, 25 (11): 1063–1074.
Bartlett, Christopher A. and Sumantra Ghoshal (1989): Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
Bartunek, Jean M., Sara L. Rynes, and R. Duane Ireland (2006): What Makes Management Research Interesting, and Why Does It Matter?, Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1): 9–15.
Belfiore, Eleonora and Oliver Bennett (2008): The Social Impact of the Arts: An Intellectual History, Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY.
Benbasat, Izak and Robert W. Zmud (1999): Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance, MIS Quarterly, 23 (1): 3–16.
Berry, William L., Jay E. Klompmaker, Curtis P. McLaughlin, and Terry Hill (1991): Linking Strategy Formulation in Marketing and Operations: Empirical Research, Journal of Operations Management, 10 (3): 294–302.
Bettis, Richard A. (1991): Strategic Management and the Straight-jacket: An Editorial Essay, Organization Science, 2 (3): 315–319.
Beyer, Janice M. and Harrison M. Trice (1982): The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27 (4): 591–622.
Burgelman, Robert A. (1983): A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (2): 223–244.
Burke, Lisa A. and Barbara Rau (2010): The Research-Teaching Gap in Management, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9 (1): 132–143.
Chang, Yi-Ying, Yaping Gong, and Mike W. Peng (2012): Expatriate Knowledge Transfer, Absorptive Capacity, and Subsidiary Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 55 (4): 927–948.
Cheng, Joseph L.C. and William McKinley (1983): Toward an Integration of Organization Research and Practice: A Contingency Study of Bureaucratic Control and Performance in Scientific Settings, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (1): 85–100.
Colquitt, Jason A. and Cindy P. Zapata-Phelan (2007): Trends in Theory Building and Theory Testing: A Five-Decade Study of the Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6): 1281–1303.
Cooper, Harris M. (1982): Scientific Guidelines for Conducting Integrative Research Reviews, Review of Educational Research, 52 (2): 291–302.
Corley, Kevin G. and Dennis A. Gioia (2011): Building Theory About Theory Building: What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?, Academy of Management Review, 36 (1): 12–32.
Creswell, John W. (2009): Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd ed., Sage: Los Angeles, CA et al.
Czinkota, Michael R. and Ilkka A. Ronkainen (2009): Trends and Indications in International Business: Topics for Future Research, Management International Review, 49 (2): 249–265.
Daft, Richard L. and Arie Y. Lewin (1990): Can Organization Studies Begin to Break out of the Normal Science Straithjacket? An Editorial Essay, Organization Science, 1 (1): 1–9.
Daft, Richard L. and Arie Y. Lewin (2008): Rigor and Relevance in Organization Studies: Idea Migration and Academic Journal Evolution, Organization Science, 19 (1): 177–183.
Donaldson, Lex (1985): In Defence of Organization Theory: A Reply to the Critics, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
Donaldson, Lex (1995): American Anti-Management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
Dovidio, John F., Anja Eller, and Miles Hewstone (2011): Improving Intergroup Relations Through Direct, Extended and Other Forms of Indirect Contact, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14 (2): 147–160.
Edström, Anders and Jay R. Galbraith (1977): Transfer of Managers as a Coordination and Control Strategy in Multinational Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 22 (2): 248–263.
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989): Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532–550.
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. and Melissa E. Graebner (2007): Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 25–32.
Ford, Eric W., W. Jack Duncan, Arthur G. Bedeian, Peter M. Ginter, Matthew D. Rousculp, and Alice M. Adams (2005): Mitigating Risks, Visible Hands, Inevitable Disasters, and Soft Variables: Management Research That Matters to Managers, Academy of Management Executive, 19 (4): 24–38.
Frey, Bruno S. (2007): Evaluierungen, Evaluierungen … Evaluitis, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 8 (3): 207–220.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1975): Truth and Method, Seabury Press: New York, NY.
Gardner, Heidi K., Francesca Gino, and Bradley R. Staats (2012): Dynamically Integrating Knowledge in Teams: Transforming Resources into Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 55 (4): 998–1022.
Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow (1994): The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage: London et al.
Gopinath, C. and Richard C. Hoffman (1995): A Comment on the Relevance of Strategy Research, in: Paul Shrivastava and Charles Stubbart (eds.): Challenges From Within the Mainstream, Greenwich, 93–110.
Gordon, Michael E., Lawrence S. Kleiman, and Charles A. Hanie (1978): Industrial-Organizational Psychology: “Open the Ears, o House of Israel”, American Psychologist, 33 (10): 893–905.
Grey, Christopher (2001): Re-imagining Relevance: A Response to Starkey and Madan, British Journal of Management, 12 (Special Issue): 27–32.
Gulati, Ranjay (2007): Tent Poles, Tribalism, and Boundary Spanning: The Rigor-Relevance Debate in Management Research, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (4): 775–782.
Hambrick, Donald C. (1994): 1993 Presidential Address: What if the Academy Actually Mattered?, Academy of Management Review, 19 (1): 11–16.
Hambrick, Donald C. (2007): The Field of Management’s Devotion to Theory: Too Much of a Good Thing?, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6): 1346–1352.
Hennart, Jean-François (2007): The Theoretical Rationale for a Multinationality-Performance Relationship, Management International Review, 47 (3): 423–452.
Hodgkinson, Gerard P. and Denise M. Rousseau (2009): Bridging the Rigour-Relevance Gap in Management Research: It’s Already Happening!, Journal of Management Studies, 46 (3): 534–546.
Hughes, Tim, David Bence, Louise Grisoni, Nicholas O’Regan, and David Wornham (2011): Scholarship That Matters: Academic Practitioner Engagement in Business and Management, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10 (1): 40–57.
Jarzabkowski, Paula, Susan Albers Mohrman, and Andreas Georg Scherer (2010): Organization Studies as Applied Science: The Generation and Use of Academic Knowledge About Organizations — Introduction to the Special Issue, Organization Studies, 31 (9/10): 1189–1207.
Kelemen, Mihaela and Pratima Bansal (2002): The Conventions of Management Research and Their Relevance to Management Practice, British Journal of Management, 13 (2): 97–108.
Keller, Robert T. (2001): Cross-Functional Project Groups in Research and New Product Development: Diversity, Communications, Job Stress, and Outcomes, Academy of Management Journal, 44 (3): 547–555.
Kieser, Alfred (2010): Unternehmen Wissenschaft?, Leviathan, 38 (3): 347–367.
Kieser, Alfred and Lars Leiner (2009): Why the Rigour-Relevance Gap in Management Research is Unbridgeable, Journal of Management Studies, 46 (3): 516–533.
Kilduff, Martin and Mihaela Kelemen (2001): The Consolations of Organization Theory, British Journal of Management, 12 (Special Issue): 55–59.
Lewin, Arie Y., Carmen B. Weigelt, and James B. Emery (2004): Adaptation and Selection in Strategy and Change: Perspectives on Strategic Change in Organizations, in: Marshall S. Poole and Andrew H. Van de Ven (eds.): Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 108–160.
Lichtenthaler, Ulrich (2009): Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes, Academy of Management Journal, 52 (4): 822–846.
Luhmann, Niklas (1982): The Differentiation of Society, Columbia University Press: New York, NY.
Luhmann, Niklas (1995): Social Systems, Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.
Lyles, Marjorie A. (1990): A Research Agenda for Strategic Management in the 1990s, Journal of Management Studies, 27 (4): 363–375.
Manly, Bryan F. J. (1992): The Design and Analysis of Research Studies, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
March, James G., Lee S. Sproull, and Michal Tamuz (1991): Learning from Samples of One and Fewer, Organization Science, 2 (1): 1–13.
March, James G. and Robert I. Sutton (1997): Organization Performance as a Dependent Variable, Organization Science, 8 (6): 698–706.
Marcus, Alfred A., Robert S. Goodman, and David N. Grazman (1995): The Diffusion of Strategic Management Frameworks, in: Paul Shrivastava and Charles Stubbart (eds.): Challenges From Within the Mainstream, Greenwich, 115–145.
Maurer, Indre and Mark Ebers (2006): Dynamics of Social Capital and Their Performance Implications: Lessons From Biotechnology Start-Ups, Administrative Science Quarterly, 51 (2), 262–292.
McKelvey, Bill (2006): Van de Ven and Johnson’s “Engaged Scholarship”: Nice Try, But …, Academy of Management Review, 31 (4): 822–829.
Miller, Delbert C. (1991): Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement, 5th ed., Sage: Newbury Park, CA et al.
Mintzberg, Henry (1973): The Nature of Managerial Work, Harper & Row: New York, NY.
Mitchell, Mark and Janina Jolley (2001): Research Design Explained, 4th ed., Harcourt College Publishers: Fort Worth, TX et al.
Mohrman, Susan Albers, Cristina B. Gibson, and Allan M. Mohrman Jr. (2001): Doing Research That Is Useful to Practice: A Model and Empirical Exploration, Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2): 357–375.
Nicolai, Alexander T. (2004): Der “trade-off” zwischen “rigour” und “relevance” und seine Konsequenzen für die Management-Wissenschaften, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 74 (2): 99–118.
Nicolai, Alexander T. and Alfred Kieser (2002): Trotz eklatanter Erfolglosigkeit: Die Erfolgsfaktorenforschung weiter auf Erfolgskurs, Die Betriebswirtschaft, 62 (6): 579–596.
Nicolai, Alexander T. and David Seidl (2010): That’s Relevant! Different Forms of Practical Relevance in Management Science, Organization Studies, 31 (09/10): 1257–1285.
Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons (2001): Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Polity Press: Cambridge, UK et al.
Oesterle, Michael-Jörg (2006): Wahrnehmung betriebswirt-schaftlicher Fachzeitschriften durch Praktiker, Die Betriebswirt-schaft, 66 (3): 307–325.
Pettigrew, Andrew M. (2001): Management Research After Modernism, British Journal of Management, 12 (Special Issue): 61–70.
Pinto, Mary Beth, Jeffrey K. Pinto, and John E. Prescott (1993): Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-Functional Cooperation, Management Science, 39 (10): 1281–1297.
Polzer, Jeffrey T., Ranjay Gulati, Rakesh Khurana, and Michael L. Tushman (2009): Crossing Boundaries to Increase Relevance in Organizational Research, Journal of Management Inquiry, 18 (4): 280–286.
Rasche, Andreas and Michael Behnam (2009): As If It Were Relevant: A Systems Theoretical Perspective on the Relation Between Science and Practice, Journal of Management Inquiry, 18 (3): 243–255.
Rynes, Sara L., Jean M. Bartunek, and Richard L. Daft (2001): Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics, Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2): 340–355.
Shapiro, Debra L., Bradley L. Kirkman, and Hugh G. Courtney (2007): Perceived Causes and Solutions of the Translation Problem in Management Research, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (2): 249–266.
Shepherd, Dean A., Holger Patzelt, and Marcus Wolfe (2011): Moving Forward From Project Failure: Negative Emotions, Affective Commitment, and Learning From the Experience, Academy of Management Journal, 54 (6): 1229–1259.
Shin, Shung J., Tae-Yeol Kim, Jeong-Yeon Lee, and Lin Bian (2012): Cognitive Team Diversity and Individual Team Member Creativity: A Cross-Level Interaction, Academy of Management Journal, 55 (1): 197–212.
Shrivastava, Paul (1987): Rigor and Practical Usefulness of Research in Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 8 (1): 77–92.
Siggelkow, Nicolaj (2007): Persuasion With Case Studies, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 20–24.
Singh, Kulwant, Siah Hwee Ang, and Siew Meng Leong (2003): Increasing Replication for Knowledge Accumulation in Strategy Research, Journal of Management, 29 (4): 533–549.
Sørensen, Jesper B. (2002): The Strength of Corporate Culture and the Reliability of Firm Performance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (1): 70–91.
Starkey, Ken and Paula Madan (2001): Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research, British Journal of Management, 12 (Special Issue): S3–S26.
Thomas, Kenneth W. and Walter G. Tymon Jr. (1982): Necessary Properties of Relevant Research: Lessons From Recent Criticisms of the Organizational Sciences, Academy of Management Review, 7 (3): 345–352.
Van de Vall, Mark, Cheryl Bolas, and Tai S. Kang (1976): Applied Social Research in Industrial Organizations: An Evaluation of Functions, Theory, and Methods, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12 (2): 158–177.
Van de Ven, Andrew H. and Paul E. Johnson (2006): Knowledge for Theory and Practice, Academy of Management Review, 31 (4): 802–821.
Varadarajan, P. Rajan (2003): Musings on Relevance and Rigor of Scholarly Research in Marketing, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (4): 368–376.
Vermeulen, Freek (2005): On Rigor and Relevance: Fostering Dialectic Progress in Management Research, Academy of Management Journal, 48 (6): 978–982.
Yin, Robert K. (2003): Case Study Research, 3rd ed. Sage: New-bury Park, CA et al.
Zahra, Shaker A. and John A. Pearce (1992): Priorities of CEOs and Strategic Management Professors for Future Academic Research, Journal of Management Issues, 14 (2): 171–189.
Zmud, Robert W. (1996): Editor’s Comments: On Rigor and Relevancy, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 20 (3): 37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Wolf, J., Rosenberg, T. How Individual Scholars Can Reduce the Rigor-Relevance Gap in Management Research. Bus Res 5, 178–196 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342737
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342737