Abstract
We studied demography, territoriality and social/mate system of the Brazilian population of Yellow Cardinal (Gubernatrix cristata). The study was conducted in the municipality of Barra do Quaraí, western Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, during two breeding seasons (October to February, 2013-2015). We ringed 35 (seven females, 14 males and 14 young) out of 53 individuals found, and by September 2015, the Brazilian population of Yellow Cardinal had 38 remaining individuals. Adult sex ratio was 1.5:1 and the lifespan was at least 8 years. Pairs are socially monogamous and territorial, with male-biased philopatry and female-biased dispersal. The mean territory size was 18 ha, and mean home range was 27.7 ha. Some pairs and nests (23%) were attended by one or two nest helpers, which contributed on nest and territory defense, and provisioning of nestlings and fledglings. Presence of helpers is a key new finding for this species. Parental care was biparental or cooperative, and the pair had high frequency of visits to the nest than helpers. Mean nest productivity was two fledglings/successful nest attended by helpers, and one fledgling/successful nest not attended by helpers. We recorded second broods after a successful attempt, only when helpers were present. Overall Mayfield nesting success was 18%, 40% for nests with and 13% without helpers. We recorded a case of inbreeding, between father and daughter. The species need for large home ranges and factors that may adversely affect the breeding success such as inbreeding, predation, and parasitism can exacerbate the status of the threatened Brazilian population and the species. It reinforces the importance of autecology studies and their contribution to the conservation schemes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Altmann J. 1974. Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267.
Alves M.A.S. 1990. Social system and helping behavior in the Whitebanded Tanager (Neothraupis fasciata). Condor 92: 470–474.
Arnold K.E. & Owens I.P.F. 1998. Cooperative breeding in birds: a comparative test of the life history hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 265: 739–745.
Azpiroz A.B., Alfaro M. & Jiménez S. 2012. Lista roja de las aves del Uruguay. Montevideo: Dirección Nacional de Medio Ambiente.
Barker F.K., Burns K.J., Klicka J., Lanyon S.M. & Lovette I.J. 2013. Going to extremes: contrasting rates of diversification in a recent radiation of New World passerine birds. Systematic Biology 62: 298–320.
Beier P., van Drielen M. & Kankam B.O. 2002. Avifaunal collapse in west African forest fragments. Conservation Biology 16: 1097–1111.
Berg E.C., Aldredge R.A., Peterson A.T. & McCormack J.E. 2012. New phylogenetic information suggests both an increase and at least one loss of cooperative breeding during the evolutionary history of Aphelocoma jays. Evolutionary Ecology 26: 43–54.
BirdLife International. 2015. Species factsheet: Gubernatrix cristata. http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/speciesfactsheet.php?id=9078 (acessado em 21 December 2015).
Burns K.J., Shultz A.J., Title P.O., Mason N.A., Barker F.K., Klicka J., Lanyon S.M. & Lovette I.J. 2014. Phylogenetics and diversification of tanagers (Passeriformes: Thraupidae), the largest radiation of Neotropical songbirds. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 75: 41–77.
Burt D.B., Coulter P.F. & Ligon J.D. 2007. Evolution of parental care and cooperative breeding, p. 295–326. In: Jamieson B.G.M. (ed.). Reproductive biology and phylogeny of birds, Part B: sexual selection, behavior, conservation, embryology and genetics. Enfield: Science Publishers.
Calenge C. 2006. The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling 197: 516–519.
Canestrari D., Marcos J.M. & Baglione V. 2009. Cooperative breeding in Carrion Crows reduces the rate of brood parasitism by Great Spotted Cuckoos. Animal Behaviour 77: 1337–1344.
Chiarani E. & Fontana CS. 2015. Breeding biology of the Lesser Grass-Finch (Emberizoides ypiranganus) in southern Brazilian upland grasslands. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 127: 441–456.
Cockburn A. 1998. Evolution of helping behavior in cooperatively breeding birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 141–177.
Cockburn A. 2003. Cooperative breeding in Oscine passerines: does sociality inhibit speciation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 270: 2207–2214.
Cockburn A. 2006. Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 273: 1375–1383.
Cockburn A. & Russell A.F. 2011. Cooperative breeding: a question of climate? Current Biology 21: R195–R197.
Dardanelli S., Nores M.L.M. & Nores M. 2006. Minimum area requirements of breeding birds in fragmented woodland of central Argentina. Diversity and Distributions 12: 687–693.
Doerr E.D. & Doerr V.A.J. 2006. Comparative demography of treecreepers: evaluating hypotheses for the evolution and maintenance of cooperative breeding. Animal Behaviour 72: 147–159.
Domínguez M., Reboreda J.C & Mahler B. 2015. Impact of Shiny Cowbird and botfly parasitism on the reproductive success of the globally endangered Yellow Cardinal Gubernatrix cristata. Bird Conservation International 25: 294–305.
Downing P.A., Cornwallis C.K. & Griffin A.S. 2015. Sex, long life and the evolutionary transition to cooperative breeding in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 282: 20151663.
Drobniak S.M., Wagner G., Mourocq E. & Griesser M. 2015. Family living: an overlooked but pivotal social system to understand the evolution of cooperative breeding. Behavioral Ecology 26: 805–811.
Du Plessis M.A., Siegfried W.R. & Armstrong A.J. 1995. Ecological and life-history correlates of cooperative breeding in South African birds. Oecologia 102: 180–188.
Eck S., Fiebig J., Fiedler W, Heynen I., Nicolai B., Tõpfer T, van den Elzen R, Winkler R. & Woog F. 2011. Measuring birds/Vogel Vermessen. Wilhelmshaven: Deutsche Ornithologen-Gesellschaft.
Edwards S.V & Naeem S. 1993. The phylogenetic component of cooperative breeding in perching birds. American Naturalist 141: 754–789.
Ekman J. & Griesser M. 2016. Siberian jays: delayed dispersal in the absence of cooperative breeding, p. 6–18. In: Koenig WD. & Dickinson J.L. (eds.). Cooperative breeding in vertebrates: studies of ecology, evolution, and behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Faria L.P, Carrara L.A. & Rodrigues M. 2007. Dimorfismo sexual de tamanho no Fura-barreira Hylocryptus rectirostris (Wied) (Aves, Furnariidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 24: 207–212.
Feeney W.E., Medina L, Somveille M., Heinsohn R., Hall M.L., Mulder RA., Stein J.A., Kilner RM. & Langmore N.E. 2013. Brood parasitism and the evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Science 342: 1506–1508.
Gamero A., Székely T. & Kappeler P.M. 2014. Delayed juvenile dispersal and monogamy, but no cooperative breeding in White-breasted Mesites (Mesitornis variegata). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68: 73–83.
Gressler D.T 2012. Razão sexual e sobrevivência em Neothraupis fasciata. Ph.D. Thesis. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília.
Gressler D.,T, Pereira Z.P. & Marini M.Â. 2014. Brood sex allocation in the Neotropical cooperative White-banded Tanager Neothraupis fasciata. Journal of Ornithology 155: 713–719.
Hatchwell B.J. 2009. The evolution of cooperative breeding in birds: kinship, dispersal and life history. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 364: 3217–3227.
Heinsohn R. & Legge S. 1999. The cost of helping. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 53–57.
Hensler G.L. & Nichols J.D. 1981. The Mayfield method of estimating nesting success: a model, estimators and simulation results. Wilson Bulletin 93: 42–53.
Hilty S. 2011. Tanagers (Thraupidae), p. 46–155. In: del Hoyo J., Elliott A. & Christie D. (eds.). Handbook of the birds of the world, v. 16 (tanagers to New World blackbirds). Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Jacob A.A. & Rudran R. 2006. Radiotelemetria em estudos populacionais, p. 285–342. In: Cullen-Jr. L., Rudran R. & Valladares-Padua C. (eds.). Métodos de estudos em biologia da conservação e manejo da vida silvestre. Curitiba: Ed. Universidade Federal do Paraná.
Jaramillo A. 2011. Yellow Cardinal, p. 641. In: del Hoyo J., Elliott A., & Christie D. (eds.). Handbook of the birds of the world: tanagers to New World blackbirds. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Jetz W. & Rubenstein D.R. 2011. Environmental uncertainty and the global biogeography of cooperative breeding in birds. Current Biology 21:72–78.
Klimkiewicz M.K. & Futcher A.G. 1987. Longevity records of North American birds: Coerebinae through Estrildidae. Journal of Field Ornithology 58: 318–333.
Koenig W.D., Pitelka FA., Carmen W.J., Mumme R.L. & Stanback M.T. 1992. The evolution of delayed dispersal in cooperative breeders. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 111–150.
Lande R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241: 1455–1460.
Langen T.A. 2000. Prolonged offspring dependence and cooperative breeding in birds. Behavioral Ecology 11: 367–377.
Liker A., Freckleton R.P. & Székely T. 2014. Divorce and infidelity are associated with skewed adult sex ratios in birds. Current Biology 24: 880–884.
López-Lanús B., Grilli P., Di Giacomo A.S., Coconier E.E. & Banchs R. (eds.). 2008. Categorización de las aves de la Argentina según su estado de conservación. Buenos Aires: Informe de Aves Argentinas/ AOP y Secretaria de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable.
Manica L.T. & Marini M.Â. 2012. Helpers at the nest of White-banded Tanager Neothraupis fasciata benefit male breeders but do not increase reproductive success. Journal of Ornithology 153: 149–159.
Marchiori J.N.C. & Aves F.S. 2011. O Inhaduvá (Prosopis affinis Spreng.) no Rio Grande do Sul. 8 - Aspectos fitogeográficos. Balduinial 29: 13–20.
Marini M.Â., Duca C. & Manica L.T. 2010. Técnicas de pesquisa em biologia reprodutiva de aves, p. 295–312. In: von Matter S., Straube F.C., Accordi I.A., Piacentini V.Q. & Cândido-Jr., J.F. (eds.). Ornitologia e conservação: ciência aplicada, técnicas de pesquisa e levantamento. Rio de Janeiro: Technical Books.
Mayfield H.F. 1975. Suggestions for calculating nest success. Wilson Bulletin 87: 456–466.
Nice M.M. 1941. The role of territory in bird life. American Midland Naturalist 26: 441–487.
Odum E.R. & Kuenzler E.J. 1955. Measurement of territory and home range size in birds. Auk 72: 128–137.
Paquet M., Covas R., Chastel O., Parenteau C. & Doutrelant C. 2013. Maternal effects in relation to helper presence in the cooperatively breeding Sociable Weaver. PLoS ONE 8: e59336.
Pavlacky-Jr. D.C., Possingham H.R, Lowe A.J., Prentis P.J., Green D.J. & Goldizen A.W 2012. Anthropogenic landscape change promotes asymmetric dispersal and limits regional patch occupancy in a spatially structured bird population. Journal of Animal Ecology 81: 940–952.
Pereira M.S. 2015. Assembleia de aves territorialistas na formação Espinilho: densidade e seleção de habitat reprodutivo. MSc. Dissertation. Porto Alegre: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.
Pimm S.L., Diamond J., Reed T.M., Russell G.J. & Verner J. 1993. Times to extinction for small populations of large birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90: 10871–10875.
Poiani A. & Jermiin L.S. 1994. A comparative analysis of some life-history traits between cooperatively and non-cooperatively breeding Australian passerines. Evolutionary Ecology 8: 471–488.
Powell R.A. & Mitchell M.S. 2012. What is a home range? Journal of Mammalogy 93: 948–958.
R Core Team. 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org (access on 15 December 2015).
Russell A.F., Langmore N.E., Cockburn A., Astheimer L.B. & Kilner R.M. 2007. Reduced egg investment can conceal helper effects in cooperatively breeding birds. Science 317: 941–944.
Schaub R., Mumme R.L. & Woolfenden G.E. 1992. Predation on the eggs and nestlings of Florida Scrub Jays. Auk 109: 585–593.
Seaman D.E., Millspaugh J.J., Kernohan B.J., Brundige G.C., Raedeke K.J. & Gitzen RA. 1999. Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 739–747.
Martins-Ferreira C., Bencke GA., Fontana CS., Dias RA., Repenning M., Damiani R.V., Maurício G.N., Gianuca A.T., Krügel M.M., Franz I., Rovedder C.E., Rupp A.E., Pereira M.S., Vizentin-Bugoni J., Joenck C.M., Straube F.C., Reinert B.L., Bornschein M.R., Dias D., Vieira B.P & Serafini, P.P. 2013. Plano de Ação Nacional para a conservação dos Passeriformes ameaçados dos Campos Sulinos e Espinilho. Brasília: Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. Série espécies ameaçadas 31.
Soares, C.G.D. 2007. Biologia e conservação de Neothraupis fasciata (Aves: Thraupidae) no cerrado do Brasil central. Ph.D. Thesis. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília.
Stacey P.B. & Taper M. 1992. Environmental variation and the persistence of small populations. Ecological Applications 1: 18–29.
Stutchbury B.J.M. & Morton E.S. 2001. Behavioral ecology of tropical birds. London: Academic Press.
Székely T., Liker A., Freckleton R.P., Fichtel C. & Kappeler P.M. 2014. Sex-biased survival predicts adult sex ratio variation in wild birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 281: 20140342.
Székely T., Lislevand T & Figuerola J. 2007. Sexual size dimorphism in birds, p. 27–37. In: Fairbairn D.J., Blanckenhorn W.U. & Székely T. (eds.). Sex, size and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Welty J.C & Baptista L.F. 1988. The life of birds. New York: W B. Saunders.
Wolfe J.D. Ryder T.B., Pyle P. 2010. Using molt cycles to categorize the age of tropical birds: an integrative new system. Journal of Field Ornithology 81: 186–194.
Woolfenden G.E. & Fitzpatrick J.W 1984. The Florida Scrub Jay: demography of a cooperative-breeding bird. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Beier, C., Repenning, M., da Pereira, M.S. et al. Cooperative breeding and demography of Yellow Cardinal Gubernatrix cristata in Brazil. Rev. Bras. Ornitol. 25, 12–19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03544371
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03544371