Abstract
We comment on a recent paper of Almheiri, Marolf, Polchinski and Sully who argue against black hole complementarity based on the claim that an infalling observer ‘burns’ as he attempts to cross the horizon. We show that measurements made by an infalling observer outside the horizon are statistically identical for the cases of vacuum at the horizon and radiation emerging from a stretched horizon. This forces us to follow the dynamics all the way to the horizon, where we need to know the details of Planck-scale physics. We note that in string theory the fuzzball structure of microstates does not give any place to ‘continue through’ this Planck regime. AMPS argue that interactions near the horizon preclude traditional complementarity. But the conjecture of ‘fuzzball complementarity’ works in the opposite way: the infalling quantum is absorbed by the fuzzball surface, and it is the resulting dynamics that is conjectured to admit a complementary description.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333 [INSPIRE].
S. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199 [Erratum ibid. 46 (1976) 206] [INSPIRE].
S. Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2460 [INSPIRE].
G. ’t Hooft, The holographic principle: opening lecture, hep-th/0003004 [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, The world as a hologram, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6377 [hep-th/9409089] [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, The stretched horizon and black hole complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306069] [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, String theory and the principles of black hole complementarity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 2367 [hep-th/9307168] [INSPIRE].
D.A. Lowe, J. Polchinski, L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, Black hole complementarity versus locality, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 6997 [hep-th/9506138] [INSPIRE].
A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 99 [hep-th/9601029] [INSPIRE].
O. Lunin and S.D. Mathur, AdS/CFT duality and the black hole information paradox, Nucl. Phys. B 623 (2002) 342 [hep-th/0109154] [INSPIRE].
O. Lunin and S.D. Mathur, Statistical interpretation of bekenstein entropy for systems with a stretched horizon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 211303 [hep-th/0202072] [INSPIRE].
O. Lunin, J.M. Maldacena and L. Maoz, Gravity solutions for the D1-D5 system with angular momentum, hep-th/0212210 [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, A. Saxena and Y.K. Srivastava, Constructing ‘hair’ for the three charge hole, Nucl. Phys. B 680 (2004) 415 [hep-th/0311092] [INSPIRE].
O. Lunin, Adding momentum to D1-D5 system, JHEP 04 (2004) 054 [hep-th/0404006] [INSPIRE].
S. Giusto, S.D. Mathur and A. Saxena, 3-charge geometries and their CFT duals, Nucl. Phys. B 710 (2005) 425 [hep-th/0406103] [INSPIRE].
I. Bena and N.P. Warner, One ring to rule them all . . . and in the darkness bind them?, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 9 (2005) 667 [hep-th/0408106] [INSPIRE].
I. Bena and N.P. Warner, Bubbling supertubes and foaming black holes, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 066001 [hep-th/0505166] [INSPIRE].
P. Berglund, E.G. Gimon and T.S. Levi, Supergravity microstates for BPS black holes and black rings, JHEP 06 (2006) 007 [hep-th/0505167] [INSPIRE].
A. Saxena, G. Potvin, S. Giusto and A.W. Peet, Smooth geometries with four charges in four dimensions, JHEP 04 (2006) 010 [hep-th/0509214] [INSPIRE].
V. Balasubramanian, E.G. Gimon and T.S. Levi, Four dimensional black hole microstates: from D-branes to spacetime foam, JHEP 01 (2008) 056 [hep-th/0606118] [INSPIRE].
J. de Boer, F. Denef, S. El-Showk, I. Messamah and D. Van den Bleeken, Black hole bound states in AdS 3 × S 2, JHEP 11 (2008) 050 [arXiv:0802.2257] [INSPIRE].
I. Bena, J. de Boer, M. Shigemori and N.P. Warner, Double, double supertube bubble, JHEP 10 (2011) 116 [arXiv:1107.2650] [INSPIRE].
S. Giusto, R. Russo and D. Turton, New D1-D5-P geometries from string amplitudes, JHEP 11 (2011) 062 [arXiv:1108.6331] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur and D. Turton, Microstates at the boundary of AdS, JHEP 05 (2012) 014 [arXiv:1112.6413] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur and D. Turton, Momentum-carrying waves on D1-D5 microstate geometries, Nucl. Phys. B 862 (2012) 764 [arXiv:1202.6421] [INSPIRE].
O. Lunin, S.D. Mathur and D. Turton, Adding momentum to supersymmetric geometries, Nucl. Phys. B 868 (2013) 383 [arXiv:1208.1770] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, The information paradox: a pedagogical introduction, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 224001 [arXiv:0909.1038] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, The information paradox and the infall problem, Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 125010 [arXiv:1012.2101] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur and C.J. Plumberg, Correlations in Hawking radiation and the infall problem, JHEP 09 (2011) 093 [arXiv:1101.4899] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, Black holes and beyond, Annals Phys. 327 (2012) 2760 [arXiv:1205.0776] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, Black holes and holography, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 405 (2012) 012005 [arXiv:1207.5431] [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?, JHEP 02 (2013) 062 [arXiv:1207.3123] [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso, Complementarity is not enough, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 124023 [arXiv:1207.5192] [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow, Complementarity, not firewalls, arXiv:1207.6243 [INSPIRE].
Y. Nomura, J. Varela and S.J. Weinberg, Complementarity endures: no firewall for an infalling observer, JHEP 03 (2013) 059 [arXiv:1207.6626] [INSPIRE].
S.L. Braunstein, S. Pirandola and K. Życzkowski, Entangled black holes as ciphers of hidden information, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 101301 [arXiv:0907.1190] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, The fuzzball proposal for black holes: an elementary review, Fortsch. Phys. 53 (2005) 793 [hep-th/0502050] [INSPIRE].
I. Bena and N.P. Warner, Black holes, black rings and their microstates, Lect. Notes Phys. 755 (2008) 1 [hep-th/0701216] [INSPIRE].
K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, The fuzzball proposal for black holes, Phys. Rept. 467 (2008) 117 [arXiv:0804.0552] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, Fuzzballs and the information paradox: A Summary and conjectures, arXiv:0810.4525 [INSPIRE].
B.D. Chowdhury and A. Virmani, Modave lectures on fuzzballs and emission from the D1-D5 system, arXiv:1001.1444 [INSPIRE].
B. Czech, K. Larjo and M. Rozali, Black holes as Rubik’s cubes, JHEP 08 (2011) 143 [arXiv:1106.5229] [INSPIRE].
S.G. Avery, Qubit models of black hole evaporation, JHEP 01 (2013) 176 [arXiv:1109.2911] [INSPIRE].
S.B. Giddings, Models for unitary black hole disintegration, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 044038 [arXiv:1108.2015] [INSPIRE].
S.B. Giddings, Black holes, quantum information and unitary evolution, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 124063 [arXiv:1201.1037] [INSPIRE].
S.B. Giddings and Y. Shi, Quantum information transfer and models for black hole mechanics, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 064031 [arXiv:1205.4732] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, The information paradox: conflicts and resolutions, Pramana 79 (2012) 1059 [arXiv:1201.2079] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, Emission rates, the correspondence principle and the information paradox, Nucl. Phys. B 529 (1998) 295 [hep-th/9706151] [INSPIRE].
S.R. Das and S.D. Mathur, Excitations of D strings, entropy and duality, Phys. Lett. B 375 (1996) 103 [hep-th/9601152] [INSPIRE].
V. Jejjala, O. Madden, S.F. Ross and G. Titchener, Non-supersymmetric smooth geometries and D1-D5-P bound states, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 124030 [hep-th/0504181] [INSPIRE].
V. Cardoso, O.J. Dias, J.L. Hovdebo and R.C. Myers, Instability of non-supersymmetric smooth geometries, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 064031 [hep-th/0512277] [INSPIRE].
B.D. Chowdhury and S.D. Mathur, Radiation from the non-extremal fuzzball, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 135005 [arXiv:0711.4817] [INSPIRE].
B.D. Chowdhury and S.D. Mathur, Pair creation in non-extremal fuzzball geometries, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 225021 [arXiv:0806.2309] [INSPIRE].
B.D. Chowdhury and S.D. Mathur, Non-extremal fuzzballs and ergoregion emission, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 035006 [arXiv:0810.2951] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, Tunneling into fuzzball states, Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 (2010) 113 [arXiv:0805.3716] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, How fast can a black hole release its information?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 18 (2009) 2215 [arXiv:0905.4483] [INSPIRE].
O. Lunin and S.D. Mathur, Rotating deformations of AdS 3 × S 3 , the orbifold CFT and strings in the pp wave limit, Nucl. Phys. B 642 (2002) 91 [hep-th/0206107] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Maldacena, The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113] [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] [INSPIRE].
S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109] [INSPIRE].
S.G. Avery, B.D. Chowdhury and S.D. Mathur, Emission from the D1D5 CFT, JHEP 10 (2009) 065 [arXiv:0906.2015] [INSPIRE].
C.G. Callan and J.M. Maldacena, D-brane approach to black hole quantum mechanics, Nucl. Phys. B 472 (1996) 591 [hep-th/9602043] [INSPIRE].
A. Dhar, G. Mandal and S.R. Wadia, Absorption versus decay of black holes in string theory and T symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 51 [hep-th/9605234] [INSPIRE].
S.R. Das and S.D. Mathur, Comparing decay rates for black holes and D-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 478 (1996) 561 [hep-th/9606185] [INSPIRE].
S.R. Das and S.D. Mathur, Interactions involving D-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 482 (1996) 153 [hep-th/9607149] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, Black hole grey body factors and D-brane spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 861 [hep-th/9609026] [INSPIRE].
M. Van Raamsdonk, Comments on quantum gravity and entanglement, arXiv:0907.2939 [INSPIRE].
M. Van Raamsdonk, Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement, Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 (2010) 2323 [arXiv:1005.3035] [INSPIRE].
W. Israel, Thermo field dynamics of black holes, Phys. Lett. A 57 (1976) 107 [INSPIRE].
L.C. Crispino, A. Higuchi and G.E. Matsas, The unruh effect and its applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 (2008) 787 [arXiv:0710.5373] [INSPIRE].
W. Zurek, Entropy evaporated by a black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1683 [INSPIRE].
D.N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1291 [gr-qc/9305007] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in Anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking, Information loss in black holes, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 084013 [hep-th/0507171] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1208.2005
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Mathur, S.D., Turton, D. Comments on black holes I: the possibility of complementarity. J. High Energ. Phys. 2014, 34 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2014)034
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2014)034