Abstract
In this paper, we obtain some general results on information retrieval from the black hole interior, based on the recent progress on quantum extremal surface formula and entanglement island. We study an AdS black hole coupled to a bath with generic dynamics, and ask whether it is possible to retrieve information about a small perturbation in the interior from the bath system. We show that the one-norm distance between two reduced states in a bath region A is equal to the same quantity in the bulk quantum field theory for region AI where I is the entanglement island of A. This is a straightforward generalization of bulk-boundary correspondence in AdS/CFT. However, we show that a contradiction arises if we apply this result to a special situation when the bath dynamics includes a unitary operation that carries a particular measurement to a region A and send the result to another region W. Physically, the contradiction arises between transferability of classical information during the measurement, and non-transferability of quantum information which determines the entanglement island.
We propose that the resolution of the contradiction is to realize that the state reconstruction formula does not apply to the special situation involving interior-information-retrieving measurements. This implies that the assumption of smooth replica AdS geometry with boundary condition set by the flat space bath has to break down when the particular measurement operator is applied to the bath. Using replica trick, we introduce an explicitly construction of such operator, which we name as “miracle operators”. From this construction we see that the smooth replica geometry assumption breaks down because we have to introduce extra replica wormholes connecting with the “simulated blackholes” introduced by the miracle operator. We study the implication of miracle operators in understanding the firewall paradox.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199 [Erratum ibid. 46 (1976) 206] [INSPIRE].
D. N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1291 [gr-qc/9305007] [INSPIRE].
G. Penington, Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox, JHEP 09 (2020) 002 [arXiv:1905.08255] [INSPIRE].
G. Fejős and N. Yamamoto, Functional renormalization group approach to color superconducting phase transition, JHEP 12 (2019) 069 [arXiv:1908.03535] [INSPIRE].
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE].
V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE].
T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1307.2892] [INSPIRE].
G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, arXiv:1911.11977 [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation, JHEP 05 (2020) 013 [arXiv:1911.12333] [INSPIRE].
Y. Chen, Pulling out the island with modular flow, JHEP 03 (2020) 033 [arXiv:1912.02210] [INSPIRE].
D. L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S. J. Suh, Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy, JHEP 06 (2016) 004 [arXiv:1512.06431] [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?, JHEP 02 (2013) 062 [arXiv:1207.3123] [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully, An apologia for firewalls, JHEP 09 (2013) 018 [arXiv:1304.6483] [INSPIRE].
X. Dong, X.-L. Qi, Z. Shangnan and Z. Yang, Effective entropy of quantum fields coupled with gravity, JHEP 10 (2020) 052 [arXiv:2007.02987] [INSPIRE].
A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1304.4926] [INSPIRE].
X. Dong, A. Lewkowycz and M. Rangamani, Deriving covariant holographic entanglement, JHEP 11 (2016) 028 [arXiv:1607.07506] [INSPIRE].
X. Dong and A. Lewkowycz, Entropy, extremality, euclidean variations, and the equations of motion, JHEP 01 (2018) 081 [arXiv:1705.08453] [INSPIRE].
D. Aharonov, J. Cotler and X.-L. Qi, Quantum algorithmic measurement, arXiv:2101.04634.
P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral, arXiv:1903.11115 [INSPIRE].
D. Stanford and E. Witten, JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 24 (2020) 1475 [arXiv:1907.03363] [INSPIRE].
P. Saad, Late time correlation functions, baby universes, and ETH in JT gravity, arXiv:1910.10311 [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso and E. Wildenhain, Gravity/ensemble duality, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 066005 [arXiv:2006.16289] [INSPIRE].
D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information, JHEP 08 (2020) 044 [arXiv:2002.08950] [INSPIRE].
D. Stanford, More quantum noise from wormholes, arXiv:2008.08570 [INSPIRE].
J. Pollack, M. Rozali, J. Sully and D. Wakeham, Eigenstate thermalization and disorder averaging in gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 021601 [arXiv:2002.02971] [INSPIRE].
N. Afkhami-Jeddi, H. Cohn, T. Hartman and A. Tajdini, Free partition functions and an averaged holographic duality, JHEP 01 (2021) 130 [arXiv:2006.04839] [INSPIRE].
A. Maloney and E. Witten, Averaging over Narain moduli space, JHEP 10 (2020) 187 [arXiv:2006.04855] [INSPIRE].
A. Belin and J. de Boer, Random statistics of OPE coefficients and Euclidean wormholes, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 164001 [arXiv:2006.05499] [INSPIRE].
J. Cotler and K. Jensen, AdS3 gravity and random CFT, JHEP 04 (2021) 033 [arXiv:2006.08648] [INSPIRE].
Y. Chen and H. W. Lin, Signatures of global symmetry violation in relative entropies and replica wormholes, JHEP 03 (2021) 040 [arXiv:2011.06005] [INSPIRE].
P.-S. Hsin, L. V. Iliesiu and Z. Yang, A violation of global symmetries from replica wormholes and the fate of black hole remnants, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 194004 [arXiv:2011.09444] [INSPIRE].
A. Belin, J. De Boer, P. Nayak and J. Sonner, Charged eigenstate thermalization, euclidean wormholes and global symmetries in quantum gravity, arXiv:2012.07875 [INSPIRE].
A. Milekhin and A. Tajdini, Charge fluctuation entropy of Hawking radiation: a replica-free way to find large entropy, arXiv:2109.03841 [INSPIRE].
X.-L. Qi, Z. Shangnan and Z. Yang, Holevo information and ensemble theory of gravity, arXiv:2111.05355 [INSPIRE].
S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3339 [cond-mat/9212030] [INSPIRE].
A. Kitaev, Hidden correlations in the Hawking radiation and thermal noise, talk given at Fundamental physics prize symposium, (2014).
A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography (part 1), talk given at the KITP program: Entanglement in strongly-correlated quantum matter, https://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, U.S.A., 7 April 2015.
A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography (part 2), talk given at the KITP program: Entanglement in strongly-correlated quantum matter, https://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, U.S.A., 27 May 2015.
P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter and Z. Yang, Holographic duality from random tensor networks, JHEP 11 (2016) 009 [arXiv:1601.01694] [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, Comments on the final state proposal and the gravitational path integral, lecture at the YITP workshop Recent progress in theoretical physics based on quantum information theory, http://www2.yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp/∼qith2021/Almheiri.pdf, (2021).
G. T. Horowitz and J. M. Maldacena, The black hole final state, JHEP 02 (2004) 008 [hep-th/0310281] [INSPIRE].
J. M. Maldacena and L. Maoz, Wormholes in AdS, JHEP 02 (2004) 053 [hep-th/0401024] [INSPIRE].
H. Geng et al., Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity, arXiv:2107.03390 [INSPIRE].
H. Geng et al., Information transfer with a gravitating bath, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 103 [arXiv:2012.04671] [INSPIRE].
C. Chowdhury, V. Godet, O. Papadoulaki and S. Raju, Holography from the Wheeler-DeWitt equation, arXiv:2107.14802 [INSPIRE].
C. Chowdhury, O. Papadoulaki and S. Raju, A physical protocol for observers near the boundary to obtain bulk information in quantum gravity, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 106 [arXiv:2008.01740] [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso and D. Stanford, Measurements without probabilities in the final state proposal, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 044038 [arXiv:1310.7457] [INSPIRE].
K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, An infalling observer in AdS/CFT, JHEP 10 (2013) 212 [arXiv:1211.6767] [INSPIRE].
P. Hayden and G. Penington, Learning the alpha-bits of black holes, JHEP 12 (2019) 007 [arXiv:1807.06041] [INSPIRE].
E. Chitambar, D. Leung, L. Mančinska, M. Ozols and A. Winter, Everything you always wanted to know about LOCC (but were afraid to ask), Commun. Math. Phys. 328 (2014) 303 [arXiv:1210.4583].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2105.06579
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Qi, XL. Entanglement island, miracle operators and the firewall. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 85 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2022)085
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2022)085