Abstract
Canonical neutrino oscillations arise due to the propagation of three mass eigenstates from production to detection. We aspire to capture, in one simple framework, a broad range of new physics effects on neutrino propagation beyond this canonical picture — this can be done by promoting the neutrino propagators to the general Källén-Lehmann form. In this work we demonstrate how models predicting additional light propagating species of neutrino are naturally accommodated in this language and propose a simple model spectrum composed of just three ‘broadened’ states as a flexible ansatz by which to explore the phenomenology of new physics in neutrino propagation. Reinterpreting existing neutrino oscillation measurements, we illustrate how this framework provides the capacity to probe deviations from the standard three-neutrino scenario systematically and generally. Whilst current data allows for relatively strong constraints on broadened neutrinos, we find the upcoming JUNO experiment will yield significant improvements, particularly for the heaviest neutrino, paving the way to a clearer understanding of how neutrinos propagate in vacuum.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
T. Gherghetta and A. Shkerin, Out of this world neutrino oscillations, FTPI-MINN-22-22 (2022) [INSPIRE].
L. Wolfenstein, Different Varieties of Massive Dirac Neutrinos, Nucl. Phys. B 186 (1981) 147 [INSPIRE].
S.T. Petcov, On Pseudodirac Neutrinos, Neutrino Oscillations and Neutrinoless Double beta Decay, Phys. Lett. B 110 (1982) 245 [INSPIRE].
S.M. Bilenky and B. Pontecorvo, Neutrino Oscillations With Large Oscillation Length in Spite of Large (Majorana) Neutrino Masses?, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 38 (1983) 248 [INSPIRE].
M. Kobayashi and C.S. Lim, Pseudo Dirac scenario for neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 013003 [hep-ph/0012266] [INSPIRE].
A. de Gouvea, W.-C. Huang and J. Jenkins, Pseudo-Dirac Neutrinos in the New Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 073007 [arXiv:0906.1611] [INSPIRE].
G. Anamiati, R.M. Fonseca and M. Hirsch, Quasi Dirac neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095008 [arXiv:1710.06249] [INSPIRE].
G. Anamiati, V. De Romeri, M. Hirsch, C.A. Ternes and M. Tórtola, Quasi-Dirac neutrino oscillations at DUNE and JUNO, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 035032 [arXiv:1907.00980] [INSPIRE].
I. Martinez-Soler, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez and M. Sen, Signs of pseudo-Dirac neutrinos in SN1987A data, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 095019 [arXiv:2105.12736] [INSPIRE].
M. Beuthe, Oscillations of neutrinos and mesons in quantum field theory, Phys. Rept. 375 (2003) 105 [hep-ph/0109119] [INSPIRE].
E.K. Akhmedov and J. Kopp, Neutrino Oscillations: Quantum Mechanics vs. Quantum Field Theory, JHEP 04 (2010) 008 [arXiv:1001.4815] [INSPIRE].
H. Georgi, Unparticle physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 221601 [hep-ph/0703260] [INSPIRE].
K. Choi and S.H. Im, Realizing the relaxion from multiple axions and its UV completion with high scale supersymmetry, JHEP 01 (2016) 149 [arXiv:1511.00132] [INSPIRE].
D.E. Kaplan and R. Rattazzi, Large field excursions and approximate discrete symmetries from a clockwork axion, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 085007 [arXiv:1511.01827] [INSPIRE].
G.F. Giudice and M. McCullough, A Clockwork Theory, JHEP 02 (2017) 036 [arXiv:1610.07962] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen and H. Georgi, (De)constructing dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 4757 [hep-th/0104005] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen and H. Georgi, Electroweak symmetry breaking from dimensional deconstruction, Phys. Lett. B 513 (2001) 232 [hep-ph/0105239] [INSPIRE].
I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz and A. Zhou, The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP 09 (2020) 178 [arXiv:2007.14792] [INSPIRE].
Kamiokande-II collaboration, Observation of a Neutrino Burst from the Supernova SN 1987a, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 1490 [INSPIRE].
K.S. Hirata et al., Observation in the Kamiokande-II Detector of the Neutrino Burst from Supernova SN 1987a, Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 448 [INSPIRE].
R.M. Bionta et al., Observation of a Neutrino Burst in Coincidence with Supernova SN 1987a in the Large Magellanic Cloud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 1494 [INSPIRE].
IMB collaboration, Angular Distribution of Events From Sn1987a, Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 3361 [INSPIRE].
E.N. Alekseev, L.N. Alekseeva, I.V. Krivosheina and V.I. Volchenko, Detection of the Neutrino Signal From SN1987A in the LMC Using the Inr Baksan Underground Scintillation Telescope, Phys. Lett. B 205 (1988) 209 [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, Evidence for High-Energy Extraterrestrial Neutrinos at the IceCube Detector, Science 342 (2013) 1242856 [arXiv:1311.5238] [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, Observation of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos in Three Years of IceCube Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 101101 [arXiv:1405.5303] [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, A combined maximum-likelihood analysis of the high-energy astrophysical neutrino flux measured with IceCube, Astrophys. J. 809 (2015) 98 [arXiv:1507.03991] [INSPIRE].
IceCube-Gen2 collaboration, IceCube-Gen2: the window to the extreme Universe, J. Phys. G 48 (2021) 060501 [arXiv:2008.04323] [INSPIRE].
N. Song, S.W. Li, C.A. Argüelles, M. Bustamante and A.C. Vincent, The Future of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrino Flavor Measurements, JCAP 04 (2021) 054 [arXiv:2012.12893] [INSPIRE].
KamLAND collaboration, Precision Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters with KamLAND, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 221803 [arXiv:0801.4589] [INSPIRE].
KamLAND collaboration, Constraints on θ13 from A Three-Flavor Oscillation Analysis of Reactor Antineutrinos at KamLAND, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 052002 [arXiv:1009.4771] [INSPIRE].
KamLAND collaboration, Reactor On-Off Antineutrino Measurement with KamLAND, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 033001 [arXiv:1303.4667] [INSPIRE].
Daya Bay collaboration, Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 171803 [arXiv:1203.1669] [INSPIRE].
Daya Bay collaboration, Spectral measurement of electron antineutrino oscillation amplitude and frequency at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 061801 [arXiv:1310.6732] [INSPIRE].
Daya Bay collaboration, New Measurement of Antineutrino Oscillation with the Full Detector Configuration at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 111802 [arXiv:1505.03456] [INSPIRE].
Daya Bay collaboration, Measurement of electron antineutrino oscillation based on 1230 days of operation of the Daya Bay experiment, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 072006 [arXiv:1610.04802] [INSPIRE].
Daya Bay collaboration, Measurement of the Electron Antineutrino Oscillation with 1958 Days of Operation at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 241805 [arXiv:1809.02261] [INSPIRE].
S.A.R. Ellis, K.J. Kelly and S.W. Li, Leptonic Unitarity Triangles, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 115027 [arXiv:2004.13719] [INSPIRE].
S.A.R. Ellis, K.J. Kelly and S.W. Li, Current and Future Neutrino Oscillation Constraints on Leptonic Unitarity, JHEP 12 (2020) 068 [arXiv:2008.01088] [INSPIRE].
C.A. Argüelles, T. Bertólez-Martínez and J. Salvado, Impact of Wave Packet Separation in Low-Energy Sterile Neutrino Searches, arXiv:2201.05108 [INSPIRE].
E. Akhmedov and A.Y. Smirnov, Damping of neutrino oscillations, decoherence and the lengths of neutrino wave packets, JHEP 11 (2022) 082 [arXiv:2208.03736] [INSPIRE].
M. Dentler, A. Hernández-Cabezudo, J. Kopp, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz, Sterile neutrinos or flux uncertainties? — Status of the reactor anti-neutrino anomaly, JHEP 11 (2017) 099 [arXiv:1709.04294] [INSPIRE].
JUNO collaboration, Neutrino Physics with JUNO, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 030401 [arXiv:1507.05613] [INSPIRE].
JUNO collaboration, Sub-percent precision measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters with JUNO, Chin. Phys. C 46 (2022) 123001 [arXiv:2204.13249] [INSPIRE].
T. Abrahão, H. Minakata, H. Nunokawa and A.A. Quiroga, Constraint on Neutrino Decay with Medium-Baseline Reactor Neutrino Oscillation Experiments, JHEP 11 (2015) 001 [arXiv:1506.02314] [INSPIRE].
Y.P. Porto-Silva, S. Prakash, O.L.G. Peres, H. Nunokawa and H. Minakata, Constraining visible neutrino decay at KamLAND and JUNO, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 999 [arXiv:2002.12134] [INSPIRE].
A. de Gouvea, V. de Romeri and C.A. Ternes, Probing neutrino quantum decoherence at reactor experiments, JHEP 08 (2020) 018 [arXiv:2005.03022] [INSPIRE].
P. Huber, H. Minakata, D. Minic, R. Pestes and T. Takeuchi, Neutrino oscillations at JUNO, the Born rule, and Sorkin’s triple path interference, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 115013 [arXiv:2105.14061] [INSPIRE].
V.S. Basto-Gonzalez, D.V. Forero, C. Giunti, A.A. Quiroga and C.A. Ternes, Short-baseline oscillation scenarios at JUNO and TAO, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 075023 [arXiv:2112.00379] [INSPIRE].
E. Marzec and J. Spitz, Neutrino decoherence and the mass hierarchy in the JUNO experiment, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 053007 [arXiv:2208.04277] [INSPIRE].
T2K collaboration, Improved constraints on neutrino mixing from the T2K experiment with 3.13 × 1021 protons on target, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 112008 [arXiv:2101.03779] [INSPIRE].
NOvA collaboration, Improved measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters by the NOvA experiment, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 032004 [arXiv:2108.08219] [INSPIRE].
A. de Gouvêa, G. Jusino Sánchez and K.J. Kelly, Very light sterile neutrinos at NOvA and T2K, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 055025 [arXiv:2204.09130] [INSPIRE].
P.B. Denton, J. Gehrlein and R. Pestes, CP-Violating Neutrino Nonstandard Interactions in Long-Baseline-Accelerator Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 051801 [arXiv:2008.01110] [INSPIRE].
S.S. Chatterjee and A. Palazzo, Nonstandard Neutrino Interactions as a Solution to the NOνA and T2K Discrepancy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 051802 [arXiv:2008.04161] [INSPIRE].
DUNE collaboration, Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE): Conceptual Design Report, Volume 2: The Physics Program for DUNE at LBNF, FERMILAB-DESIGN-2016-02 (2015), arXiv:1512.06148 [INSPIRE].
DUNE collaboration, Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Report, Volume II: DUNE Physics, FERMILAB-PUB-20-025-ND (2020), arXiv:2002.03005 [INSPIRE].
Hyper-Kamiokande Proto- collaboration, Physics potential of a long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment using a J-PARC neutrino beam and Hyper-Kamiokande, PTEP 2015 (2015) 053C02 [arXiv:1502.05199] [INSPIRE].
Hyper-Kamiokande collaboration, Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report, arXiv:1805.04163 [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2209.11270
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Banks, H., Kelly, K.J. & McCullough, M. How broad is a neutrino?. J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 136 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2023)136
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2023)136