Abstract
Recent global fit analyses of 3ν oscillation data show a preference for normal mass ordering (NMO) at 2.5σ and provide 1.6σ indications for lower θ23 octant (sin2 θ23 < 0.5) and leptonic CP violation (sin δCP < 0). In this work, we study in detail the capabilities of DUNE to establish the deviation from maximal θ23 and to resolve its octant in light of the current data. Introducing for the first time, a bi-events plot in the plane of total ν and \( \overline{\nu} \) disappearance events, we discuss the impact of sin2 θ23 – ∆\( {m}_{31}^2 \) degeneracy in establishing non-maximal θ23 and show how this degeneracy can be resolved with the help of spectral analysis. A 3σ (5σ) determination of non-maximal θ23 is possible in DUNE with an exposure of 336 kt·MW·years if the true value of sin2 θ23 ≲ 0.465 (0.450) or sin2 θ23 ≳ 0.554 (0.572). We study the role of appearance and disappearance channels, systematic uncertainties, marginalization over oscillation parameters, and the importance of spectral analysis in establishing non-maximal θ23. We observe that both ν and \( \overline{\nu} \) data are essential to settle the θ23 octant at a high confidence level. DUNE can resolve the octant of θ23 at 4.2σ (5σ) using 336 (480) kt·MW·years of exposure for the present best-fit values of oscillation parameters. DUNE can improve the current relative 1σ precision on sin2 θ23 (∆\( {m}_{31}^2 \)) by a factor of 4.4 (2.8) using 336 kt·MW·years of exposure.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
T2K collaboration, The T2K Experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 659 (2011) 106 [arXiv:1106.1238] [INSPIRE].
T2K collaboration, Constraint on the matter-antimatter symmetry-violating phase in neutrino oscillations, Nature 580 (2020) 339 [Erratum ibid. 583 (2020) E16] [arXiv:1910.03887] [INSPIRE].
S. Prakash, S.K. Raut and S.U. Sankar, Getting the Best Out of T2K and NOvA, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 033012 [arXiv:1201.6485] [INSPIRE].
S.K. Agarwalla, S. Prakash, S.K. Raut and S.U. Sankar, Potential of optimized NOvA for large θ(13) & combined performance with a LArTPC & T2K, JHEP 12 (2012) 075 [arXiv:1208.3644] [INSPIRE].
NOvA collaboration, The NOvA Technical Design Report, FERMILAB-DESIGN-2007-01, (2007).
D. Ayres et al., Letter of Intent to build an Off-axis Detector to study numu to nue oscillations with the NuMI Neutrino Beam, hep-ex/0210005 [INSPIRE].
NOvA collaboration, NOvA: Proposal to Build a 30 Kiloton Off-Axis Detector to Study νμ → νe Oscillations in the NuMI Beamline, hep-ex/0503053 [INSPIRE].
NOvA collaboration, An Improved Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters by the NOvA Experiment, arXiv:2108.08219 [INSPIRE].
NuFIT v5.1 (2021), http://www.nu-fit.org/.
P.F. de Salas et al., 2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture, JHEP 02 (2021) 071 [arXiv:2006.11237] [INSPIRE].
F. Capozzi, E. Di Valentino, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Melchiorri and A. Palazzo, Unfinished fabric of the three neutrino paradigm, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 083031 [arXiv:2107.00532] [INSPIRE].
I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz and A. Zhou, The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP 09 (2020) 178 [arXiv:2007.14792] [INSPIRE].
B.T. Cleveland et al., Measurement of the solar electron neutrino flux with the Homestake chlorine detector, Astrophys. J. 496 (1998) 505 [INSPIRE].
SAGE collaboration, Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal. III: Results for the 2002–2007 data-taking period, Phys. Rev. C 80 (2009) 015807 [arXiv:0901.2200] [INSPIRE].
Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Solar neutrino measurements in Super-Kamiokande-I, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 112001 [hep-ex/0508053] [INSPIRE].
Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Solar neutrino measurements in Super-Kamiokande-II, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 032002 [arXiv:0803.4312] [INSPIRE].
Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Solar neutrino results in Super-Kamiokande-III, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 052010 [arXiv:1010.0118] [INSPIRE].
SNO collaboration, Combined Analysis of all Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. C 88 (2013) 025501 [arXiv:1109.0763] [INSPIRE].
G. Bellini et al., Precision measurement of the 7Be solar neutrino interaction rate in Borexino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 141302 [arXiv:1104.1816] [INSPIRE].
Borexino collaboration, Measurement of the solar 8B neutrino rate with a liquid scintillator target and 3 MeV energy threshold in the Borexino detector, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 033006 [arXiv:0808.2868] [INSPIRE].
Borexino collaboration, Neutrinos from the primary proton-proton fusion process in the Sun, Nature 512 (2014) 383 [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, Determining neutrino oscillation parameters from atmospheric muon neutrino disappearance with three years of IceCube DeepCore data, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 072004 [arXiv:1410.7227] [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, Icecube oscillations: 3 years muon neutrino disappearance data, https://icecube.wisc.edu/data-releases/2015/01/icecube-oscillations-3-years-muon-neutrino-disappearance-data/.
Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Atmospheric neutrino oscillation analysis with external constraints in Super-Kamiokande I-IV, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 072001 [arXiv:1710.09126] [INSPIRE].
SuperKamiokande collaboration, Atmospheric neutrino oscillation analysis with external constraints in Super-Kamiokande I-IV, http://www-sk.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/sk/publications/result-e.html#atmosci2018, (2018).
KamLAND collaboration, Reactor On-Off Antineutrino Measurement with KamLAND, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 033001 [arXiv:1303.4667] [INSPIRE].
Daya Bay collaboration, Measurement of the Electron Antineutrino Oscillation with 1958 Days of Operation at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 241805 [arXiv:1809.02261] [INSPIRE].
RENO collaboration, Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation Amplitude and Frequency at RENO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 201801 [arXiv:1806.00248] [INSPIRE].
RENO collaboration, Recent Results from RENO Experiment, talk given at the XXIX International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, Chicago, U.S.A., 2020, https://indico.fnal.gov/event/43209/contributions/187886/attachments/130339/158753/ Neutrino2020YooRENO.pdf.
MINOS collaboration, Measurement of Neutrino and Antineutrino Oscillations Using Beam and Atmospheric Data in MINOS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 251801 [arXiv:1304.6335] [INSPIRE].
MINOS collaboration, Electron neutrino and antineutrino appearance in the full MINOS data sample, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 171801 [arXiv:1301.4581] [INSPIRE].
T2K collaboration, Latest Neutrino Oscillation Results from T2K, talk given at the XXIX International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, Chicago, U.S.A., 2020, https://indico.fnal.gov/event/43209/contributions/187830/attachments/129636/159603/T2K_Neutrino2020.pdf.
NOvA collaboration, New Oscillation Results from the NOvA Experiment, talk given at the XXIX International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, Chicago, U.S.A., 2020, https://indico.fnal.gov/event/43209/contributions/187840/attachments/130740/159597/NOvA-Oscilations-NEUTRINO2020.pdf.
Super Kamiokande collaboration, Recent Results and future prospects from Super-Kamiokande, talk given at the XXIX International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, Chicago, U.S.A., 2020, https://indico.fnal.gov/event/43209/contributions/187863/attachments/129474/159089/nakajima_Neutrino2020.pdf.
P.F. Harrison, D.H. Perkins and W.G. Scott, Tri-bimaximal mixing and the neutrino oscillation data, Phys. Lett. B 530 (2002) 167 [hep-ph/0202074] [INSPIRE].
P.F. Harrison and W.G. Scott, Symmetries and generalizations of tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing, Phys. Lett. B 535 (2002) 163 [hep-ph/0203209] [INSPIRE].
S.F. King, A. Merle, S. Morisi, Y. Shimizu and M. Tanimoto, Neutrino Mass and Mixing: from Theory to Experiment, New J. Phys. 16 (2014) 045018 [arXiv:1402.4271] [INSPIRE].
G.L. Fogli and E. Lisi, Tests of three flavor mixing in long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 3667 [hep-ph/9604415] [INSPIRE].
V. Barger, D. Marfatia and K. Whisnant, Breaking eight fold degeneracies in neutrino CP-violation, mixing, and mass hierarchy, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 073023 [hep-ph/0112119] [INSPIRE].
H. Minakata, H. Nunokawa and S.J. Parke, Parameter Degeneracies in Neutrino Oscillation Measurement of Leptonic CP and T Violation, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 093012 [hep-ph/0208163] [INSPIRE].
H. Minakata, M. Sonoyama and H. Sugiyama, Determination of θ23 in long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with three-flavor mixing effects, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 113012 [hep-ph/0406073] [INSPIRE].
K. Hiraide et al., Resolving θ23 degeneracy by accelerator and reactor neutrino oscillation experiments, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 093008 [hep-ph/0601258] [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and A.Y. Smirnov, Neutrino Mass and New Physics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56 (2006) 569 [hep-ph/0603118] [INSPIRE].
C.H. Albright and M.-C. Chen, Model Predictions for Neutrino Oscillation Parameters, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 113006 [hep-ph/0608137] [INSPIRE].
C.H. Albright, A. Dueck and W. Rodejohann, Possible Alternatives to Tri-bimaximal Mixing, Eur. Phys. J. C 70 (2010) 1099 [arXiv:1004.2798] [INSPIRE].
S.F. King and C. Luhn, Neutrino Mass and Mixing with Discrete Symmetry, Rept. Prog. Phys. 76 (2013) 056201 [arXiv:1301.1340] [INSPIRE].
M. Raidal, Relation between the neutrino and quark mixing angles and grand unification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 161801 [hep-ph/0404046] [INSPIRE].
H. Minakata and A.Y. Smirnov, Neutrino mixing and quark-lepton complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 073009 [hep-ph/0405088] [INSPIRE].
J. Ferrandis and S. Pakvasa, Quark-lepton complenmentarity relation and neutrino mass hierarchy, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 033004 [hep-ph/0412038] [INSPIRE].
S. Antusch, S.F. King and R.N. Mohapatra, Quark-lepton complementarity in unified theories, Phys. Lett. B 618 (2005) 150 [hep-ph/0504007] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Plato’s fire and the neutrino mass matrix, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17 (2002) 2361 [hep-ph/0211393] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma and G. Rajasekaran, Softly broken A4 symmetry for nearly degenerate neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 113012 [hep-ph/0106291] [INSPIRE].
K.S. Babu, E. Ma and J.W.F. Valle, Underlying A4 symmetry for the neutrino mass matrix and the quark mixing matrix, Phys. Lett. B 552 (2003) 207 [hep-ph/0206292] [INSPIRE].
W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, S3 × Z2 model for neutrino mass matrices, JHEP 08 (2005) 013 [hep-ph/0504153] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Tetrahedral family symmetry and the neutrino mixing matrix, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 20 (2005) 2601 [hep-ph/0508099] [INSPIRE].
T. Fukuyama and H. Nishiura, Mass matrix of Majorana neutrinos, hep-ph/9702253 [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and S. Nussinov, Bimaximal neutrino mixing and neutrino mass matrix, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 013002 [hep-ph/9809415] [INSPIRE].
C.S. Lam, A 2-3 symmetry in neutrino oscillations, Phys. Lett. B 507 (2001) 214 [hep-ph/0104116] [INSPIRE].
P.F. Harrison and W.G. Scott, μ - τ reflection symmetry in lepton mixing and neutrino oscillations, Phys. Lett. B 547 (2002) 219 [hep-ph/0210197] [INSPIRE].
T. Kitabayashi and M. Yasue, S2L permutation symmetry for left-handed μ and τ families and neutrino oscillations in an SU(3)L × SU(1)N gauge model, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 015006 [hep-ph/0209294] [INSPIRE].
W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, A discrete symmetry group for maximal atmospheric neutrino mixing, Phys. Lett. B 572 (2003) 189 [hep-ph/0305046] [INSPIRE].
A. Ghosal, An SU(2)L × U(1)Y model with reflection symmetry in view of recent neutrino experimental result, hep-ph/0304090 [INSPIRE].
Y. Koide, Universal texture of quark and lepton mass matrices with an extended flavor 2 → 3 symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 093001 [hep-ph/0312207] [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and W. Rodejohann, Broken μ-τ symmetry and leptonic CP-violation, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 053001 [hep-ph/0507312] [INSPIRE].
Z.-z. Xing and S. Zhou, A partial μ-τ symmetry and its prediction for leptonic CP-violation, Phys. Lett. B 737 (2014) 196 [arXiv:1404.7021] [INSPIRE].
Z.-z. Xing and Z.-h. Zhao, A review of μ-τ flavor symmetry in neutrino physics, Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 (2016) 076201 [arXiv:1512.04207] [INSPIRE].
H. Minakata and S.J. Parke, Correlated, precision measurements of θ23 and δ using only the electron neutrino appearance experiments, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 113005 [arXiv:1303.6178] [INSPIRE].
S. Antusch, P. Huber, J. Kersten, T. Schwetz and W. Winter, Is there maximal mixing in the lepton sector?, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 097302 [hep-ph/0404268] [INSPIRE].
M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni and A.Y. Smirnov, Measuring the deviation of the 2-3 lepton mixing from maximal with atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 093005 [hep-ph/0408170] [INSPIRE].
D. Choudhury and A. Datta, Detecting matter effects in long baseline experiments, JHEP 07 (2005) 058 [hep-ph/0410266] [INSPIRE].
S. Choubey and P. Roy, Probing the deviation from maximal mixing of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 013006 [hep-ph/0509197] [INSPIRE].
D. Indumathi, M.V.N. Murthy, G. Rajasekaran and N. Sinha, Neutrino oscillation probabilities: Sensitivity to parameters, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 053004 [hep-ph/0603264] [INSPIRE].
T. Kajita, H. Minakata, S. Nakayama and H. Nunokawa, Resolving eight-fold neutrino parameter degeneracy by two identical detectors with different baselines, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 013006 [hep-ph/0609286] [INSPIRE].
K. Hagiwara and N. Okamura, Solving the degeneracy of the lepton-flavor mixing angle θatm by the T2KK two detector neutrino oscillation experiment, JHEP 01 (2008) 022 [hep-ph/0611058] [INSPIRE].
A. Samanta and A.Y. Smirnov, The 2-3 mixing and mass split: atmospheric neutrinos and magnetized spectrometers, JHEP 07 (2011) 048 [arXiv:1012.0360] [INSPIRE].
S.K. Agarwalla, S. Prakash and S. Uma Sankar, Exploring the three flavor effects with future superbeams using liquid argon detectors, JHEP 03 (2014) 087 [arXiv:1304.3251] [INSPIRE].
S.-F. Ge, K. Hagiwara and C. Rott, A Novel Approach to Study Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillation, JHEP 06 (2014) 150 [arXiv:1309.3176] [INSPIRE].
S.-F. Ge and K. Hagiwara, Physics Reach of Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements at PINGU, JHEP 09 (2014) 024 [arXiv:1312.0457] [INSPIRE].
A. Chatterjee, P. Ghoshal, S. Goswami and S.K. Raut, Octant sensitivity for large θ13 in atmospheric and long baseline neutrino experiments, JHEP 06 (2013) 010 [arXiv:1302.1370] [INSPIRE].
S. Choubey and A. Ghosh, Determining the Octant of θ23 with PINGU, T2K, NOvA and Reactor Data, JHEP 11 (2013) 166 [arXiv:1309.5760] [INSPIRE].
M. Bass et al., Baseline Optimization for the Measurement of CP-violation, Mass Hierarchy, and θ23 Octant in a Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 052015 [arXiv:1311.0212] [INSPIRE].
P. Coloma, H. Minakata and S.J. Parke, Interplay between appearance and disappearance channels for precision measurements of θ23 and δ, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 093003 [arXiv:1406.2551] [INSPIRE].
K. Bora, D. Dutta and P. Ghoshal, Determining the octant of θ23 at LBNE in conjunction with reactor experiments, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30 (2015) 1550066 [arXiv:1405.7482] [INSPIRE].
C.R. Das, J. Maalampi, J. Pulido and S. Vihonen, Determination of the θ23 octant in LBNO, JHEP 02 (2015) 048 [arXiv:1411.2829] [INSPIRE].
N. Nath, M. Ghosh and S. Goswami, The physics of antineutrinos in DUNE and determination of octant and δCP, Nucl. Phys. B 913 (2016) 381 [arXiv:1511.07496] [INSPIRE].
M. Ghosh, P. Ghoshal, S. Goswami, N. Nath and S.K. Raut, New look at the degeneracies in the neutrino oscillation parameters, and their resolution by T2K, NOνA and ICAL, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 013013 [arXiv:1504.06283] [INSPIRE].
S.K. Agarwalla, S.S. Chatterjee and A. Palazzo, Octant of θ23 in danger with a light sterile neutrino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 031804 [arXiv:1605.04299] [INSPIRE].
P. Ballett, S.F. King, S. Pascoli, N.W. Prouse and T. Wang, Sensitivities and synergies of DUNE and T2HK, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 033003 [arXiv:1612.07275] [INSPIRE].
DUNE collaboration, Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE): Conceptual Design Report, Volume 2: The Physics Program for DUNE at LBNF, arXiv:1512.06148 [INSPIRE].
DUNE collaboration, Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Report, Volume I Introduction to DUNE, 2020 JINST 15 T08008 [arXiv:2002.02967] [INSPIRE].
DUNE collaboration, Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Report, Volume II: DUNE Physics, arXiv:2002.03005 [INSPIRE].
DUNE collaboration, Long-baseline neutrino oscillation physics potential of the DUNE experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 978 [arXiv:2006.16043] [INSPIRE].
DUNE collaboration, Experiment Simulation Configurations Approximating DUNE TDR, arXiv:2103.04797 [INSPIRE].
DUNE collaboration, Low exposure long-baseline neutrino oscillation sensitivity of the DUNE experiment, arXiv:2109.01304 [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01 [INSPIRE].
E.K. Akhmedov, R. Johansson, M. Lindner, T. Ohlsson and T. Schwetz, Series expansions for three flavor neutrino oscillation probabilities in matter, JHEP 04 (2004) 078 [hep-ph/0402175] [INSPIRE].
S.K. Agarwalla, S. Prakash and S.U. Sankar, Resolving the octant of theta23 with T2K and NOvA, JHEP 07 (2013) 131 [arXiv:1301.2574] [INSPIRE].
S.K. Raut, Effect of non-zero θ13 on the measurement of θ23, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28 (2013) 1350093 [arXiv:1209.5658] [INSPIRE].
P. Huber, M. Lindner and W. Winter, Simulation of long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES (General Long Baseline Experiment Simulator), Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 195 [hep-ph/0407333] [INSPIRE].
P. Huber, J. Kopp, M. Lindner, M. Rolinec and W. Winter, New features in the simulation of neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES 3.0: General Long Baseline Experiment Simulator, Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 (2007) 432 [hep-ph/0701187] [INSPIRE].
JUNO collaboration, Neutrino Oscillation Physics in JUNO, talk given at the European Physical Society conference on high energy physics 2021, Berlin, Germany, 2021. https://indico.desy.de/event/28202/contributions/105921/attachments/67350/83887/epshep21_gonchar_juno_oscillation_v1-1-2.pdf.
JUNO collaboration, Neutrino Physics with JUNO, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 030401 [arXiv:1507.05613] [INSPIRE].
M. Blennow, P. Coloma, P. Huber and T. Schwetz, Quantifying the sensitivity of oscillation experiments to the neutrino mass ordering, JHEP 03 (2014) 028 [arXiv:1311.1822] [INSPIRE].
P. Huber, M. Lindner and W. Winter, Superbeams versus neutrino factories, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 3 [hep-ph/0204352] [INSPIRE].
G.L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Montanino and A. Palazzo, Getting the most from the statistical analysis of solar neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 053010 [hep-ph/0206162] [INSPIRE].
M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, Atmospheric neutrino oscillations and new physics, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 033010 [hep-ph/0404085] [INSPIRE].
A. Friedland and S.W. Li, Understanding the energy resolution of liquid argon neutrino detectors, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 036009 [arXiv:1811.06159] [INSPIRE].
V. De Romeri, E. Fernandez-Martinez and M. Sorel, Neutrino oscillations at DUNE with improved energy reconstruction, JHEP 09 (2016) 030 [arXiv:1607.00293] [INSPIRE].
S.K. Agarwalla, S. Prakash and W. Wang, High-precision measurement of atmospheric mass-squared splitting with T2K and NOvA, arXiv:1312.1477 [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2111.11748
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Agarwalla, S.K., Kundu, R., Prakash, S. et al. A close look on 2-3 mixing angle with DUNE in light of current neutrino oscillation data. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 206 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)206
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)206