Abstract
In this second part of the study initiated in [1], we investigate holographic complexity for eternal black hole backgrounds perturbed by shock waves, with both the complexity=action (CA) and complexity=volume (CV) proposals. In particular, we consider Vaidya geometries describing a thin shell of null fluid with arbitrary energy falling in from one of the boundaries of a two-sided AdS-Schwarzschild spacetime. We demonstrate how known properties of complexity, such as the switchback effect for light shocks, as well as analogous properties for heavy ones, are imprinted in the complexity of formation and in the full time evolution of complexity. Following our discussion in [1], we find that in order to obtain the expected properties of the complexity, the inclusion of a particular counterterm on the null boundaries of the Wheeler-DeWitt patch is required for the CA proposal.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Chapman, H. Marrochio and R.C. Myers, Holographic complexity in Vaidya spacetimes. Part I, JHEP 06 (2018) 046 [arXiv:1804.07410] [INSPIRE].
O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, Large N field theories, string theory and gravity, Phys. Rept. 323 (2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111] [INSPIRE].
M. Ammon and J. Erdmenger, Gauge/gravity duality: foundations and applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., (2015) [INSPIRE].
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE].
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 08 (2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073] [INSPIRE].
V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE].
M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, Holographic entanglement entropy, Lect. Notes Phys. 931 (2017) pp.1 [arXiv:1609.01287] [INSPIRE].
M. Van Raamsdonk, Comments on quantum gravity and entanglement, arXiv:0907.2939 [INSPIRE].
M. Van Raamsdonk, Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement, Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 (2010) 2323 [Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 19 (2010) 2429] [arXiv:1005.3035] [INSPIRE].
J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 781 [arXiv:1306.0533] [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, Entanglement is not enough, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 49 [arXiv:1411.0690] [INSPIRE].
J. Watrous, Quantum computational complexity, in Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science, R.A. Meyers ed., Springer, New York, U.S.A., (2009), pg. 7174 [arXiv:0804.3401].
S. Aaronson, The complexity of quantum states and transformations: from quantum money to black holes, arXiv:1607.05256 [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, Computational complexity and black hole horizons, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 24 [Addendum ibid. 64 (2016) 44] [arXiv:1402.5674] [arXiv:1403.5695] [INSPIRE].
D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Complexity and shock wave geometries, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 126007 [arXiv:1406.2678] [INSPIRE].
A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, Holographic complexity equals bulk action?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 191301 [arXiv:1509.07876] [INSPIRE].
A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, Complexity, action and black holes, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 086006 [arXiv:1512.04993] [INSPIRE].
D.A. Roberts, D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Localized shocks, JHEP 03 (2015) 051 [arXiv:1409.8180] [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind and Y. Zhao, Switchbacks and the bridge to nowhere, arXiv:1408.2823 [INSPIRE].
R.-G. Cai, S.-M. Ruan, S.-J. Wang, R.-Q. Yang and R.-H. Peng, Action growth for AdS black holes, JHEP 09 (2016) 161 [arXiv:1606.08307] [INSPIRE].
L. Lehner, R.C. Myers, E. Poisson and R.D. Sorkin, Gravitational action with null boundaries, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 084046 [arXiv:1609.00207] [INSPIRE].
S. Chapman, H. Marrochio and R.C. Myers, Complexity of formation in holography, JHEP 01 (2017) 062 [arXiv:1610.08063] [INSPIRE].
D. Carmi, S. Chapman, H. Marrochio, R.C. Myers and S. Sugishita, On the time dependence of holographic complexity, JHEP 11 (2017) 188 [arXiv:1709.10184] [INSPIRE].
M. Alishahiha, Holographic complexity, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 126009 [arXiv:1509.06614] [INSPIRE].
O. Ben-Ami and D. Carmi, On volumes of subregions in holography and complexity, JHEP 11 (2016) 129 [arXiv:1609.02514] [INSPIRE].
D. Carmi, R.C. Myers and P. Rath, Comments on holographic complexity, JHEP 03 (2017) 118 [arXiv:1612.00433] [INSPIRE].
A.R. Brown and L. Susskind, Second law of quantum complexity, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 086015 [arXiv:1701.01107] [INSPIRE].
P. Caputa, N. Kundu, M. Miyaji, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, Anti-de Sitter space from optimization of path integrals in conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 071602 [arXiv:1703.00456] [INSPIRE].
P. Caputa, N. Kundu, M. Miyaji, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, Liouville action as path-integral complexity: from continuous tensor networks to AdS/CFT, JHEP 11 (2017) 097 [arXiv:1706.07056] [INSPIRE].
B. Czech, Einstein equations from varying complexity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 031601 [arXiv:1706.00965] [INSPIRE].
A. Reynolds and S.F. Ross, Complexity in de Sitter space, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 175013 [arXiv:1706.03788] [INSPIRE].
K. Hashimoto, N. Iizuka and S. Sugishita, Time evolution of complexity in Abelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 126001 [arXiv:1707.03840] [INSPIRE].
R. Jefferson and R.C. Myers, Circuit complexity in quantum field theory, JHEP 10 (2017) 107 [arXiv:1707.08570] [INSPIRE].
S. Chapman, M.P. Heller, H. Marrochio and F. Pastawski, Toward a definition of complexity for quantum field theory states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 121602 [arXiv:1707.08582 [INSPIRE].
L. Hackl and R.C. Myers, Circuit complexity for free fermions, arXiv:1803.10638 [INSPIRE].
J. Couch, S. Eccles, W. Fischler and M.-L. Xiao, Holographic complexity an noncommutative gauge theory, JHEP 03 (2018) 108 [arXiv:1710.07833] [INSPIRE].
M. Moosa, Evolution of complexity following a global quench, JHEP 03 (2018) 031 [arXiv:1711.02668] [INSPIRE].
B. Swingle and Y. Wang, Holographic complexity of Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravity, arXiv:1712.09826 [INSPIRE].
M. Alishahiha, A. Faraji Astaneh, M.R. Mohammadi Mozaffar and A. Mollabashi, Complexity growth with Lifshitz scaling and hyperscaling violation, arXiv:1802.06740 [INSPIRE].
B. Chen, W.-M. Li, R.-Q. Yang, C.-Y. Zhang and S.-J. Zhang, Holographic subregion complexity under a thermal quench, arXiv:1803.06680 [INSPIRE].
Y. Zhao, Uncomplexity and black hole geometry, arXiv:1711.03125 [INSPIRE].
Z. Fu, A. Maloney, D. Marolf, H. Maxfield and Z. Wang, Holographic complexity is nonlocal, JHEP 02 (2018) 072 [arXiv:1801.01137] [INSPIRE].
C.A. Agón, M. Headrick and B. Swingle, Subsystem complexity and holography, arXiv:1804.01561 [INSPIRE].
P.C. Vaidya, The external field of a radiating star in general relativity, Curr. Sci. 12 (1943) 183.
P.C. Vaidya, The gravitational field of a radiating star, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) 33 (1951) 264.
A. Wang and Y. Wu, Generalized Vaidya solutions, Gen. Rel. Grav. 31 (1999) 107 [gr-qc/9803038] [INSPIRE].
S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Multiple shocks, JHEP 12 (2014) 046 [arXiv:1312.3296] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE].
S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Black holes and the butterfly effect, JHEP 03 (2014) 067 [arXiv:1306.0622] [INSPIRE].
T. Anous, T. Hartman, A. Rovai and J. Sonner, Black hole collapse in the 1/c expansion, JHEP 07 (2016) 123 [arXiv:1603.04856] [INSPIRE].
G. Hayward, Gravitational action for space-times with nonsmooth boundaries, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 3275 [INSPIRE].
D. Brill and G. Hayward, Is the gravitational action additive?, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 4914 [gr-qc/9403018] [INSPIRE].
O. Coussaert and M. Henneaux, Supersymmetry of the (2 + 1) black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 183 [hep-th/9310194] [INSPIRE].
L. Fidkowski, V. Hubeny, M. Kleban and S. Shenker, The black hole singularity in AdS/CFT, JHEP 02 (2004) 014 [hep-th/0306170] [INSPIRE].
Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast scramblers, JHEP 10 (2008) 065 [arXiv:0808.2096] [INSPIRE].
Y. Zhao, Complexity, boost symmetry and firewalls, arXiv:1702.03957 [INSPIRE].
R. Khan, C. Krishnan and S. Sharma, Circuit complexity in fermionic field theory, arXiv:1801.07620 [INSPIRE].
J. Couch, W. Fischler and P.H. Nguyen, Noether charge, black hole volume and complexity, JHEP 03 (2017) 119 [arXiv:1610.02038] [INSPIRE].
Z.-Y. Fan and M. Guo, On the Noether charge and the gravity duals of quantum complexity, arXiv:1805.03796 [INSPIRE].
D. Kubiznak, R.B. Mann and M. Teo, Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 063001 [arXiv:1608.06147] [INSPIRE].
R.-G. Cai, S.-M. Ruan, S.-J. Wang, R.-Q. Yang and R.-H. Peng, Action growth for AdS black holes, JHEP 09 (2016) 161 [arXiv:1606.08307] [INSPIRE].
H. Huang, X.-H. Feng and H. Lü, Holographic complexity and two identities of action growth, Phys. Lett. B 769 (2017) 357 [arXiv:1611.02321] [INSPIRE].
P.A. Cano, R.A. Hennigar and H. Marrochio, Complexity growth rate in Lovelock gravity, arXiv:1803.02795 [INSPIRE].
A.R. Brown, L. Susskind and Y. Zhao, Quantum complexity and negative curvature, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 045010 [arXiv:1608.02612] [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, The typical-state paradox: diagnosing horizons with complexity, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 84 [arXiv:1507.02287] [INSPIRE].
J. Maldacena, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, JHEP 08 (2016) 106 [arXiv:1503.01409] [INSPIRE].
M. Van Raamsdonk, Evaporating firewalls, JHEP 11 (2014) 038 [arXiv:1307.1796] [INSPIRE].
A. Buchel, L. Lehner and R.C. Myers, Thermal quenches in N = 2∗ plasmas, JHEP 08 (2012) 049 [arXiv:1206.6785] [INSPIRE].
A. Buchel, L. Lehner, R.C. Myers and A. van Niekerk, Quantum quenches of holographic plasmas, JHEP 05 (2013) 067 [arXiv:1302.2924] [INSPIRE].
R.-Q. Yang, Complexity for quantum field theory states and applications to thermofield double states, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 066004 [arXiv:1709.00921] [INSPIRE].
R.-Q. Yang, C. Niu, C.-Y. Zhang and K.-Y. Kim, Comparison of holographic and field theoretic complexities for time dependent thermofield double states, JHEP 02 (2018) 082 [arXiv:1710.00600] [INSPIRE].
S. Chapman et al., Circuit complexity for thermofield double states, to appear, (2018).
D.W.F. Alves and G. Camilo, Evolution of complexity following a quantum quench in free field theory, arXiv:1804.00107 [INSPIRE].
H. Camargo, P. Caputa, D. Das, M.P. Heller and R. Jefferson, Entanglement is not enough: complexity as a novel probe of quantum quenches, in preparation.
P. Gao, D.L. Jafferis and A. Wall, Traversable wormholes via a double trace deformation, JHEP 12 (2017) 151 [arXiv:1608.05687] [INSPIRE].
J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Diving into traversable wormholes, Fortsch. Phys. 65 (2017) 1700034 [arXiv:1704.05333] [INSPIRE].
M. Miyaji, T. Numasawa, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, Distance between quantum states and gauge-gravity duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 261602 [arXiv:1507.07555] [INSPIRE].
A. Bhattacharyya, P. Caputa, S.R. Das, N. Kundu, M. Miyaji and T. Takayanagi, Path-integral complexity for perturbed CFTs, arXiv:1804.01999 [INSPIRE].
A. Reynolds and S.F. Ross, Divergences in holographic complexity, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 105004 [arXiv:1612.05439] [INSPIRE].
R. Emparan, C.V. Johnson and R.C. Myers, Surface terms as counterterms in the AdS/CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 104001 [hep-th/9903238] [INSPIRE].
S. de Haro, S.N. Solodukhin and K. Skenderis, Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS/CFT correspondence, Commun. Math. Phys. 217 (2001) 595 [hep-th/0002230] [INSPIRE].
K. Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067] [INSPIRE].
A. Buchel, J. Escobedo, R.C. Myers, M.F. Paulos, A. Sinha and M. Smolkin, Holographic GB gravity in arbitrary dimensions, JHEP 03 (2010) 111 [arXiv:0911.4257] [INSPIRE].
P.A. Cano, Lovelock action with nonsmooth boundaries, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 104048 [arXiv:1803.00172] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1805.07262
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chapman, S., Marrochio, H. & Myers, R.C. Holographic complexity in Vaidya spacetimes. Part II. J. High Energ. Phys. 2018, 114 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2018)114
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2018)114