Abstract
We revisit the phenomenology of quintessence models in light of the recently refined version of the de Sitter Swampland conjecture, which includes the possibility of unstable de Sitter critical points. We show that models of quintessence can evade previously derived lower bounds on (1 + w), albeit with very finely-tuned initial conditions. In the absence of such tuning or other rolling quintessence fields, a field with mass close to Hubble is required, which has a generic prediction for (1+ w). Slow-roll single field inflation models remain in tension. Other phenomenological constraints arising from the coupling of the quintessence field with the Higgs or the QCD axion are significantly relaxed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
C. Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland, hep-th/0509212 [INSPIRE].
T. Banks and N. Seiberg, Symmetries and strings in field theory and gravity, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 084019 [arXiv:1011.5120] [INSPIRE].
H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, On the geometry of the string landscape and the swampland, Nucl. Phys. B 766 (2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa, The string landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force, JHEP 06 (2007) 060 [hep-th/0601001] [INSPIRE].
H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Non-supersymmetric AdS and the swampland, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 21 (2017) 1787 [arXiv:1610.01533] [INSPIRE].
G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko and C. Vafa, De Sitter Space and the swampland, arXiv:1806.08362 [INSPIRE].
T.D. Brennan, F. Carta and C. Vafa, The string landscape, the swampland and the missing corner, PoS(TASI2017)015 [arXiv:1711.00864] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Maldacena and C. Núñez, Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16 (2001) 822 [hep-th/0007018] [INSPIRE].
M.P. Hertzberg, S. Kachru, W. Taylor and M. Tegmark, Inflationary Constraints on Type IIA String Theory, JHEP 12 (2007) 095 [arXiv:0711.2512] [INSPIRE].
T. Wrase and M. Zagermann, On classical de Sitter vacua in string theory, Fortsch. Phys. 58 (2010) 906 [arXiv:1003.0029] [INSPIRE].
E. Silverstein, (A)dS backgrounds from asymmetric orientifolds, Clay Mat. Proc. 1 (2002) 179 [hep-th/0106209] [INSPIRE].
A. Maloney, E. Silverstein and A. Strominger, de Sitter space in noncritical string theory, in the poroceedings of Workshop: The future of theoretical physics and cosmology: Celebrating Stephen Hawking’s 60th birthday, January 7-10, Cambridge, U.K. (2002), hep-th/0205316 [INSPIRE].
S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde and S.P. Trivedi, De Sitter vacua in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 046005 [hep-th/0301240] [INSPIRE].
M. Cicoli et al., De Sitter vs Quintessence in String Theory, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1800079 [arXiv:1808.08967] [INSPIRE].
Y. Akrami, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and V. Vardanyan, The landscape, the swampland and the era of precision cosmology, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1800075 [arXiv:1808.09440] [INSPIRE].
S. Kachru and S.P. Trivedi, A comment on effective field theories of flux vacua, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1800086 [arXiv:1808.08971] [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker and T. Wrase, The asymptotic dS swampland conjecture — A simplified derivation and a potential loophole, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1800097 [arXiv:1810.08182] [INSPIRE].
J.P. Conlon, The de Sitter swampland conjecture and supersymmetric AdS vacua, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 (2018) 1850178 [arXiv:1808.05040] [INSPIRE].
H. Murayama, M. Yamazaki and T.T. Yanagida, Do we live in the swampland?, JHEP 12 (2018) 032 [arXiv:1809.00478] [INSPIRE].
J. Blabäck, U. Danielsson and G. Dibitetto, A new light on the darkest corner of the landscape, arXiv:1810.11365 [INSPIRE].
S. Tsujikawa, Quintessence: a review, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 214003 [arXiv:1304.1961] [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P.J. Steinhardt and C. Vafa, On the cosmological implications of the string swampland, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 271 [arXiv:1806.09718] [INSPIRE].
A. Ashoorioon, Rescuing single field inflation from the swampland, Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 568 [arXiv:1810.04001] [INSPIRE].
M. Motaharfar, V. Kamali and R.O. Ramos, Warm inflation as a way out of the swampland, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 063513 [arXiv:1810.02816] [INSPIRE].
K. Dimopoulos, Steep eternal inflation and the swampland, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 123516 [arXiv:1810.03438] [INSPIRE].
C.-M. Lin, K.-W. Ng and K. Cheung, Chaotic inflation on the brane and the swampland criteria, arXiv:1810.01644 [INSPIRE].
S. Das, Note on single-field inflation and the swampland criteria, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 083510 [arXiv:1809.03962] [INSPIRE].
S. Brahma and M. Wali Hossain, Avoiding the string swampland in single-field inflation: Excited initial states, JHEP 03 (2019) 006 [arXiv:1809.01277] [INSPIRE].
C. Damian and O. Loaiza-Brito, Two-field axion inflation and the swampland constraint in the flux-scaling scenario, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1800072 [arXiv:1808.03397] [INSPIRE].
H. Matsui and F. Takahashi, Eternal inflation and swampland conjectures, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 023533 [arXiv:1807.11938] [INSPIRE].
A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, A note on Inflation and the Swampland, Fortsch. Phys. 66 (2018) 1800052 [arXiv:1807.05445] [INSPIRE].
A. Achúcarro and G.A. Palma, The string swampland constraints require multi-field inflation, JCAP 02 (2019) 041 [arXiv:1807.04390] [INSPIRE].
J.-L. Lehners, Small-field and scale-free: inflation and ekpyrosis at their extremes, JCAP 11 (2018) 001 [arXiv:1807.05240] [INSPIRE].
C.-M. Lin, Type I hilltop inflation and the refined swampland criteria, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 023519 [arXiv:1810.11992] [INSPIRE].
S.C. Park, Minimal gauge inflation and the refined Swampland conjecture, JCAP 01 (2019) 053 [arXiv:1810.11279] [INSPIRE].
I. Ben-Dayan, Draining the swampland, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 101301 [arXiv:1808.01615] [INSPIRE].
C.-I. Chiang and H. Murayama, Building supergravity quintessence model, arXiv:1808.02279 [INSPIRE].
S.-J. Wang, Electroweak relaxation of cosmological hierarchy, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 023529 [arXiv:1810.06445] [INSPIRE].
G. D’Amico, N. Kaloper and A. Lawrence, Strongly coupled quintessence, arXiv:1809.05109 [INSPIRE].
C. Han, S. Pi and M. Sasaki, Quintessence saves Higgs instability, Phys. Lett. B 791 (2019) 314 [arXiv:1809.05507] [INSPIRE].
Y. Olguin-Trejo, S.L. Parameswaran, G. Tasinato and I. Zavala, Runaway quintessence, out of the swampland, JCAP 01 (2019) 031 [arXiv:1810.08634] [INSPIRE].
F. Denef, A. Hebecker and T. Wrase, De Sitter swampland conjecture and the Higgs potential, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 086004 [arXiv:1807.06581] [INSPIRE].
K. Hamaguchi, M. Ibe and T. Moroi, The swampland conjecture and the Higgs expectation value, JHEP 12 (2018) 023 [arXiv:1810.02095] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and C. Gomez, On exclusion of positive cosmological constant, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1800092 [arXiv:1806.10877] [INSPIRE].
D. Andriot, On the de Sitter swampland criterion, Phys. Lett. B 785 (2018) 570 [arXiv:1806.10999] [INSPIRE].
S.K. Garg and C. Krishnan, Bounds on slow roll and the de Sitter swampland, arXiv:1807.05193 [INSPIRE].
H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa, Distance and de Sitter conjectures on the swampland, Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 180 [arXiv:1810.05506] [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso, A covariant entropy conjecture, JHEP 07 (1999) 004 [hep-th/9905177] [INSPIRE].
C. Roupec and T. Wrase, De Sitter extrema and the swampland, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1800082 [arXiv:1807.09538] [INSPIRE].
C. Caviezel, T. Wrase and M. Zagermann, Moduli stabilization and cosmology of type IIB on SU(2)-structure orientifolds, JHEP 04 (2010) 011 [arXiv:0912.3287] [INSPIRE].
R. Flauger, S. Paban, D. Robbins and T. Wrase, Searching for slow-roll moduli inflation in massive type IIA supergravity with metric fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 086011 [arXiv:0812.3886] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, arXiv:1807.06211 [INSPIRE].
D.M. Scolnic et al., The complete light-curve sample of spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and cosmological constraints from the combined pantheon sample, Astrophys. J. 859 (2018) 101 [arXiv:1710.00845] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13 [arXiv:1502.01589] [INSPIRE].
H. Fukuda, R. Saito, S. Shirai and M. Yamazaki, Phenomenological consequences of the refined swampland conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 083520 [arXiv:1810.06532] [INSPIRE].
S. Das, Warm inflation in the light of swampland criteria, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 063514 [arXiv:1810.05038] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1811.00554
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Agrawal, P., Obied, G. Dark energy and the refined de sitter conjecture. J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2019)103
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2019)103