Abstract
Light dark sectors in thermal contact with the Standard Model can naturally produce the observed relic dark matter abundance and are the targets of a broad experimental search program. A key light dark sector model is the pseudo-Dirac fermion with a dark photon mediator. The dynamics of the fermionic excited states are often neglected. We consider scenarios in which a nontrivial abundance of excited states is produced and their subsequent de-excitation yields interesting electromagnetic signals in direct detection experiments. We study three mechanisms of populating the excited state: a primordial excited fraction, a component up-scattered in the Sun, and a component up-scattered in the Earth. We find that the fractional abundance of primordial excited states is generically depleted to exponentially small fractions in the early universe. Nonetheless, this abundance can produce observable signals in current dark matter searches. MeV-scale dark matter with thermal cross sections and higher can be probed by down-scattering following excitation in the Sun. Up-scatters of GeV-scale dark matter in the Earth can give rise to signals in current and upcoming terrestrial experiments and X-ray observations. We comment on the possible relevance of these scenarios to the recent excess in XENON1T.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J. Alexander et al., Dark Sectors 2016 Workshop: Community Report, arXiv:1608.08632 [INSPIRE].
N. Padmanabhan and D.P. Finkbeiner, Detecting dark matter annihilation with CMB polarization: Signatures and experimental prospects, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 023508 [astro-ph/0503486] [INSPIRE].
T.R. Slatyer, N. Padmanabhan and D.P. Finkbeiner, CMB Constraints on WIMP Annihilation: Energy Absorption During the Recombination Epoch, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 043526 [arXiv:0906.1197] [INSPIRE].
M.S. Madhavacheril, N. Sehgal and T.R. Slatyer, Current Dark Matter Annihilation Constraints from CMB and Low-Redshift Data, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 103508 [arXiv:1310.3815] [INSPIRE].
D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Inelastic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 043502 [hep-ph/0101138] [INSPIRE].
D.P. Finkbeiner, T.R. Slatyer, N. Weiner and I. Yavin, PAMELA, DAMA, INTEGRAL and Signatures of Metastable Excited WIMPs, JCAP 09 (2009) 037 [arXiv:0903.1037] [INSPIRE].
B. Batell, M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Direct Detection of Multi-component Secluded WIMPs, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 115019 [arXiv:0903.3396] [INSPIRE].
R.F. Lang and N. Weiner, Peaked Signals from Dark Matter Velocity Structures in Direct Detection Experiments, JCAP 06 (2010) 032 [arXiv:1003.3664] [INSPIRE].
P.W. Graham, R. Harnik, S. Rajendran and P. Saraswat, Exothermic Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 063512 [arXiv:1004.0937] [INSPIRE].
D.P. Finkbeiner, T. Lin and N. Weiner, Inelastic Dark Matter and DAMA/LIBRA: An Experimentum Crucis, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 115008 [arXiv:0906.0002] [INSPIRE].
S. Chang, N. Weiner and I. Yavin, Magnetic Inelastic Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 125011 [arXiv:1007.4200] [INSPIRE].
B. Feldstein, P.W. Graham and S. Rajendran, Luminous Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 075019 [arXiv:1008.1988] [INSPIRE].
D.E. Morrissey and A.P. Spray, New Limits on Light Hidden Sectors from Fixed-Target Experiments, JHEP 06 (2014) 083 [arXiv:1402.4817] [INSPIRE].
E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic and B. Shuve, Discovering Inelastic Thermal-Relic Dark Matter at Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 063523 [arXiv:1508.03050] [INSPIRE].
E. Izaguirre, Y. Kahn, G. Krnjaic and M. Moschella, Testing Light Dark Matter Coannihilation With Fixed-Target Experiments, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 055007 [arXiv:1703.06881] [INSPIRE].
A. Berlin and F. Kling, Inelastic Dark Matter at the LHC Lifetime Frontier: ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, CODEX-b, FASER, and MATHUSLA, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 015021 [arXiv:1810.01879] [INSPIRE].
E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster and N. Toro, Analyzing the Discovery Potential for Light Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 251301 [arXiv:1505.00011] [INSPIRE].
P.J. Fox, G. Jung, P. Sorensen and N. Weiner, Dark Matter in Light of the LUX Results, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 103526 [arXiv:1401.0216] [INSPIRE].
M.T. Frandsen and I.M. Shoemaker, Up-shot of inelastic down-scattering at CDMS-Si, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 051701 [arXiv:1401.0624] [INSPIRE].
N. Bernal, X. Chu and J. Pradler, Simply split strongly interacting massive particles, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 115023 [arXiv:1702.04906] [INSPIRE].
I.M. Bloch, A. Caputo, R. Essig, D. Redigolo, M. Sholapurkar and T. Volansky, Exploring new physics with O(keV) electron recoils in direct detection experiments, JHEP 01 (2021) 178 [arXiv:2006.14521] [INSPIRE].
M. Carrillo González and N. Toro, Cosmology and signals of light pseudo-Dirac dark matter, JHEP 04 (2022) 060 [arXiv:2108.13422] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig, J. Mardon and T. Volansky, Direct Detection of Sub-GeV Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 076007 [arXiv:1108.5383] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig, M. Fernandez-Serra, J. Mardon, A. Soto, T. Volansky and T.-T. Yu, Direct Detection of sub-GeV Dark Matter with Semiconductor Targets, JHEP 05 (2016) 046 [arXiv:1509.01598] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig, T. Volansky and T.-T. Yu, New Constraints and Prospects for sub-GeV Dark Matter Scattering off Electrons in Xenon, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 043017 [arXiv:1703.00910] [INSPIRE].
SENSEI collaboration, SENSEI: Direct-Detection Results on sub-GeV Dark Matter from a New Skipper-CCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 171802 [arXiv:2004.11378] [INSPIRE].
DAMIC collaboration, Constraints on Light Dark Matter Particles Interacting with Electrons from DAMIC at SNOLAB, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 181802 [arXiv:1907.12628] [INSPIRE].
LUX collaboration, First Searches for Axions and Axionlike Particles with the LUX Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 261301 [arXiv:1704.02297] [INSPIRE].
PandaX-II collaboration, Constraining Dark Matter Models with a Light Mediator at the PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 021304 [arXiv:1802.06912] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Light Dark Matter Search with Ionization Signals in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 251801 [arXiv:1907.11485] [INSPIRE].
PandaX collaboration, Limits on Axion Couplings from the First 80 Days of Data of the PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181806 [arXiv:1707.07921] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Excess electronic recoil events in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 072004 [arXiv:2006.09721] [INSPIRE].
B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts, Phys. Lett. B 166 (1986) 196 [INSPIRE].
C. Boehm and P. Fayet, Scalar dark matter candidates, Nucl. Phys. B 683 (2004) 219 [hep-ph/0305261] [INSPIRE].
D.P. Finkbeiner and N. Weiner, Exciting Dark Matter and the INTEGRAL/SPI 511 keV signal, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 083519 [astro-ph/0702587] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, D.P. Finkbeiner, T.R. Slatyer and N. Weiner, A Theory of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015014 [arXiv:0810.0713] [INSPIRE].
M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Astrophysical Signatures of Secluded Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 391 [arXiv:0810.1502] [INSPIRE].
D. Hooper and K.M. Zurek, A Natural Supersymmetric Model with MeV Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 087302 [arXiv:0801.3686] [INSPIRE].
S. Knapen, T. Lin and K.M. Zurek, Light Dark Matter: Models and Constraints, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 115021 [arXiv:1709.07882] [INSPIRE].
T. Cohen, D.J. Phalen, A. Pierce and K.M. Zurek, Asymmetric Dark Matter from a GeV Hidden Sector, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 056001 [arXiv:1005.1655] [INSPIRE].
Y. Ema, F. Sala and R. Sato, Dark matter models for the 511 keV galactic line predict keV electron recoils on Earth, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 129 [arXiv:2007.09105] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig, A. Manalaysay, J. Mardon, P. Sorensen and T. Volansky, First Direct Detection Limits on sub-GeV Dark Matter from XENON10, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 021301 [arXiv:1206.2644] [INSPIRE].
B.M. Roberts, V.A. Dzuba, V.V. Flambaum, M. Pospelov and Y.V. Stadnik, Dark matter scattering on electrons: Accurate calculations of atomic excitations and implications for the DAMA signal, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 115037 [arXiv:1604.04559] [INSPIRE].
R. Catena, T. Emken, N.A. Spaldin and W. Tarantino, Atomic responses to general dark matter-electron interactions, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 033195 [arXiv:1912.08204] [INSPIRE].
S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure, Phys. Rept. 730 (2018) 1 [arXiv:1705.02358] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [Erratum ibid. 652 (2021) C4] [arXiv:1807.06209] [INSPIRE].
D. Banerjee et al., Dark matter search in missing energy events with NA64, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 121801 [arXiv:1906.00176] [INSPIRE].
BaBar collaboration, Search for Invisible Decays of a Dark Photon Produced in e+e− Collisions at BaBar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 131804 [arXiv:1702.03327] [INSPIRE].
E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster and N. Toro, Testing GeV-Scale Dark Matter with Fixed-Target Missing Momentum Experiments, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 094026 [arXiv:1411.1404] [INSPIRE].
M. Battaglieri et al., US Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter 2017: Community Report, in U.S. Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter, (2017) [arXiv:1707.04591] [INSPIRE].
LDMX collaboration, Light Dark Matter eXperiment (LDMX), arXiv:1808.05219 [INSPIRE].
A. Berlin, N. Blinov, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster and N. Toro, Dark Matter, Millicharges, Axion and Scalar Particles, Gauge Bosons, and Other New Physics with LDMX, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 075001 [arXiv:1807.01730] [INSPIRE].
H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler and A. Ritz, Directly Detecting MeV-scale Dark Matter via Solar Reflection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 141801 [Erratum ibid. 121 (2018) 259903] [arXiv:1708.03642] [INSPIRE].
J.N. Bahcall, M.H. Pinsonneault and S. Basu, Solar models: Current epoch and time dependences, neutrinos, and helioseismological properties, Astrophys. J. 555 (2001) 990 [astro-ph/0010346] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Energy resolution and linearity of XENON1T in the MeV energy range, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 785 [arXiv:2003.03825] [INSPIRE].
D.P. Finkbeiner and N. Weiner, X-ray line from exciting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 083002 [arXiv:1402.6671] [INSPIRE].
F. D’Eramo, K. Hambleton, S. Profumo and T. Stefaniak, Dark matter inelastic up-scattering with the interstellar plasma: A new source of x-ray lines, including at 3.5 keV, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 103011 [arXiv:1603.04859] [INSPIRE].
E. Bulbul, M. Markevitch, A. Foster, R.K. Smith, M. Loewenstein and S.W. Randall, Detection of An Unidentified Emission Line in the Stacked X-ray spectrum of Galaxy Clusters, Astrophys. J. 789 (2014) 13 [arXiv:1402.2301] [INSPIRE].
A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy, D. Iakubovskyi and J. Franse, Unidentified Line in X-Ray Spectra of the Andromeda Galaxy and Perseus Galaxy Cluster, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 251301 [arXiv:1402.4119] [INSPIRE].
S.W. Allen, A.C. Fabian, R.M. Johnstone, P.E.J. Nulsen and A.C. Edge, GINGA and EXOSAT observations of the Perseus cluster of galaxies, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 254 (1992) 51.
J. Eby, P.J. Fox, R. Harnik and G.D. Kribs, Luminous Signals of Inelastic Dark Matter in Large Detectors, JHEP 09 (2019) 115 [arXiv:1904.09994] [INSPIRE].
M. Pospelov, N. Weiner and I. Yavin, Dark matter detection in two easy steps, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 055008 [arXiv:1312.1363] [INSPIRE].
T. Lin and D.P. Finkbeiner, Magnetic Inelastic Dark Matter: Directional Signals Without a Directional Detector, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 083510 [arXiv:1011.3052] [INSPIRE].
CRESST collaboration, First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 102002 [arXiv:1904.00498] [INSPIRE].
A. Moretti et al., Spectrum of the unresolved cosmic X ray background: what is unresolved 50 years after its discovery, Astron. Astrophys. 548 (2012) A87 [arXiv:1210.6377] [INSPIRE].
F. Perez and B.E. Granger, IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9 (2007) 21 [INSPIRE].
T. Kluyver et al., Jupyter notebooks — a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows, in Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands (2016) [DOI].
J.D. Hunter, Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9 (2007) 90 [INSPIRE].
S. van der Walt, S.C. Colbert and G. Varoquaux, The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation, Comput. Sci. Eng. 13 (2011) 22 [arXiv:1102.1523] [INSPIRE].
M. Waskom et al., mwaskom/seaborn: v0.8.1 (September 2017), 10.5281/zenodo.883859 (2017).
P. Virtanen et al., SciPy 1.0 — Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Nature Meth. 17 (2020) 261 [arXiv:1907.10121] [INSPIRE].
C.O. da Costa-Luis, tqdm: A fast, extensible progress meter for python and cli, J. Open Source Softw. 4 (2019) 1277.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2006.13918
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Baryakhtar, M., Berlin, A., Liu, H. et al. Electromagnetic signals of inelastic dark matter scattering. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 47 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2022)047
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2022)047