Abstract
As the continuum limit is approached, lattice QCD simulations tend to get trapped in the topological charge sectors of field space and may consequently give biased results in practice. We propose to bypass this problem by imposing open (Neumann) boundary conditions on the gauge field in the time direction. The topological charge can then flow in and out of the lattice, while many properties of the theory (the hadron spectrum, for example) are not affected. Extensive simulations of the SU(3) gauge theory, using the HMC and the closely related SMD algorithm, confirm the absence of topology barriers if these boundary conditions are chosen. Moreover, the calculated autocorrelation times are found to scale approximately like the square of the inverse lattice spacing, thus supporting the conjecture that the HMC algorithm is in the universality class of the Langevin equation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
M. Lüscher, Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, JHEP 08 (2010) 071 [arXiv:1006.4518] [SPIRES].
L. Del Debbio, H. Panagopoulos and E. Vicari, θ-dependence of SU(N) gauge theories, JHEP 08 (2002) 044 [hep-th/0204125] [SPIRES].
S. Schaefer, R. Sommer and F. Virotta, Investigating the critical slowing down of QCD simulations, PoS LAT2009 (2009) 032 [arXiv:0910.1465] [SPIRES].
S. Schaefer, R. Sommer and F. Virotta, Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations, Nucl. Phys. B 845 (2011) 93 [arXiv:1009.5228] [SPIRES].
M. Lüscher, Topology, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, PoS Lattice 2010 (2010) 015 [arXiv:1009.5877] [SPIRES].
S. Duane, A.D. Kennedy, B.J. Pendleton and D. Roweth, Hybrid Monte Carlo, Phys. Lett. B 195 (1987) 216 [SPIRES].
M. Lüscher and S. Schaefer, Non-renormalizability of the HMC algorithm, JHEP 04 (2011) 104 [arXiv:1103.1810] [SPIRES].
J. Zinn-Justin, Renormalization and stochastic quantization, Nucl. Phys. B 275 (1986) 135 [SPIRES].
J. Zinn-Justin and D. Zwanziger, Ward identities for the stochastic quantization of gauge fields, Nucl. Phys. B 295 (1988) 297 [SPIRES].
M. Lüscher, R. Narayanan, P. Weisz and U. Wolff, The Schrödinger functional: A renormalizable probe for non-Abelian gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 384 (1992) 168 [hep-lat/9207009] [SPIRES].
S. Sint, On the Schrödinger functional in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 421 (1994) 135 [hep-lat/9312079] [SPIRES].
M. Lüscher, The Schrödinger functional in lattice QCD with exact chiral symmetry, JHEP 05 (2006) 042 [hep-lat/0603029] [SPIRES].
K. Symanzik, Schrödinger representation and Casimir effect in renormalizable quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 190 (1981) 1 [SPIRES].
M. Lüscher and P. Weisz, O(a) improvement of the axial current in lattice QCD to one-loop order of perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B 479 (1996) 429 [hep-lat/9606016] [SPIRES].
M. Lüscher, Construction of a selfadjoint, strictly positive transfer matrix for Euclidean lattice gauge theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 54 (1977) 283 [SPIRES].
B. Sheikholeslami and R. Wohlert, Improved continuum limit lattice action for QCD with Wilson fermions, Nucl. Phys. B 259 (1985) 572 [SPIRES].
M. Lüscher, S. Sint, R. Sommer and P. Weisz, Chiral symmetry and O(a) improvement in lattice QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 478 (1996) 365 [hep-lat/9605038] [SPIRES].
Y. Taniguchi, Schrödinger functional formalism with Ginsparg-Wilson fermion, JHEP 12 (2005) 037 [hep-lat/0412024] [SPIRES].
Y. Taniguchi, Schrödinger functional formalism with domain-wall fermion, JHEP 10 (2006) 027 [hep-lat/0604002] [SPIRES].
A.M. Horowitz, Stochastic quantization in phase space, Phys. Lett. B 156 (1985) 89 [SPIRES].
A.M. Horowitz, The second order Langevin equation and numerical simulations, Nucl. Phys. B 280 (1987) 510 [SPIRES].
A.M. Horowitz, A generalized guided Monte Carlo algorithm, Phys. Lett. B 268 (1991) 247 [SPIRES].
A.D. Kennedy and B. Pendleton, Cost of the generalised Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for free field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 607 (2001) 456 [hep-lat/0008020] [SPIRES].
I.P. Omelyan, I.M. Mryglod, R. Folk, Symplectic analytically integrable decomposition algorithms: classification, derivation, and application to molecular dynamics, quantum and celestial mechanics simulations, Comp. Phys. Commun. 151 (2003) 272.
K. Jansen and C. Liu, Kramers equation algorithm for simulations of QCD with two flavors of Wilson fermions and gauge group SU(2), Nucl. Phys. B 453 (1995) 375 [hep-lat/9506020] [SPIRES].
M. Lüscher and P. Weisz, Perturbative analysis of the gradient flow in non-abelian gauge theories, JHEP 02 (2011) 051 [arXiv:1101.0963] [SPIRES].
R. Sommer, A New way to set the energy scale in lattice gauge theories and its applications to the static force and αs in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B 411 (1994) 839 [hep-lat/9310022] [SPIRES].
S. Necco and R. Sommer, The N f =0 heavy quark potential from short to intermediate distances, Nucl. Phys. B 622 (2002) 328 [hep-lat/0108008] [SPIRES].
A. Ukawa and M. Fukugita, Langevin simulation including dynamical quark loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 1854 [SPIRES].
G.G. Batrouni et al., Langevin simulations of lattice field theories, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 2736 [SPIRES].
N. Madras and A.D. Sokal, The pivot algorithm: a highly efficient Monte Carlo method for selfavoiding walk, J. Statist. Phys. 50 (1988) 109 [SPIRES].
M. Lüscher, Schwarz-preconditioned HMC algorithm for two-flavour lattice QCD, Comput. Phys. Commun. 165 (2005) 199 [hep-lat/0409106] [SPIRES].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1105.4749
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Lüscher, M., Schaefer, S. Lattice QCD without topology barriers. J. High Energ. Phys. 2011, 36 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2011)036
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2011)036