Abstract
In this paper, we summarize phenomenology in lepton portal dark matter (DM) models, where DM couples to leptons and extra leptons/sleptons. There are several possible setups: a DM field is either a complex/real scalar or a Dirac/Majorana fermion, and chiralities of leptons that couple to the DM are different according to the spin of the DM. We discuss the prediction of each model and compare it with the latest experimental constraints from the DM detections, the LHC, and the flavor experiments. We also propose simple setups to resolve the discrepancy in the anomalous magnetic moment of muon.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380] [INSPIRE].
J.R. Ellis, K.A. Olive, Y. Santoso and V.C. Spanos, Supersymmetric dark matter in light of WMAP, Phys. Lett. B 565 (2003) 176 [hep-ph/0303043] [INSPIRE].
G. Servant and T.M.P. Tait, Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate?, Nucl. Phys. B 650 (2003) 391 [hep-ph/0206071] [INSPIRE].
H.-C. Cheng, J.L. Feng and K.T. Matchev, Kaluza-Klein dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 211301 [hep-ph/0207125] [INSPIRE].
A. Arhrib, Y.-L.S. Tsai, Q. Yuan and T.-C. Yuan, An updated analysis of inert Higgs doublet model in light of the recent results from LUX, PLANCK, AMS-02 and LHC, JCAP 06 (2014) 030 [arXiv:1310.0358] [INSPIRE].
A. Goudelis, B. Herrmann and O. St°al, Dark matter in the inert doublet model after the discovery of a Higgs-like boson at the LHC, JHEP 09 (2013) 106 [arXiv:1303.3010] [INSPIRE].
A. Ilnicka, M. Krawczyk and T. Robens, Inert doublet model in light of LHC Run I and astrophysical data, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 055026 [arXiv:1508.01671] [INSPIRE].
M.A. Díaz, B. Koch and S. Urrutia-Quiroga, Constraints to dark matter from inert Higgs doublet model, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2016 (2016) 8278375 [arXiv:1511.04429] [INSPIRE].
A. Belyaev, G. Cacciapaglia, I.P. Ivanov, F. Rojas-Abatte and M. Thomas, Anatomy of the inert two Higgs doublet model in the light of the LHC and non-LHC dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 035011 [arXiv:1612.00511] [INSPIRE].
S. Kanemura, S. Matsumoto, T. Nabeshima and N. Okada, Can WIMP dark matter overcome the nightmare scenario?, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 055026 [arXiv:1005.5651] [INSPIRE].
A. Djouadi, O. Lebedev, Y. Mambrini and J. Quevillon, Implications of LHC searches for Higgs-portal dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 65 [arXiv:1112.3299] [INSPIRE].
A. Djouadi, A. Falkowski, Y. Mambrini and J. Quevillon, Direct detection of Higgs-portal dark matter at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2455 [arXiv:1205.3169] [INSPIRE].
M. Escudero, A. Berlin, D. Hooper and M.-X. Lin, Toward (finally!) ruling out Z and Higgs mediated dark matter models, JCAP 12 (2016) 029 [arXiv:1609.09079] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, A. Fowlie, L. Marzola and M. Raidal, Statistical analyses of Higgs- and Z-portal dark matter models, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 115014 [arXiv:1711.09912] [INSPIRE].
P. Athron, J.M. Cornell, F. Kahlhoefer, J. McKay, P. Scott and S. Wild, Impact of vacuum stability, perturbativity and XENON1T on global fits of ℤ2 and ℤ3 scalar singlet dark matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 830 [arXiv:1806.11281] [INSPIRE].
S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, Effective WIMPs, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 015011 [arXiv:1307.8120] [INSPIRE].
Y. Bai and J. Berger, Fermion portal dark matter, JHEP 11 (2013) 171 [arXiv:1308.0612] [INSPIRE].
Y. Bai and J. Berger, Lepton portal dark matter, JHEP 08 (2014) 153 [arXiv:1402.6696] [INSPIRE].
S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, Leptophilic effective WIMPs, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 015011 [arXiv:1402.7358] [INSPIRE].
M. Garny, A. Ibarra, S. Rydbeck and S. Vogl, Majorana dark matter with a coloured mediator: collider vs. direct and indirect searches, JHEP 06 (2014) 169 [arXiv:1403.4634] [INSPIRE].
A. Ibarra and S. Wild, Dirac dark matter with a charged mediator: a comprehensive one-loop analysis of the direct detection phenomenology, JCAP 05 (2015) 047 [arXiv:1503.03382] [INSPIRE].
B. Bhattacharya, D. London, J.M. Cline, A. Datta and G. Dupuis, Quark-flavored scalar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 115012 [arXiv:1509.04271] [INSPIRE].
T. Abe, J. Kawamura, S. Okawa and Y. Omura, Dark matter physics, flavor physics and LHC constraints in the dark matter model with a bottom partner, JHEP 03 (2017) 058 [arXiv:1612.01643] [INSPIRE].
S. Baek, P. Ko and P. Wu, Top-philic scalar dark matter with a vector-like fermionic top partner, JHEP 10 (2016) 117 [arXiv:1606.00072] [INSPIRE].
S. Baek, P. Ko and P. Wu, Heavy quark-philic scalar dark matter with a vector-like fermion portal, JCAP 07 (2018) 008 [arXiv:1709.00697] [INSPIRE].
M. Blanke and S. Kast, Top-flavoured dark matter in dark minimal flavour violation, JHEP 05 (2017) 162 [arXiv:1702.08457] [INSPIRE].
J. Kawamura, S. Okawa and Y. Omura, Interplay between the b→ sℓℓ anomalies and dark matter physics, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 075041 [arXiv:1706.04344] [INSPIRE].
S. Colucci, B. Fuks, F. Giacchino, L. Lopez Honorez, M.H.G. Tytgat and J. Vandecasteele, Top-philic vector-like portal to scalar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 035002 [arXiv:1804.05068] [INSPIRE].
J. Kawamura, S. Okawa, Y. Omura and Y. Tang, WIMP dark matter in the parity solution to the strong CP problem, JHEP 04 (2019) 162 [arXiv:1812.07004] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [INSPIRE].
M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to α(m2 ), Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 241 [Erratum ibid. 80 (2020) 410] [arXiv:1908.00921] [INSPIRE].
A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, g − 2 of charged leptons, \( \alpha \left({M}_Z^2\right) \) and the hyperfine splitting of muonium, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 014029 [arXiv:1911.00367] [INSPIRE].
RBC, UKQCD collaboration, Calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 022003 [arXiv:1801.07224] [INSPIRE].
A. Gérardin et al., The leading hadronic contribution to (g − 2)μ from lattice QCD with Nf = 2 + 1 flavours of O(a) improved Wilson quarks, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 014510 [arXiv:1904.03120] [INSPIRE].
Fermilab Lattice, LATTICE-HPQCD, MILC collaboration, Hadronic-vacuum-polarization contribution to the muon’s anomalous magnetic moment from four-flavor lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 034512 [arXiv:1902.04223] [INSPIRE].
D. Giusti, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, F. Sanfilippo and S. Simula, Electromagnetic and strong isospin-breaking corrections to the muon g − 2 from Lattice QCD+QED, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 114502 [arXiv:1901.10462] [INSPIRE].
S. Borsányi et al., Leading-order hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon magnetic momentfrom lattice QCD, arXiv:2002.12347 [INSPIRE].
T. Blum et al., Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 132002 [arXiv:1911.08123] [INSPIRE].
A. Gérardin et al., Hadronic light-by-light scattering amplitudes from lattice QCD versus dispersive sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 074501 [arXiv:1712.00421] [INSPIRE].
J. Green, O. Gryniuk, G. von Hippel, H.B. Meyer and V. Pascalutsa, Lattice QCD calculation of hadronic light-by-light scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 222003 [arXiv:1507.01577] [INSPIRE].
H.B. Meyer and H. Wittig, Lattice QCD and the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104 (2019) 46 [arXiv:1807.09370] [INSPIRE].
F. Campanario et al., Standard model radiative corrections in the pion form factor measurements do not explain the aμ anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 076004 [arXiv:1903.10197] [INSPIRE].
J. Kopp, L. Michaels and J. Smirnov, Loopy constraints on leptophilic dark matter and internal bremsstrahlung, JCAP 04 (2014) 022 [arXiv:1401.6457] [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko and C.B. Verhaaren, Leptophilic dark matter and the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, JHEP 08 (2014) 147 [arXiv:1402.7369] [INSPIRE].
K. Kowalska and E.M. Sessolo, Expectations for the muon g − 2 in simplified models with dark matter, JHEP 09 (2017) 112 [arXiv:1707.00753] [INSPIRE].
L. Calibbi, R. Ziegler and J. Zupan, Minimal models for dark matter and the muon g – 2 anomaly, JHEP 07 (2018) 046 [arXiv:1804.00009] [INSPIRE].
K. Fukushima and J. Kumar, Dipole moment bounds on dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 056017 [arXiv:1307.7120] [INSPIRE].
R. Dermisek and A. Raval, Explanation of the muon g − 2 anomaly with vectorlike leptons and its implications for Higgs decays, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 013017 [arXiv:1305.3522] [INSPIRE].
F. Jegerlehner and A. Nyffeler, The muon g − 2, Phys. Rept. 477 (2009) 1 [arXiv:0902.3360] [INSPIRE].
K.R. Lynch, A note on one loop electroweak contributions to g − 2: a companion to BUHEP-01-16, hep-ph/0108081 [INSPIRE].
H. Davoudiasl and W.J. Marciano, Tale of two anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 075011 [arXiv:1806.10252] [INSPIRE].
J. Kawamura, S. Raby and A. Trautner, Complete vectorlike fourth family and new U(1)’ for muon anomalies,x Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 055030 [arXiv:1906.11297] [INSPIRE].
A.E. Cárcamo Hernández, S.F. King, H. Lee and S.J. Rowley, Is it possible to explain the muon and electron g − 2 in a Z ’ model?, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 11 [arXiv:1910.10734] [INSPIRE].
J. Kawamura, S. Raby and A. Trautner, Complete vectorlike fourth family with U(1)’: a global analysis, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 035026 [arXiv:1911.11075] [INSPIRE].
G.F. Giudice, P. Paradisi and M. Passera, Testing new physics with the electron g − 2, JHEP 11 (2012) 113 [arXiv:1208.6583] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, Combined explanations of (g − 2) μ, e and implications for a large muon EDM, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 113002 [arXiv:1807.11484] [INSPIRE].
J. Liu, C.E.M. Wagner and X.-P. Wang, A light complex scalar for the electron and muon anomalous magnetic moments, JHEP 03 (2019) 008 [arXiv:1810.11028] [INSPIRE].
B. Dutta and Y. Mimura, Electron g − 2 with flavor violation in MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 563 [arXiv:1811.10209] [INSPIRE].
R.H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey and H. Müller, Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model, Science 360 (2018) 191 [arXiv:1812.04130] [INSPIRE].
X.-F. Han, T. Li, L. Wang and Y. Zhang, Simple interpretations of lepton anomalies in the lepton-specific inert two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 095034 [arXiv:1812.02449] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo and W. Yin, Explaining electron and muon g − 2 anomaly in SUSY without lepton-flavor mixings, JHEP 08 (2019) 122 [arXiv:1906.08768] [INSPIRE].
M. Abdullah, B. Dutta, S. Ghosh and T. Li, (g − 2)μ,e and the ANITA anomalous events in a three-loop neutrino mass model, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 115006 [arXiv:1907.08109] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel and A. Thamm, Axion-like particles, lepton-flavor violation and a new explanation of aμ and ae , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 211803 [arXiv:1908.00008] [INSPIRE].
C. Cornella, P. Paradisi and O. Sumensari, Hunting for ALPs with lepton flavor violation, JHEP 01 (2020) 158 [arXiv:1911.06279] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct stau production in events with two hadronic τ -leptons in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 032009 [arXiv:1911.06660] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Searches for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles with compressed mass spectra in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052005 [arXiv:1911.12606] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 123 [arXiv:1908.08215] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in events with τ leptons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 11 (2018) 151 [arXiv:1807.02048].
CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetric partners of electrons and muons in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 140 [arXiv:1806.05264] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for direct τ slepton pair production in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, CMS-PAS-SUS-18-006 (2018).
G. Bozzi, B. Fuks and M. Klasen, Threshold resummation for slepton-pair production at hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B 777 (2007) 157 [hep-ph/0701202] [INSPIRE].
B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D.R. Lamprea and M. Rothering, Precision predictions for electroweak superpartner production at hadron colliders with Resummino, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2480 [arXiv:1304.0790] [INSPIRE].
B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D.R. Lamprea and M. Rothering, Revisiting slepton pair production at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP 01 (2014) 168 [arXiv:1310.2621] [INSPIRE].
J. Fiaschi and M. Klasen, Neutralino-chargino pair production at NLO+NLL with resummation-improved parton density functions for LHC Run II, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 055014 [arXiv:1805.11322] [INSPIRE].
W. Beenakker, M. Klasen, M. Krämer, T. Plehn, M. Spira and P.M. Zerwas, The production of charginos/neutralinos and sleptons at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3780 [Erratum ibid. 100 (2008) 029901] [hep-ph/9906298] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer and T. Reiter, UFO — The Universal FeynRules Output, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 1201 [arXiv:1108.2040] [INSPIRE].
N.D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules — Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1614 [arXiv:0806.4194] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Searches for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles with compressed mass spectra in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052005 [arXiv:1911.12606].
A. Birkedal, K.T. Matchev, M. Perelstein and A. Spray, Robust gamma ray signature of WIMP dark matter, hep-ph/0507194 [INSPIRE].
T. Bringmann, X. Huang, A. Ibarra, S. Vogl and C. Weniger, Fermi LAT search for internal Bremsstrahlung signatures from dark matter annihilation, JCAP 07 (2012) 054 [arXiv:1203.1312] [INSPIRE].
M. Garny, A. Ibarra, M. Pato and S. Vogl, Internal Bremsstrahlung signatures in light of direct dark matter searches, JCAP 12 (2013) 046 [arXiv:1306.6342] [INSPIRE].
F. Giacchino, L. Lopez-Honorez and M.H.G. Tytgat, Scalar dark matter models with significant internal Bremsstrahlung, JCAP 10 (2013) 025 [arXiv:1307.6480] [INSPIRE].
T. Toma, Internal Bremsstrahlung signature of real scalar dark matter and consistency with thermal relic density, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 091301 [arXiv:1307.6181] [INSPIRE].
F. Giacchino, L. Lopez-Honorez and M.H.G. Tytgat, Bremsstrahlung and gamma ray lines in 3 Scenarios of dark matter annihilation, JCAP 08 (2014) 046 [arXiv:1405.6921] [INSPIRE].
A. Ibarra, T. Toma, M. Totzauer and S. Wild, Sharp gamma-ray spectral features from scalar dark matter annihilations, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 043526 [arXiv:1405.6917] [INSPIRE].
G.B. Gelmini, P. Gondolo and E. Roulet, Neutralino dark matter searches, Nucl. Phys. B 351 (1991) 623 [INSPIRE].
J. Edsjo and P. Gondolo, Neutralino relic density including coannihilations, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 1879 [hep-ph/9704361] [INSPIRE].
G. B́elanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs4.1: two dark matter candidates, Comput. Phys. Commun. 192 (2015) 322 [arXiv:1407.6129] [INSPIRE].
M. Garny, A. Ibarra and S. Vogl, Antiproton constraints on dark matter annihilations from internal electroweak bremsstrahlung, JCAP 07 (2011) 028 [arXiv:1105.5367] [INSPIRE].
M. Garny, A. Ibarra and S. Vogl, Dark matter annihilations into two light fermions and one gauge boson: General analysis and antiproton constraints, JCAP 04 (2012) 033 [arXiv:1112.5155] [INSPIRE].
A.M. Galper et al., Status of the GAMMA-400 project, Adv. Space Res. 51 (2013) 297 [arXiv:1201.2490] [INSPIRE].
CTA Consortium collaboration, Design concepts for the Cherenkov Telescope Array CTA: an advanced facility for ground-based high-energy gamma-ray astronomy, Exper. Astron. 32 (2011) 193 [arXiv:1008.3703] [INSPIRE].
Fermi-LAT collaboration, Searching for dark matter annihilation from Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with six years of Fermi Large Area Telescope data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 231301 [arXiv:1503.02641] [INSPIRE].
L. Bergstrom, T. Bringmann, I. Cholis, D. Hooper and C. Weniger, New limits on dark matter annihilation from AMS cosmic ray positron data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 171101 [arXiv:1306.3983] [INSPIRE].
L.A. Cavasonza, H. Gast, M. Krämer, M. Pellen and S. Schael, Constraints on leptophilic dark matter from the AMS-02 experiment, Astrophys. J. 839 (2017) 36 [Erratum ibid. 869 (2018) 89] [arXiv:1612.06634] [INSPIRE].
AMS collaboration, First result from the alpha magnetic spectrometer on the international space station: precision measurement of the positron fraction in primary cosmic rays of 0.5–350 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 141102 [INSPIRE].
A. Albert et al., Results from the search for dark matter in the Milky Way with 9 years of data of the ANTARES neutrino telescope, Phys. Lett. B 769 (2017) 249 [Erratum ibid. 796 (2019) 253] [arXiv:1612.04595] [INSPIRE].
ANTARES collaboration, Search for dark matter towards the Galactic Centre with 11 years of ANTARES data, Phys. Lett. B 805 (2020) 135439 [arXiv:1912.05296] [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, Search for neutrinos from dark matter self-annihilations in the center of the Milky Way with 3 years of IceCube/DeepCore, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 627 [arXiv:1705.08103] [INSPIRE].
J. Kopp, V. Niro, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, DAMA/LIBRA and leptonically interacting Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 083502 [arXiv:0907.3159] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig, T. Volansky and T.-T. Yu, New constraints and prospects for sub-GeV dark matter scattering off electrons in Xenon, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 043017 [arXiv:1703.00910] [INSPIRE].
M.K. Pandey et al., Constraints on spin-independent dark matter scattering off electrons with germanium and xenon detectors, arXiv:1812.11759 [INSPIRE].
D. Baxter, Y. Kahn and G. Krnjaic, Electron ionization via dark matter-electron scattering and the Migdal effect, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 076014 [arXiv:1908.00012] [INSPIRE].
DarkSide collaboration, Constraints on Sub-GeV dark-matter-electron scattering from the DarkSide-50 experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111303 [arXiv:1802.06998] [INSPIRE].
J.D. Lewin and P.F. Smith, Review of mathematics, numerical factors and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil, Astropart. Phys. 6 (1996) 87 [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Dark matter search results from a one ton-year exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111302 [arXiv:1805.12562] [INSPIRE].
Fermi-LAT collaboration, Search for gamma-ray spectral lines with the Fermi Large Area Telescope and dark matter implications, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 082002 [arXiv:1305.5597] [INSPIRE].
H.E.S.S. collaboration, Search for photon-linelike signatures from dark matter annihilations with H.E.S.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 041301 [arXiv:1301.1173] [INSPIRE].
CTA Consortium collaboration, Monte Carlo design studies for the Cherenkov Telescope Array, Astropart. Phys. 43 (2013) 171 [arXiv:1210.3503] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Physics reach of the XENON1T dark matter experiment, JCAP 04 (2016) 027 [arXiv:1512.07501] [INSPIRE].
H.H. Patel, Package-X 2.0: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 218 (2017) 66 [arXiv:1612.00009] [INSPIRE].
K. Sigurdson, M. Doran, A. Kurylov, R.R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, Dark-matter electric and magnetic dipole moments, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 083501 [Erratum ibid. 73 (2006) 089903] [astro-ph/0406355] [INSPIRE].
E. Masso, S. Mohanty and S. Rao, Dipolar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 036009 [arXiv:0906.1979] [INSPIRE].
S. Chang, N. Weiner and I. Yavin, Magnetic inelastic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 125011 [arXiv:1007.4200] [INSPIRE].
E. Del Nobile, C. Kouvaris, P. Panci, F. Sannino and J. Virkajarvi, Light magnetic dark matter in direct detection searches, JCAP 08 (2012) 010 [arXiv:1203.6652] [INSPIRE].
C.M. Ho and R.J. Scherrer, Anapole dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013) 341 [arXiv:1211.0503] [INSPIRE].
E. Del Nobile, G.B. Gelmini, P. Gondolo and J.-H. Huh, Direct detection of light anapole and magnetic dipole DM, JCAP 06 (2014) 002 [arXiv:1401.4508] [INSPIRE].
T. Banks, J.-F. Fortin and S. Thomas, Direct detection of dark matter electromagnetic dipole moments, arXiv:1007.5515 [INSPIRE].
J. Kopp, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, Global interpretation of direct dark matter searches after CDMS-II results, JCAP 02 (2010) 014 [arXiv:0912.4264] [INSPIRE].
J. Kopp, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, Light dark matter in the light of CRESST-II, JCAP 03 (2012) 001 [arXiv:1110.2721] [INSPIRE].
A. Fitzpatrick and K.M. Zurek, Dark moments and the DAMA-CoGeNT puzzle, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 075004 [arXiv:1007.5325] [INSPIRE].
M.I. Gresham and K.M. Zurek, Light dark matter anomalies after LUX, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 016017 [arXiv:1311.2082] [INSPIRE].
LUX collaboration, First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Lowering the radioactivity of the photomultiplier tubes for the XENON1T dark matter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 546 [arXiv:1503.07698] [INSPIRE].
P. Barrow et al., Qualification tests of the R11410-21 Photomultiplier tubes for the XENON1T detector, 2017 JINST 12 P01024 [arXiv:1609.01654] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2002.12534
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Kawamura, J., Okawa, S. & Omura, Y. Current status and muon g − 2 explanation of lepton portal dark matter. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2020)042
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2020)042