Abstract
Dimensional reduction has proven to be a surprisingly powerful tool for delineating the boundary between the string landscape and the swampland. Bounds from the Weak Gravity Conjecture and the Repulsive Force Conjecture, for instance, are exactly preserved under dimensional reduction. Motivated by its success in these cases, we apply a similar dimensional reduction analysis to bounds on the gradient of the scalar field potential V and the mass scale m of a tower of light particles in terms of the cosmological constant Λ, which ideally may pin down ambiguous O(1) constants appearing in the de Sitter Conjecture and the (Anti) de Sitter Distance Conjecture, respectively. We find that this analysis distinguishes the bounds \( \left|\nabla V\right|/V\ge \sqrt{4/\left(d-2\right)} \), m ≲ |Λ|1/2, and m ≲ |Λ|1/d in d-dimensional Planck units. The first of these bounds is equivalent to the strong energy condition in Einstein-dilaton gravity and precludes accelerated expansion of the universe. It is almost certainly violated in our universe, though it may apply in asymptotic limits of scalar field space. The second bound cannot be satisfied in our universe, though it is saturated in supersymmetric AdS vacua with well-understood uplifts to 10d/11d supergravity. The third bound likely has a limited range of validity in quantum gravity as well, so it may or may not apply to our universe. However, if it does apply, it suggests a possible relation between the cosmological constant and the neutrino mass, which (by the see-saw mechanism) may further provide a relation between the cosmological constant problem and the hierarchy problem. We also work out the conditions for eternal inflation in general spacetime dimensions, and we comment on the behavior of these conditions under dimensional reduction.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
C. Vafa, The String landscape and the swampland, hep-th/0509212 [INSPIRE].
H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland, Nucl. Phys. B 766 (2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264] [INSPIRE].
D. Lüst, E. Palti and C. Vafa, AdS and the Swampland, Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134867 [arXiv:1906.05225] [INSPIRE].
G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko and C. Vafa, de Sitter Space and the Swampland, arXiv:1806.08362 [INSPIRE].
T. Rudelius, Conditions for (No) Eternal Inflation, JCAP 08 (2019) 009 [arXiv:1905.05198] [INSPIRE].
D. Andriot, N. Cribiori and D. Erkinger, The web of swampland conjectures and the TCC bound, JHEP 07 (2020) 162 [arXiv:2004.00030] [INSPIRE].
L. E. Ibáñez, V. Martin-Lozano and I. Valenzuela, Constraining Neutrino Masses, the Cosmological Constant and BSM Physics from the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 11 (2017) 066 [arXiv:1706.05392] [INSPIRE].
E. Gonzalo and L. E. Ibáñez, The Fundamental Need for a SM Higgs and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, Phys. Lett. B 786 (2018) 272 [arXiv:1806.09647] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa, The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force, JHEP 06 (2007) 060 [hep-th/0601001] [INSPIRE].
E. Palti, The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Scalar Fields, JHEP 08 (2017) 034 [arXiv:1705.04328] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction, JHEP 02 (2016) 140 [arXiv:1509.06374] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Repulsive Forces and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 10 (2019) 055 [arXiv:1906.02206] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Evidence for a sublattice weak gravity conjecture, JHEP 08 (2017) 025 [arXiv:1606.08437] [INSPIRE].
S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand, Tensionless Strings and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 10 (2018) 164 [arXiv:1808.05958] [INSPIRE].
D. Klaewer, S.-J. Lee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner, Quantum corrections in 4d N = 1 infinite distance limits and the weak gravity conjecture, JHEP 03 (2021) 252 [arXiv:2011.00024] [INSPIRE].
S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand, Modular Fluxes, Elliptic Genera, and Weak Gravity Conjectures in Four Dimensions, JHEP 08 (2019) 104 [arXiv:1901.08065] [INSPIRE].
S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand, A Stringy Test of the Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture, Nucl. Phys. B 938 (2019) 321 [arXiv:1810.05169] [INSPIRE].
T. W. Grimm and D. Van De Heisteeg, Infinite Distances and the Axion Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 03 (2020) 020 [arXiv:1905.00901] [INSPIRE].
N. Gendler and I. Valenzuela, Merging the weak gravity and distance conjectures using BPS extremal black holes, JHEP 01 (2021) 176 [arXiv:2004.10768] [INSPIRE].
C. F. Cota, A. Klemm and T. Schimannek, State counting on fibered CY-3 folds and the non-Abelian Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 05 (2021) 030 [arXiv:2012.09836] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, Infrared Consistency and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 12 (2014) 087 [arXiv:1407.7865] [INSPIRE].
S. Hod, A proof of the weak gravity conjecture, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26 (2017) 1742004 [arXiv:1705.06287] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Emergence from an Ultraviolet Cutoff, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 337 [arXiv:1712.01868] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung, J. Liu and G. N. Remmen, Proof of the Weak Gravity Conjecture from Black Hole Entropy, JHEP 10 (2018) 004 [arXiv:1801.08546] [INSPIRE].
A. Urbano, Towards a proof of the Weak Gravity Conjecture, arXiv:1810.05621 [INSPIRE].
M. Montero, A Holographic Derivation of the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 03 (2019) 157 [arXiv:1812.03978] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and G. Villadoro, Quantum Horizons of the Standard Model Landscape, JHEP 06 (2007) 078 [hep-th/0703067] [INSPIRE].
H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Non-supersymmetric AdS and the Swampland, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 21 (2017) 1787 [arXiv:1610.01533] [INSPIRE].
L. E. Ibáñez, V. Martin-Lozano and I. Valenzuela, Constraining the EW Hierarchy from the Weak Gravity Conjecture, arXiv:1707.05811 [INSPIRE].
E. Gonzalo, A. Herráez and L. E. Ibáñez, AdS-phobia, the WGC, the Standard Model and Supersymmetry, JHEP 06 (2018) 051 [arXiv:1803.08455] [INSPIRE].
A. A. Starobinsky, Stochastic de Sitter (inflationary) Stage in the early universe, Lect. Notes Phys. 246 (1986) 107 [INSPIRE].
S.-J. Rey, Dynamics of Inflationary Phase Transition, Nucl. Phys. B 284 (1987) 706 [INSPIRE].
A. D. Linde, Hard art of the universe creation (stochastic approach to tunneling and baby universe formation), Nucl. Phys. B 372 (1992) 421 [hep-th/9110037] [INSPIRE].
P. Creminelli, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, The Phase Transition to Slow-roll Eternal Inflation, JHEP 09 (2008) 036 [arXiv:0802.1067] [INSPIRE].
G. Barenboim, W.-I. Park and W. H. Kinney, Eternal Hilltop Inflation, JCAP 05 (2016) 030 [arXiv:1601.08140] [INSPIRE].
W. H. Kinney, Eternal Inflation and the Refined Swampland Conjecture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 081302 [arXiv:1811.11698] [INSPIRE].
S. Brahma and S. Shandera, Stochastic eternal inflation is in the swampland, JHEP 11 (2019) 016 [arXiv:1904.10979] [INSPIRE].
M.-S. Seo, Eternal inflation in light of Wheeler-DeWitt equation, JCAP 11 (2020) 007 [arXiv:2007.03866] [INSPIRE].
A. Bedroya, M. Montero, C. Vafa and I. Valenzuela, de Sitter Bubbles and the Swampland, arXiv:2008.07555 [INSPIRE].
R. Blumenhagen, C. Kneissl and A. Makridou, de Sitter Quantum Breaking, Swampland Conjectures and Thermal Strings, arXiv:2011.13956 [INSPIRE].
J. Chojnacki, J. Krajecka, J. H. Kwapisz, O. Slowik and A. Strag, Is asymptotically safe inflation eternal?, JCAP 04 (2021) 076 [arXiv:2101.00866] [INSPIRE].
O. Trivedi, Rejuvenating the hope of a swampland consistent inflated multiverse with tachyonic inflation in the high energy RS-II Braneworld, arXiv:2101.00638 [INSPIRE].
S. Dubovsky, L. Senatore and G. Villadoro, Universality of the Volume Bound in Slow-Roll Eternal Inflation, JHEP 05 (2012) 035 [arXiv:1111.1725] [INSPIRE].
S. K. Garg and C. Krishnan, Bounds on Slow Roll and the de Sitter Swampland, JHEP 11 (2019) 075 [arXiv:1807.05193] [INSPIRE].
H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa, Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland, Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 180 [arXiv:1810.05506] [INSPIRE].
D. Andriot and C. Roupec, Further refining the de Sitter swampland conjecture, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1800105 [arXiv:1811.08889] [INSPIRE].
D. Andriot, P. Marconnet and T. Wrase, New de Sitter solutions of 10d type IIB supergravity, JHEP 08 (2020) 076 [arXiv:2005.12930] [INSPIRE].
D. Andriot, Tachyonic de Sitter solutions of 10d type-II supergravities, arXiv:2101.06251 [INSPIRE].
D. Andriot, P. Marconnet and T. Wrase, Intricacies of classical de Sitter string backgrounds, Phys. Lett. B 812 (2021) 136015 [arXiv:2006.01848] [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P. J. Steinhardt and C. Vafa, On the Cosmological Implications of the String Swampland, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 271 [arXiv:1806.09718] [INSPIRE].
M. Cicoli, G. Dibitetto and F. G. Pedro, Out of the Swampland with Multifield Quintessence?, JHEP 10 (2020) 035 [arXiv:2007.11011] [INSPIRE].
Y. Akrami, M. Sasaki, A. R. Solomon and V. Vardanyan, Multi-field dark energy: Cosmic acceleration on a steep potential, Phys. Lett. B 819 (2021) 136427 [arXiv:2008.13660] [INSPIRE].
F. Farakos, On the F-term problem and quintessence supersymmetry breaking, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 275 [arXiv:2101.05759] [INSPIRE].
A. Banerjee, H. Cai, L. Heisenberg, E. O. Colgáin, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and T. Yang, Hubble sinks in the low-redshift swampland, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) L081305 [arXiv:2006.00244] [INSPIRE].
F. Denef, A. Hebecker and T. Wrase, de Sitter swampland conjecture and the Higgs potential, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 086004 [arXiv:1807.06581] [INSPIRE].
S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde and S. P. Trivedi, de Sitter vacua in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 046005 [hep-th/0301240] [INSPIRE].
J. P. Conlon, F. Quevedo and K. Suruliz, Large-volume flux compactifications: Moduli spectrum and D3/D7 soft supersymmetry breaking, JHEP 08 (2005) 007 [hep-th/0505076] [INSPIRE].
A. Bedroya and C. Vafa, Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland, JHEP 09 (2020) 123 [arXiv:1909.11063] [INSPIRE].
T. Wrase and M. Zagermann, On Classical de Sitter Vacua in String Theory, Fortsch. Phys. 58 (2010) 906 [arXiv:1003.0029] [INSPIRE].
D. Andriot, Open problems on classical de Sitter solutions, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1900026 [arXiv:1902.10093] [INSPIRE].
M. Dine and N. Seiberg, Is the Superstring Weakly Coupled?, Phys. Lett. B 162 (1985) 299 [INSPIRE].
T. Rudelius, Asymptotic Observables and the Swampland, arXiv:2106.09026 [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2101.11617
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Rudelius, T. Dimensional reduction and (Anti) de Sitter bounds. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 41 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2021)041
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2021)041