Abstract
We utilize machine learning to study the string landscape. Deep data dives and conjecture generation are proposed as useful frameworks for utilizing machine learning in the landscape, and examples of each are presented. A decision tree accurately predicts the number of weak Fano toric threefolds arising from reflexive polytopes, each of which determines a smooth F-theory compactification, and linear regression generates a previously proven conjecture for the gauge group rank in an ensemble of \( \frac{4}{3}\times 2.96\times {10}^{755} \) F-theory compactifications. Logistic regression generates a new conjecture for when E 6 arises in the large ensemble of F-theory compactifications, which is then rigorously proven. This result may be relevant for the appearance of visible sectors in the ensemble. Through conjecture generation, machine learning is useful not only for numerics, but also for rigorous results.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, Quantization of four form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant, JHEP 06 (2000) 006 [hep-th/0004134] [INSPIRE].
S. Ashok and M.R. Douglas, Counting flux vacua, JHEP 01 (2004) 060 [hep-th/0307049] [INSPIRE].
F. Denef and M.R. Douglas, Distributions of flux vacua, JHEP 05 (2004) 072 [hep-th/0404116] [INSPIRE].
W. Taylor and Y.-N. Wang, The F-theory geometry with most flux vacua, JHEP 12 (2015) 164 [arXiv:1511.03209] [INSPIRE].
J. Halverson, C. Long and B. Sung, On Algorithmic Universality in F-theory Compactifications, arXiv:1706.02299 [INSPIRE].
F. Denef and M.R. Douglas, Computational complexity of the landscape. I., Annals Phys. 322 (2007) 1096 [hep-th/0602072] [INSPIRE].
M. Cvetič, I. Garcia-Etxebarria and J. Halverson, On the computation of non-perturbative effective potentials in the string theory landscape: IIB/F-theory perspective, Fortsch. Phys. 59 (2011) 243 [arXiv:1009.5386] [INSPIRE].
F. Denef, M.R. Douglas, B. Greene and C. Zukowski, Computational complexity of the landscape II — Cosmological considerations, arXiv:1706.06430 [INSPIRE].
N. Bao, R. Bousso, S. Jordan and B. Lackey, Fast optimization algorithms and the cosmological constant, arXiv:1706.08503 [INSPIRE].
Y.-H. He, Deep-Learning the Landscape, arXiv:1706.02714 [INSPIRE].
F. Ruehle, Evolving neural networks with genetic algorithms to study the String Landscape, JHEP 08 (2017) 038 [arXiv:1706.07024] [INSPIRE].
D. Krefl and R.-K. Seong, Machine Learning of Calabi-Yau Volumes, arXiv:1706.03346 [INSPIRE].
T. Mitchell, Machine Learning, McGraw-Hill (1997).
C. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer Publishing Company (2006).
M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, Classification of reflexive polyhedra in three-dimensions, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 847 [hep-th/9805190] [INSPIRE].
J. Halverson and J. Tian, Cost of seven-brane gauge symmetry in a quadrillion F-theory compactifications, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 026005 [arXiv:1610.08864] [INSPIRE].
C. Vafa, Evidence for F-theory, Nucl. Phys. B 469 (1996) 403 [hep-th/9602022] [INSPIRE].
D.R. Morrison and C. Vafa, Compactifications of F-theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds. 2., Nucl. Phys. B 476 (1996) 437 [hep-th/9603161] [INSPIRE].
N. Nakayama, On Weierstrass models, in Algebraic geometry and commutative algebra. Volume II, Kinokuniya, Tokyo Japan (1988), pp. 405–431.
L.B. Anderson and W. Taylor, Geometric constraints in dual F-theory and heterotic string compactifications, JHEP 08 (2014) 025 [arXiv:1405.2074] [INSPIRE].
J. Marsano and S. Schäfer-Nameki, Yukawas, G-flux and Spectral Covers from Resolved Calabi-Yau’s, JHEP 11 (2011) 098 [arXiv:1108.1794] [INSPIRE].
C. Lawrie and S. Schäfer-Nameki, The Tate Form on Steroids: Resolution and Higher Codimension Fibers, JHEP 04 (2013) 061 [arXiv:1212.2949] [INSPIRE].
H. Hayashi, C. Lawrie, D.R. Morrison and S. Schäfer-Nameki, Box Graphs and Singular Fibers, JHEP 05 (2014) 048 [arXiv:1402.2653] [INSPIRE].
A.P. Braun and S. Schäfer-Nameki, Box Graphs and Resolutions I, Nucl. Phys. B 905 (2016) 447 [arXiv:1407.3520] [INSPIRE].
A.P. Braun and S. Schäfer-Nameki, Box Graphs and Resolutions II: From Coulomb Phases to Fiber Faces, Nucl. Phys. B 905 (2016) 480 [arXiv:1511.01801] [INSPIRE].
A. Grassi, J. Halverson and J.L. Shaneson, Matter From Geometry Without Resolution, JHEP 10 (2013) 205 [arXiv:1306.1832] [INSPIRE].
A. Grassi, J. Halverson and J.L. Shaneson, Non-Abelian Gauge Symmetry and the Higgs Mechanism in F-theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 336 (2015) 1231 [arXiv:1402.5962] [INSPIRE].
A. Grassi, J. Halverson and J.L. Shaneson, Geometry and Topology of String Junctions, arXiv:1410.6817 [INSPIRE].
A. Grassi, J. Halverson, F. Ruehle and J.L. Shaneson, Dualities of Deformed \( \mathcal{N}=2 \) SCFTs from Link Monodromy on D3-brane States, arXiv:1611.01154 [INSPIRE].
D.R. Morrison and W. Taylor, Classifying bases for 6D F-theory models, Central Eur. J. Phys. 10 (2012) 1072 [arXiv:1201.1943] [INSPIRE].
A. Grassi, J. Halverson, J. Shaneson and W. Taylor, Non-Higgsable QCD and the Standard Model Spectrum in F-theory, JHEP 01 (2015) 086 [arXiv:1409.8295] [INSPIRE].
A.P. Braun and T. Watari, The Vertical, the Horizontal and the Rest: anatomy of the middle cohomology of Calabi-Yau fourfolds and F-theory applications, JHEP 01 (2015) 047 [arXiv:1408.6167] [INSPIRE].
T. Watari, Statistics of F-theory flux vacua for particle physics, JHEP 11 (2015) 065 [arXiv:1506.08433] [INSPIRE].
J. Halverson, Strong Coupling in F-theory and Geometrically Non-Higgsable Seven-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 919 (2017) 267 [arXiv:1603.01639] [INSPIRE].
J. Halverson and W. Taylor, \( {\mathrm{\mathbb{P}}}^1 \) -bundle bases and the prevalence of non-Higgsable structure in 4D F-theory models, JHEP 09 (2015) 086 [arXiv:1506.03204] [INSPIRE].
W. Taylor and Y.-N. Wang, A Monte Carlo exploration of threefold base geometries for 4d F-theory vacua, JHEP 01 (2016) 137 [arXiv:1510.04978] [INSPIRE].
D.R. Morrison and W. Taylor, Non-Higgsable clusters for 4D F-theory models, JHEP 05 (2015) 080 [arXiv:1412.6112] [INSPIRE].
D.R. Morrison and W. Taylor, Toric bases for 6D F-theory models, Fortsch. Phys. 60 (2012) 1187 [arXiv:1204.0283] [INSPIRE].
W. Taylor, On the Hodge structure of elliptically fibered Calabi-Yau threefolds, JHEP 08 (2012) 032 [arXiv:1205.0952] [INSPIRE].
D.R. Morrison and W. Taylor, Sections, multisections and U(1) fields in F-theory, arXiv:1404.1527 [INSPIRE].
G. Martini and W. Taylor, 6D F-theory models and elliptically fibered Calabi-Yau threefolds over semi-toric base surfaces, JHEP 06 (2015) 061 [arXiv:1404.6300] [INSPIRE].
S.B. Johnson and W. Taylor, Calabi-Yau threefolds with large h 2,1, JHEP 10 (2014) 23 [arXiv:1406.0514] [INSPIRE].
W. Taylor and Y.-N. Wang, Non-toric bases for elliptic Calabi-Yau threefolds and 6D F-theory vacua, arXiv:1504.07689 [INSPIRE].
J.A. De Loera, J. Rambau and F. Santos, Triangulations: Structures for Algorithms and Applications, 1st edition, Springer Publishing Company (2010).
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1707.00655
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Carifio, J., Halverson, J., Krioukov, D. et al. Machine learning in the string landscape. J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 157 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2017)157
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2017)157