Abstract
A global symmetry of a quantum field theory is said to have an ’t Hooft anomaly if it cannot be promoted to a local symmetry of a gauged theory. In this paper, we show that the anomaly is also an obstruction to defining symmetric boundary conditions. This applies to Lorentz symmetries with gravitational anomalies as well. For theories with perturbative anomalies, we demonstrate the obstruction by analyzing the Wess-Zumino consistency conditions and current Ward identities in the presence of a boundary. We then recast the problem in terms of symmetry defects and find the same conclusions for anomalies of discrete and orientation-reversing global symmetries, up to the conjecture that global gravitational anomalies, which may not be associated with any diffeomorphism symmetry, also forbid the existence of boundary conditions. This conjecture holds for known gravitational anomalies in D ≤ 3 which allows us to conclude the obstruction result for D ≤ 4.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
G. ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) 135 [INSPIRE].
C.G. Callan Jr. and J.A. Harvey, Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls, Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 427 [INSPIRE].
A. Kapustin, Symmetry Protected Topological Phases, Anomalies, and Cobordisms: Beyond Group Cohomology, arXiv:1403.1467 [INSPIRE].
A. Kapustin, R. Thorngren, A. Turzillo and Z. Wang, Fermionic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases and Cobordisms, JHEP 12 (2015) 052 [arXiv:1406.7329] [INSPIRE].
D.S. Freed and M.J. Hopkins, Reflection positivity and invertible topological phases, Geom. Topol. 25 (2021) 1165 [arXiv:1604.06527] [INSPIRE].
X.-G. Wen, Classifying gauge anomalies through symmetry-protected trivial orders and classifying gravitational anomalies through topological orders, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 045013 [arXiv:1303.1803] [INSPIRE].
M. Watanabe, Conformal field theory towards quantum information and holography, MSc Thesis, The University of Tokyo (2016).
M. Billò, V. Gonçalves, E. Lauria and M. Meineri, Defects in conformal field theory, JHEP 04 (2016) 091 [arXiv:1601.02883] [INSPIRE].
K. Jensen, E. Shaverin and A. Yarom, ’t Hooft anomalies and boundaries, JHEP 01 (2018) 085 [arXiv:1710.07299] [INSPIRE].
S. Hellerman, D. Orlando and M. Watanabe, Quantum Information Theory of the Gravitational Anomaly, arXiv:2101.03320 [INSPIRE].
S. Hellerman, D. Orlando and M. Watanabe, Quantum information theory of the gravitational anomaly, paper presented at: Kavli IPMU String Seminar, November 2015; Seminar in Theoretical Physics, YITP (Stony Brook), December 2015; Statistics, Quantum Information, and Gravity; Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics — Kyoto University (Japan), June 2016, Quantum Information in String Theory and Many-body Systems; High Energy and Gravity Seminars, KITP, March 2017; Weekly seminar at Perimeter Institute, November 2017.
D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP 02 (2015) 172 [arXiv:1412.5148] [INSPIRE].
R. Bertlmann, Anomalies in quantum field theory, Oxford University Press (1996).
J. Wess and B. Zumino, Consequences of anomalous Ward identities, Phys. Lett. B 37 (1971) 95 [INSPIRE].
B. Zumino, Chiral anomalies and differential geometry: lectures given at Les Houches, August 1983, in Les Houches Summer School on Theoretical Physics: Relativity, Groups and Topology, pp. 1291–1322 (1983) [INSPIRE].
L. Álvarez-Gaumé and P.H. Ginsparg, The Structure of Gauge and Gravitational Anomalies, Annals Phys. 161 (1985) 423 [Erratum ibid. 171 (1986) 233] [INSPIRE].
J. Manes, R. Stora and B. Zumino, Algebraic Study of Chiral Anomalies, Commun. Math. Phys. 102 (1985) 157 [INSPIRE].
B. Zumino, Cohomology of Gauge Groups: Cocycles and Schwinger Terms, Nucl. Phys. B 253 (1985) 477 [INSPIRE].
L.D. Faddeev, Operator Anomaly for the Gauss Law, Phys. Lett. B 145 (1984) 81 [INSPIRE].
L.D. Faddeev and S.L. Shatashvili, Algebraic and Hamiltonian Methods in the Theory of Nonabelian Anomalies, Theor. Math. Phys. 60 (1985) 770 [INSPIRE].
L.D. Faddeev and S.L. Shatashvili, Realization of the Schwinger Term in the Gauss Law and the Possibility of Correct Quantization of a Theory with Anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 167 (1986) 225 [INSPIRE].
W.A. Bardeen and B. Zumino, Consistent and Covariant Anomalies in Gauge and Gravitational Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 244 (1984) 421 [INSPIRE].
B. Zumino, Anomalies, cocycles and Schwinger terms, in Symposium on Anomalies, Geometry, Topology, (1985) [INSPIRE].
L. Álvarez-Gaumé and E. Witten, Gravitational Anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B 234 (1984) 269 [INSPIRE].
Y. Nakayama, Realization of impossible anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 085002 [arXiv:1804.02940] [INSPIRE].
C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, On exotic consistent anomalies in (1 + 1)d: A ghost story, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 119 [arXiv:2009.07273] [INSPIRE].
H.W. Diehl and S. Dietrich, Field-theoretical approach to multicritical behavior near free surfaces, Phys. Rev. B 24 (1981) 2878 [INSPIRE].
J.L. Cardy, Conformal Invariance and Surface Critical Behavior, Nucl. Phys. B 240 (1984) 514 [INSPIRE].
J.L. Cardy and D.C. Lewellen, Bulk and boundary operators in conformal field theory, Phys. Lett. B 259 (1991) 274 [INSPIRE].
D.M. McAvity and H. Osborn, Energy momentum tensor in conformal field theories near a boundary, Nucl. Phys. B 406 (1993) 655 [hep-th/9302068] [INSPIRE].
D.M. McAvity and H. Osborn, Conformal field theories near a boundary in general dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 455 (1995) 522 [cond-mat/9505127] [INSPIRE].
J.L. Cardy, Boundary conformal field theory, hep-th/0411189 [INSPIRE].
N. Andrei et al., Boundary and Defect CFT: Open Problems and Applications, J. Phys. A 53 (2020) 453002 [arXiv:1810.05697] [INSPIRE].
D. Simmons-Duffin, The Conformal Bootstrap, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp. 1–74 (2017) [DOI] [arXiv:1602.07982] [INSPIRE].
S. Rychkov, EPFL Lectures on Conformal Field Theory in D ≥ 3 Dimensions, SpringerBriefs in Physics (2016), [DOI] [arXiv:1601.05000] [INSPIRE].
J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (2007) [DOI] [INSPIRE].
O. Alvarez, Theory of Strings with Boundaries: Fluctuations, Topology, and Quantum Geometry, Nucl. Phys. B 216 (1983) 125 [INSPIRE].
C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang and X. Yin, Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions, JHEP 01 (2019) 026 [arXiv:1802.04445] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Topological Quantum Field Theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 117 (1988) 353 [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Monopoles and four manifolds, Math. Res. Lett. 1 (1994) 769 [hep-th/9411102] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, On S duality in Abelian gauge theory, Selecta Math. 1 (1995) 383 [hep-th/9505186] [INSPIRE].
G.W. Moore and E. Witten, Integration over the u plane in Donaldson theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 1 (1997) 298 [hep-th/9709193] [INSPIRE].
A. Losev, N. Nekrasov and S.L. Shatashvili, Issues in topological gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B 534 (1998) 549 [hep-th/9711108] [INSPIRE].
A.D. Shapere and Y. Tachikawa, Central charges of N = 2 superconformal field theories in four dimensions, JHEP 09 (2008) 109 [arXiv:0804.1957] [INSPIRE].
S.-s. Chern, On the curvatura integra in a riemannian manifold, Annals Math. 46 (1945) 674.
L.J. Alty, The Generalized Gauss-Bonnet-Chern theorem, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 3094 [INSPIRE].
V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov and B. Zan, Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs, JHEP 10 (2018) 108 [arXiv:1807.11512] [INSPIRE].
V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov and B. Zan, Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs II. Two-dimensional Potts model at Q > 4, SciPost Phys. 5 (2018) 050 [arXiv:1808.04380] [INSPIRE].
S. Giombi, R. Huang, I.R. Klebanov, S.S. Pufu and G. Tarnopolsky, The O(N ) Model in 4 < d < 6: Instantons and complex CFTs, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 045013 [arXiv:1910.02462] [INSPIRE].
C.B. Jepsen, I.R. Klebanov and F.K. Popov, RG limit cycles and unconventional fixed points in perturbative QFT, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 046015 [arXiv:2010.15133] [INSPIRE].
J.A. Harvey, R. Minasian and G.W. Moore, NonAbelian tensor multiplet anomalies, JHEP 09 (1998) 004 [hep-th/9808060] [INSPIRE].
K.A. Intriligator, Anomaly matching and a Hopf-Wess-Zumino term in 6d, N = (2, 0) field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 581 (2000) 257 [hep-th/0001205] [INSPIRE].
P. Yi, Anomaly of (2, 0) theories, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 106006 [hep-th/0106165] [INSPIRE].
D. Anselmi, D.Z. Freedman, M.T. Grisaru and A.A. Johansen, Nonperturbative formulas for central functions of supersymmetric gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 526 (1998) 543 [hep-th/9708042] [INSPIRE].
D. Anselmi, J. Erlich, D.Z. Freedman and A.A. Johansen, Positivity constraints on anomalies in supersymmetric gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 7570 [hep-th/9711035] [INSPIRE].
D.M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations, JHEP 05 (2008) 012 [arXiv:0803.1467] [INSPIRE].
D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, Supersymmetric Boundary Conditions in N = 4 Super Yang-Mills Theory, J. Statist. Phys. 135 (2009) 789 [arXiv:0804.2902] [INSPIRE].
D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, S-duality of Boundary Conditions In N = 4 Super Yang-Mills Theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13 (2009) 721 [arXiv:0807.3720] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, An SU(2) Anomaly, Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 324 [INSPIRE].
Y. Tachikawa, Y. Wang and G. Zafrir, Comments on the twisted punctures of Aeven class S theory, JHEP 06 (2018) 163 [arXiv:1804.09143] [INSPIRE].
D.V. Else and C. Nayak, Classifying symmetry-protected topological phases through the anomalous action of the symmetry on the edge, Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 235137 [arXiv:1409.5436] [INSPIRE].
T. Campion, Is lie group cohomology determined by restriction to finite subgroups?, MathOverflow [https://mathoverflow.net/questions/372106/ is-lie-group-cohomology-determined-by-restriction-to-finite-subgroups].
U. Pachner, P.l. homeomorphic manifolds are equivalent by elementary shellings, Eur. J. Combinatorics 12 (1991) 129.
K. Brown, Cohomology of Groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer New York (2012) [DOI].
S. Lane, S. Axler, S.-V.N. Jork, F. Gehring and P. Halmos, Categories for the Working Mathematician, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer (1998).
M.M. Kapranov, The permutoassociahedron, Mac Lane’s coherence theorem and asymptotic zones for the KZ equation, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 85 (1993) 119.
F. Pollmann, E. Berg, A.M. Turner and M. Oshikawa, Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012) 075125.
X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group, Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013) 155114 [arXiv:1106.4772] [INSPIRE].
J.D. Stasheff, Continuous cohomology of groups and classifying spaces, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 84 (1978) 513.
F. Wagemann and C. Wockel, A cocycle model for topological and lie group cohomology, arXiv:1110.3304.
E. Witten, The “Parity” Anomaly On An Unorientable Manifold, Phys. Rev. B 94 (2016) 195150 [arXiv:1605.02391] [INSPIRE].
Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry-protected topological orders for interacting fermions: Fermionic topological nonlinear σ models and a special group supercohomology theory, Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 115141 [arXiv:1201.2648] [INSPIRE].
A. Vishwanath and T. Senthil, Physics of three dimensional bosonic topological insulators: Surface Deconfined Criticality and Quantized Magnetoelectric Effect, Phys. Rev. X 3 (2013) 011016 [arXiv:1209.3058] [INSPIRE].
C. Wang and T. Senthil, Boson topological insulators: A window into highly entangled quantum phases, Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013) 235122 [arXiv:1302.6234] [INSPIRE].
F.J. Burnell, X. Chen, L. Fidkowski and A. Vishwanath, Exactly soluble model of a three-dimensional symmetry-protected topological phase of bosons with surface topological order, Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 245122 [arXiv:1302.7072] [INSPIRE].
L. Fidkowski, J. Haah and M.B. Hastings, Exactly solvable model for a 4 + 1D beyond-cohomology symmetry-protected topological phase, Phys. Rev. B 101 (2020) 155124 [arXiv:1912.05565] [INSPIRE].
A. Kitaev, Homotopy-theoretic approach to SPT phases in action: ℤ16 classification of three-dimensional superconductors, http://helper.ipam.ucla.edu/publications/stq2015/stq2015_12389.pdf (2015).
A. Kapustin and R. Thorngren, Fermionic SPT phases in higher dimensions and bosonization, JHEP 10 (2017) 080 [arXiv:1701.08264] [INSPIRE].
D. Gaiotto and T. Johnson-Freyd, Symmetry Protected Topological phases and Generalized Cohomology, JHEP 05 (2019) 007 [arXiv:1712.07950] [INSPIRE].
K. Shiozaki, C.Z. Xiong and K. Gomi, Generalized homology and Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence in crystalline symmetry protected topological phenomena, arXiv:1810.00801 [INSPIRE].
I. García-Etxebarria and M. Montero, Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics, JHEP 08 (2019) 003 [arXiv:1808.00009] [INSPIRE].
J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rept. Prog. Phys. 75 (2012) 076501 [arXiv:1202.1293] [INSPIRE].
R. Thorngren, Anomalies and Bosonization, Commun. Math. Phys. 378 (2020) 1775 [arXiv:1810.04414] [INSPIRE].
R. Thom, Some “global” properties of differentiable manifolds, TopologicalLibrary (2007), pp. 131–209 [DOI].
D. Sullivan, René thom’s work on geometric homology and bordism, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 41 (2004) 341.
L. Fidkowski and A. Kitaev, The effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 134509 [arXiv:0904.2197] [INSPIRE].
S. Ryu and S.-C. Zhang, Interacting topological phases and modular invariance, Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012) 245132 [arXiv:1202.4484] [INSPIRE].
X.-L. Qi, A new class of (2 + 1)-dimensional topological superconductors with ℤ topological classification, New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 065002 [arXiv:1202.3983] [INSPIRE].
H. Yao and S. Ryu, Interaction effect on topological classification of superconductors in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013) 064507 [arXiv:1202.5805] [INSPIRE].
P.B. Smith and D. Tong, What Symmetries are Preserved by a Fermion Boundary State?, arXiv:2006.07369 [INSPIRE].
D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg, Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature, JHEP 05 (2017) 091 [arXiv:1703.00501] [INSPIRE].
T. Sulejmanpasic, H. Shao, A. Sandvik and M. Ünsal, Confinement in the bulk, deconfinement on the wall: infrared equivalence between compactified QCD and quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 091601 [arXiv:1608.09011] [INSPIRE].
I. Hason, Z. Komargodski and R. Thorngren, Anomaly matching in the symmetry broken phase: Domain walls, cpt, and the smith isomorphism, SciPost Phys. 8 (2020) 062.
R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath and R. Verresen, Intrinsically gapless topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) 075132 [arXiv:2008.06638] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2012.15861
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Thorngren, R., Wang, Y. Anomalous symmetries end at the boundary. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2021)017
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2021)017